FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461082.79736027 11.02.2026 07:08:01.927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
First image: 2461082.79736027 11.02.2026 07:08:01.927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Last  image: 2461256.68675234 04.08.2026 04:28:45.402   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  8487
Objects passed selection criteria:  8461
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 6342.5
Average stars matched: 6169.75 (97.2763 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   234544 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Aug  3 23:38:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461082.79736027 11.02.2026 07:08:01.927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
First image: 2461082.79736027 11.02.2026 07:08:01.927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Last  image: 2461256.68675234 04.08.2026 04:28:45.402   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 67
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.25
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  48673
Objects passed selection criteria:  48532
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 37533.8
Average stars matched: 36250.5 (96.5811 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   269968 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Aug  3 23:39:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 335310 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 335310 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits_preview.png'

UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits


renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits_preview.png'

UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 533.1221
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 561.4736
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1289.8908
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 409.6669
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1293.9551
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 409.4210
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.4195
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-03T23:28:05.1334336' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-04T04:28:05.1334336' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61256.1861705207 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-04T04:28:15.0358583' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61256.1862851274 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     143.999870048962 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     69.9995778157387 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     18.9877777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     344.658888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =      3.0479466882697 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits :)

Spent 0.785834 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-03T23:28:45.4025585' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-04T04:28:45.4025585' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61256.1866365974 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-04T04:28:55.3065913' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61256.1867512269 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      143.99987006525 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     69.9995778540221 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     18.9508333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     344.705833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.05355998968147 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits :)

Spent 0.765528 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits



fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461256.68628626
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:26.321 +70:00:41.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26
Second-epoch image center 09:36:26.321 +70:00:41.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0252 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:27.087 +70:00:45.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26
Second-epoch image center 09:36:27.087 +70:00:45.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0267 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  09:36:26.321 +70:00:41.73
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:27.087 +70:00:45.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00159 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00159 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FfcNS9l2hF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eAtpgHk97i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9jSvPV6XQA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xDpVNQkWdE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg
Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5117 out of 5413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5413 out of 8779 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.870000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.870000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.34

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.34

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg
Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5117 out of 5413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5413 out of 8779 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0326 to 171.9963 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0326 to 171.9963 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg
Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5133 out of 5416 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5416 out of 8894 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
 2.1 pix  UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.3 mag.  UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
 15.4 mag.  UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
 13.7 mag.  fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
 13.6 mag.  fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  13.6 (SNR )  11.2 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FfcNS9l2hF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=0, passed=8779
Got 8779 stars (including 8092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=1067 n_q2=1443 n_q3=1095 n_q4=1281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.381
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eAtpgHk97i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=664, bad_region=0, passed=8894
Got 8894 stars (including 8220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1066 n_q2=1431 n_q3=1117 n_q4=1272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.353
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9jSvPV6XQA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=178, bad_region=0, passed=3920
Got 3920 stars (including 3736 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3920 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3642 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3637 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3637 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3642 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3637 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3637 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 3637 stars left (next iteration limit 4000)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3637 robust_rms=11.442 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.105 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3637 robust_rms=0.505 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.547 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3637 robust_rms=0.377 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.453 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3637 robust_rms_before=0.996 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.323 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.377 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.404 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.453
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.404 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits N_match=3637 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=1036 n_q2=1022 n_q3=887 n_q4=692 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xDpVNQkWdE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=179, bad_region=0, passed=3911
Got 3911 stars (including 3726 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3911 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3638 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3634 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3634 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3634 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3638 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3634 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3634 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 3634 stars left (next iteration limit 3997)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3634 robust_rms=11.287 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.681 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3634 robust_rms=0.526 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.702 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3634 robust_rms=0.373 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.475 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3634 robust_rms_before=1.007 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.373 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.394 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.475
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.394 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits N_match=3634 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=1039 n_q2=1024 n_q3=887 n_q4=684 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.381
ref2=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.353
new1=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.193
new2=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.228
reference average sigma_overall=0.3675 worst_q_ratio=1.367
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122_astrometric_residuals.png (3637 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123_astrometric_residuals.png (3634 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 01412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    10.42    08:04:00.35 +73:24:29.0   8864 0615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  08:04:00.38 +73:24:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04047_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 04047_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    7.17    10:44:37.57 +68:46:32.3   1098 3206   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  10:44:37.56 +68:46:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    10.18    10:55:39.71 +71:52:06.9   1236 1253   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  10:55:39.72 +71:52:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:26.321 +70:00:41.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26
Second-epoch image center 09:36:26.321 +70:00:41.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0252 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:27.087 +70:00:45.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26
Second-epoch image center 09:36:27.087 +70:00:45.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0267 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  09:36:26.321 +70:00:41.73
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:27.087 +70:00:45.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00159 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00159 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FkhlNJTrOY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ba90MH1Bwg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7MBrEAN901
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KM8WUvHJFU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec +62.8119 to +75.4848 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec 62.8119 to 75.4848 deg
Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4865 out of 5490 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5490 out of 51532 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.25
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.50

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.50

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec +62.8119 to +75.4848 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec 62.8119 to 75.4848 deg
Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4865 out of 5490 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5490 out of 51532 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 51887 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.6991 to 172.5281 deg, Dec +62.8124 to +75.4915 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.6991 to 172.5281 deg, Dec 62.8124 to 75.4915 deg
Loaded 9544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4853 out of 5491 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5491 out of 51887 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 1.9 pix  UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
 1.9 pix  UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
 15.5 mag.  UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
 14.1 mag.  fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
 14.1 mag.  fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.1 (SNR )  13.7 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FkhlNJTrOY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2624, bad_region=3, passed=51519
Got 51519 stars (including 48797 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1073 n_q2=1412 n_q3=1115 n_q4=1294 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.422
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ba90MH1Bwg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2687, bad_region=5, passed=51863
Got 51863 stars (including 49074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51863 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=1092 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1115 n_q4=1292 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.361
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7MBrEAN901 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=914, bad_region=7, passed=24136
Got 24136 stars (including 23181 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24136 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=1408 n_q2=1423 n_q3=1156 n_q4=897 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KM8WUvHJFU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=647, bad_region=10, passed=23686
Got 23686 stars (including 22993 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23686 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5375)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits N_match=4887 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=1422 n_q2=1405 n_q3=1168 n_q4=892 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:05:10.50 +74:42:25.9:  13.56 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:05:10.50 +74:42:25.9:  13.55 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:05:10.50 +74:42:25.9: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5884 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65339_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65339_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.27    08:46:54.00 +74:28:06.7   6955 0422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  08:46:53.98 +74:28:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65341_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65341_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 04.18629    2461256.68629    13.58    10:05:10.22 +74:42:27.7   3826 0230   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.60    10:05:10.77 +74:42:24.2   3826 0231   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65348_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65348_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    11.05    10:01:20.63 +74:13:23.3   3929 0548   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  10:01:20.61 +74:13:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65404_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65404_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    10.12    09:25:03.56 +66:20:55.9   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65419_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65419_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    10.30    08:16:51.00 +71:47:40.8   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65423_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65423_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    10.80    10:54:21.20 +69:31:06.3   0762 2600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65449_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65449_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    10.48    08:15:21.30 +68:59:51.9   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65464_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65464_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    10.89    09:42:02.60 +65:29:57.5   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65473_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65473_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    11.60    10:54:14.00 +71:24:43.3   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65482_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65482_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    11.60    10:53:04.98 +70:34:54.3   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65520_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65520_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    11.77    09:34:59.87 +72:50:01.7   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65556_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65556_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    11.48    09:30:47.68 +67:09:41.6   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65630_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65630_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    11.89    09:51:17.88 +66:54:24.3   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65696_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65696_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    11.89    09:38:07.45 +64:55:58.0   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65704_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65704_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    11.94    08:20:04.20 +67:17:18.2   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65731_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65731_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    12.39    09:12:30.86 +70:38:26.6   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65757_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65757_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    12.93    10:41:52.29 +70:49:46.8   1646 2079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65835_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65835_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.26    10:41:36.77 +72:42:46.3   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65856_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65856_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.25    10:51:52.38 +69:46:06.2   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65858_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65858_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    12.88    10:49:00.76 +65:54:05.4   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65886_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65886_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    12.51    08:32:41.85 +69:20:07.5   8144 3361   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  08:32:41.90 +69:20:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65887_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65887_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.49    11:04:34.87 +72:01:36.9   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65934_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 65934_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    12.84    08:23:36.84 +72:21:38.7   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66033_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66033_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.32    10:47:52.42 +65:28:26.6   0225 5033   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  10:47:52.59 +65:28:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66049_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66049_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.16    09:34:07.87 +69:50:57.6   4903 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  09:34:08.09 +69:50:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66070_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66070_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.20    08:50:43.53 +73:45:56.7   6854 0867   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  08:50:43.97 +73:45:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66074_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66074_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.12    09:51:06.12 +67:49:45.2   3880 4432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66167_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66167_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.43    10:14:31.98 +69:58:28.2   2845 2949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66219_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66219_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.35    10:24:02.56 +65:56:24.4   1744 5196   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66240_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66240_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.46    09:22:45.54 +73:33:03.2   5503 1086   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  09:22:45.63 +73:33:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66249_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66249_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.24    09:26:31.83 +66:06:11.7   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66250_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66250_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    14.08    10:50:40.64 +70:15:00.6   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66290_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66290_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.81    11:04:43.45 +71:21:40.3   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66303_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66303_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.35    10:49:16.23 +66:23:23.9   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66309_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66309_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.26    10:37:40.48 +65:07:19.1   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66319_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66319_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.23    10:24:55.89 +64:05:40.1   1398 6272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66329_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66329_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.09    08:15:41.58 +68:44:27.5   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66335_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66335_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    14.18    11:02:05.10 +71:33:17.3   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66343_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66343_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.26    10:00:15.99 +65:41:50.8   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66349_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66349_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.49    10:53:07.72 +66:37:14.8   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66388_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66388_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.73    10:47:42.91 +72:30:35.7   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66398_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66398_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.37    10:43:34.13 +64:35:16.5   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66425_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66425_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.90    10:32:51.81 +64:05:09.7   0885 6139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66460_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66460_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.81    08:39:36.52 +72:30:04.7   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66475_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66475_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    14.14    11:13:22.58 +70:51:31.0   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66476_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66476_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.97    10:17:43.71 +73:40:31.8   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66504_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 66504_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    13.62    09:20:38.90 +72:37:58.3   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44723_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 44723_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    12.91    08:50:31.57 +67:26:25.5   7347 4651   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  08:50:31.65 +67:26:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36110_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 36110_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    12.09    09:54:49.92 +65:11:14.0   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    10.32    08:04:00.27 +73:24:29.3   8864 0615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  08:04:00.28 +73:24:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    10.82    10:55:39.72 +71:52:06.9   1236 1253   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  10:55:39.72 +71:52:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23625_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 23625_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    12.57    09:36:19.83 +70:43:23.0   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02575_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 02575_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    12.40    09:22:26.38 +74:56:01.4   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    7.33    10:44:37.49 +68:46:32.1   1098 3206   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  10:44:37.51 +68:46:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45499_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 45499_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    6.71    09:02:33.04 +67:37:49.0   6644 4608   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  09:02:33.03 +67:37:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43174_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 43174_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    6.76    09:10:23.70 +67:08:03.2   6207 4934   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  09:10:23.67 +67:08:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41750_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 41750_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    6.75    09:08:23.67 +66:52:24.5   6333 5086   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  09:08:23.65 +66:52:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33021_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 33021_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    6.67    08:39:11.63 +65:01:17.9   8257 6001   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  08:39:11.66 +65:01:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49084_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 49084_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.18675    2461256.68675    6.61    08:12:49.00 +68:28:27.4   9333 3607   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits

**** FOUND  08:12:49.00 +68:28:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
Source monitoring: measuring positions from /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-08-03_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_233521_TTUQ1b1x1_1217231_WxqsaJR5/monitoring_positions.txt
Read 24143 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.1293 to 172.6379 deg, Dec +63.3319 to +75.3300 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.1293 to 172.6379 deg, Dec 63.3319 to 75.3300 deg
Loaded 9085 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5304 out of 5503 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5503 out of 24143 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits via Tycho-2
util/pixel_flux_airmass_correction processing wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Observation time (mid-exposure, UTC): JD 2461256.68629 (FITS header)
Observing site: lat= +33.748056 deg  lon= -101.958333 deg east-positive (SITELAT/SITELONG FITS header keywords)
Frame center (pixel 4788.5 3194.5): RA= 144.11225 deg  Dec= +70.01237 deg
Frame center: alt= +18.998 deg  az= 341.978 deg  airmass= 3.0384
Header cross-check: CENTALT= 18.988 deg (difference +0.010 deg)
Header cross-check: AIRMASS= 3.0479 (we compute 3.0384)
Airmass zero-point fit: OK  k= +0.5251 +/- 0.0043 mag/airmass  N= 4053  airmass span 2.1482-5.1839  scatter 0.1616 mag
Source monitoring: airmass zero-point for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits: OK +1.634082 -0.525130 3.0384 +0.5251 4053 3.0358 0.1616 2.1482 5.1839
Read 23693 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.1301 to 172.6383 deg, Dec +63.3315 to +75.3395 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.1301 to 172.6383 deg, Dec 63.3315 to 75.3395 deg
Loaded 9092 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5302 out of 5492 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5492 out of 23693 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits via Tycho-2
util/pixel_flux_airmass_correction processing wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Observation time (mid-exposure, UTC): JD 2461256.68675 (FITS header)
Observing site: lat= +33.748056 deg  lon= -101.958333 deg east-positive (SITELAT/SITELONG FITS header keywords)
Frame center (pixel 4788.5 3194.5): RA= 144.11544 deg  Dec= +70.01352 deg
Frame center: alt= +18.963 deg  az= 342.033 deg  airmass= 3.0437
Header cross-check: CENTALT= 18.951 deg (difference +0.012 deg)
Header cross-check: AIRMASS= 3.0536 (we compute 3.0437)
Airmass zero-point fit: OK  k= +0.5259 +/- 0.0043 mag/airmass  N= 4049  airmass span 2.1402-5.1971  scatter 0.1631 mag
Source monitoring: airmass zero-point for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-28-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits: OK +1.642006 -0.525916 3.0437 +0.5259 4049 3.0569 0.1631 2.1402 5.1971
########### Completed UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461256.68628626 -observatory V36
07:34:58.88 +20:17:41.1 Mercury (-0.1mag)
11:48:23.29 +00:55:42.9 Venus (-4.3mag)
05:37:29.92 +23:28:13.3 Mars (1.3mag)
08:39:17.78 +18:54:41.6 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:39.30 +03:18:02.4 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:11:14.51 +20:55:41.1 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:19.22 +00:14:46.4 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:28:31.79 -23:28:36.0 Pluto (14.4mag)
01:00:28.21 +09:48:17.5 Moon (-11.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug  3 23:38 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461256.68628626:
08:39:24.84 +18:54:12.8 Io (6.0mag)
08:39:19.24 +18:54:36.7 Europa (6.3mag)
08:39:05.50 +18:55:33.2 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:38:52.22 +18:56:30.1 Callisto (6.7mag)
08:36:56.22 +18:51:38.5 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:39:16.07 +18:54:49.6 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:36:25.51 +18:50:57.9 Elara (17.7mag)
08:43:22.42 +18:36:04.8 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:42:44.57 +19:04:06.4 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:46.38 +03:18:18.0 Titan (8.4mag)
00:56:44.17 +03:17:53.5 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:37.05 +03:16:04.7 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:56:32.82 +03:18:29.6 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:56:06.99 +03:11:45.4 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug  3 23:38 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461256.68628626:
18:48:14.99 -25:00:47.0 JWST
18:18:30.66 +27:58:00.1 Chandra
09:09:22.42 -51:38:15.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug  3 23:38 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461256.68628626 -observatory V36
03:08:59.78 +17:01:42.4 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:03:07.45 -34:38:52.2 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:49:59.84 -68:45:24.3 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:08:43.22 +32:54:33.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:31:22.12 +35:41:25.2 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:41:55.51 +31:40:25.3 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:39:24.74 +26:36:32.9 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:17:50.33 +28:39:06.9 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:26:09.13 +05:17:13.9 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:11:52.48 -12:07:54.6 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:16:10.60 +66:25:58.0 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:52:08.89 -12:33:24.1 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:03:30.16 +31:09:52.4 15.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:07:41.65 +15:37:10.6 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:08:18.80 +42:48:55.4 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:16:36.88 +48:55:44.6 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:11:50.74 -13:01:30.7 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:53:32.26 +24:51:46.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:29:00.85 -15:35:49.0 17.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:27:20.60 +21:09:19.8 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:55:46.41 +02:36:45.9 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:04:48.67 +78:11:42.2 16.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:05:48.03 +46:05:52.4 17.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:43:30.08 +08:06:15.5 17.2mag A/2026 E1
21:53:44.74 -25:34:15.8 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:26:34.28 -03:09:17.2 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:34:10.49 +32:04:15.6 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:59:26.56 +05:57:49.8 17.2mag 63P/Wild
00:54:17.71 -05:18:50.2 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
05:26:19.29 +20:44:57.5 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:41:38.20 -23:03:01.3 17.9mag 84P/Giclas
02:56:32.62 +13:22:26.7 16.6mag 88P/Howell
07:45:26.64 +28:11:28.3 16.1mag 93P/Lovas
03:55:06.13 +15:18:36.3 17.7mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
05:43:06.01 +30:41:41.8 16.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:08:53.12 +27:19:08.9 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:35:42.10 -08:42:32.9 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos
05:30:32.72 +21:11:12.3 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:21:32.57 +19:05:11.0 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:03:55.64 +03:25:47.0 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:21:58.19 -19:49:45.7 14.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:02:06.50 +37:32:58.3 15.8mag 162P/SidingSpring
16:22:33.75 +37:32:42.5 12.5mag 169P/NEAT
02:35:24.45 +09:25:14.9 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:39:39.96 -09:47:59.9 17.6mag 235P/LINEAR
20:25:12.69 -52:49:14.9 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
03:10:20.57 +23:26:21.4 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
06:53:08.69 +37:46:38.6 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:09:16.40 +03:34:50.4 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski
08:57:11.82 +18:34:20.9 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
08:29:43.62 +37:05:23.0 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug  3 23:38 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug  3 23:38 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug  3 23:38 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
00:30:19.249 +18:24:23.83  AT 2026uvg  2026-07-03.45 20.3378
02:34:07.458 +16:36:44.86  AT 2026uvf  2026-07-08.47 20.1237
05:51:16.620 -53:34:27.66  SN 2026uve  2026-07-14.17 17.677
14:40:13.463 -21:42:28.05  AT 2026uvd  2026-07-15.38 19.23
15:23:59.541 -29:29:57.56  AT 2026uvc  2026-07-15.38 20.26
14:05:43.115 -39:08:24.01  AT 2026uvb  2026-07-15.39 19.73
13:43:05.573 -20:04:24.22  AT 2026uva  2026-07-15.37 19.18
15:22:34.470 -05:37:40.51  AT 2026uuz  2026-07-15.39 19.82
16:09:54.586 +00:47:42.41  AT 2026uuy  2026-07-15.44 20.09
19:33:35.563 -39:15:48.22  AT 2026uux  2026-07-14.41 20.62
00:40:10.620 -43:16:14.80  AT 2026uuw  2026-06-26.42 21.69
01:06:29.115 +11:42:11.17  AT 2026uuv  2026-07-11.21 20.08
16:51:06.135 +20:55:05.41  AT 2026uuu  2026-07-10.91 20.4
13:34:34.622 +55:47:04.76  AT 2026uut  2026-07-14.76 19.13
13:51:15.996 +56:24:21.13  AT 2026uus  2026-07-14.76 19.68
15:20:47.992 +45:03:38.57  AT 2026uur  2026-07-14.77 19.22
17:15:43.403 +47:21:24.62  AT 2026uuq  2026-07-14.76 19.19
17:01:52.196 +41:26:22.21  AT 2026uup  2026-07-14.78 19.77
15:45:07.966 +53:24:05.89  AT 2026uuo  2026-07-14.82 19.85
17:58:55.437 +44:40:19.09  AT 2026uun  2026-07-14.88 18.67
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Aug  3 23:38 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Mon Aug  3 23:37:06 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 5 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 3 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 3 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 4 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 22s (0.37 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 51s (0.85 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 10s (0.17 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 2s (0.03 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 91s (1.52 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 11 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 3 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 3 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 5 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 25s (0.42 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 14s (0.23 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 2s (0.03 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 46s (0.77 min)
FIELD_UMa-01-Q1b1x1: 170s (2.83 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 186s (3.10 min)
Finished: Mon Aug  3 23:40:12 CDT 2026