This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3921* 04 10 10.19 +20 52 53.1 7.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8921,6.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3921 6.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3921* 04 10 10.18 +20 52 53.8 7.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8921,7.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3921 7.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3921 2461248.8921 12.08 03:45:30.23 +23:31:01.0
166.73461 -24.19517 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis -0 -1 1 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:45:30.23 +23:31:01.0: 16.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:45:30.23 +23:31:01.0: 16.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3921* 03 45 30.23 +23 31 01.0 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8921,12.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3921 12.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3921 2461248.8921 12.90 03:39:06.05 +22:19:53.5
166.39417 -26.06164 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -1 -2 2 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:39:06.05 +22:19:53.5: 16.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:39:06.05 +22:19:53.5: 16.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3921* 03 39 06.05 +22 19 53.5 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8921,12.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3921 12.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3921 2461248.8921 13.75 03:58:16.59 +18:38:47.2
172.82985 -25.62236 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata 1 -1 2 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:58:16.59 +18:38:47.2: 16.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:58:16.59 +18:38:47.2: 16.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3921* 03 58 16.59 +18 38 47.2 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8921,13.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3921 13.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3921 2461248.8921 14.04 03:22:13.72 +18:50:40.6
165.55122 -31.27666 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.83 Beatrix -2 -1 2 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:22:13.72 +18:50:40.6: 16.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:22:13.72 +18:50:40.6: 16.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3921* 03 22 13.72 +18 50 40.6 14.0 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8921,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3921 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3921 2461248.8921 13.95 03:52:53.55 +23:28:16.1
168.12416 -23.07650 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -1 -2 3 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:52:53.55 +23:28:16.1: 16.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:52:53.55 +23:28:16.1: 16.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3921* 03 52 53.55 +23 28 16.1 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8921,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3921 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3921 2461248.8921 13.57 03:41:16.93 +23:33:10.2
165.91591 -24.81374 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana 2 2 3 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:41:16.93 +23:33:10.2: 14.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:41:16.93 +23:33:10.2: 14.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3921* 03 41 16.93 +23 33 10.2 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8921,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3921 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Last image: 2461248.89245988 27.07.2026 09:24:58.534 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.05
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15849
Objects passed selection criteria: 15768
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11083
Average stars matched: 10853.2 (97.927 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 241072 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 27 07:13:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Last image: 2461248.89245988 27.07.2026 09:24:58.534 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 87
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 82402
Objects passed selection criteria: 82146
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 60251.8
Average stars matched: 58335.2 (96.8192 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2241684 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 27 07:18:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461248.89178124
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits'
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:54.631 +21:59:59.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:54.631 +21:59:59.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0827 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:51.751 +22:00:31.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:51.751 +22:00:31.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0723 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:54.631 +21:59:59.29
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:51.751 +22:00:31.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01430 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OPEUs7DjyP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lXkdxvvIT6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LKbI10tvQW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LCBpo1RSfU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16676 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2944 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2944 deg
Loaded 6147 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4732 out of 5194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5194 out of 16676 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.916900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.916900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.05
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.87
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.87
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16676 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2944 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2944 deg
Loaded 6147 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4732 out of 5194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5194 out of 16676 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 16620 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6517 to 64.2526 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6517 to 64.2526 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4726 out of 5194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5194 out of 16620 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
2.1 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
15.9 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OPEUs7DjyP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1342, bad_region=0, passed=16676
Got 16676 stars (including 15307 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16676 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16399 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.197 n_q1=282 n_q2=271 n_q3=184 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lXkdxvvIT6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1357, bad_region=0, passed=16620
Got 16620 stars (including 15249 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16620 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.202 n_q1=282 n_q2=272 n_q3=187 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LKbI10tvQW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=304, bad_region=1, passed=5614
Got 5614 stars (including 5298 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5614 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5491 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5491 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=963 robust_rms=8.052 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=963 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=963 robust_rms_before=1.214 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.389 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.346 arcsec
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:54.664 +21:59:58.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5614 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1277225.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 1.214 -> 0.346 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=216 n_q2=168 n_q3=263 n_q4=316 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LCBpo1RSfU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=313, bad_region=0, passed=5662
Got 5662 stars (including 5340 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5662 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=963 robust_rms=8.005 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=963 robust_rms=0.367 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=963 robust_rms_before=1.218 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.393 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.367 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.393 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=217 n_q2=171 n_q3=260 n_q4=315 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.249 worst_q_ratio=1.303
ref2=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.261 worst_q_ratio=1.171
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.079
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits sigma_overall=0.417 worst_q_ratio=1.102
reference average sigma_overall=0.255 worst_q_ratio=1.237
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20795_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
Preparing report for the candidate 20795_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20857_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 20857_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.57 +24:42:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10471_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 10471_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:39.41 +21:03:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:54.631 +21:59:59.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:54.631 +21:59:59.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0827 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:51.751 +22:00:31.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:51.751 +22:00:31.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0723 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:54.631 +21:59:59.29
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:51.751 +22:00:31.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01430 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iHQeqxH6TA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.S4suAmfwt4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y0N6qmm7Uy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JWD4McxYA7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 88883 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6567 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6567 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4048 out of 5195 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5195 out of 88883 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.811200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.811200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.03
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.03
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 88883 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6567 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6567 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4048 out of 5195 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5195 out of 88883 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 89152 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6517 to 64.2526 deg, Dec +16.4684 to +27.2928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6517 to 64.2526 deg, Dec 16.4684 to 27.2928 deg
Loaded 6156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4023 out of 5194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5194 out of 89152 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 83 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
2.1 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
16.0 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
16.0 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.iHQeqxH6TA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=7709, bad_region=6, passed=88848
Got 88848 stars (including 81003 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88848 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.194 n_q1=275 n_q2=261 n_q3=193 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.S4suAmfwt4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=39, blended=7668, bad_region=7, passed=89113
Got 89113 stars (including 81303 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 89113 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.202 n_q1=274 n_q2=267 n_q3=197 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y0N6qmm7Uy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1062, bad_region=4, passed=32031
Got 32031 stars (including 30920 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=224 n_q2=171 n_q3=261 n_q4=306 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JWD4McxYA7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1114, bad_region=3, passed=32515
Got 32515 stars (including 31344 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32515 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=224 n_q2=173 n_q3=263 n_q4=301 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.057
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-23-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042624_TTUQ1b1x1_1533948_mgFE96b8/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:21:01.24 +25:02:50.7: 13.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:15:47.30 +21:11:22.3: 13.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:14:21.98 +23:41:22.6: 13.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:40:38.91 +26:40:36.0: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:25:37.65 +22:13:18.1: 13.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:19:11.75 +23:29:10.0: 13.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:21:01.24 +25:02:50.7: 13.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:21:01.24 +25:02:50.7: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.4924 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:15:47.30 +21:11:22.3: 13.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:45:30.23 +23:31:01.0: 16.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:14:21.98 +23:41:22.6: 13.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:15:47.30 +21:11:22.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7136 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:40:38.91 +26:40:36.0: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:21.98 +23:41:22.6: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9098 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:25:37.65 +22:13:18.1: 13.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:38.91 +26:40:36.0: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.7197 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:37.65 +22:13:18.1: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.5669 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:19:11.75 +23:29:10.0: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:19:11.75 +23:29:10.0: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3010 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:45:30.23 +23:31:01.0: 16.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:10:20.35 +26:05:52.3: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:48:54.44 +23:50:01.1: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:51:30.83 +25:08:23.2: 12.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:42:21.41 +19:39:45.0: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:48:54.44 +23:50:01.1: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:54.44 +23:50:01.1: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3526 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:10:20.35 +26:05:52.3: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:20.35 +26:05:52.3: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.4057 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:39:54.71 +25:11:44.6: 12.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:39:06.05 +22:19:53.5: 16.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 04:16:44.84 +26:19:52.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:51:30.83 +25:08:23.2: 12.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:30.83 +25:08:23.2: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6199 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:42:21.41 +19:39:45.0: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:59:07.51 +23:38:20.7: 12.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:21.41 +19:39:45.0: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4132 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:39:54.71 +25:11:44.6: 12.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:39:06.05 +22:19:53.5: 16.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:54.71 +25:11:44.6: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7930 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 04:16:44.84 +26:19:52.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:44.84 +26:19:52.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:59:07.51 +23:38:20.7: 12.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:07.51 +23:38:20.7: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8310 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:56:01.92 +20:46:40.5: 12.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:56:01.92 +20:46:40.5: 12.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:01.92 +20:46:40.5: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8767 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:59:08.23 +23:38:38.8: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 04:16:45.08 +26:22:04.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:36:51.39 +23:11:58.6: 13.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:59:08.23 +23:38:38.8: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:08.23 +23:38:38.8: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1740 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:42:50.27 +24:29:28.2: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 04:16:45.08 +26:22:04.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:45.08 +26:22:04.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:36:51.39 +23:11:58.6: 13.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:36:51.39 +23:11:58.6: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3448 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:39:10.02 +24:43:28.4: 13.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:42:50.27 +24:29:28.2: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:50.27 +24:29:28.2: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2936 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:55:12.99 +23:35:59.1: 13.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:50:31.47 +24:31:43.1: 13.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:34:24.15 +22:45:54.6: 13.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:39:10.02 +24:43:28.4: 13.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:10.02 +24:43:28.4: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2782 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:50:31.47 +24:31:43.1: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:31.47 +24:31:43.1: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2466 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:55:12.99 +23:35:59.1: 13.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:12.99 +23:35:59.1: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2103 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:34:24.15 +22:45:54.6: 13.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:24.15 +22:45:54.6: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3408 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:49:42.96 +21:10:22.9: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:23:05.69 +26:52:35.2: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:45:41.99 +24:55:06.7: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:49:42.96 +21:10:22.9: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:42.96 +21:10:22.9: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2756 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:23:05.69 +26:52:35.2: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:05.69 +26:52:35.2: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5031 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:45:41.99 +24:55:06.7: 13.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:41.99 +24:55:06.7: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5139 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:46:19.02 +19:36:43.5: 13.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:38:17.62 +25:04:04.5: 13.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:46:19.02 +19:36:43.5: 13.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:19.02 +19:36:43.5: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4816 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:17:57.76 +21:36:12.8: 13.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:31:18.65 +17:58:02.1: 13.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:51:23.46 +24:31:32.8: 13.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:38:17.62 +25:04:04.5: 13.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:17.62 +25:04:04.5: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6361 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:34:58.91 +23:47:28.3: 13.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:49:20.70 +24:15:54.6: 13.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:17:57.76 +21:36:12.8: 13.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:31:18.65 +17:58:02.1: 13.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:57.76 +21:36:12.8: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7676 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:18.65 +17:58:02.1: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5442 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:51:23.46 +24:31:32.8: 13.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:23.46 +24:31:32.8: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6301 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:34:58.91 +23:47:28.3: 13.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:58.91 +23:47:28.3: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6783 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:49:20.70 +24:15:54.6: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:20.70 +24:15:54.6: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5901 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:41:23.41 +24:59:39.0: 13.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:50:51.63 +24:25:46.0: 13.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:46:17.24 +23:06:44.2: 14.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:41:23.41 +24:59:39.0: 13.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:23.41 +24:59:39.0: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8071 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:50:51.63 +24:25:46.0: 13.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:57:12.97 +25:15:27.7: 13.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:58:16.59 +18:38:47.2: 16.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:51.63 +24:25:46.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8413 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:22:13.72 +18:50:40.6: 16.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:46:17.24 +23:06:44.2: 14.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:17.24 +23:06:44.2: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9607 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:34:14.39 +24:34:48.2: 14.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:58:16.59 +18:38:47.2: 16.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:57:12.97 +25:15:27.7: 13.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:12.97 +25:15:27.7: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9073 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:22:13.72 +18:50:40.6: 16.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:52:53.55 +23:28:16.1: 16.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:34:14.39 +24:34:48.2: 14.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:14.39 +24:34:48.2: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1532 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:26:34.21 +21:58:09.7: 14.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:52:53.55 +23:28:16.1: 16.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_stack2.fits at 03:41:16.93 +23:33:10.2: 14.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:26:34.21 +21:58:09.7: 14.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:34.21 +21:58:09.7: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2175 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_stack2.fits at 03:41:16.93 +23:33:10.2: 14.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:41:16.93 +23:33:10.2: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5670 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105852.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105990.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106342.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106360.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106380.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36422.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105697_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105697_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105698_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105698_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105699_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105699_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105702_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105702_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105704_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105704_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105706_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105706_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105707_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105707_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:10:08.89 +19:34:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105709_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
Preparing report for the candidate 105709_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105727_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105727_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:14:18.87 +22:57:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105772_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105772_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.58 +24:42:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105801_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105801_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:23.14 +24:32:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105822_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105822_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:04.27 +25:32:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105852_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
Preparing report for the candidate 105852_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105861_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105861_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105890_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105890_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105900_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105900_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105908_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105908_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:59.84 +26:28:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105912_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105912_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:20.75 +24:28:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105929_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105929_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:20.06 +24:01:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105935_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105935_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105938_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105938_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:07.53 +24:00:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105966_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105966_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105977_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105977_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105990_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
Preparing report for the candidate 105990_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105999_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 105999_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106029_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106029_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106038_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106038_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:27:02.56 +24:51:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106050_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106050_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:15.33 +23:59:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106051_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106051_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:47.84 +18:26:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106054_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106054_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:28.68 +22:02:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106060_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106060_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:40.50 +23:40:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106078_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106078_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106086_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106086_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:16.76 +23:48:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106088_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106088_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106103_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106103_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106105_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106105_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:01.02 +24:05:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106106_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106106_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:47.14 +22:23:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106107_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106107_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:10:44.93 +21:52:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106111_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106111_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106117_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106117_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106119_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106119_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106124_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106124_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106131_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106131_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106134_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106134_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:22.90 +26:10:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106143_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106143_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:42.99 +18:12:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106144_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106144_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:11.62 +25:33:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106145_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106145_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:26.53 +25:41:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106148_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106148_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:56.23 +23:09:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106154_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106154_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:26.15 +17:35:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106171_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106171_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:11.27 +25:53:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106174_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106174_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106187_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106187_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:44.56 +20:24:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106188_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106188_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106191_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106191_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:55.27 +24:15:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106200_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106200_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:22:37.43 +24:53:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106201_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106201_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:12.51 +26:34:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:16.94 +25:20:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106217_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106217_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106222_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106222_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:04.01 +24:10:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106224_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106224_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:27.87 +20:49:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106234_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106234_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106238_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106238_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:11.19 +22:47:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106239_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106239_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106242_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106242_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106245_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106245_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:18:15.22 +24:03:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106251_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106251_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106254_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106254_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106261_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106261_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106283_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106283_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106287_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106287_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:02.09 +23:53:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106289_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106289_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:28.02 +23:53:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106298_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106298_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106317_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106317_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106332_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106332_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106333_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106333_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106342_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
Preparing report for the candidate 106342_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106360_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
Preparing report for the candidate 106360_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106378_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106378_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106380_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
Preparing report for the candidate 106380_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106397_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 106397_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36422_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
Preparing report for the candidate 36422_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79761_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 79761_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:48.25 +19:41:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55689_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271
The candidate 55689_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-24-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0271 did not pass the final checks
