This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 31.2491 2461252.7491 9.19 20:35:01.18 -27:03:34.8
17.07658 -33.61240 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.324 Bamberga 2 1 2 9.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:35:01.18 -27:03:34.8: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:35:01.18 -27:03:34.8: 14.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 31.2491* 20 35 01.18 -27 03 34.8 9.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461252.7491,9.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260731.2491 9.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 31.2491 2461252.7491 9.29 19:41:00.35 -28:55:27.3
10.96599 -22.81171 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASAS J194100-2855.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.790 V Y 0.480 V 2452329.70000 110.837440000000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:00.35 -28:55:27.3: 10.10 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:41:00.35 -28:55:27.3: 10.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.20 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J194100-2855.5,2461252.7491,9.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J194100-2855.5 20260731.2491 9.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461252.74936271 31.07.2026 05:58:54.938 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6694
Objects passed selection criteria: 6687
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5183.5
Average stars matched: 5105.5 (98.4952 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233188 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 31 01:04:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461252.74936271 31.07.2026 05:58:54.938 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 34
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 52330
Objects passed selection criteria: 52200
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 38941
Average stars matched: 37847.2 (97.1913 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 275084 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 31 01:05:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461252.74882685
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:28.249 -26:01:09.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:28.249 -26:01:09.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0465 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Image size: 940.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:30.534 -26:00:46.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:30.534 -26:00:46.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0359 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:28.249 -26:01:09.75
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:30.534 -26:00:46.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01074 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YDSlSp49Ld
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lx39Qt3wAR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I8Fy8Mr1OY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tbPfUNz54g
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.601900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.601900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6769 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4446 deg, Dec -31.2472 to -20.5564 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4446 deg, Dec -31.2472 to -20.5564 deg
Loaded 9425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5485 out of 5600 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5600 out of 6769 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
4.1 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
4.0 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.2 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YDSlSp49Ld (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=461, bad_region=0, passed=7487
Got 7487 stars (including 7021 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.524 n_q1=1332 n_q2=1016 n_q3=1356 n_q4=1195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Lx39Qt3wAR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=427, bad_region=0, passed=6769
Got 6769 stars (including 6336 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6769 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.430 n_q1=1291 n_q2=1088 n_q3=1284 n_q4=1242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.I8Fy8Mr1OY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=232, bad_region=0, passed=3296
Got 3296 stars (including 3063 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3004 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2990 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2990 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3004 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2992 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2992 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 2992 stars left (next iteration limit 3289)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2992 robust_rms=11.630 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.621 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2992 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.591 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2992 robust_rms=0.400 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.531 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2992 robust_rms_before=0.971 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.437 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.400 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.608 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.531
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:28.268 -26:01:10.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3296 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky795818.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.971 -> 0.400 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits N_match=2992 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=674 n_q2=569 n_q3=941 n_q4=808 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.298
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tbPfUNz54g (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=225, bad_region=0, passed=3299
Got 3299 stars (including 3073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3299 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013063 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010450 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3011 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2995 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2995 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3012 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2999 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2999 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 2999 stars left (next iteration limit 3294)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2999 robust_rms=11.490 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.280 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2999 robust_rms=0.456 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.569 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2999 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.521 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2999 robust_rms_before=0.955 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.438 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.393 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.602 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.521
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:30.550 -26:00:47.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3299 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky795823.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.955 -> 0.393 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits N_match=2999 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=668 n_q2=577 n_q3=944 n_q4=810 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits sigma_overall=0.457 worst_q_ratio=1.150
ref2=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits sigma_overall=0.413 worst_q_ratio=1.105
new1=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits sigma_overall=0.401 worst_q_ratio=1.298
new2=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits sigma_overall=0.410 worst_q_ratio=1.303
reference average sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.1275
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201_astrometric_residuals.png (4905 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108_astrometric_residuals.png (2992 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109_astrometric_residuals.png (2999 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:35:01.18 -27:03:34.8: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:30:50.57 -31:07:51.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:06:48.08 -27:12:42.8: 10.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:35:01.18 -27:03:34.8: 14.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:06:48.08 -27:12:42.8: 10.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:30:50.57 -31:07:51.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:50.57 -31:07:51.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:48.08 -27:12:42.8: ref_mag=10.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.3046 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20191.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20191_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 20191_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20205_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 20205_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:04.29 -28:31:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20246_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 20246_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20285_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 20285_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20286_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 20286_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:58.05 -22:58:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:35:01.18 -27:03:34.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:28.249 -26:01:09.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:28.249 -26:01:09.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0465 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Image size: 940.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:30.534 -26:00:46.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:30.534 -26:00:46.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0359 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:28.249 -26:01:09.75
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:30.534 -26:00:46.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01074 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IqDYSleeM6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CAG5kpYh9k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3BxFTCIBdK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EDQSbvoChd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 59775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Loaded 9495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7512 out of 8123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8123 out of 59775 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.442600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.442600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 59775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Loaded 9495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7512 out of 8123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8123 out of 59775 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 55659 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3218 to 311.4446 deg, Dec -31.2543 to -20.5313 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3218 to 311.4446 deg, Dec -31.2543 to -20.5313 deg
Loaded 9473 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7582 out of 8132 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8132 out of 55659 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 31 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 12.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.IqDYSleeM6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2722, bad_region=2, passed=59768
Got 59768 stars (including 56968 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.535 n_q1=1373 n_q2=1013 n_q3=1326 n_q4=1199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CAG5kpYh9k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2376, bad_region=0, passed=55644
Got 55644 stars (including 53197 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.436 n_q1=1322 n_q2=1097 n_q3=1228 n_q4=1262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3BxFTCIBdK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=761, bad_region=0, passed=20857
Got 20857 stars (including 20076 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20857 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.665 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=1157 n_q2=978 n_q3=1512 n_q4=1257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.408
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EDQSbvoChd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=769, bad_region=0, passed=20834
Got 20834 stars (including 20043 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20834 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013063 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010450 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.687 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=1158 n_q2=967 n_q3=1516 n_q4=1260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.409
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-31_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_010144_TTUQ1b1x1_729325_u8R1thU1/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:23.28 -22:18:41.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:00:08.39 -20:55:20.0: 12.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:02:28.75 -27:42:16.3: 10.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:30:50.53 -31:07:51.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:06:47.68 -27:12:40.1: 10.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:44:45.22 -23:15:46.6: 11.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:38.95 -21:56:14.3: 12.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:00:08.39 -20:55:20.0: 12.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:02:28.75 -27:42:16.3: 10.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:06:47.68 -27:12:40.1: 10.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:43:23.28 -22:18:41.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:23.28 -22:18:41.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:08.39 -20:55:20.0: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5875 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:28.75 -27:42:16.3: ref_mag=10.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7297 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:47.68 -27:12:40.1: ref_mag=10.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.3279 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:30:50.53 -31:07:51.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:50.53 -31:07:51.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:44:45.22 -23:15:46.6: 11.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:45.22 -23:15:46.6: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1484 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:43:38.95 -21:56:14.3: 12.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:38.95 -21:56:14.3: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3588 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:14.48 -29:03:17.1: 12.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:43:14.48 -29:03:17.1: 11.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:14.48 -29:03:17.1: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7713 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:00.35 -28:55:27.3: 10.10 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:41:00.35 -28:55:27.3: 10.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:41:00.35 -28:55:27.3: ref_mag=10.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.2949 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08820.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73342_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 73342_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73351_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 73351_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73366_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 73366_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:35:01.22 -27:03:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73436_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 73436_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73461_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 73461_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:58.04 -22:58:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73470_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 73470_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73477_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 73477_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73522_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 73522_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:01.49 -23:10:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73603_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 73603_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:37:22.47 -30:10:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73645_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 73645_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:55.38 -23:25:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73766_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 73766_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73826_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 73826_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73848_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 73848_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:38.20 -27:10:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73866_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 73866_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:46.97 -22:34:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73899_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 73899_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:28.97 -30:48:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14951_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 14951_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:57.75 -27:55:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71065_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 71065_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:17.02 -27:05:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18227_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 18227_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:40.40 -27:15:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07963_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 07963_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70080_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 70080_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:09.11 -28:46:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69974_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 69974_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:44.46 -29:54:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50115_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 50115_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:31.15 -22:06:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32137_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 32137_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:57.54 -24:53:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42909_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 42909_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:06.74 -23:30:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11495_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 11495_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:04.30 -28:31:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21222_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 21222_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:33.29 -26:40:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25680_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 25680_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:02.90 -25:51:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43287_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 43287_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:33:10.40 -23:40:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31663_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 31663_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:25.83 -25:06:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08820_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 08820_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38304_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 38304_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-31_00-58-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks