This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3756 2461248.8756 13.97 02:03:11.80 +28:12:39.0
141.60813 -32.04522 galactic Tri Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.686 Gersuind -0 -1 1 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:03:11.80 +28:12:39.0: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:03:11.80 +28:12:39.0: 16.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3756* 02 03 11.80 +28 12 39.0 14.0 U Tri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8756,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3756 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3756* 02 19 17.33 +28 57 13.9 14.2 U Tri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461248.8756,14.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260727.3756 14.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
First image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Last image: 2461248.87587091 27.07.2026 09:01:05.247 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12258
Objects passed selection criteria: 12227
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11245.2
Average stars matched: 9796.5 (87.1168 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239320 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 27 05:13:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
First image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Last image: 2461248.87587091 27.07.2026 09:01:05.247 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 77
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 72150
Objects passed selection criteria: 72003
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 61899.8
Average stars matched: 57396 (92.7241 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1977884 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 27 05:19:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461248.87527912
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits'
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits'
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits'
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:05.899 +30:01:04.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32
Second-epoch image center 02:00:05.899 +30:01:04.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0290 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:05.885 +30:00:25.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32
Second-epoch image center 02:00:05.885 +30:00:25.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0219 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:00:05.899 +30:01:04.35
Second-epoch second image center 02:00:05.885 +30:00:25.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01074 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WMY6dhWKes
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CfTgeyNudY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HBAud0XuCp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.roNuJBMGJ2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 12225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.6044 to 39.6615 deg, Dec +24.4131 to +35.2963 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.6044 to 39.6615 deg, Dec 24.4131 to 35.2963 deg
Loaded 8371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6352 out of 6782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6782 out of 12225 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.928900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.928900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 12225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.6044 to 39.6615 deg, Dec +24.4131 to +35.2963 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.6044 to 39.6615 deg, Dec 24.4131 to 35.2963 deg
Loaded 8371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6352 out of 6782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6782 out of 12225 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 17892 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.6045 to 39.7012 deg, Dec +24.3944 to +35.3109 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.6045 to 39.7012 deg, Dec 24.3944 to 35.3109 deg
Loaded 8419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6297 out of 6881 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6881 out of 17892 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
2.2 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
15.8 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WMY6dhWKes (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=932, bad_region=0, passed=12225
Got 12225 stars (including 11278 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12225 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=207 n_q2=302 n_q3=208 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CfTgeyNudY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1402, bad_region=0, passed=17892
Got 17892 stars (including 16468 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17892 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.233 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.201 n_q1=222 n_q2=293 n_q3=217 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HBAud0XuCp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=452, bad_region=0, passed=7536
Got 7536 stars (including 7075 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7536 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=955 robust_rms=11.163 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=955 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=955 robust_rms_before=0.979 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.372 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.376 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.372 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=219 n_q2=224 n_q3=293 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.roNuJBMGJ2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=449, bad_region=0, passed=7592
Got 7592 stars (including 7137 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7592 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=956 robust_rms=10.998 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=956 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=956 robust_rms_before=1.005 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.357 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.360 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.357 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=220 n_q2=224 n_q3=294 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.081
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits sigma_overall=0.347 worst_q_ratio=1.091
ref2=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.237 worst_q_ratio=1.181
new1=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits sigma_overall=0.384 worst_q_ratio=1.100
new2=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits sigma_overall=0.397 worst_q_ratio=1.081
reference average sigma_overall=0.292 worst_q_ratio=1.136
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.21 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24301_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 24301_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:56:47.01 +34:01:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21847_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 21847_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:07:50.92 +27:56:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00571_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 00571_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:01.81 +34:15:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:05.899 +30:01:04.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32
Second-epoch image center 02:00:05.899 +30:01:04.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0290 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:05.885 +30:00:25.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32
Second-epoch image center 02:00:05.885 +30:00:25.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0219 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:00:05.899 +30:01:04.35
Second-epoch second image center 02:00:05.885 +30:00:25.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01074 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XQsy6e6Tsn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EIRxIuU30g
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.grGXHYjtDL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HE9Ccypbqc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 73246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.5719 to 39.6906 deg, Dec +24.3227 to +35.3068 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.5719 to 39.6906 deg, Dec 24.3227 to 35.3068 deg
Loaded 8456 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5809 out of 6892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6892 out of 73246 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 73246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.5719 to 39.6906 deg, Dec +24.3227 to +35.3068 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.5719 to 39.6906 deg, Dec 24.3227 to 35.3068 deg
Loaded 8456 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5809 out of 6892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6892 out of 73246 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 88972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.5786 to 39.7012 deg, Dec +24.3308 to +35.3160 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.5786 to 39.7012 deg, Dec 24.3308 to 35.3160 deg
Loaded 8467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5449 out of 6890 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6890 out of 88972 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 76 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
2.1 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
16.0 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XQsy6e6Tsn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4778, bad_region=6, passed=73229
Got 73229 stars (including 68317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73229 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72658 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72658 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72658 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=214 n_q2=289 n_q3=215 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EIRxIuU30g (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=7665, bad_region=6, passed=88940
Got 88940 stars (including 81129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.234 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.234 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.205 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.207 n_q1=216 n_q2=285 n_q3=233 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.grGXHYjtDL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1700, bad_region=3, passed=43354
Got 43354 stars (including 41601 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43354 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42625 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=226 n_q2=219 n_q3=286 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HE9Ccypbqc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1698, bad_region=4, passed=43575
Got 43575 stars (including 41821 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43575 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=222 n_q2=216 n_q3=287 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-00-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040227_TTUQ1b1x1_2764926_6rFh8Fmh/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:36:46.46 +27:10:44.0: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:27:42.48 +30:59:26.0: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:18:29.25 +33:03:05.3: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:46:01.53 +29:18:58.4: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:42:41.92 +34:41:45.0: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:31:11.04 +28:09:57.3: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:27:42.48 +30:59:26.0: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:27:42.48 +30:59:26.0: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.5457 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:46:01.53 +29:18:58.4: 13.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:31:11.04 +28:09:57.3: 13.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:42:41.92 +34:41:45.0: 13.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:36:46.46 +27:10:44.0: 13.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:46:01.53 +29:18:58.4: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1927 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:18:29.25 +33:03:05.3: 14.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:31:11.04 +28:09:57.3: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8815 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:42:41.92 +34:41:45.0: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8083 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:36:46.46 +27:10:44.0: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8090 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:18:29.25 +33:03:05.3: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2560 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:31:47.13 +34:52:55.6: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:31:47.13 +34:52:55.6: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:31:47.13 +34:52:55.6: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3157 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:37:33.67 +30:33:07.8: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:36:52.05 +29:25:15.5: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:37:33.67 +30:33:07.8: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:37:33.67 +30:33:07.8: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4768 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:41:50.60 +30:03:23.7: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:41:51.53 +30:03:53.7: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:58:48.18 +32:51:27.1: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:36:52.05 +29:25:15.5: 12.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:48:27.42 +31:33:06.8: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:36:52.05 +29:25:15.5: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1430 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:13:26.30 +34:38:20.9: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:27:16.74 +33:34:43.8: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:41:50.60 +30:03:23.7: 13.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:41:50.60 +30:03:23.7: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3808 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:41:51.53 +30:03:53.7: 13.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:48:27.42 +31:33:06.8: 13.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:58:48.18 +32:51:27.1: 13.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:41:51.53 +30:03:53.7: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4791 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:48:27.42 +31:33:06.8: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.4541 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:58:48.18 +32:51:27.1: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4385 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:13:26.30 +34:38:20.9: 13.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:13:26.30 +34:38:20.9: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4784 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:27:16.74 +33:34:43.8: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:27:16.74 +33:34:43.8: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4882 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:39:46.29 +30:05:06.3: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:59:36.04 +27:39:27.9: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:23:51.56 +33:29:16.5: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:39:46.29 +30:05:06.3: 13.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:59:36.04 +27:39:27.9: 13.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:59:36.04 +27:39:27.9: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5475 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:39:46.29 +30:05:06.3: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6548 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:23:51.56 +33:29:16.5: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:59:16.78 +34:32:16.9: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:42:02.90 +29:58:22.2: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:23:51.56 +33:29:16.5: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6605 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:25:24.10 +31:10:32.9: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:51:42.07 +33:45:28.3: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:59:16.78 +34:32:16.9: 13.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:59:16.78 +34:32:16.9: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7985 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:42:02.90 +29:58:22.2: 13.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:42:02.90 +29:58:22.2: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8453 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:51:42.07 +33:45:28.3: 13.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:49:52.50 +27:13:33.8: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:51:42.07 +33:45:28.3: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7898 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:25:24.10 +31:10:32.9: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:25:24.10 +31:10:32.9: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8826 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:10:20.58 +25:24:48.0: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:37:17.34 +27:41:10.7: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:49:52.50 +27:13:33.8: 13.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:49:52.50 +27:13:33.8: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8602 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:10:20.58 +25:24:48.0: 13.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:10:20.58 +25:24:48.0: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7948 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:06:23.06 +26:01:32.3: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:35:55.26 +30:44:37.4: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:37:17.34 +27:41:10.7: 13.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:37:17.34 +27:41:10.7: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8364 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:45:30.15 +27:07:49.0: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:06:23.06 +26:01:32.3: 13.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:06:23.06 +26:01:32.3: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8133 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:35:55.26 +30:44:37.4: 13.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 02:03:11.80 +28:12:39.0: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:35:55.26 +30:44:37.4: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8338 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:45:30.15 +27:07:49.0: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:45:30.15 +27:07:49.0: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8996 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:56:01.58 +29:51:26.0: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_stack1.fits at 01:55:01.00 +27:33:27.2: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 02:03:11.80 +28:12:39.0: 16.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:56:01.58 +29:51:26.0: 14.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:56:01.58 +29:51:26.0: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1605 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_stack2.fits at 01:55:01.00 +27:33:27.2: 13.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:55:01.00 +27:33:27.2: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0592 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out100936.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 23s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100328_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100328_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100331_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100331_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100336_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100336_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:08.51 +30:14:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100339_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100339_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100340_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100340_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:51:41.74 +30:19:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100341_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100341_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100344_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100344_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100345_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100345_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100347_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100347_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:09:22.67 +28:22:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100348_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100348_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:27:14.17 +28:59:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100349_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100349_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:12:24.03 +33:35:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100351_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100351_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100412_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100412_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:09:29.37 +25:57:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100519_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100519_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:29:18.74 +25:15:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100521_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100521_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100536_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100536_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:17:29.73 +33:50:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100554_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100554_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:06:55.95 +25:41:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100616_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100616_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:01.74 +33:53:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100620_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100620_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:38.20 +33:19:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100641_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100641_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100647_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100647_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:50:38.82 +27:55:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100659_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100659_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:08.53 +30:20:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100664_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100664_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:53:14.67 +29:35:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100695_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100695_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:31:50.03 +28:50:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100698_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100698_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100699_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100699_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100724_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100724_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100729_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100729_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100746_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100746_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:19.59 +32:43:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100747_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100747_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100768_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100768_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100770_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100770_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:55:04.28 +27:16:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100771_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100771_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:20:15.15 +29:48:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100780_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100780_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:57.70 +34:55:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100787_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100787_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:36.64 +31:31:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100792_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100792_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100795_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100795_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:15:47.40 +33:20:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100796_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100796_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:14:02.68 +34:38:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100798_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100798_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100805_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100805_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:15.61 +30:34:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100807_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100807_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100809_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100809_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:09:18.47 +33:55:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100811_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100811_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:50:34.40 +27:57:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100813_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100813_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:24:56.09 +28:50:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100814_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100814_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:19.86 +32:40:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100815_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100815_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:01:10.74 +25:11:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100821_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100821_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:03:34.26 +25:10:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100834_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100834_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100845_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100845_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:39:26.25 +27:11:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100850_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100850_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100852_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100852_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100853_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100853_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100860_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100860_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:11:10.59 +25:57:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100864_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100864_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:58:08.38 +31:05:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100871_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100871_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100879_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100879_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:18.70 +29:40:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100880_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100880_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100882_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100882_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100886_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100886_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:44:09.83 +30:29:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100891_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100891_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100901_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100901_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100906_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100906_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:45:38.77 +34:16:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100923_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100923_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:49:19.38 +32:26:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100925_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100925_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100935_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100935_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:02:23.71 +29:44:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100936_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 100936_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100995_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100995_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:58:39.23 +33:33:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100996_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 100996_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101004_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 101004_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:36:37.00 +32:00:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101013_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 101013_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101035_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 101035_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101070_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 101070_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:54:41.68 +31:50:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68673_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 68673_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:07:50.86 +27:56:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10047_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 10047_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:56:47.01 +34:01:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31081_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 31081_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:45:35.02 +31:22:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02802_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 02802_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_04-01-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks