This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.3132 2461254.8132 10.96 20:39:12.13 -14:09:29.7
31.78050 -30.16657 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.287 Nephthys 0 0 0 10.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:39:12.13 -14:09:29.7: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:39:12.13 -14:09:29.7: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461254.8132,10.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260802.3132 10.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.3132 2461254.8132 10.22 20:22:13.33 -07:21:03.5
36.72242 -23.51035 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 10.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" XZ Aql
Type: EA/SD+DSC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.090 V 11.610 V 2452501.08810 2.139207000000 A2
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:22:13.33 -07:21:03.5: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:22:13.33 -07:21:03.5: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
XZ Aql,2461254.8132,10.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
XZ Aql 20260802.3132 10.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.3132 2461254.8132 12.90 20:55:44.80 -06:58:49.2
41.32771 -30.75813 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 10.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.490 Veritas -0 -1 1 12.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:44.80 -06:58:49.2: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:44.80 -06:58:49.2: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461254.8132,12.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260802.3132 12.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.3132 2461254.8132 13.03 20:22:12.17 -10:42:11.1
33.40935 -24.96334 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 10.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1058 Grubba -1 -1 2 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:22:12.17 -10:42:11.1: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:22:12.17 -10:42:11.1: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.3132* 20 22 12.17 -10 42 11.1 13.0 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461254.8132,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260802.3132 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.3132 2461254.8132 13.75 20:22:45.99 -08:15:40.0
35.89577 -24.03401 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.872 Holda -0 0 0 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:22:45.99 -08:15:40.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:22:45.99 -08:15:40.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461254.8132,13.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260802.3132 13.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461254.81357079 02.08.2026 07:31:22.516 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13572
Objects passed selection criteria: 13498
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9722.75
Average stars matched: 9497.25 (97.6807 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239224 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 02:42:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461254.81357079 02.08.2026 07:31:22.516 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 69
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 50 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 87479
Objects passed selection criteria: 87345
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 71137.2
Average stars matched: 68973.8 (96.9587 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 574872 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 02:43:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461254.81289819
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:15.002 -10:01:25.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:15.002 -10:01:25.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0477 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:18.137 -10:02:05.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:18.137 -10:02:05.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0590 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:15.002 -10:01:25.44
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:18.137 -10:02:05.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01695 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.htZRU16aPX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DYC7pKgjKT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XFgUg6WsQb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ksrmwPCDWT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.734000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.734000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7839 out of 8130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8130 out of 14495 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.0 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.htZRU16aPX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=755, bad_region=0, passed=14476
Got 14476 stars (including 13702 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.220 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1163 n_q2=1365 n_q3=1107 n_q4=1240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DYC7pKgjKT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=763, bad_region=0, passed=14495
Got 14495 stars (including 13716 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1171 n_q2=1357 n_q3=1105 n_q4=1241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XFgUg6WsQb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=407, bad_region=0, passed=5086
Got 5086 stars (including 4673 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5086 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4580 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4554 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4554 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4580 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4555 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4555 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4555 stars left (next iteration limit 5009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4555 robust_rms=11.418 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.971 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4555 robust_rms=0.454 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.482 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4555 robust_rms=0.326 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.340 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4555 robust_rms_before=0.814 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.326 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.360 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.340
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.360 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits N_match=4555 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1058 n_q2=1248 n_q3=1057 n_q4=1192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ksrmwPCDWT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=398, bad_region=0, passed=5075
Got 5075 stars (including 4672 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5075 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4578 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4550 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4550 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4550 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4577 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4551 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4551 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4551 stars left (next iteration limit 5005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4551 robust_rms=11.251 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.541 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4551 robust_rms=0.420 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.451 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4551 robust_rms=0.309 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.334 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4551 robust_rms_before=0.786 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.312 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.309 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.334 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.334
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.334 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits N_match=4551 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1068 n_q2=1242 n_q3=1048 n_q4=1193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.081
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.134
ref2=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.141
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits sigma_overall=0.330 worst_q_ratio=1.126
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.081
reference average sigma_overall=0.281 worst_q_ratio=1.1375
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044_astrometric_residuals.png (4555 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045_astrometric_residuals.png (4551 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.90 -07:47:31.7: 10.19 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:39:12.13 -14:09:29.7: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:22:13.33 -07:21:03.5: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:39:12.13 -14:09:29.7: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.90 -07:47:31.7: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.19 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.90 -07:47:31.7: ref_mag=10.19 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4374 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:22:13.33 -07:21:03.5: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:22:13.33 -07:21:03.5: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.2188 delta=1.42 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04121.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20886.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20866_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 20866_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20886_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 20886_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:22:13.33 -07:21:03.5
20:39:12.13 -14:09:29.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:15.002 -10:01:25.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:15.002 -10:01:25.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0477 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:18.137 -10:02:05.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:18.137 -10:02:05.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0590 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:15.002 -10:01:25.44
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:18.137 -10:02:05.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01695 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zD7qrtfcUz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rUcksLVnl6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TMPXbg2Ov8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2m2Jjhafzw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.648000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.648000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 95800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Loaded 10308 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7289 out of 8389 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8389 out of 95800 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 65 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.1 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zD7qrtfcUz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=6181, bad_region=13, passed=95412
Got 95412 stars (including 89061 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95412 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=1203 n_q2=1306 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rUcksLVnl6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=6280, bad_region=13, passed=95780
Got 95780 stars (including 89335 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95780 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.226 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=1213 n_q2=1293 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TMPXbg2Ov8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1641, bad_region=2, passed=47789
Got 47789 stars (including 46068 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47789 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=1212 n_q2=1355 n_q3=1115 n_q4=1193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.122
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2m2Jjhafzw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1624, bad_region=1, passed=47387
Got 47387 stars (including 45670 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47387 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5358)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1206 n_q2=1362 n_q3=1109 n_q4=1194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-30-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_023343_TTUQ1b1x1_2238173_DWLoI2h4/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:30:48.96 -08:16:32.6: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:22:29.11 -04:44:12.6: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:30:53.31 -09:13:23.4: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:26:53.38 -12:07:52.6: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:38.38 -10:37:16.4: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:50:25.11 -06:04:11.3: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:24:12.98 -12:49:27.4: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:00.37 -09:23:40.9: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:24:08.20 -07:18:05.0: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:20:26.24 -13:30:08.4: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:26:53.38 -12:07:52.6: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:24:08.20 -07:18:05.0: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:38.38 -10:37:16.4: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:30:48.96 -08:16:32.6: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:50:25.11 -06:04:11.3: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:30:53.31 -09:13:23.4: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:24:12.98 -12:49:27.4: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:20:26.24 -13:30:08.4: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:53.38 -12:07:52.6: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2300 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:08.20 -07:18:05.0: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4630 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:48.96 -08:16:32.6: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3241 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:38.38 -10:37:16.4: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0320 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:25.11 -06:04:11.3: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4017 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:53.31 -09:13:23.4: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9160 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:12.98 -12:49:27.4: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3754 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:26.24 -13:30:08.4: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3173 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:22:29.11 -04:44:12.6: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:00.37 -09:23:40.9: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:00.37 -09:23:40.9: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6548 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:29.11 -04:44:12.6: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6117 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:59:45.48 -07:16:27.5: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:14:20.03 -14:23:09.4: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:15:22.93 -07:49:48.3: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:40:12.54 -08:35:29.7: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:15.73 -06:46:47.1: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:32:18.47 -08:52:23.6: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:15:19.92 -12:37:10.0: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:44:30.37 -08:15:54.7: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:19:28.37 -13:13:43.4: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:59:45.48 -07:16:27.5: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:45.48 -07:16:27.5: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0916 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:14:20.03 -14:23:09.4: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:15.73 -06:46:47.1: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:32:18.47 -08:52:23.6: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:40:12.54 -08:35:29.7: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:20.03 -14:23:09.4: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9312 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:15:22.93 -07:49:48.3: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:15.73 -06:46:47.1: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1359 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:18.47 -08:52:23.6: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1299 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:12.54 -08:35:29.7: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2872 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:22.93 -07:49:48.3: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9838 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:44:30.37 -08:15:54.7: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:15:19.92 -12:37:10.0: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:30.37 -08:15:54.7: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8086 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:19.92 -12:37:10.0: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7989 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:14:27.22 -10:00:52.1: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:19:28.37 -13:13:43.4: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:28.37 -13:13:43.4: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7636 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:14:27.22 -10:00:52.1: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:27.22 -10:00:52.1: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8323 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:24:07.43 -05:18:44.4: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:11:41.69 -10:58:41.7: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:24:27.95 -10:13:27.6: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:36:17.54 -14:34:14.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:20:45.96 -07:45:58.7: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:51:44.19 -08:13:09.2: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:20:22.26 -09:58:09.7: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:20.73 -08:10:12.4: 11.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:02:20.79 -09:40:08.1: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:11:41.69 -10:58:41.7: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:41.69 -10:58:41.7: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2242 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:24:07.43 -05:18:44.4: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:24:27.95 -10:13:27.6: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:36:17.54 -14:34:14.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:07.43 -05:18:44.4: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5003 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:20:45.96 -07:45:58.7: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:27.95 -10:13:27.6: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5092 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:17.54 -14:34:14.0: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2943 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:45.96 -07:45:58.7: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9758 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:51:44.19 -08:13:09.2: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:20:22.26 -09:58:09.7: 11.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:44.19 -08:13:09.2: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8930 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:22.26 -09:58:09.7: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7229 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.89 -07:47:31.8: 10.42 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:20.73 -08:10:12.4: 11.10 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.09 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:20.73 -08:10:12.4: ref_mag=11.09 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4781 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:02:20.79 -09:40:08.1: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.19 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:20.79 -09:40:08.1: ref_mag=10.19 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5416 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.89 -07:47:31.8: 10.36 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.89 -07:47:31.8: ref_mag=10.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5385 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:36:45.31 -10:36:12.0: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:37:32.62 -06:45:54.0: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:45:25.55 -15:02:54.0: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:47.46 -07:14:29.2: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:53.54 -05:39:35.7: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:25:44.26 -07:51:40.9: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:36:45.31 -10:36:12.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:45.31 -10:36:12.0: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3213 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:37:32.62 -06:45:54.0: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:47.46 -07:14:29.2: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:45:25.55 -15:02:54.0: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:32.62 -06:45:54.0: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3867 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:47.46 -07:14:29.2: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5396 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:25.55 -15:02:54.0: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3341 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:02:28.68 -15:24:45.2: 12.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:44.80 -06:58:49.2: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:22:12.17 -10:42:11.1: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:53.54 -05:39:35.7: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:53.54 -05:39:35.7: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4893 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:25:44.26 -07:51:40.9: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:44.26 -07:51:40.9: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4883 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:14:59.47 -04:36:11.3: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:02:28.68 -15:24:45.2: 12.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:44.80 -06:58:49.2: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:28.68 -15:24:45.2: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9094 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:22:12.17 -10:42:11.1: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:17:58.95 -10:36:17.9: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:15:20.43 -05:31:12.1: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:13:38.73 -06:56:06.9: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:14:59.47 -04:36:11.3: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:50.66 -07:13:52.9: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:59.47 -04:36:11.3: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0888 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:28.07 -12:56:38.0: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:31.28 -05:49:53.5: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:17:58.95 -10:36:17.9: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:58.95 -10:36:17.9: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2683 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:13:38.73 -06:56:06.9: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:15:20.43 -05:31:12.1: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:38.73 -06:56:06.9: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2751 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:20.43 -05:31:12.1: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2918 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:28.07 -12:56:38.0: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:44:57.90 -11:00:50.4: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:31.28 -05:49:53.5: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:28.07 -12:56:38.0: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4011 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:50.66 -07:13:52.9: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:31.28 -05:49:53.5: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4079 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:50.66 -07:13:52.9: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4887 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:03.09 -08:11:45.7: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:44:57.90 -11:00:50.4: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:57.90 -11:00:50.4: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4059 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:20:13.53 -09:12:09.9: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:22:45.99 -08:15:40.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:17:52.56 -04:41:08.5: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:33:11.03 -10:41:32.8: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:03.09 -08:11:45.7: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:03.09 -08:11:45.7: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4886 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:20:13.53 -09:12:09.9: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:22:45.99 -08:15:40.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:13.53 -09:12:09.9: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6146 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:17:52.56 -04:41:08.5: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:52.56 -04:41:08.5: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4686 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:33:11.03 -10:41:32.8: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:11.03 -10:41:32.8: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0115 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113785.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113795.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113901.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113584_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113584_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113591_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113591_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113602_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113602_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113606_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113606_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113611_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113611_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113620_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113620_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113622_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113622_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113623_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113623_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113626_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113626_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113628_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113628_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113631_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113631_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:30.57 -09:43:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113638_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113638_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113639_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113639_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113640_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113640_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113641_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113641_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113642_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113642_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113645_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113645_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:50.98 -08:29:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113646_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113646_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113648_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113648_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113649_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113649_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:46.28 -11:16:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113652_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113652_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113654_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113654_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113655_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113655_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:07.17 -13:23:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113659_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113659_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113662_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113662_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113665_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113665_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113666_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113666_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113667_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113667_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113668_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113668_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113669_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113669_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113670_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113670_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113671_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113671_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113672_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113672_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113692_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113692_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:12.13 -14:09:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113711_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113711_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:40.63 -08:56:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113731_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113731_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113734_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113734_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:03.66 -12:35:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113738_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113738_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113740_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113740_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113745_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113745_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113748_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113748_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113749_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113749_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113767_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113767_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:09.58 -12:35:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113775_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113775_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:06.04 -12:35:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113776_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113776_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:19.93 -12:37:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113779_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113779_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113785_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 113785_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113795_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 113795_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113805_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113805_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:39.17 -07:01:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113816_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113816_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113822_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113822_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:47.46 -09:28:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113826_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113826_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113836_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113836_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113853_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113853_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113856_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113856_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113863_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113863_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113869_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113869_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113873_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113873_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113884_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113884_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113889_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113889_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113898_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113898_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113901_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 113901_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113912_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 113912_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_02-31-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
