This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 30.4240 2461251.9240 12.60 05:59:27.29 +31:32:53.8
179.26760 3.90023 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina -0 -0 0 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:59:27.29 +31:32:53.8: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:27.29 +31:32:53.8: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461251.9240,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260730.4240 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 30.4240 2461251.9240 12.78 06:03:59.68 +31:28:24.3
179.80874 4.70688 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.141 Lumen -1 -1 1 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:03:59.68 +31:28:24.3: 15.42 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:59.68 +31:28:24.3: 15.09 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.12
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461251.9240,12.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260730.4240 12.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 30.4240 2461251.9240 11.62 06:07:55.62 +33:29:37.4
178.43000 6.40576 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia 1 -0 1 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:07:55.62 +33:29:37.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:55.62 +33:29:37.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461251.9240,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260730.4240 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461251.92421076 30.07.2026 10:10:41.810 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25169
Objects passed selection criteria: 24976
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15652.5
Average stars matched: 15157.8 (96.8392 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 30 05:12:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461251.92421076 30.07.2026 10:10:41.810 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 106
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 192912
Objects passed selection criteria: 192258
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 125369
Average stars matched: 120312 (95.9661 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 654236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 30 05:13:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461251.92368934
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:01.454 +30:01:24.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:01.454 +30:01:24.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0259 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.237 +30:01:06.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:03.237 +30:01:06.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0230 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:01.454 +30:01:24.45
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:03.237 +30:01:06.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00810 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZTSTCIRuxl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8YVI11awq2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0HBizgwaC6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6obvMNnHXY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec +24.3425 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec 24.3425 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17091 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11926 out of 13489 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13489 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec +24.3425 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec 24.3425 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17091 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11926 out of 13489 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13489 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5948 to 99.6661 deg, Dec +24.3432 to +35.3120 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5948 to 99.6661 deg, Dec 24.3432 to 35.3120 deg
Loaded 17084 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12065 out of 13603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13603 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 10.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZTSTCIRuxl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=0, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 24022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4792 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4792 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=1002 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8YVI11awq2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=0, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 23994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4796 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4798 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4798 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=1006 n_q2=1396 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1123 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0HBizgwaC6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=297, bad_region=0, passed=4295
Got 4295 stars (including 3992 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 3834 stars left (next iteration limit 4216)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3834 robust_rms=7.578 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.870 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3834 robust_rms=0.567 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.885 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3834 robust_rms=0.418 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.571 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3834 robust_rms_before=1.420 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.443 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.418 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.609 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.571
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.609 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits N_match=3834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=1019 n_q2=723 n_q3=1320 n_q4=772 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.364
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6obvMNnHXY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=301, bad_region=0, passed=4340
Got 4340 stars (including 4035 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4340 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 3873 stars left (next iteration limit 4259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3873 robust_rms=7.580 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.976 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3873 robust_rms=0.520 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.760 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3873 robust_rms=0.388 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.493 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3873 robust_rms_before=1.434 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.424 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.388 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.547 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.493
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.547 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits N_match=3873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=1035 n_q2=738 n_q3=1330 n_q4=770 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.312
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.458 worst_q_ratio=1.287
ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.463 worst_q_ratio=1.244
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.364
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits sigma_overall=0.429 worst_q_ratio=1.312
reference average sigma_overall=0.4605 worst_q_ratio=1.2655
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4792 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4798 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438_astrometric_residuals.png (3834 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439_astrometric_residuals.png (3873 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:37:11.30 +34:48:46.8: 9.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:37:11.30 +34:48:46.8: 9.73 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.74 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:11.30 +34:48:46.8: ref_mag=9.74 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3089 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31900_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 31900_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.74 +31:24:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.08 +31:35:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:01.454 +30:01:24.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:01.454 +30:01:24.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0259 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.237 +30:01:06.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:03.237 +30:01:06.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0230 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:01.454 +30:01:24.45
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:03.237 +30:01:06.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00810 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AajEVwfmzg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pDIZYQQ4jZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eWWAbxgwOS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Wah7f3njSU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17188 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9142 out of 14161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14161 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17188 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9142 out of 14161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14161 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec +24.3258 to +35.3145 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec 24.3258 to 35.3145 deg
Loaded 17176 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9258 out of 14259 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14259 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 92 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 12.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AajEVwfmzg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=79, blended=32424, bad_region=1, passed=212748
Got 212748 stars (including 179989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1028 n_q2=1362 n_q3=1243 n_q4=1133 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pDIZYQQ4jZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=32176, bad_region=4, passed=212590
Got 212590 stars (including 180083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4806 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=1026 n_q2=1364 n_q3=1217 n_q4=1159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eWWAbxgwOS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1476, bad_region=2, passed=39199
Got 39199 stars (including 37656 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39199 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.424 n_q1=1232 n_q2=841 n_q3=1743 n_q4=967 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.366
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Wah7f3njSU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1498, bad_region=2, passed=39687
Got 39687 stars (including 38139 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39687 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5265)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.414 n_q1=1234 n_q2=853 n_q3=1735 n_q4=967 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.381
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-09-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_051116_TTUQ1b1x1_3453381_ncNHpdRT/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:48:04.82 +30:05:41.6: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:55.00 +26:56:08.3: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:27:29.92 +29:01:22.0: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:31:29.06 +34:51:22.9: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:41:12.02 +26:16:27.3: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:32.30 +26:51:56.8: 11.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:23.31 +25:47:51.1: 10.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:41:12.02 +26:16:27.3: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:31:29.06 +34:51:22.9: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:48:04.82 +30:05:41.6: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:27:29.92 +29:01:22.0: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:55.00 +26:56:08.3: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:32.30 +26:51:56.8: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:12.02 +26:16:27.3: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3435 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:04.82 +30:05:41.6: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7637 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:29.06 +34:51:22.9: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5967 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:29.92 +29:01:22.0: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1850 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:32.30 +26:51:56.8: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9150 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:55.00 +26:56:08.3: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5969 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:22.10 +32:31:06.6: 11.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:16.61 +32:31:38.5: 11.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:23.31 +25:47:51.1: 10.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:23.31 +25:47:51.1: ref_mag=10.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9396 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:22.10 +32:31:06.6: 11.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:22.10 +32:31:06.6: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.4184 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:16.61 +32:31:38.5: 11.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:16.61 +32:31:38.5: ref_mag=11.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1024 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:37:11.28 +34:48:46.7: 9.99 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:37:11.28 +34:48:46.7: 9.99 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.99 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:11.28 +34:48:46.7: ref_mag=9.99 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4033 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:24.08 +32:33:20.3: 12.43 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:33.32 +25:41:03.8: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:40:56.80 +28:06:35.4: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:16.89 +32:35:25.1: 12.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:24.08 +32:33:20.3: 12.36 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:24.08 +32:33:20.3: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.1469 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:33.32 +25:41:03.8: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:33.32 +25:41:03.8: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9993 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:40:56.80 +28:06:35.4: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:56.80 +28:06:35.4: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1547 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:59:27.29 +31:32:53.8: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:16.89 +32:35:25.1: 12.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:16.89 +32:35:25.1: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3321 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:20.83 +30:53:55.4: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:06:18.85 +29:32:46.1: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:27.29 +31:32:53.8: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:20.83 +30:53:55.4: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:20.83 +30:53:55.4: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6621 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:18.85 +29:32:46.1: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:18.85 +29:32:46.1: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4875 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:03:59.68 +31:28:24.3: 15.42 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:07:55.62 +33:29:37.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:59.68 +31:28:24.3: 15.09 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:03:59.68 +31:28:24.3: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=12.7750 delta=2.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:55.62 +33:29:37.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242746.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31654.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74073.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242156_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242156_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:21.27 +34:19:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242157_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242157_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242165_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242165_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242166_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242166_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242172_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242172_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:59.61 +34:57:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242173_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242173_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:57.03 +33:47:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242174_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242174_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242176_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242176_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:54.23 +25:28:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242179_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242179_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242183_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242183_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242186_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242186_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.14 +32:30:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242187_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242187_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242188_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242188_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:19.85 +32:31:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242189_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242189_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:44.12 +33:42:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242190_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242190_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:14.58 +32:34:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242192_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242192_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242193_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242193_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.05 +32:31:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242262_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242262_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242300_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242300_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242317_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242317_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242322_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242322_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.30 +32:03:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242326_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242326_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242345_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242345_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.48 +34:26:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242373_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242373_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242395_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242395_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.44 +27:56:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242445_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242445_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.77 +28:29:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242447_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242447_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.21 +30:28:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242453_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242453_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.62 +34:23:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242470_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242470_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.90 +32:35:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242479_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242479_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:33.44 +28:34:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242482_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242482_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:09.88 +34:55:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242496_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242496_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.63 +27:35:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242504_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242504_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.23 +28:37:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242521_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242521_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:02.56 +26:58:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242532_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242532_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242548_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242548_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.00 +32:26:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242553_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242553_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:20.58 +35:01:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242558_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242558_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:49.70 +26:44:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242565_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242565_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242569_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242569_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242610_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242610_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242626_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242626_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:10.43 +32:41:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242631_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242631_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.68 +30:30:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242632_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242632_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.80 +25:55:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242640_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242640_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:15.11 +34:48:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242656_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242656_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:11.72 +32:30:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242675_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242675_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242684_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242684_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:16.62 +32:45:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242685_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242685_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:19.45 +31:39:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242701_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242701_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:23.38 +28:38:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242713_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242713_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242746_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 242746_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242748_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242748_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242796_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242796_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242804_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242804_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.72 +30:30:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242828_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242828_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:24.65 +28:37:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242831_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242831_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.13 +33:06:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242847_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242847_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.77 +31:57:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.27 +27:29:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:52.12 +29:02:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 209789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:00.54 +25:17:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.03 +28:36:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87651_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 87651_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:42.36 +30:33:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:12.80 +30:56:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:28.41 +27:23:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:30.90 +31:25:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34292_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 34292_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:25.25 +33:25:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241550_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 241550_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.19 +27:36:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:14.73 +32:22:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:39.92 +28:00:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:47.43 +29:32:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74073_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 74073_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:40.09 +32:01:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.65 +29:51:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31654_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 31654_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:11.40 +33:40:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:48.42 +30:50:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.04 +28:29:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 210727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:43.35 +25:12:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:00.37 +32:13:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:56.78 +30:53:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93431_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 93431_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:50.03 +30:19:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 167008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:33.87 +25:26:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:54.33 +27:45:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:33.04 +29:09:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:03.11 +32:03:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.92 +25:25:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.06 +31:35:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_05-10-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks