Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 04.1604  2461256.6604  11.15  00:54:34.99 +54:26:36.6
123.39414  -8.42543 galactic  Cas  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 0.7 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 0"  MM Cas                        
Type: EA/SD
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    11.270   V            12.160   V         2456602.74800          1.158480000000   F                            
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:54:34.99 +54:26:36.6:  12.15 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:54:34.99 +54:26:36.6:  12.17 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.16 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits


Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits


fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits


fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs   wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits -crosshair 7438.48340 2970.32861 image    wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits -crosshair 7442.60596 2970.23242 image    wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits -crosshair 2108.85791 3467.65771 image    wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits -crosshair 2108.50488 3468.23145 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 04.16041 00 54 34.99 +54 26 36.6          11.2 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 04.16017 00 54 34.99 +54 26 36.8          11.2 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 04.16064 00 54 34.98 +54 26 36.4          11.2 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 04.1604*  00 54 34.99 +54 26 36.6  11.2 U             Cas       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
MM Cas,2461256.6604,11.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
MM Cas 20260804.1604 11.15CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cas-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Field Cas-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Field Cas-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
Field Cas-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461082.60540762 11.02.2026 02:31:37.218   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
First image: 2461082.60540762 11.02.2026 02:31:37.218   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Last  image: 2461256.66064404 04.08.2026 03:51:09.645   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  28302
Objects passed selection criteria:  28156
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 19751.2
Average stars matched: 19273.8 (97.5824 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   253084 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Aug  3 23:05:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Cas-05-Q1b1x1 after completing the measurements (memory cleanup crash); the transient search continues.
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 2
Ref.  image: 2461082.60540762 11.02.2026 02:31:37.218   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
First image: 2461082.60540762 11.02.2026 02:31:37.218   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Last  image: 2461082.60592581 11.02.2026 02:32:21.990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 72 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  198171
Objects passed selection criteria:  197182
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.0    2.0    2    2
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.0    2.0    2    2
Average stars detected per image: 217326
Average stars matched: 207562 (95.5072 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   658884 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Aug  3 23:08:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
***** IMAGE PROCESSING ERROR (less than 4 images processed) *****
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cas-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cas-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cas-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 350987 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 350987 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.png' -> 'transient_report/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits_preview.png'

Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits


renamed 'Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.png' -> 'transient_report/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits_preview.png'

Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 655.2823
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 869.2836
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1728.2118
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 564.6680
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1724.7504
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 564.9791
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.63735
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-03T22:50:29.0813397' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-04T03:50:29.0813397' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =      61256.160058808 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-04T03:50:38.9838108' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61256.1601734143 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     21.1736443547192 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     54.0000848711634 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     15.0127777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =                33.91 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.80746473934046 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cas-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 24 42'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29526 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29526 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/d_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits :)

Spent 0.854170 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/d_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-03T22:51:09.6454427' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-04T03:51:09.6454427' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61256.1605282985 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-04T03:51:19.5498019' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61256.1606429284 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     21.1736442769578 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     54.0000848486615 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     15.0894444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     33.9713888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.78912453148725 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cas-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 24 42'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29526 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29526 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/d_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits :)

Spent 0.994908 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/d_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits



fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461256.66017455
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.0'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:24:35.483 +53:59:24.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
Image size: 944.6'x627.0'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:25:00.539 +53:58:12.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:24:35.483 +53:59:24.91
Second-epoch image center 01:25:00.539 +53:58:12.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0646 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Image size: 944.5'x627.0'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:25:00.682 +53:58:08.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:24:35.483 +53:59:24.91
Second-epoch image center 01:25:00.682 +53:58:08.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0653 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  01:25:00.539 +53:58:12.28
Second-epoch second image center 01:25:00.682 +53:58:08.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00116 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00116 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pTfAaheJzt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TsHsyWdFvA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nHTuQAMFi3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kaEYqMcXFC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.6208 to 36.4936 deg, Dec +47.7183 to +59.3714 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.6208 to 36.4936 deg, Dec 47.7183 to 59.3714 deg
Loaded 24495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15177 out of 17024 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17024 out of 30398 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.893200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.893200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.15

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.15

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.6208 to 36.4936 deg, Dec +47.7183 to +59.3714 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.6208 to 36.4936 deg, Dec 47.7183 to 59.3714 deg
Loaded 24495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15177 out of 17024 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17024 out of 30398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 30267 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.6206 to 36.4936 deg, Dec +47.7183 to +59.3740 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.6206 to 36.4936 deg, Dec 47.7183 to 59.3740 deg
Loaded 24499 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15196 out of 17027 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17027 out of 30267 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
 2.1 pix  Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
 2.6 pix  fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
 2.6 pix  fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.2 mag.  Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
 15.2 mag.  Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
 13.7 mag.  fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
 13.7 mag.  fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  13.7 (SNR )  11.1 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pTfAaheJzt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3534, bad_region=0, passed=30398
Got 30398 stars (including 26827 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1364 n_q2=1359 n_q3=1052 n_q4=1133 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits -region wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TsHsyWdFvA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3522, bad_region=0, passed=30267
Got 30267 stars (including 26698 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30267 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1340 n_q2=1363 n_q3=1055 n_q4=1142 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nHTuQAMFi3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=468, bad_region=0, passed=9358
Got 9358 stars (including 8879 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9358 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=6.044 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=24.790 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.462 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.722 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.358 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.468 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=1.367 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.385 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.358 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.468 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.468
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.468 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=1344 n_q2=479 n_q3=1924 n_q4=1126 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kaEYqMcXFC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=461, bad_region=0, passed=9464
Got 9464 stars (including 8989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9464 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 4872 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=6.158 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=24.498 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.499 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.792 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.514 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4872 robust_rms_before=1.435 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.383 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.493 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.514
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.493 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits N_match=4872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=1340 n_q2=489 n_q3=1911 n_q4=1132 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.205
ref2=Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits sigma_overall=0.405 worst_q_ratio=1.233
new1=fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.216
new2=fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.130
reference average sigma_overall=0.4 worst_q_ratio=1.219
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016_astrometric_residuals.png (4908 matched stars from wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083_astrometric_residuals.png (4872 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:54:34.99 +54:26:36.6:  12.15 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:54:34.99 +54:26:36.6:  12.17 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:54:34.99 +54:26:36.6: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1545 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16385.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51838_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 51838_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.16064    2461256.66064    9.66    00:36:01.49 +57:54:42.7   0712 5701   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits

**** FOUND  00:36:01.51 +57:54:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51868_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 51868_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.16064    2461256.66064    10.24    02:18:55.56 +57:09:16.6   9057 5814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits

**** FOUND  02:18:55.55 +57:09:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51888_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 51888_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.16064    2461256.66064    11.15    01:22:51.44 +57:50:34.0   4485 5516   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits

**** FOUND  01:22:51.46 +57:50:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50216_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 50216_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.16064    2461256.66064    11.07    01:12:26.02 +54:50:08.1   3672 3676   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits

**** FOUND  01:12:25.98 +54:50:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21610_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 21610_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.16064    2461256.66064    10.29    01:12:45.38 +52:27:24.6   3718 2245   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits

**** FOUND  01:12:45.37 +52:27:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07175_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 07175_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.16064    2461256.66064    10.10    00:38:06.74 +57:12:03.9   0835 5250   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits

**** FOUND  00:38:06.72 +57:12:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13015_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 13015_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.16064    2461256.66064    11.31    00:59:14.60 +55:35:07.0   2542 4140   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits

**** FOUND  00:59:14.61 +55:35:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00816_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 00816_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.16064    2461256.66064    9.33    02:01:28.06 +58:18:13.4   7516 6174   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits

**** FOUND  02:01:28.05 +58:18:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30009_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 30009_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.16064    2461256.66064    9.17    00:51:39.31 +49:20:46.8   1657 0398   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits

**** FOUND  00:51:39.34 +49:20:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18634_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 18634_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.16064    2461256.66064    10.52    00:48:10.29 +53:34:02.2   1504 2974   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits

**** FOUND  00:48:10.30 +53:34:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16385_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
Preparing report for the candidate 16385_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24734_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 24734_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.16064    2461256.66064    6.26    01:43:39.18 +50:41:19.7   6669 1385   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits

**** FOUND  01:43:39.19 +50:41:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:54:34.99 +54:26:36.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
  
Last  image: 2461256.66017455 04.08.2026 03:50:29.081 UTC
WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Cas-05-Q1b1x1 AFTER completing the measurements. This is a memory-management crash during cleanup (a VaST bug to report), NOT a wrong field / clouds / bad focus. The lightcurves were written, so the transient search continues.
____ VaST output (crashed during memory cleanup; the measurements above are complete) ____

--==VaST 1.0rc90==--

Parsing command line arguments...
opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor
opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius!
opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching!
opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source!
opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted!
opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope)
opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag!
WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars.
opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done!
opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually!
opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored!
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images

Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ...

Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found.
This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file.
Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5)...  OK
Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor
Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files.
Done with cleaning!

 VaST was started with the following command line: 
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 


Preparing to process 4 input FITS images...


######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ########
transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search!
transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search!
transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit
transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!!
transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3
transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars
transient search mode: not discarding large sources
################
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix
We have 4 images to process.
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits catalog from cache
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits catalog from cache
Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads...
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Parent process says: we are done fork()ing.
Waiting for thread 2 to finish...
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.1,5.1,4.6,5.7,6.2,6.7 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.1,5.1,4.6,5.6,6.2,6.7 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
Waiting for thread 1 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits


Done with SExtractor!

TIMING SExtractor: 42 seconds


Matching stars between images!

No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine.
Processing  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-11T02:31:37.2188623
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-11T02:31:37.2188623

Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-02-11T02:31:37.218
EXPTIME = 20.000

Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Exposure 20 sec, 11.02.2026 02:31:37.218 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461082.60540762 mid. exp.
The reference image star  1812.656   168.833 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  1328.178   616.988 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  4002.053  1324.740 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star   354.832  1873.244 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  2318.062  4329.987 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  1547.506  5511.961 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  9265.667  4880.659 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  2347.289  4747.911 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  1980.436  6113.446 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
SExtractor output filtering results:
 * passed selection: 216953, (216953 good for image matching)
 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 64
 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 9
 * rejected close to frame edge: 1100
 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0
 * rejected as being too large (>4.6 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 17
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.

Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied.
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.42
Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.4  (5.0 sigma detection)
The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.6
80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -8.0
Selected detection limit= -8.0
Final detection limit= -8.0 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0)

Parameter box for transient search:    10.04.6 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 15
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
    217699 * detected, using  501/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.018314, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3987 
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=1 pairs=198171 inliers=198171 rms 0.31 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.018333, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3991 
198171 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=198171 inliers=198171 rms 0.31 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.018333, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3991 
198171 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=198171 inliers=198171 rms 0.31 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.018333, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3991 
198171 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
  rotation [degrees] =   0.009
    217699 stars detected, 198171 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 161996, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 161996 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 161993 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
 delta_m = 0.00000*X_pix -0.00000*Y_pix -0.00300
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 155892 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.42
    236481 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory:  380348 kB used, 410868 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
Total number of measurements 434652 (434652 measurements stored in RAM)
sorting the measurements cached in memory,
writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%)



Processing  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-04T03:50:29.0813397
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-04T03:50:29.0813397

Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-08-04T03:50:29.081
EXPTIME = 20.000

Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
The star  1812.285   166.191 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star   887.247  1373.718 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  2636.867  2104.659 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  9337.001  3591.001 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  6968.827  5032.630 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
SExtractor output filtering results:
 * passed selection: 69378
 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 3
 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 5
 * rejected close to frame edge: 334
 * rejected as being too small (<1.3 pix): 0
 * rejected as being too large (>5.1 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 77
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
    69378 * detected, using  159/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001641, number_of_ambiguous_matches=388 
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=66942 inliers=66942 rms 2.04 -> 0.81 pix, max corner correction 9.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000427, number_of_ambiguous_matches=101 
68340 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=3 pairs=68340 inliers=68340 rms 0.65 -> 0.39 pix, max corner correction 10.2 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000385, number_of_ambiguous_matches=91 
68730 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=3 pairs=68730 inliers=68730 rms 0.34 -> 0.28 pix, max corner correction 3.7 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000393, number_of_ambiguous_matches=93 
68767 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
  rotation [degrees] = -179.073
    69378 stars detected, 68767 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 51261, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 51261 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 47955 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
 delta_m = 0.00011*X_pix -0.00007*Y_pix -0.08086
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 47955 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.78
 ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. 
    236481 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
memory:  505496 kB used, 658884 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%)



Processing  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-04T03:51:09.6454427
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-04T03:51:09.6454427

Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-08-04T03:51:09.645
EXPTIME = 20.000

Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
The star  1812.097   166.742 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star   886.940  1374.376 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star   352.813  1876.006 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  2636.593  2105.521 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  1455.000  3133.026 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  9337.003  3591.006 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  2175.146  3858.904 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
SExtractor output filtering results:
 * passed selection: 70275
 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 6
 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 7
 * rejected close to frame edge: 327
 * rejected as being too small (<1.3 pix): 0
 * rejected as being too large (>5.1 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 91
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
    70275 * detected, using  161/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.005941, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1405 
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=67994 inliers=67994 rms 3.14 -> 1.37 pix, max corner correction 10.3 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000368, number_of_ambiguous_matches=87 
69565 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=3 pairs=69565 inliers=69565 rms 0.55 -> 0.29 pix, max corner correction 5.3 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000347, number_of_ambiguous_matches=82 
69638 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=69638 inliers=69638 rms 0.30 -> 0.30 pix, max corner correction 0.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000347, number_of_ambiguous_matches=82 
69638 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
  rotation [degrees] = -179.034
    70275 stars detected, 69638 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 51967, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 51967 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 48651 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
 delta_m = 0.00011*X_pix -0.00007*Y_pix -0.08268
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 48651 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.78
 ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. 
    236481 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
memory:  505892 kB used, 658884 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%)
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 14 seconds
Done with measurements! =)

Total number of measurements 434652 (0 measurements stored in RAM)
Freeing up some memory...  Sorting the measurements cached in memory...
Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory...
Creating vast_image_details.log ... 

Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ...  OK
Selecting the best aperture for each source
Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 31291 stars
Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for     0 stars
Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 51819 stars
Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 44553 stars
Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 24834 stars
Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 45674 stars

done!  =)
TIMING select_aperture: 13 seconds
Computing lightcurve statistics...  Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve
You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make'

Computing, please wait a bit
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 197182 objects, the longest string is 385 bytes.
Allocating memory for resorting the file.



----***** VaST processing WARNING *****----
You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one.
Please investigate this!



**************************************************************
This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by 
inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic
messages printed above (or the vast*.log files):
 * How many of the input images are matched?
 * Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable?
 * Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent?

You may run
 ./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit
to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings
(star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration
file, see various examples in the VaST directory).

If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky 
Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log
file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please 
upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/
**************************************************************

Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1)
_____________________
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Last  image: 2461256.66017455 04.08.2026 03:50:29.081 UTC
ERROR running VaST on the field Cas-05-Q1b1x1 (less than 4 images processed)
exp_start= 11.02.2026 02:31:37.218  exp=   20.000  JD= 2461082.60540762  ap=  4.6  rotation=   0.000  *detected= 216953  *matched= 216953  status=OK     /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
exp_start= 11.02.2026 02:32:21.990  exp=   20.000  JD= 2461082.60592581  ap=  4.6  rotation=   0.009  *detected= 217699  *matched= 198171  status=OK     /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
exp_start= 04.08.2026 03:50:29.081  exp=   20.000  JD= 2461256.66017455  ap=  5.1  rotation= -179.073  *detected= 69378  *matched= 68767  status=ERROR  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-50-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
exp_start= 04.08.2026 03:51:09.645  exp=   20.000  JD= 2461256.66064404  ap=  5.1  rotation= -179.034  *detected= 70275  *matched= 69638  status=ERROR  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_225710_TTUQ1b1x1_511213_RnVH7YE5/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-51-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
########### Completed Cas-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
00:54:34.99 +54:26:36.6
###################################################################################
00:54:34.99 +54:26:36.6  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
00:54:34.99 +54:26:36.6  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
00:54:34.99 +54:26:36.6  -- a known variable star
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
00:54:34.99 +54:26:36.6
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461256.66017455 -observatory V36
07:34:51.21 +20:17:34.1 Mercury (-0.1mag)
11:48:17.63 +00:56:29.0 Venus (-4.3mag)
05:37:25.29 +23:28:09.5 Mars (1.3mag)
08:39:16.35 +18:54:46.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:39.37 +03:18:03.3 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:11:14.31 +20:55:40.6 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:19.30 +00:14:47.0 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:28:31.94 -23:28:35.3 Pluto (14.4mag)
00:59:03.81 +09:37:45.1 Moon (-11.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug  3 23:05 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461256.66017455:
08:39:23.15 +18:54:19.2 Io (6.0mag)
08:39:17.35 +18:54:43.8 Europa (6.3mag)
08:39:04.26 +18:55:37.5 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:38:50.73 +18:56:35.5 Callisto (6.7mag)
08:36:54.83 +18:51:42.7 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:39:15.00 +18:54:53.4 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:36:24.10 +18:51:02.5 Elara (17.7mag)
08:43:20.97 +18:36:10.8 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:42:43.25 +19:04:11.2 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:46.55 +03:18:18.7 Titan (8.4mag)
00:56:44.23 +03:17:53.9 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:37.04 +03:16:05.4 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:56:33.01 +03:18:30.5 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:56:07.10 +03:11:46.5 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug  3 23:05 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461256.66017455:
18:48:17.63 -25:01:20.3 JWST
18:17:44.45 +28:41:55.3 Chandra
08:59:19.78 -50:31:44.3 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug  3 23:05 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461256.66017455 -observatory V36
03:08:57.90 +17:01:33.9 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:03:08.07 -34:38:52.5 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:49:58.34 -68:45:21.2 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:08:42.77 +32:54:32.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:31:16.93 +35:40:33.5 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:41:56.78 +31:40:30.0 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:39:23.12 +26:36:34.4 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:17:48.88 +28:39:11.2 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:26:08.08 +05:17:13.4 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:11:52.29 -12:07:51.2 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:16:12.76 +66:26:06.8 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:52:10.69 -12:33:15.2 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:03:28.34 +31:09:48.3 15.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:07:41.98 +15:37:10.7 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:08:20.87 +42:48:48.1 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:16:39.14 +48:55:37.2 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:11:49.43 -13:01:32.3 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:53:31.17 +24:52:03.0 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:29:00.09 -15:35:36.8 17.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:27:18.46 +21:09:25.6 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:55:45.53 +02:36:51.9 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:04:49.83 +78:11:50.3 16.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:05:47.25 +46:05:50.0 17.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:43:28.82 +08:06:04.9 17.2mag A/2026 E1
21:53:43.00 -25:33:33.4 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:26:33.37 -03:09:11.6 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:34:08.47 +32:04:06.7 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:59:23.34 +05:58:20.6 17.2mag 63P/Wild
00:54:17.67 -05:18:47.3 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
05:26:15.65 +20:44:58.1 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:41:39.66 -23:02:49.8 17.9mag 84P/Giclas
02:56:30.87 +13:22:18.8 16.6mag 88P/Howell
07:45:22.50 +28:11:40.3 16.1mag 93P/Lovas
03:55:01.78 +15:18:00.0 17.7mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
05:43:00.76 +30:41:49.5 16.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:08:49.36 +27:19:24.2 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:35:39.00 -08:41:56.5 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos
05:30:30.34 +21:11:12.2 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:21:29.81 +19:05:15.0 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:03:55.79 +03:25:47.1 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:21:58.39 -19:49:49.4 14.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:02:00.96 +37:32:51.4 15.8mag 162P/SidingSpring
16:22:57.44 +37:31:06.2 12.5mag 169P/NEAT
02:35:21.37 +09:25:11.9 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:39:39.33 -09:47:53.3 17.6mag 235P/LINEAR
20:25:13.97 -52:49:12.1 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
03:10:15.95 +23:25:40.3 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
06:53:03.89 +37:46:39.4 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:09:15.99 +03:35:00.6 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski
08:57:10.38 +18:34:25.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
08:29:41.29 +37:05:31.3 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug  3 23:05 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug  3 23:05 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug  3 23:05 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
00:30:19.249 +18:24:23.83  AT 2026uvg  2026-07-03.45 20.3378
02:34:07.458 +16:36:44.86  AT 2026uvf  2026-07-08.47 20.1237
05:51:16.620 -53:34:27.66  SN 2026uve  2026-07-14.17 17.677
14:40:13.463 -21:42:28.05  AT 2026uvd  2026-07-15.38 19.23
15:23:59.541 -29:29:57.56  AT 2026uvc  2026-07-15.38 20.26
14:05:43.115 -39:08:24.01  AT 2026uvb  2026-07-15.39 19.73
13:43:05.573 -20:04:24.22  AT 2026uva  2026-07-15.37 19.18
15:22:34.470 -05:37:40.51  AT 2026uuz  2026-07-15.39 19.82
16:09:54.586 +00:47:42.41  AT 2026uuy  2026-07-15.44 20.09
19:33:35.563 -39:15:48.22  AT 2026uux  2026-07-14.41 20.62
00:40:10.620 -43:16:14.80  AT 2026uuw  2026-06-26.42 21.69
01:06:29.115 +11:42:11.17  AT 2026uuv  2026-07-11.21 20.08
16:51:06.135 +20:55:05.41  AT 2026uuu  2026-07-10.91 20.4
13:34:34.622 +55:47:04.76  AT 2026uut  2026-07-14.76 19.13
13:51:15.996 +56:24:21.13  AT 2026uus  2026-07-14.76 19.68
15:20:47.992 +45:03:38.57  AT 2026uur  2026-07-14.77 19.22
17:15:43.403 +47:21:24.62  AT 2026uuq  2026-07-14.76 19.19
17:01:52.196 +41:26:22.21  AT 2026uup  2026-07-14.78 19.77
15:45:07.966 +53:24:05.89  AT 2026uuo  2026-07-14.82 19.85
17:58:55.437 +44:40:19.09  AT 2026uun  2026-07-14.88 18.67
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Aug  3 23:05 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Mon Aug  3 23:04:20 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 7 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 3 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 4 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 16 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 40s (0.67 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 52s (0.87 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 28s (0.47 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 9s (0.15 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 136s (2.27 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 42 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 14 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 13 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 79s (1.32 min)
FIELD_Cas-05-Q1b1x1: 250s (4.17 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 266s (4.43 min)
Finished: Mon Aug  3 23:08:46 CDT 2026