This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4321 2461249.9321 9.16 20:07:27.77 -05:08:14.2
37.07500 -19.23896 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3 Juno 1 -0 1 9.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:07:27.77 -05:08:14.2: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:07:27.77 -05:08:14.2: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.9321,9.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.4321 9.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4321 2461249.9321 10.98 20:43:37.76 -13:26:38.0
33.03981 -30.86561 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.287 Nephthys -0 0 0 10.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:43:37.76 -13:26:38.0: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:43:37.76 -13:26:38.0: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.9321,10.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.4321 10.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4321 2461249.9321 12.84 20:59:13.21 -06:36:33.7
42.17858 -31.34958 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.490 Veritas 0 -0 0 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:59:13.21 -06:36:33.7: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:59:13.21 -06:36:33.7: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.9321,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.4321 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4321 2461249.9321 12.88 20:26:22.03 -10:28:27.8
34.11962 -25.79264 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1058 Grubba -2 -1 2 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:26:22.03 -10:28:27.8: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:26:22.03 -10:28:27.8: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 28.4321* 20 26 22.03 -10 28 27.8 12.9 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.9321,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.4321 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4321 2461249.9321 12.88 20:33:42.18 -05:38:49.3
39.80787 -25.28260 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" CH Aql
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.690 V 14.030 V 2451382.79000 0.389187900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:33:42.18 -05:38:49.3: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:33:42.18 -05:38:49.3: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CH Aql,2461249.9321,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CH Aql 20260728.4321 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461212.87205516 21.06.2026 08:55:35.566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
First image: 2461212.87205516 21.06.2026 08:55:35.566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Last image: 2461249.93240753 28.07.2026 10:22:30.011 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.85
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11524
Objects passed selection criteria: 11474
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8422.5
Average stars matched: 8203 (97.3939 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237224 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 28 02:13:30 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-182-g8380f0ac
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-28)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 28 06:13:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461212.87205516 21.06.2026 08:55:35.566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
First image: 2461212.87205516 21.06.2026 08:55:35.566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Last image: 2461249.93240753 28.07.2026 10:22:30.011 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 95
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 35 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 82450
Objects passed selection criteria: 82270
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 67614.8
Average stars matched: 65235.5 (96.4812 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 569640 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 28 02:13:30 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-182-g8380f0ac
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-28)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 28 06:18:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461249.93186749
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits'
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:12.147 -10:03:49.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49
Second-epoch image center 20:34:12.147 -10:03:49.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0550 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:10.036 -10:03:26.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49
Second-epoch image center 20:34:10.036 -10:03:26.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0537 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:12.147 -10:03:49.27
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:10.036 -10:03:26.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01078 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w5A89HO2bP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uP9idIMh8u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JtiFVmZJBn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BwpILj6FpJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 12091 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5231 to 316.6565 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5231 to 316.6565 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Loaded 9282 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7429 out of 7730 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7730 out of 12091 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.678300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.678300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.85
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 12091 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5231 to 316.6565 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5231 to 316.6565 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Loaded 9282 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7429 out of 7730 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7730 out of 12091 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 12080 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5231 to 316.6568 deg, Dec -15.2795 to -4.7122 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5231 to 316.6568 deg, Dec -15.2795 to -4.7122 deg
Loaded 9282 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7444 out of 7741 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7741 out of 12080 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
2.3 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
14.8 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.w5A89HO2bP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=754, bad_region=0, passed=12091
Got 12091 stars (including 11329 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12091 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5375)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.502 n_q1=1247 n_q2=1127 n_q3=1328 n_q4=1184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uP9idIMh8u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=738, bad_region=0, passed=12078
Got 12078 stars (including 11331 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12078 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.511 n_q1=1237 n_q2=1128 n_q3=1332 n_q4=1189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JtiFVmZJBn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=399, bad_region=0, passed=4868
Got 4868 stars (including 4466 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4868 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4378 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4353 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4353 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4379 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4353 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4353 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4353 stars left (next iteration limit 4788)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4353 robust_rms=11.601 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.488 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4353 robust_rms=0.480 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.504 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4353 robust_rms=0.364 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4353 robust_rms_before=0.833 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.355 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.364 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.398 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.400
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.398 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits N_match=4353 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=1041 n_q2=1186 n_q3=1022 n_q4=1104 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BwpILj6FpJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=404, bad_region=0, passed=4855
Got 4855 stars (including 4445 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4855 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4354 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4331 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4331 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4355 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4333 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4333 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4333 stars left (next iteration limit 4764)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4333 robust_rms=11.862 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.424 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4333 robust_rms=0.492 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.522 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4333 robust_rms=0.379 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.420 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4333 robust_rms_before=0.860 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.379 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.409 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.420
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.409 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits N_match=4333 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=1022 n_q2=1181 n_q3=1032 n_q4=1098 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.053
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits sigma_overall=0.446 worst_q_ratio=1.245
ref2=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits sigma_overall=0.455 worst_q_ratio=1.267
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.104
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.053
reference average sigma_overall=0.4505 worst_q_ratio=1.256
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442_astrometric_residuals.png (4353 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443_astrometric_residuals.png (4333 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:07:27.77 -05:08:14.2: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:17:58.89 -06:08:59.6: 10.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:07:27.77 -05:08:14.2: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:17:58.89 -06:08:59.6: 10.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.98 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:58.89 -06:08:59.6: ref_mag=10.98 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3207 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20694.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20664_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 20664_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20694_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
Preparing report for the candidate 20694_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20769_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 20769_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.62 -06:36:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03870_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 03870_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:58.10 -11:49:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:07:27.77 -05:08:14.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:12.147 -10:03:49.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49
Second-epoch image center 20:34:12.147 -10:03:49.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0550 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:10.036 -10:03:26.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49
Second-epoch image center 20:34:10.036 -10:03:26.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0537 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:12.147 -10:03:49.27
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:10.036 -10:03:26.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01078 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BwQol1oori
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits &> /tmp/tmp.acf0jDuNWT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ar4Xzn2GAw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f3omXNedyi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 89020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5072 to 316.6698 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5072 to 316.6698 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6939 deg
Loaded 9320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7242 out of 8299 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8299 out of 89020 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.535200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.535200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 89020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5072 to 316.6698 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5072 to 316.6698 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6939 deg
Loaded 9320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7242 out of 8299 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8299 out of 89020 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 89001 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5106 to 316.6659 deg, Dec -15.2795 to -4.6943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5106 to 316.6659 deg, Dec -15.2795 to -4.6943 deg
Loaded 9310 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7209 out of 8288 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8288 out of 89001 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 88 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
2.1 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
1.9 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
1.9 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
15.0 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BwQol1oori (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=5830, bad_region=0, passed=88997
Got 88997 stars (including 83049 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.499 n_q1=1281 n_q2=1101 n_q3=1280 n_q4=1226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.acf0jDuNWT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=5864, bad_region=0, passed=88980
Got 88980 stars (including 83007 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88980 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88980 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88980 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88980 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.506 n_q1=1282 n_q2=1105 n_q3=1275 n_q4=1227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ar4Xzn2GAw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1516, bad_region=3, passed=46931
Got 46931 stars (including 45338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46931 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=1232 n_q2=1349 n_q3=1118 n_q4=1178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.f3omXNedyi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1569, bad_region=3, passed=47276
Got 47276 stars (including 45616 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47276 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1224 n_q2=1356 n_q3=1114 n_q4=1186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.110
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-21-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0442.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_052622_TTUQ1b1x1_984240_9EfzBiwv/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:27:23.17 -05:12:38.9: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:56:15.47 -05:35:47.9: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:34:09.71 -06:56:07.3: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:17:37.89 -05:01:22.0: 13.49 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:04:07.08 -11:46:42.9: 13.78 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:43:52.44 -09:43:10.5: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:25:14.94 -05:04:17.2: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:40:03.01 -08:19:31.5: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:09:23.50 -05:23:28.5: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:31:59.64 -13:29:36.8: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:34:09.71 -06:56:07.3: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:09:23.50 -05:23:28.5: 12.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:09.71 -06:56:07.3: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8527 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:25:14.94 -05:04:17.2: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:17:37.89 -05:01:22.0: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:43:52.44 -09:43:10.5: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:27:23.17 -05:12:38.9: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:23.50 -05:23:28.5: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1723 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:40:03.01 -08:19:31.5: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:56:15.47 -05:35:47.9: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:31:59.64 -13:29:36.8: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:14.94 -05:04:17.2: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5082 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:37.89 -05:01:22.0: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5233 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:04:07.08 -11:46:42.9: 13.82 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:52.44 -09:43:10.5: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8817 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:23.17 -05:12:38.9: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4498 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:03.01 -08:19:31.5: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9896 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:15.47 -05:35:47.9: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4384 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:59.64 -13:29:36.8: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6519 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:07.08 -11:46:42.9: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5014 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:38:25.54 -05:32:23.3: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:05:11.19 -09:30:25.9: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:04:07.66 -09:24:52.8: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:03:30.70 -13:48:31.7: 13.96 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:46:15.26 -05:45:06.3: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:32:58.00 -12:23:33.4: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:40:12.55 -08:35:29.6: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:20:50.84 -06:29:36.9: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:53:05.58 -08:40:18.2: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:58:02.10 -14:10:49.9: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:05:11.19 -09:30:25.9: 13.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:11.19 -09:30:25.9: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1770 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:04:07.66 -09:24:52.8: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:32:58.00 -12:23:33.4: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:46:15.26 -05:45:06.3: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:53:05.58 -08:40:18.2: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:03:30.70 -13:48:31.7: 13.75 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:07.66 -09:24:52.8: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2425 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:15.26 -05:45:06.3: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2177 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:58.00 -12:23:33.4: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1269 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:05.58 -08:40:18.2: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1967 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:38:25.54 -05:32:23.3: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:40:12.55 -08:35:29.6: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:30.70 -13:48:31.7: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5377 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:58:02.10 -14:10:49.9: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:20:50.84 -06:29:36.9: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:25.54 -05:32:23.3: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2039 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:12.55 -08:35:29.6: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2871 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:02.10 -14:10:49.9: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1465 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:50.84 -06:29:36.9: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2583 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:30:02.21 -09:49:14.2: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:59:02.75 -14:04:09.5: 13.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:35:44.44 -13:55:24.6: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:59:38.46 -06:16:36.0: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:59:45.59 -07:16:28.5: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:44:30.36 -08:15:55.0: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:04:16.28 -06:21:04.4: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:00:27.35 -14:58:49.7: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:30:17.18 -09:46:59.3: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:28:46.81 -13:42:19.8: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:30:02.21 -09:49:14.2: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:02.21 -09:49:14.2: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0690 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:28:46.81 -13:42:19.8: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:30:17.18 -09:46:59.3: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:44:30.36 -08:15:55.0: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:46.81 -13:42:19.8: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6228 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:04:16.28 -06:21:04.4: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:00:27.35 -14:58:49.7: 12.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:17.18 -09:46:59.3: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6052 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:30.36 -08:15:55.0: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7771 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:59:38.46 -06:16:36.0: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:35:44.44 -13:55:24.6: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:59:02.75 -14:04:09.5: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:27.35 -14:58:49.7: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6518 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:16.28 -06:21:04.4: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6482 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:38.46 -06:16:36.0: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9583 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:44.44 -13:55:24.6: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7040 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:02.75 -14:04:09.5: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0693 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:59:45.59 -07:16:28.5: 12.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:45.59 -07:16:28.5: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8970 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:33:39.94 -08:50:43.8: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:00:07.85 -14:46:02.1: 11.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:47:01.39 -05:37:58.6: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:04:59.96 -09:17:35.0: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:38:52.31 -13:23:18.5: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:58:21.41 -13:36:04.6: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:17:58.89 -06:08:59.5: 11.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:02:32.90 -11:28:45.3: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:05:12.22 -10:18:32.3: 11.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:02:20.79 -09:40:09.0: 10.13 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:33:39.94 -08:50:43.8: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:39.94 -08:50:43.8: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5058 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:00:07.85 -14:46:02.1: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:07.85 -14:46:02.1: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3126 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:47:01.39 -05:37:58.6: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:38:52.31 -13:23:18.5: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:01.39 -05:37:58.6: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5396 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:58:21.41 -13:36:04.6: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:04:59.96 -09:17:35.0: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:52.31 -13:23:18.5: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1619 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:05:12.22 -10:18:32.3: 11.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:02:32.90 -11:28:45.3: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:17:58.89 -06:08:59.5: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:21.41 -13:36:04.6: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0469 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:02:20.79 -09:40:09.0: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:59.96 -09:17:35.0: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3528 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:12.22 -10:18:32.3: ref_mag=11.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1983 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:32.90 -11:28:45.3: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2832 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:58.89 -06:08:59.5: ref_mag=11.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3254 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.15 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:20.79 -09:40:09.0: ref_mag=10.15 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4019 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:23:33.17 -04:46:34.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:54:45.29 -08:54:17.9: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:27:53.62 -05:39:36.0: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:36:45.26 -10:36:11.3: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:40:45.08 -06:55:57.1: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:43:37.76 -13:26:38.0: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:37:32.63 -06:45:54.1: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:56:00.63 -14:40:17.4: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:34:47.46 -07:14:30.3: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:59:13.21 -06:36:33.7: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:23:33.17 -04:46:34.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:33.17 -04:46:34.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:27:53.62 -05:39:36.0: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:54:45.29 -08:54:17.9: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:56:00.63 -14:40:17.4: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:53.62 -05:39:36.0: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4506 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:45.29 -08:54:17.9: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2502 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:43:37.76 -13:26:38.0: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:40:45.08 -06:55:57.1: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:36:45.26 -10:36:11.3: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:00.63 -14:40:17.4: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1088 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:37:32.63 -06:45:54.1: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:34:47.46 -07:14:30.3: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:45.08 -06:55:57.1: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3074 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:45.26 -10:36:11.3: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2362 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:32.63 -06:45:54.1: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4052 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:47.46 -07:14:30.3: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6620 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:59:13.21 -06:36:33.7: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:28:21.30 -13:08:20.1: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:02:38.09 -14:58:24.4: 13.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:26:22.03 -10:28:27.8: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:05:29.82 -06:16:32.4: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:58:02.63 -15:09:00.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:05:01.12 -11:57:08.7: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:21:18.24 -05:02:13.4: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:02:57.85 -11:43:13.6: 13.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:28:21.30 -13:08:20.1: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:21.30 -13:08:20.1: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0511 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:05:01.12 -11:57:08.7: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:02:38.09 -14:58:24.4: 13.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:05:29.82 -06:16:32.4: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:58:02.63 -15:09:00.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:02.63 -15:09:00.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:26:22.03 -10:28:27.8: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:01.12 -11:57:08.7: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7038 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:38.09 -14:58:24.4: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0567 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:29.82 -06:16:32.4: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9656 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:21:18.24 -05:02:13.4: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:18.24 -05:02:13.4: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0592 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:02:57.85 -11:43:13.6: 13.49 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:57.85 -11:43:13.6: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2723 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:02:53.97 -12:38:50.4: 13.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:35:18.78 -13:34:37.6: 13.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:00:04.89 -14:46:02.2: 13.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:30:32.88 -05:24:48.8: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:25:48.78 -08:38:14.0: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:02:48.32 -14:34:22.7: 14.29 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:03:21.71 -14:27:21.1: 14.03 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:02:53.97 -12:38:50.4: 13.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:35:18.78 -13:34:37.6: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:53.97 -12:38:50.4: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2918 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:18.78 -13:34:37.6: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1533 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:00:04.89 -14:46:02.2: 13.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:30:32.88 -05:24:48.8: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:04.89 -14:46:02.2: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2306 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:32.88 -05:24:48.8: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2630 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:25:48.78 -08:38:14.0: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:48.78 -08:38:14.0: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3728 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:02:48.32 -14:34:22.7: 13.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:03:21.71 -14:27:21.1: 13.99 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:48.32 -14:34:22.7: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4712 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:21.71 -14:27:21.1: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6015 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:03:58.69 -14:23:40.6: 13.86 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:02:40.26 -14:05:50.4: 13.94 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:20:50.14 -06:54:18.3: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:35:28.17 -12:56:36.2: 13.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:37:28.59 -06:46:20.0: 13.63 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:30:32.78 -05:25:12.8: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:28:35.82 -05:33:13.5: 13.47 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:20:50.14 -06:54:18.3: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:03:58.69 -14:23:40.6: 14.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:02:40.26 -14:05:50.4: 14.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:35:28.17 -12:56:36.2: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:58.69 -14:23:40.6: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5593 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:50.14 -06:54:18.3: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3659 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:40.26 -14:05:50.4: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4541 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:28.17 -12:56:36.2: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3269 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:37:28.59 -06:46:20.0: 13.67 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:28.59 -06:46:20.0: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5848 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:30:32.78 -05:25:12.8: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:32.78 -05:25:12.8: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7397 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:28:35.82 -05:33:13.5: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:35.82 -05:33:13.5: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6809 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:04:47.04 -12:21:41.0: 13.89 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:00:14.38 -13:21:38.5: 14.31 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:02:06.27 -14:46:28.7: 14.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 21:03:02.34 -10:17:04.2: 13.75 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:04:47.04 -12:21:41.0: 13.83 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:02:06.27 -14:46:28.7: 14.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:47.04 -12:21:41.0: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8260 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:00:14.38 -13:21:38.5: 14.13 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:14.38 -13:21:38.5: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7921 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:06.27 -14:46:28.7: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5368 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 21:03:02.34 -10:17:04.2: 13.92 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:02.34 -10:17:04.2: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9112 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382.fits at 20:33:42.18 -05:38:49.3: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383.fits at 20:33:42.18 -05:38:49.3: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:33:42.18 -05:38:49.3: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8778 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106925.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107460.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107613.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69380.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106703_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106703_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106706_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106706_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106707_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106707_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106713_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106713_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106718_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106718_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106720_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106720_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106725_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106725_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106729_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106729_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106730_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106730_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106732_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106732_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106733_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106733_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106735_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106735_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106736_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106736_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106737_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106737_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106739_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106739_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106740_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106740_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106741_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106741_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106742_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106742_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106744_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106744_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106745_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106745_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106747_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106747_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106748_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106748_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106750_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106750_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106751_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106751_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106752_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106752_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106753_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106753_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106754_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106754_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106756_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106756_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106757_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106757_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106758_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106758_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106760_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106760_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106761_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106761_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106762_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106762_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106763_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106763_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106764_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106764_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106765_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106765_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106766_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106766_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106770_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106770_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106771_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106771_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106773_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106773_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106800_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106800_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:27.78 -05:08:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106809_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 106809_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106925_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
Preparing report for the candidate 106925_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107146_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107146_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107186_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107186_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107204_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107204_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107215_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107215_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107264_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107264_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107305_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107305_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107407_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107407_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107460_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
Preparing report for the candidate 107460_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107490_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107490_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:06.17 -12:35:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107570_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107570_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:09.59 -12:35:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107571_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107571_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107602_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107602_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107613_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
Preparing report for the candidate 107613_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107618_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107618_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107634_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107634_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107637_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107637_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107650_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107650_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107716_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107716_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107734_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107734_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107748_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107748_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107785_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107785_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:39.22 -07:01:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107814_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107814_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107846_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107846_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107927_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107927_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107935_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107935_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107967_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107967_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107969_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107969_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107989_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 107989_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108010_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 108010_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108025_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 108025_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108039_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 108039_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108100_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 108100_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108136_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 108136_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108137_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 108137_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108162_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 108162_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:04:16.84 -15:00:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108183_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 108183_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108213_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 108213_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108237_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 108237_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56093_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 56093_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:17.33 -05:30:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61304_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 61304_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.58 -06:36:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12262_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 12262_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:16.52 -13:15:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69380_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
Preparing report for the candidate 69380_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16084_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 16084_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:53.16 -12:49:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12029_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 12029_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:03.28 -13:18:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23548_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443
The candidate 23548_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-22-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0443 did not pass the final checks
