This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4536 2461247.9536 11.82 05:59:29.12 +33:32:25.4
177.53297 4.88883 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia 0 1 1 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:59:29.12 +33:32:25.4: 16.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:59:29.12 +33:32:25.4: 16.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9536,11.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4536 11.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.4536 2461247.9536 12.62 05:51:57.80 +31:22:17.0
178.61835 2.42944 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina 1 1 2 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:51:57.80 +31:22:17.0: 16.35 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:51:57.80 +31:22:17.0: 16.20 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.26 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.9536,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.4536 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Last image: 2461247.95388172 26.07.2026 10:53:25.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.91
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 52 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 45112
Objects passed selection criteria: 44857
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24982
Average stars matched: 23975.2 (95.9701 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 269784 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 07:13:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Last image: 2461247.95388172 26.07.2026 10:53:25.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 90
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 1242 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 226703
Objects passed selection criteria: 225859
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 134075
Average stars matched: 127196 (94.8695 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2172580 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 07:51:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461247.95332208
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits'
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:52.156 +30:00:40.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 05:59:52.156 +30:00:40.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0329 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:50.446 +30:00:09.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 05:59:50.446 +30:00:09.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0365 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:52.156 +30:00:40.44
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:50.446 +30:00:09.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01050 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oCpysDLBDF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4XnvPVB0d5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mW6zURdOZr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t7v2nFdhPe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 59032 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5696 to 99.6817 deg, Dec +24.3390 to +35.3067 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5696 to 99.6817 deg, Dec 24.3390 to 35.3067 deg
Loaded 17127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11106 out of 14210 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14210 out of 59032 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.914400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.914400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.91
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.00
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 59032 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5696 to 99.6817 deg, Dec +24.3390 to +35.3067 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5696 to 99.6817 deg, Dec 24.3390 to 35.3067 deg
Loaded 17127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11106 out of 14210 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14210 out of 59032 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 59198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec +24.3394 to +35.3126 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec 24.3394 to 35.3126 deg
Loaded 17144 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11087 out of 14183 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14183 out of 59198 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
2.4 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
16.0 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
16.0 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
12.4 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.4 (SNR ) 9.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.oCpysDLBDF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=9801, bad_region=11245, passed=59032
Got 59032 stars (including 39689 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59032 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits N_match=929 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=274 n_q2=183 n_q3=288 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4XnvPVB0d5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=9838, bad_region=11294, passed=59198
Got 59198 stars (including 39784 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59198 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=279 n_q2=181 n_q3=280 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mW6zURdOZr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=297, bad_region=502, passed=3011
Got 3011 stars (including 2243 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3011 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=924 robust_rms=5.921 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=924 robust_rms=0.607 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=924 robust_rms_before=0.923 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.524 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.607 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.524 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.510 n_q1=286 n_q2=141 n_q3=355 n_q4=142 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.t7v2nFdhPe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=297, bad_region=486, passed=2850
Got 2850 stars (including 2099 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2850 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=924 robust_rms=5.927 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=924 robust_rms=0.576 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=924 robust_rms_before=0.899 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.532 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.576 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.532 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.544 n_q1=284 n_q2=139 n_q3=358 n_q4=143 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits sigma_overall=0.390 worst_q_ratio=1.100
ref2=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.177
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits sigma_overall=0.533 worst_q_ratio=1.212
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits sigma_overall=0.535 worst_q_ratio=1.092
reference average sigma_overall=0.3885 worst_q_ratio=1.1385
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5_astrometric_residuals.png (929 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273_astrometric_residuals.png (924 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274_astrometric_residuals.png (924 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72238_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 72238_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:21.55 +29:29:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:52.156 +30:00:40.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 05:59:52.156 +30:00:40.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0329 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:50.446 +30:00:09.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 05:59:50.446 +30:00:09.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0365 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:52.156 +30:00:40.44
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:50.446 +30:00:09.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01050 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kPNJeKy3IU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lqlqPL5yhJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KgkL1MMaTx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MCwlH4dpiu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 290119 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5613 to 99.6890 deg, Dec +24.3182 to +35.3067 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5613 to 99.6890 deg, Dec 24.3182 to 35.3067 deg
Loaded 17188 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6381 out of 14244 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14244 out of 290119 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.801100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.801100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 16.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 290119 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5613 to 99.6890 deg, Dec +24.3182 to +35.3067 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5613 to 99.6890 deg, Dec 24.3182 to 35.3067 deg
Loaded 17188 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6381 out of 14244 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14244 out of 290119 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits (aperture=5.2)
Read 290640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec +24.3253 to +35.3143 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec 24.3253 to 35.3143 deg
Loaded 17176 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6408 out of 14213 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14213 out of 290640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 79 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
2.3 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
2.0 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
2.0 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
16.2 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
16.2 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 12.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.kPNJeKy3IU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=81179, bad_region=50564, passed=290087
Got 290087 stars (including 170238 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 290087 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 245895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 245895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 245895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=289 n_q2=166 n_q3=305 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lqlqPL5yhJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits 860.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=81329, bad_region=50705, passed=290610
Got 290610 stars (including 170453 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 290610 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 246746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 246746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 246746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=288 n_q2=170 n_q3=298 n_q4=188 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KgkL1MMaTx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1414, bad_region=3559, passed=34237
Got 34237 stars (including 29358 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34237 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 568 to 628 (Dec 23.7 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 568 to 628 (Dec 23.7 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits N_match=925 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.496 n_q1=294 n_q2=141 n_q3=340 n_q4=150 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MCwlH4dpiu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1131, bad_region=3439, passed=32259
Got 32259 stars (including 27770 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32259 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits N_match=926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=294 n_q2=139 n_q3=335 n_q4=158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-52-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_070346_TTUQ2b1x1_669311_MPHnuCiK/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:40:28.47 +28:24:59.2: 12.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:48:19.79 +28:47:24.4: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:52:08.17 +30:31:48.8: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:40:28.47 +28:24:59.2: 12.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:28.47 +28:24:59.2: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8539 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:46:09.10 +29:19:17.2: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:46:55.17 +29:46:02.6: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:52:08.17 +30:31:48.8: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:44:52.04 +32:13:09.5: 11.99 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:08.17 +30:31:48.8: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.5974 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:48:19.79 +28:47:24.4: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:50:43.77 +31:25:49.4: 11.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:19.79 +28:47:24.4: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.7714 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:46:09.10 +29:19:17.2: 12.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:46:55.17 +29:46:02.6: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:09.10 +29:19:17.2: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.6208 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:55.17 +29:46:02.6: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.5273 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:44:52.04 +32:13:09.5: 11.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:52.04 +32:13:09.5: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.3328 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:53:14.57 +29:00:06.2: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:50:43.77 +31:25:49.4: 11.87 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:48:56.46 +27:50:49.7: 11.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:43.77 +31:25:49.4: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.2029 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:45:33.23 +28:35:21.6: 11.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:53:14.57 +29:00:06.2: 12.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:14.57 +29:00:06.2: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.2645 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:48:56.46 +27:50:49.7: 11.76 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:56.46 +27:50:49.7: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.2123 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:45:33.23 +28:35:21.6: 11.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:53:11.52 +30:41:19.4: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:33.23 +28:35:21.6: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0444 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 06:16:34.49 +30:48:07.9: 11.65 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:53:19.42 +33:39:50.7: 12.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:53:11.52 +30:41:19.4: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:11.52 +30:41:19.4: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1297 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 06:06:58.22 +32:10:43.1: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 06:16:34.49 +30:48:07.9: 11.63 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:16:34.49 +30:48:07.9: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9662 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:53:19.42 +33:39:50.7: 11.99 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:55:18.94 +27:07:14.8: 10.92 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:19.42 +33:39:50.7: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.2401 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 06:06:58.22 +32:10:43.1: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:58.22 +32:10:43.1: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8008 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:54:51.05 +30:19:42.9: 11.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:55:18.94 +27:07:14.8: 10.87 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.89 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:18.94 +27:07:14.8: ref_mag=10.89 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5081 delta=-0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:45:21.40 +27:38:22.3: 11.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:54:51.05 +30:19:42.9: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:51.05 +30:19:42.9: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7794 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:51:40.69 +32:22:12.7: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:45:21.40 +27:38:22.3: 11.37 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.38 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:21.40 +27:38:22.3: ref_mag=11.38 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5362 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 06:03:26.31 +27:38:06.7: 10.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:51:40.69 +32:22:12.7: 10.93 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.95 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:40.69 +32:22:12.7: ref_mag=10.95 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1983 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 06:03:26.31 +27:38:06.7: 10.45 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.43 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:26.31 +27:38:06.7: ref_mag=10.43 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9912 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 06:03:32.75 +29:19:58.7: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:59:29.12 +33:32:25.4: 16.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 06:01:19.76 +29:25:55.0: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 06:03:32.75 +29:19:58.7: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:32.75 +29:19:58.7: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7957 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:59:29.12 +33:32:25.4: 16.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 06:01:19.76 +29:25:55.0: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:56:24.81 +28:59:03.4: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:19.76 +29:25:55.0: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8454 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:53:27.40 +27:34:46.1: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:56:24.81 +28:59:03.4: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:24.81 +28:59:03.4: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1294 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:52:48.73 +33:56:56.1: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:53:27.40 +27:34:46.1: 12.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:40:29.99 +31:55:55.6: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:27.40 +27:34:46.1: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4331 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:52:48.73 +33:56:56.1: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:48.73 +33:56:56.1: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4163 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:40:29.99 +31:55:55.6: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:29.99 +31:55:55.6: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8257 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 06:10:48.64 +34:16:38.0: 12.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 06:10:48.64 +34:16:38.0: 12.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:10:48.64 +34:16:38.0: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7433 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_stack5.fits at 05:51:57.80 +31:22:17.0: 16.35 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_stack5.fits at 05:51:57.80 +31:22:17.0: 16.20 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.26 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:51:57.80 +31:22:17.0: ref_mag=16.26 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=12.5983 delta=3.66 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out300902.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out322300.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319090_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319090_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:00.26 +28:21:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319092_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319092_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319096_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319096_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:59.82 +29:56:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319097_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319097_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319102_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319102_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:38.33 +32:31:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319104_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319104_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:24.45 +28:59:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319106_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319106_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:20.52 +32:13:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319116_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319116_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319118_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319118_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:19.72 +32:29:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319121_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319121_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:25.92 +27:13:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319122_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319122_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319135_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319135_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319140_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319140_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319141_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319141_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319144_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319144_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:51.64 +29:34:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319146_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319146_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:09.78 +30:32:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319155_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319155_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319159_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319159_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319161_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319161_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319163_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319163_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319166_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319166_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319167_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319167_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.84 +26:14:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319169_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319169_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319171_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319171_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319174_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319174_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:17.80 +32:36:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319175_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319175_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319176_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319176_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.11 +32:30:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319178_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319178_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:18.61 +29:45:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319179_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319179_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319181_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319181_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319182_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319182_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:19.84 +32:31:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319183_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319183_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:14.76 +32:34:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319184_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319184_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.82 +32:31:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319185_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319185_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319186_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319186_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:22.07 +32:31:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319188_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319188_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:45.21 +29:22:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319190_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319190_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.04 +32:31:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319191_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319191_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319192_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319192_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319194_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319194_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:16.58 +32:31:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319197_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319197_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:46.99 +32:33:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 319198_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 319198_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:21.54 +29:29:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 320631_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 320631_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:22.01 +32:33:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 320929_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 320929_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:20.35 +32:33:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 321321_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 321321_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.25 +32:03:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 322077_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 322077_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:08.96 +31:03:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 322300_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
Preparing report for the candidate 322300_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 322708_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 322708_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 322779_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 322779_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:33.49 +28:34:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 322905_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 322905_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 322918_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 322918_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:16.14 +32:35:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 322941_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 322941_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:33.70 +30:12:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 322944_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 322944_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.41 +27:56:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323244_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 323244_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.62 +27:35:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323277_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 323277_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:24.01 +32:33:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323301_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 323301_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323303_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 323303_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:33.26 +25:41:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 323935_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 323935_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.70 +25:55:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 324828_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 324828_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:11.73 +32:30:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 324858_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 324858_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 324878_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 324878_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 324945_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 324945_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:37.23 +28:40:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 325074_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 325074_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:21.63 +29:34:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 325304_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 325304_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 325773_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 325773_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:38.95 +31:52:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 325801_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 325801_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:13.58 +27:44:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 325852_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 325852_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:19.37 +31:39:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 325995_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 325995_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:12.49 +28:17:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326292_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 326292_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:07.37 +31:03:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326512_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 326512_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:24.66 +28:37:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326654_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 326654_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 326855_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 326855_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:30.91 +31:22:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188617_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 188617_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:16.95 +28:29:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 305181_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 305181_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:33.09 +31:56:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147426_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 147426_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.67 +29:51:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214178_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 214178_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.19 +27:36:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 300902_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
Preparing report for the candidate 300902_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184521_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 184521_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.67 +28:29:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157688_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274
The candidate 157688_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-26_05-53-25_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274 did not pass the final checks