This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 31.1774 2461252.6774 9.39 18:52:27.42 -23:21:35.6
12.00662 -10.62808 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.8 Flora 1 0 1 9.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:52:27.42 -23:21:35.6: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:52:27.42 -23:21:35.6: 14.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461252.6774,9.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260731.1774 9.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 31.1774 2461252.6774 11.78 18:59:11.05 -30:50:58.3
5.61699 -15.04881 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia 1 -1 1 11.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:11.05 -30:50:58.3: 15.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:11.05 -30:50:58.3: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461252.6774,11.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260731.1774 11.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 31.1774 2461252.6774 12.70 18:42:03.68 -23:58:23.3
10.40589 -8.74332 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne -1 -1 1 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:03.68 -23:58:23.3: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:42:03.68 -23:58:23.3: 14.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461252.6774,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260731.1774 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 31.1774 2461252.6774 12.55 18:37:13.43 -29:54:33.2
4.50703 -10.34357 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" ASASSN-V J183712.90-295434.8
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.240 V 15.060 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:37:13.43 -29:54:33.2: 14.63 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:37:13.43 -29:54:33.2: 14.05 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.21
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J183712.90-295434.8,2461252.6774,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J183712.90-295434.8 20260731.1774 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 31.1774 2461252.6774 13.16 19:25:45.08 -22:31:17.5
16.00024 -17.29453 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.182 Elsa -1 1 2 12.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:25:45.08 -22:31:17.5: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:25:45.08 -22:31:17.5: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461252.6774,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260731.1774 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 31.1774 2461252.6774 11.62 18:49:54.93 -28:26:31.9
7.05381 -12.23805 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX17" Gaia DR3 4071834609579449344
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
19.490 G 20.250 G 0.257871000000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis 2 -1 2 11.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:54.93 -28:26:31.9: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:49:54.93 -28:26:31.9: 14.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4071834609579449344,2461252.6774,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4071834609579449344 20260731.1774 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 31.1774 2461252.6774 11.74 19:15:58.74 -23:12:19.5
14.42485 -15.49141 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J191559-2312.3
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.940 V Y 1.630 V 2452389.40000 204.081635000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:15:58.74 -23:12:19.5: 12.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:15:58.74 -23:12:19.5: 12.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J191559-2312.3,2461252.6774,11.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J191559-2312.3 20260731.1774 11.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461252.67771025 31.07.2026 04:15:44.166 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10656
Objects passed selection criteria: 10634
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8918
Average stars matched: 8805.25 (98.7357 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237340 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 30 23:20:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
First image: 2461177.90916910 17.05.2026 09:49:02.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Last image: 2461252.67771025 31.07.2026 04:15:44.166 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 91
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 114149
Objects passed selection criteria: 113917
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 91306.2
Average stars matched: 89331.8 (97.8375 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 582528 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 30 23:22:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461252.67715775
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.832 -26:00:15.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:00.832 -26:00:15.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0030 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:58.261 -25:59:55.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:11:58.261 -25:59:55.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0082 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:00.832 -26:00:15.73
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:58.261 -25:59:55.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01115 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jz56shAYQC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.McwLv5dJXw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T89Lriun2H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.60YFb5VGOz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.554850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.554850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 10687 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9561 to 297.0874 deg, Dec -31.2647 to -20.5650 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9561 to 297.0874 deg, Dec -31.2647 to -20.5650 deg
Loaded 13339 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7826 out of 8095 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8095 out of 10687 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
3.5 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
3.5 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.2 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jz56shAYQC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, bad_region=0, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 12254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4840 stars left (next iteration limit 5324)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=4840 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.681 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.523 n_q1=1362 n_q2=1078 n_q3=1193 n_q4=1207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.McwLv5dJXw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=726, bad_region=0, passed=10687
Got 10687 stars (including 9950 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10687 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5320)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.646 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.605 n_q1=1365 n_q2=1000 n_q3=1256 n_q4=1215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.068
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.T89Lriun2H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, bad_region=0, passed=6014
Got 6014 stars (including 5647 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6014 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6014 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6014 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6014 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4833 stars left (next iteration limit 5319)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=9.480 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.582 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.643 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=0.416 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.620 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4833 robust_rms_before=0.948 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.521 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.813 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.643
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.830 -26:00:16.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6014 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4134852.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.948 -> 0.489 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits N_match=4833 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.703 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.450 n_q1=1228 n_q2=930 n_q3=1452 n_q4=1223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.60YFb5VGOz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=351, bad_region=1, passed=5995
Got 5995 stars (including 5635 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5995 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5320)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4836 robust_rms=9.621 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.480 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4836 robust_rms=0.488 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.659 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4836 robust_rms=0.412 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.606 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4836 robust_rms_before=0.957 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.518 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.412 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.801 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.606
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:58.257 -25:59:56.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5995 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4136568.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.957 -> 0.412 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=1230 n_q2=935 n_q3=1447 n_q4=1224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.424
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.550 worst_q_ratio=1.238
ref2=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits sigma_overall=0.605 worst_q_ratio=1.068
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits sigma_overall=0.546 worst_q_ratio=1.287
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits sigma_overall=0.423 worst_q_ratio=1.424
reference average sigma_overall=0.5775 worst_q_ratio=1.153
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (4840 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055_astrometric_residuals.png (4836 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.56 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004_astrometric_residuals.png (4833 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005_astrometric_residuals.png (4836 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:52:27.42 -23:21:35.6: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:52:27.42 -23:21:35.6: 14.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20212.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20212_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 20212_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20273_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20273_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:50.03 -20:59:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20280_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20280_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.18 -22:42:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20345_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20345_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:55.34 -25:35:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
18:52:27.42 -23:21:35.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.832 -26:00:15.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:12:00.832 -26:00:15.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0030 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:58.261 -25:59:55.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.242 -26:00:08.32
Second-epoch image center 19:11:58.261 -25:59:55.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0082 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:00.832 -26:00:15.73
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:58.261 -25:59:55.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01115 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YlIZNTY6Nr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f7yepKrSGb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4ziwB0mgvx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PK1Cf2HJ2C
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.361800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.361800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 118893 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9129 to 297.0888 deg, Dec -31.2647 to -20.5527 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9129 to 297.0888 deg, Dec -31.2647 to -20.5527 deg
Loaded 13400 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10023 out of 11609 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11609 out of 118893 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 80 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
3.1 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
3.1 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 12.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YlIZNTY6Nr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, bad_region=0, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 131996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145618 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145618 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145618 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4850 stars left (next iteration limit 5336)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=4850 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.720 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.555 n_q1=1385 n_q2=1149 n_q3=1065 n_q4=1251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.f7yepKrSGb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=8799, bad_region=0, passed=118877
Got 118877 stars (including 109929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 118877 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5320)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.642 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.587 n_q1=1388 n_q2=1022 n_q3=1175 n_q4=1251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4ziwB0mgvx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2587, bad_region=1, passed=51982
Got 51982 stars (including 49318 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51982 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4831 stars left (next iteration limit 5316)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits N_match=4831 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.703 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=1139 n_q2=919 n_q3=1483 n_q4=1290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.372
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PK1Cf2HJ2C (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2484, bad_region=2, passed=52010
Got 52010 stars (including 49455 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52010 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4831 stars left (next iteration limit 5315)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=4831 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=1137 n_q2=913 n_q3=1490 n_q4=1291 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.363
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-14-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_231627_TTUQ1b1x1_3774119_aFtdK8tl/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:05:01.62 -29:45:07.4: 12.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:24.92 -23:14:52.6: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:20:23.70 -30:37:17.0: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:18:17.86 -27:00:00.8: 12.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:40.53 -28:20:06.2: 9.85 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:45:23.08 -28:08:49.5: 12.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:15:09.15 -29:44:20.5: 12.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:15:09.15 -29:44:20.5: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:07:40.53 -28:20:06.2: 9.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:18:17.86 -27:00:00.8: 12.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:06:24.92 -23:14:52.6: 12.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:05:01.62 -29:45:07.4: 12.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:45:23.08 -28:08:49.5: 12.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:20:23.70 -30:37:17.0: 12.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.87 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:15:09.15 -29:44:20.5: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2074 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:40.53 -28:20:06.2: ref_mag=9.87 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9967 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:17.86 -27:00:00.8: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8667 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:24.92 -23:14:52.6: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5295 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:23.08 -28:08:49.5: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6236 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:05:01.62 -29:45:07.4: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4460 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:23.70 -30:37:17.0: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1758 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:11.05 -30:50:58.3: 15.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:26:05.68 -21:31:57.3: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:11.05 -30:50:58.3: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:41:51.79 -30:28:52.4: 12.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:34.78 -21:50:44.3: 12.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:26:05.68 -21:31:57.3: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:05.68 -21:31:57.3: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4595 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:03.68 -23:58:23.3: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:34.78 -21:50:44.3: 12.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:41:51.79 -30:28:52.4: 12.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:34.78 -21:50:44.3: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5454 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:51.79 -30:28:52.4: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0266 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:42:03.68 -23:58:23.3: 14.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:37:13.43 -29:54:33.2: 14.63 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:49.21 -24:26:03.0: 12.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:24.73 -24:41:32.1: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:04:46.79 -22:16:52.0: 15.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:37:13.43 -29:54:33.2: 14.05 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:37:13.43 -29:54:33.2: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=12.5535 delta=1.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:08:49.21 -24:26:03.0: 12.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:49.21 -24:26:03.0: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8161 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:25:45.08 -22:31:17.5: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:04:46.79 -22:16:52.0: 14.95 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:50:24.73 -24:41:32.1: 14.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.36
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:04:46.79 -22:16:52.0: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.36 new_mean_mag=13.1005 delta=1.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:51:20.42 -21:15:18.3: 14.44 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:47:07.09 -21:25:10.7: 14.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:25:45.08 -22:31:17.5: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:54:26.56 -27:02:44.4: 14.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:51:20.42 -21:15:18.3: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:20.42 -21:15:18.3: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.5782 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:47:07.09 -21:25:10.7: 13.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:07.09 -21:25:10.7: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3346 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:54:26.56 -27:02:44.4: 14.25 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:54:26.56 -27:02:44.4: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=12.6342 delta=1.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:46:20.18 -28:36:47.8: 12.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:41:37.76 -27:10:21.0: 14.27 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:46:20.18 -28:36:47.8: 12.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:20.18 -28:36:47.8: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.1817 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:54.93 -28:26:31.9: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:41:37.76 -27:10:21.0: 13.76 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:41:37.76 -27:10:21.0: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.5662 delta=1.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:49:54.93 -28:26:31.9: 14.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:57:29.26 -25:41:02.9: 13.81 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:15:58.74 -23:12:19.5: 12.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:57:29.26 -25:41:02.9: 13.78 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:57:29.26 -25:41:02.9: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.5695 delta=1.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:15:58.74 -23:12:19.5: 12.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:15:58.74 -23:12:19.5: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.7471 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out157513.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162980.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162991.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52741.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out72480.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130886.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159745.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out162209.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out162548.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out162766.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out163102.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161412_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 161412_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161414_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 161414_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161427_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 161427_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161431_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 161431_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161435_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 161435_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161444_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 161444_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161450_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 161450_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:16.78 -23:01:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161456_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 161456_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161485_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 161485_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:27.45 -23:21:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161595_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 161595_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.14 -22:42:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161698_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 161698_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:18.08 -23:18:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161795_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 161795_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:01.60 -21:22:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161955_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 161955_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:27.71 -22:23:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162095_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162095_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:37.58 -22:17:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162181_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162181_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:57.64 -27:38:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162209_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 162209_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162269_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162269_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:09.28 -23:24:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162292_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162292_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162319_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162319_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:12.71 -21:03:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162336_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162336_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:35.44 -21:30:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162348_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162348_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:10.83 -25:29:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162364_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162364_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:21.54 -21:14:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162386_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162386_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162406_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162406_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162449_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162449_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:41.96 -22:09:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162462_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162462_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:09.11 -24:31:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162464_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162464_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:43.49 -29:00:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162468_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162468_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:59.12 -22:22:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162512_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162512_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:13.89 -22:40:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162548_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 162548_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162566_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162566_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:01.50 -30:01:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162585_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162585_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:22.68 -29:30:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162637_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162637_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:35.67 -22:18:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162644_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162644_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:53.75 -22:42:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162665_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162665_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:24:28.05 -22:37:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162675_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162675_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:06.37 -26:53:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162688_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162688_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:02.37 -22:30:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162691_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162691_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:17.89 -25:11:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162733_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162733_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:54.25 -21:30:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162766_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 162766_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162771_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162771_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:34.28 -25:37:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162803_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162803_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162900_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162900_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:49.24 -24:04:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162955_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162955_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:53.01 -22:06:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162969_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162969_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:08.75 -29:11:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162975_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162975_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:28.48 -24:15:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162980_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162980_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:46.79 -22:16:52.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.08)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.935 4081555117001436672 286.19549494856 -22.28131706414 13.1563 11.1731 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.935#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162991_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 162991_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:24.73 -24:41:32.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.174 4074771881876526464 282.60309031300 -24.69223060377 12.9349 11.0115 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.174#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163041_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 163041_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:53.19 -25:12:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163052_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 163052_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:18.35 -24:55:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163102_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 163102_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163119_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 163119_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:16.42 -23:40:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163188_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 163188_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:29.78 -24:20:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163204_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 163204_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163206_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 163206_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52741_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 52741_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:26.56 -27:02:44.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.698 4072025855904579584 283.61031486610 -27.04601920237 11.5715 9.7639 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.698#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17696_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 17696_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:48.71 -29:27:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51151_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 51151_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:10.53 -26:58:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156515_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 156515_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156639_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 156639_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:20.98 -26:02:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157513_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 157513_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:37.76 -27:10:21.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.479 6766660673507218688 295.40841783386 -27.17244597544 11.8845 10.0379 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.479#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159745_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 159745_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56028_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 56028_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:32.99 -26:40:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158010_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 158010_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:37.44 -25:02:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157620_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 157620_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:27.39 -24:05:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157049_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 157049_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:49.88 -22:29:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156893_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 156893_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:01.34 -23:10:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156824_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 156824_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:59.45 -23:54:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156822_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 156822_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:14.35 -24:02:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156807_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 156807_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:33.63 -24:07:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156770_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 156770_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.49 -23:55:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156762_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 156762_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.89 -28:06:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156129_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 156129_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:35.91 -27:18:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72480_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 72480_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:29.26 -25:41:02.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.594 4073751470680082432 284.37182494934 -25.68428174618 12.0551 10.5680 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.594#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130886_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 130886_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104904_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 104904_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:34.01 -21:07:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32093_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 32093_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:32.39 -28:24:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13972_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 13972_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:37.75 -29:58:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25126_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 25126_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:09.77 -28:59:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27660_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 27660_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_23-15-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
