This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3795 2461248.8795 12.92 04:19:50.45 +26:12:22.4
170.62677 -16.80641 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.63 Ausonia -0 -1 1 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:19:50.45 +26:12:22.4: 16.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:19:50.45 +26:12:22.4: 16.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3795* 04 19 50.45 +26 12 22.4 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8795,12.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3795 12.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3795 2461248.8795 12.68 04:00:44.24 +33:22:17.2
162.32471 -14.65415 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.980 Anacostia -1 0 1 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:00:44.24 +33:22:17.2: 15.75 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:00:44.24 +33:22:17.2: 15.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.76 +/- 0.13
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3795* 04 00 44.24 +33 22 17.2 12.7 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8795,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3795 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
Last image: 2461248.87981067 27.07.2026 09:06:45.642 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19286
Objects passed selection criteria: 19158
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12799.8
Average stars matched: 12497 (97.6347 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 244148 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 27 07:52:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
Last image: 2461248.87981067 27.07.2026 09:06:45.642 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 77
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 35 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 113083
Objects passed selection criteria: 112750
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 78285.8
Average stars matched: 75559.5 (96.5176 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1995328 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 27 07:58:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461248.87923455
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits'
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:17.573 +29:59:53.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09
Second-epoch image center 04:00:17.573 +29:59:53.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0647 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:20.543 +29:59:28.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09
Second-epoch image center 04:00:20.543 +29:59:28.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0758 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:00:17.573 +29:59:53.40
Second-epoch second image center 04:00:20.543 +29:59:28.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01282 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CnPJuPV1kp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bttzg5trFY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sqQobwLEyy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9S2TfRDa8T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 20483 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5843 to 69.6519 deg, Dec +24.3535 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5843 to 69.6519 deg, Dec 24.3535 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 7259 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5444 out of 6103 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6103 out of 20483 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.943150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.943150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.91
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.91
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 20483 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5843 to 69.6519 deg, Dec +24.3535 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5843 to 69.6519 deg, Dec 24.3535 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 7259 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5444 out of 6103 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6103 out of 20483 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 20420 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5745 to 69.6281 deg, Dec +24.3535 to +35.3110 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5745 to 69.6281 deg, Dec 24.3535 to 35.3110 deg
Loaded 7268 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5452 out of 6102 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6102 out of 20420 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
2.1 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
15.9 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.CnPJuPV1kp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1801, bad_region=0, passed=20483
Got 20483 stars (including 18665 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20483 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.228 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.212 n_q1=296 n_q2=224 n_q3=164 n_q4=289 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Bttzg5trFY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1773, bad_region=0, passed=20420
Got 20420 stars (including 18621 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.211 n_q1=295 n_q2=227 n_q3=159 n_q4=295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sqQobwLEyy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=283, bad_region=0, passed=5261
Got 5261 stars (including 4973 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5261 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5153 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=963 robust_rms=8.185 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=963 robust_rms=0.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=963 robust_rms_before=0.947 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.317 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.317 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=298 n_q2=152 n_q3=250 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9S2TfRDa8T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=291, bad_region=1, passed=5274
Got 5274 stars (including 4977 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5274 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=962 robust_rms=8.166 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=962 robust_rms=0.389 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=962 robust_rms_before=0.926 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.330 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.389 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.330 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=298 n_q2=150 n_q3=248 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.267 worst_q_ratio=1.215
ref2=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.260
new1=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.328 worst_q_ratio=1.041
new2=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits sigma_overall=0.330 worst_q_ratio=1.085
reference average sigma_overall=0.271 worst_q_ratio=1.2375
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:37:38.51 +32:37:26.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:37:38.51 +32:37:26.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:38.51 +32:37:26.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31141_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 31141_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13228_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 13228_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:57.44 +28:26:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:17.573 +29:59:53.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09
Second-epoch image center 04:00:17.573 +29:59:53.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0647 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:20.543 +29:59:28.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09
Second-epoch image center 04:00:20.543 +29:59:28.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0758 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:00:17.573 +29:59:53.40
Second-epoch second image center 04:00:20.543 +29:59:28.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01282 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PX12ieP5N7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9GcewFfRPy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4JC5bEqEZf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OcyMsNlqb2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 123891 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5593 to 69.6800 deg, Dec +24.3536 to +35.3064 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5593 to 69.6800 deg, Dec 24.3536 to 35.3064 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4380 out of 6104 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6104 out of 123891 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.817500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.817500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 123891 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5593 to 69.6800 deg, Dec +24.3536 to +35.3064 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5593 to 69.6800 deg, Dec 24.3536 to 35.3064 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4380 out of 6104 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6104 out of 123891 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 123506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5597 to 69.6801 deg, Dec +24.3536 to +35.3134 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5597 to 69.6801 deg, Dec 24.3536 to 35.3134 deg
Loaded 7288 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4373 out of 6107 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6107 out of 123506 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 73 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
2.1 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
16.1 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
16.1 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PX12ieP5N7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14140, bad_region=7, passed=123855
Got 123855 stars (including 109521 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 123855 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120443 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.219 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.206 n_q1=287 n_q2=233 n_q3=169 n_q4=287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.230
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9GcewFfRPy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=14006, bad_region=9, passed=123473
Got 123473 stars (including 109279 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 123473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.203 n_q1=286 n_q2=240 n_q3=169 n_q4=284 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.207
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4JC5bEqEZf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1196, bad_region=2, passed=33580
Got 33580 stars (including 32330 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33580 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=297 n_q2=146 n_q3=251 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.030
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OcyMsNlqb2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1231, bad_region=3, passed=34136
Got 34136 stars (including 32856 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34136 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33633 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33633 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=300 n_q2=146 n_q3=247 n_q4=272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-05-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040829_TTUQ1b1x1_2874169_3cz2OKvP/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:27:00.26 +29:11:00.5: 12.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:34:42.36 +34:03:43.1: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:40:07.59 +26:36:34.0: 11.79 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:45:00.62 +30:39:55.3: 12.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:32:17.85 +33:35:13.5: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:42:43.04 +28:28:40.0: 13.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:37:38.48 +32:37:26.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:52:17.41 +34:41:41.6: 12.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:42:25.61 +32:56:55.7: 11.12 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:27:00.26 +29:11:00.5: 12.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:42:43.04 +28:28:40.0: 13.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:32:17.85 +33:35:13.5: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:37:38.48 +32:37:26.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:38.48 +32:37:26.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:52:17.41 +34:41:41.6: 12.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:40:07.59 +26:36:34.0: 11.77 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:45:00.62 +30:39:55.3: 12.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:34:42.36 +34:03:43.1: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:00.26 +29:11:00.5: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0859 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:43.04 +28:28:40.0: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2926 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:17.85 +33:35:13.5: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2941 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:07.59 +26:36:34.0: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0244 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:17.41 +34:41:41.6: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7848 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:00.62 +30:39:55.3: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1125 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:42.36 +34:03:43.1: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8991 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:38:21.87 +34:00:30.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:42:25.61 +32:56:55.7: 11.11 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.11 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:25.61 +32:56:55.7: ref_mag=11.11 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2197 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:38:21.87 +34:00:30.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:21.87 +34:00:30.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:36:34.08 +29:14:36.7: 12.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:21:20.77 +34:34:51.9: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:37:35.84 +28:26:35.3: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:03:54.28 +28:08:19.8: 11.55 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:19:29.31 +30:51:26.1: 12.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:13:04.26 +32:29:43.1: 12.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:08:35.74 +33:42:35.8: 12.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:26:54.58 +34:46:59.7: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:37:35.84 +28:26:35.3: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:36:34.08 +29:14:36.7: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:21:20.77 +34:34:51.9: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:35.84 +28:26:35.3: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.4251 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:36:34.08 +29:14:36.7: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5099 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:20.77 +34:34:51.9: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3218 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:03:54.28 +28:08:19.8: 11.55 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:54.28 +28:08:19.8: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7857 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:16:05.43 +34:51:11.9: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:48:18.25 +27:39:02.6: 12.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:08:35.74 +33:42:35.8: 12.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:13:04.26 +32:29:43.1: 12.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:26:54.58 +34:46:59.7: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:19:29.31 +30:51:26.1: 12.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:35.74 +33:42:35.8: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7548 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:04.26 +32:29:43.1: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8339 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:54.58 +34:46:59.7: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2259 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:29.31 +30:51:26.1: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6602 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:16:05.43 +34:51:11.9: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:05.43 +34:51:11.9: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0092 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:48:18.25 +27:39:02.6: 12.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:18.25 +27:39:02.6: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0818 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:01:55.82 +31:58:48.3: 12.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:40:32.27 +29:55:51.0: 13.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:44:35.62 +27:52:31.0: 13.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:44:23.91 +32:10:59.3: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:55:53.10 +32:10:14.9: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:19:50.45 +26:12:22.4: 16.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:01:55.82 +31:58:48.3: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:55.82 +31:58:48.3: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0810 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:40:32.27 +29:55:51.0: 13.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:32.27 +29:55:51.0: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1922 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:19:50.45 +26:12:22.4: 16.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:44:23.91 +32:10:59.3: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:44:35.62 +27:52:31.0: 13.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:55:53.10 +32:10:14.9: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:23.91 +32:10:59.3: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2524 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:35.62 +27:52:31.0: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2403 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:53.10 +32:10:14.9: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2347 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:21:08.59 +30:57:43.8: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:15:54.35 +30:02:21.9: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:04:22.98 +32:58:01.9: 13.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:28:40.97 +30:22:47.1: 13.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:05:44.42 +34:13:10.8: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:52:28.86 +34:28:43.1: 13.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:21:08.59 +30:57:43.8: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:08.59 +30:57:43.8: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1643 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:15:54.35 +30:02:21.9: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:04:22.98 +32:58:01.9: 13.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:54.35 +30:02:21.9: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0749 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:22.98 +32:58:01.9: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3708 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:56:24.86 +35:07:02.3: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:03:19.62 +34:13:53.9: 13.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:14:02.70 +32:59:35.9: 13.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:28:40.97 +30:22:47.1: 13.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:05:44.42 +34:13:10.8: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:40.97 +30:22:47.1: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4459 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:52:28.86 +34:28:43.1: 13.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:44.42 +34:13:10.8: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3880 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:28.86 +34:28:43.1: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3891 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:03:19.62 +34:13:53.9: 13.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:19.62 +34:13:53.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5140 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:56:24.86 +35:07:02.3: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:24.86 +35:07:02.3: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5966 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:14:02.70 +32:59:35.9: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:02.70 +32:59:35.9: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4525 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:07:46.07 +33:41:30.9: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:50:54.46 +29:40:06.1: 13.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:18:36.67 +31:59:33.9: 13.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:49:42.92 +29:52:10.9: 13.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:07:46.07 +33:41:30.9: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:46.07 +33:41:30.9: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4090 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 03:53:14.84 +31:30:35.4: 13.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:50:54.46 +29:40:06.1: 13.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:54.46 +29:40:06.1: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.6026 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:18:36.67 +31:59:33.9: 13.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:49:42.92 +29:52:10.9: 13.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:36.67 +31:59:33.9: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3004 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:42.92 +29:52:10.9: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7645 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 03:53:14.84 +31:30:35.4: 13.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:14.84 +31:30:35.4: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8861 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_stack2.fits at 04:00:44.24 +33:22:17.2: 15.75 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_stack2.fits at 04:00:44.24 +33:22:17.2: 15.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.76 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:00:44.24 +33:22:17.2: ref_mag=15.76 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=12.6707 delta=3.09 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out144476.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28045.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144113_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144113_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:42.33 +33:35:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144115_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144115_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144117_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144117_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144118_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144118_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144119_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144119_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144125_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144125_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144126_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144126_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144128_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144128_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:16.55 +33:35:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144130_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144130_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144157_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144157_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144185_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144185_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144214_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144214_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:04.36 +25:32:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144222_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144222_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144234_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144234_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144239_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144239_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:49.11 +33:34:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144269_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144269_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:24.92 +27:22:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144284_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144284_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144287_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144287_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144293_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144293_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144321_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144321_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:48.31 +27:33:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144336_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144336_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:26.82 +35:06:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144352_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144352_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144370_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144370_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144381_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144381_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144396_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144396_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144411_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144411_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:33.12 +34:09:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144413_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144413_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144414_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144414_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144423_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144423_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:13.60 +31:51:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144424_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144424_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:36.04 +34:06:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144426_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144426_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144438_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144438_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144444_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144444_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:32.99 +33:50:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144446_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144446_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:24.92 +32:27:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144455_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144455_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144467_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144467_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144468_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144468_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144476_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 144476_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144479_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144479_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:35.58 +34:07:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144484_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144484_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:45.52 +34:21:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144488_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144488_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:23.30 +33:51:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144497_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144497_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:29.72 +33:27:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144502_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144502_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144504_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144504_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:22.93 +26:10:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144507_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144507_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144508_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144508_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144510_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144510_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144514_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144514_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144523_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144523_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144542_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144542_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144546_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144546_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144547_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144547_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144564_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144564_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:02.53 +29:01:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144573_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144573_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144577_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144577_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:11.57 +25:33:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144581_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144581_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:06.81 +33:36:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144586_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144586_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144600_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144600_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144601_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144601_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:12.49 +26:34:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144612_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144612_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144628_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144628_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:57.01 +34:56:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144647_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144647_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144659_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144659_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:05.98 +32:33:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102138_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 102138_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:01.04 +28:53:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109952_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 109952_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:28.18 +27:40:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50617_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 50617_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:10.25 +31:21:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64093_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 64093_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:52.55 +30:25:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08584_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 08584_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:03.82 +34:10:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32527_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32527_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:16.34 +33:02:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120848_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 120848_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:17.22 +28:04:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28045_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 28045_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67736_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 67736_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:50.21 +29:42:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118136_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 118136_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks