NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Aur-06-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Aur-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Aur-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Aur-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 701446 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 701446 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.png' -> 'transient_report/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits_preview.png'
Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits

renamed 'Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.png' -> 'transient_report/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits_preview.png'
Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 633.4791 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 806.5614 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 8478.8016 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 2069.9857 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 8531.4752 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 2046.4117 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 13.3845 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.012 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 23.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-29T05:49:45.5398316' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-29T10:49:45.5398316' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61250.4512215164 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-29T10:49:55.4421874' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61250.4513361342 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= 'PhotoGraphic DSO 16BIT' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 89.9971280372432 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.9998612004737 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.6325 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 67.5455555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.69575718519984 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aur-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29503 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29503 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 57.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 23.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 169.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.600608 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 19.99996 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 45972.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 45972.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000031.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 3310.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 435045.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 19999960.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 2096.518 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/d_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits :) Spent 0.841203 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/d_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 23.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-29T05:50:32.1179800' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-29T10:50:32.1179800' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61250.4517606134 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-29T10:50:42.0192399' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61250.4518752201 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= 'PhotoGraphic DSO 16BIT' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 89.99712797239 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.999861196299 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.78 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 67.6280555555555 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.67863545062346 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aur-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29503 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29503 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 57.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 23.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 169.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.600608 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 19.99996 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 45972.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 45972.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000031.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 3310.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 435045.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 19999960.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 2096.518 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/d_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits :) Spent 0.629668 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/d_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits


fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461250.95133726 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits Image size: 942.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 06:00:15.152 +30:00:54.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07 Second-epoch image center 06:00:15.152 +30:00:54.42 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0557 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits Image size: 942.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 06:00:15.927 +30:00:14.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07 Second-epoch image center 06:00:15.927 +30:00:14.66 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0561 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 06:00:15.152 +30:00:54.42 Second-epoch second image center 06:00:15.927 +30:00:14.66 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01139 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lfyldf4yM9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wBEFdNaiG7 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tAnx0PBAg5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LulYFRyH1o Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec +24.3425 to +35.3069 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec 24.3425 to 35.3069 deg Loaded 17091 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11926 out of 13489 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 13489 out of 27193 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946450 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946450 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec +24.3425 to +35.3069 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec 24.3425 to 35.3069 deg Loaded 17091 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11926 out of 13489 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 13489 out of 27193 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5948 to 99.6661 deg, Dec +24.3432 to +35.3120 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5948 to 99.6661 deg, Dec 24.3432 to 35.3120 deg Loaded 17084 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12065 out of 13603 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 13603 out of 27141 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 2.7 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 2.8 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 11.9 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 11.9 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.9 (SNR ) 9.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Lfyldf4yM9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=0, passed=27193 Got 27193 stars (including 24022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Excluding outliers - 4792 stars left (next iteration limit 5270) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4792 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=1002 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.wBEFdNaiG7 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=0, passed=27141 Got 27141 stars (including 23994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4796 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Excluding outliers - 4798 stars left (next iteration limit 5275) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4798 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=1006 n_q2=1396 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1123 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.tAnx0PBAg5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=123, bad_region=0, passed=1879 Got 1879 stars (including 1755 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1879 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1706 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1669 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1652 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1669 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1857 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1706 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1669 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1856 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1669 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1856 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Excluding outliers - 1669 stars left (next iteration limit 1835) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1669 robust_rms=6.174 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=24.131 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1669 robust_rms=0.540 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.729 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1669 robust_rms=0.464 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.607 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1669 robust_rms_before=0.907 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.488 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.464 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.717 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.607 verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits Image size: 942.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 06:00:15.168 +30:00:53.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 1879 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2947509.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.907 -> 0.464 arcsec) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits N_match=1669 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.676 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.556 n_q1=526 n_q2=267 n_q3=707 n_q4=169 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.361 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.LulYFRyH1o (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=124, bad_region=0, passed=1912 Got 1912 stars (including 1785 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1912 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1736 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1699 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1686 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1698 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1736 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1697 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1697 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Excluding outliers - 1697 stars left (next iteration limit 1867) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1697 robust_rms=6.217 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=24.892 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1697 robust_rms=0.546 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.685 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1697 robust_rms=0.460 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.646 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1697 robust_rms_before=0.924 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.521 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.460 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.738 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.646 verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits Image size: 942.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 06:00:15.939 +30:00:13.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 1912 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2947510.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.924 -> 0.460 arcsec) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits N_match=1697 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.652 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.524 n_q1=525 n_q2=287 n_q3=704 n_q4=181 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.354 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.458 worst_q_ratio=1.287 ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.463 worst_q_ratio=1.244 new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits sigma_overall=0.496 worst_q_ratio=1.361 new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits sigma_overall=0.481 worst_q_ratio=1.354 reference average sigma_overall=0.4605 worst_q_ratio=1.2655 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4792 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4798 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008_astrometric_residuals.png (1669 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009_astrometric_residuals.png (1697 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits Last image: 2461250.95133726 29.07.2026 10:49:45.539 UTC WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 AFTER completing the measurements. This is a memory-management crash during cleanup (a VaST bug to report), NOT a wrong field / clouds / bad focus. The lightcurves were written, so the transient search continues. ____ VaST output (crashed during memory cleanup; the measurements above are complete) ____ --==VaST 1.0rc90==-- Parsing command line arguments... opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius! opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching! opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source! opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted! opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope) opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag! WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars. opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done! opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually! opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored! INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ... Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found. This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file. Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U)... OK Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files. Done with cleaning! VaST was started with the following command line: ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits Preparing to process 4 input FITS images... ######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ######## transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search! transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search! transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!! transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3 transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars transient search mode: not discarding large sources ################ Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix We have 4 images to process. SExtractor catalog cache: restored Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits catalog from cache SExtractor catalog cache: restored Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits catalog from cache Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads... Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user Parent process says: we are done fork()ing. Waiting for thread 2 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits The above guess is bsex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1ased on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.0,5.0,4.5,5.5,6.0,6.5 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.9,4.9,4.5,5.4,5.9,6.4 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits Waiting for thread 1 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits Done with SExtractor! TIMING SExtractor: 8 seconds Matching stars between images! No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine. Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-22T02:52:31.3611032 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-22T02:52:31.3611032 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-02-22T02:52:31.361 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits Exposure 20 sec, 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461093.61992316 mid. exp. The reference image star 1153.957 916.599 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 1200.058 1174.577 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 3616.907 1439.272 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 355.093 1873.433 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 727.972 2729.014 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9334.141 3591.093 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 2342.712 4750.533 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 498.805 5915.071 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 500.519 5911.056 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 2862.421 5867.341 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 211682, (211679 good for image matching) * rejected as having no flux measurement: 1 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 79 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 11 * rejected close to frame edge: 1042 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.5 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 13 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied. get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.36 Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.4 (5.0 sigma detection) The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.6 80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.9 Selected detection limit= -7.9 Final detection limit= -7.9 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0) Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.5 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 10 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 211528 * detected, using 499/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.018991, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4020 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=192203 inliers=192203 rms 0.33 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.3 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.019114, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4046 192203 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=192203 inliers=192203 rms 0.31 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.019114, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4046 192203 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=192203 inliers=192203 rms 0.31 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.019114, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4046 192203 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 0.006 211528 stars detected, 192203 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 157812, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 157812 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 157810 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix -0.00244 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 151673 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.36 231007 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 375704 kB used, 405476 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM Total number of measurements 423210 (423210 measurements stored in RAM) sorting the measurements cached in memory, writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-07-29T10:49:45.5398316 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-07-29T10:49:45.5398316 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-07-29T10:49:45.539 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits The star 6852.003 4572.034 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8663.327 5472.408 is rejected, see bad_region.lst SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 18582 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 2 * rejected close to frame edge: 90 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>5.0 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 26 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 18582 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000078, number_of_ambiguous_matches=18 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=18231 inliers=18231 rms 0.99 -> 0.29 pix, max corner correction 6.5 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000074, number_of_ambiguous_matches=17 18277 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=18277 inliers=18277 rms 0.24 -> 0.24 pix, max corner correction 0.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000074, number_of_ambiguous_matches=17 18277 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=18277 inliers=18277 rms 0.24 -> 0.24 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000074, number_of_ambiguous_matches=17 18277 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 178.135 18582 stars detected, 18277 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 11669, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 11669 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 10608 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00013*X_pix -0.00005*Y_pix -0.17768 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 10608 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.74  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  231007 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 484488 kB used, 588704 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-07-29T10:50:32.1179800 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-07-29T10:50:32.1179800 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-07-29T10:50:32.117 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits The star 6852.016 4571.972 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8802.093 4309.051 is rejected, see bad_region.lst SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 18935 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 2 * rejected close to frame edge: 86 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.9 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 29 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 18935 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000065, number_of_ambiguous_matches=15 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=18502 inliers=18502 rms 0.96 -> 0.37 pix, max corner correction 6.4 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000065, number_of_ambiguous_matches=15 18621 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=3 pairs=18621 inliers=18621 rms 0.28 -> 0.24 pix, max corner correction 1.8 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000065, number_of_ambiguous_matches=15 18621 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=18621 inliers=18621 rms 0.24 -> 0.24 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000065, number_of_ambiguous_matches=15 18621 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 178.130 18935 stars detected, 18621 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 11892, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 11892 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 10918 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00013*X_pix -0.00004*Y_pix -0.22352 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 10918 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.72  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  231007 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 484620 kB used, 588704 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%) TIMING matching_and_photometry: 15 seconds Done with measurements! =) Total number of measurements 423210 (0 measurements stored in RAM) Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory... Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory... Creating vast_image_details.log ... Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK Selecting the best aperture for each source Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 36670 stars Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 55134 stars Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 26851 stars Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 24379 stars Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 49169 stars done! =) TIMING select_aperture: 13 seconds Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make' Computing, please wait a bit ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 191257 objects, the longest string is 384 bytes. Allocating memory for resorting the file. Variability index idx00_STD is enabled Variability index idx01_wSTD is enabled Variability index idx08_Npts is enabled Variability index idx09_MAD is enabled Variability index idx11_RoMS is enabled Variability index idx12_rCh2 is enabled Variability index idx17_Jtim is enabled Variability index idx18_Ltim is enabled Variability index idx21_eta is enabled Variability index idx23_S_B is enabled Variability index idx25_IQR is enabled Computing the expected values of variability indexes and their scatter as a function of magnitude .......... .......... .......... .......... Wriring the list of candidate variables to vast_autocandidates.log .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ----***** VaST processing WARNING *****---- You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one. Please investigate this! ************************************************************** This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic messages printed above (or the vast*.log files): * How many of the input images are matched? * Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable? * Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent? You may run ./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings (star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration file, see various examples in the VaST directory). If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/ ************************************************************** Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1) _____________________ SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits Last image: 2461250.95133726 29.07.2026 10:49:45.539 UTC ERROR running VaST on the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 (less than 4 images processed) exp_start= 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461093.61992316 ap= 4.5 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 211682 *matched= 211682 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exp_start= 22.02.2026 02:53:39.580 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461093.62071273 ap= 4.5 rotation= 0.006 *detected= 211528 *matched= 192203 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exp_start= 29.07.2026 10:49:45.539 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461250.95133726 ap= 5.0 rotation= 178.135 *detected= 18582 *matched= 18277 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits exp_start= 29.07.2026 10:50:32.117 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461250.95187635 ap= 4.9 rotation= 178.130 *detected= 18935 *matched= 18621 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055119_TTUQ1b1x1_2909104_QPcBRv9U/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_05-50-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits ########### Completed Aur-06-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461250.95133726 -observatory V36 07:14:01.61 +19:30:55.3 Mercury (0.8mag) 11:27:19.75 +03:44:02.5 Venus (-4.3mag) 05:20:40.48 +23:11:11.0 Mars (1.3mag) 08:34:05.48 +19:13:21.3 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:48.78 +03:20:44.2 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:10:27.76 +20:53:39.0 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:35.06 +00:16:46.6 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:29:05.24 -23:26:15.9 Pluto (14.4mag) 20:25:37.86 -21:58:46.6 Moon (-12.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 29 05:54 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461250.95133726: 08:34:04.65 +19:13:25.8 Io (5.9mag) 08:34:12.99 +19:12:49.7 Europa (6.2mag) 08:33:55.23 +19:14:06.1 Ganymede (5.5mag) 08:34:16.66 +19:12:32.0 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:31:52.77 +19:06:57.7 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:34:09.95 +19:13:02.7 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:31:18.41 +19:07:25.5 Elara (17.7mag) 08:38:05.34 +18:57:33.3 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:37:54.35 +19:21:36.7 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:51.64 +03:20:10.4 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:47.58 +03:20:28.6 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:56:30.91 +03:18:10.0 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:57:03.78 +03:20:40.8 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:23.99 +03:15:14.2 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 29 05:54 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461250.95133726: 18:27:41.55 -27:20:21.8 JWST 17:26:43.24 +36:54:18.5 Chandra 11:29:35.48 -60:48:18.3 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 29 05:54 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461250.95133726 -observatory V36 03:01:59.27 +16:29:46.6 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:05:35.23 -34:38:55.4 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:44:31.10 -68:34:23.7 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:07:03.21 +32:47:40.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:12:17.23 +32:09:00.6 16.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:46:25.88 +31:55:44.9 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:33:27.39 +26:41:56.2 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:12:34.79 +28:54:47.5 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:22:18.75 +05:15:10.8 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:11:17.63 -11:55:42.9 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:24:03.39 +66:54:42.1 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:59:11.65 -12:00:24.4 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 07:56:46.90 +30:54:29.9 15.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:09:03.73 +15:36:39.0 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:15:55.17 +42:17:45.1 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:24:38.78 +48:25:35.5 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:06:59.42 -13:08:18.5 15.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:49:30.12 +25:51:09.0 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:26:09.59 -14:52:32.9 17.4mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:19:41.12 +21:29:26.1 17.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:52:41.08 +02:57:52.2 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:10:21.86 +78:37:37.0 17.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:02:38.33 +45:56:41.1 17.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:38:59.43 +07:25:09.0 17.2mag A/2026 E1 21:46:36.63 -23:00:42.4 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:23:17.57 -02:49:31.7 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:26:43.07 +31:31:20.9 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:47:41.14 +07:50:22.6 17.2mag 63P/Wild 00:53:52.56 -05:10:07.6 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 05:12:59.96 +20:45:08.3 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:49:51.56 +12:51:35.8 16.6mag 88P/Howell 07:30:07.66 +28:52:52.8 16.0mag 93P/Lovas 03:39:34.82 +13:07:07.9 17.9mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 05:24:00.78 +31:04:54.7 16.5mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:55:07.92 +28:12:50.1 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:24:28.35 -06:28:04.0 17.0mag 124P/Mrkos 05:21:49.98 +21:09:49.5 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:11:25.48 +19:18:38.1 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 08:17:26.89 +12:37:24.4 17.8mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:21:35.18 -19:40:29.3 16.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:41:49.37 +37:02:12.9 15.7mag 162P/SidingSpring 17:30:17.00 +31:07:34.6 13.0mag 169P/NEAT 02:23:54.96 +09:11:20.3 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:37:32.23 -09:24:31.8 17.5mag 235P/LINEAR 20:29:36.51 -52:32:15.2 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:53:41.10 +20:54:25.7 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 06:35:38.29 +37:45:43.9 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:07:55.93 +04:11:36.3 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 08:51:57.13 +18:50:38.3 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:21:11.31 +37:35:26.1 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Jul 29 05:54 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Jul 29 05:54 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 29 05:54 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 13:58:22.667 -10:01:33.71 AT 2026ued 2026-02-17.61 21.26 15:56:22.493 +00:22:18.18 AT 2026uec 2026-07-09.29 21.02 15:41:24.747 +34:33:05.62 AT 2026ueb 2026-05-17.34 21.13 09:33:43.753 -02:51:50.08 AT 2026uea 2026-01-13.47 20.96 14:14:47.023 +07:58:39.75 AT 2026udz 2026-02-17.54 20.59 15:12:18.981 -05:15:07.40 AT 2026udy 2026-02-28.62 21.2 03:05:14.394 -22:28:10.52 AT 2026udx 2026-01-08.26 21.76 16:02:17.135 +29:31:10.59 AT 2026udw 2026-04-23.43 21.37 08:37:13.387 -05:39:22.22 AT 2026udv 2026-01-27.42 20.31 15:03:07.347 +26:32:16.54 AT 2026udu 2026-02-27.50 20.45 15:59:28.376 +14:29:00.47 AT 2026udt 2026-02-13.59 21.27 22:43:37.411 +10:08:30.21 AT 2026uds 2026-07-11.59 20.65 17:45:13.110 +14:32:00.54 AT 2026udr 2026-07-11.42 21.41 22:33:47.785 -16:52:48.24 AT 2026udq 2026-07-11.54 21.12 21:29:08.363 +04:26:31.33 AT 2026udp 2026-07-11.48 21.13 15:03:58.202 -05:04:22.07 AT 2026udo 2026-07-11.27 20.37 15:25:01.653 +14:49:40.41 AT 2026udn 2026-07-11.35 20.9 22:22:01.421 -20:45:13.04 AT 2026udm 2026-07-11.56 20.85 15:26:26.200 +14:24:00.82 AT 2026udl 2026-07-11.35 21.78 21:52:33.423 -12:26:26.70 AT 2026udk 2026-06-26.41 21.23 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 29 05:54 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 92 C