fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 03.40903 | 2461255.90903 | 11.78 | 00:00:14.28 -14:54:18.1 | 4711 5060 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.40967 | 2461255.90967 | 11.81 | 00:00:14.29 -14:54:18.1 | 4716 5065 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 03.4093 2461255.9093 11.79 00:00:14.28 -14:54:18.1
76.09253 -72.93210 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
23 Thalia -1 -0 1 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:00:14.28 -14:54:18.1: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:00:14.28 -14:54:18.1: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 03.40903 | 2461255.90903 | 12.74 | 00:04:47.86 -14:54:22.8 | 5374 5096 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.40967 | 2461255.90967 | 12.77 | 00:04:47.91 -14:54:23.2 | 5379 5102 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 03.4093 2461255.9093 12.76 00:04:47.89 -14:54:23.0
78.98346 -73.65565 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
259 Aletheia -1 0 1 12.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:04:47.89 -14:54:23.0: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:04:47.89 -14:54:23.0: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Cet-09-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Cet-09-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing Cet-09-Q1b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 445087 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 445087 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
renamed 'Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2300.5383 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.8181 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 6145.9023 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1319.6090 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 6140.2287 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1322.4820 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.67151 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-03T04:48:50.1980483' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-03T09:48:50.1980483' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61255.4089143286 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-03T09:49:00.1021124' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61255.4090289585 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.998691184976 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -18.0000718975242 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 38.3233333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 176.336388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.61017447679107 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29529 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29529 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 51.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 358.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/d_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits :) Spent 0.508186 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/d_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-03T04:49:45.3386023' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-03T09:49:45.3386023' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61255.4095525229 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-03T09:49:55.2408076' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61255.4096671296 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.99869113356 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -18.0000719057569 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 38.3352777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 176.619722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.60975200336251 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29529 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29529 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 51.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 358.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/d_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits :) Spent 0.494437 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/d_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461255.90903007 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits' wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Image size: 940.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:01.382 -18:00:09.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.382 -18:00:09.19 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0057 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Image size: 940.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.416 -18:00:41.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.416 -18:00:41.88 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0101 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:01.382 -18:00:09.19 Second-epoch second image center 23:59:59.416 -18:00:41.88 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01196 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KAZrKMpKCX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dCJrSUNlTO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AxDL2rpJK6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K49MiUsY5E Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.382900 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.382900 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.31 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.07 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.07
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=6.2) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg Loaded 4123 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1992 out of 2014 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2014 out of 2454 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 2.2 pix Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 2.8 pix fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 2.8 pix fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.1 mag. Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 14.1 mag. Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 13.7 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 13.7 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.KAZrKMpKCX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=208, bad_region=0, passed=2460 Got 2460 stars (including 2249 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5854 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5854 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2173 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2170 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2170 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2170 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5853 through 0 to 8.4415, gap 8.4415 to 351.5853 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2173 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2170 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2170 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 2170 stars left (next iteration limit 2387) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=2170 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=568 n_q2=534 n_q3=534 n_q4=534 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.dCJrSUNlTO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=0, passed=2454 Got 2454 stars (including 2246 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5961 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5961 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2168 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2164 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2164 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2164 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2454 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5952 through 0 to 8.4410, gap 8.4410 to 351.5952 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2170 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2166 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2454 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2166 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2454 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 2166 stars left (next iteration limit 2380) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=2166 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=569 n_q2=535 n_q3=549 n_q4=513 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.AxDL2rpJK6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=196, bad_region=0, passed=2141 Got 2141 stars (including 1945 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2141 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2434 through 0 to 8.3408, gap 8.3408 to 351.2434 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1870 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2141 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2425 through 0 to 8.3414, gap 8.3414 to 351.2425 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2141 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2141 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 1870 stars left (next iteration limit 2057) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1870 robust_rms=11.188 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.578 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1870 robust_rms=0.418 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.449 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1870 robust_rms=0.293 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.336 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1870 robust_rms_before=1.029 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.285 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.293 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.320 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.336 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.320 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits N_match=1870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=506 n_q2=450 n_q3=502 n_q4=412 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.K49MiUsY5E (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=191, bad_region=0, passed=2131 Got 2131 stars (including 1935 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2131 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2434 through 0 to 8.3078, gap 8.3078 to 351.2434 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1862 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2129 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2426 through 0 to 8.3085, gap 8.3085 to 351.2426 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2129 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2129 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 1863 stars left (next iteration limit 2049) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1863 robust_rms=10.899 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.697 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1863 robust_rms=0.386 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.399 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1863 robust_rms=0.291 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.335 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1863 robust_rms_before=1.017 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.291 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.291 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.341 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.335 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.341 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits N_match=1863 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=512 n_q2=450 n_q3=497 n_q4=404 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.194 ref2=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.237 new1=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits sigma_overall=0.297 worst_q_ratio=1.150 new2=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.199 reference average sigma_overall=0.3715 worst_q_ratio=1.2155 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472_astrometric_residuals.png (2170 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473_astrometric_residuals.png (2166 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426_astrometric_residuals.png (1870 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427_astrometric_residuals.png (1863 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 23:43:49.63 -15:17:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Image size: 940.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:01.382 -18:00:09.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.382 -18:00:09.19 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0057 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Image size: 940.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.416 -18:00:41.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.416 -18:00:41.88 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0101 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:01.382 -18:00:09.19 Second-epoch second image center 23:59:59.416 -18:00:41.88 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01196 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ROKfkYChmw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QSczhUCG5P Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NJdRCUWU01 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x2FM0esgpe Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_ Discovery image 3 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 8.20 23:43:49.62 -15:17:06.0 2344 4676 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits .fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.255300 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.255300 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.21 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=4.9) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 15163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg Loaded 4148 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3365 out of 3470 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3470 out of 15163 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=4.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 2.1 pix Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.2 mag. Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 14.2 mag. Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 13.8 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 13.8 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.ROKfkYChmw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=477, bad_region=0, passed=14962 Got 14962 stars (including 14469 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14962 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4424, gap 8.4424 to 351.5847 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5844 through 0 to 8.4413, gap 8.4413 to 351.5844 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5342) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1103 n_q3=1307 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.QSczhUCG5P (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=621, bad_region=0, passed=15161 Got 15161 stars (including 14519 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15161 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5857 through 0 to 8.4400, gap 8.4400 to 351.5857 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4856 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5846 through 0 to 8.4408, gap 8.4408 to 351.5846 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4857 stars left (next iteration limit 5341) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=4857 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=1273 n_q2=1108 n_q3=1310 n_q4=1166 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.NJdRCUWU01 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=358, bad_region=1, passed=11681 Got 11681 stars (including 11307 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11681 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2434 through 0 to 8.3435, gap 8.3435 to 351.2434 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11681 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2423 through 0 to 8.3441, gap 8.3441 to 351.2423 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11681 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11681 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5340) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=1170 n_q2=1180 n_q3=1353 n_q4=1151 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.x2FM0esgpe (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=350, bad_region=2, passed=11692 Got 11692 stars (including 11323 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11692 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2434 through 0 to 8.3396, gap 8.3396 to 351.2434 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11692 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2425 through 0 to 8.3403, gap 8.3403 to 351.2425 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11692 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11692 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5340) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1177 n_q2=1169 n_q3=1350 n_q4=1158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:10.17 -22:29:36.9: 13.67 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:00:14.28 -14:54:18.1: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:58.68 -13:18:33.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:04:47.89 -14:54:23.0: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:12:35.46 -17:15:08.8: 13.13 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:30.67 -20:08:35.7: 12.97 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:25:34.28 -18:52:21.1: 11.45 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:53.72 -22:44:40.1: 13.08 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:13.85 -22:39:20.8: 13.21 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:48.50 -22:47:01.8: 13.29 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:53.72 -22:44:40.1: 12.98 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:30.67 -20:08:35.7: 13.02 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:12:35.46 -17:15:08.8: 13.01 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:04:47.89 -14:54:23.0: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:25:34.28 -18:52:21.1: 11.47 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:58.68 -13:18:33.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:58.68 -13:18:33.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:10.17 -22:29:36.9: 13.39 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:00:14.28 -14:54:18.1: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.46 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:53.72 -22:44:40.1: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.8075 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:30.67 -20:08:35.7: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.8556 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:35.46 -17:15:08.8: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3136 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:34.28 -18:52:21.1: ref_mag=11.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6229 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:10.17 -22:29:36.9: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.8237 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:13.85 -22:39:20.8: 13.22 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:48.50 -22:47:01.8: 13.48 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:13.85 -22:39:20.8: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.8298 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:48.50 -22:47:01.8: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.9694 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:29.77 -22:33:33.3: 13.39 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:36.07 -22:26:04.0: 13.44 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:49.17 -22:36:20.5: 13.49 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:28.54 -22:46:38.8: 13.51 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:57.83 -21:46:29.2: 13.56 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:55.14 -21:26:34.7: 13.43 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:32:01.95 -22:04:48.6: 13.59 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:26:52.43 -22:02:58.3: 13.64 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:29.77 -22:33:33.3: 13.41 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:29.77 -22:33:33.3: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.0265 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:36.07 -22:26:04.0: 13.27 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:57.83 -21:46:29.2: 13.32 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:49.17 -22:36:20.5: 13.34 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:28.54 -22:46:38.8: 13.57 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:55.14 -21:26:34.7: 13.40 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:36.07 -22:26:04.0: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.9358 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:57.83 -21:46:29.2: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.0948 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:49.17 -22:36:20.5: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.0634 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:28.54 -22:46:38.8: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1452 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:55.14 -21:26:34.7: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.0129 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:26:52.43 -22:02:58.3: 13.43 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:32:01.95 -22:04:48.6: 13.35 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:52.43 -22:02:58.3: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.1896 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:01.95 -22:04:48.6: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.0438 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:37.32 -22:39:15.4: 13.48 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:16.90 -22:10:34.1: 13.61 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:46.06 -21:01:38.2: 13.56 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:27:22.89 -21:44:56.9: 13.54 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:53.89 -22:17:24.5: 13.80 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:17.12 -20:58:50.6: 13.61 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:26:07.11 -21:38:21.5: 13.35 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:06.43 -21:03:03.0: 13.45 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:37.32 -22:39:15.4: 13.77 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:37.32 -22:39:15.4: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.0549 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:46.06 -21:01:38.2: 13.63 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:46.06 -21:01:38.2: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2187 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:53.89 -22:17:24.5: 13.60 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:27:22.89 -21:44:56.9: 13.30 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:16.90 -22:10:34.1: 13.49 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:06.43 -21:03:03.0: 13.38 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:17.12 -20:58:50.6: 13.38 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:26:07.11 -21:38:21.5: 13.51 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:06.43 -21:03:03.0: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3197 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:53.89 -22:17:24.5: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.1552 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:22.89 -21:44:56.9: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.1333 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:16.90 -22:10:34.1: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2031 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:17.12 -20:58:50.6: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2420 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:07.11 -21:38:21.5: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.1421 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:17.28 -20:37:59.5: 13.61 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:32:20.88 -19:00:51.3: 13.64 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:26:42.52 -21:49:10.6: 13.46 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:23:45.49 -22:23:55.2: 13.40 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:44.46 -21:52:09.1: 13.60 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:54.66 -22:03:29.1: 13.52 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:24:43.18 -22:27:50.0: 13.71 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:59.50 -19:37:59.7: 14.08 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:17.28 -20:37:59.5: 13.50 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:17.28 -20:37:59.5: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2187 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:32:20.88 -19:00:51.3: 13.64 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:44.46 -21:52:09.1: 13.32 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:24:43.18 -22:27:50.0: 13.39 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:54.66 -22:03:29.1: 13.75 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:59.50 -19:37:59.7: 13.65 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:26:42.52 -21:49:10.6: 13.29 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:20.88 -19:00:51.3: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4222 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:44.46 -21:52:09.1: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.1629 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:43.18 -22:27:50.0: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3637 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:59.50 -19:37:59.7: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2980 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:54.66 -22:03:29.1: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2057 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:42.52 -21:49:10.6: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.1483 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:23:45.49 -22:23:55.2: 13.86 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:45.49 -22:23:55.2: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.1488 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:07.88 -21:15:55.1: 13.76 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:10:51.75 -22:43:32.3: 13.60 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:00.44 -21:18:49.2: 13.41 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:26.99 -17:41:31.4: 13.67 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:54.59 -14:46:51.6: 13.66 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:17.65 -17:32:35.3: 13.70 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:02.01 -15:05:27.2: 13.78 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:47.27 -16:46:28.5: 13.93 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:07.88 -21:15:55.1: 13.96 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:07.88 -21:15:55.1: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3412 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:10:51.75 -22:43:32.3: 13.61 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:10:51.75 -22:43:32.3: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3749 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:54.59 -14:46:51.6: 13.99 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:17.65 -17:32:35.3: 13.68 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:26.99 -17:41:31.4: 13.66 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:54.59 -14:46:51.6: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5735 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:17.65 -17:32:35.3: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5677 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:00.44 -21:18:49.2: 13.49 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:26.99 -17:41:31.4: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4266 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:00.44 -21:18:49.2: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4999 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:02.01 -15:05:27.2: 13.86 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:02.01 -15:05:27.2: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6075 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:47.27 -16:46:28.5: 13.80 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:47.27 -16:46:28.5: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5130 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:07.64 -17:17:02.6: 13.51 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:52.31 -14:33:43.9: 13.98 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:26:26.77 -16:01:02.5: 13.97 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:25.67 -19:14:24.7: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:34.31 -19:33:47.7: 13.57 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:26:21.47 -19:14:26.3: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:25:57.19 -20:42:41.8: 13.77 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:26:43.21 -16:49:58.0: 13.50 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:07.64 -17:17:02.6: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:52.31 -14:33:43.9: 13.77 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:07.64 -17:17:02.6: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5390 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:52.31 -14:33:43.9: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5129 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:26:26.77 -16:01:02.5: 13.84 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:26.77 -16:01:02.5: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6281 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:25.67 -19:14:24.7: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:34.31 -19:33:47.7: 13.51 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:26:21.47 -19:14:26.3: 13.72 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:25.67 -19:14:24.7: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5312 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:34.31 -19:33:47.7: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5518 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:21.47 -19:14:26.3: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4756 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:25:57.19 -20:42:41.8: 13.95 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:57.19 -20:42:41.8: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4806 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:26:43.21 -16:49:58.0: 13.53 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:43.21 -16:49:58.0: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5659 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:04.40 -23:10:43.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:35.81 -17:13:47.1: 13.48 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:19:56.55 -21:18:31.7: 14.02 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:50.25 -22:53:49.0: 12.30 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:04.40 -23:10:43.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:04.40 -23:10:43.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:35.81 -17:13:47.1: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:35.81 -17:13:47.1: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6432 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:19:56.55 -21:18:31.7: 13.89 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:56.55 -21:18:31.7: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5629 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:50.25 -22:53:49.0: 12.43 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:50.25 -22:53:49.0: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.0041 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21402.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21533.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21271_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21271_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.26 00:12:35.45 -17:15:08.6 6568 3737 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21273_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21273_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.38 00:12:35.47 -17:15:08.9 6573 3743 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 12.93 00:29:53.68 -22:44:39.9 9148 0471 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21274_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21274_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 12.72 00:29:53.76 -22:44:40.2 9152 0477 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 12.84 00:28:30.65 -20:08:35.0 8916 2057 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21278_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21278_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 12.86 00:28:30.69 -20:08:36.5 8920 2062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 11.55 00:25:34.36 -18:52:20.9 8474 2820 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21292_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21292_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 11.72 00:25:34.20 -18:52:21.4 8478 2825 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 9.14 00:31:58.68 -13:18:33.9 9358 6231 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21402_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 Preparing report for the candidate 21402_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21488_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21488_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 9.14 00:31:58.68 -13:18:33.5 9362 6237 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits **** FOUND 23:39:41.69 -14:14:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21528_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21528_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 12.36 23:39:41.60 -14:14:13.1 1684 5263 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits **** FOUND 23:34:55.56 -15:14:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21533_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 Preparing report for the candidate 21533_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21545_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21545_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 12.70 23:34:55.70 -15:14:48.6 1038 4594 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 12.77 00:30:10.11 -22:29:36.0 9184 0626 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21553_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21553_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 12.89 00:30:10.23 -22:29:37.9 9188 0631 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 12.84 00:28:13.78 -22:39:21.4 8910 0524 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21580_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21580_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 12.82 00:28:13.93 -22:39:20.2 8914 0530 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 12.98 00:31:48.51 -22:47:03.7 9421 0448 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21582_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21582_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 12.96 00:31:48.49 -22:46:59.8 9426 0454 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.01 00:31:29.85 -22:33:32.6 9374 0586 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21584_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21584_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.05 00:31:29.69 -22:33:34.0 9378 0591 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 12.96 00:30:36.13 -22:26:03.1 9245 0662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21595_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21595_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 12.92 00:30:36.00 -22:26:05.0 9249 0667 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.08 00:29:57.86 -21:46:28.6 9146 1065 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21596_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21596_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.11 00:29:57.80 -21:46:29.8 9150 1070 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.08 00:31:28.43 -22:46:38.7 9374 0452 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21598_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21598_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.25 00:31:28.65 -22:46:38.9 9378 0458 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.06 00:31:55.01 -21:26:35.4 9422 1269 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21599_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21599_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 12.97 00:31:55.27 -21:26:34.0 9427 1275 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.07 00:31:49.12 -22:36:20.9 9421 0558 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21608_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21608_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.06 00:31:49.22 -22:36:20.2 9425 0563 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.05 00:32:01.89 -22:04:47.6 9445 0880 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21610_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21610_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.04 00:32:02.02 -22:04:49.7 9450 0885 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.09 00:26:52.46 -22:02:57.2 8708 0893 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21611_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21611_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.34 00:26:52.41 -22:02:59.4 8712 0898 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.09 00:28:37.36 -22:39:15.6 8966 0525 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21612_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21612_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.03 00:28:37.27 -22:39:15.1 8970 0531 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.12 00:29:53.91 -22:17:24.4 9143 0750 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21614_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21614_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.20 00:29:53.86 -22:17:24.7 9147 0755 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.13 00:28:46.07 -21:01:37.8 8964 1519 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21630_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21630_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.35 00:28:46.06 -21:01:38.6 8969 1525 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.20 00:28:16.95 -22:10:34.1 8910 0818 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21640_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21640_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.21 00:28:16.85 -22:10:34.1 8915 0823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.25 00:30:17.22 -20:58:48.5 9182 1550 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21649_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21649_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.23 00:30:17.03 -20:58:52.7 9186 1555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.22 00:27:22.89 -21:44:57.2 8776 1077 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21650_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21650_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.07 00:27:22.89 -21:44:56.5 8780 1082 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.30 00:29:06.36 -21:03:03.0 9013 1505 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21651_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21651_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.35 00:29:06.51 -21:03:02.9 9018 1511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.21 00:26:07.13 -21:38:20.5 8594 1142 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21658_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21658_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.09 00:26:07.09 -21:38:22.5 8598 1147 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.26 00:30:17.24 -20:37:59.3 9178 1762 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21661_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21661_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.18 00:30:17.33 -20:37:59.8 9183 1767 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.31 00:32:20.93 -19:00:50.5 9460 2751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21662_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21662_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.62 00:32:20.83 -19:00:52.1 9465 2756 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.26 00:24:43.09 -22:27:52.3 8408 0635 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21675_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21675_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.56 00:24:43.26 -22:27:47.7 8413 0641 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.29 00:31:44.35 -21:52:08.4 9401 1009 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21676_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21676_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.07 00:31:44.57 -21:52:09.8 9406 1014 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.29 00:26:42.54 -21:49:10.0 8681 1033 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21679_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21679_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.05 00:26:42.51 -21:49:11.2 8685 1038 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.33 00:31:59.49 -19:38:00.6 9414 2373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21683_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21683_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.27 00:31:59.51 -19:37:58.7 9419 2379 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.31 00:30:54.62 -22:03:29.2 9284 0893 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21686_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21686_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.14 00:30:54.69 -22:03:29.0 9289 0898 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.32 00:23:45.57 -22:23:53.9 8271 0673 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21691_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21691_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.04 00:23:45.41 -22:23:56.6 8275 0678 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.36 00:31:07.96 -21:15:55.0 9307 1377 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21692_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21692_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.32 00:31:07.80 -21:15:55.2 9311 1383 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.36 00:10:51.77 -22:43:31.6 6466 0423 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21693_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21693_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.40 00:10:51.73 -22:43:32.9 6471 0429 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.48 00:28:00.37 -21:18:49.5 8859 1343 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21696_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21696_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.54 00:28:00.50 -21:18:48.9 8864 1349 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.43 00:30:26.98 -17:41:30.3 9169 3551 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21701_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21701_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.43 00:30:27.00 -17:41:32.5 9174 3556 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits **** FOUND 00:31:32.61 -21:37:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21702_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21702_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.32 00:31:32.66 -21:37:56.3 9375 1159 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits **** FOUND 00:28:42.14 -22:26:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21703_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21703_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.14 00:28:42.20 -22:26:37.0 8978 0660 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.45 00:31:17.70 -17:32:34.5 9292 3644 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21706_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21706_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.79 00:31:17.60 -17:32:36.1 9296 3649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.50 00:31:54.70 -14:46:51.6 9359 5329 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21709_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21709_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.69 00:31:54.47 -14:46:51.6 9363 5334 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.53 00:30:02.02 -15:05:27.9 9082 5132 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21712_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21712_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.78 00:30:02.01 -15:05:26.6 9086 5138 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.52 00:31:47.18 -16:46:28.4 9357 4112 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21714_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21714_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.51 00:31:47.35 -16:46:28.5 9362 4118 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.49 00:31:07.68 -17:17:03.2 9265 3800 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21720_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21720_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.60 00:31:07.61 -17:17:02.0 9269 3806 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.53 00:31:52.30 -14:33:44.0 9351 5463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21722_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21722_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.50 00:31:52.33 -14:33:43.8 9356 5468 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.55 00:26:26.77 -16:01:02.2 8562 4554 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21723_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21723_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.81 00:26:26.77 -16:01:02.8 8566 4560 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.51 00:30:25.67 -19:14:23.9 9183 2610 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21725_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21725_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.57 00:30:25.67 -19:14:25.5 9187 2615 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.55 00:29:34.35 -19:33:47.9 9062 2411 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21733_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21733_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.56 00:29:34.27 -19:33:47.5 9066 2417 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.53 00:26:21.46 -19:14:25.6 8593 2599 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21735_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21735_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.43 00:26:21.47 -19:14:27.1 8597 2605 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.48 00:25:57.11 -20:42:41.4 8556 1705 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21754_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21754_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.48 00:25:57.27 -20:42:42.2 8561 1711 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.65 00:26:43.16 -16:49:58.6 8612 4060 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21757_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21757_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.51 00:26:43.25 -16:49:57.4 8617 4066 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.65 00:31:35.87 -17:13:47.7 9334 3835 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21760_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21760_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.63 00:31:35.74 -17:13:46.6 9338 3841 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.52 00:15:04.45 -23:10:44.2 7066 0168 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21777_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 21777_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.40 00:15:04.34 -23:10:43.3 7070 0174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 13.70 00:19:56.48 -21:18:31.8 7710 1325 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00166_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 00166_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 13.47 00:19:56.62 -21:18:31.5 7715 1330 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.40903 2461255.90903 11.98 00:28:50.24 -22:53:49.7 8999 0377 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 The candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 12.03 00:28:50.26 -22:53:48.4 9004 0383 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits **** FOUND 23:43:49.63 -15:17:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 00:00:14.28 -14:54:18.1 00:04:47.89 -14:54:23.0 ########### Completed Cet-09-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 00:00:14.28 -14:54:18.1 00:04:47.89 -14:54:23.0 ################################################################################### 00:00:14.28 -14:54:18.1 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:04:47.89 -14:54:23.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461255.90903007 -observatory V36 07:31:20.90 +20:13:43.1 Mercury (0.0mag) 11:45:35.09 +01:18:33.3 Venus (-4.3mag) 05:35:13.68 +23:26:19.5 Mars (1.3mag) 08:38:35.64 +18:57:14.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:41.30 +03:18:28.8 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:11:08.54 +20:55:25.6 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:21.57 +00:15:04.0 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:28:36.28 -23:28:17.4 Pluto (14.4mag) 00:20:37.94 +05:12:52.0 Moon (-11.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 3 04:51 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461255.90903007: 08:38:30.83 +18:57:35.9 Io (6.0mag) 08:38:27.29 +18:57:51.3 Europa (6.3mag) 08:38:31.39 +18:57:30.7 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:38:09.40 +18:59:04.8 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:36:15.14 +18:53:44.2 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:38:36.11 +18:57:14.1 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:35:43.92 +18:53:12.9 Elara (17.7mag) 08:42:39.74 +18:39:00.8 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:42:05.46 +19:06:30.1 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:51.00 +03:18:36.5 Titan (8.4mag) 00:56:43.22 +03:18:11.3 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:36.79 +03:16:24.4 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:56:38.39 +03:18:57.1 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:56:09.99 +03:12:18.1 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 3 04:52 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461255.90903007: 18:44:31.41 -25:18:15.8 JWST 16:48:50.00 +43:21:13.1 Chandra 06:12:43.57 +25:58:39.2 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 3 04:51 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461255.90903007 -observatory V36 03:08:04.16 +16:57:32.3 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:03:24.97 -34:38:58.2 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:49:15.80 -68:43:50.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:08:30.11 +32:53:37.3 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:28:53.65 +35:16:12.8 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:42:32.78 +31:42:45.6 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:38:37.08 +26:37:18.8 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:17:07.48 +28:41:13.9 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:25:37.93 +05:17:00.7 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:11:46.70 -12:06:11.6 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:17:13.94 +66:30:19.0 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:53:02.31 -12:28:57.9 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:02:36.45 +31:07:47.7 15.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:07:51.49 +15:37:12.0 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:09:19.64 +42:45:14.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:17:43.48 +48:52:04.4 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:11:12.00 -13:02:18.5 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:53:00.37 +24:59:53.0 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:28:38.99 -15:29:45.3 17.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:26:17.56 +21:12:07.7 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:55:20.32 +02:39:42.6 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:05:20.88 +78:15:30.5 16.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:05:25.32 +46:04:45.9 17.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:42:52.87 +08:00:54.8 17.2mag A/2026 E1 21:52:47.50 -25:13:46.0 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:26:07.20 -03:06:32.0 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:33:10.92 +31:59:52.6 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:57:51.31 +06:13:05.7 17.2mag 63P/Wild 00:54:16.32 -05:17:28.0 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 05:24:31.86 +20:45:16.4 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:42:19.63 -22:57:26.3 17.9mag 84P/Giclas 02:55:41.06 +13:18:32.1 16.6mag 88P/Howell 07:43:24.13 +28:17:21.2 16.1mag 93P/Lovas 03:52:58.36 +15:00:41.5 17.7mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 05:40:31.16 +30:45:29.6 16.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:07:01.88 +27:26:38.7 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:34:10.38 -08:24:25.1 17.0mag 124P/Mrkos 05:29:22.59 +21:11:09.4 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:20:11.23 +19:07:10.3 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:03:59.74 +03:25:49.8 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:22:04.90 -19:51:44.8 14.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:59:22.90 +37:29:26.4 15.7mag 162P/SidingSpring 16:33:42.22 +36:42:36.4 12.5mag 169P/NEAT 02:33:53.59 +09:23:47.2 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:39:20.05 -09:44:43.2 17.6mag 235P/LINEAR 20:25:46.30 -52:47:59.4 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 03:08:04.75 +23:06:05.2 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 06:50:46.95 +37:46:56.9 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:09:04.01 +03:39:53.0 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 08:56:29.28 +18:36:35.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:28:34.85 +37:09:28.2 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 3 04:51 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 3 04:51 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug 3 04:51 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 23:30:53.858 -16:27:31.35 AT 2026usq 2026-07-14.34 23.3617 21:03:15.206 -17:52:50.87 AT 2026usp 2026-07-14.22 22.5836 23:25:29.342 -15:49:05.70 AT 2026uso 2026-07-14.34 23.0786 20:29:57.060 -13:48:47.93 AT 2026usn 2026-07-14.22 23.2468 23:23:10.557 -15:16:46.77 AT 2026usm 2026-07-14.34 22.7671 20:54:49.599 -18:10:18.85 AT 2026usl 2026-07-14.22 21.2665 21:35:48.861 -17:55:14.33 AT 2026usk 2026-07-14.34 23.0537 00:33:00.856 -45:11:21.13 AT 2026usj 2026-07-14.40 22.7703 23:29:33.885 -17:56:19.41 AT 2026usi 2026-07-14.34 23.2857 13:58:40.133 -03:49:23.19 AT 2026ush 2026-07-14.05 22.7207 23:15:11.036 -13:20:52.94 AT 2026usg 2026-07-14.34 23.3938 14:03:58.602 -07:41:06.97 AT 2026usf 2026-07-14.05 23.0654 23:13:28.249 -15:56:16.37 AT 2026use 2026-07-14.33 22.9657 02:20:37.116 -05:54:28.83 AT 2026usd 2026-07-14.42 22.2827 23:25:52.067 -15:17:36.31 AT 2026usc 2026-07-14.34 22.9854 02:24:26.739 -06:37:43.52 AT 2026usb 2026-07-14.42 22.1878 23:27:04.905 -17:35:26.57 AT 2026usa 2026-07-14.34 23.0553 20:44:37.383 -16:04:49.28 AT 2026urz 2026-07-14.22 23.6703 20:15:13.940 -09:19:44.54 AT 2026ury 2026-07-14.25 23.1807 19:55:35.760 -16:59:02.78 AT 2026urx 2026-07-13.28 21.9307 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Aug 3 04:51 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 3 2026 08 03.40967 2461255.90967 8.36 23:43:49.62 -15:17:06.1 2344 4676 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_045031_TTUQ1b1x1_3602698_Al4QiByl/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_04-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0427.fits
