######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cam-06-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-06-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 763947 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 763947 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits_preview.png'
Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
renamed 'Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits_preview.png'
Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 616.4114
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 635.9258
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2695.0951
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 640.0631
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2690.1625
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 640.4292
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.37223
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 20.7399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-02T04:12:41.3725517' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-02T09:12:41.3725517' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61254.3838121761 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-02T09:12:51.2778523' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61254.3839268172 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 71.9980028736671 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 70.0000390234423 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 33.0075 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 23.9352777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.83155854332109 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.7399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.7399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 78.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.51 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 212.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.900952 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/d_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits :)
Spent 0.494404 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/d_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 19899.553568
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=13115.0, right_median=15628.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 20.7299995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-02T04:13:44.7683893' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-02T09:13:44.7683893' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61254.384545926 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-02T09:13:54.6718247' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61254.3846605439 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 71.9980026934281 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 70.0000390424441 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 33.0975 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 23.9516666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.82717102217398 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.7299995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.7299995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 78.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.51 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 212.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.900952 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/d_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits :)
Spent 0.492321 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/d_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 19899.553568
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=13115.0, right_median=15628.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461254.88392792
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Image size: 928.0'x627.7' 15.5(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:07.593 +70:00:11.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89
Second-epoch image center 04:47:07.593 +70:00:11.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0757 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:27.731 +69:59:52.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89
Second-epoch image center 04:47:27.731 +69:59:52.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0469 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:47:07.593 +70:00:11.67
Second-epoch second image center 04:47:27.731 +69:59:52.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02919 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5iaAGeazgQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rS97et5or8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IAXTtWW43d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oVsEkkXD9T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6909 to 100.4589 deg, Dec +62.8762 to +75.4796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6909 to 100.4589 deg, Dec 62.8762 to 75.4796 deg
Loaded 14362 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7657 out of 8219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8219 out of 14898 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.834600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.834600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6909 to 100.4589 deg, Dec +62.8762 to +75.4796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6909 to 100.4589 deg, Dec 62.8762 to 75.4796 deg
Loaded 14362 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7657 out of 8219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8219 out of 14898 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 14971 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.9862 to 100.4595 deg, Dec +62.8761 to +75.4908 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.9862 to 100.4595 deg, Dec 62.8761 to 75.4908 deg
Loaded 14321 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7671 out of 8229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8229 out of 14971 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.2 mag. Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5iaAGeazgQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1217, bad_region=3282, passed=14898
Got 14898 stars (including 10612 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=1447 n_q2=1010 n_q3=1615 n_q4=837 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.208
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rS97et5or8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1204, bad_region=3285, passed=14971
Got 14971 stars (including 10710 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14971 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5404)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1457 n_q2=1013 n_q3=1611 n_q4=832 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IAXTtWW43d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=386, bad_region=1113, passed=5473
Got 5473 stars (including 4025 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 928.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 928.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012889 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010311 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2115 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1529 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.04"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1463 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 19.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2322 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 19.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 19.08"
Excluding outliers - 1844 stars left (next iteration limit 1609)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1844 robust_rms=25.652 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=31.309 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1844 robust_rms=0.553 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=334.687 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1844 robust_rms=0.596 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=281.269 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 2
SIP_REFIT: order=2 matched=1844 robust_rms_before=34.872 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=8.129 arcsec robust_rms_after=25.652 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=24.165 worst_quadrant_rms_after=31.309
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 24.165 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits N_match=1844 sigma_overall_arcsec=5.083 sigma_q1_arcsec=6.259 sigma_q2_arcsec=26.822 sigma_q3_arcsec=3.148 sigma_q4_arcsec=26.194 n_q1=641 n_q2=123 n_q3=942 n_q4=138 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=5.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oVsEkkXD9T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=375, bad_region=1130, passed=5498
Got 5498 stars (including 4051 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5498 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 3968 stars left (next iteration limit 4365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3968 robust_rms=6.414 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.838 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3968 robust_rms=0.624 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.739 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3968 robust_rms=0.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.507 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3968 robust_rms_before=0.948 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.494 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.540 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.507
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.540 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=3968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.451 n_q1=1174 n_q2=729 n_q3=1338 n_q4=727 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.208
ref2=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.185
new1=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits sigma_overall=5.083 worst_q_ratio=5.277
new2=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.508 worst_q_ratio=1.076
reference average sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.1965
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 1st new image (fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits) flagged: sigma=5.083 (ref avg 0.383), ratio=5.277 (ref avg 1.1965), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5259 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2072453.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2072453.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 25.5638 (1.26541e+11), 5 match, 0 conflict, 12 distractors, 46 index.
RA,Dec = (71.777,70.0016), pixel scale 5.91895 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+-----+--+--++(best)----+--+--------+----+-------------------------------------------------------------
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 6)
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2072453.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2072453.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (71.779331, 70.002396) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:47:07.040, +70:00:08.625).
Field size: 15.5291 x 10.4332 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -15.3357 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits' -> 'fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits'
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Aug 2 04:19 fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Aug 2 04:19 out2072453.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits (fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2072453.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2072453.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.4667 degrees of RA,Dec (71.7816,70.0032)
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100).
log-odds ratio 25.5638 (1.26541e+11), 5 match, 0 conflict, 12 distractors, 46 index.
RA,Dec = (71.777,70.0016), pixel scale 5.91895 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+-----+--+--++(best)----+--+--------+----+-------------------------------------------------------------
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 6)
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2072453.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2072453.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (71.779331, 70.002396) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (04:47:07.040, +70:00:08.625).
Field size: 15.5291 x 10.4332 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -15.3357 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Aug 2 04:19 fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Aug 2 04:19 out2072453.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Image size: 928.0'x627.7' 15.5(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:07.593 +70:00:11.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5473 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2072883.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=386, bad_region=1113, passed=5473
Got 5473 stars (including 4025 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 928.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 928.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012889 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010311 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2115 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1529 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.04"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1463 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 19.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2322 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 19.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 19.08"
Excluding outliers - 1844 stars left (next iteration limit 1609)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1844 robust_rms=25.652 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=31.309 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1844 robust_rms=0.553 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=334.687 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1844 robust_rms=0.596 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=281.269 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 2
SIP_REFIT: order=2 matched=1844 robust_rms_before=34.872 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=8.129 arcsec robust_rms_after=25.652 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=24.165 worst_quadrant_rms_after=31.309
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 24.165 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits N_match=1844 sigma_overall_arcsec=5.083 sigma_q1_arcsec=6.259 sigma_q2_arcsec=26.822 sigma_q3_arcsec=3.148 sigma_q4_arcsec=26.194 n_q1=641 n_q2=123 n_q3=942 n_q4=138 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=5.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 1st new image (fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits): sigma 5.083->5.083, ratio 5.277->5.277; reverting to order 3
WARNING: 1st new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=5.083 -- 13.27x the reference average (0.383); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 1st new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=5.277 -- 4.41x the reference average (1.1965); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257_astrometric_residuals.png (4909 matched stars from wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (4913 matched stars from wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152_astrometric_residuals.png (1844 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 2.21 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (3968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21444_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 21444_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 10.80 | 04:40:16.52 +66:08:11.9 | 4281 0877 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (134.9") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Image size: 928.0'x627.7' 15.5(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:07.593 +70:00:11.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89
Second-epoch image center 04:47:07.593 +70:00:11.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0757 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:27.731 +69:59:52.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89
Second-epoch image center 04:47:27.731 +69:59:52.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0469 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:47:07.593 +70:00:11.67
Second-epoch second image center 04:47:27.731 +69:59:52.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02919 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.evNI6l61YB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fxRDrLOK10
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UcEcd9o5bY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EwQ61CA25h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 107757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6881 to 100.4589 deg, Dec +62.8211 to +75.4976 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6881 to 100.4589 deg, Dec 62.8211 to 75.4976 deg
Loaded 14469 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6735 out of 8427 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8427 out of 107757 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.687900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.687900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 107757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6881 to 100.4589 deg, Dec +62.8211 to +75.4976 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6881 to 100.4589 deg, Dec 62.8211 to 75.4976 deg
Loaded 14469 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6735 out of 8427 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8427 out of 107757 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 108260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6873 to 100.6251 deg, Dec +62.8267 to +75.5092 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6873 to 100.6251 deg, Dec 62.8267 to 75.5092 deg
Loaded 14512 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6694 out of 8433 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8433 out of 108260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 48 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.evNI6l61YB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=43, blended=8978, bad_region=18142, passed=107714
Got 107714 stars (including 81712 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 107714 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=1460 n_q2=988 n_q3=1623 n_q4=852 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fxRDrLOK10 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=8926, bad_region=18368, passed=108235
Got 108235 stars (including 82087 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 108235 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=1447 n_q2=1002 n_q3=1616 n_q4=856 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UcEcd9o5bY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1808, bad_region=6118, passed=43877
Got 43877 stars (including 36189 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43877 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 928.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 928.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012889 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010311 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2532 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 19.96"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2781 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2243 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 19.99"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2215 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38464 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 20.18"
Excluding outliers - 2215 stars left (next iteration limit 1883)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits N_match=2215 sigma_overall_arcsec=5.501 sigma_q1_arcsec=7.222 sigma_q2_arcsec=31.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=3.070 sigma_q4_arcsec=25.717 n_q1=766 n_q2=172 n_q3=1084 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=5.711
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EwQ61CA25h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1865, bad_region=6131, passed=44052
Got 44052 stars (including 36298 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44052 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.429 n_q1=1471 n_q2=945 n_q3=1535 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-12-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125848_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 125848_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.83 | 05:43:19.66 +72:44:50.3 | 7334 5078 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (424.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125853_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 125853_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.47 | 04:22:39.04 +68:29:30.0 | 3393 2394 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125856_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 125856_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.55 | 04:23:29.11 +67:16:14.8 | 3344 1654 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (91.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125859_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 125859_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.40 | 04:25:59.10 +70:23:17.0 | 3711 3510 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125863_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 125863_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.68 | 03:59:10.06 +73:23:51.5 | 2778 5524 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
**** FOUND 03:59:10.05 +73:23:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125864_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 125864_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.34 | 04:53:42.46 +67:33:39.3 | 5106 1716 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (194.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125865_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 125865_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.07 | 05:23:19.14 +66:16:48.9 | 6907 1038 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (435.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125866_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 125866_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.21 | 04:56:13.37 +70:33:10.4 | 5239 3525 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (166.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125867_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 125867_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.99 | 04:22:16.30 +68:38:27.6 | 3384 2486 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125868_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 125868_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.04 | 04:21:32.36 +66:31:28.6 | 3170 1220 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (111.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125870_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 125870_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.95 | 04:44:54.98 +67:53:51.6 | 4608 1931 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (162.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125871_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 125871_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.75 | 04:25:43.56 +68:24:44.7 | 3556 2325 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (73.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125872_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 125872_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.79 | 04:39:22.93 +71:51:57.6 | 4443 4341 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (80.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125873_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 125873_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.65 | 05:03:54.26 +68:19:37.2 | 5677 2190 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (251.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125874_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 125874_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.65 | 05:02:20.42 +72:25:34.1 | 5511 4664 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126634_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 126634_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 10.98 | 04:40:17.05 +66:08:07.5 | 4282 0876 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (140.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127523_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 127523_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 11.82 | 04:40:19.84 +66:10:22.4 | 4286 0899 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (134.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128476_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 128476_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.35 | 04:54:16.94 +73:02:38.0 | 5143 5032 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (151.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128843_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 128843_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.57 | 04:54:02.61 +68:12:14.3 | 5127 2106 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (173.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128983_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 128983_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.60 | 05:03:07.82 +66:49:10.1 | 5666 1275 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (280.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129130_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 129130_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.73 | 04:53:50.81 +66:22:13.2 | 5113 0994 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (231.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129317_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 129317_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.74 | 04:50:06.16 +66:30:50.4 | 4887 1084 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (202.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129379_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 129379_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.87 | 04:42:14.45 +69:04:10.9 | 4491 2646 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129501_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 129501_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.82 | 04:13:40.68 +72:09:23.4 | 3270 4655 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
**** FOUND 04:13:40.91 +72:09:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129905_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 129905_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.84 | 04:51:33.03 +68:11:47.6 | 4987 2102 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (164.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129972_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 129972_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.83 | 04:48:07.62 +67:46:24.7 | 4788 1850 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (170.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129984_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 129984_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.69 | 04:51:34.21 +68:12:04.4 | 4988 2105 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (163.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130166_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 130166_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.95 | 04:29:30.94 +69:21:51.6 | 3825 2875 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (51.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130482_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 130482_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.07 | 04:54:09.56 +66:19:03.1 | 5132 0962 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (232.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130537_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 130537_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.97 | 04:02:58.04 +72:49:32.5 | 2866 5148 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
**** FOUND 04:02:58.13 +72:49:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130581_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 130581_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.08 | 05:13:53.90 +67:29:16.8 | 6275 1715 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (326.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130647_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 130647_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 12.97 | 04:48:32.12 +67:45:37.9 | 4811 1841 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (168.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131189_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 131189_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.33 | 05:20:28.70 +71:45:07.7 | 6380 4317 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (278.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131358_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 131358_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.17 | 04:57:37.98 +70:38:35.4 | 5309 3581 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (180.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131388_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 131388_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.23 | 05:42:25.65 +71:17:33.1 | 7466 4203 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (447.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131463_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 131463_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.48 | 04:25:45.43 +67:00:45.0 | 3458 1483 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (114.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131515_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 131515_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.47 | 05:02:40.34 +66:48:09.6 | 5639 1264 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (279.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131654_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 131654_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.28 | 05:42:45.44 +71:17:38.1 | 7482 4207 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (445.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131776_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 131776_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.29 | 05:34:29.88 +71:07:21.1 | 7102 4032 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (396.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132050_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 132050_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.38 | 04:12:06.08 +68:58:37.9 | 2865 2772 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
**** FOUND 04:12:06.19 +68:58:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132089_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 132089_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.41 | 05:08:29.89 +69:54:55.6 | 5878 3161 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (244.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132160_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 132160_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.23 | 03:57:47.88 +72:59:12.4 | 2663 5295 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
**** FOUND 03:57:47.67 +72:59:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132591_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 132591_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.53 | 04:47:22.18 +70:17:07.1 | 4789 3369 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (113.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132619_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 132619_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.30 | 05:14:25.64 +69:50:42.8 | 6189 3140 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (248.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132695_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 132695_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.52 | 05:42:48.45 +71:16:33.1 | 7487 4197 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (447.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132729_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 132729_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.54 | 05:19:26.56 +67:59:47.3 | 6564 2050 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (378.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133837_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 133837_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.86 | 04:57:02.36 +71:52:52.0 | 5272 4329 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (145.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99082_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153
The candidate 99082_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 02.38466 | 2461254.88466 | 13.15 | 05:17:39.20 +66:55:43.0 | 6524 1395 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_041514_TTUQ2b1x1_2028178_jPwPYWOF/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-02_04-13-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (373.5") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Cam-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461254.88392792 -observatory V36
07:26:54.93 +20:07:06.1 Mercury (0.2mag)
11:41:51.15 +01:48:40.7 Venus (-4.3mag)
05:32:13.48 +23:23:36.2 Mars (1.3mag)
08:37:39.86 +19:00:36.3 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:43.62 +03:19:01.4 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:11:00.46 +20:55:04.5 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:24.57 +00:15:26.5 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:28:42.26 -23:27:52.7 Pluto (14.4mag)
23:33:04.88 -01:08:52.4 Moon (-11.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 2 04:17 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461254.88392792:
08:37:46.60 +19:00:09.3 Io (6.0mag)
08:37:41.27 +19:00:30.6 Europa (6.3mag)
08:37:49.31 +18:59:54.3 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:37:16.29 +19:02:13.1 Callisto (6.7mag)
08:35:20.83 +18:56:29.3 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:37:41.73 +19:00:28.9 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:34:48.93 +18:56:10.3 Elara (17.7mag)
08:41:43.19 +18:42:52.2 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:41:13.67 +19:09:38.9 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:55.40 +03:18:57.3 Titan (8.4mag)
00:56:38.68 +03:18:53.5 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:36.19 +03:16:48.9 Iapetus (11.2mag)
00:56:45.63 +03:19:28.0 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:56:13.65 +03:12:59.0 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 2 04:17 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461254.88392792:
18:40:57.02 -25:46:00.4 JWST
08:49:14.79 +06:54:40.7 Chandra
10:49:21.48 -59:03:06.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 2 04:17 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461254.88392792 -observatory V36
03:06:50.14 +16:51:56.9 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:03:49.52 -34:39:05.2 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:48:17.30 -68:41:47.6 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:08:12.56 +32:52:22.5 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:25:34.66 +34:41:06.7 16.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:43:21.76 +31:45:42.8 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:37:33.72 +26:38:17.9 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:16:10.90 +28:44:01.7 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:24:56.69 +05:16:41.6 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:11:39.55 -12:03:57.8 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:18:38.22 +66:35:50.2 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:54:14.65 -12:23:06.3 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:01:24.95 +31:05:02.5 15.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:08:05.06 +15:37:11.3 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:10:40.64 +42:40:09.3 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:19:10.89 +48:47:02.0 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:10:20.48 -13:03:24.7 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:52:17.74 +25:10:32.3 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:28:09.29 -15:21:50.8 17.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:24:54.62 +21:15:47.2 17.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:54:46.32 +02:43:33.3 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:06:09.85 +78:20:27.4 16.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:04:53.95 +46:03:11.8 17.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:42:03.90 +07:53:45.5 17.2mag A/2026 E1
21:51:33.30 -24:46:30.7 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:25:31.61 -03:02:56.4 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:31:51.74 +31:54:02.2 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:55:45.31 +06:33:13.6 17.2mag 63P/Wild
00:54:13.62 -05:15:45.0 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
05:22:09.59 +20:45:31.9 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:43:14.64 -22:50:03.3 17.9mag 84P/Giclas
02:54:31.74 +13:13:13.7 16.6mag 88P/Howell
07:40:41.33 +28:24:58.3 16.1mag 93P/Lovas
03:50:10.53 +14:37:04.9 17.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
05:37:06.50 +30:50:09.5 16.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:04:34.60 +27:36:25.8 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:32:09.38 -08:00:28.0 17.0mag 124P/Mrkos
05:27:49.66 +21:11:00.8 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:18:23.36 +19:09:42.3 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:04:04.45 +03:25:47.1 17.7mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:22:11.70 -19:54:24.1 14.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
06:55:46.16 +37:24:27.5 15.7mag 162P/SidingSpring
16:47:23.65 +35:34:48.1 12.6mag 169P/NEAT
02:31:52.59 +09:21:38.0 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:38:55.11 -09:40:27.2 17.6mag 235P/LINEAR
20:26:32.97 -52:45:51.8 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
03:05:05.82 +22:39:08.4 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
06:47:39.46 +37:47:07.6 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:08:48.36 +03:46:30.6 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski
08:55:32.99 +18:39:31.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
08:27:03.68 +37:14:50.9 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 2 04:17 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 2 04:17 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug 2 04:17 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
15:03:06.585 -41:50:04.94 AT 2026ukd 2026-07-13.11 21.0157
15:03:27.973 -36:42:42.32 AT 2026ukc 2026-07-13.05 23.6461
15:02:56.999 -38:51:26.99 AT 2026ukb 2026-07-13.05 22.6064
15:12:28.229 -39:29:06.59 AT 2026uka 2026-07-13.05 22.5249
15:14:29.806 -37:56:29.34 AT 2026ujz 2026-07-13.11 22.8138
15:09:04.041 -40:04:33.51 AT 2026ujy 2026-07-13.08 22.9867
14:58:25.858 -38:50:41.25 AT 2026ujx 2026-07-13.07 22.9019
15:04:25.271 -38:31:40.80 AT 2026ujw 2026-07-13.08 23.4978
15:07:20.511 -41:12:40.97 AT 2026ujv 2026-07-13.11 23.0776
14:49:39.777 -37:18:54.58 AT 2026uju 2026-07-13.07 22.934
14:54:26.835 -38:14:29.04 AT 2026ujt 2026-07-13.07 23.0941
14:55:38.655 -37:32:07.47 AT 2026ujs 2026-07-13.05 23.3435
15:03:41.887 -37:23:29.20 AT 2026ujr 2026-07-13.08 22.969
14:52:12.207 -37:26:01.08 AT 2026ujq 2026-07-13.05 23.2506
15:09:01.651 -38:50:30.89 AT 2026ujp 2026-07-13.05 23.1149
14:58:09.953 -41:22:45.09 AT 2026ujo 2026-07-13.05 21.9758
14:56:47.595 -41:35:10.45 AT 2026ujn 2026-07-13.05 20.3612
15:10:46.542 -37:24:26.89 AT 2026ujm 2026-07-13.05 22.857
15:01:15.315 -37:02:21.14 AT 2026ujl 2026-07-13.05 21.6824
14:52:23.223 -40:42:27.52 AT 2026ujk 2026-07-13.07 23.0058
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Aug 2 04:17 tns_transients_list.txt