This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.4085 2461245.9085 13.28 04:54:47.55 +37:33:48.8
166.85630 -3.77108 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.61 Danae -0 1 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 04:54:47.55 +37:33:48.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 04:54:47.55 +37:33:48.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461245.9085,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260724.4085 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.4085 2461245.9085 12.63 05:19:46.09 +38:30:54.9
169.04759 0.73250 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 3.5 pix
The object was found in VSX22" Gaia DR3 187782227953543424
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.830 G 14.850 G A
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:19:46.09 +38:30:54.9: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:19:46.09 +38:30:54.9: 13.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 187782227953543424,2461245.9085,12.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 187782227953543424 20260724.4085 12.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.4085 2461245.9085 12.88 05:20:05.51 +37:40:38.6
169.77113 0.30518 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J052005.56+374038.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.170 V 14.380 V 2458345.25670 66.756029800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:20:05.51 +37:40:38.6: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:20:05.51 +37:40:38.6: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J052005.56+374038.8,2461245.9085,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J052005.56+374038.8 20260724.4085 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.4085 2461245.9085 12.79 05:12:00.78 +37:23:09.1
169.07813 -1.16791 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 4.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ZTF J051200.63+372308.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.082 r Y 0.177 r 2457442.78700 78.520000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:12:00.78 +37:23:09.1: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:12:00.78 +37:23:09.1: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J051200.63+372308.7,2461245.9085,12.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J051200.63+372308.7 20260724.4085 12.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.4085 2461245.9085 12.98 05:20:38.71 +37:05:01.1
170.32120 0.05610 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.8" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:20:38.71 +37:05:01.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: K4 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=1.267+/-0.034 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:20:38.71 +37:05:01.1: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:20:38.71 +37:05:01.1: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461245.9085,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260724.4085 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.4085 2461245.9085 12.25 05:30:54.80 +35:56:33.5
172.42178 1.12669 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 3.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0728 Aur
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.400 R1 11.700 R1 70.000000000000 :
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:30:54.80 +35:56:33.5: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:30:54.80 +35:56:33.5: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0728 Aur,2461245.9085,12.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0728 Aur 20260724.4085 12.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.4085 2461245.9085 13.18 05:13:34.69 +38:46:49.0
168.13124 -0.09891 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 4.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J051334.75+384648.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.933 g Y 0.131 g 2458488.49230 29.991272200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:13:34.69 +38:46:49.0: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:13:34.69 +38:46:49.0: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J051334.75+384648.4,2461245.9085,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J051334.75+384648.4 20260724.4085 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.4085 2461245.9085 12.19 05:13:04.75 +37:33:14.4
169.06666 -0.89793 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 3.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J051304.73+373314.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.510 V 13.890 V 2458385.35230 48.877131000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:13:04.75 +37:33:14.4: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:13:04.75 +37:33:14.4: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J051304.73+373314.0,2461245.9085,12.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J051304.73+373314.0 20260724.4085 12.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61200600 18.01.2026 02:41:07.318 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
First image: 2461058.61200600 18.01.2026 02:41:07.318 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Last image: 2461245.90880076 24.07.2026 09:48:30.386 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.70
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24020
Objects passed selection criteria: 23858
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15460.2
Average stars matched: 14665.2 (94.8578 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 132796 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Jul 23 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-167-gea1982e4
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 24 04:51:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61200600 18.01.2026 02:41:07.318 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
First image: 2461058.61200600 18.01.2026 02:41:07.318 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Last image: 2461245.90880076 24.07.2026 09:48:30.386 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 151
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 125 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 179713
Objects passed selection criteria: 179096
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 118626
Average stars matched: 109915 (92.6566 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2014588 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Jul 23 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-167-gea1982e4
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 24 04:59:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461245.90828231
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:27:17.024 +37:59:58.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Image size: 944.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:26:59.272 +38:00:37.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:27:17.024 +37:59:58.79
Second-epoch image center 05:26:59.272 +38:00:37.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0593 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Image size: 944.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:26:58.506 +38:00:58.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:27:17.024 +37:59:58.79
Second-epoch image center 05:26:58.506 +38:00:58.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0630 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:26:59.272 +38:00:37.21
Second-epoch second image center 05:26:58.506 +38:00:58.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00645 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kAdu4lk3qx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tApdvlWhyl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pjtWniGbBL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mSIu3xbPFr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits and wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits and wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits and wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27843 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 70.8766 to 92.1250 deg, Dec +31.9889 to +43.3926 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 70.8766 to 92.1250 deg, Dec 31.9889 to 43.3926 deg
Loaded 16031 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11098 out of 12445 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12445 out of 27843 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.926900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.926900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.70
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27843 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 70.8766 to 92.1250 deg, Dec +31.9889 to +43.3926 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 70.8766 to 92.1250 deg, Dec 31.9889 to 43.3926 deg
Loaded 16031 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11098 out of 12445 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12445 out of 27843 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 27116 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.3508 to 92.6935 deg, Dec +32.1410 to +43.3194 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.3508 to 92.6935 deg, Dec 32.1410 to 43.3194 deg
Loaded 16021 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10961 out of 12446 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12446 out of 27116 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
2.1 pix Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.kAdu4lk3qx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2982, bad_region=0, passed=27843
Got 27843 stars (including 24835 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27843 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=171 n_q2=289 n_q3=232 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.208
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tApdvlWhyl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3147, bad_region=0, passed=27116
Got 27116 stars (including 23937 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27116 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.674 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.620 n_q1=207 n_q2=291 n_q3=244 n_q4=201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits -region wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pjtWniGbBL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=144, bad_region=0, passed=3483
Got 3483 stars (including 3338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3483 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013113 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010490 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.691 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.651 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.820 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.839 n_q1=308 n_q2=217 n_q3=280 n_q4=141 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mSIu3xbPFr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=143, bad_region=0, passed=3747
Got 3747 stars (including 3601 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3747 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.589 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.727 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.861 n_q1=325 n_q2=210 n_q3=285 n_q4=126 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.461
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits sigma_overall=0.445 worst_q_ratio=1.208
ref2=Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits sigma_overall=0.591 worst_q_ratio=1.141
new1=fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits sigma_overall=0.691 worst_q_ratio=1.213
new2=fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits sigma_overall=0.589 worst_q_ratio=1.461
reference average sigma_overall=0.518 worst_q_ratio=1.1745
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049_astrometric_residuals.png (952 matched stars from wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341_astrometric_residuals.png (946 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.60 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342_astrometric_residuals.png (946 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33149_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 33149_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:03.23 +33:08:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06908_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 06908_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:19.03 +35:14:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14476_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 14476_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:55.75 +38:56:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07734_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 07734_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:30.41 +35:23:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:27:17.024 +37:59:58.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Image size: 944.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:26:59.272 +38:00:37.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:27:17.024 +37:59:58.79
Second-epoch image center 05:26:59.272 +38:00:37.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0593 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Image size: 944.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:26:58.506 +38:00:58.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:27:17.024 +37:59:58.79
Second-epoch image center 05:26:58.506 +38:00:58.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0630 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:26:59.272 +38:00:37.21
Second-epoch second image center 05:26:58.506 +38:00:58.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00645 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fpm89tpdT9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.35ekzndpip
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7FdksIHEWp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JoU96UYEHp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits and wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits and wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits and wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 202315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 70.8154 to 92.1472 deg, Dec +31.9889 to +43.3931 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 70.8154 to 92.1472 deg, Dec 31.9889 to 43.3931 deg
Loaded 16059 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8333 out of 12787 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12787 out of 202315 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.787200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.787200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 202315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 70.8154 to 92.1472 deg, Dec +31.9889 to +43.3931 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 70.8154 to 92.1472 deg, Dec 31.9889 to 43.3931 deg
Loaded 16059 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8333 out of 12787 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12787 out of 202315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 212259 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.3349 to 92.7190 deg, Dec +32.1410 to +43.3202 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.3349 to 92.7190 deg, Dec 32.1410 to 43.3202 deg
Loaded 16044 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8107 out of 12844 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12844 out of 212259 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 124 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
1.9 pix Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Fpm89tpdT9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=55, blended=30655, bad_region=1, passed=202260
Got 202260 stars (including 171302 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 202260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 194098 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 194096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 194095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.403 n_q1=169 n_q2=288 n_q3=234 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.35ekzndpip (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=55, blended=32150, bad_region=8, passed=212204
Got 212204 stars (including 179717 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212204 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.600 n_q1=220 n_q2=274 n_q3=240 n_q4=206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.022
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits -region wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7FdksIHEWp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1577, bad_region=2, passed=30224
Got 30224 stars (including 28615 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30224 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013113 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010490 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.677 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.657 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.805 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.854 n_q1=304 n_q2=205 n_q3=295 n_q4=142 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.261
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JoU96UYEHp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1756, bad_region=2, passed=32320
Got 32320 stars (including 30522 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32320 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30617 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30620 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30621 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.767 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.819 n_q1=329 n_q2=194 n_q3=287 n_q4=133 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_044917_TTUQ1b1x1_490003_bMVutaR6/wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:01:12.14 +35:16:21.7: 9.14 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:19:28.45 +36:28:55.1: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:12:26.68 +38:07:18.5: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:56:06.22 +32:55:36.5: 9.43 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:19:28.45 +36:28:55.1: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:19:28.45 +36:28:55.1: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8564 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:01:12.14 +35:16:21.7: 9.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:12.14 +35:16:21.7: ref_mag=9.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7196 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:56:06.22 +32:55:36.5: 9.46 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.45 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:12:26.68 +38:07:18.5: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:06.22 +32:55:36.5: ref_mag=9.45 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0846 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:26.68 +38:07:18.5: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9736 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:02:04.84 +35:37:44.8: 9.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:02:04.84 +35:37:44.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:04.84 +35:37:44.8: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:02:42.77 +35:32:37.2: 10.36 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:57:32.32 +33:01:12.2: 10.87 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:02:42.77 +35:32:37.2: 10.40 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:02:42.80 +34:50:47.7: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.38 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:42.77 +35:32:37.2: ref_mag=10.38 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0786 delta=-0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:57:32.32 +33:01:12.2: 10.94 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.91 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:32.32 +33:01:12.2: ref_mag=10.91 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4978 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:01:27.63 +35:23:06.4: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:58:20.31 +32:55:14.6: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:02:42.80 +34:50:47.7: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:42.80 +34:50:47.7: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7483 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:58:13.41 +32:52:54.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:03:30.58 +36:03:04.6: 11.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:56:26.41 +33:35:12.1: 11.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:01:19.27 +35:44:31.8: 11.04 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:01:27.63 +35:23:06.4: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:27.63 +35:23:06.4: ref_mag=11.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7711 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:03:30.58 +36:03:04.6: 11.03 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.02 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:30.58 +36:03:04.6: ref_mag=11.02 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5493 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:56:26.41 +33:35:12.1: 11.19 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:58:20.31 +32:55:14.6: 11.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:01:19.27 +35:44:31.8: 11.06 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.18 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:26.41 +33:35:12.1: ref_mag=11.18 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0042 delta=-0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.33 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:20.31 +32:55:14.6: ref_mag=11.33 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6714 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.05 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:19.27 +35:44:31.8: ref_mag=11.05 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0076 delta=-0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:58:13.41 +32:52:54.0: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:13.41 +32:52:54.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:59:51.85 +35:28:59.1: 11.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:59:43.23 +35:20:39.6: 10.81 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:18:37.25 +37:44:42.8: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:59:51.85 +35:28:59.1: 11.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:01:22.67 +35:21:40.8: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:59:43.23 +35:20:39.6: 10.85 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:51.85 +35:28:59.1: ref_mag=11.24 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.1410 delta=-0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.83 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:43.23 +35:20:39.6: ref_mag=10.83 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0628 delta=-1.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:01:16.22 +35:24:03.4: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:18:37.25 +37:44:42.8: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:18:37.25 +37:44:42.8: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6135 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:55:39.29 +33:06:40.8: 11.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:01:22.67 +35:21:40.8: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:01:16.22 +35:24:03.4: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:22.67 +35:21:40.8: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1889 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:16.22 +35:24:03.4: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3206 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:03:29.55 +36:06:54.9: 11.03 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:55:39.29 +33:06:40.8: 11.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.26 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:39.29 +33:06:40.8: ref_mag=11.26 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.4354 delta=-1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:03:29.55 +36:06:54.9: 11.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.06 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:29.55 +36:06:54.9: ref_mag=11.06 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.2267 delta=-1.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:15:38.57 +38:20:31.7: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:22:17.09 +37:03:20.1: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:15:38.57 +38:20:31.7: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:38.57 +38:20:31.7: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9570 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:08:09.56 +36:07:14.5: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:30:09.03 +41:17:10.3: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:14:52.51 +39:32:09.6: 13.61 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:00:35.87 +35:29:37.1: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:22:17.09 +37:03:20.1: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:22:17.09 +37:03:20.1: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9607 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 04:54:47.55 +37:33:48.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:08:09.56 +36:07:14.5: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:09.56 +36:07:14.5: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1358 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:14:52.51 +39:32:09.6: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:30:09.03 +41:17:10.3: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:52.51 +39:32:09.6: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2077 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:09.03 +41:17:10.3: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0021 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:59:30.53 +34:49:08.2: 10.73 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 04:54:47.55 +37:33:48.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:00:35.87 +35:29:37.1: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:35.87 +35:29:37.1: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7096 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:59:30.53 +34:49:08.2: 10.77 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.75 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:30.53 +34:49:08.2: ref_mag=10.75 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.5956 delta=-1.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:56:23.38 +32:49:38.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:56:26.76 +32:26:58.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:19:46.09 +38:30:54.9: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:56:23.38 +32:49:38.5: 10.54 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:23.38 +32:49:38.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:56:26.76 +32:26:58.1: 10.34 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:26.76 +32:26:58.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:19:46.09 +38:30:54.9: 13.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:19:46.09 +38:30:54.9: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5786 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:25:57.65 +38:42:35.9: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:20:05.51 +37:40:38.6: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:25:57.65 +38:42:35.9: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:43:07.99 +36:50:47.2: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:57.65 +38:42:35.9: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5693 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:58:01.01 +32:36:28.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:20:05.51 +37:40:38.6: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:20:05.51 +37:40:38.6: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8764 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:43:07.99 +36:50:47.2: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:58:01.01 +32:36:28.7: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:01.01 +32:36:28.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:43:07.99 +36:50:47.2: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9312 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:02:42.67 +36:09:53.7: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:58:04.13 +32:37:30.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:02:42.67 +36:09:53.7: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:42.67 +36:09:53.7: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3293 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:58:04.13 +32:37:30.7: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:04.13 +32:37:30.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:07:04.85 +39:25:10.9: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:12:00.78 +37:23:09.1: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:57:39.69 +32:35:31.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:01:29.89 +33:07:42.3: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:00:34.33 +38:06:37.7: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:12:00.78 +37:23:09.1: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:07:04.85 +39:25:10.9: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:12:00.78 +37:23:09.1: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7937 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:04.85 +39:25:10.9: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5409 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:00:34.33 +38:06:37.7: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:01:29.89 +33:07:42.3: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:29.89 +33:07:42.3: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3875 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:34.33 +38:06:37.7: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8283 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:57:39.69 +32:35:31.6: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:39.69 +32:35:31.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:01:03.64 +33:04:00.1: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:01:03.64 +33:04:00.1: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:03.64 +33:04:00.1: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7424 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:07:47.24 +39:40:02.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:07:47.24 +39:40:02.1: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:47.24 +39:40:02.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:20:38.71 +37:05:01.1: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:57:15.48 +32:44:26.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:20:38.71 +37:05:01.1: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:20:38.71 +37:05:01.1: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9000 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:01:17.14 +32:38:07.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:11:58.69 +36:10:02.3: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:57:15.48 +32:44:26.7: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:15.48 +32:44:26.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:01:17.14 +32:38:07.5: 10.29 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:17.14 +32:38:07.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:11:58.69 +36:10:02.3: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:58.69 +36:10:02.3: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9505 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:30:54.80 +35:56:33.5: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:30:54.80 +35:56:33.5: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:05:58.96 +38:19:19.5: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:30:54.80 +35:56:33.5: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2509 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:27:11.40 +40:00:32.0: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 06:02:53.64 +37:39:16.5: 10.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:05:58.96 +38:19:19.5: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:58.96 +38:19:19.5: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7186 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:02:53.64 +37:39:16.5: 10.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.74 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:53.64 +37:39:16.5: ref_mag=10.74 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3951 delta=-0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:27:11.40 +40:00:32.0: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:11.40 +40:00:32.0: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7337 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:13:34.69 +38:46:49.0: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:57:55.70 +33:03:09.3: 10.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:13:34.69 +38:46:49.0: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:13:34.69 +38:46:49.0: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1789 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:59:42.98 +35:21:52.5: 10.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:57:55.70 +33:03:09.3: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:55.70 +33:03:09.3: ref_mag=10.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7841 delta=-0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:59:42.98 +35:21:52.5: 10.80 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.78 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:42.98 +35:21:52.5: ref_mag=10.78 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6591 delta=-0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 05:13:04.75 +37:33:14.4: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 05:13:04.75 +37:33:14.4: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:13:04.75 +37:33:14.4: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1914 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103231.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out110263.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out245900.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55055.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76725.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84993.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87684.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87944.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 29s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245223_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245223_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:10.85 +39:10:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245236_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245236_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:20.44 +39:20:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245237_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245237_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245255_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245255_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:57.95 +35:10:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245260_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245260_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.78 +39:28:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245262_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245262_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245270_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245270_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:04.92 +35:15:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245287_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245287_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245292_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245292_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245299_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245299_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:25.13 +33:08:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245303_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245303_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245313_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245313_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:23.53 +33:13:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245316_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245316_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245322_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245322_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245324_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245324_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:22.79 +36:25:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245329_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245329_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245339_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245339_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245358_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245358_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:19.94 +38:30:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245403_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245403_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245405_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245405_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245418_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245418_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245421_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245421_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:27.38 +37:19:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245440_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245440_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:57.86 +33:06:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245446_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245446_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.46 +34:49:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245457_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245457_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245458_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245458_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245461_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245461_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245467_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245467_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245479_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245479_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245486_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245486_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245500_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245500_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245515_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245515_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.36 +37:36:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245521_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245521_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245535_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245535_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:54.28 +39:49:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245574_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245574_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245580_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245580_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:44.99 +39:31:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245597_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245597_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:33.94 +35:29:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245604_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245604_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245609_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245609_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245612_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245612_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245621_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245621_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245623_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245623_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:33.76 +33:00:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245626_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245626_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:56.95 +33:06:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245650_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245650_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245654_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245654_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245656_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245656_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:05.84 +39:18:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245674_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245674_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:36.15 +38:39:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245680_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245680_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:28.82 +35:34:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245683_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245683_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245693_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245693_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245702_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245702_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245707_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245707_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:04.74 +35:21:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245714_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245714_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:39.98 +39:21:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245724_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245724_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:34.79 +34:52:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245758_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245758_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:43.47 +37:24:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245761_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245761_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245768_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245768_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245772_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245772_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:26.44 +35:39:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245779_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245779_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:49.22 +37:27:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245815_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245815_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245838_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245838_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245841_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245841_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245856_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245856_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245863_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245863_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245864_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245864_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:22.66 +40:02:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245877_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245877_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245898_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245898_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245900_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 245900_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245905_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245905_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245921_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 245921_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104499_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 104499_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:36.57 +38:35:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103231_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 103231_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110147_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 110147_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.62 +38:59:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219370_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 219370_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219686_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 219686_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105370_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 105370_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77405_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 77405_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:39.64 +37:00:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87684_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 87684_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68598_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 68598_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114669_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 114669_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:15.09 +39:06:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46899_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 46899_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:19.05 +35:14:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224940_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 224940_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43591_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 43591_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:31.16 +35:17:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198845_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 198845_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:44.58 +40:44:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57742_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 57742_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53361_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 53361_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:30.46 +35:23:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223717_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 223717_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223629_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 223629_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79222_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 79222_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:11.19 +37:20:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84993_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 84993_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92174_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 92174_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230857_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 230857_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11737_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 11737_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:59.38 +33:26:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221559_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 221559_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04164_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 04164_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57731_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 57731_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:03.00 +35:53:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49281_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 49281_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:22.07 +35:37:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76725_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 76725_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220534_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 220534_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39993_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 39993_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:12.72 +35:03:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63152_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 63152_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220189_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 220189_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220169_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 220169_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98971_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 98971_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16031_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 16031_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:15.72 +33:32:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05380_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 05380_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:25.17 +32:57:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41258_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 41258_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:56.91 +34:57:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92668_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 92668_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:07.38 +37:57:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70444_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 70444_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:56.48 +36:52:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55055_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 55055_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19485_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 19485_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:01.48 +33:51:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96772_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 96772_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130823_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 130823_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96748_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 96748_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:45.04 +38:10:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84344_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 84344_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03736_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 03736_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110263_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 110263_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44258_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 44258_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111430_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 111430_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:55.73 +38:56:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138006_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 138006_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31318_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 31318_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.72 +34:35:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87944_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 87944_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103006_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103006_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:01.17 +38:28:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235817_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 235817_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_04-48-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
