Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461255.8369,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260803.3369 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Tau-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Tau-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Tau-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 503551 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 503551 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits_preview.png'
Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits

renamed 'Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits_preview.png'
Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 500.8057
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 607.2146
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4298.3016
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 945.8601
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4270.9132
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 939.4809
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 8.58277
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.007
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 23.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-03T03:04:17.8762520' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-03T08:04:17.8762520' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61255.3363180091 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-03T08:04:27.7798728' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61255.3364326274 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 59.9976308647127 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 29.9999888181467 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 16.6969444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 64.6080555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.44238448586557 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29506 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29506 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 47.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 23.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 348.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/d_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits :)
Spent 0.500632 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/d_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 23.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-03T03:05:36.1641317' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-03T08:05:36.1641317' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61255.3372241203 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-03T08:05:46.0653788' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61255.3373387153 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 59.9976307638058 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 29.9999888061883 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 16.9419444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 64.7538888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.39518834815779 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29506 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29506 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 48.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 23.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 6.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/d_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits :)
Spent 0.524768 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/d_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits

fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461255.83643375
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Image size: 944.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:17.690 +30:00:26.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 04:00:17.690 +30:00:26.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0656 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Image size: 944.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:20.977 +29:59:46.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 04:00:20.977 +29:59:46.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0769 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:00:17.690 +30:00:26.23
Second-epoch second image center 04:00:20.977 +29:59:46.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01611 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Wsfl2JCECR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lDTDmeZX8x
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X9KmDh8X8z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gJ7NTojqYs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.967300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.967300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3107 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3107 deg
Loaded 7269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5557 out of 6071 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6071 out of 13513 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Wsfl2JCECR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13390
Got 13390 stars (including 12252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1524 n_q2=1103 n_q3=892 n_q4=1376 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lDTDmeZX8x (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13513
Got 13513 stars (including 12361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1523 n_q2=1108 n_q3=895 n_q4=1373 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.X9KmDh8X8z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=210, bad_region=0, passed=3229
Got 3229 stars (including 3016 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3229 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013114 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010491 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3222 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 2935 stars left (next iteration limit 3227)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2935 robust_rms=8.116 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.934 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2935 robust_rms=0.450 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.584 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2935 robust_rms=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.538 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2935 robust_rms_before=1.162 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.389 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.501 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.538
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.501 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits N_match=2935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=902 n_q2=440 n_q3=780 n_q4=813 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.282
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gJ7NTojqYs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=209, bad_region=0, passed=3274
Got 3274 stars (including 3064 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3274 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013113 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010490 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2991 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2978 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2992 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 2979 stars left (next iteration limit 3276)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2979 robust_rms=8.167 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.930 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2979 robust_rms=0.436 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.534 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2979 robust_rms=0.370 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.445 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2979 robust_rms_before=1.162 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.380 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.370 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.501 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.445
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:21.055 +29:59:45.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3274 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky387396.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.162 -> 0.370 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits N_match=2979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.441 n_q1=901 n_q2=445 n_q3=792 n_q4=841 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.233
ref2=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.288
new1=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits sigma_overall=0.388 worst_q_ratio=1.282
new2=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits sigma_overall=0.391 worst_q_ratio=1.245
reference average sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.2605
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326_astrometric_residuals.png (2935 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327_astrometric_residuals.png (2979 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:43:52.31 +25:16:25.5: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:37:38.55 +32:37:26.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:43:52.31 +25:16:25.5: 10.95 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:37:38.55 +32:37:26.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:38.55 +32:37:26.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.96 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:52.31 +25:16:25.5: ref_mag=10.96 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1609 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20878_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 20878_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 03.33643 | 2461255.83643 | 11.18 | 03:43:52.31 +25:16:25.8 | 2705 0247 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 11.14 | 03:43:52.32 +25:16:25.3 | 2698 0253 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20909_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 20909_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 03.33643 | 2461255.83643 | 9.99 | 04:37:38.56 +32:37:26.2 | 9446 5259 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 9.97 | 04:37:38.54 +32:37:27.3 | 9439 5265 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 01673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 11.05 | 04:10:37.98 +34:15:54.9 | 5924 5856 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 04:10:37.98 +34:15:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09740_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 09740_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 10.97 | 03:50:28.18 +27:40:06.1 | 3552 1733 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 03:50:28.17 +27:40:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Image size: 944.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:17.690 +30:00:26.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 04:00:17.690 +30:00:26.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0656 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Image size: 944.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:20.977 +29:59:46.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 04:00:20.977 +29:59:46.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0769 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:00:17.690 +30:00:26.23
Second-epoch second image center 04:00:20.977 +29:59:46.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01611 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PmRwGMRdqR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I2iI0lqOHd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits &> /tmp/tmp.el6IT0n10V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RiiaYqkisu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3061 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3061 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4826 out of 6103 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6103 out of 99190 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.833900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.833900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3061 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3061 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4826 out of 6103 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6103 out of 99190 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 98825 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5581 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3528 to +35.3112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5581 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3528 to 35.3112 deg
Loaded 7286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4805 out of 6109 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6109 out of 98825 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 38 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
1.9 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PmRwGMRdqR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=7855, bad_region=9, passed=99158
Got 99158 stars (including 91129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99158 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=1459 n_q2=1120 n_q3=933 n_q4=1390 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.I2iI0lqOHd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=7957, bad_region=10, passed=98800
Got 98800 stars (including 90683 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=1460 n_q2=1117 n_q3=937 n_q4=1390 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.el6IT0n10V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=866, bad_region=2, passed=23130
Got 23130 stars (including 22225 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23130 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013114 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010491 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits N_match=4887 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=1461 n_q2=694 n_q3=1353 n_q4=1379 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RiiaYqkisu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=689, bad_region=3, passed=23232
Got 23232 stars (including 22512 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23232 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013113 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010490 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=1458 n_q2=692 n_q3=1348 n_q4=1392 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:38:21.92 +34:00:29.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:39:50.68 +29:05:01.9: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:37:38.55 +32:37:26.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:45:00.70 +30:39:55.0: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:43:52.33 +25:16:25.8: 11.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:37:35.90 +28:26:37.0: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:26:44.44 +35:03:24.7: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:44:32.50 +32:08:42.8: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:37:38.55 +32:37:26.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:38.55 +32:37:26.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:39:50.68 +29:05:01.9: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:43:52.33 +25:16:25.8: 11.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:37:35.90 +28:26:37.0: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:45:00.70 +30:39:55.0: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:38:21.92 +34:00:29.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:21.92 +34:00:29.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:50.68 +29:05:01.9: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5161 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:52.33 +25:16:25.8: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2947 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:00.70 +30:39:55.0: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0006 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:35.90 +28:26:37.0: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3653 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:44:32.50 +32:08:42.8: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:26:44.44 +35:03:24.7: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:32.50 +32:08:42.8: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5489 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:44.44 +35:03:24.7: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6344 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:39:54.65 +25:11:45.3: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:13:51.64 +34:01:35.8: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:08:35.79 +33:42:39.3: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:19:29.45 +30:51:26.0: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:00:12.57 +29:34:21.9: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:44:23.96 +32:11:00.0: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:39:54.65 +25:11:45.3: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:54.65 +25:11:45.3: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5778 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:08:35.79 +33:42:39.3: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:13:51.64 +34:01:35.8: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:35.79 +33:42:39.3: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7052 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:19:29.45 +30:51:26.0: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:00:12.57 +29:34:21.9: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:29.45 +30:51:26.0: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6720 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:44:23.96 +32:11:00.0: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:12.57 +29:34:21.9: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1878 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:23.96 +32:11:00.0: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0961 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117826.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117538_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117538_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 03.33643 | 2461255.83643 | 13.00 | 03:45:00.69 +30:39:54.3 | 2791 3510 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 13.00 | 03:45:00.70 +30:39:55.7 | 2783 3517 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117548_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117548_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 03.33643 | 2461255.83643 | 12.48 | 03:39:50.64 +29:05:01.4 | 2129 2544 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.56 | 03:39:50.72 +29:05:02.3 | 2122 2550 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117550_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117550_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.37 | 03:57:34.48 +34:52:08.9 | 4282 6113 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 03:57:34.54 +34:52:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117551_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117551_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 03.33643 | 2461255.83643 | 11.29 | 03:43:52.33 +25:16:25.7 | 2706 0247 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 11.30 | 03:43:52.32 +25:16:25.8 | 2698 0253 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117585_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117585_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 03.33643 | 2461255.83643 | 10.12 | 04:37:38.54 +32:37:26.5 | 9446 5259 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 10.09 | 04:37:38.55 +32:37:27.0 | 9439 5265 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117641_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117641_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 03.33643 | 2461255.83643 | 11.36 | 04:38:21.95 +34:00:30.0 | 9424 6112 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 11.35 | 04:38:21.89 +34:00:29.7 | 9417 6117 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117645_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117645_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 11.63 | 03:53:04.41 +25:32:40.8 | 3949 0464 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 03:53:04.39 +25:32:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117653_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117653_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 11.53 | 04:26:11.13 +31:27:23.2 | 8051 4364 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 04:26:11.12 +31:27:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117655_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117655_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 11.83 | 04:10:49.11 +33:34:36.1 | 5980 5442 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 04:10:49.10 +33:34:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117707_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117707_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 03.33643 | 2461255.83643 | 12.37 | 03:37:35.89 +28:26:37.0 | 1834 2153 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.36 | 03:37:35.91 +28:26:36.9 | 1826 2159 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117709_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117709_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.46 | 03:54:18.22 +31:52:03.0 | 3955 4280 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 03:54:18.23 +31:52:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117715_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117715_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.05 | 04:20:25.05 +27:22:48.5 | 7552 1832 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 04:20:25.00 +27:22:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117723_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117723_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 03.33643 | 2461255.83643 | 12.52 | 03:44:32.58 +32:08:42.0 | 2711 4402 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.58 | 03:44:32.41 +32:08:43.6 | 2703 4408 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117727_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117727_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 03.33643 | 2461255.83643 | 12.78 | 03:26:44.42 +35:03:24.4 | 0442 6183 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.55 | 03:26:44.47 +35:03:25.0 | 0434 6190 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117743_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117743_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.26 | 04:20:05.32 +31:58:20.1 | 7237 4587 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 04:20:05.28 +31:58:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117748_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117748_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.59 | 03:56:26.79 +35:06:48.0 | 4135 6255 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 03:56:26.80 +35:06:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117762_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117762_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 03.33643 | 2461255.83643 | 12.53 | 03:39:54.72 +25:11:44.2 | 2162 0186 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.64 | 03:39:54.59 +25:11:46.4 | 2154 0193 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117784_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117784_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.96 | 03:24:26.80 +33:33:17.6 | 0125 5279 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 03:24:26.74 +33:33:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117809_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117809_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 03.33643 | 2461255.83643 | 12.67 | 04:08:35.72 +33:42:38.8 | 5703 5494 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.76 | 04:08:35.85 +33:42:39.9 | 5696 5501 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117826_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
Preparing report for the candidate 117826_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117903_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117903_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 03.33643 | 2461255.83643 | 12.62 | 04:19:29.44 +30:51:26.0 | 7232 3903 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.74 | 04:19:29.46 +30:51:25.9 | 7225 3909 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117954_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 117954_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 03.33643 | 2461255.83643 | 13.09 | 03:44:23.96 +32:11:00.0 | 2692 4424 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 13.10 | 03:44:23.96 +32:11:00.1 | 2684 4431 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118021_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 118021_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.71 | 04:24:36.00 +34:06:51.2 | 7675 5943 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 04:24:35.99 +34:06:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118050_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 118050_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.98 | 04:08:24.94 +32:27:44.6 | 5728 4746 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 04:08:24.98 +32:27:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118053_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 118053_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 03.33643 | 2461255.83643 | 13.19 | 04:00:12.58 +29:34:22.4 | 4792 2934 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-04-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 13.19 | 04:00:12.57 +29:34:21.4 | 4785 2940 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06813_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 06813_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.27 | 04:36:03.82 +34:10:40.8 | 9112 6176 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 04:36:03.84 +34:10:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110522_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 110522_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.11 | 03:51:16.41 +33:02:04.3 | 3543 4969 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 03:51:16.51 +33:02:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52535_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 52535_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.56 | 03:44:56.00 +30:22:24.3 | 2777 3341 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 03:44:56.02 +30:22:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96483_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 96483_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.34 | 04:14:17.03 +28:10:57.3 | 6691 2239 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 04:14:17.05 +28:10:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78181_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 78181_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.03 | 04:04:04.89 +25:42:48.5 | 5437 0648 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 04:04:04.91 +25:42:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 11.81 | 04:37:15.30 +33:48:48.2 | 9292 5977 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 04:37:15.31 +33:48:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96865_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 96865_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 11.73 | 04:25:17.15 +28:04:41.3 | 8158 2320 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 04:25:17.19 +28:04:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73958_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 73958_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.02 | 04:27:04.69 +26:06:14.9 | 8533 1156 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 04:27:04.68 +26:06:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 11.04 | 04:10:37.97 +34:15:55.0 | 5924 5856 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 04:10:37.98 +34:15:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51908_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 51908_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 11.58 | 03:51:52.62 +30:25:23.8 | 3678 3399 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 03:51:52.63 +30:25:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87946_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 87946_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 11.06 | 03:50:28.21 +27:40:06.4 | 3552 1733 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 03:50:28.19 +27:40:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54567_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 54567_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 12.34 | 04:32:50.28 +29:42:40.1 | 9043 3422 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 04:32:50.29 +29:42:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86163_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 86163_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 03.33734 | 2461255.83734 | 6.88 | 04:22:34.86 +25:37:46.1 | 7952 0804 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_030640_TTUQ1b1x1_169244_ENMfjgPS/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_03-05-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits |
**** FOUND 04:22:34.88 +25:37:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:13:51.64 +34:01:35.8
########### Completed Tau-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
04:13:51.64 +34:01:35.8
###################################################################################
04:13:51.64 +34:01:35.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461255.83643375 -observatory V36
07:31:01.04 +20:13:17.0 Mercury (0.0mag)
11:45:19.01 +01:20:41.3 Venus (-4.3mag)
05:35:00.89 +23:26:07.8 Mars (1.3mag)
08:38:31.66 +18:57:29.1 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:41.49 +03:18:31.2 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:11:07.97 +20:55:24.0 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:21.79 +00:15:05.6 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:28:36.72 -23:28:15.7 Pluto (14.4mag)
00:18:32.20 +04:45:09.4 Moon (-11.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 3 03:12 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461255.83643375:
08:38:27.15 +18:57:48.6 Io (6.0mag)
08:38:23.11 +18:58:06.3 Europa (6.3mag)
08:38:28.36 +18:57:40.8 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:38:05.48 +18:59:18.6 Callisto (6.7mag)
08:36:11.26 +18:53:55.8 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:38:34.27 +18:57:19.2 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:35:39.99 +18:53:25.4 Elara (17.7mag)
08:42:35.71 +18:39:17.1 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:42:01.77 +19:06:43.4 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:51.40 +03:18:38.1 Titan (8.4mag)
00:56:42.92 +03:18:13.5 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:36.78 +03:16:26.2 Iapetus (11.2mag)
00:56:38.93 +03:18:59.5 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:56:10.28 +03:12:21.0 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 3 03:12 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461255.83643375:
18:44:27.45 -25:22:10.0 JWST
16:38:59.23 +45:21:23.2 Chandra
05:09:54.26 +45:43:47.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 3 03:12 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461255.83643375 -observatory V36
03:07:58.98 +16:57:08.4 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:03:26.70 -34:38:59.4 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:49:11.64 -68:43:41.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:08:28.87 +32:53:31.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:28:39.92 +35:13:41.8 16.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:42:36.30 +31:42:58.4 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:38:32.58 +26:37:22.7 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:17:03.43 +28:41:25.7 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:25:34.98 +05:16:59.4 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:11:46.16 -12:06:02.2 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:17:20.00 +66:30:43.2 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:53:07.35 -12:28:33.3 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:02:31.35 +31:07:35.8 15.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:07:52.41 +15:37:12.2 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:09:25.41 +42:44:54.3 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:17:49.76 +48:51:43.6 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:11:08.36 -13:02:22.9 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:52:57.34 +25:00:38.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:28:36.86 -15:29:11.2 17.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:26:11.62 +21:12:23.3 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:55:17.86 +02:39:59.1 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:05:24.05 +78:15:53.1 16.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:05:23.19 +46:04:38.7 17.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:42:49.34 +08:00:24.7 17.2mag A/2026 E1
21:52:42.85 -25:11:51.4 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:26:04.64 -03:06:16.7 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:33:05.33 +31:59:27.4 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:57:42.31 +06:14:31.3 17.2mag 63P/Wild
00:54:16.23 -05:17:20.4 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
05:24:21.78 +20:45:17.3 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:42:23.68 -22:56:55.4 17.9mag 84P/Giclas
02:55:36.26 +13:18:09.5 16.6mag 88P/Howell
07:43:12.58 +28:17:53.5 16.1mag 93P/Lovas
03:52:46.48 +14:59:00.5 17.7mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
05:40:16.64 +30:45:49.4 16.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:06:51.39 +27:27:20.4 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:34:01.70 -08:22:43.5 17.0mag 124P/Mrkos
05:29:16.01 +21:11:08.6 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:20:03.58 +19:07:20.9 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:04:00.18 +03:25:49.8 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:22:05.50 -19:51:55.3 14.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
06:59:07.51 +37:29:05.2 15.7mag 162P/SidingSpring
16:34:42.62 +36:38:03.1 12.5mag 169P/NEAT
02:33:45.16 +09:23:38.1 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:39:18.24 -09:44:25.2 17.6mag 235P/LINEAR
20:25:49.92 -52:47:53.2 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
03:07:52.16 +23:04:10.0 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
06:50:33.63 +37:46:57.5 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:09:02.86 +03:40:21.3 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski
08:56:25.26 +18:36:47.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
08:28:28.36 +37:09:50.8 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 3 03:12 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 3 03:12 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug 3 03:12 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
13:56:53.901 -08:38:11.11 AT 2026urb 2026-07-10.09 21.2904
13:54:10.889 -08:23:55.36 AT 2026ura 2026-07-10.09 22.3183
13:54:08.534 -07:13:49.93 AT 2026uqz 2026-07-10.09 21.3674
21:08:30.722 -24:28:14.91 AT 2026uqy 2026-07-10.34 22.6821
19:36:58.373 -21:42:17.03 AT 2026uqx 2026-07-09.23 23.159
20:44:07.484 -21:01:35.00 AT 2026uqw 2026-07-09.31 23.0996
19:38:33.301 -21:29:24.48 AT 2026uqv 2026-07-09.23 23.3974
19:53:21.622 -21:02:37.45 AT 2026uqu 2026-07-09.24 22.9664
19:51:47.480 -21:22:43.49 AT 2026uqt 2026-07-09.24 23.0505
19:48:33.045 -21:19:41.03 AT 2026uqs 2026-07-09.23 23.2639
21:38:33.144 -17:23:10.17 AT 2026uqr 2026-07-09.29 23.2028
19:30:17.464 -19:22:43.60 AT 2026uqq 2026-07-09.26 22.9316
03:49:20.579 -48:35:22.65 AT 2026uqp 2026-07-09.42 22.9951
21:29:22.607 -18:53:04.27 AT 2026uqo 2026-07-09.29 23.2945
00:36:53.932 -44:10:51.43 AT 2026uqn 2026-07-09.41 23.8057
19:59:10.521 -19:34:34.05 AT 2026uqm 2026-07-09.24 23.1419
20:00:57.808 -19:42:57.80 AT 2026uql 2026-07-09.24 22.6536
20:01:28.696 -18:37:38.63 AT 2026uqk 2026-07-09.24 23.3834
19:54:33.149 -19:25:04.99 AT 2026uqj 2026-07-09.24 22.0922
19:38:52.087 -21:51:55.98 AT 2026uqi 2026-07-09.23 22.4832
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Aug 3 03:12 tns_transients_list.txt