This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.1812 2461249.6812 12.70 01:01:21.49 +54:10:30.7
124.39999 -8.66827 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" OW Cas
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.992 r Y 0.590 r 2458268.73220 74.610354500000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:01:21.49 +54:10:30.7: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:01:21.49 +54:10:30.7: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 28.1812* 01 01 21.49 +54 10 30.7 12.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
OW Cas,2461249.6812,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
OW Cas 20260728.1812 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.1812 2461249.6812 9.74 01:27:50.82 +51:57:09.0
128.62300 -10.51647 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J012750.84+515708.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.620 g Y 0.540 g 2458430.83700 52.570000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:27:50.82 +51:57:09.0: 10.86 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:27:50.82 +51:57:09.0: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.86 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 28.1812* 01 27 50.82 +51 57 09.0 9.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J012750.84+515708.5,2461249.6812,9.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J012750.84+515708.5 20260728.1812 9.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.1812 2461249.6812 10.80 01:10:13.03 +49:10:21.9
126.08769 -13.58390 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" NSVS J0110132+491018
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.708 R1 Y 0.291 R1 160.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:10:13.03 +49:10:21.9: 14.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:10:13.03 +49:10:21.9: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 28.1812* 01 10 13.03 +49 10 21.9 10.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0110132+491018,2461249.6812,10.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0110132+491018 20260728.1812 10.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.1812 2461249.6812 12.06 01:05:19.43 +52:49:44.0
125.06082 -9.98545 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J010519.32+524943.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.330 g Y 0.680 g 2459477.81500 671.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:05:19.43 +52:49:44.0: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:05:19.43 +52:49:44.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 28.1812* 01 05 19.43 +52 49 44.0 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J010519.32+524943.6,2461249.6812,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J010519.32+524943.6 20260728.1812 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.1812 2461249.6812 10.55 00:48:10.32 +53:34:01.5
122.44058 -9.30155 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V0414 Cas
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.400 pg 17.000 pg 2429243.00000 394.616450000000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:48:10.32 +53:34:01.5: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:48:10.32 +53:34:01.5: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 28.1812* 00 48 10.32 +53 34 01.5 10.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0414 Cas,2461249.6812,10.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0414 Cas 20260728.1812 10.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.56851063 21.01.2026 01:38:29.318 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
First image: 2461061.56851063 21.01.2026 01:38:29.318 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Last image: 2461249.68152841 28.07.2026 04:21:14.055 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 14
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32770
Objects passed selection criteria: 32542
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 21622.2
Average stars matched: 20996.2 (97.1048 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 256504 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 28 02:13:30 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-182-g8380f0ac
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-28)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 28 03:13:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.56851063 21.01.2026 01:38:29.318 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
First image: 2461061.56851063 21.01.2026 01:38:29.318 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Last image: 2461249.68152841 28.07.2026 04:21:14.055 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 128
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 164 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 218484
Objects passed selection criteria: 217787
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 145377
Average stars matched: 140000 (96.3013 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2159288 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 28 02:13:30 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-182-g8380f0ac
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-28)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 28 03:26:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461249.68086781
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Image size: 939.9'x635.2' 15.7(deg)x10.6(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.97"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:24:33.360 +54:01:31.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.89"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:25:08.213 +54:00:33.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:24:33.360 +54:01:31.31
Second-epoch image center 01:25:08.213 +54:00:33.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0868 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:25:05.331 +54:01:03.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:24:33.360 +54:01:31.31
Second-epoch image center 01:25:05.331 +54:01:03.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0786 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:25:08.213 +54:00:33.69
Second-epoch second image center 01:25:05.331 +54:01:03.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01096 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FcJatKVbUO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AOHcCRFF9N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GgraHci4Cl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u0xGUuWN2S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 35308 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.6195 to 36.5866 deg, Dec +47.7466 to +59.4012 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.6195 to 36.5866 deg, Dec 47.7466 to 59.4012 deg
Loaded 24590 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3363 out of 3768 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3768 out of 35308 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.974100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.974100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 35308 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.6195 to 36.5866 deg, Dec +47.7466 to +59.4012 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.6195 to 36.5866 deg, Dec 47.7466 to 59.4012 deg
Loaded 24590 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3363 out of 3768 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3768 out of 35308 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 35341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.5741 to 36.4956 deg, Dec +47.7453 to +59.3920 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.5741 to 36.4956 deg, Dec 47.7453 to 59.3920 deg
Loaded 24542 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1465 out of 1693 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1693 out of 35341 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
2.1 pix Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
15.4 mag. Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FcJatKVbUO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=4165, bad_region=1, passed=35308
Got 35308 stars (including 31105 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35308 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013054 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010443 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4588 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4212 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4184 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35265 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.75"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4648 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4381 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4366 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
Excluding outliers - 4366 stars left (next iteration limit 4602)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits N_match=4366 sigma_overall_arcsec=2.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=2.662 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.570 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.590 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.629 n_q1=924 n_q2=1392 n_q3=1058 n_q4=992 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.122
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits -region wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AOHcCRFF9N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=4173, bad_region=1, passed=35341
Got 35341 stars (including 31112 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35341 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3010 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4114 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3546 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35306 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.93"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3509 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.03"
Excluding outliers - 3509 stars left (next iteration limit 3201)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=3509 sigma_overall_arcsec=3.731 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.639 sigma_q2_arcsec=11.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=2.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=17.221 n_q1=1281 n_q2=918 n_q3=733 n_q4=577 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=4.616
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GgraHci4Cl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=424, bad_region=0, passed=8130
Got 8130 stars (including 7698 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8130 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4865 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=9.149 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.661 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.702 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.140 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.593 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.763 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4865 robust_rms_before=1.344 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.577 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.593 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.701 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.763
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.701 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits N_match=4865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.652 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.731 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.570 n_q1=1132 n_q2=750 n_q3=1588 n_q4=1395 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.291
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.u0xGUuWN2S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=452, bad_region=0, passed=8184
Got 8184 stars (including 7730 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8184 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4865 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=9.188 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.768 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.694 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.549 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.591 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.729 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4865 robust_rms_before=1.328 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.577 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.591 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.733 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.729
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.733 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits N_match=4865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.651 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.734 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.567 n_q1=1132 n_q2=765 n_q3=1576 n_q4=1392 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.298
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits sigma_overall=2.371 worst_q_ratio=1.122
ref2=Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits sigma_overall=3.731 worst_q_ratio=4.616
new1=fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits sigma_overall=0.566 worst_q_ratio=1.291
new2=fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits sigma_overall=0.565 worst_q_ratio=1.298
reference average sigma_overall=3.051 worst_q_ratio=2.869
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016_astrometric_residuals.png (4366 matched stars from wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.64 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (3509 matched stars from wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 1.89 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104_astrometric_residuals.png (4865 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105_astrometric_residuals.png (4865 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52448_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52448_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:55.17 +57:09:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52475_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52475_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:14:47.75 +51:48:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52487_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52487_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:04:54.93 +53:15:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28730_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 28730_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:43:39.30 +50:41:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25051_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 25051_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:45.38 +52:27:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11932_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 11932_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:28.38 +56:23:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08756_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 08756_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:51:53.00 +57:12:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05254_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 05254_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:36:01.51 +57:54:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24193_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 24193_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:54:03.26 +52:07:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01218_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 01218_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:01:28.08 +58:18:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03104_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 03104_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:54:53.86 +58:33:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Image size: 939.9'x635.2' 15.7(deg)x10.6(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.97"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:24:33.360 +54:01:31.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.89"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:25:08.213 +54:00:33.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:24:33.360 +54:01:31.31
Second-epoch image center 01:25:08.213 +54:00:33.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0868 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:25:05.331 +54:01:03.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:24:33.360 +54:01:31.31
Second-epoch image center 01:25:05.331 +54:01:03.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0786 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:25:08.213 +54:00:33.69
Second-epoch second image center 01:25:05.331 +54:01:03.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01096 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J8XUGtbmYv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4PFORqWaI1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4I1zVUmnFw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pPszZ5ohFS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 240111 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.5529 to 36.6409 deg, Dec +47.7027 to +59.4052 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.5529 to 36.6409 deg, Dec 47.7027 to 59.4052 deg
Loaded 24754 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2494 out of 3869 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3869 out of 240111 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.848400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.848400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 240111 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.5529 to 36.6409 deg, Dec +47.7027 to +59.4052 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.5529 to 36.6409 deg, Dec 47.7027 to 59.4052 deg
Loaded 24754 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2494 out of 3869 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3869 out of 240111 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 240174 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.5320 to 36.5799 deg, Dec +47.7116 to +59.3935 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.5320 to 36.5799 deg, Dec 47.7116 to 59.3935 deg
Loaded 24693 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1050 out of 1812 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1812 out of 240174 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 114 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
1.9 pix Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
15.5 mag. Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 12.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.J8XUGtbmYv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=58, blended=39769, bad_region=24, passed=240053
Got 240053 stars (including 199921 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 240053 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013054 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010443 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4567 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4190 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4259 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4162 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 240049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4655 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4356 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 240049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4342 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 240049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Excluding outliers - 4342 stars left (next iteration limit 4578)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits N_match=4342 sigma_overall_arcsec=2.612 sigma_q1_arcsec=2.847 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.711 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.754 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.727 n_q1=850 n_q2=1365 n_q3=1116 n_q4=1011 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits -region wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4PFORqWaI1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=16, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=61, blended=39462, bad_region=24, passed=240097
Got 240097 stars (including 200216 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 240097 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 240059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4052 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3463 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 240059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3426 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 240085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.89"
Excluding outliers - 3426 stars left (next iteration limit 3105)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=3426 sigma_overall_arcsec=4.097 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.959 sigma_q2_arcsec=9.920 sigma_q3_arcsec=2.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=16.500 n_q1=1182 n_q2=927 n_q3=753 n_q4=564 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=4.027
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4I1zVUmnFw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=2531, bad_region=0, passed=51989
Got 51989 stars (including 49389 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51989 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.724 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.584 n_q1=1131 n_q2=732 n_q3=1606 n_q4=1408 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.286
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pPszZ5ohFS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2544, bad_region=1, passed=52520
Got 52520 stars (including 49917 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52520 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.679 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.712 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.572 n_q1=1131 n_q2=746 n_q3=1583 n_q4=1417 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-20-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_232523_TTUQ1b1x1_1647216_rji3EjqY/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 02:01:48.12 +52:43:19.5: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:43:02.29 +54:33:22.7: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:45:06.89 +53:26:24.3: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:40:06.82 +54:27:47.9: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 02:08:24.72 +48:07:12.2: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:29:30.25 +48:52:09.9: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:33:15.22 +55:50:29.1: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:29:30.25 +48:52:09.9: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:29:30.25 +48:52:09.9: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=11.8004 delta=2.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:43:02.29 +54:33:22.7: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:43:02.29 +54:33:22.7: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9823 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 02:01:48.12 +52:43:19.5: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:01:48.12 +52:43:19.5: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4106 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:39:55.27 +57:53:02.2: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 02:08:24.72 +48:07:12.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:40:06.82 +54:27:47.9: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:45:06.89 +53:26:24.3: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:45:06.89 +53:26:24.3: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4238 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:40:06.82 +54:27:47.9: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6311 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:33:15.22 +55:50:29.1: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:33:15.22 +55:50:29.1: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4891 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:39:55.27 +57:53:02.2: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:39:55.27 +57:53:02.2: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2825 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 02:10:29.79 +48:45:47.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 02:10:29.79 +48:45:47.9: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:10:29.79 +48:45:47.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:00:57.43 +56:38:10.9: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:44:52.78 +55:14:04.3: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:25:31.65 +57:37:38.4: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:00:57.43 +56:38:10.9: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:00:57.43 +56:38:10.9: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2197 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:52:37.95 +52:16:37.6: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:44:52.78 +55:14:04.3: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:44:52.78 +55:14:04.3: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4361 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:11:05.07 +56:47:02.9: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:25:31.65 +57:37:38.4: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:25:31.65 +57:37:38.4: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2970 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:52:37.95 +52:16:37.6: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:52:37.95 +52:16:37.6: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5154 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:11:05.07 +56:47:02.9: 9.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:11:05.07 +56:47:02.9: ref_mag=9.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.4922 delta=-3.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:48:07.10 +53:46:56.0: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:53:29.98 +55:37:00.4: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:48:07.10 +53:46:56.0: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:48:07.10 +53:46:56.0: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6467 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:35:18.19 +56:03:19.5: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:43:49.05 +55:54:24.8: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:53:29.98 +55:37:00.4: 15.65 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:05:06.42 +55:55:15.6: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:29.98 +55:37:00.4: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7888 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:35:18.19 +56:03:19.5: 15.62 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:35:18.19 +56:03:19.5: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8295 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:43:49.05 +55:54:24.8: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:43:49.05 +55:54:24.8: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6815 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:05:06.42 +55:55:15.6: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:05:06.42 +55:55:15.6: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0061 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:01:21.49 +54:10:30.7: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:01:21.49 +54:10:30.7: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:01:21.49 +54:10:30.7: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6951 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:27:50.82 +51:57:09.0: 10.86 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:10:13.03 +49:10:21.9: 14.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:10:13.03 +49:10:21.9: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:10:13.03 +49:10:21.9: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=10.7956 delta=3.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:27:50.82 +51:57:09.0: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.86 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:27:50.82 +51:57:09.0: ref_mag=10.86 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7420 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:05:19.43 +52:49:44.0: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:48:10.32 +53:34:01.5: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:05:19.43 +52:49:44.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:05:19.43 +52:49:44.0: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0609 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-39-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:48:10.32 +53:34:01.5: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:48:10.32 +53:34:01.5: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5526 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out271123.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out271126.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out135511.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151150.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out166940.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out183217.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out204846.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271094_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271094_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271098_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271098_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:43:03.55 +51:55:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271099_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271099_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271100_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271100_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:53:19.98 +56:56:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271108_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271108_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271120_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271120_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271123_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271123_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:29:30.25 +48:52:09.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.83)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271124_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271124_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:53:11.52 +52:36:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271125_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271125_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271126_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271126_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:08:24.72 +48:07:12.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.50, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.48)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.250 356534894623196288 032.10206376879 +48.12004433697 10.8971 10.3260 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.250#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271127_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271127_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271128_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271128_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:36:45.09 +54:55:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271180_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271180_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:49.64 +57:07:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271183_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271183_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:16.54 +57:10:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271203_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271203_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:00.79 +57:07:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271205_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271205_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271214_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271214_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:38:18.44 +57:32:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271220_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271220_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:53.00 +57:06:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271240_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271240_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:56.97 +57:10:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271253_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271253_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:36:46.10 +56:08:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271265_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271265_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:37:13.67 +53:54:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271277_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271277_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:23:03.59 +57:10:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271282_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271282_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:02:22.85 +54:30:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271283_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271283_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:08:42.82 +58:16:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271285_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271285_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:59.46 +57:47:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271293_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271293_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271300_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271300_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:48:38.86 +50:59:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271304_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271304_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:40:44.36 +56:30:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271307_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271307_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:04.26 +57:32:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271310_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271310_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:44:07.91 +49:04:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271320_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271320_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:36:38.85 +53:53:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271324_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271324_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:00.45 +57:56:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271337_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271337_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:45:07.32 +55:14:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271341_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271341_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271350_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271350_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:36:03.70 +54:11:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271351_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271351_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:43:37.67 +56:31:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271361_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271361_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:47.23 +57:00:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271367_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271367_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:40:24.68 +56:34:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271378_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271378_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271386_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271386_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:05.86 +58:00:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271389_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271389_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271392_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271392_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271402_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271402_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:04:32.63 +57:59:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271404_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271404_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:08:42.35 +58:17:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271414_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271414_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:51:31.72 +56:31:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271419_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271419_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:52:09.26 +55:08:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271427_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271427_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:45:43.34 +56:47:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271437_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271437_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:32:51.92 +55:15:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271439_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271439_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:33:42.30 +58:17:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271444_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271444_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:49:03.64 +57:59:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271445_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271445_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:18:19.21 +57:42:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271450_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271450_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271456_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271456_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:21:50.79 +57:15:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271459_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271459_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271461_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271461_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:59:53.92 +54:50:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271465_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271465_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:54:42.01 +56:19:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271469_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271469_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:49:02.43 +57:04:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271477_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271477_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:36.00 +57:52:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271480_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271480_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271482_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271482_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271488_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271488_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271491_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271491_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:04:10.27 +57:08:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271514_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 271514_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:44:22.61 +57:30:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170748_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 170748_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:54:03.26 +52:07:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71594_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 71594_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:40:57.36 +56:19:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69219_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 69219_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:50.84 +55:21:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135511_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
Preparing report for the candidate 135511_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55656_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 55656_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:51:53.00 +57:12:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66869_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 66869_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:33:41.56 +56:39:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143751_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 143751_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:07:15.73 +53:49:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119212_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 119212_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:26.13 +54:50:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38817_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 38817_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:22:51.48 +57:50:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86194_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 86194_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:47:18.90 +55:37:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50706_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 50706_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:49.78 +57:23:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98844_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 98844_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:59:14.62 +55:35:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234126_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 234126_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:57:50.73 +50:50:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32187_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 32187_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:36:01.50 +57:54:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134905_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 134905_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:04:54.92 +53:15:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49015_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 49015_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:31:28.03 +57:20:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183217_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
Preparing report for the candidate 183217_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190638_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 190638_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:23:20.41 +51:06:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40160_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 40160_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204846_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
Preparing report for the candidate 204846_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33691_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 33691_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:03:07.39 +57:18:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118254_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 118254_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:55:12.25 +54:11:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107088_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 107088_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:34:16.62 +55:04:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182548_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 182548_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:19:44.06 +52:02:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57835_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 57835_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:10:29.07 +57:08:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09481_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 09481_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:01:28.08 +58:18:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67170_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 67170_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:44.64 +56:30:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43838_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 43838_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:23:03.94 +57:36:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129000_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 129000_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:04:25.29 +54:27:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224990_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 224990_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:30:05.77 +50:10:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07880_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 07880_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:09:38.01 +59:05:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39758_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 39758_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:52:19.59 +57:19:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166940_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
Preparing report for the candidate 166940_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178613_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 178613_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:20:34.19 +52:11:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151150_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
Preparing report for the candidate 151150_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119842_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 119842_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:00:44.25 +54:01:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22712_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 22712_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:54:53.90 +58:33:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175286_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 175286_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:45.40 +52:27:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174370_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 174370_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:20:52.18 +52:24:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78143_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 78143_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:28.37 +56:23:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104636_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 104636_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:13.70 +55:19:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36632_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 36632_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:06.45 +56:36:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139262_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 139262_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:40:12.73 +53:52:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21741_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 21741_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:44.27 +58:15:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168628_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 168628_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:56:19.78 +52:03:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99713_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 99713_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:51:58.96 +55:08:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175992_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 175992_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:50:57.01 +51:55:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238839_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 238839_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:43:39.30 +50:41:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194836_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 194836_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:52:09.18 +50:47:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218839_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 218839_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:58:33.47 +49:12:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108529_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 108529_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_23-21-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
