Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J052545.76+603843.0,2461250.7963,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J052545.76+603843.0 20260729.2963 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cam-09-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-09-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 674853 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 674853 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits_preview.png'
Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits

renamed 'Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits_preview.png'
Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 499.7824
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 678.0503
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 8602.2111
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 2013.4725
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 8568.1872
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 2003.8702
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 17.2119
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-29T02:06:07.0535722' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-29T07:06:07.0535722' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61250.2959149652 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-29T07:06:16.9551654' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61250.2960295719 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 77.1422983993651 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9994918578611 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.1105555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 23.0988888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.7841060170851 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 08 34' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29533 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29533 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 43.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.92 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 9.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.0004 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/d_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits :)
Spent 0.667903 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/d_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-29T02:06:56.1028044' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-29T07:06:56.1028044' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61250.2964826622 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-29T07:07:06.0054356' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61250.2965972801 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 77.1422982679659 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9994918664406 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.1788888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 23.1719444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.76795473460987 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 08 34' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29533 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29533 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 43.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.92 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 9.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.0004 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/d_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits :)
Spent 0.729115 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/d_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits

fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461250.79603071
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:30.834 +62:00:00.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Image size: 944.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:39.332 +62:00:41.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:30.834 +62:00:00.32
Second-epoch image center 05:08:39.332 +62:00:41.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0201 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Image size: 943.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:37.858 +62:00:08.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:30.834 +62:00:00.32
Second-epoch image center 05:08:37.858 +62:00:08.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0139 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:39.332 +62:00:41.32
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:37.858 +62:00:08.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00944 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xNS1tab7U1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fxmSfNmg7G
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vXACa7W2pY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hmlKwMKtcl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 18487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 57.0234 to 95.6668 deg, Dec +55.2650 to +67.5032 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 57.0234 to 95.6668 deg, Dec 55.2650 to 67.5032 deg
Loaded 14058 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8140 out of 8894 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8894 out of 18487 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.952900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.952900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 18487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 57.0234 to 95.6668 deg, Dec +55.2650 to +67.5032 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 57.0234 to 95.6668 deg, Dec 55.2650 to 67.5032 deg
Loaded 14058 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8140 out of 8894 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8894 out of 18487 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16254 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.5691 to 97.2410 deg, Dec +55.3328 to +67.4144 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.5691 to 97.2410 deg, Dec 55.3328 to 67.4144 deg
Loaded 13960 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8077 out of 8715 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8715 out of 16254 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
2.2 pix Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
15.3 mag. Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
12.3 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
12.3 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.3 (SNR ) 10.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xNS1tab7U1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1596, bad_region=0, passed=18487
Got 18487 stars (including 16865 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5375)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=1207 n_q2=1174 n_q3=1244 n_q4=1261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fxmSfNmg7G (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1367, bad_region=0, passed=16254
Got 16254 stars (including 14863 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1167 n_q2=1246 n_q3=1135 n_q4=1350 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vXACa7W2pY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=175, bad_region=0, passed=1909
Got 1909 stars (including 1731 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1909 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1673 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1663 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1663 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1673 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1661 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1661 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 1661 stars left (next iteration limit 1829)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1661 robust_rms=7.924 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.922 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1661 robust_rms=0.521 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.724 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1661 robust_rms=0.437 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.565 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1661 robust_rms_before=1.306 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.465 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.437 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.577 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.565
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.577 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits N_match=1661 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.456 n_q1=529 n_q2=268 n_q3=493 n_q4=371 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hmlKwMKtcl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=175, bad_region=0, passed=1923
Got 1923 stars (including 1744 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1923 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013110 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010488 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1691 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1680 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1680 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1692 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1679 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1679 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 1679 stars left (next iteration limit 1848)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1679 robust_rms=7.768 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.305 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1679 robust_rms=0.523 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.658 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1679 robust_rms=0.436 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.583 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1679 robust_rms_before=1.390 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.486 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.436 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.577 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.583
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.577 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits N_match=1679 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.477 n_q1=540 n_q2=279 n_q3=489 n_q4=371 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.264
ref2=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.228
new1=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits sigma_overall=0.475 worst_q_ratio=1.271
new2=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits sigma_overall=0.500 worst_q_ratio=1.149
reference average sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.246
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296_astrometric_residuals.png (1661 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297_astrometric_residuals.png (1679 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:30.834 +62:00:00.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Image size: 944.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:39.332 +62:00:41.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:30.834 +62:00:00.32
Second-epoch image center 05:08:39.332 +62:00:41.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0201 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Image size: 943.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:37.858 +62:00:08.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:30.834 +62:00:00.32
Second-epoch image center 05:08:37.858 +62:00:08.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0139 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:39.332 +62:00:41.32
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:37.858 +62:00:08.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00944 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Gw5NEag1aL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z05lcld4nK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pfE4Xrg8vR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m87PJHPk2s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 130560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.9473 to 95.7081 deg, Dec +55.1950 to +67.5042 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.9473 to 95.7081 deg, Dec 55.1950 to 67.5042 deg
Loaded 14177 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6855 out of 9006 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9006 out of 130560 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.827400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.827400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 130560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.9473 to 95.7081 deg, Dec +55.1950 to +67.5042 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.9473 to 95.7081 deg, Dec 55.1950 to 67.5042 deg
Loaded 14177 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6855 out of 9006 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9006 out of 130560 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 116096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3092 to 97.2410 deg, Dec +55.3262 to +67.4190 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3092 to 97.2410 deg, Dec 55.3262 to 67.4190 deg
Loaded 14060 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6958 out of 8920 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8920 out of 116096 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 25 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
2.0 pix Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.8 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Gw5NEag1aL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=12449, bad_region=5, passed=130527
Got 130527 stars (including 117842 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 130527 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1188 n_q2=1191 n_q3=1244 n_q4=1275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Z05lcld4nK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=37, blended=10467, bad_region=1, passed=116059
Got 116059 stars (including 105386 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 116059 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=1128 n_q2=1232 n_q3=1174 n_q4=1369 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pfE4Xrg8vR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=469, bad_region=1, passed=17394
Got 17394 stars (including 16906 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17394 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.491 n_q1=1485 n_q2=782 n_q3=1468 n_q4=1129 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.m87PJHPk2s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=418, bad_region=1, passed=17457
Got 17457 stars (including 17002 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17457 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013110 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010488 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4863 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits N_match=4863 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.477 n_q1=1502 n_q2=781 n_q3=1460 n_q4=1120 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:38:34.67 +58:39:10.8: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:33:53.16 +66:21:25.7: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 04:38:34.67 +58:39:10.8: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 05:33:53.16 +66:21:25.7: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:34.67 +58:39:10.8: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7290 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:53.16 +66:21:25.7: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1344 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:25:45.88 +60:38:42.9: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-40-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 05:25:45.88 +60:38:42.9: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:25:45.88 +60:38:42.9: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0271 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47504.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156130_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 156130_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 10.82 | 04:40:16.99 +66:08:06.3 | 2928 5687 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 04:40:16.94 +66:08:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156146_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 156146_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 10.98 | 05:06:21.15 +58:57:52.9 | 4707 1361 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 05:06:21.15 +58:57:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156176_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 156176_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 29.29603 | 2461250.79603 | 11.73 | 04:38:34.76 +58:39:10.7 | 2535 1178 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 11.73 | 04:38:34.58 +58:39:10.9 | 2536 1184 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156180_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 156180_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 11.94 | 04:53:36.66 +66:00:34.1 | 3742 5584 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 04:53:36.41 +66:00:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156190_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 156190_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 11.82 | 05:05:12.24 +64:37:26.6 | 4486 4760 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 05:05:12.42 +64:37:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156193_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 156193_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 11.70 | 05:50:30.83 +64:55:01.3 | 7351 5316 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 05:50:30.84 +64:55:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156194_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 156194_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 11.81 | 04:53:28.56 +61:26:59.7 | 3718 2836 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 04:53:28.54 +61:27:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156216_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 156216_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 12.32 | 04:50:15.34 +66:32:29.8 | 3542 5909 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 04:50:15.60 +66:32:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156224_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 156224_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 29.29603 | 2461250.79603 | 12.16 | 05:33:52.99 +66:21:26.7 | 6171 5972 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 12.11 | 05:33:53.33 +66:21:24.7 | 6173 5978 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156232_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 156232_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 12.22 | 05:03:11.60 +60:28:13.3 | 4434 2258 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 05:03:11.68 +60:28:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156237_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 156237_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 12.40 | 05:13:17.16 +62:42:03.6 | 5087 3635 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 05:13:17.08 +62:42:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110964_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 110964_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 10.37 | 05:30:42.42 +65:12:40.2 | 6076 5262 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 05:30:42.43 +65:12:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44316_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 44316_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 11.59 | 04:40:17.11 +59:35:05.5 | 2704 1739 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 04:40:17.15 +59:35:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28092_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 28092_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 12.35 | 04:40:58.31 +58:17:09.8 | 2712 0952 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 04:40:58.30 +58:17:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18969_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 18969_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 11.83 | 04:36:33.55 +57:24:05.3 | 2322 0435 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 04:36:33.60 +57:24:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35506_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 35506_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 11.90 | 04:46:31.03 +59:02:43.9 | 3168 1395 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 04:46:31.04 +59:02:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114217_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 114217_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 11.29 | 04:43:35.64 +64:19:05.3 | 3083 4578 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43233_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 43233_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 11.83 | 04:14:56.08 +58:31:14.6 | 0661 1291 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 04:14:55.85 +58:31:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123674_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 123674_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 11.90 | 05:14:38.37 +64:06:23.5 | 5117 4485 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 05:14:38.33 +64:06:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81241_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 81241_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 11.40 | 04:35:17.50 +62:16:23.7 | 2447 3381 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 04:35:17.49 +62:16:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47504_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
Preparing report for the candidate 47504_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18486_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 18486_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 11.42 | 05:50:35.86 +58:24:21.0 | 8188 1476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69964_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 69964_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 11.64 | 05:10:46.35 +62:14:02.4 | 4931 3343 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 05:10:46.22 +62:14:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29402_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 29402_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 11.02 | 04:19:08.86 +57:38:26.8 | 0919 0713 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 04:19:08.75 +57:38:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25230_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 25230_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 29.29660 | 2461250.79660 | 10.49 | 04:53:56.18 +58:27:13.7 | 3742 1030 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-29_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_033411_TTUQ1b1x1_2442792_fNUxLMGv/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-29_02-06-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 04:53:56.18 +58:27:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:25:45.88 +60:38:42.9
########### Completed Cam-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
05:25:45.88 +60:38:42.9
###################################################################################
05:25:45.88 +60:38:42.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
05:25:45.88 +60:38:42.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
05:25:45.88 +60:38:42.9 -- a known variable star
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
05:25:45.88 +60:38:42.9
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461250.79603071 -observatory V36
07:13:38.85 +19:29:12.1 Mercury (0.8mag)
11:26:44.36 +03:48:35.3 Venus (-4.2mag)
05:20:12.98 +23:10:36.3 Mars (1.3mag)
08:33:56.93 +19:13:51.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:48.90 +03:20:47.5 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:10:26.40 +20:53:35.3 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:35.45 +00:16:49.5 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:29:06.17 -23:26:12.0 Pluto (14.4mag)
20:20:29.49 -22:42:56.6 Moon (-12.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 29 07:30 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461250.79603071:
08:33:53.36 +19:14:06.4 Io (5.9mag)
08:34:06.32 +19:13:11.7 Europa (6.2mag)
08:33:45.33 +19:14:41.0 Ganymede (5.5mag)
08:34:09.61 +19:12:55.7 Callisto (6.7mag)
08:31:44.49 +19:07:22.1 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:33:57.57 +19:13:48.0 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:31:10.04 +19:07:51.8 Elara (17.7mag)
08:37:56.63 +18:58:07.7 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:37:46.39 +19:22:04.6 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:51.01 +03:20:13.8 Titan (8.5mag)
00:56:46.59 +03:20:33.5 Rhea (9.8mag)
00:56:30.66 +03:18:12.8 Iapetus (11.2mag)
00:57:04.09 +03:20:42.6 Hyperion (14.5mag)
00:56:24.32 +03:15:18.7 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 29 07:30 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461250.79603071:
18:27:35.88 -27:28:11.7 JWST
17:12:56.66 +41:09:28.9 Chandra
09:52:16.23 -55:32:36.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 29 07:30 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461250.79603071 -observatory V36
03:01:47.63 +16:28:51.9 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:05:39.86 -34:38:55.2 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:44:22.05 -68:34:06.6 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:07:00.39 +32:47:29.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:11:45.17 +32:02:10.3 16.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:46:33.11 +31:56:06.1 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:33:17.51 +26:42:04.0 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:12:26.21 +28:55:13.0 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:22:12.47 +05:15:06.5 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:11:16.91 -11:55:24.2 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:24:16.49 +66:55:22.7 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:59:24.00 -11:59:30.6 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
07:56:35.69 +30:54:04.3 15.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:09:06.24 +15:36:37.0 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:16:07.82 +42:16:47.5 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:24:51.59 +48:24:41.0 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:06:51.36 -13:08:31.1 15.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:49:23.30 +25:52:44.2 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:26:04.55 -14:51:25.0 17.4mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:19:28.77 +21:29:57.7 17.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:52:36.24 +02:58:25.3 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:10:33.80 +78:38:16.6 17.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:02:32.57 +45:56:23.2 17.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:38:52.12 +07:23:58.9 17.2mag A/2026 E1
21:46:25.78 -22:56:31.8 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:23:12.29 -02:49:00.7 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:26:30.73 +31:30:25.5 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:47:21.81 +07:53:25.3 17.2mag 63P/Wild
00:53:51.51 -05:09:56.0 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
05:12:38.10 +20:45:03.6 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
02:49:40.15 +12:50:41.2 16.5mag 88P/Howell
07:29:42.20 +28:53:55.3 16.0mag 93P/Lovas
03:39:10.04 +13:03:35.0 17.9mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
05:23:29.68 +31:05:21.9 16.5mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
08:54:45.33 +28:14:13.6 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:24:10.03 -06:24:24.2 17.0mag 124P/Mrkos
05:21:35.65 +21:09:44.7 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:11:08.78 +19:18:57.0 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
08:16:58.74 +12:39:38.0 17.8mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:21:34.94 -19:40:59.7 16.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
06:41:16.02 +37:01:12.3 15.7mag 162P/SidingSpring
17:31:42.95 +30:57:28.0 13.0mag 169P/NEAT
02:23:35.88 +09:10:51.1 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:37:29.38 -09:23:55.7 17.5mag 235P/LINEAR
20:29:44.61 -52:31:35.7 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
02:53:14.30 +20:50:13.1 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
06:35:09.65 +37:45:35.2 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:07:54.07 +04:12:35.2 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski
08:51:48.54 +18:51:04.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
08:20:57.21 +37:36:14.2 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Jul 29 07:30 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Jul 29 07:30 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 29 07:30 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
13:58:22.667 -10:01:33.71 AT 2026ued 2026-02-17.61 21.26
15:56:22.493 +00:22:18.18 AT 2026uec 2026-07-09.29 21.02
15:41:24.747 +34:33:05.62 AT 2026ueb 2026-05-17.34 21.13
09:33:43.753 -02:51:50.08 AT 2026uea 2026-01-13.47 20.96
14:14:47.023 +07:58:39.75 AT 2026udz 2026-02-17.54 20.59
15:12:18.981 -05:15:07.40 AT 2026udy 2026-02-28.62 21.2
03:05:14.394 -22:28:10.52 AT 2026udx 2026-01-08.26 21.76
16:02:17.135 +29:31:10.59 AT 2026udw 2026-04-23.43 21.37
08:37:13.387 -05:39:22.22 AT 2026udv 2026-01-27.42 20.31
15:03:07.347 +26:32:16.54 AT 2026udu 2026-02-27.50 20.45
15:59:28.376 +14:29:00.47 AT 2026udt 2026-02-13.59 21.27
22:43:37.411 +10:08:30.21 AT 2026uds 2026-07-11.59 20.65
17:45:13.110 +14:32:00.54 AT 2026udr 2026-07-11.42 21.41
22:33:47.785 -16:52:48.24 AT 2026udq 2026-07-11.54 21.12
21:29:08.363 +04:26:31.33 AT 2026udp 2026-07-11.48 21.13
15:03:58.202 -05:04:22.07 AT 2026udo 2026-07-11.27 20.37
15:25:01.653 +14:49:40.41 AT 2026udn 2026-07-11.35 20.9
22:22:01.421 -20:45:13.04 AT 2026udm 2026-07-11.56 20.85
15:26:26.200 +14:24:00.82 AT 2026udl 2026-07-11.35 21.78
21:52:33.423 -12:26:26.70 AT 2026udk 2026-06-26.41 21.23
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 29 07:30 tns_transients_list.txt