This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4295 2461249.9295 12.42 05:55:41.62 +31:27:40.1
178.94329 3.16164 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX21" Gaia DR3 3450136787814781696
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.540 G 12.580 G 0.023469300000 A
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina -1 -0 1 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:55:41.62 +31:27:40.1: 14.95 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:55:41.62 +31:27:40.1: 14.80 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3450136787814781696,2461249.9295,12.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3450136787814781696 20260728.4295 12.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4295 2461249.9295 13.14 05:59:37.62 +31:28:43.6
179.34634 3.89778 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.141 Lumen -0 -0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:59:37.62 +31:28:43.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:37.62 +31:28:43.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.9295,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.4295 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4295 2461249.9295 10.44 06:08:45.03 +25:51:18.3
185.24093 2.89691 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V0379 Gem
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.300 V 12.400 V 2452810.70000 149.000000000000 M5III
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:08:45.03 +25:51:18.3: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:45.03 +25:51:18.3: 11.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.36 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0379 Gem,2461249.9295,10.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0379 Gem 20260728.4295 10.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4295 2461249.9295 11.64 06:03:42.03 +33:31:12.6
177.98140 5.64557 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia 0 -0 1 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:03:42.03 +33:31:12.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:42.03 +33:31:12.6: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.9295,11.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.4295 11.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4295 2461249.9295 13.13 05:45:01.59 +30:45:32.8
178.37742 0.84089 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 5.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0545015+304537
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.232 R1 Y 1.138 R1 314.000000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:45:01.59 +30:45:32.8: 14.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:45:01.59 +30:45:32.8: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0545015+304537,2461249.9295,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0545015+304537 20260728.4295 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4295 2461249.9295 12.76 06:14:36.53 +27:56:00.2
184.03495 5.03650 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J061436.49+275600.8
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.360 V 14.680 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:14:36.53 +27:56:00.2: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:36.53 +27:56:00.2: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J061436.49+275600.8,2461249.9295,12.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J061436.49+275600.8 20260728.4295 12.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461249.92989162 28.07.2026 10:18:52.636 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25218
Objects passed selection criteria: 25061
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16737
Average stars matched: 16222.8 (96.9275 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 250560 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 28 02:13:30 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-182-g8380f0ac
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-28)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 28 05:42:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461249.92989162 28.07.2026 10:18:52.636 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 142
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 48 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 193301
Objects passed selection criteria: 192737
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 133397
Average stars matched: 128216 (96.1161 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 654240 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 28 02:13:30 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-182-g8380f0ac
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-28)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 28 05:58:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461249.92915178
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:52.591 +30:01:58.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 05:59:52.591 +30:01:58.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0451 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.8' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:53.710 +30:01:26.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 05:59:53.710 +30:01:26.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0358 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:52.591 +30:01:58.14
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:53.710 +30:01:26.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00972 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k16kmExzo4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qBzkK9X1e1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eEgLPKn2nu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s3CkC0vRwE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec +24.3425 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec 24.3425 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17091 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11926 out of 13489 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13489 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec +24.3425 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec 24.3425 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17091 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11926 out of 13489 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13489 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5948 to 99.6661 deg, Dec +24.3432 to +35.3120 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5948 to 99.6661 deg, Dec 24.3432 to 35.3120 deg
Loaded 17084 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12065 out of 13603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13603 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.k16kmExzo4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=0, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 24022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4792 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4792 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=1002 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qBzkK9X1e1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=0, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 23994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4796 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4798 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4798 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=1006 n_q2=1396 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1123 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eEgLPKn2nu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=423, bad_region=0, passed=6508
Got 6508 stars (including 6073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6508 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5276)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=8.634 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.297 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=0.579 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.172 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=0.405 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.544 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4797 robust_rms_before=1.432 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.443 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.405 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.565 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.544
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.565 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=1116 n_q2=1114 n_q3=1459 n_q4=1108 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.349
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.s3CkC0vRwE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, bad_region=0, passed=6569
Got 6569 stars (including 6184 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6569 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4798 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4798 robust_rms=8.954 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.300 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4798 robust_rms=0.540 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.995 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4798 robust_rms=0.402 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.531 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4798 robust_rms_before=1.418 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.434 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.402 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.551 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.531
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.551 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits N_match=4798 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=1110 n_q2=1130 n_q3=1450 n_q4=1108 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.327
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.458 worst_q_ratio=1.287
ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.463 worst_q_ratio=1.244
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits sigma_overall=0.442 worst_q_ratio=1.349
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.327
reference average sigma_overall=0.4605 worst_q_ratio=1.2655
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4792 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4798 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438_astrometric_residuals.png (4797 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439_astrometric_residuals.png (4798 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18816_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 18816_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.26 +27:29:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.08 +28:29:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.69 +31:24:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.03 +31:35:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:52.591 +30:01:58.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 05:59:52.591 +30:01:58.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0451 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.8' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:53.710 +30:01:26.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 05:59:53.710 +30:01:26.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0358 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:52.591 +30:01:58.14
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:53.710 +30:01:26.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00972 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pH95168AxH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MtSnEJLaBF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qxajgubSHQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KPidGrBonG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17188 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9142 out of 14161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14161 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17188 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9142 out of 14161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14161 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec +24.3258 to +35.3145 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec 24.3258 to 35.3145 deg
Loaded 17176 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9258 out of 14259 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14259 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 126 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pH95168AxH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=79, blended=32424, bad_region=1, passed=212748
Got 212748 stars (including 179989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1028 n_q2=1362 n_q3=1243 n_q4=1133 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MtSnEJLaBF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=32176, bad_region=4, passed=212590
Got 212590 stars (including 180083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4806 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=1026 n_q2=1364 n_q3=1217 n_q4=1159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qxajgubSHQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2663, bad_region=3, passed=55487
Got 55487 stars (including 52738 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.400 n_q1=1114 n_q2=1092 n_q3=1487 n_q4=1104 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.329
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KPidGrBonG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2365, bad_region=3, passed=55736
Got 55736 stars (including 53283 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55736 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4795 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits N_match=4795 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=1122 n_q2=1108 n_q3=1461 n_q4=1104 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.342
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-17-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_053823_TTUQ1b1x1_1438456_Loogkktd/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:53:58.61 +31:53:07.3: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:06:42.54 +26:17:03.3: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:53:50.67 +31:20:02.1: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:36:11.56 +31:54:34.3: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:17.05 +32:29:54.7: 12.79 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:54:05.37 +28:36:32.3: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:31:29.00 +34:51:23.1: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:53:50.67 +31:20:02.1: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:54:05.37 +28:36:32.3: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:17.05 +32:29:54.7: 12.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:53:58.61 +31:53:07.3: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:50.67 +31:20:02.1: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2902 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:36:11.56 +31:54:34.3: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:42.54 +26:17:03.3: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:05.37 +28:36:32.3: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2469 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:17.05 +32:29:54.7: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.7263 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:58.61 +31:53:07.3: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0237 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:11.56 +31:54:34.3: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6655 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:31:29.00 +34:51:23.1: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:42.54 +26:17:03.3: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5240 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:29.00 +34:51:23.1: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5098 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:27:29.91 +29:01:22.0: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:22.12 +32:31:06.4: 11.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:27:29.91 +29:01:22.0: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:29.91 +29:01:22.0: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1172 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:37:11.34 +34:48:46.1: 10.02 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:20.32 +32:33:47.5: 11.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:22.12 +32:31:06.4: 11.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:22.12 +32:31:06.4: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.5018 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:37:11.34 +34:48:46.1: 10.01 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.02 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:11.34 +34:48:46.1: ref_mag=10.02 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5185 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:20.32 +32:33:47.5: 11.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:20.32 +32:33:47.5: ref_mag=11.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1602 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:24.08 +32:33:19.7: 12.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:55:41.62 +31:27:40.1: 14.95 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:23:36.50 +24:29:48.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:24.08 +32:33:19.7: 12.37 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:24.08 +32:33:19.7: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.1850 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:55:41.62 +31:27:40.1: 14.80 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:55:41.62 +31:27:40.1: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.4047 delta=2.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:14:01.51 +33:16:05.5: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:40:56.77 +28:06:36.3: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:50.12 +34:31:03.6: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:36.50 +24:29:48.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:36.50 +24:29:48.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:01:20.81 +32:38:55.7: 12.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:01.51 +33:16:05.5: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:01.51 +33:16:05.5: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5154 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:40:56.77 +28:06:36.3: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:08:19.91 +30:15:46.1: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:56.77 +28:06:36.3: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3390 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:50.12 +34:31:03.6: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:50.12 +34:31:03.6: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6636 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:06:15.99 +32:18:06.4: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:20.81 +32:38:55.7: 12.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:20.81 +32:38:55.7: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6762 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:19.91 +30:15:46.1: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:19.91 +30:15:46.1: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5899 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:20.97 +30:53:54.5: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:15.99 +32:18:06.4: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:15.99 +32:18:06.4: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6658 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:03:07.47 +31:03:51.3: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:20.97 +30:53:54.5: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:20.97 +30:53:54.5: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7538 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:38:48.10 +35:04:24.9: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:03:10.81 +31:26:19.4: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:07.47 +31:03:51.3: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:07.47 +31:03:51.3: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6571 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:38:48.10 +35:04:24.9: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:48.10 +35:04:24.9: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9140 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:10.81 +31:26:19.4: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:10.81 +31:26:19.4: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7451 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:59:37.62 +31:28:43.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:01:27.14 +29:36:14.0: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:37.62 +31:28:43.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:27.14 +29:36:14.0: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:27.14 +29:36:14.0: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2013 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:08:45.03 +25:51:18.3: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:45.03 +25:51:18.3: 11.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.36 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:08:45.03 +25:51:18.3: ref_mag=11.36 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4398 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:03:42.03 +33:31:12.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:42.03 +33:31:12.6: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:45:01.59 +30:45:32.8: 14.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:45:01.59 +30:45:32.8: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:45:01.59 +30:45:32.8: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1344 delta=1.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:14:36.53 +27:56:00.2: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:36.53 +27:56:00.2: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:14:36.53 +27:56:00.2: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7616 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out146772.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out173004.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242719.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243329.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31910.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out89530.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242156_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242156_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242175_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242175_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:18.73 +34:55:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242190_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242190_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242196_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242196_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242199_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242199_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242205_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242205_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:46.82 +30:46:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242213_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242213_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:59.68 +34:57:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242215_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242215_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242216_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242216_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242220_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242220_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:57.06 +33:47:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242222_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242222_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:00.86 +27:35:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242223_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242223_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:54.19 +25:28:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242225_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242225_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242228_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242228_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:20.54 +35:01:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242230_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242230_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.22 +32:30:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242231_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242231_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:19.89 +32:31:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242232_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242232_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242233_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242233_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:14.58 +32:34:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242234_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242234_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.11 +32:31:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242235_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242235_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242236_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242236_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242237_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242237_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242434_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242434_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.29 +32:03:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242438_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242438_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.50 +34:26:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242460_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242460_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.69 +28:29:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242476_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242476_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.43 +27:56:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242509_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242509_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:16.26 +32:35:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242525_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242525_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.57 +27:35:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242532_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242532_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:09.85 +34:55:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242601_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242601_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:17.76 +30:10:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242617_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242617_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:10.53 +32:41:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242624_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242624_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242630_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242630_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.80 +34:23:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242646_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242646_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.28 +28:37:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242650_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242650_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.14 +30:28:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242666_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242666_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.88 +25:55:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242719_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 242719_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242720_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242720_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:11.76 +32:30:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242738_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242738_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:23.38 +28:38:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242760_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242760_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242763_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242763_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:34.03 +33:00:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242782_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242782_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:15.55 +31:22:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242785_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242785_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:03.62 +26:04:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242787_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242787_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:59.60 +26:00:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242790_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242790_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242795_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242795_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.67 +30:30:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242800_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242800_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:23.42 +31:49:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242820_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242820_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242841_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242841_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:05.60 +32:31:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242912_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242912_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:57.00 +26:41:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242913_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242913_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.97 +25:05:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242923_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242923_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242927_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242927_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:15.14 +34:48:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242934_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242934_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242951_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242951_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:19.40 +31:39:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242959_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242959_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242963_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242963_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:18.85 +29:32:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242990_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242990_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:41.73 +34:15:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242991_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242991_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:12.01 +29:29:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242996_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242996_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243009_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243009_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:54.98 +32:52:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243029_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243029_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:32.04 +27:49:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243045_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243045_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243066_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243066_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:48.60 +31:10:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243085_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243085_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:09.81 +24:55:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243102_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243102_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243112_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243112_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:24.55 +28:37:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243116_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243116_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243131_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243131_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:55.29 +28:47:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243184_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243184_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:16.62 +32:45:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243203_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243203_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:32.52 +30:42:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243242_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243242_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:53.24 +28:27:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243259_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243259_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.74 +30:30:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243275_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243275_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:15.17 +32:06:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243277_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243277_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:49.10 +32:38:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243278_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243278_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.82 +31:57:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243309_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243309_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:38.04 +33:49:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243329_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 243329_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243361_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243361_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243363_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243363_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:13.53 +32:04:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.69 +31:24:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173004_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 173004_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.26 +27:29:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 66618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:31.60 +31:56:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:32.99 +29:09:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 209789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:00.48 +25:17:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:20.98 +28:36:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169250_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 169250_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:04.54 +25:40:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87651_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 87651_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:42.36 +30:33:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168593_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 168593_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:18.17 +25:36:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:28.45 +27:23:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:30.88 +31:25:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34292_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 34292_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:25.29 +33:26:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:14.83 +32:22:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31910_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 31910_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.58 +25:40:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08724_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 08724_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:23.35 +34:45:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.18 +27:36:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103415_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 103415_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 111257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:50.14 +29:24:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:40.01 +28:00:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119656_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 119656_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:50.55 +29:13:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 153284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:15.14 +27:47:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:47.45 +29:32:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113818_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 113818_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:37.25 +29:27:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:40.04 +32:01:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:22.84 +34:38:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.64 +29:51:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:11.38 +33:40:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:48.35 +30:50:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.06 +28:29:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 210727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:43.39 +25:12:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:00.30 +32:13:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:56.74 +30:53:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:12.71 +30:56:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 167008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:33.85 +25:26:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:54.22 +27:45:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09876_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 09876_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:50.36 +34:41:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:52.11 +29:02:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:03.09 +32:03:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.84 +25:25:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-18-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
