This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4550 2461254.9550 10.78 06:29:57.38 +16:35:44.2
195.74625 2.88940 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" TY Gem
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.000 pg < 16.300 pg 2434820.00000 410.800000000000 M9
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:29:57.38 +16:35:44.2: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:29:57.38 +16:35:44.2: 15.73 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.73 +/- 0.35
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
TY Gem,2461254.9550,10.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
TY Gem 20260802.4550 10.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4550 2461254.9550 10.04 06:32:05.84 +14:31:14.6
197.82742 2.39043 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" AS Gem
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.290 V Y 0.380 V 2452821.60000 82.570334000000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:32:05.84 +14:31:14.6: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:32:05.84 +14:31:14.6: 10.95 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.03 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AS Gem,2461254.9550,10.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AS Gem 20260802.4550 10.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4550 2461254.9550 11.26 06:25:14.10 +17:01:53.8
194.83519 2.09049 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" GN Ori
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.800 V < 14.600 V 2453076.00000 117.100000000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:25:14.10 +17:01:53.8: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:25:14.10 +17:01:53.8: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4550* 06 25 14.10 +17 01 53.8 11.3 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GN Ori,2461254.9550,11.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GN Ori 20260802.4550 11.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4550 2461254.9550 11.23 06:26:52.73 +10:23:49.8
200.89168 -0.64937 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSV 16862
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.300 : V < 16.200 V 2451433.00000 466.000000000000 M7.5III-M9
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:26:52.73 +10:23:49.8: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:26:52.73 +10:23:49.8: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 16862,2461254.9550,11.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 16862 20260802.4550 11.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4550 2461254.9550 11.81 06:18:03.66 +10:31:16.9
199.76485 -2.50577 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J061804+1031.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.140 V Y 0.950 V 2452729.20000 114.153571000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:18:03.66 +10:31:16.9: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:18:03.66 +10:31:16.9: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4550* 06 18 03.66 +10 31 16.9 11.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J061804+1031.2,2461254.9550,11.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J061804+1031.2 20260802.4550 11.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4550 2461254.9550 11.15 06:23:18.39 +09:50:39.5
200.97008 -1.68498 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J062318+0950.6
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.390 V Y 0.220 V 2452465.20000 89.700000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:23:18.39 +09:50:39.5: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:23:18.39 +09:50:39.5: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J062318+0950.6,2461254.9550,11.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J062318+0950.6 20260802.4550 11.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4550 2461254.9550 10.91 06:28:57.54 +14:36:34.0
197.39760 1.75797 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J062858+1436.6
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.120 V Y 0.770 V 2452934.20000 97.647039000000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:28:57.54 +14:36:34.0: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:28:57.54 +14:36:34.0: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J062858+1436.6,2461254.9550,10.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J062858+1436.6 20260802.4550 10.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4550 2461254.9550 9.54 06:20:18.83 +11:21:08.0
199.29273 -1.62627 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" EO Ori
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.170 V 12.800 V 2453108.00000 : 278.000000000000 M2-M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:20:18.83 +11:21:08.0: 10.29 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:20:18.83 +11:21:08.0: 10.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.45 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4550* 06 20 18.83 +11 21 08.0 9.5 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
EO Ori,2461254.9550,9.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
EO Ori 20260802.4550 9.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81662337 23.12.2025 07:35:46.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
First image: 2461032.81662337 23.12.2025 07:35:46.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Last image: 2461254.95532425 02.08.2026 10:55:30.015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28017
Objects passed selection criteria: 27843
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17278.5
Average stars matched: 16440.2 (95.1486 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253100 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 06:00:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81662337 23.12.2025 07:35:46.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
First image: 2461032.81662337 23.12.2025 07:35:46.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Last image: 2461254.95532425 02.08.2026 10:55:30.015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 95
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 203310
Objects passed selection criteria: 202691
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 131470
Average stars matched: 124355 (94.5877 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 667748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 06:04:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461254.95466009
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits'
wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits'
wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:13:27.287 +13:59:26.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:13:23.768 +14:03:30.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:13:27.287 +13:59:26.52
Second-epoch image center 06:13:23.768 +14:03:30.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0692 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:13:24.271 +14:04:11.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:13:27.287 +13:59:26.52
Second-epoch image center 06:13:24.271 +14:04:11.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0801 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:13:23.768 +14:03:30.23
Second-epoch second image center 06:13:24.271 +14:04:11.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01166 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xJC0nPeN6h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZoOIX4UwJv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1zzKs9KP5q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q8qInzCW4I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits and wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits and wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits and wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31404 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 85.0776 to 101.6789 deg, Dec +8.6286 to +19.2777 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 85.0776 to 101.6789 deg, Dec 8.6286 to 19.2777 deg
Loaded 17819 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13015 out of 14781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14781 out of 31404 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.949600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.949600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31404 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 85.0776 to 101.6789 deg, Dec +8.6286 to +19.2777 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 85.0776 to 101.6789 deg, Dec 8.6286 to 19.2777 deg
Loaded 17819 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13015 out of 14781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14781 out of 31404 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 31324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.9118 to 101.4962 deg, Dec +8.4421 to +19.3403 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.9118 to 101.4962 deg, Dec 8.4421 to 19.3403 deg
Loaded 18085 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12980 out of 14663 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14663 out of 31324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
2.1 pix Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
15.2 mag. Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
12.3 mag. fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
12.2 mag. fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.2 (SNR ) 10.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xJC0nPeN6h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3718, bad_region=0, passed=31404
Got 31404 stars (including 27641 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31404 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5263)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=1170 n_q2=1223 n_q3=1237 n_q4=1153 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits -region wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZoOIX4UwJv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3619, bad_region=0, passed=31324
Got 31324 stars (including 27657 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4787 stars left (next iteration limit 5266)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits N_match=4787 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=1017 n_q2=1324 n_q3=1130 n_q4=1316 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.226
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1zzKs9KP5q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=287, bad_region=0, passed=3477
Got 3477 stars (including 3186 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3477 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3059 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3002 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3002 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3062 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3006 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3006 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 3006 stars left (next iteration limit 3302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3006 robust_rms=7.941 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.622 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3006 robust_rms=0.578 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.049 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3006 robust_rms=0.436 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.659 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3006 robust_rms_before=1.327 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.541 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.436 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.772 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.659
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Image size: 945.4'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:13:23.859 +14:03:28.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3477 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1493759.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.327 -> 0.436 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=3006 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.729 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.515 n_q1=867 n_q2=534 n_q3=950 n_q4=655 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.557
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Q8qInzCW4I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=292, bad_region=0, passed=3374
Got 3374 stars (including 3076 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 2891 stars left (next iteration limit 3180)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2891 robust_rms=8.050 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.666 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2891 robust_rms=0.590 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.894 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2891 robust_rms=0.438 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.628 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2891 robust_rms_before=1.375 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.523 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.438 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.790 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.628
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 945.3'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:13:24.369 +14:04:10.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3374 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1493767.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.375 -> 0.438 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=2891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.694 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.548 n_q1=828 n_q2=518 n_q3=911 n_q4=634 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.444
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.257
ref2=Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits sigma_overall=0.407 worst_q_ratio=1.226
new1=fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits sigma_overall=0.468 worst_q_ratio=1.557
new2=fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits sigma_overall=0.480 worst_q_ratio=1.444
reference average sigma_overall=0.3935 worst_q_ratio=1.2415
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386_astrometric_residuals.png (4783 matched stars from wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042_astrometric_residuals.png (4787 matched stars from wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246_astrometric_residuals.png (3006 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247_astrometric_residuals.png (2891 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:08:32.00 +13:58:01.3: 8.35 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:08:32.00 +13:58:01.3: 8.56 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 8.44 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:32.00 +13:58:01.3: ref_mag=8.44 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.7519 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53250_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 53250_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03932_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 03932_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.63 +17:54:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ori-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:13:27.287 +13:59:26.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:13:23.768 +14:03:30.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:13:27.287 +13:59:26.52
Second-epoch image center 06:13:23.768 +14:03:30.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0692 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:13:24.271 +14:04:11.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:13:27.287 +13:59:26.52
Second-epoch image center 06:13:24.271 +14:04:11.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0801 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:13:23.768 +14:03:30.23
Second-epoch second image center 06:13:24.271 +14:04:11.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01166 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qyha1VixS9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G69PPaf9Q5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CdJFTa35EO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6olCXmoDyC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits and wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits and wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits and wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 229058 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 85.0776 to 101.6828 deg, Dec +8.6174 to +19.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 85.0776 to 101.6828 deg, Dec 8.6174 to 19.2791 deg
Loaded 17847 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9852 out of 15551 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15551 out of 229058 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.805100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.805100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 229058 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 85.0776 to 101.6828 deg, Dec +8.6174 to +19.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 85.0776 to 101.6828 deg, Dec 8.6174 to 19.2791 deg
Loaded 17847 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9852 out of 15551 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15551 out of 229058 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 230307 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.9070 to 101.4968 deg, Dec +8.4421 to +19.3422 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.9070 to 101.4968 deg, Dec 8.4421 to 19.3422 deg
Loaded 18095 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10167 out of 15481 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15481 out of 230307 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 73 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
1.9 pix Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
15.4 mag. Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.7 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qyha1VixS9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=66, blended=37651, bad_region=12, passed=228992
Got 228992 stars (including 190970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 228992 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 228992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 228992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 228992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4770 stars left (next iteration limit 5249)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits N_match=4770 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=1096 n_q2=1242 n_q3=1241 n_q4=1191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits -region wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.G69PPaf9Q5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=82, blended=35229, bad_region=4, passed=230225
Got 230225 stars (including 194609 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 230225 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 230225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 230225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 230225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1035 n_q2=1329 n_q3=1162 n_q4=1252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CdJFTa35EO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1381, bad_region=0, passed=35352
Got 35352 stars (including 33930 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35352 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4740 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4743 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4740 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4742 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4742 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4742 stars left (next iteration limit 5214)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=4742 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.649 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.518 n_q1=1321 n_q2=817 n_q3=1578 n_q4=1026 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.291
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6olCXmoDyC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1068, bad_region=0, passed=34253
Got 34253 stars (including 33132 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34253 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34253 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34253 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34253 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4736 stars left (next iteration limit 5211)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=4736 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.498 n_q1=1301 n_q2=830 n_q3=1581 n_q4=1024 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-54-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_055714_TTUQ1b1x1_1458353_8l0D6Lu4/wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:42:43.64 +08:51:17.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:13:44.84 +09:12:55.7: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:11:41.70 +12:28:17.2: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:41:09.26 +08:59:05.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:08:32.02 +13:58:00.7: 8.63 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:38:29.03 +18:02:40.7: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:08:37.11 +19:05:57.5: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:42:15.75 +09:32:41.8: 9.29 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:41:18.67 +09:12:48.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:41:49.68 +09:30:28.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:42:43.64 +08:51:17.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:43.64 +08:51:17.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:08:37.11 +19:05:57.5: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:42:15.75 +09:32:41.8: 9.26 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:08:32.02 +13:58:00.7: 8.81 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:38:29.03 +18:02:40.7: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:11:41.70 +12:28:17.2: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:13:44.84 +09:12:55.7: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.28 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:41:09.26 +08:59:05.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:09.26 +08:59:05.1: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 8.72 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:37.11 +19:05:57.5: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2549 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:15.75 +09:32:41.8: ref_mag=9.28 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6791 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:32.02 +13:58:00.7: ref_mag=8.72 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.6593 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:29.03 +18:02:40.7: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6515 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:11:41.70 +12:28:17.2: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3833 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:13:44.84 +09:12:55.7: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9732 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:41:18.67 +09:12:48.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:18.67 +09:12:48.2: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:41:49.68 +09:30:28.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:49.68 +09:30:28.8: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:38:07.65 +08:39:28.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:43:14.47 +09:21:50.7: 9.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:29:57.38 +16:35:44.2: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:41:51.52 +09:11:58.3: 9.56 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:42:35.93 +09:46:11.1: 9.85 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:38:07.65 +08:39:28.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:07.65 +08:39:28.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:41:32.80 +09:19:03.3: 9.73 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:42:30.11 +09:26:27.8: 9.94 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:43:18.73 +08:44:49.8: 9.59 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:41:22.11 +09:07:37.0: 10.11 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:43:18.73 +08:44:49.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:18.73 +08:44:49.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:43:14.47 +09:21:50.7: 9.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:41:51.52 +09:11:58.3: 9.50 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:29:57.38 +16:35:44.2: 15.73 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.79 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:42:35.93 +09:46:11.1: 9.79 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:14.47 +09:21:50.7: ref_mag=9.79 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2721 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.73 +/- 0.35
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:51.52 +09:11:58.3: ref_mag=9.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2248 delta=-0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:29:57.38 +16:35:44.2: ref_mag=15.73 +/- 0.35 new_mean_mag=10.7802 delta=4.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.82 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:35.93 +09:46:11.1: ref_mag=9.82 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2693 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:43:22.03 +09:12:06.4: 10.60 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:41:32.80 +09:19:03.3: 9.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.71 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:32.80 +09:19:03.3: ref_mag=9.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3064 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:41:22.11 +09:07:37.0: 10.07 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:42:30.11 +09:26:27.8: 9.91 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.09 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.93 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:22.11 +09:07:37.0: ref_mag=10.09 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7709 delta=-0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:30.11 +09:26:27.8: ref_mag=9.93 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6740 delta=-0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:33:14.62 +08:40:46.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:33:14.62 +08:40:46.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:14.62 +08:40:46.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:43:22.03 +09:12:06.4: 10.53 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.57 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:22.03 +09:12:06.4: ref_mag=10.57 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7906 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:43:06.64 +09:04:09.3: 10.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:43:53.50 +09:45:35.2: 10.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:39:54.27 +08:41:12.3: 10.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:42:30.47 +09:13:54.3: 10.28 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:39:54.27 +08:41:12.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:54.27 +08:41:12.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:42:34.75 +08:58:31.2: 10.17 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:42:44.27 +08:39:29.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:41:38.12 +09:03:24.1: 10.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:43:06.64 +09:04:09.3: 10.64 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:42:44.27 +08:39:29.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:44.27 +08:39:29.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.68 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:06.64 +09:04:09.3: ref_mag=10.68 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8024 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:43:53.50 +09:45:35.2: 10.26 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.28 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:41:11.16 +09:11:17.8: 10.34 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:53.50 +09:45:35.2: ref_mag=10.28 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8462 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:42:30.47 +09:13:54.3: 10.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.26 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:30.47 +09:13:54.3: ref_mag=10.26 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8341 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:42:14.59 +08:44:29.9: 10.42 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:42:14.59 +08:44:29.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:14.59 +08:44:29.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:42:34.75 +08:58:31.2: 10.08 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.12 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:34.75 +08:58:31.2: ref_mag=10.12 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8468 delta=-0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:41:38.12 +09:03:24.1: 10.38 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.40 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:38.12 +09:03:24.1: ref_mag=10.40 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9180 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:41:11.16 +09:11:17.8: 10.32 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.33 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:11.16 +09:11:17.8: ref_mag=10.33 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1203 delta=-0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 05:47:37.47 +15:01:50.1: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:12:12.67 +13:39:28.4: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 05:47:26.24 +12:16:41.9: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:19:07.01 +14:38:00.6: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 05:47:37.47 +15:01:50.1: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:37.47 +15:01:50.1: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2196 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:12:12.67 +13:39:28.4: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 05:47:26.24 +12:16:41.9: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:12:12.67 +13:39:28.4: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9960 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:26.24 +12:16:41.9: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4488 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:19:07.01 +14:38:00.6: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:07.01 +14:38:00.6: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1553 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:32:05.84 +14:31:14.6: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:25:14.10 +17:01:53.8: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:26:52.73 +10:23:49.8: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:32:05.84 +14:31:14.6: 10.95 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.03 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:32:05.84 +14:31:14.6: ref_mag=11.03 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0402 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:25:14.10 +17:01:53.8: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:25:14.10 +17:01:53.8: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2554 delta=2.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:26:52.73 +10:23:49.8: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:26:52.73 +10:23:49.8: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2241 delta=1.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:05:34.99 +13:58:54.8: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:18:03.66 +10:31:16.9: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:05:34.99 +13:58:54.8: 15.58 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:18:03.66 +10:31:16.9: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:05:34.99 +13:58:54.8: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.5369 delta=1.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:18:03.66 +10:31:16.9: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7775 delta=1.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:23:18.39 +09:50:39.5: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:28:57.54 +14:36:34.0: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:20:18.83 +11:21:08.0: 10.29 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:23:18.39 +09:50:39.5: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:23:18.39 +09:50:39.5: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1550 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:28:57.54 +14:36:34.0: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:28:57.54 +14:36:34.0: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9109 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:20:18.83 +11:21:08.0: 10.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.45 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:20:18.83 +11:21:08.0: ref_mag=10.45 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.5365 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out116263.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102507.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out104176.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out177982.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out184758.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186785.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out223608.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out266426.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out46076.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266167_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266167_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266168_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266168_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266181_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266181_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266190_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266190_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266191_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266191_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:20.24 +10:13:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266193_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266193_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:23.95 +17:38:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266196_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266196_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266203_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266203_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266295_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266295_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266303_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266303_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266320_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266320_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266323_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266323_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266330_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266330_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:42.91 +19:10:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266354_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266354_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:02.34 +19:13:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266357_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266357_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266398_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266398_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266401_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266401_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:20.68 +19:07:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266411_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266411_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266413_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266413_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266426_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 266426_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266427_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266427_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266454_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266454_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:36.09 +18:29:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266469_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266469_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266515_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266515_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266539_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266539_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266558_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266558_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266565_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266565_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266574_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266574_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266581_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266581_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266610_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266610_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266615_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266615_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266620_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266620_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266659_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266659_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266682_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266682_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266692_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266692_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266706_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266706_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266713_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266713_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:56.76 +13:56:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266751_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266751_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:27.29 +13:39:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266780_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266780_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:18.75 +17:37:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266805_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266805_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:03.40 +13:50:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266814_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266814_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:11.98 +08:41:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266838_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266838_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:23.61 +14:19:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266860_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266860_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:34.70 +14:02:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266865_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266865_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:29.28 +14:46:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266908_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266908_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:02.79 +14:11:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266940_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 266940_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267088_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 267088_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267116_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 267116_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267137_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 267137_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:26.68 +14:46:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267174_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 267174_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104176_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 104176_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202975_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 202975_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:46.09 +08:49:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35828_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 35828_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:17.44 +17:33:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46076_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 46076_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184758_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 184758_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21204_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 21204_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.62 +18:15:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186785_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 186785_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130991_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 130991_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178081_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 178081_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:53.74 +11:15:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26621_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 26621_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.63 +17:54:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116263_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 116263_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:34.99 +13:58:54.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.150 3345156134851679232 091.39605548035 +13.98169767234 13.1440 11.0610 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.150#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40307_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 40307_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:16.14 +17:21:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147876_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 147876_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:03.34 +12:39:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223608_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 223608_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102507_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 102507_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177982_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 177982_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173146_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 173146_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:48.21 +11:32:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197755_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 197755_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:17.21 +11:00:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227016_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 227016_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:17.54 +09:59:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135850_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 135850_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:59.00 +13:13:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225474_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 225474_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:58.62 +09:53:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32882_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 32882_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:24.31 +17:38:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62388_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 62388_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-55-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
