This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.4497 2461248.9497 13.91 23:10:17.68 -06:43:11.7
68.67657 -58.48966 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.208 Lacrimosa 0 1 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:10:17.68 -06:43:11.7: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:10:17.68 -06:43:11.7: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.9497,13.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.4497 13.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.4497 2461248.9497 14.28 22:56:06.55 -03:31:27.6
68.48402 -53.72799 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.105158 2000 OL -1 0 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:56:06.55 -03:31:27.6: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:56:06.55 -03:31:27.6: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.9497,14.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.4497 14.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.4497 2461248.9497 14.82 23:27:33.91 +02:02:16.3
84.89727 -54.51940 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2892 Filipenko -1 -0 1 15.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:27:33.91 +02:02:16.3: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:27:33.91 +02:02:16.3: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.9497,14.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.4497 14.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.57935774 23.12.2025 01:54:06.509 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
First image: 2461032.57935774 23.12.2025 01:54:06.509 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
Last image: 2461248.95000744 27.07.2026 10:47:50.643 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9033
Objects passed selection criteria: 9015
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7153.25
Average stars matched: 6989.75 (97.7143 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234972 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 27 07:30:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.57935774 23.12.2025 01:54:06.509 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
First image: 2461032.57935774 23.12.2025 01:54:06.509 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
Last image: 2461248.95000744 27.07.2026 10:47:50.643 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 73
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.14
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 40418
Objects passed selection criteria: 40341
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 37117.8
Average stars matched: 35792.2 (96.4289 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 262180 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 27 07:33:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461248.94933166
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits'
wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:28.866 -01:58:37.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:38.113 -02:03:34.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:28.866 -01:58:37.35
Second-epoch image center 23:08:38.113 -02:03:34.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0910 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:35.793 -02:03:03.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:28.866 -01:58:37.35
Second-epoch image center 23:08:35.793 -02:03:03.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0793 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:38.113 -02:03:34.16
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:35.793 -02:03:03.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01293 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LYO1D5kxlL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Sj7daVD4Gm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RU5iV42df1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GlulXi6Ywy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2234 to 355.0573 deg, Dec -7.2779 to +3.3406 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2234 to 355.0573 deg, Dec -7.2779 to 3.3406 deg
Loaded 4460 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3796 out of 3941 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3941 out of 9295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.876950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.876950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2234 to 355.0573 deg, Dec -7.2779 to +3.3406 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2234 to 355.0573 deg, Dec -7.2779 to 3.3406 deg
Loaded 4460 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3796 out of 3941 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3941 out of 9295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits (aperture=6.7)
Read 9316 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2210 to 355.0436 deg, Dec -7.2865 to +3.3302 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2210 to 355.0436 deg, Dec -7.2865 to 3.3302 deg
Loaded 4453 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3796 out of 3939 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3939 out of 9316 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
2.3 pix Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
15.5 mag. Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LYO1D5kxlL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=474, bad_region=0, passed=9291
Got 9291 stars (including 8804 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9291 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.209 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.229 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.200 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.202 n_q1=230 n_q2=229 n_q3=236 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Sj7daVD4Gm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=467, bad_region=0, passed=9316
Got 9316 stars (including 8839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9316 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.208 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.203 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.212 n_q1=233 n_q2=230 n_q3=235 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RU5iV42df1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=338, bad_region=0, passed=5167
Got 5167 stars (including 4823 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=954 robust_rms=10.444 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=954 robust_rms=0.470 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=954 robust_rms_before=0.977 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.350 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.470 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.350 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=224 n_q2=234 n_q3=229 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GlulXi6Ywy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5043
Got 5043 stars (including 4714 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5043 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=952 robust_rms=10.653 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=952 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=952 robust_rms_before=1.023 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.340 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.489 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.340 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=221 n_q2=235 n_q3=227 n_q4=269 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.209 worst_q_ratio=1.095
ref2=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.223 worst_q_ratio=1.133
new1=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits sigma_overall=0.352 worst_q_ratio=1.138
new2=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.184
reference average sigma_overall=0.216 worst_q_ratio=1.114
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.20 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.20 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357_astrometric_residuals.png (952 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:28.866 -01:58:37.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:38.113 -02:03:34.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:28.866 -01:58:37.35
Second-epoch image center 23:08:38.113 -02:03:34.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0910 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:35.793 -02:03:03.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:28.866 -01:58:37.35
Second-epoch image center 23:08:35.793 -02:03:03.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0793 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:38.113 -02:03:34.16
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:35.793 -02:03:03.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01293 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IyZZBnCxhe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1IkZqodTV4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M9cSbQxC7B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lDDBrJuV6D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 42163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2234 to 355.0727 deg, Dec -7.2780 to +3.3409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2234 to 355.0727 deg, Dec -7.2780 to 3.3409 deg
Loaded 4461 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3550 out of 3947 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3947 out of 42163 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.759750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.759750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.14
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 42163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2234 to 355.0727 deg, Dec -7.2780 to +3.3409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2234 to 355.0727 deg, Dec -7.2780 to 3.3409 deg
Loaded 4461 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3550 out of 3947 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3947 out of 42163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits (aperture=5.4)
Read 42326 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2089 to 355.0611 deg, Dec -7.2872 to +3.3312 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2089 to 355.0611 deg, Dec -7.2872 to 3.3312 deg
Loaded 4468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3550 out of 3945 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3945 out of 42326 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits (aperture=5.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 72 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
2.3 pix Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
2.0 pix fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
1.9 pix fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
15.6 mag. Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.IyZZBnCxhe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2238, bad_region=1, passed=42146
Got 42146 stars (including 39822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42146 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.210 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.199 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.231 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.188 n_q1=232 n_q2=229 n_q3=236 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1IkZqodTV4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2150, bad_region=1, passed=42307
Got 42307 stars (including 40115 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42307 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41621 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.217 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.210 n_q1=228 n_q2=232 n_q3=237 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.M9cSbQxC7B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1410, bad_region=17, passed=32797
Got 32797 stars (including 31320 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32797 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=230 n_q2=231 n_q3=230 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lDDBrJuV6D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1303, bad_region=15, passed=32297
Got 32297 stars (including 30911 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32297 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=234 n_q2=237 n_q3=228 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.206
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-46-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_054934_TTUQ1b1x1_3688611_oATg8Et1/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:51:17.23 +00:49:44.1: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:07:24.72 +00:57:00.1: 13.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:21:28.84 -00:46:41.9: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:53:27.13 -03:23:58.8: 13.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:10:53.48 +01:51:59.5: 14.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:23:02.38 -03:22:01.4: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:58:15.91 -00:06:06.9: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:05:02.42 +01:10:16.4: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:09:53.67 -01:59:33.1: 14.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:10:20.10 +02:41:05.4: 14.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:51:17.23 +00:49:44.1: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:51:17.23 +00:49:44.1: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0333 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:05:02.42 +01:10:16.4: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:05:02.42 +01:10:16.4: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2862 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:10:20.10 +02:41:05.4: 14.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:21:28.84 -00:46:41.9: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:58:15.91 -00:06:06.9: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:53:27.13 -03:23:58.8: 13.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:09:53.67 -01:59:33.1: 14.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:28.84 -00:46:41.9: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.3886 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:10:20.10 +02:41:05.4: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3431 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:53:27.13 -03:23:58.8: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=14.0938 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:09:53.67 -01:59:33.1: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.6301 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:58:15.91 -00:06:06.9: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=14.0960 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:10:53.48 +01:51:59.5: 14.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:07:24.72 +00:57:00.1: 13.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:23:02.38 -03:22:01.4: 13.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:10:53.48 +01:51:59.5: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.6209 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:07:24.72 +00:57:00.1: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.5567 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:02.38 -03:22:01.4: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2237 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:45:02.13 -05:00:16.9: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:17:48.03 -03:15:44.8: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:51:33.10 -02:07:02.0: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:11:53.42 +01:47:31.5: 13.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:03:01.27 +02:44:17.1: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:24:50.88 +00:27:21.7: 13.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:39:59.81 +01:26:25.8: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:53:17.50 -03:11:26.4: 13.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:21:52.03 -02:12:40.8: 13.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:59:40.24 -03:07:37.3: 13.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:45:02.13 -05:00:16.9: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:45:02.13 -05:00:16.9: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8705 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:11:53.42 +01:47:31.5: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:51:33.10 -02:07:02.0: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:17:48.03 -03:15:44.8: 13.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:11:53.42 +01:47:31.5: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8405 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:51:33.10 -02:07:02.0: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9515 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:17:48.03 -03:15:44.8: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=14.0692 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:53:17.50 -03:11:26.4: 13.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:39:59.81 +01:26:25.8: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:03:01.27 +02:44:17.1: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:24:50.88 +00:27:21.7: 13.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:59:40.24 -03:07:37.3: 13.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:21:52.03 -02:12:40.8: 13.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:53:17.50 -03:11:26.4: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9157 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:39:59.81 +01:26:25.8: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5773 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:50.88 +00:27:21.7: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9390 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:03:01.27 +02:44:17.1: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.8460 delta=-0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:59:40.24 -03:07:37.3: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8557 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:52.03 -02:12:40.8: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7422 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:37:13.49 -01:47:33.4: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:03:57.19 -01:21:44.5: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:01:35.16 -02:38:01.5: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:34:37.48 -01:41:09.5: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:15:32.64 +00:42:48.4: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:43:17.01 -06:23:59.0: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:42:10.90 -03:28:58.0: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:27:39.41 +01:52:38.4: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:02:45.97 +00:15:40.4: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:55:01.24 -00:46:35.0: 13.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:37:13.49 -01:47:33.4: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:01:35.16 -02:38:01.5: 13.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:03:57.19 -01:21:44.5: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:13.49 -01:47:33.4: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5283 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:35.16 -02:38:01.5: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3614 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:03:57.19 -01:21:44.5: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7108 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:27:39.41 +01:52:38.4: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:15:32.64 +00:42:48.4: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:43:17.01 -06:23:59.0: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:34:37.48 -01:41:09.5: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:42:10.90 -03:28:58.0: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:02:45.97 +00:15:40.4: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:39.41 +01:52:38.4: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9855 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:55:01.24 -00:46:35.0: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:32.64 +00:42:48.4: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.2553 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:17.01 -06:23:59.0: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8166 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:37.48 -01:41:09.5: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.1630 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:42:10.90 -03:28:58.0: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8371 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:02:45.97 +00:15:40.4: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6090 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:55:01.24 -00:46:35.0: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1317 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:47:15.70 -02:41:15.0: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:47:08.82 -02:41:09.0: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:11:39.01 -03:07:25.0: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:01:51.11 -03:28:16.2: 13.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:01:15.83 -06:04:24.7: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:08:19.53 +01:58:58.3: 13.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:24:17.17 -06:14:03.3: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:39:00.41 +01:00:50.1: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:09:33.74 +01:56:32.3: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:47:15.70 -02:41:15.0: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:47:08.82 -02:41:09.0: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:47:15.70 -02:41:15.0: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2053 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:22:54.83 +01:58:17.3: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:47:08.82 -02:41:09.0: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2115 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:11:39.01 -03:07:25.0: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:11:39.01 -03:07:25.0: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3228 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:24:17.17 -06:14:03.3: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:01:51.11 -03:28:16.2: 13.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:01:15.83 -06:04:24.7: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:08:19.53 +01:58:58.3: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:39:00.41 +01:00:50.1: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:17.17 -06:14:03.3: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5365 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:51.11 -03:28:16.2: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5112 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:15.83 -06:04:24.7: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5330 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:09:33.74 +01:56:32.3: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:08:19.53 +01:58:58.3: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3195 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:39:00.41 +01:00:50.1: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7064 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:09:33.74 +01:56:32.3: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7918 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:22:54.83 +01:58:17.3: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:22:54.83 +01:58:17.3: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9604 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:12:07.48 -00:09:46.4: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:10:17.68 -06:43:11.7: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:00:28.72 -01:25:20.7: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:32:28.04 +00:59:09.0: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:08:58.28 -02:50:16.6: 13.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:17:10.80 -04:27:11.8: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:44:49.23 +02:07:03.5: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:14:45.04 -06:43:39.8: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:28:36.84 -06:20:07.4: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:12:07.48 -00:09:46.4: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:10:17.68 -06:43:11.7: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:11:47.69 -04:48:20.7: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:12:07.48 -00:09:46.4: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8630 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:00:28.72 -01:25:20.7: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:00:28.72 -01:25:20.7: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9348 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:08:58.28 -02:50:16.6: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:17:10.80 -04:27:11.8: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:32:28.04 +00:59:09.0: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:14:45.04 -06:43:39.8: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:44:49.23 +02:07:03.5: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:08:58.28 -02:50:16.6: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9731 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:17:10.80 -04:27:11.8: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0970 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:28.04 +00:59:09.0: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0292 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:44:49.23 +02:07:03.5: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9985 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:14:45.04 -06:43:39.8: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9380 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:11:47.69 -04:48:20.7: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:11:47.69 -04:48:20.7: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9972 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:28:36.84 -06:20:07.4: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:36.84 -06:20:07.4: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1727 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:47:09.07 -02:41:50.2: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:17:59.80 -02:36:24.8: 14.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:04:07.99 -02:38:37.8: 13.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:39:25.09 -05:15:11.6: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:15:25.15 -04:00:37.8: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:11:13.02 -04:19:25.4: 14.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:04:01.73 -03:13:40.7: 13.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:51:16.36 -06:17:34.4: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:47:09.07 -02:41:50.2: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:47:09.07 -02:41:50.2: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0475 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:09:02.48 +01:46:02.0: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:04:07.99 -02:38:37.8: 13.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:15:25.15 -04:00:37.8: 14.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:39:25.09 -05:15:11.6: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:17:59.80 -02:36:24.8: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:11:13.02 -04:19:25.4: 14.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:25.15 -04:00:37.8: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1875 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:04:07.99 -02:38:37.8: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=14.1266 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:17:59.80 -02:36:24.8: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1794 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:39:25.09 -05:15:11.6: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0108 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:11:13.02 -04:19:25.4: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2361 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:04:01.73 -03:13:40.7: 13.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:04:01.73 -03:13:40.7: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1308 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:51:16.36 -06:17:34.4: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:51:16.36 -06:17:34.4: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1455 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:09:02.48 +01:46:02.0: 13.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:09:02.48 +01:46:02.0: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1652 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:50:50.50 -01:44:46.7: 14.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:56:06.55 -03:31:27.6: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:52:56.39 -03:58:52.7: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:04:31.39 -03:52:12.4: 13.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:00:11.72 +02:38:53.2: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:15:39.02 -02:16:31.7: 14.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:50:50.50 -01:44:46.7: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:59:30.43 -00:54:55.5: 14.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:56:06.55 -03:31:27.6: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:50:50.50 -01:44:46.7: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2098 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:00:11.72 +02:38:53.2: 13.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:00:11.72 +02:38:53.2: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1948 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:52:56.39 -03:58:52.7: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:52:56.39 -03:58:52.7: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0888 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:04:31.39 -03:52:12.4: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 23:27:33.91 +02:02:16.3: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:04:31.39 -03:52:12.4: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2077 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:15:39.02 -02:16:31.7: 14.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:39.02 -02:16:31.7: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.3051 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:57:53.76 +02:13:38.0: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:59:30.43 -00:54:55.5: 14.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:59:30.43 -00:54:55.5: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2713 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 23:27:33.91 +02:02:16.3: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0012_stack2.fits at 22:58:02.32 +02:57:45.7: 15.35 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:57:53.76 +02:13:38.0: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:57:53.76 +02:13:38.0: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2573 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-54-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0013_stack2.fits at 22:58:02.32 +02:57:45.7: 15.62 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:58:02.32 +02:57:45.7: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8788 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54015.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54387.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54720.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53255_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53255_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53260_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53260_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53262_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53262_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53264_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53264_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53265_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53265_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53266_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53266_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53271_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53271_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53277_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53277_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53285_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53285_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53288_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53288_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53289_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53289_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53290_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53290_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53291_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53291_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53293_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53293_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53294_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53294_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53295_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53295_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53296_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53296_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53297_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53297_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53303_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53303_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53305_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53305_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53307_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53307_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53308_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53308_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53312_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53312_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53313_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53313_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53314_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53314_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53567_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53567_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53620_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53620_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53669_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53669_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53678_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53678_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53725_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53725_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53759_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53759_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53766_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53766_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53780_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53780_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53782_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53782_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:13:21.41 +02:39:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53803_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53803_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53819_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53819_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53827_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53827_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53866_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53866_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53934_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53934_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53973_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53973_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53997_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53997_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54010_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54010_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54015_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 54015_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54016_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54016_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54033_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54033_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:31:37.19 -04:06:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54049_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54049_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54051_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54051_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54067_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54067_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54080_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54080_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54097_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54097_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54100_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54100_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54138_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54138_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54146_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54146_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54151_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54151_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54177_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54177_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54178_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54178_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54202_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54202_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54205_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54205_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54233_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54233_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54255_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54255_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54266_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54266_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54318_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54318_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54328_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54328_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54356_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54356_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54366_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54366_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54387_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 54387_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54390_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54390_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:15:41.22 -03:29:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54407_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54407_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54464_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54464_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54499_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54499_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54720_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 54720_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54759_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54759_fd_Psc-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-47-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks