This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3192 2461248.8192 10.97 20:44:37.98 -13:17:03.0
33.32517 -31.02439 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.287 Nephthys 0 0 0 11.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:44:37.98 -13:17:03.0: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:44:37.98 -13:17:03.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8192,10.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3192 10.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3192 2461248.8192 12.84 20:27:19.80 -10:25:47.8
34.27637 -25.98789 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1058 Grubba -3 1 3 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:27:19.80 -10:25:47.8: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:27:19.80 -10:25:47.8: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3192* 20 27 19.80 -10 25 47.8 12.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8192,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3192 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3192 2461248.8192 13.85 20:27:45.96 -07:49:59.9
36.91822 -24.95538 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.872 Holda -1 2 2 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:27:45.96 -07:49:59.9: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:27:45.96 -07:49:59.9: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8192,13.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3192 13.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3192 2461248.8192 13.12 20:18:43.20 -07:08:57.7
36.49809 -22.64293 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J201843-0709.0
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.005 V 14.094 V 2452027.76000 0.519495800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:18:43.20 -07:08:57.7: 14.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:18:43.20 -07:08:57.7: 13.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J201843-0709.0,2461248.8192,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J201843-0709.0 20260727.3192 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3192 2461248.8192 12.87 20:38:50.57 -09:45:55.5
36.31763 -28.26190 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" OY Aqr
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.480 V Y 0.904 V 2453554.18320 0.598631400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:38:50.57 -09:45:55.5: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:38:50.57 -09:45:55.5: 13.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
OY Aqr,2461248.8192,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
OY Aqr 20260727.3192 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461212.87205516 21.06.2026 08:55:35.566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
First image: 2461212.87205516 21.06.2026 08:55:35.566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Last image: 2461248.81948946 27.07.2026 07:39:53.889 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 82 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18257
Objects passed selection criteria: 18169
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11416.8
Average stars matched: 10928.8 (95.7256 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 243628 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 27 03:28:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461212.87205516 21.06.2026 08:55:35.566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
First image: 2461212.87205516 21.06.2026 08:55:35.566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Last image: 2461248.81948946 27.07.2026 07:39:53.889 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 83
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.88
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 63 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 108252
Objects passed selection criteria: 107963
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 74250
Average stars matched: 69705.8 (93.8798 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2051384 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 27 03:36:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461248.81896007
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits'
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.836 -09:59:48.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49
Second-epoch image center 20:34:16.836 -09:59:48.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:19.570 -10:00:03.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49
Second-epoch image center 20:34:19.570 -10:00:03.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0149 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:16.836 -09:59:48.91
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:19.570 -10:00:03.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01193 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4OXM4iRcXS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bnvJ5b9iZW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q0QRbxbPUR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CJY91m1Eqz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23162 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5232 to 316.6601 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5232 to 316.6601 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Loaded 9286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7715 out of 8299 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8299 out of 23162 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.654300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.654300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23162 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5232 to 316.6601 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5232 to 316.6601 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Loaded 9286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7715 out of 8299 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8299 out of 23162 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 22246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5233 to 316.6599 deg, Dec -15.2795 to -4.7122 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5233 to 316.6599 deg, Dec -15.2795 to -4.7122 deg
Loaded 9286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7768 out of 8290 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8290 out of 22246 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
15.5 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4OXM4iRcXS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1608, bad_region=4433, passed=23162
Got 23162 stars (including 17353 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23162 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19021 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19021 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19021 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=284 n_q2=162 n_q3=324 n_q4=181 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.018
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bnvJ5b9iZW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1468, bad_region=4273, passed=22246
Got 22246 stars (including 16703 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22246 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=282 n_q2=159 n_q3=318 n_q4=192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.q0QRbxbPUR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=436, bad_region=1405, passed=6028
Got 6028 stars (including 4266 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6028 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=943 robust_rms=6.595 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=943 robust_rms=0.406 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=943 robust_rms_before=0.741 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.427 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.406 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.427 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.485 n_q1=287 n_q2=216 n_q3=255 n_q4=185 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CJY91m1Eqz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=440, bad_region=1414, passed=5999
Got 5999 stars (including 4226 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5999 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=945 robust_rms=6.650 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=945 robust_rms=0.383 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=945 robust_rms_before=0.713 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.412 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.383 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.412 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.476 n_q1=293 n_q2=218 n_q3=247 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.018
ref2=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.062
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits sigma_overall=0.418 worst_q_ratio=1.161
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=0.424 worst_q_ratio=1.151
reference average sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.04
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3_astrometric_residuals.png (951 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3_astrometric_residuals.png (951 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171_astrometric_residuals.png (945 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:44:37.98 -13:17:03.0: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:44:37.98 -13:17:03.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31468.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31468_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 31468_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07269_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 07269_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:58.14 -11:49:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:44:37.98 -13:17:03.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.836 -09:59:48.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49
Second-epoch image center 20:34:16.836 -09:59:48.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:19.570 -10:00:03.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49
Second-epoch image center 20:34:19.570 -10:00:03.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0149 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:16.836 -09:59:48.91
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:19.570 -10:00:03.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01193 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8lXmKzGJ0B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a94IcN4564
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Jcs8LAfmWb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.res4kMK0v8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5071 to 316.6699 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6940 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5071 to 316.6699 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6940 deg
Loaded 9320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6423 out of 8312 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8312 out of 129460 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.553300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.553300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.88
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5071 to 316.6699 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6940 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5071 to 316.6699 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6940 deg
Loaded 9320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6423 out of 8312 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8312 out of 129460 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits (aperture=5.2)
Read 128708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5087 to 316.6713 deg, Dec -15.2795 to -4.6942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5087 to 316.6713 deg, Dec -15.2795 to -4.6942 deg
Loaded 9318 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6421 out of 8305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8305 out of 128708 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 66 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
2.4 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
15.7 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8lXmKzGJ0B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=14001, bad_region=18479, passed=129432
Got 129432 stars (including 98219 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129432 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 112559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 112558 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 112558 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=298 n_q2=167 n_q3=303 n_q4=188 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.a94IcN4564 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=13778, bad_region=18495, passed=128681
Got 128681 stars (including 97645 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128681 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 112129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 112129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 112129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=297 n_q2=173 n_q3=293 n_q4=192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Jcs8LAfmWb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2271, bad_region=7780, passed=46657
Got 46657 stars (including 37368 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46657 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39331 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39331 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.537 n_q1=298 n_q2=211 n_q3=266 n_q4=172 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.res4kMK0v8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2232, bad_region=7716, passed=46484
Got 46484 stars (including 37238 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46484 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.532 n_q1=300 n_q2=211 n_q3=260 n_q4=175 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_031642_TTUQ2b1x1_53504_aexofJeg/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:20:50.77 -06:29:34.7: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:30:19.77 -09:55:07.2: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:40:18.87 -07:09:20.4: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:46:52.01 -11:52:14.3: 13.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:25:58.52 -05:59:57.8: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:27:59.18 -11:32:05.2: 13.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:49:31.30 -09:35:30.4: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:24:37.34 -08:45:32.6: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:40:42.58 -11:08:27.7: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:20:50.77 -06:29:34.7: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:50.77 -06:29:34.7: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3350 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:50:10.90 -08:10:28.4: 13.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:30:19.77 -09:55:07.2: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:40:18.87 -07:09:20.4: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:19.77 -09:55:07.2: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2965 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:18.87 -07:09:20.4: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6811 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:27:59.18 -11:32:05.2: 13.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:59.18 -11:32:05.2: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8016 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:49:31.30 -09:35:30.4: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:31.30 -09:35:30.4: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.4259 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:46:52.01 -11:52:14.3: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:52.01 -11:52:14.3: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8340 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:25:58.52 -05:59:57.8: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:58.52 -05:59:57.8: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5950 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:40:42.58 -11:08:27.7: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:42.58 -11:08:27.7: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7396 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:24:37.34 -08:45:32.6: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:50:10.90 -08:10:28.4: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:10.90 -08:10:28.4: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4369 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:37.34 -08:45:32.6: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3609 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:50:25.64 -12:42:20.1: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:24:32.65 -07:43:23.7: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:49:28.39 -11:40:45.0: 12.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:38:34.87 -13:12:56.4: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:17:00.77 -12:35:14.3: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:50:25.64 -12:42:20.1: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:24:32.65 -07:43:23.7: 12.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:25.64 -12:42:20.1: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2711 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:35:44.46 -13:55:25.1: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:32.65 -07:43:23.7: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8889 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:43:00.13 -10:50:57.7: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:38:52.26 -13:23:17.0: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:36:57.14 -09:48:54.8: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:44:30.35 -08:15:53.9: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:38:34.87 -13:12:56.4: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:49:28.39 -11:40:45.0: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:34.87 -13:12:56.4: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8408 delta=-0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:28.39 -11:40:45.0: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0474 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:17:00.77 -12:35:14.3: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:00.77 -12:35:14.3: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7723 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:43:00.13 -10:50:57.7: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:00.13 -10:50:57.7: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.2094 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:35:44.46 -13:55:25.1: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:44.46 -13:55:25.1: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7486 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:36:57.14 -09:48:54.8: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:44:30.35 -08:15:53.9: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:57.14 -09:48:54.8: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5841 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:38:52.26 -13:23:17.0: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:30.35 -08:15:53.9: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7918 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:52.26 -13:23:17.0: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0864 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:26:21.01 -06:08:26.7: 11.36 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:26:21.01 -06:08:26.7: 11.33 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:25:53.94 -06:56:35.7: 12.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.35 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:21.01 -06:08:26.7: ref_mag=11.35 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4262 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:20:56.23 -10:57:41.3: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:27:19.80 -10:25:47.8: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:20:05.86 -06:51:09.7: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:28:21.27 -13:08:20.2: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:25:53.94 -06:56:35.7: 12.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:53.94 -06:56:35.7: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8051 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:46:19.47 -13:09:35.9: 12.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:45:55.53 -08:26:32.1: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:20:56.23 -10:57:41.3: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:56.23 -10:57:41.3: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7400 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:20:05.86 -06:51:09.7: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:27:19.80 -10:25:47.8: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:05.86 -06:51:09.7: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9078 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:28:21.27 -13:08:20.2: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:21.27 -13:08:20.2: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9848 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:35:18.76 -13:34:36.6: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:45:55.53 -08:26:32.1: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:46:19.47 -13:09:35.9: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:19.47 -13:09:35.9: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9864 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:55.53 -08:26:32.1: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0020 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:34:29.02 -05:50:58.7: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:35:18.76 -13:34:36.6: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:18.76 -13:34:36.6: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1486 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:34:29.02 -05:50:58.7: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:29.02 -05:50:58.7: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3721 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:35:28.10 -12:56:34.5: 13.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:17:59.01 -10:36:16.3: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:33:14.10 -10:08:22.9: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:31:12.45 -06:22:57.7: 13.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:34:50.72 -07:13:52.1: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:41:39.83 -12:20:29.8: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:17:59.01 -10:36:16.3: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:35:28.10 -12:56:34.5: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:59.01 -10:36:16.3: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3563 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:28.10 -12:56:34.5: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2448 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:50:11.84 -14:06:52.1: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:34:50.72 -07:13:52.1: 13.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:50.72 -07:13:52.1: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4804 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:31:12.45 -06:22:57.7: 13.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:33:14.10 -10:08:22.9: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:12.45 -06:22:57.7: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3659 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:18:03.45 -06:36:12.6: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:14.10 -10:08:22.9: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3963 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:41:39.83 -12:20:29.8: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:39.83 -12:20:29.8: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5417 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:50:11.84 -14:06:52.1: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:11.84 -14:06:52.1: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5679 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:49:12.54 -08:47:49.3: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:18:03.45 -06:36:12.6: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:03.45 -06:36:12.6: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6076 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:41:44.58 -12:19:16.4: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:49:12.54 -08:47:49.3: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:12.54 -08:47:49.3: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6511 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:41:44.45 -06:29:02.7: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:34:39.61 -11:51:48.1: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:44:57.94 -11:00:48.1: 13.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:48:39.92 -05:55:59.0: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:40:00.30 -05:59:06.6: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:41:44.58 -12:19:16.4: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:34:39.61 -11:51:48.1: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:44.58 -12:19:16.4: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6846 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:37:28.65 -06:46:19.0: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:39.61 -11:51:48.1: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7963 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:48:39.92 -05:55:59.0: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:41:44.45 -06:29:02.7: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:39.92 -05:55:59.0: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4692 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:44.45 -06:29:02.7: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4879 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:44:57.94 -11:00:48.1: 13.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:33:10.99 -10:41:31.5: 13.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:40:00.30 -05:59:06.6: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:57.94 -11:00:48.1: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8168 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:00.30 -05:59:06.6: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5992 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:44:12.69 -09:02:03.5: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:37:28.65 -06:46:19.0: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:28.65 -06:46:19.0: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6992 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:33:10.99 -10:41:31.5: 14.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:10.99 -10:41:31.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9201 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:44:12.69 -09:02:03.5: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:12.69 -09:02:03.5: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9089 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:27:45.96 -07:49:59.9: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:38:49.98 -09:36:31.3: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:32:44.99 -08:54:52.2: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:24:15.63 -09:59:20.7: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:27:45.96 -07:49:59.9: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:38:49.98 -09:36:31.3: 13.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:32:44.99 -08:54:52.2: 13.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:49.98 -09:36:31.3: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7534 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:44.99 -08:54:52.2: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0540 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:18:43.20 -07:08:57.7: 14.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:24:15.63 -09:59:20.7: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:15.63 -09:59:20.7: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8824 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:38:50.57 -09:45:55.5: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:42:29.71 -08:38:25.0: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:18:43.20 -07:08:57.7: 13.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:18:43.20 -07:08:57.7: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1142 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:38:50.57 -09:45:55.5: 13.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:38:50.57 -09:45:55.5: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8673 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:42:29.71 -08:38:25.0: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:29.71 -08:38:25.0: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6077 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out116764.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out152281.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out156525.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out61359.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148469_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148469_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148472_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148472_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148474_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148474_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148476_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148476_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148484_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148484_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148486_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148486_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148490_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148490_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148493_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148493_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148494_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148494_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148495_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148495_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:46.89 -05:48:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148497_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148497_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148502_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148502_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148507_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148507_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148508_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148508_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148510_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148510_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148512_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148512_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148514_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148514_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148515_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148515_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148517_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148517_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148518_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148518_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148519_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148519_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148522_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148522_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148661_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148661_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:36.74 -12:31:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149276_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 149276_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:37.96 -13:17:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151026_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 151026_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:03.62 -12:35:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151566_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 151566_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:19.59 -09:52:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152017_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 152017_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152018_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 152018_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152276_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 152276_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:47.44 -09:28:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152281_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 152281_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152688_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 152688_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152846_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 152846_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152861_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 152861_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152923_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 152923_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152988_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 152988_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:06.03 -12:35:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153039_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 153039_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153644_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 153644_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153680_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 153680_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:25:45.28 -12:37:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154062_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 154062_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154310_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 154310_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154334_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 154334_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154386_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 154386_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154668_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 154668_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154896_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 154896_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154906_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 154906_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154915_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 154915_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154941_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 154941_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155083_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 155083_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155237_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 155237_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155463_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 155463_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155641_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 155641_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155651_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 155651_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155658_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 155658_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155666_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 155666_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156314_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 156314_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156430_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 156430_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156525_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 156525_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156547_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 156547_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156606_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 156606_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156750_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 156750_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23696_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 23696_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:53.21 -12:49:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116764_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 116764_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34610_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 34610_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:58.14 -11:49:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61359_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 61359_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76275_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 76275_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13418_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 13418_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-27_02-39-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks