This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.2889 2461248.7889 9.26 20:08:28.06 -05:01:48.9
37.29642 -19.41334 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3 Juno 0 -0 0 9.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:08:28.06 -05:01:48.9: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:08:28.06 -05:01:48.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.7889,9.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.2889 9.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.2889 2461248.7889 11.03 20:44:39.62 -13:16:48.1
33.33273 -31.02879 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.287 Nephthys -1 -0 1 11.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:44:39.62 -13:16:48.1: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:44:39.62 -13:16:48.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.7889,11.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.2889 11.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.2889 2461248.7889 12.74 21:00:01.11 -06:31:44.0
42.37056 -31.48723 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.490 Veritas -1 -1 2 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 21:00:01.11 -06:31:44.0: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 21:00:01.11 -06:31:44.0: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.7889,12.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.2889 12.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.2889 2461248.7889 12.86 20:27:21.49 -10:25:45.5
34.28030 -25.99388 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1058 Grubba -2 -1 3 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:27:21.49 -10:25:45.5: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:27:21.49 -10:25:45.5: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.2889* 20 27 21.49 -10 25 45.5 12.9 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.7889,12.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.2889 12.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.2889 2461248.7889 13.22 20:39:48.89 -05:33:38.3
40.67398 -26.59152 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.2" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J309.9509-05.5603 | 20:39:48.89 -05:33:38.3 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.494+/-0.035 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:39:48.89 -05:33:38.3: 14.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:39:48.89 -05:33:38.3: 14.23 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J309.9509-05.5603,2461248.7889,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J309.9509-05.5603 20260727.2889 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461212.87205516 21.06.2026 08:55:35.566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
First image: 2461212.87205516 21.06.2026 08:55:35.566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Last image: 2461248.78921516 27.07.2026 06:56:18.190 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 21500
Objects passed selection criteria: 21412
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14493.5
Average stars matched: 14218.8 (98.1043 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246076 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 27 03:47:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461212.87205516 21.06.2026 08:55:35.566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
First image: 2461212.87205516 21.06.2026 08:55:35.566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Last image: 2461248.78921516 27.07.2026 06:56:18.190 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 57
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.92
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 42 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 118634
Objects passed selection criteria: 118355
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 82868
Average stars matched: 79891.8 (96.4084 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2061380 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 27 03:54:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461248.78867906
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits'
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:14.534 -10:00:57.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49
Second-epoch image center 20:34:14.534 -10:00:57.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0128 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:11.764 -10:00:55.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49
Second-epoch image center 20:34:11.764 -10:00:55.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0240 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:14.534 -10:00:57.91
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:11.764 -10:00:55.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01138 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1AsCTBendC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QGy5tQ0PPm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x1SjPf2HiQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nEY1dMQdy4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23162 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5232 to 316.6601 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5232 to 316.6601 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Loaded 9286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7715 out of 8299 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8299 out of 23162 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.654300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.654300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23162 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5232 to 316.6601 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5232 to 316.6601 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Loaded 9286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7715 out of 8299 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8299 out of 23162 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 22246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5233 to 316.6599 deg, Dec -15.2795 to -4.7122 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5233 to 316.6599 deg, Dec -15.2795 to -4.7122 deg
Loaded 9286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7768 out of 8290 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8290 out of 22246 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
3.7 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
3.7 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
15.5 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1AsCTBendC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1608, bad_region=0, passed=23162
Got 23162 stars (including 21534 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23162 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.459 n_q1=220 n_q2=229 n_q3=261 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.460
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QGy5tQ0PPm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1468, bad_region=0, passed=22246
Got 22246 stars (including 20755 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22246 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=218 n_q2=223 n_q3=255 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.482
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.x1SjPf2HiQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=327, bad_region=0, passed=6476
Got 6476 stars (including 6142 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=943 robust_rms=7.853 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=943 robust_rms=0.347 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=943 robust_rms_before=0.807 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.372 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.347 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.372 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=218 n_q2=192 n_q3=287 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nEY1dMQdy4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=335, bad_region=0, passed=6451
Got 6451 stars (including 6111 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6451 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6327 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=944 robust_rms=8.051 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=944 robust_rms=0.379 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=944 robust_rms_before=0.839 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.373 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.379 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.373 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=219 n_q2=196 n_q3=284 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.356
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits sigma_overall=0.374 worst_q_ratio=1.460
ref2=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.482
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.319
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.356
reference average sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.471
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3_astrometric_residuals.png (952 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3_astrometric_residuals.png (949 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:44:39.62 -13:16:48.1: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:08:28.06 -05:01:48.9: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:44:39.62 -13:16:48.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:08:28.06 -05:01:48.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30860.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31004.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30860_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 30860_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30938_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 30938_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.56 -06:36:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31004_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 31004_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07269_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 07269_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:58.09 -11:49:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:08:28.06 -05:01:48.9
20:44:39.62 -13:16:48.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:14.534 -10:00:57.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49
Second-epoch image center 20:34:14.534 -10:00:57.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0128 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:11.764 -10:00:55.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49
Second-epoch image center 20:34:11.764 -10:00:55.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0240 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:14.534 -10:00:57.91
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:11.764 -10:00:55.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01138 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MSXhWNozfU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rG8sOsPALJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pTAbrLWhnB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p7ehVG8z6y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5071 to 316.6699 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6940 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5071 to 316.6699 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6940 deg
Loaded 9320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6423 out of 8312 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8312 out of 129460 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.564700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.564700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.92
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5071 to 316.6699 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6940 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5071 to 316.6699 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6940 deg
Loaded 9320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6423 out of 8312 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8312 out of 129460 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits (aperture=5.3)
Read 128708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5087 to 316.6713 deg, Dec -15.2795 to -4.6942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5087 to 316.6713 deg, Dec -15.2795 to -4.6942 deg
Loaded 9318 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6421 out of 8305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8305 out of 128708 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits (aperture=5.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 54 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
2.4 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
15.6 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MSXhWNozfU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=14001, bad_region=0, passed=129422
Got 129422 stars (including 115274 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129422 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=230 n_q2=239 n_q3=235 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.375
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rG8sOsPALJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=34, blended=13778, bad_region=0, passed=128674
Got 128674 stars (including 114751 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128674 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 127529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 127529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 127529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=224 n_q2=245 n_q3=227 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pTAbrLWhnB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1629, bad_region=1, passed=37887
Got 37887 stars (including 36221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37887 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37322 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=199 n_q2=185 n_q3=296 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.435
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.p7ehVG8z6y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1646, bad_region=1, passed=37711
Got 37711 stars (including 36029 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37711 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=198 n_q2=188 n_q3=297 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.408
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-55-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_015651_TTUQ1b1x1_3830256_auAmVGqC/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:17:58.82 -06:09:00.2: 11.06 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 21:05:33.58 -06:34:36.1: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 21:04:07.59 -09:24:54.9: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 21:04:16.27 -06:21:04.5: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 21:05:11.26 -09:30:25.3: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:43:00.08 -10:50:58.3: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:39:38.11 -05:23:23.9: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:15:40.85 -11:43:48.6: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:26:20.93 -06:08:27.1: 11.36 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 21:05:33.58 -06:34:36.1: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:39:38.11 -05:23:23.9: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 21:04:07.59 -09:24:54.9: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 21:04:16.27 -06:21:04.5: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:43:00.08 -10:50:58.3: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:17:58.82 -06:09:00.2: 11.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:33.58 -06:34:36.1: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0837 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:38.11 -05:23:23.9: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1765 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.06 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:26:20.93 -06:08:27.1: 11.33 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:16.27 -06:21:04.5: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5297 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:07.59 -09:24:54.9: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3001 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:15:40.85 -11:43:48.6: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:00.08 -10:50:58.3: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.2020 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 21:05:11.26 -09:30:25.3: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:58.82 -06:09:00.2: ref_mag=11.06 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2979 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.35 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:20.93 -06:08:27.1: ref_mag=11.35 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3770 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:40.85 -11:43:48.6: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8448 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:11.26 -09:30:25.3: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2684 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:23:33.13 -04:46:33.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:23:33.13 -04:46:33.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:33.13 -04:46:33.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:52:37.89 -08:56:47.8: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:22:59.56 -04:46:18.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:27:53.54 -05:39:36.0: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:12:44.94 -07:33:49.5: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:31:51.27 -05:35:39.8: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:20:05.76 -06:51:11.6: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:14:51.67 -10:54:45.1: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:22:59.56 -04:46:18.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:59.56 -04:46:18.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:52:37.89 -08:56:47.8: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:27:53.54 -05:39:36.0: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:12:44.94 -07:33:49.5: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:37.89 -08:56:47.8: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0933 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:53.54 -05:39:36.0: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5770 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:44.94 -07:33:49.5: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5431 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 21:00:01.11 -06:31:44.0: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:53:43.77 -07:47:40.8: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:07:10.21 -07:18:31.9: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:31:51.27 -05:35:39.8: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:20:05.76 -06:51:11.6: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:14:51.67 -10:54:45.1: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:51.27 -05:35:39.8: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8147 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:05.76 -06:51:11.6: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7731 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:51.67 -10:54:45.1: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5997 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 21:00:01.11 -06:31:44.0: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:07:10.21 -07:18:31.9: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:53:43.77 -07:47:40.8: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:10.21 -07:18:31.9: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8108 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:43.77 -07:47:40.8: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8356 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:14:48.49 -10:54:55.2: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:10:04.89 -08:08:01.6: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:20:56.28 -10:57:42.9: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:23:45.15 -05:15:29.9: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:27:21.49 -10:25:45.5: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:14:48.49 -10:54:55.2: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:10:04.89 -08:08:01.6: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:48.49 -10:54:55.2: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7364 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:20:56.28 -10:57:42.9: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:04.89 -08:08:01.6: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8691 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:56.28 -10:57:42.9: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7820 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:25:12.09 -06:58:40.1: 13.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:30:32.80 -05:24:49.4: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:15:20.39 -05:31:11.6: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:23:45.15 -05:15:29.9: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:27:21.49 -10:25:45.5: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:45.15 -05:15:29.9: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9238 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:34:45.02 -06:15:57.8: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:25:12.09 -06:58:40.1: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:15:20.39 -05:31:11.6: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:30:32.80 -05:24:49.4: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:12.09 -06:58:40.1: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2585 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:20.39 -05:31:11.6: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3272 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:32.80 -05:24:49.4: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1960 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:34:29.08 -05:50:59.5: 13.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:27:46.07 -05:41:36.6: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:41:44.30 -06:29:03.4: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:34:45.02 -06:15:57.8: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:45.02 -06:15:57.8: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2515 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:34:29.08 -05:50:59.5: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:27:46.07 -05:41:36.6: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:29.08 -05:50:59.5: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2993 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:41:44.30 -06:29:03.4: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:46.07 -05:41:36.6: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3403 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:44.30 -06:29:03.4: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5007 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:39:48.89 -05:33:38.3: 14.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:39:48.89 -05:33:38.3: 14.23 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:39:48.89 -05:33:38.3: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2144 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out150586.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out150682.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82621.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149882_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 149882_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149885_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 149885_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149893_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 149893_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149896_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 149896_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149899_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 149899_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149901_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 149901_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:25.17 -10:42:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149905_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 149905_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149907_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 149907_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149909_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 149909_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149910_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 149910_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149927_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 149927_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:28.06 -05:01:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149936_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 149936_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149990_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 149990_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:02:13.29 -13:02:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150066_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150066_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:41.58 -06:21:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150078_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150078_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:39.63 -13:16:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150317_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150317_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150379_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150379_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150418_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150418_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:03.68 -12:35:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150442_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150442_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150445_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150445_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150451_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150451_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:12.01 -14:47:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150469_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150469_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:53:54.09 -06:54:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150498_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150498_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:19.63 -09:52:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150515_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150515_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150541_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150541_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150543_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150543_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150548_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150548_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150575_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150575_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150586_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 150586_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150588_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150588_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:20.25 -12:37:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150609_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150609_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150611_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150611_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150621_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150621_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150638_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150638_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150656_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150656_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:25.03 -05:39:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150682_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 150682_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150689_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150689_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:39.37 -07:01:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150763_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150763_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:47.42 -09:28:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150810_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150810_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150838_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150838_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150861_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150861_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150869_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150869_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150871_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150871_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150933_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 150933_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151063_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 151063_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23696_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 23696_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:53.16 -12:49:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03884_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 03884_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:08.34 -14:46:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82621_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 82621_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18119_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 18119_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:16.65 -13:15:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17666_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 17666_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:03.27 -13:18:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13418_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 13418_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:26:13.25 -13:47:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34610_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 34610_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:58.09 -11:49:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111247_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 111247_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:29.19 -06:37:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89119_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 89119_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_01-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
