This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 11.73 06:14:13.00 +33:26:33.8
179.09626 7.53968 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia -0 1 1 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:14:13.00 +33:26:33.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:13.00 +33:26:33.8: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461254.9186,11.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260802.4186 11.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 12.51 06:05:05.41 +31:40:17.2
179.74848 5.00697 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.6" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina 3 0 3 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:05:05.41 +31:40:17.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:05.41 +31:40:17.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461254.9186,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260802.4186 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 9.11 06:03:25.11 +31:38:39.8
179.59894 4.68282 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" BB Aur
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.000 pg 12.400 pg 2427280.00000 704.000000000000 M3-M4S
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:03:25.11 +31:38:39.8: 10.02 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:25.11 +31:38:39.8: 10.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
BB Aur,2461254.9186,9.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
BB Aur 20260802.4186 9.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 10.66 06:05:00.93 +27:45:55.1
183.16346 3.09505 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V0354 Gem
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.900 V 12.300 V 2453039.00000 171.030459000000 S
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:05:00.93 +27:45:55.1: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:00.93 +27:45:55.1: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0354 Gem,2461254.9186,10.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0354 Gem 20260802.4186 10.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 11.11 06:18:32.96 +28:02:11.7
184.35237 5.85356 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J061833+2802.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.450 V Y 0.480 V 2452714.70000 55.458542000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:18:32.96 +28:02:11.7: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:32.96 +28:02:11.7: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J061833+2802.2,2461254.9186,11.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J061833+2802.2 20260802.4186 11.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 11.35 06:14:53.74 +29:42:13.0
182.49493 5.92400 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0614536+294214
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.392 g Y 0.844 g 2458509.91970 124.675405500000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:14:53.74 +29:42:13.0: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:53.74 +29:42:13.0: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0614536+294214,2461254.9186,11.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0614536+294214 20260802.4186 11.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 12.15 06:02:38.05 +29:07:04.5
181.72542 3.30010 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASASSN-V J060237.80+290705.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.390 V 14.020 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:02:38.05 +29:07:04.5: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:02:38.05 +29:07:04.5: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J060237.80+290705.9,2461254.9186,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J060237.80+290705.9 20260802.4186 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 12.03 06:15:11.65 +29:02:37.6
183.11141 5.67212 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 7093064
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.950 R1 11.300 R1 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:15:11.65 +29:02:37.6: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:15:11.65 +29:02:37.6: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 7093064,2461254.9186,12.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 7093064 20260802.4186 12.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 12.06 06:24:35.40 +33:28:48.3
180.05531 9.48452 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J062435.32+332849.2
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.220 V 13.650 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:24:35.40 +33:28:48.3: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:35.40 +33:28:48.3: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J062435.32+332849.2,2461254.9186,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J062435.32+332849.2 20260802.4186 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 12.31 05:37:14.32 +31:54:49.1
176.51768 0.04107 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J053714.34+315449.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.160 V 14.570 V 2458466.98890 59.262797200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:37:14.32 +31:54:49.1: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:37:14.32 +31:54:49.1: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J053714.34+315449.4,2461254.9186,12.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J053714.34+315449.4 20260802.4186 12.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 12.19 05:54:59.11 +27:44:34.7
182.08112 1.15727 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J055459.07+274433.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.141 r Y 0.550 r 2458585.65680 87.339674800000
The object was found in astcheck.721 Tabora -573 -0 573 15.6 0 0
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the predicted asteroid brightness, but the matched variable star above likely accounts for this object.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:54:59.11 +27:44:34.7: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:54:59.11 +27:44:34.7: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4186* 05 54 59.11 +27 44 34.7 12.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J055459.07+274433.9,2461254.9186,12.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J055459.07+274433.9 20260802.4186 12.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 11.90 05:28:53.06 +31:39:16.2
175.76754 -1.58879 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra 0 -1 1 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:28:53.06 +31:39:16.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:28:53.06 +31:39:16.2: 15.80 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.80 +/- 0.35
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461254.9186,11.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260802.4186 11.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 12.15 05:47:47.06 +28:43:50.4
180.42170 0.29847 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J054746.96+284350.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.751 g Y 0.573 g 2458207.75370 257.656142200000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:47:47.06 +28:43:50.4: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:47:47.06 +28:43:50.4: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J054746.96+284350.8,2461254.9186,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J054746.96+284350.8 20260802.4186 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 11.86 05:56:33.65 +28:48:39.5
181.33241 1.99443 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J055633.64+284840.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.310 V 13.660 V 2457443.80000 260.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:33.65 +28:48:39.5: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:33.65 +28:48:39.5: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J055633.64+284840.3,2461254.9186,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J055633.64+284840.3 20260802.4186 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 11.59 06:01:22.17 +28:33:06.0
182.08262 2.78037 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" BP Aur
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.900 pg 14.900 pg 306.000000000000 M6.5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:01:22.17 +28:33:06.0: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:22.17 +28:33:06.0: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
BP Aur,2461254.9186,11.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
BP Aur 20260802.4186 11.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 11.39 05:48:40.15 +26:28:29.9
182.45466 -0.69844 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V0422 Tau
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.500 pg 16.100 pg M7
ATTENTION: measured mag 11.39 is 4.1 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 15.50 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:48:40.15 +26:28:29.9: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:48:40.15 +26:28:29.9: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4186* 05 48 40.15 +26 28 29.9 11.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0422 Tau,2461254.9186,11.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0422 Tau 20260802.4186 11.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 11.32 05:58:51.70 +28:08:10.5
182.17005 2.09524 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J055852+2808.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.840 V Y 0.550 V 2452821.20000 66.501833000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:58:51.70 +28:08:10.5: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:51.70 +28:08:10.5: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4186* 05 58 51.70 +28 08 10.5 11.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J055852+2808.2,2461254.9186,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J055852+2808.2 20260802.4186 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 11.28 06:12:12.59 +25:36:23.3
185.83402 3.46090 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J061212.55+253622.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.560 V 12.720 V 2457101.80900 73.240000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:12:12.59 +25:36:23.3: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:12:12.59 +25:36:23.3: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J061212.55+253622.8,2461254.9186,11.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J061212.55+253622.8 20260802.4186 11.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4186 2461254.9186 10.87 05:47:50.68 +30:34:53.4
178.84399 1.26651 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J054750.67+303453.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.373 g Y 0.680 g 2458475.03910 284.885339100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:47:50.68 +30:34:53.4: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:47:50.68 +30:34:53.4: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J054750.67+303453.7,2461254.9186,10.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J054750.67+303453.7 20260802.4186 10.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461254.91896186 02.08.2026 10:03:08.305 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25167
Objects passed selection criteria: 24976
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15735.5
Average stars matched: 15229.2 (96.7828 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249832 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 05:05:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461254.91896186 02.08.2026 10:03:08.305 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 146
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 192851
Objects passed selection criteria: 192177
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 123682
Average stars matched: 118592 (95.8842 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 654240 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 05:07:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461254.91833903
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:56.754 +30:00:53.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:56.754 +30:00:53.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0216 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Image size: 944.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:58.144 +30:01:26.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:58.144 +30:01:26.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0276 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:56.754 +30:00:53.06
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:58.144 +30:01:26.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01057 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.89IC6RWvtX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.etMnAix7qA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits &> /tmp/tmp.45EQpvtpUZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bidbfc8d3z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec +24.3420 to +35.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec 24.3420 to 35.3116 deg
Loaded 17089 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12096 out of 13641 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13641 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.7 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.89IC6RWvtX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=0, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 24022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4793 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4793 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1003 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.etMnAix7qA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=0, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 23994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=1006 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1123 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.45EQpvtpUZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=0, passed=4434
Got 4434 stars (including 4226 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4434 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4107 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4048 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4048 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4108 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4049 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4049 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4049 stars left (next iteration limit 4452)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4049 robust_rms=7.071 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.494 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4049 robust_rms=0.617 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.711 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4049 robust_rms=0.518 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.635 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4049 robust_rms_before=1.341 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.505 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.518 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.667 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.635
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.667 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits N_match=4049 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.484 n_q1=1109 n_q2=641 n_q3=1513 n_q4=786 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.370
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Bidbfc8d3z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=257, bad_region=0, passed=4551
Got 4551 stars (including 4285 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4551 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4161 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4100 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4101 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4100 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4161 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4101 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4101 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4101 stars left (next iteration limit 4510)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4101 robust_rms=7.353 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.882 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4101 robust_rms=0.616 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.848 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4101 robust_rms=0.494 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.643 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4101 robust_rms_before=1.369 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.512 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.494 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.652 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.643
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.652 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits N_match=4101 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.632 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.493 n_q1=1116 n_q2=656 n_q3=1539 n_q4=790 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.275
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.304
ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.242
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits sigma_overall=0.490 worst_q_ratio=1.370
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits sigma_overall=0.496 worst_q_ratio=1.275
reference average sigma_overall=0.4535 worst_q_ratio=1.273
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4793 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4799 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192_astrometric_residuals.png (4049 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193_astrometric_residuals.png (4101 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:56.754 +30:00:53.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:56.754 +30:00:53.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0216 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Image size: 944.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:58.144 +30:01:26.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:58.144 +30:01:26.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0276 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:56.754 +30:00:53.06
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:58.144 +30:01:26.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01057 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0rlt1qJR4s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.N44CgCpFq2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aQbmEZcV6m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8Y38OWNphf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec +24.3244 to +35.3140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec 24.3244 to 35.3140 deg
Loaded 17179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9281 out of 14295 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14295 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 136 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 12.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0rlt1qJR4s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=79, blended=32424, bad_region=1, passed=212748
Got 212748 stars (including 179989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=1028 n_q2=1362 n_q3=1243 n_q4=1133 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.N44CgCpFq2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=32176, bad_region=4, passed=212590
Got 212590 stars (including 180083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1026 n_q2=1364 n_q3=1217 n_q4=1159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aQbmEZcV6m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1327, bad_region=4, passed=35813
Got 35813 stars (including 34430 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35813 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4777 stars left (next iteration limit 5253)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits N_match=4777 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.648 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.502 n_q1=1257 n_q2=735 n_q3=1866 n_q4=919 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8Y38OWNphf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1558, bad_region=4, passed=36344
Got 36344 stars (including 34724 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36344 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4784 stars left (next iteration limit 5261)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits N_match=4784 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.632 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.502 n_q1=1250 n_q2=739 n_q3=1870 n_q4=925 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-02-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_050349_TTUQ1b1x1_4094898_ygzwL830/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:31:28.96 +34:51:24.3: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:36:11.58 +31:54:36.4: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:27:20.64 +34:42:16.3: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:36:11.58 +31:54:36.4: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:31:28.96 +34:51:24.3: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:27:20.64 +34:42:16.3: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:11.58 +31:54:36.4: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4430 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:28.96 +34:51:24.3: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3717 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:20.64 +34:42:16.3: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6756 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:14:13.00 +33:26:33.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:23.93 +32:33:21.9: 12.39 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:40:56.86 +28:06:34.8: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:13.00 +33:26:33.8: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:41:51.83 +32:33:14.9: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:48.48 +25:44:57.5: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:20.86 +30:53:55.4: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:05:05.41 +31:40:17.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:23.93 +32:33:21.9: 12.47 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:23.93 +32:33:21.9: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.1686 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:40:56.86 +28:06:34.8: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:56.86 +28:06:34.8: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2065 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:41:51.83 +32:33:14.9: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:05.41 +31:40:17.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:48.48 +25:44:57.5: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:20.86 +30:53:55.4: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:41:51.83 +32:33:14.9: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5468 delta=1.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:48.48 +25:44:57.5: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1378 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:20.86 +30:53:55.4: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5516 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:03:25.11 +31:38:39.8: 10.02 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:05:00.93 +27:45:55.1: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:18:32.96 +28:02:11.7: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:25.11 +31:38:39.8: 10.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:03:25.11 +31:38:39.8: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.1070 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:32.96 +28:02:11.7: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:00.93 +27:45:55.1: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:18:32.96 +28:02:11.7: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1099 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:05:00.93 +27:45:55.1: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6598 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:14:08.33 +32:33:32.7: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:08.33 +32:33:32.7: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:08.33 +32:33:32.7: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3961 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:14:53.74 +29:42:13.0: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:53.74 +29:42:13.0: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:14:53.74 +29:42:13.0: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3365 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:02:38.05 +29:07:04.5: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:15:11.65 +29:02:37.6: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:24:35.40 +33:28:48.3: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:02:38.05 +29:07:04.5: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:02:38.05 +29:07:04.5: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1428 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:15:11.65 +29:02:37.6: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:15:11.65 +29:02:37.6: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9769 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:35.40 +33:28:48.3: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:24:35.40 +33:28:48.3: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0576 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:37:14.32 +31:54:49.1: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:37:14.32 +31:54:49.1: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:37:14.32 +31:54:49.1: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3034 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:54:59.11 +27:44:34.7: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:28:53.06 +31:39:16.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:54:59.11 +27:44:34.7: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:54:59.11 +27:44:34.7: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1752 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:28:53.06 +31:39:16.2: 15.80 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.80 +/- 0.35
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:28:53.06 +31:39:16.2: ref_mag=15.80 +/- 0.35 new_mean_mag=11.9023 delta=3.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:47:47.06 +28:43:50.4: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:47:47.06 +28:43:50.4: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:47:47.06 +28:43:50.4: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1457 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:33.65 +28:48:39.5: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:33.65 +28:48:39.5: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:56:33.65 +28:48:39.5: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8423 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:01:22.17 +28:33:06.0: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:22.17 +28:33:06.0: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:01:22.17 +28:33:06.0: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5610 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:48:40.15 +26:28:29.9: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:58:51.70 +28:08:10.5: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:48:40.15 +26:28:29.9: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:48:40.15 +26:28:29.9: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3701 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:12:12.59 +25:36:23.3: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:51.70 +28:08:10.5: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:58:51.70 +28:08:10.5: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3217 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:12:12.59 +25:36:23.3: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:12:12.59 +25:36:23.3: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2826 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:47:50.68 +30:34:53.4: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:47:50.68 +30:34:53.4: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:47:50.68 +30:34:53.4: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8717 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out242612.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out109928.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out122716.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out123357.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130731.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out132672.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out136086.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out143969.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out145773.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out153246.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out154130.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out168620.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out183260.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242441.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242796.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27755.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65432.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69197.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73056.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94011.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 11s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242159_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242159_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:59.59 +34:57:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242160_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242160_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:35.48 +33:48:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242161_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242161_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:20.58 +32:13:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:13.62 +34:01:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242171_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242171_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242173_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242173_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242179_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242179_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242182_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242182_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.26 +32:30:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242183_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242183_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:14.58 +32:34:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242185_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242185_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.06 +32:31:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242186_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242186_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:07.68 +32:34:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242306_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242306_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.25 +32:03:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242328_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242328_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.47 +34:26:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242361_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242361_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.66 +28:29:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242372_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242372_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:16.40 +32:35:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242377_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242377_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.49 +27:56:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242403_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242403_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:20.52 +35:01:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242441_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 242441_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242450_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242450_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:49.76 +26:44:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242462_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242462_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:02.49 +26:58:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242465_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242465_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.25 +28:37:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242473_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242473_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.25 +30:28:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242484_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242484_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:09.88 +34:55:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242493_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242493_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.66 +34:23:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242505_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242505_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:34.06 +33:00:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242536_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242536_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.56 +27:35:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242538_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242538_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:11.68 +32:30:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242543_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242543_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242557_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242557_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.63 +30:30:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242583_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242583_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242592_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242592_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242604_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242604_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242612_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242612_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.83 +32:33:14.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.375 3448386154848511232 085.46738024886 +32.55393787407 12.1511 10.5635 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.375#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242624_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242624_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:15.16 +34:48:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242646_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242646_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:05.58 +32:31:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242725_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 242725_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:19.37 +31:39:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242796_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 242796_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167626_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 167626_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:59.66 +25:57:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159674_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 159674_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:19.83 +27:36:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117937_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 117937_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:22.34 +29:30:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.68 +31:24:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73056_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 73056_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144103_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 144103_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:41.91 +28:18:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173004_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 173004_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:45.04 +25:51:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55107_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 55107_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:09.13 +32:18:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153246_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 153246_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143969_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 143969_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:32.80 +29:09:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189546_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 189546_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:47.22 +26:45:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09876_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 09876_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:50.42 +34:41:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51841_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 51841_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109928_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 109928_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 209789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:00.66 +25:17:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.07 +28:36:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:56.72 +30:53:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124884_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 124884_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:05.60 +28:56:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123357_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 123357_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122716_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 122716_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27755_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 27755_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41658_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 41658_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:33.47 +33:03:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:38.44 +31:03:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81129_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 81129_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:09.34 +31:08:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.53 +25:40:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14794_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 14794_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:04.03 +34:25:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.21 +27:36:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:14.73 +32:22:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 111257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:50.13 +29:24:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:39.90 +28:00:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24946_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 24946_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.01 +33:54:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 153284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:15.19 +27:47:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.75 +34:35:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34292_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 34292_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:25.13 +33:26:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65432_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 65432_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:47.47 +29:32:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113818_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 113818_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:37.02 +29:27:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:01.60 +30:45:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:40.08 +32:01:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.72 +29:51:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99439_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 99439_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:54.78 +30:13:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154130_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 154130_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198853_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 198853_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:34.75 +27:15:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69197_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 69197_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:11.37 +33:40:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135068_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 135068_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:21.08 +28:36:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 28544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:23.58 +33:45:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132672_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 132672_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157556_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 157556_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:39.59 +27:33:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:48.41 +30:50:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11397_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 11397_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:01.24 +34:37:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.01 +28:29:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71287_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 71287_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:22.89 +31:37:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:30.90 +31:25:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 210727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:43.28 +25:12:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:00.38 +32:13:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130731_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 130731_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:28.47 +27:23:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101740_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 101740_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:39.34 +30:11:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168593_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 168593_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:18.26 +25:36:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91853_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 91853_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:08.84 +30:22:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:12.71 +30:56:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136086_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 136086_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87651_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 87651_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:42.32 +30:33:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169250_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 169250_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:04.55 +25:40:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178641_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 178641_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:52.71 +25:57:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93431_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 93431_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:50.07 +30:19:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 167008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:33.74 +25:26:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44640_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 44640_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:01.98 +32:58:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183260_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 183260_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 145773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:54.24 +27:45:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 109191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:53.00 +29:50:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168620_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 168620_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149793_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 149793_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:59.66 +27:55:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:52.10 +29:02:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:03.22 +32:03:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.90 +25:25:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 66618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:31.63 +31:56:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104428_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 104428_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:46.36 +30:03:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94011_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 94011_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.05 +31:35:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108247_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 108247_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:04.38 +29:55:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 69618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:26.75 +31:46:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.22 +27:29:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92254_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 92254_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:31.14 +30:40:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186660_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 186660_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:49.95 +26:38:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186034_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 186034_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:19.97 +26:31:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39563_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 39563_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:14.29 +33:12:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147892_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 147892_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:04.97 +28:07:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 197704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:05.99 +27:16:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159325_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 159325_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:00.42 +27:34:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152235_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 152235_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:58.38 +27:58:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116475_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 116475_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:22.27 +29:29:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50616_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 50616_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:20.00 +32:41:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175600_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 175600_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:53.09 +26:00:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172442_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 172442_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:44.39 +25:53:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90173_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193
The candidate 90173_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_05-03-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0193 did not pass the final checks
