NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cam-01-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 513791 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 513791 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits_preview.png'
Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits

renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits_preview.png'
Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 676.8026 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 607.2003 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4246.4967 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 994.9753 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4247.1469 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 994.6513 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 6.27435 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-30T00:55:04.7919532' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-30T05:55:04.7919532' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61251.2465832294 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-30T05:55:14.6934431' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61251.2466978356 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 89.9976896038775 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 85.0002611348501 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.1158333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 2.21638888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.04882804461373 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits :) Spent 0.515405 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-30T00:55:47.0250617' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-30T05:55:47.0250617' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61251.2470720485 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-30T05:55:56.9258586' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61251.2471866319 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 89.9976891805228 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 85.0002611588355 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.1213888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 2.2325 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.04847437972528 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits :) Spent 0.522920 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits


fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461251.74669897 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits' wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:59:19.957 +85:01:57.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:58:25.653 +84:59:37.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:59:19.957 +85:01:57.15 Second-epoch image center 05:58:25.653 +84:59:37.82 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0434 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:58:26.783 +84:59:43.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:59:19.957 +85:01:57.15 Second-epoch image center 05:58:26.783 +84:59:43.18 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0419 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:58:25.653 +84:59:37.82 Second-epoch second image center 05:58:26.783 +84:59:43.18 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00154 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00154 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NmmLMHUt2W Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oiYADppQff Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hHphRFOL8F Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C5unvC3oot Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 11653 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3714 to 179.5198 deg, Dec +75.7550 to +89.8981 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3714 to 179.5198 deg, Dec 75.7550 to 89.8981 deg Loaded 33449 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7286 out of 7617 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7617 out of 11653 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796150 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796150 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 11653 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3714 to 179.5198 deg, Dec +75.7550 to +89.8981 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3714 to 179.5198 deg, Dec 75.7550 to 89.8981 deg Loaded 33449 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7286 out of 7617 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7617 out of 11653 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits (aperture=6.1) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 11626 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3725 to 179.5198 deg, Dec +75.7550 to +89.8803 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3725 to 179.5198 deg, Dec 75.7550 to 89.8803 deg Loaded 33449 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7295 out of 7610 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7610 out of 11626 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits (aperture=6.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits 2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits 3.5 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 3.5 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits 15.1 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits 13.7 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 13.7 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.NmmLMHUt2W (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=785, bad_region=0, passed=11653 Got 11653 stars (including 10853 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11653 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3714 through 0 to 179.5198, gap 179.5198 to 181.3714 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11653 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3553 through 0 to 179.5094, gap 179.5094 to 181.3553 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11653 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11653 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4920 stars left (next iteration limit 5410) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits N_match=4920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=1192 n_q2=1023 n_q3=1285 n_q4=1420 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.oiYADppQff (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=780, bad_region=1, passed=11626 Got 11626 stars (including 10830 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11626 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3725 through 0 to 179.5198, gap 179.5198 to 181.3725 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11626 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3543 through 0 to 179.5090, gap 179.5090 to 181.3543 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11626 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11626 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5409) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits N_match=4919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=1195 n_q2=1020 n_q3=1283 n_q4=1421 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.hHphRFOL8F (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=267, bad_region=0, passed=4782 Got 4782 stars (including 4510 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4782 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0340 through 0 to 179.9695, gap 179.9695 to 180.0340 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4435 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4426 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4426 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4426 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0289 through 0 to 179.9666, gap 179.9666 to 180.0289 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4435 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4426 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4426 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4426 stars left (next iteration limit 4868) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4426 robust_rms=10.716 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.378 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4426 robust_rms=0.446 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.475 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4426 robust_rms=0.353 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.437 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4426 robust_rms_before=0.916 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.353 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.478 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.437 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.478 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits N_match=4426 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1208 n_q2=1008 n_q3=1261 n_q4=949 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.C5unvC3oot (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=270, bad_region=0, passed=4753 Got 4753 stars (including 4479 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4753 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0329 through 0 to 179.9697, gap 179.9697 to 180.0329 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4404 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4395 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4395 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4395 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4753 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0269 through 0 to 179.9670, gap 179.9670 to 180.0269 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4404 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4395 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4753 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4395 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4753 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4395 stars left (next iteration limit 4834) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4395 robust_rms=10.650 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.364 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4395 robust_rms=0.436 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.482 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4395 robust_rms=0.350 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.423 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4395 robust_rms_before=0.908 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.353 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.350 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.452 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.423 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.452 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits N_match=4395 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1198 n_q2=1009 n_q3=1250 n_q4=938 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits sigma_overall=0.269 worst_q_ratio=1.131 ref2=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits sigma_overall=0.279 worst_q_ratio=1.162 new1=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.264 new2=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits sigma_overall=0.348 worst_q_ratio=1.240 reference average sigma_overall=0.274 worst_q_ratio=1.1465 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540_astrometric_residuals.png (4920 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541_astrometric_residuals.png (4919 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214_astrometric_residuals.png (4426 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215_astrometric_residuals.png (4395 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 09:21:18.01 +81:23:20.4: 9.72 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 09:21:18.01 +81:23:20.4: 9.73 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.72 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:21:18.01 +81:23:20.4: ref_mag=9.72 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9528 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20598_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 20598_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.24670    2461251.74670    9.91    09:21:18.42 +81:23:19.9   8825 2995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    10.01    09:21:17.60 +81:23:20.9   8825 2994   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11436_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 11436_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    10.21    02:43:16.13 +81:08:13.0   0767 2593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 02:43:16.22 +81:08:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08924_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 08924_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    10.92    06:23:25.60 +80:04:17.3   5498 0272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 06:23:25.48 +80:04:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:59:19.957 +85:01:57.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:58:25.653 +84:59:37.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:59:19.957 +85:01:57.15 Second-epoch image center 05:58:25.653 +84:59:37.82 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0434 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:58:26.783 +84:59:43.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:59:19.957 +85:01:57.15 Second-epoch image center 05:58:26.783 +84:59:43.18 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0419 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:58:25.653 +84:59:37.82 Second-epoch second image center 05:58:26.783 +84:59:43.18 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00154 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00154 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7adMSXWkxs Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZH3IXo5pNb Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aD2g0olBrp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mlsyecEkmH Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 70994 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0143 to 359.9893 deg, Dec +75.7550 to +89.9630 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0143 to 359.9893 deg, Dec 75.7550 to 89.9630 deg Loaded 33577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6810 out of 7815 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7815 out of 70994 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.667500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.667500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 70994 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0143 to 359.9893 deg, Dec +75.7550 to +89.9630 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0143 to 359.9893 deg, Dec 75.7550 to 89.9630 deg Loaded 33577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6810 out of 7815 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7815 out of 70994 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits (aperture=4.7) Read 71140 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0149 to 359.9884 deg, Dec +75.7549 to +89.9625 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0149 to 359.9884 deg, Dec 75.7549 to 89.9625 deg Loaded 33577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6838 out of 7807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 71140 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 30 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits 2.0 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits 3.2 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 3.2 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits 15.3 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits 13.8 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 13.7 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.7adMSXWkxs (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=4260, bad_region=0, passed=70984 Got 70984 stars (including 66619 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70984 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0088 through 0 to 179.9951, gap 179.9951 to 180.0088 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70984 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0713 through 0 to 179.9937, gap 179.9937 to 180.0713 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70984 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70984 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.242 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=1167 n_q2=1038 n_q3=1309 n_q4=1404 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ZH3IXo5pNb (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=4141, bad_region=1, passed=71128 Got 71128 stars (including 66865 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71128 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0146 through 0 to 179.9984, gap 179.9984 to 180.0146 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71128 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0729 through 0 to 179.9976, gap 179.9976 to 180.0729 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71128 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71128 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1159 n_q2=1047 n_q3=1298 n_q4=1417 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.aD2g0olBrp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=856, bad_region=0, passed=24769 Got 24769 stars (including 23873 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24769 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0044 through 0 to 179.9911, gap 179.9911 to 180.0044 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24769 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0265 through 0 to 179.9945, gap 179.9945 to 180.0265 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24769 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24769 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=1330 n_q2=1123 n_q3=1395 n_q4=1070 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.mlsyecEkmH (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=968, bad_region=1, passed=24891 Got 24891 stars (including 23891 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24891 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0025 through 0 to 179.9925, gap 179.9925 to 180.0025 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24891 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0270 through 0 to 179.9938, gap 179.9938 to 180.0270 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24891 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24891 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5404) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.283 n_q1=1328 n_q2=1118 n_q3=1401 n_q4=1066 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 08:16:50.38 +79:29:25.1: 11.06 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 02:47:02.24 +86:42:42.6: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 01:12:03.88 +86:52:31.0: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 00:16:00.63 +86:41:22.2: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 07:09:20.58 +85:35:57.0: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 08:08:24.98 +84:40:25.7: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 08:16:50.38 +79:29:25.1: 11.07 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 02:47:02.24 +86:42:42.6: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 03:11:10.75 +83:35:20.1: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.07 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:16:50.38 +79:29:25.1: ref_mag=11.07 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0485 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:47:02.24 +86:42:42.6: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1557 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 01:12:03.88 +86:52:31.0: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 00:16:00.63 +86:41:22.2: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:12:03.88 +86:52:31.0: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8110 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:00.63 +86:41:22.2: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8181 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 07:09:20.58 +85:35:57.0: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:20.58 +85:35:57.0: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8176 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 08:08:24.98 +84:40:25.7: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:08:24.98 +84:40:25.7: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8759 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 03:11:10.75 +83:35:20.1: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:10.75 +83:35:20.1: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8585 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86587_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 86587_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.24670    2461251.74670    13.28    02:47:01.15 +86:42:43.4   3285 4850   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    13.09    02:47:03.33 +86:42:41.7   3285 4849   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86590_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 86590_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    12.96    03:21:02.91 +87:11:45.4   3683 4881   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 03:21:02.56 +87:11:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87262_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 87262_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    10.80    08:36:39.28 +80:13:16.3   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87484_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 87484_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.24670    2461251.74670    11.06    08:16:50.27 +79:29:25.0   8439 1052   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    11.04    08:16:50.49 +79:29:25.2   8439 1051   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87506_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 87506_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    11.44    04:02:57.50 +86:25:04.0   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87541_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 87541_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    11.24    06:04:58.51 +82:10:43.7   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87703_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 87703_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    11.73    08:29:55.97 +88:37:36.7   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87788_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 87788_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    11.54    06:43:57.77 +82:20:41.3   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87819_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 87819_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    12.00    02:17:02.92 +89:04:16.8   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87856_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 87856_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    11.51    06:24:08.31 +80:01:39.2   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 88607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    12.43    01:31:16.77 +89:02:13.5   4198 5975   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 01:31:16.19 +89:02:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 88728_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 88728_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    12.57    00:38:34.79 +84:41:45.6   1574 5592   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 00:38:35.03 +84:41:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89330_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 89330_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.24670    2461251.74670    12.83    00:16:00.20 +86:41:22.1   2733 6023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    12.81    00:16:01.05 +86:41:22.3   2733 6022   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89588_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 89588_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    12.69    08:09:42.16 +81:42:12.6   7522 2058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 08:09:41.81 +81:42:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89631_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 89631_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    12.85    02:18:13.01 +89:17:30.9   4382 5963   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 02:18:19.22 +89:17:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89664_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 89664_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    12.89    09:29:21.54 +83:14:55.3   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89686_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 89686_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.24670    2461251.74670    12.98    01:12:03.73 +86:52:29.3   2948 5582   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    12.71    01:12:04.04 +86:52:32.7   2949 5581   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89731_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 89731_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.24670    2461251.74670    12.82    07:09:20.12 +85:35:57.3   5585 3701   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    12.82    07:09:21.04 +85:35:56.7   5585 3700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89898_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 89898_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.24670    2461251.74670    12.87    08:08:24.75 +84:40:24.7   6505 3538   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    12.88    08:08:25.22 +84:40:26.6   6505 3537   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89935_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 89935_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    12.92    05:31:47.16 +85:54:58.0   4493 3760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:31:46.80 +85:54:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89938_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 89938_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.24670    2461251.74670    12.93    03:11:10.17 +83:35:19.1   2210 3274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    12.82    03:11:11.32 +83:35:21.1   2211 3273   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90181_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 90181_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    13.01    06:00:23.37 +85:09:09.0   4812 3290   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 06:00:22.85 +85:09:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90318_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 90318_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    12.99    05:05:28.66 +80:21:16.7   3513 0520   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90830_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 90830_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    13.36    08:45:11.48 +83:27:15.2   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90888_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 90888_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    13.57    07:16:45.43 +84:00:07.9   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20648_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 20648_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    12.32    00:27:20.31 +86:55:00.1   2882 5943   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 00:27:20.30 +86:54:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 47967_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 47967_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    11.68    03:54:55.84 +81:55:13.1   2315 1974   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 03:54:55.77 +81:55:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 62096_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 62096_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    10.92    06:23:25.61 +80:04:17.4   5498 0272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 06:23:25.49 +80:04:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 42252_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 42252_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    10.28    02:43:16.16 +81:08:13.2   0767 2593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 02:43:16.24 +81:08:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 62018_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 62018_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 30.24719    2461251.74719    12.74    02:13:36.65 +82:44:06.2   1127 3691   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011226_TTUQ1b1x1_4118779_5z0u9G5m/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-55-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 02:13:36.67 +82:44:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461251.74669897 -observatory V36 07:16:05.25 +19:39:16.5 Mercury (0.6mag) 11:30:17.05 +03:20:45.4 Venus (-4.3mag) 05:23:00.71 +23:13:55.7 Mars (1.3mag) 08:34:48.76 +19:10:47.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:48.24 +03:20:26.2 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:10:34.56 +20:53:56.7 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:33.07 +00:16:31.2 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:29:00.61 -23:26:35.6 Pluto (14.4mag) 21:08:45.46 -18:40:22.8 Moon (-12.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 30 01:15 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461251.74669897: 08:34:54.17 +19:10:24.6 Io (5.9mag) 08:34:43.42 +19:11:09.7 Europa (6.2mag) 08:34:48.17 +19:10:53.7 Ganymede (5.5mag) 08:34:51.87 +19:10:31.2 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:32:34.73 +19:04:51.1 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:34:52.43 +19:10:32.9 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:32:00.85 +19:05:09.5 Elara (17.7mag) 08:38:49.43 +18:54:35.9 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:38:34.65 +19:19:12.3 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:54.71 +03:19:53.9 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:52.20 +03:20:11.7 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:56:32.37 +03:17:55.2 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:57:01.85 +03:20:30.5 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:22.41 +03:14:49.6 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 30 01:15 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461251.74669897: 18:30:54.05 -27:06:36.6 JWST 18:57:21.42 +14:08:37.6 Chandra 23:17:47.31 +61:02:39.1 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 30 01:15 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461251.74669897 -observatory V36 03:02:58.98 +16:34:20.4 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:05:12.51 -34:39:03.5 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:45:16.96 -68:35:49.8 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:07:17.45 +32:48:37.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:15:03.30 +32:41:59.7 16.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:45:49.23 +31:53:52.5 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:34:17.56 +26:41:12.7 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:13:18.31 +28:52:36.7 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:22:50.60 +05:15:31.5 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:11:21.36 -11:57:21.0 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:22:57.76 +66:51:10.7 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:58:09.07 -12:05:02.1 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 07:57:43.45 +30:56:37.3 15.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:08:51.01 +15:36:49.9 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:14:51.33 +42:22:39.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:23:33.62 +48:30:11.5 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:07:40.49 -13:07:13.3 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:50:04.43 +25:42:57.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:26:34.38 -14:58:20.1 17.4mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:20:43.79 +21:26:43.6 17.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:53:05.66 +02:55:02.0 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:09:22.79 +78:34:26.2 17.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:03:07.73 +45:58:02.3 17.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:39:36.17 +07:31:05.8 17.2mag A/2026 E1 21:47:39.45 -23:22:11.4 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:23:44.28 -02:52:11.6 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:27:46.06 +31:35:57.4 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:49:18.99 +07:34:47.3 17.2mag 63P/Wild 00:53:58.31 -05:11:08.0 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 05:14:51.51 +20:45:22.8 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:50:50.07 +12:56:07.1 16.6mag 88P/Howell 07:32:16.81 +28:47:24.0 16.0mag 93P/Lovas 03:41:42.38 +13:25:13.5 17.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 05:26:39.60 +31:02:18.2 16.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:57:02.58 +28:05:36.9 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:26:01.00 -06:46:49.3 17.0mag 124P/Mrkos 05:23:03.05 +21:10:08.2 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:12:50.40 +19:16:55.2 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:04:12.75 +03:24:56.7 17.7mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 08:19:49.19 +12:25:57.1 17.9mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:22:19.09 -20:03:06.8 14.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:44:39.03 +37:07:06.0 15.7mag 162P/SidingSpring 17:22:43.87 +32:01:25.0 12.9mag 169P/NEAT 02:25:33.36 +09:13:40.0 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:37:47.42 -09:27:42.0 17.5mag 235P/LINEAR 20:29:00.04 -52:35:44.0 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:55:59.41 +21:15:43.8 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 06:38:04.18 +37:46:15.8 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:08:05.54 +04:06:34.5 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 08:52:40.69 +18:48:24.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:22:22.79 +37:31:16.4 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Jul 30 01:15 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Jul 30 01:15 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 30 01:15 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 08:49:47.663 -07:24:01.25 AT 2026uew 2026-02-19.37 20.99 04:43:45.409 -21:56:34.12 AT 2026uev 2026-01-14.29 21.36 14:23:02.118 +17:49:57.26 AT 2026ueu 2026-04-20.54 21.18 11:50:55.515 -19:56:24.73 AT 2026uet 2026-01-27.53 21.55 10:59:04.434 -17:05:34.76 AT 2026ues 2026-05-06.27 20.91 15:39:15.006 +12:22:05.73 AT 2026uer 2026-02-13.60 21.8 19:17:04.295 +46:23:18.13 AT 2026ueq 2026-07-01.31 17.5086 08:10:18.850 +45:21:28.27 AT 2026uep 2026-02-21.37 20.88 15:04:40.281 +05:21:56.55 AT 2026ueo 2026-07-09.29 21.15 17:12:49.063 +27:32:51.65 AT 2026uen 2026-07-08.32 19.49 10:28:53.926 +20:07:41.86 AT 2026uem 2026-01-14.45 21.07 11:11:53.428 +13:29:27.96 AT 2026uel 2026-01-29.63 22.38 14:49:01.370 +34:26:52.68 AT 2026uek 2026-06-13.34 20.33 13:48:44.907 -10:17:48.40 AT 2026uej 2026-05-19.33 20.99 14:32:34.192 +18:00:45.73 AT 2026uei 2026-02-13.54 21.3 08:49:51.222 +00:38:50.85 AT 2026ueh 2026-03-09.32 21.51 08:22:39.912 +47:57:53.40 AT 2026ueg 2026-03-06.30 20.74 21:46:30.478 -29:31:41.92 AT 2026uef 2026-06-16.55 21.46 13:18:31.879 -04:01:30.80 AT 2026uee 2026-01-20.63 19.75 13:58:22.667 -10:01:33.71 AT 2026ued 2026-02-17.61 21.26 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 30 01:15 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 97 C - WARNING