This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.3059 2461247.8059 11.10 20:45:32.21 -13:08:23.6
33.58333 -31.16699 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.287 Nephthys 0 1 1 11.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:45:32.21 -13:08:23.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:45:32.21 -13:08:23.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.8059,11.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.3059 11.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.3059 2461247.8059 9.13 20:09:19.67 -04:56:26.2
37.48443 -19.56339 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3 Juno -0 -0 0 9.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:09:19.67 -04:56:26.2: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:09:19.67 -04:56:26.2: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.8059,9.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.3059 9.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.3059 2461247.8059 12.64 21:00:41.70 -06:27:38.8
42.53356 -31.60376 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.490 Veritas -1 1 1 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 21:00:41.70 -06:27:38.8: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 21:00:41.70 -06:27:38.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.8059,12.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.3059 12.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.3059 2461247.8059 12.83 20:28:12.00 -10:23:32.5
34.41574 -26.16539 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1058 Grubba -3 0 3 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:28:12.00 -10:23:32.5: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:28:12.00 -10:23:32.5: 16.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 26.3059* 20 28 12.00 -10 23 32.5 12.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.8059,12.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.3059 12.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 26.3059 2461247.8059 13.89 20:28:36.92 -07:45:59.6
37.08731 -25.11424 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.872 Holda -2 2 3 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:28:36.92 -07:45:59.6: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:28:36.92 -07:45:59.6: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461247.8059,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260726.3059 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461212.87205516 21.06.2026 08:55:35.566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
First image: 2461212.87205516 21.06.2026 08:55:35.566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Last image: 2461247.80635057 26.07.2026 07:20:58.689 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 21501
Objects passed selection criteria: 21410
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14414
Average stars matched: 14138 (98.0852 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246076 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 03:25:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461212.87205516 21.06.2026 08:55:35.566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
First image: 2461212.87205516 21.06.2026 08:55:35.566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Last image: 2461247.80635057 26.07.2026 07:20:58.689 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 109
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.92
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 85 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 119039
Objects passed selection criteria: 118779
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 86983.8
Average stars matched: 83908.8 (96.4649 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2061380 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jul 26 03:31:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461247.80554315
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits'
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:01.888 -09:59:10.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49
Second-epoch image center 20:34:01.888 -09:59:10.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0699 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:33:59.680 -09:58:38.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49
Second-epoch image center 20:33:59.680 -09:58:38.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0819 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:01.888 -09:59:10.89
Second-epoch second image center 20:33:59.680 -09:58:38.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01282 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LJGr1LN0QV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HB8L8sVFCR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mHPwvKtgoO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vrv2nr6kHe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23162 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5232 to 316.6601 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5232 to 316.6601 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Loaded 9286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7715 out of 8299 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8299 out of 23162 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.654300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.654300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23162 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5232 to 316.6601 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5232 to 316.6601 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.7122 deg
Loaded 9286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7715 out of 8299 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8299 out of 23162 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 22246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5233 to 316.6599 deg, Dec -15.2795 to -4.7122 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5233 to 316.6599 deg, Dec -15.2795 to -4.7122 deg
Loaded 9286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7768 out of 8290 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8290 out of 22246 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
15.5 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LJGr1LN0QV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1608, bad_region=0, passed=23162
Got 23162 stars (including 21534 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23162 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.459 n_q1=220 n_q2=229 n_q3=261 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.460
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HB8L8sVFCR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1468, bad_region=0, passed=22246
Got 22246 stars (including 20755 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22246 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=218 n_q2=223 n_q3=255 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.482
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mHPwvKtgoO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, bad_region=0, passed=6342
Got 6342 stars (including 5997 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6342 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=945 robust_rms=8.411 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=945 robust_rms=0.383 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=945 robust_rms_before=0.870 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.379 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.383 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.379 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=253 n_q2=265 n_q3=202 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.044
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Vrv2nr6kHe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=336, bad_region=0, passed=6250
Got 6250 stars (including 5910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6250 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=944 robust_rms=8.679 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=944 robust_rms=0.380 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=944 robust_rms_before=0.849 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.374 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.380 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.374 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=257 n_q2=260 n_q3=201 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits sigma_overall=0.374 worst_q_ratio=1.460
ref2=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.482
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits sigma_overall=0.397 worst_q_ratio=1.044
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits sigma_overall=0.393 worst_q_ratio=1.113
reference average sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.471
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3_astrometric_residuals.png (952 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3_astrometric_residuals.png (949 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232_astrometric_residuals.png (945 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:45:32.21 -13:08:23.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:09:19.67 -04:56:26.2: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:45:32.21 -13:08:23.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:09:19.67 -04:56:26.2: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:09:19.67 -04:56:26.2: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=9.1297 delta=4.36 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21792.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31004.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30948_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 30948_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.60 -06:36:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31004_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
Preparing report for the candidate 31004_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21792_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
Preparing report for the candidate 21792_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07269_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 07269_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:58.09 -11:49:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:09:19.67 -04:56:26.2
20:45:32.21 -13:08:23.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:01.888 -09:59:10.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49
Second-epoch image center 20:34:01.888 -09:59:10.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0699 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:33:59.680 -09:58:38.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:17.597 -10:00:48.49
Second-epoch image center 20:33:59.680 -09:58:38.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0819 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:01.888 -09:59:10.89
Second-epoch second image center 20:33:59.680 -09:58:38.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01282 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7ExTWhNpI3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eET2s8oqy4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hCE82kyIOb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TKO7ozXSda
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5071 to 316.6699 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6940 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5071 to 316.6699 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6940 deg
Loaded 9320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6423 out of 8312 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8312 out of 129460 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.564700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.564700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.92
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5071 to 316.6699 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6940 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5071 to 316.6699 deg, Dec -15.2794 to -4.6940 deg
Loaded 9320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6423 out of 8312 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8312 out of 129460 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits (aperture=5.3)
Read 128708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5087 to 316.6713 deg, Dec -15.2795 to -4.6942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5087 to 316.6713 deg, Dec -15.2795 to -4.6942 deg
Loaded 9318 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6421 out of 8305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8305 out of 128708 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits (aperture=5.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 105 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
2.4 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
15.6 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.7ExTWhNpI3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=14001, bad_region=0, passed=129422
Got 129422 stars (including 115274 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129422 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=230 n_q2=239 n_q3=235 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.375
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eET2s8oqy4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=34, blended=13778, bad_region=0, passed=128674
Got 128674 stars (including 114751 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128674 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 127529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 127529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 127529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=224 n_q2=245 n_q3=227 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hCE82kyIOb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1654, bad_region=1, passed=46222
Got 46222 stars (including 44500 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46222 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=250 n_q2=270 n_q3=200 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TKO7ozXSda (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1622, bad_region=1, passed=45746
Got 45746 stars (including 44070 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45746 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=256 n_q2=269 n_q3=196 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-19-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-26_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_022143_TTUQ1b1x1_2489752_MNn3Mfkz/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:12:14.56 -05:02:06.2: 13.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:58:50.74 -13:01:54.8: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:18:03.03 -07:34:33.3: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:22:12.40 -08:17:54.2: 13.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:20:50.77 -06:29:35.1: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:39:46.91 -05:48:19.9: 13.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:49:31.26 -09:35:31.0: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:27:18.86 -05:42:04.1: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:19:29.83 -11:52:11.0: 13.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:31:56.85 -06:48:34.0: 13.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:12:14.56 -05:02:06.2: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:14.56 -05:02:06.2: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3621 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:58:50.74 -13:01:54.8: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:20:50.77 -06:29:35.1: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:22:12.40 -08:17:54.2: 13.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:18:03.03 -07:34:33.3: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:19:29.83 -11:52:11.0: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:27:18.86 -05:42:04.1: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:49:31.26 -09:35:31.0: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:31:56.85 -06:48:34.0: 13.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:50.74 -13:01:54.8: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5189 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:50.77 -06:29:35.1: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3321 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:12.40 -08:17:54.2: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6438 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:03.03 -07:34:33.3: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.5453 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:29.83 -11:52:11.0: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2716 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:18.86 -05:42:04.1: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6502 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:31.26 -09:35:31.0: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3041 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:56.85 -06:48:34.0: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6082 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:39:46.91 -05:48:19.9: 13.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:46.91 -05:48:19.9: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6302 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:24:37.30 -08:45:30.9: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:05:54.26 -07:14:36.2: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:13:39.45 -06:24:39.8: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:30:19.79 -09:55:05.1: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:25:12.59 -06:58:05.6: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:39:37.98 -05:23:21.2: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:50:22.83 -09:41:36.1: 12.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 21:05:33.53 -06:34:32.5: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:25:36.83 -07:01:57.9: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:59:02.71 -14:04:07.9: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:24:37.30 -08:45:30.9: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:37.30 -08:45:30.9: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3309 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:05:54.26 -07:14:36.2: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:13:39.45 -06:24:39.8: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:54.26 -07:14:36.2: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3256 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 21:05:33.53 -06:34:32.5: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:39.45 -06:24:39.8: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2130 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:39:37.98 -05:23:21.2: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:25:12.59 -06:58:05.6: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:50:22.83 -09:41:36.1: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:25:36.83 -07:01:57.9: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:33.53 -06:34:32.5: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9011 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:37.98 -05:23:21.2: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2194 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:22.83 -09:41:36.1: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0647 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:12.59 -06:58:05.6: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1668 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:36.83 -07:01:57.9: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9882 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:30:19.79 -09:55:05.1: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:19.79 -09:55:05.1: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1596 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:59:02.71 -14:04:07.9: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:02.71 -14:04:07.9: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9570 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:21:52.06 -09:19:42.6: 12.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:24:32.62 -07:43:23.3: 12.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:17:00.77 -12:35:12.6: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:32:13.94 -05:26:19.9: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 21:04:16.28 -06:21:02.5: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:58:02.06 -14:10:48.7: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:08:54.99 -05:41:31.7: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:35:53.24 -04:54:41.9: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:24:32.62 -07:43:23.3: 12.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:21:52.06 -09:19:42.6: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:17:00.77 -12:35:12.6: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 21:04:16.28 -06:21:02.5: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:32.62 -07:43:23.3: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9666 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:43:00.03 -10:50:57.2: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:58:02.06 -14:10:48.7: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:16.28 -06:21:02.5: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4856 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:08:54.99 -05:41:31.7: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:00.77 -12:35:12.6: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8004 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:32:13.94 -05:26:19.9: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:02.06 -14:10:48.7: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9223 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:52.06 -09:19:42.6: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0689 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:54.99 -05:41:31.7: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3440 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 21:00:07.88 -14:45:59.2: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:13.94 -05:26:19.9: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7892 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:35:53.24 -04:54:41.9: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:53.24 -04:54:41.9: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3906 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:43:00.03 -10:50:57.2: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:00.03 -10:50:57.2: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.3550 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 21:00:07.88 -14:45:59.2: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:07.88 -14:45:59.2: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1846 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:20:45.73 -07:45:58.4: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:17:58.89 -06:08:59.0: 11.06 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:20:23.21 -08:39:34.0: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:26:20.93 -06:08:26.3: 11.37 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:23:33.18 -04:46:34.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:20:45.73 -07:45:58.4: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:17:58.89 -06:08:59.0: 11.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:16:07.08 -07:44:47.2: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:45.73 -07:45:58.4: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0636 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.05 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:58.89 -06:08:59.0: ref_mag=11.05 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4446 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:56:00.63 -14:40:16.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:20:23.21 -08:39:34.0: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:52:37.84 -08:56:45.2: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:23.21 -08:39:34.0: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.1861 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:26:20.93 -06:08:26.3: 11.34 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.36 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:20.93 -06:08:26.3: ref_mag=11.36 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3880 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:23:33.18 -04:46:34.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:33.18 -04:46:34.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:54:45.25 -08:54:17.3: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:56:00.63 -14:40:16.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:16:07.08 -07:44:47.2: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:00.63 -14:40:16.0: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1094 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:07.08 -07:44:47.2: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9727 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:52:37.84 -08:56:45.2: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:37.84 -08:56:45.2: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1095 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:54:45.25 -08:54:17.3: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:45.25 -08:54:17.3: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2560 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:22:59.55 -04:46:16.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:42:25.73 -05:18:41.4: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:27:53.52 -05:39:34.8: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:22:59.55 -04:46:16.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:59.55 -04:46:16.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:12:02.01 -10:43:11.8: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:42:25.73 -05:18:41.4: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:25.73 -05:18:41.4: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3384 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:12:45.00 -07:33:46.7: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:14:51.69 -10:54:43.3: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:27:53.52 -05:39:34.8: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:53.52 -05:39:34.8: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4443 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:14:48.45 -10:54:54.1: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:12:02.01 -10:43:11.8: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:02.01 -10:43:11.8: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4076 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:25:53.92 -06:56:35.5: 12.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:12:45.00 -07:33:46.7: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:45.00 -07:33:46.7: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6451 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:14:51.69 -10:54:43.3: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:51.69 -10:54:43.3: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5609 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 21:00:41.70 -06:27:38.8: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:14:48.45 -10:54:54.1: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:48.45 -10:54:54.1: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7025 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:20:56.23 -10:57:41.2: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:25:53.92 -06:56:35.5: 12.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:31:51.25 -05:35:37.6: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:53.92 -06:56:35.5: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7331 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 21:00:41.70 -06:27:38.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:20:05.79 -06:51:09.4: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:20:56.23 -10:57:41.2: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:56.23 -10:57:41.2: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6754 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:31:51.25 -05:35:37.6: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:51.25 -05:35:37.6: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7834 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:28:12.00 -10:23:32.5: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:20:05.79 -06:51:09.4: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:05.79 -06:51:09.4: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8107 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:53:43.68 -07:47:38.8: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:58:02.67 -15:08:58.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:23:45.14 -05:15:28.4: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:10:04.84 -08:07:59.2: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:28:12.00 -10:23:32.5: 16.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:28:21.22 -13:08:19.1: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:53:43.68 -07:47:38.8: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:43.68 -07:47:38.8: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8993 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:58:02.67 -15:08:58.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:02.67 -15:08:58.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:23:45.14 -05:15:28.4: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:45.14 -05:15:28.4: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9375 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:10:04.84 -08:07:59.2: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:04.84 -08:07:59.2: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0447 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:17:59.01 -10:36:15.2: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:28:21.22 -13:08:19.1: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:21.22 -13:08:19.1: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9476 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:21:18.20 -05:02:13.5: 12.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:20:50.04 -06:54:16.6: 13.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 21:02:53.98 -12:38:50.2: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:17:59.01 -10:36:15.2: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:59.01 -10:36:15.2: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1394 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:41:44.33 -06:29:02.9: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:30:32.84 -05:24:47.9: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:21:18.20 -05:02:13.5: 12.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:18.20 -05:02:13.5: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1233 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:17:52.21 -13:23:57.6: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:07:10.01 -07:18:31.2: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 21:02:53.98 -12:38:50.2: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:20:50.04 -06:54:16.6: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:53.98 -12:38:50.2: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1940 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:50.04 -06:54:16.6: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3404 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:41:44.33 -06:29:02.9: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:30:32.84 -05:24:47.9: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:44.33 -06:29:02.9: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3504 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:32.84 -05:24:47.9: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2630 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:17:52.21 -13:23:57.6: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:52.21 -13:23:57.6: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2760 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:07:10.01 -07:18:31.2: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:34:45.16 -06:15:57.8: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:10.01 -07:18:31.2: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2229 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:40:00.22 -05:59:05.3: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:27:07.65 -04:49:16.1: 13.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:34:45.16 -06:15:57.8: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:27:46.02 -05:41:34.7: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:45.16 -06:15:57.8: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2556 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:33:14.08 -10:08:23.9: 13.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:20:28.32 -06:23:50.2: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:24:12.99 -09:57:17.8: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:40:00.22 -05:59:05.3: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:27:07.65 -04:49:16.1: 13.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:00.22 -05:59:05.3: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4545 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:27:03.01 -08:11:43.9: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:07.65 -04:49:16.1: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2847 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:27:46.02 -05:41:34.7: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:33:14.08 -10:08:23.9: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:46.02 -05:41:34.7: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4173 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:14.08 -10:08:23.9: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2843 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:20:28.32 -06:23:50.2: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:28.32 -06:23:50.2: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6173 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:24:12.99 -09:57:17.8: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:12.99 -09:57:17.8: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5587 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:27:03.01 -08:11:43.9: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:30:04.11 -12:06:26.7: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:03.01 -08:11:43.9: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5054 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:18:03.51 -06:36:11.2: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:42:29.65 -08:38:24.4: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:28:36.92 -07:45:59.6: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-55-35_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0382_stack3.fits at 20:24:15.58 -09:59:19.1: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:30:04.11 -12:06:26.7: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:04.11 -12:06:26.7: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6188 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:42:29.65 -08:38:24.4: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:18:03.51 -06:36:11.2: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:29.65 -08:38:24.4: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6567 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:03.51 -06:36:11.2: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6760 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:28:36.92 -07:45:59.6: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_03-56-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0383_stack3.fits at 20:24:15.58 -09:59:19.1: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:15.58 -09:59:19.1: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7397 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out150660.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out150718.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151446.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149881_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149881_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149882_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149882_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149883_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149883_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149884_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149884_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149885_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149885_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149888_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149888_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149889_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149889_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149891_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149891_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149894_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149894_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149896_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149896_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149897_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149897_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149899_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149899_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149905_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149905_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149906_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149906_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149907_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149907_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149908_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149908_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:25.10 -10:42:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149909_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149909_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149910_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149910_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149913_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149913_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149916_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149916_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149918_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149918_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149919_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149919_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149920_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149920_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149923_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149923_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149924_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149924_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149925_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149925_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149926_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149926_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:06.40 -08:39:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149928_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149928_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149930_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149930_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149931_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149931_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149932_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149932_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149933_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149933_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149934_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149934_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149936_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149936_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149939_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149939_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149940_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149940_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149968_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 149968_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150016_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150016_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:02:13.21 -13:02:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150103_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150103_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:45:32.20 -13:08:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150119_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150119_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:41.56 -06:21:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150296_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150296_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150365_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150365_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150373_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150373_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150407_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150407_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:03.63 -12:35:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150437_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150437_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150452_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150452_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150460_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150460_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:12.31 -14:46:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150481_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150481_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150482_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150482_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150521_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150521_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150572_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150572_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:53:54.08 -06:54:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150581_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150581_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150604_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150604_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150611_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150611_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:19.61 -09:52:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150633_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150633_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150637_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150637_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:19.36 -12:24:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150642_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150642_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150660_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
Preparing report for the candidate 150660_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150664_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150664_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150687_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150687_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150697_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150697_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150698_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150698_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:19.97 -12:37:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150708_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150708_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:09.60 -12:35:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150718_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
Preparing report for the candidate 150718_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150742_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150742_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:06.00 -12:35:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150771_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150771_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150785_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150785_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150837_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150837_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:24.92 -05:38:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150839_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150839_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150840_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150840_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150849_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150849_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150865_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150865_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:47.32 -09:28:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150867_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150867_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:22.75 -07:07:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150928_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150928_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:39.26 -07:01:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150946_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150946_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150958_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150958_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:21.14 -12:41:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150971_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 150971_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151018_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151018_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151105_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151105_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151106_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151106_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151109_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151109_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151116_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151116_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151131_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151131_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151149_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151149_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151153_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151153_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:28.13 -06:01:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151156_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151156_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151198_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151198_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151201_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151201_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151250_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151250_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151299_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151299_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151301_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151301_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151315_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151315_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151379_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151379_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151398_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151398_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151433_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151433_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151446_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
Preparing report for the candidate 151446_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151509_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 151509_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81918_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 81918_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:17.28 -05:30:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03884_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 03884_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:08.49 -14:47:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17666_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 17666_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:03.23 -13:18:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13418_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 13418_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:26:13.27 -13:47:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34610_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 34610_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:58.09 -11:49:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89119_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 89119_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.58 -06:36:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95483_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 95483_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:19.71 -04:56:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23696_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 23696_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-26_02-20-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
