NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Tau-08-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.42345    2461248.92345    13.34    04:29:56.70 +05:13:56.8   6716 2849   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.35    04:29:56.76 +05:13:56.9   6715 2852   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 27.4237  2461248.9237  13.35  04:29:56.73 +05:13:56.9
189.97030 -28.13050 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 3.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
181 Eucharis                 1     -1       1  13.6     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits at 04:29:56.73 +05:13:56.9:  16.34 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits at 04:29:56.73 +05:13:56.9:  16.29 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-08-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Tau-08-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits
Field Tau-08-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits
Field Tau-08-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Field Tau-08-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Tau-08-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Tau-08-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Tau-08-Q1b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 73469 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 73469 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits_preview.png'
Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits

renamed 'Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits_preview.png'
Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 20.0335 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 555.8924 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1720.4616 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 540.4536 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1714.2434 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 540.4266 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 85.8792 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 23.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-27T05:09:35.8640140' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-27T10:09:35.8640140' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61248.4233317594 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-27T10:09:45.7691051' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61248.4234464006 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 64.2835277270812 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 6.00003172865384 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 20.7919444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 96.7608333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.79798431549903 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-08' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 17 09' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+06 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29518 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29518 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 60.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 23.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 52.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/d_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits :) Spent 0.845250 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/d_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 23.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-27T05:10:19.2593326' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-27T10:10:19.2593326' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61248.4238340161 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-27T10:10:29.1674627' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61248.4239486922 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 64.2835276540203 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 6.0000317049141 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 20.9436111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 96.8697222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.77893047771329 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-08' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 17 09' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+06 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29518 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29518 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 60.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 23.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 52.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/d_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits :) Spent 0.867166 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/d_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits


fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461248.92344750 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits' wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:17:13.736 +05:58:22.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Image size: 942.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:17:13.946 +05:59:57.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:17:13.736 +05:58:22.00 Second-epoch image center 04:17:13.946 +05:59:57.83 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0266 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Image size: 942.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:17:14.384 +05:59:36.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:17:13.736 +05:58:22.00 Second-epoch image center 04:17:14.384 +05:59:36.60 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0209 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:17:13.946 +05:59:57.83 Second-epoch second image center 04:17:14.384 +05:59:36.60 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00617 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.feoTpYPImC Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P4XTk6XQPO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tHepuh5fNo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vi8QOfdxPU Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 12697 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3063 to 72.2803 deg, Dec +0.6733 to +11.2592 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3063 to 72.2803 deg, Dec 0.6733 to 11.2592 deg Loaded 5026 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4090 out of 4400 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4400 out of 12697 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.898900 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.898900 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 12697 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3063 to 72.2803 deg, Dec +0.6733 to +11.2592 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3063 to 72.2803 deg, Dec 0.6733 to 11.2592 deg Loaded 5026 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4090 out of 4400 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4400 out of 12697 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 12732 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3093 to 72.2942 deg, Dec +0.6840 to +11.2690 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3093 to 72.2942 deg, Dec 0.6840 to 11.2690 deg Loaded 5024 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4084 out of 4395 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4395 out of 12732 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits 2.2 pix Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits 2.9 pix fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits 2.8 pix fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits 15.7 mag. Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.feoTpYPImC (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits 860.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits' This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=931, bad_region=0, passed=12697 Got 12697 stars (including 11749 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12697 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 983 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 983 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 983 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12477 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 983 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 983 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12474 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 983 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12474 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 983 stars left (next iteration limit 1081) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits N_match=983 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=261 n_q2=223 n_q3=280 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.P4XTk6XQPO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits 860.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits' This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=938, bad_region=0, passed=12732 Got 12732 stars (including 11775 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12732 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12520 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12520 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12520 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.239 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.191 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.209 n_q1=258 n_q2=223 n_q3=281 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.422 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.tHepuh5fNo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=237, bad_region=0, passed=4969 Got 4969 stars (including 4729 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4969 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4925 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4926 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4926 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=970 robust_rms=10.237 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=970 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=970 robust_rms_before=0.911 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.302 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.415 arcsec SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.302 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=218 n_q2=261 n_q3=229 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Vi8QOfdxPU (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=241, bad_region=0, passed=5032 Got 5032 stars (including 4788 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5032 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4982 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4982 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4982 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=970 robust_rms=10.313 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=970 robust_rms=0.427 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=970 robust_rms_before=0.930 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.308 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.427 arcsec SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.308 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=219 n_q2=266 n_q3=228 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.250 worst_q_ratio=1.162 ref2=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.239 worst_q_ratio=1.422 new1=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits sigma_overall=0.301 worst_q_ratio=1.140 new2=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.251 reference average sigma_overall=0.2445 worst_q_ratio=1.292 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (983 matched stars from wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (981 matched stars from wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20738_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 20738_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    11.08    04:23:24.08 +06:34:31.9   5688 3599   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits **** FOUND 04:23:24.09 +06:34:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20770_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 20770_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    11.61    04:01:41.22 +09:59:11.6   2342 5482   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits **** FOUND 04:01:41.22 +09:59:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01183_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 01183_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    9.64    04:28:17.88 +10:09:43.3   6289 5807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits **** FOUND 04:28:17.88 +10:09:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:17:13.736 +05:58:22.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Image size: 942.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:17:13.946 +05:59:57.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:17:13.736 +05:58:22.00 Second-epoch image center 04:17:13.946 +05:59:57.83 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0266 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Image size: 942.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:17:14.384 +05:59:36.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:17:13.736 +05:58:22.00 Second-epoch image center 04:17:14.384 +05:59:36.60 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0209 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:17:13.946 +05:59:57.83 Second-epoch second image center 04:17:14.384 +05:59:36.60 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00617 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4Z9b3meBfs Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NOwJGSbhNF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iEkqSKC0yG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PPMj8B1kY2 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 66025 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3009 to 72.2822 deg, Dec +0.6715 to +11.2634 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3009 to 72.2822 deg, Dec 0.6715 to 11.2634 deg Loaded 5033 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3602 out of 4403 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4403 out of 66025 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.789950 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.789950 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.92 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.87 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.87
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 66025 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3009 to 72.2822 deg, Dec +0.6715 to +11.2634 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3009 to 72.2822 deg, Dec 0.6715 to 11.2634 deg Loaded 5033 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3602 out of 4403 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4403 out of 66025 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 66054 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3093 to 72.2941 deg, Dec +0.6749 to +11.2690 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3093 to 72.2941 deg, Dec 0.6749 to 11.2690 deg Loaded 5031 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3601 out of 4399 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4399 out of 66054 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits 2.2 pix Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits 2.7 pix fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits 2.7 pix fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.9 mag. Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits 15.9 mag. Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.4Z9b3meBfs (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits 860.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits' This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=4643, bad_region=10, passed=66006 Got 66006 stars (including 61258 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66006 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 975 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64890 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 982 stars left (next iteration limit 1080) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits N_match=982 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.211 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.203 n_q1=260 n_q2=226 n_q3=279 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.NOwJGSbhNF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits 860.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits' This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=4815, bad_region=9, passed=66025 Got 66025 stars (including 61111 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66025 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.239 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.195 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.203 n_q1=259 n_q2=231 n_q3=279 n_q4=212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.333 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.iEkqSKC0yG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=959, bad_region=5, passed=27017 Got 27017 stars (including 26009 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27017 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26755 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26757 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26757 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=215 n_q2=254 n_q3=236 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.PPMj8B1kY2 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=817, bad_region=4, passed=26903 Got 26903 stars (including 26041 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26903 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26599 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26602 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26602 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=220 n_q2=259 n_q3=234 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits at 04:08:53.50 +01:20:36.0: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits at 04:02:02.27 +03:55:38.0: 13.26 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits at 03:56:45.92 +07:56:27.8: 13.75 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits at 04:08:53.50 +01:20:36.0: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits at 03:56:45.92 +07:56:27.8: 13.67 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:53.50 +01:20:36.0: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5878 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits at 04:02:02.27 +03:55:38.0: 13.26 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:45.92 +07:56:27.8: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8034 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits at 04:26:53.73 +07:07:14.0: 12.76 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:02.27 +03:55:38.0: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.6515 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits at 03:46:53.16 +04:52:00.7: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits at 04:29:56.73 +05:13:56.9: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits at 04:21:10.90 +01:12:54.0: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits at 04:26:53.73 +07:07:14.0: 12.78 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:53.73 +07:07:14.0: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7954 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits at 04:09:47.15 +03:20:04.1: 13.35 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits at 04:02:29.83 +08:41:58.5: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits at 04:29:56.73 +05:13:56.9: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits at 03:56:39.52 +03:01:56.5: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits at 03:46:53.16 +04:52:00.7: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits at 03:57:46.55 +05:27:52.7: 13.66 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:53.16 +04:52:00.7: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5486 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits at 04:21:10.90 +01:12:54.0: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:10.90 +01:12:54.0: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2223 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits at 04:09:47.15 +03:20:04.1: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits at 04:02:29.83 +08:41:58.5: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:47.15 +03:20:04.1: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4734 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits at 04:16:21.75 +07:08:26.3: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:29.83 +08:41:58.5: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6478 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits at 03:56:39.52 +03:01:56.5: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits at 03:57:46.55 +05:27:52.7: 13.61 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:39.52 +03:01:56.5: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4157 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:46.55 +05:27:52.7: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6019 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits at 04:16:21.75 +07:08:26.3: 13.63 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:21.75 +07:08:26.3: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4953 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits at 04:34:07.70 +06:25:44.0: 13.71 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits at 04:07:19.65 +07:34:32.2: 13.49 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits at 04:26:05.83 +04:20:36.8: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-33-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0192_stack2.fits at 04:11:00.92 +07:18:04.5: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits at 04:34:07.70 +06:25:44.0: 13.64 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:07.70 +06:25:44.0: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5769 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits at 04:07:19.65 +07:34:32.2: 13.43 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:19.65 +07:34:32.2: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9016 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits at 04:11:00.92 +07:18:04.5: 13.88 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_stack2.fits at 04:26:05.83 +04:20:36.8: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:00.92 +07:18:04.5: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8791 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:05.83 +04:20:36.8: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8399 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81779.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81100_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81100_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.42345    2461248.92345    13.67    04:02:02.25 +03:55:38.1   2577 1824   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.64    04:02:02.29 +03:55:38.0   2576 1827   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81103_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81103_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.42345    2461248.92345    13.80    03:56:45.91 +07:56:26.7   1667 4207   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.80    03:56:45.93 +07:56:29.0   1665 4211   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81104_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81104_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.49    04:10:14.95 +05:21:03.0   3766 2751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits **** FOUND 04:10:14.92 +05:21:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81113_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81113_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    12.80    04:39:00.33 +06:40:08.5   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81114_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81114_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.42345    2461248.92345    12.58    04:08:53.53 +01:20:36.1   3688 0318   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    12.59    04:08:53.47 +01:20:35.9   3687 0321   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81192_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81192_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    10.85    04:10:31.44 +07:55:08.3   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81231_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81231_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    11.24    04:13:13.87 +03:47:37.6   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81236_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81236_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    11.45    04:06:19.77 +08:26:15.3   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81244_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81244_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    11.28    04:22:55.39 +03:26:13.5   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81248_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81248_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    11.55    04:09:17.50 +10:44:03.3   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81253_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81253_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    11.50    04:21:13.91 +09:52:45.5   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81258_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81258_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    11.68    04:01:41.20 +09:59:11.5   2342 5482   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits **** FOUND 04:01:41.20 +09:59:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81291_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81291_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    11.82    04:21:47.58 +09:37:40.0   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81311_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81311_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    11.89    04:13:19.94 +02:50:35.1   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81351_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81351_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    11.93    04:39:05.12 +02:48:36.5   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81406_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81406_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    12.38    04:34:45.27 +05:55:23.1   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81431_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81431_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    12.59    03:52:52.11 +03:34:01.6   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81505_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81505_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.42345    2461248.92345    12.85    04:26:53.69 +07:07:14.0   6191 3955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    12.76    04:26:53.76 +07:07:14.0   6190 3959   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81518_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81518_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.24    03:55:45.06 +10:01:54.7   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81529_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81529_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.08    03:54:47.34 +09:11:53.3   1331 4960   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits **** FOUND 03:54:47.34 +09:11:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81533_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81533_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    12.89    03:47:48.41 +01:18:59.1   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81545_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81545_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    12.94    04:17:17.70 +05:16:58.8   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81551_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81551_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    12.89    04:09:27.55 +02:42:43.4   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81554_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81554_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.10    04:33:58.10 +10:13:51.0   7130 5908   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits **** FOUND 04:33:58.23 +10:13:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81575_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81575_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.30    04:11:16.81 +09:02:49.1   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81593_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81593_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.11    04:46:29.39 +07:31:54.7   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81694_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81694_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.42345    2461248.92345    13.51    03:46:53.19 +04:52:00.5   0249 2277   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.60    03:46:53.13 +04:52:00.8   0248 2281   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81779_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 Preparing report for the candidate 81779_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81788_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81788_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.25    04:21:07.76 +01:12:50.7   5535 0349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits **** FOUND 04:21:07.77 +01:12:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81794_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81794_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.42345    2461248.92345    13.29    04:21:10.91 +01:12:54.1   5545 0347   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.18    04:21:10.88 +01:12:53.9   5543 0350   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81804_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81804_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.42345    2461248.92345    13.47    04:09:47.19 +03:20:04.4   3761 1530   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.48    04:09:47.12 +03:20:03.7   3760 1533   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81805_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81805_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.42345    2461248.92345    13.65    04:02:29.69 +08:41:57.8   2504 4705   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.65    04:02:29.97 +08:41:59.2   2503 4708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81806_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81806_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.41    04:38:19.47 +08:19:15.7   7855 4798   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits **** FOUND 04:38:19.46 +08:19:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81814_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81814_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.42345    2461248.92345    13.52    03:56:39.53 +03:01:56.4   1788 1239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.35    03:56:39.51 +03:01:56.7   1787 1242   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81819_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81819_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.37    04:38:35.40 +06:51:45.9   7952 3920   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits **** FOUND 04:38:35.43 +06:51:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81845_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81845_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.42345    2461248.92345    13.65    03:57:46.59 +05:27:52.0   1890 2718   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.57    03:57:46.51 +05:27:53.4   1888 2722   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81853_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81853_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.42345    2461248.92345    13.59    04:16:21.75 +07:08:25.7   4621 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.43    04:16:21.75 +07:08:26.9   4620 3877   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81873_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81873_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.61    04:29:36.21 +10:30:51.2   6470 6034   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits **** FOUND 04:29:36.16 +10:30:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81874_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81874_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.81    03:49:11.36 +10:29:15.0   0449 5716   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81876_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81876_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.25    04:25:49.99 +01:07:11.8   6248 0333   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits **** FOUND 04:25:50.03 +01:07:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81882_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81882_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.49    03:51:28.62 +05:11:08.0   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81919_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81919_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.42345    2461248.92345    13.58    04:34:07.73 +06:25:43.3   7299 3609   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.57    04:34:07.67 +06:25:44.7   7298 3613   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81930_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81930_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.42345    2461248.92345    13.82    04:07:19.66 +07:34:30.6   3261 4062   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    14.03    04:07:19.64 +07:34:33.7   3259 4066   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81947_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 81947_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.73    04:11:09.83 +04:29:02.0   3930 2237   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82000_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 82000_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.68    03:50:40.87 +02:42:34.7   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82007_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 82007_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.42345    2461248.92345    13.82    04:26:05.82 +04:20:37.4   6172 2279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.86    04:26:05.85 +04:20:36.2   6171 2282   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82009_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 82009_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.42345    2461248.92345    13.99    04:11:00.86 +07:18:04.3   3819 3926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-09-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.80    04:11:00.98 +07:18:04.7   3818 3929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82010_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 82010_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    14.16    03:52:08.25 +04:22:56.6   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82014_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 82014_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.58    04:41:46.55 +03:10:56.7   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82028_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 82028_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.96    04:26:40.15 +09:24:42.7   6074 5337   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits **** FOUND 04:26:40.13 +09:24:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82038_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 82038_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    14.51    03:48:12.21 +10:21:46.3   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82045_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 82045_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    14.18    04:16:24.24 +11:04:01.2   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82056_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 82056_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    14.07    03:46:56.20 +08:07:39.6   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82059_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 82059_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.59    04:20:59.35 +01:02:57.4   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82067_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 82067_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    14.15    04:29:54.88 +10:16:26.3   6525 5891   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits **** FOUND 04:29:54.86 +10:16:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82079_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 82079_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    13.95    03:51:24.52 +01:23:54.7   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82080_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 82080_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    14.46    03:46:17.15 +03:31:06.7   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82086_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 82086_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    14.27    03:47:57.45 +07:17:04.0   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82096_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 82096_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    14.05    03:56:10.44 +02:40:57.9   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51684_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 51684_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    11.64    04:31:31.30 +02:10:21.9   7067 1021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits **** FOUND 04:31:31.31 +02:10:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 05240_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 05240_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    9.83    04:28:17.87 +10:09:43.0   6289 5807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits **** FOUND 04:28:17.87 +10:09:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30643_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 The candidate 30643_fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 27.42395    2461248.92395    11.24    04:23:24.06 +06:34:31.7   5688 3599   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_052325_TTUQ1b1x1_1571237_yWf4JLCn/fd_Tau-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-10-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits **** FOUND 04:23:24.07 +06:34:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 04:29:56.73 +05:13:56.9 ########### Completed Tau-08-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 04:29:56.73 +05:13:56.9 ################################################################################### 04:29:56.73 +05:13:56.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461248.92344750 -observatory V36 07:09:59.40 +19:08:03.9 Mercury (1.1mag) 11:19:42.04 +04:43:15.9 Venus (-4.2mag) 05:14:42.17 +23:03:31.4 Mars (1.3mag) 08:32:14.64 +19:19:49.1 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:49.18 +03:21:23.2 Saturn (0.7mag) 04:10:09.87 +20:52:52.0 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:39.83 +00:17:23.8 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:29:17.11 -23:25:25.1 Pluto (14.4mag) 18:40:33.15 -27:35:31.8 Moon (-12.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 27 05:35 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461248.92344750: 08:32:10.04 +19:20:08.9 Io (6.0mag) 08:32:07.00 +19:20:21.5 Europa (6.3mag) 08:32:07.84 +19:20:14.7 Ganymede (5.5mag) 08:32:41.24 +19:18:00.8 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:30:05.63 +19:12:18.1 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:32:19.10 +19:19:31.5 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:29:30.12 +19:13:10.2 Elara (17.7mag) 08:36:12.42 +19:05:03.1 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:36:11.20 +19:27:42.1 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:42.30 +03:20:59.6 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:47.80 +03:21:33.0 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:56:26.62 +03:18:44.1 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:57:04.42 +03:21:01.1 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:27.08 +03:16:10.1 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 27 05:35 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461248.92344750: 18:21:24.98 -28:06:47.9 JWST 18:25:29.77 +21:29:24.5 Chandra 11:06:07.88 -59:54:09.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 27 05:35 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461248.92344750 -observatory V36 02:59:25.29 +16:17:53.1 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:06:36.80 -34:38:27.8 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:42:33.35 -68:30:50.5 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:06:26.27 +32:45:19.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:05:03.75 +30:37:48.4 16.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:47:58.36 +32:00:07.7 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:31:18.37 +26:43:42.9 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:10:43.88 +29:00:21.4 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:20:57.49 +05:14:12.1 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:11:09.68 -11:51:39.6 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:26:51.53 +67:03:01.8 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:01:57.06 -11:48:33.8 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:31:31.27 +66:42:24.9 18.0mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:54:21.02 +30:49:01.4 15.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:09:38.07 +15:36:02.4 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:18:39.03 +42:04:25.6 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:27:22.78 +48:13:16.9 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:05:13.76 -13:11:14.7 15.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:48:01.22 +26:11:56.3 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:25:04.25 -14:38:04.5 17.3mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:17:02.24 +21:36:13.3 17.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:51:39.73 +03:04:58.6 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:13:10.79 +78:45:17.6 17.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:01:19.28 +45:53:00.5 16.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:37:26.35 +07:09:37.4 17.2mag A/2026 E1 21:43:57.55 -22:05:59.2 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:22:09.88 -02:42:50.0 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:24:01.04 +31:19:26.6 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:43:30.77 +08:30:05.2 17.2mag 63P/Wild 00:53:35.26 -05:07:50.2 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 05:08:14.36 +20:44:02.9 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:47:18.65 +12:39:38.0 16.5mag 88P/Howell 07:24:35.22 +29:06:22.8 16.0mag 93P/Lovas 03:34:12.03 +12:21:08.6 17.9mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 05:17:15.61 +31:10:33.2 16.5mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:50:14.52 +28:30:52.7 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:20:32.27 -05:40:06.5 17.0mag 124P/Mrkos 05:18:42.65 +21:08:47.9 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:07:47.59 +19:22:43.9 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 08:11:17.79 +13:06:30.8 17.6mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:21:27.83 -19:47:31.1 16.9mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:34:34.95 +36:48:42.6 15.6mag 162P/SidingSpring 17:47:29.82 +28:55:02.0 13.2mag 169P/NEAT 02:19:41.01 +09:04:45.6 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:36:57.48 -09:16:38.9 17.4mag 235P/LINEAR 20:31:12.41 -52:21:57.6 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:47:49.57 +19:59:39.3 15.5mag 260P/McNaught 06:29:25.52 +37:43:41.2 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:07:33.55 +04:24:19.6 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 08:50:05.83 +18:56:16.3 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:18:08.01 +37:45:59.9 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Jul 27 05:35 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 27 05:35 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 27 05:35 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:56:54.106 -10:42:50.84 AT 2026ucc 2026-07-09.34 22.2051 22:53:25.731 -02:38:45.64 AT 2026ucb 2026-07-09.35 22.3845 20:21:20.446 -12:55:24.01 AT 2026uca 2026-07-09.24 22.8887 23:17:51.308 -00:47:18.69 AT 2026ubz 2026-07-09.38 21.8767 22:50:38.435 -08:50:23.60 AT 2026uby 2026-07-09.34 22.2275 22:47:24.698 -06:06:23.35 AT 2026ubx 2026-07-09.34 23.256 22:56:00.968 -11:40:11.78 AT 2026ubw 2026-07-09.34 22.1585 23:24:42.862 +02:16:46.36 AT 2026ubv 2026-07-09.41 22.7993 22:45:14.951 -12:30:44.06 AT 2026ubu 2026-07-07.42 23.0269 21:48:25.112 -16:15:06.82 AT 2026ubt 2026-07-07.42 22.6297 22:49:23.723 -15:30:28.94 AT 2026ubs 2026-07-07.41 23.1172 22:47:25.707 -13:21:20.99 AT 2026ubr 2026-07-07.42 22.9851 22:48:27.713 -14:51:00.69 AT 2026ubq 2026-07-07.41 23.5158 22:55:15.603 -17:20:52.24 AT 2026ubp 2026-07-07.41 22.73 00:01:17.781 -03:06:59.77 AT 2026ubo 2026-06-30.36 21.0986 23:48:53.692 +00:34:05.28 AT 2026ubn 2026-06-30.37 21.2974 23:55:47.866 +01:29:21.94 AT 2026ubm 2026-06-30.37 22.7418 23:56:07.829 -00:07:55.59 AT 2026ubl 2026-06-30.36 22.5755 22:50:20.382 -04:24:01.18 AT 2026ubk 2026-06-30.33 21.8405 23:52:09.876 +01:40:51.93 AT 2026ubj 2026-06-30.37 22.5344 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 27 05:35 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 92 C