This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 28.4249* 05 17 40.57 +23 07 22.3 6.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.9249,6.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.4249 6.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4249 2461249.9249 9.34 05:33:43.94 +21:44:00.1
184.69614 -6.09170 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 0 1 1 9.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:33:43.94 +21:44:00.1: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:43.94 +21:44:00.1: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 28.4249* 05 33 43.94 +21 44 00.1 9.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.9249,9.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.4249 9.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 28.4249* 05 17 40.55 +23 07 22.7 7.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.9249,7.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.4249 7.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4249 2461249.9249 11.46 05:35:30.87 +22:43:26.2
184.07733 -5.21298 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe 0 0 0 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:35:30.87 +22:43:26.2: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:35:30.87 +22:43:26.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 28.4249* 05 35 30.87 +22 43 26.2 11.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.9249,11.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.4249 11.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4249 2461249.9249 11.96 05:17:53.93 +22:47:41.6
181.77171 -8.56826 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope 0 0 1 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:17:53.93 +22:47:41.6: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:53.93 +22:47:41.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 28.4249* 05 17 53.93 +22 47 41.6 12.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.9249,11.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.4249 11.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4249 2461249.9249 11.93 05:45:34.75 +24:43:48.2
183.58701 -2.19799 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania 1 -0 1 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:45:34.75 +24:43:48.2: 15.31 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:34.75 +24:43:48.2: 15.97 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.18
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 28.4249* 05 45 34.75 +24 43 48.2 11.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.9249,11.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.4249 11.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4249 2461249.9249 12.95 05:33:50.17 +20:47:24.9
185.51057 -6.57629 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana 1 -0 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:33:50.17 +20:47:24.9: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:50.17 +20:47:24.9: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 28.4249* 05 33 50.17 +20 47 24.9 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.9249,12.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.4249 12.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4249 2461249.9249 13.46 05:19:18.19 +21:56:20.3
182.67255 -8.78028 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.9" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.76 Freia 0 0 0 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:19:18.19 +21:56:20.3: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:18.19 +21:56:20.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 28.4249* 05 19 18.19 +21 56 20.3 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.9249,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.4249 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4249 2461249.9249 12.57 05:53:16.16 +20:53:50.5
187.78954 -2.64355 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 9618834
Type: SR|L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.912 R1 12.432 R1 2451437.43000 171.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:53:16.16 +20:53:50.5: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:53:16.16 +20:53:50.5: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 28.4249* 05 53 16.16 +20 53 50.5 12.6 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 9618834,2461249.9249,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 9618834 20260728.4249 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.4249 2461249.9249 11.52 05:51:01.86 +19:24:19.7
188.81038 -3.85308 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J055102+1924.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.920 V Y 0.570 V 2452965.90000 235.697115000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:51:01.86 +19:24:19.7: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:51:01.86 +19:24:19.7: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 28.4249* 05 51 01.86 +19 24 19.7 11.5 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J055102+1924.4,2461249.9249,11.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J055102+1924.4 20260728.4249 11.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
First image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Last image: 2461249.92528466 28.07.2026 10:12:14.595 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19059
Objects passed selection criteria: 18957
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13061.5
Average stars matched: 12549.2 (96.0782 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 244876 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 28 02:13:30 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-182-g8380f0ac
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-28)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 28 07:08:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
First image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Last image: 2461249.92528466 28.07.2026 10:12:14.595 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 114
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 137313
Objects passed selection criteria: 136974
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 97192.5
Average stars matched: 90274.5 (92.8822 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 541752 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 28 02:13:30 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-182-g8380f0ac
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-28)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 28 07:16:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461249.92457208
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits'
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:13.520 +22:01:46.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:13.520 +22:01:46.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0333 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:16.500 +22:01:20.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:16.500 +22:01:20.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0203 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:13.520 +22:01:46.76
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:16.500 +22:01:20.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01362 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zTLwrMxoPR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QIceFmWhmU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J8C8b7OHq5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jEaFPAfn3W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 21750 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1679 to 91.6836 deg, Dec +16.3329 to +27.3623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1679 to 91.6836 deg, Dec 16.3329 to 27.3623 deg
Loaded 12332 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9225 out of 10163 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10163 out of 21750 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.923400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.923400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 21750 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1679 to 91.6836 deg, Dec +16.3329 to +27.3623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1679 to 91.6836 deg, Dec 16.3329 to 27.3623 deg
Loaded 12332 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9225 out of 10163 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10163 out of 21750 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3785 to 91.9053 deg, Dec +16.4883 to +27.3012 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3785 to 91.9053 deg, Dec 16.4883 to 27.3012 deg
Loaded 12326 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8851 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zTLwrMxoPR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2103, bad_region=0, passed=21750
Got 21750 stars (including 19623 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21750 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4785 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5185)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=822 n_q2=1611 n_q3=662 n_q4=1619 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QIceFmWhmU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4781 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5189)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=1528 n_q2=718 n_q3=1565 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.J8C8b7OHq5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=282, bad_region=0, passed=4915
Got 4915 stars (including 4628 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4915 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4446 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4379 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4379 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4445 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4379 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4379 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4379 stars left (next iteration limit 4816)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4379 robust_rms=7.524 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.314 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4379 robust_rms=0.736 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.311 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4379 robust_rms=0.451 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.555 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4379 robust_rms_before=1.724 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.523 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.451 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.653 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.555
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Image size: 945.6'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:13.630 +22:01:45.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 4915 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky384070.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.724 -> 0.451 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits N_match=4379 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.492 n_q1=879 n_q2=1406 n_q3=666 n_q4=1428 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jEaFPAfn3W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=294, bad_region=0, passed=4977
Got 4977 stars (including 4681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4492 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4432 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4432 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4494 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4433 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4433 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4433 stars left (next iteration limit 4875)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4433 robust_rms=7.473 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.307 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4433 robust_rms=0.740 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.270 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4433 robust_rms=0.468 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.567 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4433 robust_rms_before=1.690 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.520 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.468 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.661 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.567
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Image size: 945.4'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:16.605 +22:01:18.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 4977 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky384168.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.690 -> 0.468 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits N_match=4433 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=875 n_q2=1441 n_q3=686 n_q4=1431 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.149
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.490 worst_q_ratio=1.223
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits sigma_overall=0.479 worst_q_ratio=1.248
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits sigma_overall=0.486 worst_q_ratio=1.235
reference average sigma_overall=0.428 worst_q_ratio=1.186
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_astrometric_residuals.png (4714 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4716 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434_astrometric_residuals.png (4379 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435_astrometric_residuals.png (4433 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:40:29.95 +17:26:19.3: 10.73 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:33:43.94 +21:44:00.1: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:43.94 +21:44:00.1: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:33:43.94 +21:44:00.1: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=9.3318 delta=3.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:40:29.95 +17:26:19.3: 10.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.77 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:29.95 +17:26:19.3: ref_mag=10.77 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7915 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31956.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 31934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31936_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 31936_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31956_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 31956_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 02586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.51 +17:54:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07111_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 07111_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.88 +20:10:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:33:43.94 +21:44:00.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:13.520 +22:01:46.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:13.520 +22:01:46.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0333 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:16.500 +22:01:20.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:16.500 +22:01:20.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0203 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:13.520 +22:01:46.76
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:16.500 +22:01:20.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01362 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3w9NDRiB7f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BCdsLvJsNY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SwC9giYawu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xfEXP2QBth
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 149155 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1101 to 91.6891 deg, Dec +16.3191 to +27.3626 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1101 to 91.6891 deg, Dec 16.3191 to 27.3626 deg
Loaded 12382 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7632 out of 10495 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10495 out of 149155 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.783950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.783950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 149155 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1101 to 91.6891 deg, Dec +16.3191 to +27.3626 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1101 to 91.6891 deg, Dec 16.3191 to 27.3626 deg
Loaded 12382 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7632 out of 10495 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10495 out of 149155 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3382 to 91.9466 deg, Dec +16.4852 to +27.3055 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3382 to 91.9466 deg, Dec 16.4852 to 27.3055 deg
Loaded 12416 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7186 out of 10476 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10476 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 97 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
1.8 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3w9NDRiB7f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=40, blended=17632, bad_region=2, passed=149115
Got 149115 stars (including 131218 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 149115 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4765 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4766 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5182)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=831 n_q2=1594 n_q3=688 n_q4=1600 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BCdsLvJsNY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4756 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4709 stars left (next iteration limit 5182)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4709 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=976 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.225
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SwC9giYawu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1563, bad_region=1, passed=38917
Got 38917 stars (including 37299 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38917 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4791 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4793 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4721 stars left (next iteration limit 5193)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits N_match=4721 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=952 n_q2=1434 n_q3=771 n_q4=1564 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xfEXP2QBth (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1503, bad_region=1, passed=40345
Got 40345 stars (including 38783 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40345 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4785 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4721 stars left (next iteration limit 5192)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits N_match=4721 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.450 n_q1=951 n_q2=1436 n_q3=779 n_q4=1555 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-11-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_051631_TTUQ1b1x1_486224_iUfGJzaa/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:38:16.69 +19:27:36.7: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:49:30.71 +19:19:21.6: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:58:59.24 +20:30:04.5: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:09:07.93 +21:52:55.0: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:10:35.28 +17:26:28.2: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:16.69 +19:27:36.7: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:30.71 +19:19:21.6: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:16.69 +19:27:36.7: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0213 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:07.93 +21:52:55.0: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:30.71 +19:19:21.6: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5327 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:58:59.24 +20:30:04.5: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:35.28 +17:26:28.2: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:07.93 +21:52:55.0: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3144 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:35.28 +17:26:28.2: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5670 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:59.24 +20:30:04.5: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2816 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:02:49.73 +17:04:27.4: 9.72 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:01:52.48 +16:54:18.2: 9.77 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:03:17.61 +17:03:32.1: 9.55 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:49.73 +17:04:27.4: 9.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:52.48 +16:54:18.2: 9.85 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.77 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:17.61 +17:03:32.1: 9.61 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:49.73 +17:04:27.4: ref_mag=9.77 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2158 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.81 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:52.48 +16:54:18.2: ref_mag=9.81 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3044 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.58 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:17.61 +17:03:32.1: ref_mag=9.58 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1258 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:03:09.14 +17:05:15.9: 10.29 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:01:56.11 +16:52:44.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:02:59.09 +17:09:35.9: 10.60 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:02:34.87 +17:04:55.6: 10.92 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:35:30.87 +22:43:26.2: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:09.14 +17:05:15.9: 10.37 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:56.11 +16:52:44.7: 10.88 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.33 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:56.11 +16:52:44.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:09.14 +17:05:15.9: ref_mag=10.33 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6026 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:59.09 +17:09:35.9: 10.65 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.62 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:59.09 +17:09:35.9: ref_mag=10.62 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9968 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:17:53.93 +22:47:41.6: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:35:30.87 +22:43:26.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:34.87 +17:04:55.6: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.95 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:34.87 +17:04:55.6: ref_mag=10.95 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2963 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:53.93 +22:47:41.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:45:34.75 +24:43:48.2: 15.31 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:02:58.44 +17:03:46.5: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:01:41.76 +16:58:04.9: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:02:20.84 +16:52:15.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:34.75 +24:43:48.2: 15.97 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:45:34.75 +24:43:48.2: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=11.9282 delta=3.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:58.44 +17:03:46.5: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:58.44 +17:03:46.5: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8292 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:03:29.70 +16:56:17.3: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:41.76 +16:58:04.9: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:20.84 +16:52:15.5: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:20.84 +16:52:15.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:41.76 +16:58:04.9: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0161 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:29.70 +16:56:17.3: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:29.70 +16:56:17.3: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0354 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:03:01.74 +17:17:42.4: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:31:40.12 +18:13:14.0: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:40.12 +18:13:14.0: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:01.74 +17:17:42.4: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:40.12 +18:13:14.0: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4804 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:01.74 +17:17:42.4: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2525 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:33:50.17 +20:47:24.9: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:19:18.19 +21:56:20.3: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:50.17 +20:47:24.9: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:18.19 +21:56:20.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:53:16.16 +20:53:50.5: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:03:20.94 +16:42:21.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:53:16.16 +20:53:50.5: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:53:16.16 +20:53:50.5: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5313 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:20.94 +16:42:21.2: 10.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:20.94 +16:42:21.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:51:01.86 +19:24:19.7: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:51:01.86 +19:24:19.7: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:51:01.86 +19:24:19.7: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5219 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out185795.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out185872.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out185928.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186476.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186556.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38158.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out59548.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185542_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185542_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185543_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185543_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.25 +18:20:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185544_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185544_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:34.17 +24:06:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185548_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185548_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185558_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185558_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185560_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185560_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185565_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185565_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185570_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185570_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:05.28 +17:19:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185571_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185571_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:35.02 +16:55:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:28.24 +18:43:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185576_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 185576_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:39.67 +16:56:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:14.68 +16:55:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185605_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185605_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:23.90 +17:28:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185633_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185633_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:26.02 +17:24:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185635_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185635_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:10.68 +17:12:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185645_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185645_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185648_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185648_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185649_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185649_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:42.77 +23:02:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185680_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185680_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:22.20 +17:11:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185689_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185689_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185702_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185702_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:16.58 +16:52:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185705_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185705_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:24.16 +17:26:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185747_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185747_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185756_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185756_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185778_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185778_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:03.64 +17:16:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185795_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 185795_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185812_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185812_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185818_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185818_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:44.90 +17:20:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:51.09 +17:23:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185857_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185857_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.11 +22:38:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185872_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 185872_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185893_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185893_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:44.05 +16:56:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185897_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185897_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:17.08 +17:02:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185916_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185916_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:02.99 +23:18:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185928_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 185928_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185940_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185940_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:29.63 +17:34:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185948_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185948_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:10.55 +23:20:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185965_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185965_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:14.34 +23:18:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185973_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185973_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185995_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 185995_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.86 +23:48:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186105_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186105_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.76 +22:27:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186130_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186130_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186144_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186144_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.99 +26:25:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186152_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186152_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:31.66 +24:58:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186189_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186189_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186190_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186190_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.99 +18:33:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186206_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186206_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.69 +19:34:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186212_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186212_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:01.83 +26:45:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186227_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186227_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:54.89 +23:41:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186251_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186251_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186260_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186260_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186289_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186289_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.98 +25:05:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186308_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186308_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.23 +18:59:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186358_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186358_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:54.21 +26:06:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186361_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186361_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.76 +22:40:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186364_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186364_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.14 +19:48:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186371_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186371_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:13.91 +21:51:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186372_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186372_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.26 +18:33:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:58.15 +16:55:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.98 +20:10:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186404_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186404_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:22.86 +26:26:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186407_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186407_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.51 +21:37:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186449_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186449_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.30 +23:00:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186476_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 186476_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186481_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186481_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.61 +20:02:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 186497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.90 +19:32:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186556_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 186556_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72931_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 72931_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:50.55 +21:45:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59548_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 59548_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94746_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 94746_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.85 +23:10:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139712_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 139712_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.26 +24:10:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90374_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 90374_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.27 +22:45:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164069_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 164069_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163987_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 163987_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:04.52 +16:45:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162756_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 162756_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:14.94 +17:14:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38285_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 38285_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.74 +19:21:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50336_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 50336_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:28.89 +20:02:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74929_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 74929_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:53.62 +21:35:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42236_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 42236_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:09.53 +19:28:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15870_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 15870_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.51 +17:54:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23197_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 23197_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:37.88 +18:24:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129436_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 129436_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:08.12 +24:51:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25904_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 25904_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:00.42 +18:21:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51802_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 51802_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.47 +20:22:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53727_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53727_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.21 +20:22:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38158_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 38158_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123285_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 123285_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:00.51 +25:17:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57015_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 57015_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:32.93 +20:37:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23075_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 23075_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:35.24 +18:20:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50958_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 50958_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:01.30 +20:16:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74760_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 74760_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.14 +21:51:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63906_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 63906_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.87 +21:13:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43398_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 43398_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:48.59 +19:44:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47289_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 47289_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_05-12-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
