Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference image | 2026 02 12.25171 | 2461083.75171 | 13.56 | 04:21:47.94 +84:46:14.6 | 5851 3925 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits |
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 02 12.25237 | 2461083.75237 | 13.38 | 04:21:46.62 +84:46:15.3 | 5852 3931 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 03.28336 | 2461255.78336 | 12.51 | 04:21:48.28 +84:46:14.0 | 3509 3315 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits |
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 03.28404 | 2461255.78404 | 12.49 | 04:21:49.16 +84:46:14.9 | 3509 3310 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 03.2837 2461255.7837 12.50 04:21:48.72 +84:46:14.4
127.47312 23.87928 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 5.3 pix
The object was found in VSX
3" NSVS J0421466+844616
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.955 R1 Y 0.711 R1 284.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:21:48.72 +84:46:14.4: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:21:48.72 +84:46:14.4: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing Cam-01-Q1b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 547993 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 547993 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits_preview.png'
Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits_preview.png'
Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 661.6740 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 620.8029 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2129.7542 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 645.6499 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2127.9468 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 644.8692 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.21874 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-03T01:47:52.6830640' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-03T06:47:52.6830640' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61255.2832486457 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-03T06:48:02.5849499' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61255.2833632408 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 89.7506237765228 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 85.0312662254488 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.8955555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 3.70055555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.00053122098823 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29501 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29501 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 45.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.800544 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits :) Spent 0.516040 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-03T01:48:50.8262750' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-03T06:48:50.8262750' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61255.2839215971 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-03T06:49:00.7268175' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61255.2840361805 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 89.7506232604093 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 85.0312662680139 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.9086111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 3.71944444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.99974493141105 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29501 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29501 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 45.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.800544 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits :) Spent 0.510894 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461255.78336439 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:41.472 +84:58:22.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:41.472 +84:58:22.84 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0561 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:42.634 +84:58:55.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:42.634 +84:58:55.75 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0470 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:57:41.472 +84:58:22.84 Second-epoch second image center 05:57:42.634 +84:58:55.75 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00915 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ANpl7VUcOX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8WdO4Y0DYz Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ecA3tnnmNG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i2N26GWhIw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) 'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt' Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.843350 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.843350 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=6.0) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec +75.8292 to +89.9114 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec 75.8292 to 89.9114 deg Loaded 33178 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7284 out of 7665 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7665 out of 12185 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 3.1 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 3.1 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 15.2 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.ANpl7VUcOX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=848, bad_region=0, passed=12096 Got 12096 stars (including 11236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3580 through 0 to 179.5073, gap 179.5073 to 181.3580 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3577 through 0 to 179.5070, gap 179.5070 to 181.3577 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1173 n_q2=1016 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1455 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.8WdO4Y0DYz (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=862, bad_region=0, passed=12185 Got 12185 stars (including 11310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0696 through 0 to 179.5067, gap 179.5067 to 180.0696 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0710 through 0 to 179.5079, gap 179.5079 to 180.0710 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5413) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.225 n_q1=1180 n_q2=1019 n_q3=1259 n_q4=1464 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ecA3tnnmNG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=361, bad_region=0, passed=7403 Got 7403 stars (including 7041 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7403 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0295 through 0 to 179.9699, gap 179.9699 to 180.0295 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7403 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0260 through 0 to 179.9667, gap 179.9667 to 180.0260 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7403 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7403 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=9.514 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.798 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.372 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.389 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.310 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.349 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4907 robust_rms_before=0.861 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.293 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.310 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.330 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.349 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.330 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.239 n_q1=1404 n_q2=1143 n_q3=1343 n_q4=1017 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.i2N26GWhIw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=362, bad_region=0, passed=7357 Got 7357 stars (including 6990 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7357 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0302 through 0 to 179.9696, gap 179.9696 to 180.0302 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7357 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0271 through 0 to 179.9665, gap 179.9665 to 180.0271 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7357 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7357 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5401) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=9.599 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.463 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.373 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.381 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.305 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.344 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4909 robust_rms_before=0.856 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.285 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.305 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.337 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.344 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.337 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1406 n_q2=1150 n_q3=1338 n_q4=1015 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.272 worst_q_ratio=1.278 ref2=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits sigma_overall=0.255 worst_q_ratio=1.306 new1=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.284 worst_q_ratio=1.117 new2=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits sigma_overall=0.273 worst_q_ratio=1.132 reference average sigma_overall=0.2635 worst_q_ratio=1.292 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251_astrometric_residuals.png (4922 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251_astrometric_residuals.png (4909 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20722_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 20722_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 04:13:05.55 +86:52:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21489_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 21489_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 11.02 04:13:04.40 +86:52:28.7 3931 4508 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 06:23:25.61 +80:04:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 11.05 06:23:25.60 +80:04:17.5 5520 0283 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 02:43:16.20 +81:08:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 10607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 10607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 10.18 02:43:16.25 +81:08:13.4 0781 2583 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 04:55:34.51 +80:57:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:41.472 +84:58:22.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:41.472 +84:58:22.84 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0561 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:42.634 +84:58:55.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:42.634 +84:58:55.75 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0470 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:57:41.472 +84:58:22.84 Second-epoch second image center 05:57:42.634 +84:58:55.75 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00915 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.naHNKkKdGc Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3cxuAHTJth Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RDZz2Dx6fH Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XpV1wMDyE1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_ Discovery image 3 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 10.60 04:55:34.49 +80:57:33.7 3381 0934 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits .fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.714550 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.714550 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=4.6) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 75116 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec +75.7501 to +89.9630 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec 75.7501 to 89.9630 deg Loaded 33600 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6759 out of 7815 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7815 out of 75116 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 49 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 2.0 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 2.9 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 2.9 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 15.4 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.naHNKkKdGc (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=4540, bad_region=2, passed=75560 Got 75560 stars (including 70879 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75560 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0704 through 0 to 179.9879, gap 179.9879 to 180.0704 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0705 through 0 to 179.9881, gap 179.9881 to 180.0705 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.227 n_q1=1150 n_q2=1043 n_q3=1285 n_q4=1444 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.3cxuAHTJth (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4531, bad_region=0, passed=75103 Got 75103 stars (including 70436 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75103 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0694 through 0 to 179.9961, gap 179.9961 to 180.0694 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0711 through 0 to 179.9966, gap 179.9966 to 180.0711 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.218 n_q1=1153 n_q2=1048 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1448 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.RDZz2Dx6fH (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1552, bad_region=11, passed=38323 Got 38323 stars (including 36711 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38323 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0097 through 0 to 179.9950, gap 179.9950 to 180.0097 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38323 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0260 through 0 to 179.9958, gap 179.9958 to 180.0260 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38323 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38323 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5405) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=1387 n_q2=1138 n_q3=1359 n_q4=1029 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.XpV1wMDyE1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1527, bad_region=10, passed=38093 Got 38093 stars (including 36502 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38093 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0014 through 0 to 179.9919, gap 179.9919 to 180.0014 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4917 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38093 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0271 through 0 to 179.9926, gap 179.9926 to 180.0271 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38093 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38093 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4916 stars left (next iteration limit 5408) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits N_match=4916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1396 n_q2=1134 n_q3=1358 n_q4=1028 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:13:28.09 +84:02:25.1: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:11:11.53 +83:35:19.5: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:39:25.17 +82:29:54.4: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 09:36:26.68 +81:21:16.5: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:17:36.22 +84:13:32.0: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 07:09:20.25 +85:35:58.4: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:51:51.79 +86:16:02.3: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:05:19.46 +83:28:01.3: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:11:11.53 +83:35:19.5: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:13:28.09 +84:02:25.1: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:11.53 +83:35:19.5: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8824 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:28.09 +84:02:25.1: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5855 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:48:15.36 +81:52:39.1: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:39:25.17 +82:29:54.4: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:17:36.22 +84:13:32.0: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:25.17 +82:29:54.4: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1176 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:36.22 +84:13:32.0: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1282 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 07:09:20.25 +85:35:58.4: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 09:36:26.68 +81:21:16.5: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:05:19.46 +83:28:01.3: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:20.25 +85:35:58.4: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9073 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:26.68 +81:21:16.5: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7459 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:51:51.79 +86:16:02.3: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:19.46 +83:28:01.3: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9255 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:51:51.79 +86:16:02.3: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3708 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:48:15.36 +81:52:39.1: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:48:15.36 +81:52:39.1: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3375 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:16:55.40 +84:11:28.6: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:45:35.09 +83:37:51.7: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:16:55.40 +84:11:28.6: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:55.40 +84:11:28.6: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2073 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:24:18.94 +84:31:15.2: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:09:09.79 +85:10:46.8: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 07:16:45.46 +85:11:25.4: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:45:35.09 +83:37:51.7: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:45:35.09 +83:37:51.7: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5778 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:14:54.62 +84:21:29.8: 15.02 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 06:37:52.41 +85:21:22.2: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:24:18.94 +84:31:15.2: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:24:18.94 +84:31:15.2: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7421 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:09:09.79 +85:10:46.8: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:09.79 +85:10:46.8: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7402 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 07:16:45.46 +85:11:25.4: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:45.46 +85:11:25.4: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6834 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:21:48.72 +84:46:14.4: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:14:54.62 +84:21:29.8: 15.15 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:14:54.62 +84:21:29.8: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1977 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 06:37:52.41 +85:21:22.2: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:52.41 +85:21:22.2: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1499 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:21:48.72 +84:46:14.4: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:21:48.72 +84:46:14.4: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4962 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57632.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91172_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 91172_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 01:22:40.92 +85:18:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91179_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 91179_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 14.01 01:22:40.48 +85:18:53.3 2107 5137 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 02:29:03.45 +82:12:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91181_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 91181_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.29 02:29:03.45 +82:12:42.0 1070 3247 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 02:46:54.69 +84:36:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 93010_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 93010_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 11.88 02:46:54.69 +84:36:27.4 2367 3975 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 00:27:21.07 +86:54:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 93832_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 93832_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 12.25 00:27:20.89 +86:54:59.2 2880 5943 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.28336 2461255.78336 12.62 03:13:28.01 +84:02:24.9 2425 3460 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 93977_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 93977_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 12.55 03:13:28.17 +84:02:25.2 2425 3454 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 02:46:16.57 +82:48:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94068_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 94068_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 12.75 02:46:16.60 +82:48:52.5 1572 3234 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 04:10:45.27 +80:41:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94325_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 94325_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 12.67 04:10:45.54 +80:41:31.8 2310 1144 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.28336 2461255.78336 12.85 03:11:10.80 +83:35:20.0 2221 3275 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94346_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 94346_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 12.92 03:11:12.26 +83:35:19.0 2221 3269 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 07:29:48.93 +82:24:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94390_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 94390_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 12.84 07:29:48.80 +82:24:04.0 6601 2042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 02:18:12.20 +89:17:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94598_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 94598_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 12.93 02:17:51.21 +89:17:33.0 4380 5970 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.28336 2461255.78336 12.75 09:36:26.78 +81:21:19.2 9057 3293 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94679_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 94679_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 12.74 09:36:26.58 +81:21:13.8 9058 3286 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.28336 2461255.78336 12.92 05:05:19.50 +83:28:01.9 3917 2371 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94730_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 94730_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 12.93 05:05:19.42 +83:28:00.7 3917 2365 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.28336 2461255.78336 12.93 07:09:20.47 +85:35:58.3 5592 3718 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94861_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 94861_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 12.89 07:09:20.03 +85:35:58.4 5592 3712 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 04:27:23.53 +80:51:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94891_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 94891_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 12.93 04:27:23.36 +80:51:08.1 2719 1075 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95279_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 95279_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 12.95 01:05:02.56 +82:15:02.5 0250 4763 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.28336 2461255.78336 13.12 04:39:25.08 +82:29:54.8 3305 1930 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95348_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 95348_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.12 04:39:25.26 +82:29:54.0 3305 1925 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.28336 2461255.78336 13.15 05:17:36.29 +84:13:31.5 4194 2785 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95377_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 95377_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.11 05:17:36.15 +84:13:32.6 4194 2780 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.28336 2461255.78336 13.32 01:51:52.72 +86:16:01.6 2768 5105 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95525_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 95525_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.43 01:51:50.86 +86:16:03.0 2768 5100 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 23:55:57.75 +85:54:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95570_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 95570_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.44 23:55:56.71 +85:54:45.2 2247 6192 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.28336 2461255.78336 13.33 02:48:15.44 +81:52:39.2 1188 2817 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95588_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 95588_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.34 02:48:15.29 +81:52:39.0 1188 2812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 02:36:37.27 +81:39:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95610_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 95610_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.38 02:36:37.59 +81:39:20.1 0915 2906 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 05:19:01.43 +81:13:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95653_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 95653_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.12 05:19:01.81 +81:13:20.2 3950 0984 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 02:36:40.10 +89:12:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95657_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 95657_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.29 02:36:42.53 +89:12:53.7 4366 5911 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.28336 2461255.78336 13.25 05:16:55.39 +84:11:30.3 4181 2766 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95691_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 95691_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.17 05:16:55.42 +84:11:26.9 4180 2760 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95700_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 95700_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.48 01:25:46.76 +81:50:04.7 0171 4264 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95710_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 95710_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.34 02:50:21.73 +81:14:17.5 0941 2507 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 04:03:05.44 +81:13:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95851_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 95851_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.08 04:03:05.70 +81:13:05.7 2288 1511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 23:45:10.07 +88:51:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96210_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 96210_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.37 23:45:08.48 +88:51:22.7 4033 6248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 02:59:24.97 +85:11:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96286_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 96286_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.49 02:59:24.87 +85:11:50.5 2738 4109 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 02:55:07.15 +82:23:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96365_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 96365_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.41 02:55:07.66 +82:23:40.0 1512 2933 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 04:08:42.44 +86:38:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96418_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 96418_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.23 04:08:41.54 +86:38:23.7 3837 4397 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.28336 2461255.78336 13.58 02:45:34.30 +83:37:52.1 1924 3589 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96457_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 96457_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.57 02:45:35.89 +83:37:51.3 1924 3583 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.28336 2461255.78336 13.73 01:24:18.74 +84:31:14.1 1670 4936 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96857_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 96857_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.77 01:24:19.15 +84:31:16.2 1671 4931 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96907_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 96907_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.71 01:19:30.47 +82:13:33.9 0341 4478 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.28336 2461255.78336 13.67 04:09:09.48 +85:10:46.3 3457 3608 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97282_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 97282_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.84 04:09:10.10 +85:10:47.4 3458 3603 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97366_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 97366_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.80 02:18:22.99 +81:48:04.4 0732 3271 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.28336 2461255.78336 13.72 07:16:45.21 +85:11:25.6 5760 3517 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97724_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 97724_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.65 07:16:45.70 +85:11:25.2 5760 3512 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97734_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 97734_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.60 02:55:16.07 +82:07:30.1 1400 2814 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97862_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 97862_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.91 03:25:58.42 +81:27:34.6 1646 2079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97934_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 97934_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.98 03:02:52.69 +81:07:33.5 1105 2257 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98052_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 98052_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 13.91 00:37:35.85 +83:22:04.0 0774 5442 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.28336 2461255.78336 14.20 02:14:55.32 +84:21:28.9 1953 4241 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98166_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 98166_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 14.20 02:14:53.92 +84:21:30.7 1953 4237 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 03.28336 2461255.78336 14.16 06:37:52.85 +85:21:21.5 5270 3479 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-47-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57632_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 Preparing report for the candidate 57632_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66976_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 66976_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 14.14 06:37:51.97 +85:21:22.9 5270 3474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 12.33 05:33:31.12 +81:45:17.3 4308 1267 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 06:23:25.59 +80:04:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 11.09 06:23:25.60 +80:04:17.7 5520 0283 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 02:43:16.22 +81:08:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 48263_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 48263_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 10.30 02:43:16.25 +81:08:13.5 0781 2583 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits **** FOUND 04:55:34.53 +80:57:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66492_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 The candidate 66492_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 10.59 04:55:34.55 +80:57:33.7 3381 0934 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.8") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 04:21:48.72 +84:46:14.4 ########### Completed Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 04:21:48.72 +84:46:14.4 ################################################################################### 04:21:48.72 +84:46:14.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 04:21:48.72 +84:46:14.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 04:21:48.72 +84:46:14.4 -- a known variable star Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 04:21:48.72 +84:46:14.4 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461255.78336439 -observatory V36 07:30:46.56 +20:12:58.0 Mercury (0.0mag) 11:45:07.29 +01:22:14.9 Venus (-4.3mag) 05:34:51.51 +23:25:59.2 Mars (1.3mag) 08:38:28.74 +18:57:39.6 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:41.63 +03:18:32.9 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:11:07.55 +20:55:22.9 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:21.95 +00:15:06.8 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:28:37.03 -23:28:14.4 Pluto (14.4mag) 00:16:46.82 +04:24:34.2 Moon (-11.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 3 01:53 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461255.78336439: 08:38:24.71 +18:57:56.8 Io (6.0mag) 08:38:20.15 +18:58:16.9 Europa (6.3mag) 08:38:26.16 +18:57:48.2 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:38:02.62 +18:59:28.7 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:36:08.43 +18:54:04.3 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:38:32.64 +18:57:24.1 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:35:37.12 +18:53:34.6 Elara (17.7mag) 08:42:32.75 +18:39:29.1 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:41:59.06 +19:06:53.2 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:51.68 +03:18:39.2 Titan (8.4mag) 00:56:42.68 +03:18:15.3 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:36.77 +03:16:27.5 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:56:39.32 +03:19:01.2 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:56:10.49 +03:12:23.2 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 3 01:53 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461255.78336439: 18:44:29.69 -25:24:36.2 JWST 16:32:38.26 +46:49:52.3 Chandra 03:05:47.02 +60:59:02.9 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 3 01:53 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461255.78336439 -observatory V36 03:07:55.17 +16:56:50.9 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:03:27.99 -34:39:00.2 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:49:08.59 -68:43:34.6 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:08:27.96 +32:53:27.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:28:29.65 +35:11:50.9 16.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:42:38.87 +31:43:07.7 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:38:29.28 +26:37:25.7 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:17:00.48 +28:41:34.5 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:25:32.82 +05:16:58.4 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:11:45.78 -12:05:55.3 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:17:24.43 +66:31:00.6 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:53:11.06 -12:28:15.2 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:02:27.62 +31:07:27.2 15.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:07:53.10 +15:37:12.3 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:09:29.65 +42:44:39.1 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:17:54.35 +48:51:28.2 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:11:05.69 -13:02:26.1 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:52:55.11 +25:01:11.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:28:35.28 -15:28:46.4 17.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:26:07.28 +21:12:34.8 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:55:16.07 +02:40:11.1 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:05:26.51 +78:16:09.6 16.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:05:21.61 +46:04:33.4 17.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:42:46.76 +08:00:02.7 17.2mag A/2026 E1 21:52:39.46 -25:10:26.5 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:26:02.77 -03:06:05.5 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:33:01.23 +31:59:09.0 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:57:35.74 +06:15:33.9 17.2mag 63P/Wild 00:54:16.15 -05:17:14.9 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 05:24:14.39 +20:45:18.1 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:42:26.66 -22:56:32.6 17.9mag 84P/Giclas 02:55:32.71 +13:17:52.9 16.6mag 88P/Howell 07:43:04.11 +28:18:17.2 16.1mag 93P/Lovas 03:52:37.75 +14:57:46.7 17.7mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 05:40:06.00 +30:46:03.8 16.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:06:43.71 +27:27:50.9 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:33:55.37 -08:21:29.2 17.0mag 124P/Mrkos 05:29:11.18 +21:11:08.1 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:19:57.97 +19:07:28.7 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:04:00.48 +03:25:49.8 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:22:05.90 -19:52:03.0 14.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:58:56.23 +37:28:49.8 15.7mag 162P/SidingSpring 16:35:26.97 +36:34:42.3 12.5mag 169P/NEAT 02:33:38.95 +09:23:31.4 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:39:16.95 -09:44:12.1 17.6mag 235P/LINEAR 20:25:52.62 -52:47:47.7 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 03:07:42.89 +23:02:45.7 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 06:50:23.87 +37:46:58.1 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:09:02.03 +03:40:41.9 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 08:56:22.32 +18:36:56.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:28:23.61 +37:10:07.5 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 3 01:53 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 3 01:53 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug 3 01:53 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 13:56:53.901 -08:38:11.11 AT 2026urb 2026-07-10.09 21.2904 13:54:10.889 -08:23:55.36 AT 2026ura 2026-07-10.09 22.3183 13:54:08.534 -07:13:49.93 AT 2026uqz 2026-07-10.09 21.3674 21:08:30.722 -24:28:14.91 AT 2026uqy 2026-07-10.34 22.6821 19:36:58.373 -21:42:17.03 AT 2026uqx 2026-07-09.23 23.159 20:44:07.484 -21:01:35.00 AT 2026uqw 2026-07-09.31 23.0996 19:38:33.301 -21:29:24.48 AT 2026uqv 2026-07-09.23 23.3974 19:53:21.622 -21:02:37.45 AT 2026uqu 2026-07-09.24 22.9664 19:51:47.480 -21:22:43.49 AT 2026uqt 2026-07-09.24 23.0505 19:48:33.045 -21:19:41.03 AT 2026uqs 2026-07-09.23 23.2639 21:38:33.144 -17:23:10.17 AT 2026uqr 2026-07-09.29 23.2028 19:30:17.464 -19:22:43.60 AT 2026uqq 2026-07-09.26 22.9316 03:49:20.579 -48:35:22.65 AT 2026uqp 2026-07-09.42 22.9951 21:29:22.607 -18:53:04.27 AT 2026uqo 2026-07-09.29 23.2945 00:36:53.932 -44:10:51.43 AT 2026uqn 2026-07-09.41 23.8057 19:59:10.521 -19:34:34.05 AT 2026uqm 2026-07-09.24 23.1419 20:00:57.808 -19:42:57.80 AT 2026uql 2026-07-09.24 22.6536 20:01:28.696 -18:37:38.63 AT 2026uqk 2026-07-09.24 23.3834 19:54:33.149 -19:25:04.99 AT 2026uqj 2026-07-09.24 22.0922 19:38:52.087 -21:51:55.98 AT 2026uqi 2026-07-09.23 22.4832 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Aug 3 01:55 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 2 2026 08 03.28404 2461255.78404 11.73 06:23:15.06 +80:00:50.8 5520 0248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015036_TTUQ1b1x1_589442_lqQISnsm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_01-48-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
