######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cam-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1032537 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1032537 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits_preview.png'
Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits_preview.png'
Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 676.8026
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 607.2003
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3386.6664
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 859.5751
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3383.0635
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 859.2258
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 5.00392
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-28T01:05:28.8617738' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-28T06:05:28.8617738' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61249.2538062613 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-28T06:05:38.7648004' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61249.2539208797 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 89.7850294862172 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 85.0304650535418 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.1716666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 2.28083333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.04528009546749 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29541 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29541 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 40.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.21 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 38.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.400832 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits :)
Spent 0.886272 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-28T01:06:19.2122386' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-28T06:06:19.2122386' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61249.2543890276 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-28T06:06:29.1141319' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61249.2545036343 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 89.7850289250292 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 85.0304650853037 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.1786111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 2.3 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.04483979764222 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29541 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29541 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 40.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.21 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 38.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.400832 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits :)
Spent 0.955149 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461249.75392200
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits'
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:19.957 +85:01:57.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:57:23.207 +85:02:27.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:19.957 +85:01:57.15
Second-epoch image center 05:57:23.207 +85:02:27.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0429 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:57:22.317 +85:03:09.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:19.957 +85:01:57.15
Second-epoch image center 05:57:22.317 +85:03:09.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0468 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:57:23.207 +85:02:27.62
Second-epoch second image center 05:57:22.317 +85:03:09.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01153 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yk6oZFbYu7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qrzE7oRLQE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BqzQh3XEkj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h2bCgt79LG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 11653 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3714 to 179.5198 deg, Dec +75.7550 to +89.8981 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3714 to 179.5198 deg, Dec 75.7550 to 89.8981 deg
Loaded 33449 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7286 out of 7617 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7617 out of 11653 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 11653 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3714 to 179.5198 deg, Dec +75.7550 to +89.8981 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3714 to 179.5198 deg, Dec 75.7550 to 89.8981 deg
Loaded 33449 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7286 out of 7617 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7617 out of 11653 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits (aperture=6.1)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 11626 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3725 to 179.5198 deg, Dec +75.7550 to +89.8803 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3725 to 179.5198 deg, Dec 75.7550 to 89.8803 deg
Loaded 33449 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7295 out of 7610 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7610 out of 11626 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
15.1 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.yk6oZFbYu7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=785, bad_region=0, passed=11653
Got 11653 stars (including 10853 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11653 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3714 through 0 to 179.5198, gap 179.5198 to 181.3714
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11653 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3553 through 0 to 179.5094, gap 179.5094 to 181.3553
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11653 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11653 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4920 stars left (next iteration limit 5410)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits N_match=4920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=1192 n_q2=1023 n_q3=1285 n_q4=1420 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qrzE7oRLQE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=780, bad_region=1, passed=11626
Got 11626 stars (including 10830 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11626 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3725 through 0 to 179.5198, gap 179.5198 to 181.3725
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3543 through 0 to 179.5090, gap 179.5090 to 181.3543
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits N_match=4919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=1195 n_q2=1020 n_q3=1283 n_q4=1421 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BqzQh3XEkj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=372, bad_region=0, passed=5707
Got 5707 stars (including 5331 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5707 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0307 through 0 to 179.9690, gap 179.9690 to 180.0307
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0229 through 0 to 179.9663, gap 179.9663 to 180.0229
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5405)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=10.496 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.847 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=0.459 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.507 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=0.343 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.389 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4914 robust_rms_before=0.963 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.343 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.338 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.389
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.338 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=1455 n_q2=1190 n_q3=1286 n_q4=983 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.h2bCgt79LG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, bad_region=0, passed=5694
Got 5694 stars (including 5289 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5694 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0304 through 0 to 179.9685, gap 179.9685 to 180.0304
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0230 through 0 to 179.9662, gap 179.9662 to 180.0230
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=10.493 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.879 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.460 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.489 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.407 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4911 robust_rms_before=0.965 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.330 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.348 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.407
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.348 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=1450 n_q2=1208 n_q3=1261 n_q4=992 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits sigma_overall=0.269 worst_q_ratio=1.131
ref2=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits sigma_overall=0.279 worst_q_ratio=1.162
new1=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits sigma_overall=0.330 worst_q_ratio=1.054
new2=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits sigma_overall=0.334 worst_q_ratio=1.105
reference average sigma_overall=0.274 worst_q_ratio=1.1465
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540_astrometric_residuals.png (4920 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541_astrometric_residuals.png (4919 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216_astrometric_residuals.png (4914 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217_astrometric_residuals.png (4911 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 09:21:17.39 +81:23:20.1: 9.77 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 09:21:17.39 +81:23:20.1: 9.76 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.76 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:21:17.39 +81:23:20.1: ref_mag=9.76 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9967 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20599_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 20599_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 10.15 | 09:21:16.98 +81:23:21.1 | 8840 2984 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 9.90 | 09:21:17.80 +81:23:19.0 | 8840 2977 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11436_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 11436_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 10.63 | 02:43:16.11 +81:08:13.4 | 0786 2543 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 02:43:16.06 +81:08:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08924_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 08924_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 11.30 | 06:23:25.74 +80:04:16.8 | 5525 0241 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 06:23:25.87 +80:04:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:19.957 +85:01:57.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:57:23.207 +85:02:27.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:19.957 +85:01:57.15
Second-epoch image center 05:57:23.207 +85:02:27.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0429 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:57:22.317 +85:03:09.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:19.957 +85:01:57.15
Second-epoch image center 05:57:22.317 +85:03:09.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0468 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:57:23.207 +85:02:27.62
Second-epoch second image center 05:57:22.317 +85:03:09.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01153 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oWw74m4l2a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LhFpyyiXq6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2a7bAw5mpZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EIEwX7y9O3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 70994 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0143 to 359.9893 deg, Dec +75.7550 to +89.9630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0143 to 359.9893 deg, Dec 75.7550 to 89.9630 deg
Loaded 33577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6810 out of 7815 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7815 out of 70994 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.667500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.667500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 70994 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0143 to 359.9893 deg, Dec +75.7550 to +89.9630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0143 to 359.9893 deg, Dec 75.7550 to 89.9630 deg
Loaded 33577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6810 out of 7815 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7815 out of 70994 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 71140 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0149 to 359.9884 deg, Dec +75.7549 to +89.9625 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0149 to 359.9884 deg, Dec 75.7549 to 89.9625 deg
Loaded 33577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6838 out of 7807 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 71140 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 45 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
2.0 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
15.3 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.oWw74m4l2a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=4260, bad_region=0, passed=70984
Got 70984 stars (including 66619 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70984 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0088 through 0 to 179.9951, gap 179.9951 to 180.0088
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0713 through 0 to 179.9937, gap 179.9937 to 180.0713
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.242 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=1167 n_q2=1038 n_q3=1309 n_q4=1404 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LhFpyyiXq6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=4141, bad_region=1, passed=71128
Got 71128 stars (including 66865 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71128 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0146 through 0 to 179.9984, gap 179.9984 to 180.0146
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0729 through 0 to 179.9976, gap 179.9976 to 180.0729
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1159 n_q2=1047 n_q3=1298 n_q4=1417 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2a7bAw5mpZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1222, bad_region=2, passed=35679
Got 35679 stars (including 34404 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35679 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0018 through 0 to 179.9901, gap 179.9901 to 180.0018
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0121 through 0 to 179.9926, gap 179.9926 to 180.0121
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1409 n_q2=1188 n_q3=1314 n_q4=1007 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EIEwX7y9O3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1260, bad_region=2, passed=35878
Got 35878 stars (including 34571 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35878 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0296 through 0 to 179.9994, gap 179.9994 to 180.0296
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0232 through 0 to 179.9916, gap 179.9916 to 180.0232
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4916 stars left (next iteration limit 5406)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits N_match=4916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=1408 n_q2=1190 n_q3=1306 n_q4=1012 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 03:38:37.88 +83:01:55.1: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 04:29:02.87 +84:16:46.0: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 02:31:25.30 +85:41:17.5: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 08:16:50.68 +79:29:25.0: 11.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 03:38:37.88 +83:01:55.1: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 04:29:02.87 +84:16:46.0: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:37.88 +83:01:55.1: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4863 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:02.87 +84:16:46.0: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8914 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 02:31:25.30 +85:41:17.5: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:31:25.30 +85:41:17.5: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6489 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 08:16:50.68 +79:29:25.0: 11.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 03:13:28.39 +84:02:25.1: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.06 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:16:50.68 +79:29:25.0: ref_mag=11.06 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0452 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 03:11:11.36 +83:35:19.8: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 03:13:28.39 +84:02:25.1: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:28.39 +84:02:25.1: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5976 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 03:11:11.36 +83:35:19.8: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:11.36 +83:35:19.8: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9379 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 07:09:20.29 +85:35:58.0: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 03:49:37.57 +83:21:41.6: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 09:36:27.81 +81:21:18.9: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 03:43:39.94 +83:20:45.1: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 03:49:37.57 +83:21:41.6: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:37.57 +83:21:41.6: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0002 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 05:17:36.39 +84:13:31.9: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 09:36:27.81 +81:21:18.9: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:27.81 +81:21:18.9: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0028 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 07:09:20.29 +85:35:58.0: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 03:43:39.94 +83:20:45.1: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 09:44:22.67 +81:36:31.7: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:39.94 +83:20:45.1: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1895 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:20.29 +85:35:58.0: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9165 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 05:05:18.47 +83:28:01.2: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 09:13:52.59 +83:40:20.1: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 05:17:36.39 +84:13:31.9: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:36.39 +84:13:31.9: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1548 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 09:44:22.67 +81:36:31.7: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:44:22.67 +81:36:31.7: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9509 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 05:16:55.68 +84:11:28.1: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 05:05:18.47 +83:28:01.2: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:18.47 +83:28:01.2: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1718 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 09:13:52.59 +83:40:20.1: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:13:52.59 +83:40:20.1: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2801 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 01:51:52.40 +86:16:01.1: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 05:16:55.68 +84:11:28.1: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 06:05:23.05 +81:29:32.7: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:55.68 +84:11:28.1: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3233 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 01:51:52.40 +86:16:01.1: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:51:52.40 +86:16:01.1: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4150 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 06:05:23.05 +81:29:32.7: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:23.05 +81:29:32.7: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3737 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 04:39:25.77 +82:29:54.5: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-38-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0540.fits at 07:16:45.27 +85:11:25.1: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 04:39:25.77 +82:29:54.5: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_05-39-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0541.fits at 07:16:45.27 +85:11:25.1: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:25.77 +82:29:54.5: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3229 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:45.27 +85:11:25.1: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6522 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86589_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 86589_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 13.62 | 02:31:25.58 +85:41:17.8 | 2728 4521 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.69 | 02:31:25.02 +85:41:17.2 | 2728 4515 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86590_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 86590_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.29 | 02:29:03.61 +82:12:41.8 | 1075 3206 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 02:29:03.47 +82:12:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86591_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 86591_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 13.48 | 03:38:38.17 +83:01:55.3 | 2411 2677 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.49 | 03:38:37.59 +83:01:54.9 | 2411 2671 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86597_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 86597_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.98 | 03:21:02.95 +87:11:44.2 | 3691 4841 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 03:21:02.54 +87:11:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86599_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 86599_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.87 | 04:33:15.43 +85:56:20.6 | 3899 3873 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 04:33:14.95 +85:56:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86600_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 86600_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 12.85 | 04:29:02.66 +84:16:45.7 | 3500 2962 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.94 | 04:29:03.07 +84:16:46.4 | 3501 2955 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86604_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 86604_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 11.82 | 02:46:54.52 +84:36:26.6 | 2373 3933 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 02:46:54.73 +84:36:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87402_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 87402_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 11.05 | 08:16:50.72 +79:29:24.8 | 8462 1039 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 11.04 | 08:16:50.64 +79:29:25.2 | 8462 1032 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88637_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 88637_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.24 | 02:59:10.31 +86:14:19.9 | 3172 4527 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 02:59:10.27 +86:14:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88868_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 88868_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.56 | 01:31:18.26 +89:02:13.8 | 4202 5938 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 01:31:18.78 +89:02:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89057_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 89057_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.56 | 00:38:35.52 +84:41:45.8 | 1580 5543 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 00:38:35.77 +84:41:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89077_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 89077_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 12.60 | 03:13:28.44 +84:02:24.7 | 2430 3420 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.60 | 03:13:28.34 +84:02:25.6 | 2430 3413 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89530_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 89530_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.56 | 08:56:12.36 +86:42:43.0 | 6152 4794 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 08:56:11.27 +86:42:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89531_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 89531_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.85 | 02:46:16.81 +82:48:52.7 | 1577 3193 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 02:46:16.93 +82:48:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89670_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 89670_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.73 | 04:10:45.77 +80:41:30.8 | 2314 1103 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 04:10:45.03 +80:41:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89748_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 89748_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 12.94 | 03:11:11.18 +83:35:20.1 | 2225 3235 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.93 | 03:11:11.55 +83:35:19.4 | 2226 3228 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89779_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 89779_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.81 | 07:29:48.69 +82:24:04.2 | 6607 1999 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 07:29:48.94 +82:24:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89816_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 89816_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.83 | 08:09:41.52 +81:42:13.3 | 7540 2035 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 08:09:41.73 +81:42:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89853_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 89853_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 12.90 | 07:09:19.89 +85:35:57.9 | 5597 3676 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.94 | 07:09:20.68 +85:35:58.2 | 5597 3670 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90096_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 90096_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 13.02 | 03:49:37.60 +83:21:41.5 | 2684 2742 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.98 | 03:49:37.55 +83:21:41.7 | 2684 2735 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90158_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 90158_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.03 | 06:00:22.54 +85:09:09.4 | 4826 3256 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 06:00:22.41 +85:09:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90336_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 90336_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.20 | 05:19:00.65 +81:13:18.9 | 3954 0942 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 05:19:00.98 +81:13:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90383_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 90383_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 13.00 | 09:36:27.74 +81:21:15.9 | 9064 3250 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.00 | 09:36:27.88 +81:21:21.9 | 9063 3243 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90536_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 90536_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 13.19 | 03:43:39.57 +83:20:44.8 | 2590 2788 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.19 | 03:43:40.31 +83:20:45.4 | 2590 2781 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90544_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 90544_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 13.15 | 05:17:36.86 +84:13:31.8 | 4199 2744 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.16 | 05:17:35.93 +84:13:32.0 | 4199 2738 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90631_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 90631_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.23 | 04:03:05.36 +81:13:04.4 | 2292 1470 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 04:03:06.12 +81:13:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90669_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 90669_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.15 | 02:17:54.11 +89:17:35.7 | 4386 5927 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 02:17:51.88 +89:17:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90749_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 90749_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 13.13 | 09:44:22.72 +81:36:32.0 | 9033 3483 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.85 | 09:44:22.62 +81:36:31.4 | 9033 3476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90885_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 90885_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 13.24 | 05:05:17.56 +83:28:01.0 | 3921 2331 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.13 | 05:05:19.37 +83:28:01.3 | 3922 2324 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90962_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 90962_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 13.24 | 09:13:52.05 +83:40:19.7 | 7665 3740 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.32 | 09:13:53.14 +83:40:20.4 | 7666 3733 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90972_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 90972_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 13.31 | 05:16:55.69 +84:11:26.3 | 4185 2725 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.33 | 05:16:55.67 +84:11:29.9 | 4186 2719 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91059_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 91059_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 13.42 | 01:51:53.20 +86:16:01.4 | 2773 5064 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.41 | 01:51:51.60 +86:16:00.8 | 2774 5058 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91113_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 91113_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 13.33 | 06:05:23.28 +81:29:32.4 | 5009 1064 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.43 | 06:05:22.83 +81:29:33.0 | 5010 1057 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91129_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 91129_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.32 | 06:39:17.78 +87:18:46.8 | 5056 4588 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 06:39:18.43 +87:18:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91432_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 91432_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.35 | 04:08:39.74 +86:38:22.8 | 3842 4354 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 04:08:38.93 +86:38:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91448_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 91448_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.55 | 02:59:25.02 +85:11:50.8 | 2743 4068 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 02:59:25.44 +85:11:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91552_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 91552_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 13.50 | 04:39:25.92 +82:29:55.0 | 3310 1890 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.22 | 04:39:25.63 +82:29:54.0 | 3310 1883 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91602_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 91602_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.56 | 08:49:14.60 +85:48:35.1 | 6487 4361 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 08:49:14.55 +85:48:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91964_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 91964_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.25392 | 2461249.75392 | 13.62 | 07:16:45.41 +85:11:25.1 | 5765 3476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0216.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.70 | 07:16:45.12 +85:11:25.0 | 5766 3469 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92144_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 92144_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 13.85 | 08:16:24.66 +84:04:39.5 | 6820 3282 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 08:16:24.50 +84:04:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42252_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 42252_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 10.77 | 02:43:16.16 +81:08:13.7 | 0786 2543 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 02:43:16.15 +81:08:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20648_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 20648_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.74 | 00:27:21.14 +86:54:58.2 | 2886 5901 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 00:27:21.41 +86:54:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56696_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 56696_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.76 | 06:03:59.67 +82:14:07.7 | 4957 1504 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62096_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 62096_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 11.38 | 06:23:25.69 +80:04:17.2 | 5525 0241 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 06:23:25.85 +80:04:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62018_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217
The candidate 62018_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 07 28.25450 | 2461249.75450 | 12.91 | 02:13:36.38 +82:44:04.1 | 1141 3642 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_011725_TTUQ1b1x1_1979081_ei5hNdIU/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0217.fits |
**** FOUND 02:13:36.37 +82:44:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461249.75392200 -observatory V36
07:11:25.04 +19:17:35.3 Mercury (1.0mag)
11:22:49.58 +04:19:02.9 Venus (-4.2mag)
05:17:08.84 +23:06:44.4 Mars (1.3mag)
08:32:59.96 +19:17:10.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:49.23 +03:21:08.3 Saturn (0.7mag)
04:10:17.26 +20:53:11.3 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:37.93 +00:17:08.9 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:29:12.27 -23:25:45.9 Pluto (14.4mag)
19:27:28.27 -26:04:22.2 Moon (-12.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 28 03:13 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461249.75392200:
08:33:07.59 +19:16:39.7 Io (5.9mag)
08:33:04.60 +19:16:52.7 Europa (6.3mag)
08:32:46.19 +19:18:06.7 Ganymede (5.5mag)
08:33:21.55 +19:15:40.9 Callisto (6.7mag)
08:30:49.40 +19:10:07.0 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:33:02.81 +19:16:59.6 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:30:14.36 +19:10:49.1 Elara (17.7mag)
08:36:58.62 +19:01:59.2 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:36:53.38 +19:25:12.8 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:46.17 +03:20:38.3 Titan (8.5mag)
00:56:43.60 +03:21:12.0 Rhea (9.8mag)
00:56:28.53 +03:18:30.7 Iapetus (11.2mag)
00:57:04.95 +03:20:53.5 Hyperion (14.5mag)
00:56:26.04 +03:15:48.3 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 28 03:13 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461249.75392200:
18:24:32.30 -27:52:25.2 JWST
11:34:25.04 +51:01:48.1 Chandra
23:26:49.59 +61:33:07.7 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 28 03:13 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461249.75392200 -observatory V36
03:00:28.70 +16:22:46.7 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:06:11.16 -34:38:42.4 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:43:21.58 -68:32:16.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:06:41.46 +32:46:16.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:08:03.60 +31:16:05.7 16.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:47:20.80 +31:58:23.6 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:32:11.29 +26:42:59.2 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:11:29.18 +28:58:04.6 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:21:30.69 +05:14:37.1 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:11:12.65 -11:53:18.6 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:25:42.96 +66:59:43.9 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
16:00:48.29 -11:53:26.1 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:33:05.41 +66:45:35.8 18.0mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:55:20.84 +30:51:15.6 15.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:09:23.66 +15:36:19.4 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:17:32.02 +42:10:02.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:26:16.24 +48:18:25.4 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:05:57.15 -13:10:00.3 15.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:48:37.72 +26:03:25.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:25:31.14 -14:43:56.6 17.3mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:18:06.95 +21:33:27.8 17.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:52:04.52 +03:02:05.4 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:11:58.57 +78:42:18.2 17.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:01:52.46 +45:54:30.5 17.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:38:04.16 +07:16:03.3 17.2mag A/2026 E1
21:45:04.67 -22:28:22.3 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:22:37.40 -02:45:33.3 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:25:07.59 +31:24:19.0 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:45:13.17 +08:13:50.0 17.2mag 63P/Wild
00:53:43.01 -05:08:43.1 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
05:10:11.41 +20:44:33.0 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
02:48:22.02 +12:44:35.0 16.5mag 88P/Howell
07:26:51.67 +29:00:54.8 16.0mag 93P/Lovas
03:36:23.83 +12:39:55.4 17.9mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
05:20:01.40 +31:08:22.5 16.5mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
08:52:14.56 +28:23:32.8 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:22:08.59 -05:59:46.5 17.0mag 124P/Mrkos
05:19:59.45 +21:09:14.4 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:09:16.92 +19:21:05.1 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
08:13:49.70 +12:54:36.3 17.7mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:21:31.70 -19:44:34.2 16.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
06:37:32.88 +36:54:23.1 15.6mag 162P/SidingSpring
17:40:48.51 +29:48:46.0 13.1mag 169P/NEAT
02:21:25.77 +09:07:32.5 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:37:11.11 -09:19:51.5 17.4mag 235P/LINEAR
20:30:34.13 -52:26:28.9 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
02:50:13.50 +20:22:06.4 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
06:31:58.09 +37:44:36.7 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:07:42.30 +04:19:08.4 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski
08:50:51.33 +18:53:58.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
08:19:23.09 +37:41:40.3 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Jul 28 03:13 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 28 03:13 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 28 03:13 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
23:28:20.264 -02:45:01.54 AT 2026udj 2026-06-27.39 21.46
15:05:14.436 -36:20:56.85 AT 2026udi 2026-07-08.03 19.35
00:31:18.282 -43:46:06.08 AT 2026udh 2026-07-12.40 23.4739
00:40:36.730 -43:07:11.88 AT 2026udg 2026-07-12.40 22.7345
00:27:10.575 -44:08:47.04 AT 2026udf 2026-07-12.40 22.824
03:56:35.271 -49:17:39.98 AT 2026ude 2026-07-12.41 22.9789
00:31:32.044 -43:21:56.99 AT 2026udd 2026-07-12.40 23.6713
22:50:13.778 -07:23:19.66 AT 2026udc 2026-07-12.36 23.1965
00:40:48.112 -44:10:38.19 AT 2026udb 2026-07-12.40 23.683
00:36:44.855 -44:15:14.57 AT 2026uda 2026-07-12.40 23.7801
23:51:48.800 +02:16:08.44 AT 2026ucz 2026-07-12.35 23.3767
22:47:30.921 -12:02:41.49 AT 2026ucy 2026-07-12.36 21.821
00:41:15.829 -45:07:23.74 AT 2026ucx 2026-07-12.40 24.4645
00:34:52.967 -44:42:02.22 AT 2026ucw 2026-07-12.40 23.3852
21:50:13.749 -07:15:39.18 AT 2026ucv 2026-07-11.32 22.03
21:48:51.518 -07:08:27.45 AT 2026ucu 2026-07-11.32 21.9988
21:50:54.462 -07:28:38.03 AT 2026uct 2026-07-11.32 22.2759
21:50:13.387 -05:48:05.26 AT 2026ucs 2026-07-11.32 21.901
21:53:32.009 -06:54:20.89 AT 2026ucr 2026-07-11.32 22.3106
00:29:05.705 -43:05:49.67 AT 2026ucq 2026-07-10.43 23.3537
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 28 03:13 tns_transients_list.txt