Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 741,2461256.6425,9.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 741 20260804.1425 9.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cas-03-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cas-03-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cas-03-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 356114 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 356114 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.png' -> 'transient_report/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits_preview.png'
Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits

renamed 'Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.png' -> 'transient_report/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits_preview.png'
Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 583.7929
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 891.5391
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1606.7056
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 553.3744
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1604.2177
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 553.2720
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.75218
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-03T22:24:35.1918574' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-04T03:24:35.1918574' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61256.1420739698 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-04T03:24:45.0963365' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61256.142188611 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 25.7100669880012 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 62.0000653621894 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.8263888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 23.6983333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.62164242860102 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cas-03' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29526 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29526 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/d_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits :)
Spent 0.817184 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/d_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-03T22:25:21.3868878' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-04T03:25:21.3868878' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61256.1426086342 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-04T03:25:31.2881493' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61256.1427232409 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 25.7100668744271 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 62.0000653402444 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.8905555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 23.7633333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.60777528765445 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cas-03' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29526 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29526 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/d_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits :)
Spent 0.910827 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/d_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits

fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461256.64218971
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits'
wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:52.680 +61:59:53.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Image size: 943.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:43:05.825 +61:59:43.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:52.680 +61:59:53.79
Second-epoch image center 01:43:05.825 +61:59:43.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0259 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Image size: 943.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:43:07.419 +62:00:09.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:52.680 +61:59:53.79
Second-epoch image center 01:43:07.419 +62:00:09.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0292 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:43:05.825 +61:59:43.65
Second-epoch second image center 01:43:07.419 +62:00:09.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00792 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uzl0YJesaT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ym77VtsCVU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hXdIi7Sg1t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DBv5zO3Kxw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits and wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits and wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits and wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31559 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 7.0642 to 45.7654 deg, Dec +55.3344 to +67.4185 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 7.0642 to 45.7654 deg, Dec 55.3344 to 67.4185 deg
Loaded 26187 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14625 out of 16478 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16478 out of 31559 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.959100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.959100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31559 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 7.0642 to 45.7654 deg, Dec +55.3344 to +67.4185 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 7.0642 to 45.7654 deg, Dec 55.3344 to 67.4185 deg
Loaded 26187 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14625 out of 16478 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16478 out of 31559 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 29531 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.9029 to 45.8019 deg, Dec +55.3343 to +67.4223 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.9029 to 45.8019 deg, Dec 55.3343 to 67.4223 deg
Loaded 26317 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14657 out of 16329 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16329 out of 29531 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 14 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
2.1 pix Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
15.2 mag. Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uzl0YJesaT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3786, bad_region=1, passed=31559
Got 31559 stars (including 27743 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31559 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5416)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=867 n_q2=1024 n_q3=1523 n_q4=1509 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.347
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits -region wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ym77VtsCVU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3339, bad_region=1, passed=29531
Got 29531 stars (including 26164 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29531 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=872 n_q2=1031 n_q3=1518 n_q4=1500 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.331
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -region wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hXdIi7Sg1t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=437, bad_region=0, passed=9406
Got 9406 stars (including 8963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9406 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013106 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010484 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=6.236 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=33.578 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.588 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=0.395 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.481 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4895 robust_rms_before=1.260 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.424 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.395 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.511 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.481
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.511 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=1691 n_q2=899 n_q3=1494 n_q4=811 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DBv5zO3Kxw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=433, bad_region=0, passed=9469
Got 9469 stars (including 9028 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9469 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013106 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010484 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=6.332 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=32.819 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.492 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.672 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.503 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=1.280 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.419 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.391 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.503 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.503
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.503 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1682 n_q2=906 n_q3=1489 n_q4=804 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits sigma_overall=0.344 worst_q_ratio=1.347
ref2=Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.331
new1=fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits sigma_overall=0.410 worst_q_ratio=1.217
new2=fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits sigma_overall=0.405 worst_q_ratio=1.193
reference average sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.339
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_astrometric_residuals.png (4921 matched stars from wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055_astrometric_residuals.png (4881 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/wcs_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits at 02:12:27.83 +64:09:51.9: 10.37 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 02:12:27.83 +64:09:51.9: 10.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.28 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:12:27.83 +64:09:51.9: ref_mag=10.28 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.3383 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04389.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51248_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 51248_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 04.14272 | 2461256.64272 | 9.77 | 00:36:59.93 +63:08:02.4 | 0245 4199 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits |
**** FOUND 00:36:59.94 +63:08:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51312_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 51312_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 04.14272 | 2461256.64272 | 11.09 | 00:34:27.02 +64:32:52.1 | 0250 5078 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits |
**** FOUND 00:34:27.07 +64:32:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51374_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 51374_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 04.14272 | 2461256.64272 | 11.25 | 00:56:28.41 +60:47:09.9 | 1398 2571 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits |
**** FOUND 00:56:28.44 +60:47:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51397_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 51397_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 04.14272 | 2461256.64272 | 11.25 | 01:21:54.69 +61:20:55.3 | 3282 2776 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits |
**** FOUND 01:21:54.74 +61:20:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50443_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 50443_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 04.14272 | 2461256.64272 | 11.29 | 01:20:18.30 +64:28:06.4 | 3226 4658 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits |
**** FOUND 01:20:18.25 +64:28:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12304_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 12304_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 04.14272 | 2461256.64272 | 9.92 | 02:21:40.78 +60:54:41.0 | 7623 2911 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits |
**** FOUND 02:21:40.81 +60:54:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13896_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 13896_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 04.14272 | 2461256.64272 | 11.03 | 01:37:01.30 +61:15:57.8 | 4373 2733 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits |
**** FOUND 01:37:01.33 +61:15:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29658_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 29658_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 04.14272 | 2461256.64272 | 10.81 | 01:22:51.60 +57:50:34.6 | 3300 0659 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits |
**** FOUND 01:22:51.60 +57:50:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23244_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 23244_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 04.14272 | 2461256.64272 | 9.41 | 02:01:28.10 +58:18:14.4 | 6357 1105 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits |
**** FOUND 02:01:28.11 +58:18:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04389_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 04389_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08339_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 08339_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 04.14272 | 2461256.64272 | 10.87 | 02:20:32.79 +62:32:01.2 | 7348 3852 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits |
**** FOUND 02:20:32.76 +62:32:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20109_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 20109_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 04.14272 | 2461256.64272 | 8.66 | 01:56:38.09 +59:15:33.9 | 5915 1634 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits |
**** FOUND 01:56:38.11 +59:15:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06468_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 06468_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 04.14272 | 2461256.64272 | 6.67 | 01:54:23.60 +63:40:06.9 | 5483 4255 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits |
**** FOUND 01:54:23.59 +63:40:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21078_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21078_fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 04.14272 | 2461256.64272 | 6.57 | 01:33:56.00 +59:13:56.9 | 4173 1502 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits |
**** FOUND 01:33:56.02 +59:13:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
02:12:27.83 +64:09:51.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Last image: 2461256.64218971 04.08.2026 03:24:35.191 UTC
WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Cas-03-Q1b1x1 AFTER completing the measurements. This is a memory-management crash during cleanup (a VaST bug to report), NOT a wrong field / clouds / bad focus. The lightcurves were written, so the transient search continues.
____ VaST output (crashed during memory cleanup; the measurements above are complete) ____
--==VaST 1.0rc90==--
Parsing command line arguments...
opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor
opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius!
opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching!
opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source!
opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted!
opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope)
opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag!
WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars.
opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done!
opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually!
opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored!
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images
Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ...
Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found.
This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file.
Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g)... OK
Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor
Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files.
Done with cleaning!
VaST was started with the following command line:
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Preparing to process 4 input FITS images...
######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ########
transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search!
transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search!
transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit
transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!!
transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3
transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars
transient search mode: not discarding large sources
################
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix
We have 4 images to process.
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits catalog from cache
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits catalog from cache
Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads...
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
Parent process says: we are done fork()ing.
Waiting for thread 2 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
The above guess is bsex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1ased on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.4,5.4,4.8,5.9,6.4,7.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.4,5.4,4.8,5.9,6.4,7.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Waiting for thread 1 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Done with SExtractor!
TIMING SExtractor: 35 seconds
Matching stars between images!
No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine.
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-01-21T01:40:37.2142889
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-01-21T01:40:37.2142889
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-01-21T01:40:37.214
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Exposure 20 sec, 21.01.2026 01:40:37.214 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461061.56999090 mid. exp.
The reference image star 1157.993 135.970 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 1810.026 166.998 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8225.889 234.822 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8498.010 871.996 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 1152.026 919.052 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 191.270 1040.055 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 1199.260 1173.480 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 4001.011 1322.005 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 884.013 1377.007 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8275.031 1397.686 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 221349, (221348 good for image matching)
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 77
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 39
* rejected close to frame edge: 1078
* rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>4.6 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 13
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied.
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.36
Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.4 (5.0 sigma detection)
The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.6
80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.9
Selected detection limit= -7.9
Final detection limit= -7.9 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0)
Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.6 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 14
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
208272 * detected, using 470/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.014104, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3122
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=1 pairs=194666 inliers=194666 rms 0.30 -> 0.30 pix, max corner correction 0.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.014104, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3122
194667 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=194667 inliers=194667 rms 0.30 -> 0.30 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.014104, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3122
194667 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=194667 inliers=194667 rms 0.30 -> 0.30 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.014104, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3122
194667 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -0.139
208272 stars detected, 194667 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 158887, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 158887 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 158870 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = 0.00000*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix -0.02196
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 151600 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.41
234954 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory: 379200 kB used, 410232 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
Total number of measurements 429621 (429621 measurements stored in RAM)
sorting the measurements cached in memory,
writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-04T03:24:35.1918574
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-04T03:24:35.1918574
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-08-04T03:24:35.191
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
The star 9337.000 3591.000 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 2318.000 4331.999 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 6852.000 4571.998 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 66226
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 3
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 3
* rejected close to frame edge: 270
* rejected as being too small (<1.4 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>5.4 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 204
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
66226 * detected, using 149/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000924, number_of_ambiguous_matches=217
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=64042 inliers=64042 rms 1.69 -> 0.65 pix, max corner correction 8.6 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000392, number_of_ambiguous_matches=92
64797 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=3 pairs=64797 inliers=64797 rms 0.51 -> 0.32 pix, max corner correction 5.5 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000340, number_of_ambiguous_matches=80
64905 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=64905 inliers=64905 rms 0.30 -> 0.30 pix, max corner correction 0.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000340, number_of_ambiguous_matches=80
64906 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -177.600
66226 stars detected, 64906 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 48030, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 48030 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 45167 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = 0.00011*X_pix -0.00011*Y_pix -0.00387
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 45167 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.81
[01;31m ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. [33;00m
234954 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
The transient candidate (new frame position 7144.689 1547.081 ; ref frame position: 2344.570 4751.936) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position 6963.361 4194.304 ; ref frame position: 2640.321 2110.738) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
memory: 505228 kB used, 657736 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-04T03:25:21.3868878
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-04T03:25:21.3868878
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-08-04T03:25:21.386
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
The star 9336.999 3591.000 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 6852.013 4571.999 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 2318.001 4331.999 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 66429
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 9
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 3
* rejected close to frame edge: 286
* rejected as being too small (<1.4 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>5.4 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 168
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
66429 * detected, using 150/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001081, number_of_ambiguous_matches=254
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=64030 inliers=64030 rms 1.83 -> 0.66 pix, max corner correction 7.8 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000524, number_of_ambiguous_matches=123
64909 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=3 pairs=64909 inliers=64909 rms 0.57 -> 0.35 pix, max corner correction 6.2 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000489, number_of_ambiguous_matches=115
65067 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=3 pairs=65067 inliers=65067 rms 0.32 -> 0.30 pix, max corner correction 1.5 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000494, number_of_ambiguous_matches=116
65067 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -177.586
66429 stars detected, 65067 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 48169, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 48169 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 45342 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = 0.00011*X_pix -0.00011*Y_pix -0.00614
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 45342 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.81
[01;31m ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. [33;00m
234954 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
memory: 505360 kB used, 657736 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%)
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 27 seconds
Done with measurements! =)
Total number of measurements 429621 (0 measurements stored in RAM)
Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory...
Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory...
Creating vast_image_details.log ...
Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK
Selecting the best aperture for each source
Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 33011 stars
Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars
Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 56289 stars
Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 27096 stars
Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 28065 stars
Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 50206 stars
done! =)
TIMING select_aperture: 25 seconds
Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve
You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make'
Computing, please wait a bit
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 193714 objects, the longest string is 387 bytes.
Allocating memory for resorting the file.
----***** VaST processing WARNING *****----
You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one.
Please investigate this!
**************************************************************
This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by
inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic
messages printed above (or the vast*.log files):
* How many of the input images are matched?
* Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable?
* Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent?
You may run
./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit
to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings
(star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration
file, see various examples in the VaST directory).
If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky
Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log
file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please
upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/
**************************************************************
Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1)
_____________________
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Last image: 2461256.64218971 04.08.2026 03:24:35.191 UTC
ERROR running VaST on the field Cas-03-Q1b1x1 (less than 4 images processed)
exp_start= 21.01.2026 01:40:37.214 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461061.56999090 ap= 4.6 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 221349 *matched= 221349 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-40-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
exp_start= 12.02.2026 02:07:30.435 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461083.58866244 ap= 4.6 rotation= -0.139 *detected= 208272 *matched= 194667 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-07-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
exp_start= 04.08.2026 03:24:35.191 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461256.64218971 ap= 5.4 rotation= -177.600 *detected= 66226 *matched= 64906 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-24-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
exp_start= 04.08.2026 03:25:21.386 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461256.64272437 ap= 5.4 rotation= -177.586 *detected= 66429 *matched= 65067 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_222708_TTUQ1b1x1_923129_vZ6oUu1g/fd_Cas-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_22-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
########### Completed Cas-03-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
02:12:27.83 +64:09:51.9
###################################################################################
02:12:27.83 +64:09:51.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
02:12:27.83 +64:09:51.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
02:12:27.83 +64:09:51.9 -- a known variable star
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
02:12:27.83 +64:09:51.9
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461256.64218971 -observatory V36
07:34:45.95 +20:17:29.4 Mercury (-0.1mag)
11:48:13.74 +00:57:00.7 Venus (-4.3mag)
05:37:22.10 +23:28:06.9 Mars (1.3mag)
08:39:15.37 +18:54:50.4 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:39.42 +03:18:03.9 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:11:14.16 +20:55:40.2 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:19.35 +00:14:47.4 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:28:32.04 -23:28:34.9 Pluto (14.4mag)
00:58:03.03 +09:30:32.9 Moon (-11.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 3 22:58 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461256.64218971:
08:39:21.95 +18:54:23.8 Io (6.0mag)
08:39:16.06 +18:54:48.7 Europa (6.3mag)
08:39:03.40 +18:55:40.5 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:38:49.71 +18:56:39.2 Callisto (6.7mag)
08:36:53.87 +18:51:45.7 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:39:14.35 +18:54:55.6 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:36:23.12 +18:51:05.7 Elara (17.7mag)
08:43:19.98 +18:36:14.9 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:42:42.33 +19:04:14.6 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:46.67 +03:18:19.2 Titan (8.4mag)
00:56:44.27 +03:17:54.2 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:37.04 +03:16:05.9 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:56:33.13 +03:18:31.2 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:56:07.17 +03:11:47.3 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 3 22:58 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461256.64218971:
18:48:19.23 -25:01:38.6 JWST
18:17:11.59 +29:10:20.7 Chandra
08:52:49.72 -49:45:10.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 3 22:58 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461256.64218971 -observatory V36
03:08:56.60 +17:01:28.0 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:03:08.49 -34:38:52.7 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:49:57.31 -68:45:19.0 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:08:42.46 +32:54:30.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:31:13.33 +35:39:58.0 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:41:57.65 +31:40:33.2 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:39:22.01 +26:36:35.5 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:17:47.88 +28:39:14.2 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:26:07.35 +05:17:13.2 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:11:52.16 -12:07:48.8 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:16:14.25 +66:26:12.8 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:52:11.93 -12:33:09.1 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:03:27.08 +31:09:45.4 15.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:07:42.21 +15:37:10.8 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:08:22.30 +42:48:43.1 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:16:40.70 +48:55:32.1 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:11:48.52 -13:01:33.3 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:53:30.42 +24:52:14.3 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:28:59.56 -15:35:28.3 17.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:27:16.99 +21:09:29.6 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:55:44.93 +02:36:56.0 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:04:50.64 +78:11:55.8 16.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:05:46.71 +46:05:48.3 17.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:43:27.95 +08:05:57.5 17.2mag A/2026 E1
21:53:41.78 -25:33:04.2 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:26:32.74 -03:09:07.8 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:34:07.07 +32:04:00.5 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:59:21.13 +05:58:41.9 17.2mag 63P/Wild
00:54:17.64 -05:18:45.3 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
05:26:13.14 +20:44:58.6 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:41:40.66 -23:02:41.9 17.9mag 84P/Giclas
02:56:29.66 +13:22:13.3 16.6mag 88P/Howell
07:45:19.65 +28:11:48.6 16.1mag 93P/Lovas
03:54:58.78 +15:17:35.0 17.7mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
05:42:57.14 +30:41:54.9 16.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:08:46.77 +27:19:34.8 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:35:36.87 -08:41:31.4 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos
05:30:28.70 +21:11:12.1 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:21:27.91 +19:05:17.8 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:03:55.89 +03:25:47.2 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:21:58.53 -19:49:52.0 14.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:01:57.14 +37:32:46.6 15.8mag 162P/SidingSpring
16:23:13.74 +37:29:59.3 12.5mag 169P/NEAT
02:35:19.25 +09:25:09.8 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:39:38.89 -09:47:48.8 17.6mag 235P/LINEAR
20:25:14.85 -52:49:10.0 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
03:10:12.76 +23:25:12.0 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
06:53:00.58 +37:46:39.9 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:09:15.71 +03:35:07.6 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski
08:57:09.38 +18:34:28.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
08:29:39.68 +37:05:37.0 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 3 22:58 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 3 22:58 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug 3 22:58 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
00:30:19.249 +18:24:23.83 AT 2026uvg 2026-07-03.45 20.3378
02:34:07.458 +16:36:44.86 AT 2026uvf 2026-07-08.47 20.1237
05:51:16.620 -53:34:27.66 SN 2026uve 2026-07-14.17 17.677
14:40:13.463 -21:42:28.05 AT 2026uvd 2026-07-15.38 19.23
15:23:59.541 -29:29:57.56 AT 2026uvc 2026-07-15.38 20.26
14:05:43.115 -39:08:24.01 AT 2026uvb 2026-07-15.39 19.73
13:43:05.573 -20:04:24.22 AT 2026uva 2026-07-15.37 19.18
15:22:34.470 -05:37:40.51 AT 2026uuz 2026-07-15.39 19.82
16:09:54.586 +00:47:42.41 AT 2026uuy 2026-07-15.44 20.09
19:33:35.563 -39:15:48.22 AT 2026uux 2026-07-14.41 20.62
00:40:10.620 -43:16:14.80 AT 2026uuw 2026-06-26.42 21.69
01:06:29.115 +11:42:11.17 AT 2026uuv 2026-07-11.21 20.08
16:51:06.135 +20:55:05.41 AT 2026uuu 2026-07-10.91 20.4
13:34:34.622 +55:47:04.76 AT 2026uut 2026-07-14.76 19.13
13:51:15.996 +56:24:21.13 AT 2026uus 2026-07-14.76 19.68
15:20:47.992 +45:03:38.57 AT 2026uur 2026-07-14.77 19.22
17:15:43.403 +47:21:24.62 AT 2026uuq 2026-07-14.76 19.19
17:01:52.196 +41:26:22.21 AT 2026uup 2026-07-14.78 19.77
15:45:07.966 +53:24:05.89 AT 2026uuo 2026-07-14.82 19.85
17:58:55.437 +44:40:19.09 AT 2026uun 2026-07-14.88 18.67
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Aug 3 22:58 tns_transients_list.txt