This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.3715 2461245.8715 14.29 01:40:21.30 +29:00:04.8
135.64429 -32.66002 galactic Tri Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1467 Mashona -1 -2 2 14.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:40:21.30 +29:00:04.8: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:40:21.30 +29:00:04.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 24.3715* 01 40 21.30 +29 00 04.8 14.3 U Tri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461245.8715,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260724.3715 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 24.3715* 02 19 17.29 +28 57 15.0 14.0 U Tri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461245.8715,14.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260724.3715 14.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.3715 2461245.8715 13.95 01:58:25.74 +27:45:25.0
140.59333 -32.80691 galactic Tri Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.686 Gersuind -1 -2 2 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:58:25.74 +27:45:25.0: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:58:25.74 +27:45:25.0: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 24.3715* 01 58 25.74 +27 45 25.0 13.9 U Tri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461245.8715,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260724.3715 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
First image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Last image: 2461245.87173097 24.07.2026 08:55:07.556 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11627
Objects passed selection criteria: 11609
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10402.8
Average stars matched: 10180.5 (97.8635 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120264 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Jul 23 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-167-gea1982e4
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 24 05:36:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
First image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Last image: 2461245.87173097 24.07.2026 08:55:07.556 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 69
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 45 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 68191
Objects passed selection criteria: 68046
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 60177.8
Average stars matched: 58725.5 (97.5867 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1923984 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Jul 23 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-167-gea1982e4
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 24 05:40:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461245.87119337
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits'
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits'
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits'
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:59:55.060 +29:58:41.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32
Second-epoch image center 01:59:55.060 +29:58:41.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0268 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:59:55.285 +29:58:10.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32
Second-epoch image center 01:59:55.285 +29:58:10.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0327 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:59:55.060 +29:58:41.83
Second-epoch second image center 01:59:55.285 +29:58:10.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00888 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pJCGtvAXZb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2WsUPUY0ck
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z9FnF6Fb9S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IQNgW3RzI5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 12225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.6044 to 39.6615 deg, Dec +24.4131 to +35.2963 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.6044 to 39.6615 deg, Dec 24.4131 to 35.2963 deg
Loaded 8371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6352 out of 6782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6782 out of 12225 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.928900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.928900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 12225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.6044 to 39.6615 deg, Dec +24.4131 to +35.2963 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.6044 to 39.6615 deg, Dec 24.4131 to 35.2963 deg
Loaded 8371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6352 out of 6782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6782 out of 12225 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 12296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.6044 to 39.7012 deg, Dec +24.4131 to +35.3109 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.6044 to 39.7012 deg, Dec 24.4131 to 35.3109 deg
Loaded 8408 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6364 out of 6800 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6800 out of 12296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
2.0 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
15.4 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pJCGtvAXZb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=932, bad_region=0, passed=12225
Got 12225 stars (including 11278 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12225 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=207 n_q2=302 n_q3=208 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2WsUPUY0ck (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=960, bad_region=0, passed=12296
Got 12296 stars (including 11323 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=208 n_q2=301 n_q3=210 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Z9FnF6Fb9S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=446, bad_region=0, passed=8615
Got 8615 stars (including 8160 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8615 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=233 n_q2=191 n_q3=305 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IQNgW3RzI5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=462, bad_region=0, passed=8706
Got 8706 stars (including 8238 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8706 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8565 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=234 n_q2=191 n_q3=303 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.022
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits sigma_overall=0.347 worst_q_ratio=1.091
ref2=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.216
new1=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits sigma_overall=0.344 worst_q_ratio=1.051
new2=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.022
reference average sigma_overall=0.32 worst_q_ratio=1.1535
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20768_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 20768_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:56:47.04 +34:01:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20811_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 20811_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:07:50.88 +27:56:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00571_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 00571_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:01.81 +34:15:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:59:55.060 +29:58:41.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32
Second-epoch image center 01:59:55.060 +29:58:41.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0268 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:59:55.285 +29:58:10.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32
Second-epoch image center 01:59:55.285 +29:58:10.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0327 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:59:55.060 +29:58:41.83
Second-epoch second image center 01:59:55.285 +29:58:10.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00888 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DfrzbwX2XI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MsvkrWK8Aj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits &> /tmp/tmp.usx9Zv8pnH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KUlsxjZxl4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 73246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.5719 to 39.6906 deg, Dec +24.3227 to +35.3068 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.5719 to 39.6906 deg, Dec 24.3227 to 35.3068 deg
Loaded 8456 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5809 out of 6892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6892 out of 73246 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 73246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.5719 to 39.6906 deg, Dec +24.3227 to +35.3068 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.5719 to 39.6906 deg, Dec 24.3227 to 35.3068 deg
Loaded 8456 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5809 out of 6892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6892 out of 73246 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 72377 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.5785 to 39.7012 deg, Dec +24.3308 to +35.3160 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.5785 to 39.7012 deg, Dec 24.3308 to 35.3160 deg
Loaded 8467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5844 out of 6896 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6896 out of 72377 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 69 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
2.0 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
15.6 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DfrzbwX2XI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4778, bad_region=6, passed=73229
Got 73229 stars (including 68317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73229 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72658 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72658 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72658 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=214 n_q2=289 n_q3=215 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MsvkrWK8Aj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4568, bad_region=8, passed=72353
Got 72353 stars (including 67651 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72353 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71649 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=214 n_q2=285 n_q3=221 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.usx9Zv8pnH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1960, bad_region=4, passed=48068
Got 48068 stars (including 46037 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48068 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=239 n_q2=191 n_q3=291 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KUlsxjZxl4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2052, bad_region=6, passed=48498
Got 48498 stars (including 46372 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48498 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=238 n_q2=194 n_q3=292 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.034
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-54-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0328.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_035547_TTUQ1b1x1_131068_uvJXyDMf/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:01:48.64 +34:37:09.6: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:08:07.76 +26:34:31.7: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:33:39.42 +26:51:29.8: 15.02 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:38:14.40 +29:46:02.0: 14.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 02:01:48.64 +34:37:09.6: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:01:48.64 +34:37:09.6: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5784 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 02:08:07.76 +26:34:31.7: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:33:39.42 +26:51:29.8: 15.13 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:08:07.76 +26:34:31.7: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3382 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:33:39.42 +26:51:29.8: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6105 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:38:14.40 +29:46:02.0: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:43:03.39 +31:01:41.4: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:38:14.40 +29:46:02.0: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2774 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:59:36.04 +27:39:27.9: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:48:27.39 +31:33:06.9: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:43:03.39 +31:01:41.4: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:43:03.39 +31:01:41.4: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4723 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:59:36.04 +27:39:27.9: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:59:36.04 +27:39:27.9: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4328 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:27:16.83 +33:34:43.3: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:48:27.39 +31:33:06.9: 13.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:48:27.39 +31:33:06.9: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2752 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:51:42.12 +33:45:28.9: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:39:46.29 +30:05:06.4: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 02:27:16.83 +33:34:43.3: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:27:16.83 +33:34:43.3: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4211 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:51:42.12 +33:45:28.9: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:51:42.12 +33:45:28.9: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7124 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:39:46.29 +30:05:06.4: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:39:46.29 +30:05:06.4: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6320 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:35:08.56 +28:43:11.6: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:43:02.29 +31:01:25.2: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:43:02.29 +31:01:25.2: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:35:08.56 +28:43:11.6: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:43:02.29 +31:01:25.2: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7928 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:35:08.56 +28:43:11.6: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8592 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:35:55.25 +30:44:38.3: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:59:16.76 +34:32:17.8: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:59:16.76 +34:32:17.8: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:32:33.17 +29:39:11.0: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:59:16.76 +34:32:17.8: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8421 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:35:55.25 +30:44:38.3: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:35:55.25 +30:44:38.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8931 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:10:20.56 +25:24:46.6: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:13:13.17 +32:24:12.2: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:28:00.97 +31:50:52.0: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:32:33.17 +29:39:11.0: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:32:33.17 +29:39:11.0: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9761 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 02:10:20.56 +25:24:46.6: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:10:20.56 +25:24:46.6: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8253 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:56:01.67 +29:51:26.9: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 02:13:13.17 +32:24:12.2: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 02:28:00.97 +31:50:52.0: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:13:13.17 +32:24:12.2: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9887 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:28:00.97 +31:50:52.0: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9280 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:59:36.97 +27:39:00.1: 14.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:40:21.30 +29:00:04.8: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:56:01.67 +29:51:26.9: 14.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:56:01.67 +29:51:26.9: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0370 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:59:36.97 +27:39:00.1: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:59:36.97 +27:39:00.1: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0941 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:44:00.86 +32:44:47.8: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:59:29.87 +32:57:38.6: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:29:52.03 +31:55:48.1: 14.39 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:40:21.30 +29:00:04.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:59:29.87 +32:57:38.6: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:59:29.87 +32:57:38.6: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1073 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:44:00.86 +32:44:47.8: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:44:00.86 +32:44:47.8: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1179 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:29:52.03 +31:55:48.1: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:29:52.03 +31:55:48.1: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2604 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:53:40.74 +29:43:29.8: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:06:10.68 +27:24:30.8: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:53:40.74 +29:43:29.8: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:53:40.74 +29:43:29.8: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2362 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 02:06:10.68 +27:24:30.8: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:06:10.68 +27:24:30.8: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2467 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:05:51.09 +30:46:02.1: 14.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:41:41.84 +30:31:07.9: 14.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 02:05:51.09 +30:46:02.1: 14.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:05:51.09 +30:46:02.1: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3184 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:28:36.17 +31:37:00.1: 14.82 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:45:40.08 +32:47:24.1: 16.20 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:41:41.84 +30:31:07.9: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:41:41.84 +30:31:07.9: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4231 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:58:25.74 +27:45:25.0: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:28:36.17 +31:37:00.1: 14.82 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:28:36.17 +31:37:00.1: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5971 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:45:40.08 +32:47:24.1: 15.68 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.82 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:45:40.08 +32:47:24.1: ref_mag=15.82 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.9130 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:58:25.74 +27:45:25.0: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out88829.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66733.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88629.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 27s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88126_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88126_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88130_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88130_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88134_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88134_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88136_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88136_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:08.60 +30:14:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88141_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88141_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:51:41.72 +30:19:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88142_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88142_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88144_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88144_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:09:22.68 +28:22:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88145_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88145_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:27:14.18 +28:59:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88190_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88190_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:09:29.36 +25:57:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88345_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88345_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:01.70 +33:53:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88356_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88356_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:38.17 +33:19:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88377_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88377_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:31:50.03 +28:50:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88397_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88397_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88420_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88420_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88434_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88434_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88437_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88437_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:15.68 +30:34:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88443_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88443_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88451_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88451_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:55:04.19 +27:16:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88457_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88457_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88469_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88469_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88471_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88471_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:15:47.40 +33:20:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88474_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88474_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:19.60 +32:43:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88479_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88479_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:01:10.72 +25:11:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88480_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88480_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:17.95 +33:51:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88486_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88486_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:58:08.39 +31:05:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88505_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88505_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:36.72 +31:31:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88510_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88510_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:50:34.41 +27:57:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88522_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88522_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88527_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88527_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88531_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88531_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:14:02.76 +34:38:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88533_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88533_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88537_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88537_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:11:10.78 +25:57:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88540_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88540_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:24:55.99 +28:50:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88547_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88547_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:20:15.26 +29:48:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88548_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88548_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88549_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88549_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:39:26.23 +27:11:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88551_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88551_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:03:34.23 +25:10:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88553_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88553_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:18.72 +29:40:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88565_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88565_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88566_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88566_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:44:09.85 +30:29:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88582_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88582_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:45:38.64 +34:16:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88592_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88592_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88604_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88604_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88608_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88608_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:32:08.51 +30:44:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88609_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88609_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:49:19.33 +32:26:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88612_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88612_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88614_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88614_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88619_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88619_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:02:13.53 +34:39:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88620_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88620_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88629_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
Preparing report for the candidate 88629_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88630_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88630_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88634_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88634_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:44:03.48 +34:44:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88636_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88636_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88637_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88637_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88638_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
Preparing report for the candidate 88638_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88670_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88670_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:54:41.67 +31:50:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88672_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88672_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88710_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88710_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88725_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88725_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88744_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88744_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:16.09 +27:36:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88764_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88764_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88781_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88781_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88803_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88803_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:36:36.95 +32:00:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88829_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 88829_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:45:40.08 +32:47:24.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.306 305449935129519872 026.41723053356 +32.79033451915 15.4761 15.0504 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.306#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66733_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
Preparing report for the candidate 66733_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08905_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 08905_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:15.79 +33:57:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68673_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 68673_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:07:50.89 +27:56:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02802_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 02802_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:01.78 +34:15:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10047_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329
The candidate 10047_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_03-55-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329 did not pass the final checks