NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cyg-05-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
Field Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits
Field Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits
Field Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cyg-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cyg-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 580282 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 580282 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.png' -> 'transient_report/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits_preview.png'
Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits

renamed 'Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.png' -> 'transient_report/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits_preview.png'
Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 460.6540 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 863.9886 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 978.3833 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 839.2154 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 978.5677 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 840.2431 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.1239 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 27.3700008392334 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 27.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-24T02:50:24.5233862' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-24T07:50:24.5233862' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61245.3266727198 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-24T07:50:34.4279174' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61245.3267873498 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 294.548628402395 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 37.9997214720189 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 70.9358333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 289.672777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.05783212217006 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cyg-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '19 38 11' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.3700008392334 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.3700008392334 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 52.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.9 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.900632 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/d_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits :) Spent 0.665976 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/d_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 27.4500007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 27.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-24T02:51:27.9825853' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-24T07:51:27.9825853' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61245.327407199 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-24T07:51:37.8850618' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61245.3275218173 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 294.548628385507 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 37.9997214018033 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 70.7263888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 289.606388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.05917412095737 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cyg-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '19 38 11' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.4500007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.4500007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 51.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 19.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.900632 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/d_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits :) Spent 0.641775 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/d_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits


fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461245.82678846 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits' wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits' wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits' wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 19:38:10.557 +38:00:40.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Image size: 937.1'x622.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.85"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 19:38:11.640 +37:59:52.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 19:38:10.557 +38:00:40.33 Second-epoch image center 19:38:11.640 +37:59:52.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0138 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Image size: 937.1'x623.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 19:38:08.924 +38:00:47.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 19:38:10.557 +38:00:40.33 Second-epoch image center 19:38:08.924 +38:00:47.64 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0057 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 19:38:11.640 +37:59:52.31 Second-epoch second image center 19:38:08.924 +38:00:47.64 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01777 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vK2vIl2IsH Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8eInn7BXDr Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jPZXQJBxJ9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cZY6gW32rK Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 43325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.8243 to 305.2260 deg, Dec +32.4149 to +43.2814 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.8243 to 305.2260 deg, Dec 32.4149 to 43.2814 deg Loaded 29665 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2052 out of 2323 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2323 out of 43325 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.766500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.766500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 43325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.8243 to 305.2260 deg, Dec +32.4149 to +43.2814 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.8243 to 305.2260 deg, Dec 32.4149 to 43.2814 deg Loaded 29665 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2052 out of 2323 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2323 out of 43325 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 43319 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.8785 to 305.1854 deg, Dec +32.4408 to +43.2702 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.8785 to 305.1854 deg, Dec 32.4408 to 43.2702 deg Loaded 29449 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9827 out of 11096 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 11096 out of 43319 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 42 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits 2.4 pix Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits 2.3 pix fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits 2.3 pix fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits 15.1 mag. Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.vK2vIl2IsH (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=5185, bad_region=11316, passed=43325 Got 43325 stars (including 28044 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43325 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 786 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.47" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28508 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.69" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28585 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.68" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31826 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.20" Excluding outliers - 897 stars left (next iteration limit 871) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits N_match=897 sigma_overall_arcsec=5.174 sigma_q1_arcsec=3.770 sigma_q2_arcsec=2.645 sigma_q3_arcsec=3.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=2.365 n_q1=250 n_q2=262 n_q3=193 n_q4=192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.729 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.8eInn7BXDr (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=5135, bad_region=11297, passed=43319 Got 43319 stars (including 28083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43319 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33259 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33261 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33261 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83" Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.888 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.934 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.018 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.711 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.779 n_q1=268 n_q2=258 n_q3=222 n_q4=192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.jPZXQJBxJ9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=4698, bad_region=6186, passed=37513 Got 37513 stars (including 27095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37513 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 819 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.51" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27649 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.71" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27669 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.70" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29223 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.15" Excluding outliers - 878 stars left (next iteration limit 917) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits N_match=878 sigma_overall_arcsec=2.839 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.945 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.615 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.779 sigma_q4_arcsec=2.706 n_q1=259 n_q2=171 n_q3=317 n_q4=131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.953 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.cZY6gW32rK (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=4743, bad_region=6155, passed=37262 Got 37262 stars (including 26822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37262 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.5 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31532 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31531 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31532 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67" Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.769 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.656 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.659 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.814 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.926 n_q1=244 n_q2=182 n_q3=349 n_q4=172 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits sigma_overall=5.174 worst_q_ratio=0.729 ref2=Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits sigma_overall=0.888 worst_q_ratio=1.147 new1=fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits sigma_overall=2.839 worst_q_ratio=0.953 new2=fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits sigma_overall=0.769 worst_q_ratio=1.205 reference average sigma_overall=3.031 worst_q_ratio=0.938 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299_astrometric_residuals.png (897 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.96 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.74 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134_astrometric_residuals.png (878 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.97 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.66 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:46:07.16 +41:03:43.5: 11.11 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:27:50.48 +41:16:02.5: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:23:00.17 +36:02:37.4: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:52:32.81 +36:07:55.3: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:41:01.46 +34:57:04.7: 9.79 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:48:17.40 +34:08:31.4: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:52:34.58 +36:49:41.0: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:46:07.16 +41:03:43.5: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:27:50.48 +41:16:02.5: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.16 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:07.16 +41:03:43.5: ref_mag=11.16 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7877 delta=-0.63 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:50.48 +41:16:02.5: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6952 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:52:32.81 +36:07:55.3: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:41:01.46 +34:57:04.7: 9.88 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:23:00.17 +36:02:37.4: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:32.81 +36:07:55.3: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3170 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.83 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:01.46 +34:57:04.7: ref_mag=9.83 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1357 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:35:34.28 +35:49:59.8: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:00.17 +36:02:37.4: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9740 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:48:17.40 +34:08:31.4: 11.34 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:52:34.58 +36:49:41.0: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.45 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:34.58 +36:49:41.0: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7028 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:17.40 +34:08:31.4: ref_mag=11.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5558 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:45:38.04 +34:32:28.6: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:35:34.28 +35:49:59.8: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:34.28 +35:49:59.8: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2246 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:45:38.04 +34:32:28.6: 11.24 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:38.04 +34:32:28.6: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5850 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:36:32.89 +41:54:02.6: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:28:13.16 +35:46:44.6: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:27:27.57 +38:10:13.0: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:36:32.89 +41:54:02.6: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:28:13.16 +35:46:44.6: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:13.16 +35:46:44.6: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9984 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:32.89 +41:54:02.6: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9999 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:28:36.73 +39:45:37.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:27:27.57 +38:10:13.0: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:27.57 +38:10:13.0: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9461 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:43:08.64 +41:23:51.6: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:39:46.35 +38:37:54.2: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:30:48.43 +40:01:36.4: 11.48 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:43:32.22 +41:14:28.7: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:32:12.88 +41:16:22.2: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:28:36.73 +39:45:37.0: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:36.73 +39:45:37.0: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0886 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:43:08.64 +41:23:51.6: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:39:46.35 +38:37:54.2: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:30:48.43 +40:01:36.4: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:43:32.22 +41:14:28.7: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:08.64 +41:23:51.6: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1242 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:46.35 +38:37:54.2: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1645 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.51 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:32.22 +41:14:28.7: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1911 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:48.43 +40:01:36.4: ref_mag=11.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1517 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:26:27.68 +35:29:37.9: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:32:12.88 +41:16:22.2: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:12.88 +41:16:22.2: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1140 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:53:14.81 +35:11:08.7: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:26:27.68 +35:29:37.9: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:27:01.88 +38:50:04.6: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:27.68 +35:29:37.9: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1943 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:53:14.81 +35:11:08.7: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:14.81 +35:11:08.7: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1912 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:27:01.88 +38:50:04.6: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:24:34.18 +40:02:52.3: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:56:27.24 +41:07:00.8: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:34:44.95 +36:15:43.7: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:01.88 +38:50:04.6: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2317 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits at 19:32:15.58 +39:06:15.0: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:34:44.95 +36:15:43.7: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:34:44.95 +36:15:43.7: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2304 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:32:15.58 +39:06:15.0: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:24:34.18 +40:02:52.3: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits at 19:56:27.24 +41:07:00.8: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:15.58 +39:06:15.0: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2671 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:34.18 +40:02:52.3: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2271 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:27.24 +41:07:00.8: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2759 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52236_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 52236_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.34    19:58:35.47 +37:19:02.1   2328 3541   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 19:58:35.53 +37:19:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52237_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 52237_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    12.29    19:52:32.86 +36:07:54.2   3032 4286   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.35    19:52:32.76 +36:07:56.4   3027 4294   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52241_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 52241_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    12.24    19:35:34.41 +35:49:57.4   5106 4504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.21    19:35:34.14 +35:50:02.1   5101 4512   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52257_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 52257_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    11.94    19:23:00.24 +36:02:35.9   6643 4348   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.02    19:23:00.11 +36:02:38.9   6638 4356   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52259_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 52259_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    11.75    19:46:07.17 +41:03:43.1   3891 1328   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    11.83    19:46:07.14 +41:03:43.8   3886 1337   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52260_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 52260_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    11.70    19:52:34.65 +36:49:40.4   3046 3864   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    11.70    19:52:34.51 +36:49:41.6   3041 3872   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52261_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 52261_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    11.68    19:27:50.53 +41:16:01.9   5975 1203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    11.71    19:27:50.43 +41:16:03.1   5970 1212   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52262_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 52262_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    11.60    19:45:38.07 +34:32:28.3   3854 5276   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    11.57    19:45:38.01 +34:32:29.0   3849 5285   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52264_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 52264_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    11.53    19:48:17.40 +34:08:34.3   3515 5511   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    11.59    19:48:17.40 +34:08:28.5   3510 5520   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52270_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 52270_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    10.13    19:41:01.45 +34:57:04.6   4432 5037   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    10.14    19:41:01.47 +34:57:04.8   4426 5045   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52271_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 52271_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    9.41    19:38:28.37 +33:54:25.4   4740 5682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55143_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 55143_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    11.14    19:40:29.71 +34:04:01.6   4487 5582   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55603_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 55603_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    11.32    19:36:13.72 +39:26:42.4   5016 2330   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 19:36:13.76 +39:26:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55955_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 55955_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    11.40    19:44:28.77 +39:03:30.7   4049 2554   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 19:44:28.87 +39:03:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57657_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 57657_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    11.80    20:00:57.59 +38:54:44.6   2104 2558   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 20:00:57.68 +38:54:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58361_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 58361_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    11.95    19:27:27.63 +38:10:11.8   6065 3078   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    11.95    19:27:27.51 +38:10:14.1   6060 3086   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58677_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 58677_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    12.01    19:36:32.98 +41:54:01.0   4983 0832   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    11.99    19:36:32.80 +41:54:04.2   4979 0841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58713_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 58713_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    12.00    19:28:13.22 +35:46:44.3   6008 4526   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.00    19:28:13.11 +35:46:44.9   6003 4535   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58989_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 58989_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.05    19:51:12.25 +39:04:51.5   3259 2517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 19:51:12.31 +39:04:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59024_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 59024_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.10    19:33:28.77 +40:30:35.8   5332 1684   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 19:33:28.86 +40:30:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59122_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 59122_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    12.09    19:28:36.81 +39:45:36.2   5906 2119   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.09    19:28:36.64 +39:45:37.8   5902 2128   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59344_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 59344_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    12.12    19:32:12.96 +41:16:20.9   5477 1210   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.10    19:32:12.80 +41:16:23.5   5472 1219   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59434_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 59434_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    12.14    19:43:08.70 +41:23:50.7   4234 1132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.11    19:43:08.57 +41:23:52.4   4230 1140   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59483_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 59483_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.17    19:52:47.88 +40:32:01.4   3109 1629   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 19:52:47.98 +40:32:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59498_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 59498_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    12.14    19:39:46.45 +38:37:52.4   4604 2812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.20    19:39:46.26 +38:37:56.1   4599 2820   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59508_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 59508_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    12.15    19:30:48.52 +40:01:35.1   5649 1963   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.15    19:30:48.34 +40:01:37.6   5644 1972   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59790_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 59790_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    12.19    19:43:32.27 +41:14:27.8   4188 1226   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.19    19:43:32.17 +41:14:29.5   4183 1234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59912_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 59912_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    12.19    19:26:27.61 +35:29:38.4   6228 4694   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.19    19:26:27.74 +35:29:37.4   6223 4703   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59957_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 59957_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    12.19    19:53:14.93 +35:11:05.0   2921 4855   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.20    19:53:14.69 +35:11:12.4   2915 4864   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59988_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 59988_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    12.22    19:27:01.99 +38:50:02.9   6105 2675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.24    19:27:01.78 +38:50:06.4   6100 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60036_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 60036_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.20    19:26:27.13 +34:27:38.3   6243 5330   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (51.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60136_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 60136_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    12.24    19:24:34.27 +40:02:51.0   6371 1931   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.22    19:24:34.09 +40:02:53.5   6367 1940   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60204_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 60204_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    12.26    19:32:15.67 +39:06:13.6   5487 2524   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.28    19:32:15.49 +39:06:16.4   5482 2532   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60216_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 60216_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.23    19:43:57.20 +33:57:39.5   4051 5642   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60306_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 60306_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    12.24    19:34:45.04 +36:15:42.6   5205 4244   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.22    19:34:44.87 +36:15:44.8   5200 4253   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60494_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 60494_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 24.32679    2461245.82679    12.30    19:56:27.35 +41:06:59.5   2711 1245   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.26    19:56:27.12 +41:07:02.2   2706 1253   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60536_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 60536_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.28    19:19:53.29 +34:10:48.2   7073 5474   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (76.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60541_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 60541_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.25    19:27:04.28 +34:10:17.4   6170 5507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (60.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60577_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 60577_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    12.27    19:25:26.11 +34:00:54.3   6379 5597   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (70.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08082_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 08082_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    11.12    19:36:15.18 +34:23:51.4   5019 5384   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 19:36:15.14 +34:23:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 39539_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 39539_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    10.56    19:20:08.84 +41:40:58.1   6837 0926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 19:20:08.88 +41:40:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 18578_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 The candidate 18578_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 24.32752    2461245.82752    10.71    19:40:59.05 +36:43:32.6   4443 3971   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits **** FOUND 19:40:59.10 +36:43:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Last image: 2461245.82678846 24.07.2026 07:50:24.523 UTC ERROR running VaST on the field Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 (wrong field? clouds? very bad focus? -- transient_factory_test31.txt) ____ VaST output ____ --==VaST 1.0rc90==-- Parsing command line arguments... opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius! opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching! opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source! opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted! opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope) opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag! WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars. opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done! opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually! opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored! INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ... Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found. This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file. Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae)... OK Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files. Done with cleaning! VaST was started with the following command line: ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Preparing to process 4 input FITS images... ######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ######## transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search! transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search! transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!! transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3 transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars transient search mode: not discarding large sources ################ Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix We have 4 images to process. SExtractor catalog cache: restored Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits catalog from cache SExtractor catalog cache: restored Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits catalog from cache The number of processor cores determined from /proc/cpuinfo is 24. Running SExtractor in 4 parallel threads... Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1300.fits The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user Parent process says: we are done fork()ing. Waiting for thread 3 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.7,4.7,4.2,5.1,5.6,6.1 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.6,4.6,4.2,5.1,5.6,6.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Waiting for thread 2 to finish... Waiting for thread 1 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Done with SExtractor! TIMING SExtractor: 673 seconds Matching stars between images! No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine. Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-05-17T10:16:48.2818810 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-05-17T10:16:48.2818810 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-05-17T10:16:48.281 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-16-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1299.fits Exposure 20 sec, 17.05.2026 10:16:48.281 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461177.92845233 mid. exp. The reference image star 8055.142 1.485 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8539.416 1.458 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7619.302 2.071 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7628.976 1.655 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7647.247 1.677 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7901.411 1.618 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7974.403 1.357 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8335.153 1.480 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8717.248 1.777 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8862.508 1.451 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 248184, (248183 good for image matching) * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 69 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 50465 * rejected close to frame edge: 898 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.7 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 12 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied. get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.29 Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.3 (5.0 sigma detection) The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.5 80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.9 Selected detection limit= -7.9 Final detection limit= -7.9 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0) Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.7 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 22 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 247674 * detected, using 498/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.025602, number_of_ambiguous_matches=6354 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=1 pairs=225709 inliers=225709 rms 0.34 -> 0.34 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.025610, number_of_ambiguous_matches=6356 225710 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=225710 inliers=225710 rms 0.34 -> 0.34 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.025610, number_of_ambiguous_matches=6356 225710 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=225710 inliers=225710 rms 0.34 -> 0.34 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.025610, number_of_ambiguous_matches=6356 225710 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 0.002 247674 stars detected, 225710 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 169182, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 169182 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 169172 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix -0.00000*Y_pix +0.00227 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 164294 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.29 270148 objects stored in memory (400000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 301592 kB used, 336492 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM Total number of measurements 495858 (495858 measurements stored in RAM) sorting the measurements cached in memory, writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-07-24T07:50:24.5233862 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-07-24T07:50:24.5233862 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-07-24T07:50:24.523 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-50-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0134.fits The star 8565.704 1.643 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8791.183 1.550 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8000.620 4.020 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8965.433 5.117 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8518.936 2.028 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8750.159 1.822 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9440.911 3.052 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7626.580 6.769 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7738.615 6.748 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7746.134 6.503 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 242306 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 91 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 36467 * rejected close to frame edge: 869 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.7 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 17 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 242306 * detected, using 488/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.015166, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4097 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=180501 inliers=180501 rms 1.31 -> 0.42 pix, max corner correction 5.6 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.013248, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3579 181107 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=181107 inliers=181107 rms 0.36 -> 0.36 pix, max corner correction 0.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.013263, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3583 181105 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=181105 inliers=181105 rms 0.36 -> 0.36 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.013263, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3583 181105 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 179.736 242306 stars detected, 181105 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 127482, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 127482 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 127462 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = -0.00001*X_pix +0.00001*Y_pix -0.01743 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 116537 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.36 331349 objects stored in memory (400000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK The transient candidate (new frame position 2092.826 784.867 ; ref frame position: 7497.319 5584.503) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 2079.889 3817.469 ; ref frame position: 7497.038 2553.346) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 4183.693 5252.200 ; ref frame position: 5387.142 1127.807) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 3468.296 794.518 ; ref frame position: 6122.488 5581.142) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 2091.516 1023.557 ; ref frame position: 7497.542 5345.981) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 5618.720 3123.930 ; ref frame position: 3961.657 3262.644) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 4959.079 1764.472 ; ref frame position: 4627.656 4618.666) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst memory: 1991504 kB used, 2024468 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM Total number of measurements 738164 (242306 measurements stored in RAM) sorting the measurements cached in memory, writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-07-24T07:51:27.9825853 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-07-24T07:51:27.9825853 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-07-24T07:51:27.982 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_030100_TTUQ2b1x1_1712900_u4meS2ae/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-24_02-51-27_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits The star 8237.853 1.168 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8902.458 1.454 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8358.448 1.603 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7720.931 4.230 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7599.333 3.440 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7758.438 2.162 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8774.720 1.766 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8858.576 1.734 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7837.352 4.377 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8158.322 4.709 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) READING SEXTRACTOR CAT: 70970 2534.357 1904.151 (0.780000) s=0 v= 0 SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 245064 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 1 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 84 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 36721 * rejected close to frame edge: 895 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.6 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 7 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 245064 * detected, using 493/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.013895, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4604 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=233705 inliers=233705 rms 1.06 -> 0.40 pix, max corner correction 4.2 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.011987, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3972 234371 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=234371 inliers=234371 rms 0.36 -> 0.36 pix, max corner correction 0.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.012005, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3978 234369 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=234369 inliers=234369 rms 0.36 -> 0.36 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.012005, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3978 234369 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 179.725 245064 stars detected, 234369 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 128222, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 128222 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 128202 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = -0.00001*X_pix +0.00001*Y_pix -0.01547 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 120154 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.33 342044 objects stored in memory (400000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 1949872 kB used, 2039528 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM Total number of measurements 983228 (245064 measurements stored in RAM) sorting the measurements cached in memory, writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%) TIMING matching_and_photometry: 28 seconds Done with measurements! =) Total number of measurements 983228 (0 measurements stored in RAM) Freeing up some memory... double free or corruption (out) _____________________ ########### Completed Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461245.82678846 -observatory V36 07:07:13.59 +18:31:42.8 Mercury (1.9mag) 11:07:52.07 +06:13:06.1 Venus (-4.2mag) 05:05:33.91 +22:50:10.6 Mars (1.3mag) 08:29:25.13 +19:29:34.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:46.79 +03:22:04.3 Saturn (0.7mag) 04:09:41.25 +20:51:36.5 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:46.24 +00:18:15.3 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:29:35.23 -23:24:06.4 Pluto (14.4mag) 15:55:55.03 -26:21:50.7 Moon (-11.2mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 24 03:21 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461245.82678846: 08:29:28.45 +19:29:23.5 Io (6.0mag) 08:29:23.46 +19:29:43.0 Europa (6.3mag) 08:29:39.75 +19:28:38.7 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:29:48.50 +19:28:05.6 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:27:22.28 +19:20:22.8 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:29:24.53 +19:29:38.3 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:26:45.24 +19:21:52.2 Elara (17.7mag) 08:33:19.33 +19:16:23.5 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:33:33.26 +19:36:53.8 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:34.62 +03:22:16.6 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:42.02 +03:21:58.0 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:56:18.36 +03:19:25.9 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:56:54.57 +03:21:24.8 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:28.82 +03:17:17.3 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 24 03:22 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461245.82678846: 18:12:49.41 -29:14:01.9 JWST 17:45:12.84 +34:28:09.0 Chandra 04:00:41.93 +56:38:26.3 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 24 03:21 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461245.82678846 -observatory V36 02:55:25.26 +15:59:08.0 17.8mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:08:19.72 -34:37:12.6 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:39:32.26 -68:25:46.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:05:28.39 +32:41:46.5 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 02:53:26.98 +27:58:10.5 16.1mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:50:15.95 +32:05:48.6 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:27:58.80 +26:46:17.4 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:07:55.33 +29:08:51.3 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:18:53.71 +05:12:26.4 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:11:01.98 -11:45:43.9 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:31:07.22 +67:13:55.6 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:06:26.22 -11:30:16.9 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:25:42.84 +66:30:44.7 18.0mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:50:35.04 +30:40:35.0 15.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:10:35.91 +15:34:38.2 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:22:50.33 +41:41:42.2 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:31:25.95 +47:52:54.8 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:02:29.93 -13:16:17.2 15.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:45:42.35 +26:43:30.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:23:19.76 -14:16:48.0 17.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:13:03.42 +21:46:15.1 17.5mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:50:10.45 +03:15:26.2 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:18:18.74 +78:55:16.6 17.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:59:06.67 +45:46:59.3 16.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:35:07.11 +06:44:47.9 17.1mag A/2026 E1 21:39:46.94 -20:43:05.3 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:20:28.67 -02:32:55.9 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:19:50.03 +31:00:59.0 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:37:07.51 +09:30:36.2 17.1mag 63P/Wild 00:53:00.49 -05:05:09.1 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 05:00:55.50 +20:41:13.1 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:43:14.43 +12:20:17.9 16.5mag 88P/Howell 07:16:00.15 +29:25:45.2 15.9mag 93P/Lovas 05:06:57.57 +31:16:37.2 16.6mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:42:45.03 +28:57:27.8 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:14:33.87 -04:26:29.0 16.9mag 124P/Mrkos 05:13:54.27 +21:06:40.9 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:02:11.80 +19:28:18.6 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 08:01:37.95 +13:50:39.8 17.2mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:21:45.45 -20:22:06.4 14.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:23:28.56 +36:25:20.5 15.6mag 162P/SidingSpring 18:09:00.16 +25:46:41.2 13.5mag 169P/NEAT 02:13:03.60 +08:53:03.3 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:36:15.39 -09:05:06.9 17.3mag 235P/LINEAR 20:33:37.09 -52:01:58.5 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:38:54.92 +18:35:08.7 15.5mag 260P/McNaught 06:19:55.64 +37:38:48.6 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:07:05.65 +04:43:25.9 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski 08:47:16.09 +19:04:44.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:13:25.99 +38:02:02.8 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.4K Jul 24 03:21 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 24 03:21 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 24 03:21 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:42:29.978 +07:49:23.31 AT 2026twu 2026-07-12.04 19.6 16:30:23.785 +54:01:13.69 AT 2026twt 2026-07-11.90 19.1 22:10:51.145 +08:26:42.80 AT 2026tws 2026-07-12.06 19.01 23:46:37.559 +04:51:10.62 AT 2026twr 2026-07-12.05 19.48 17:54:33.311 +44:32:29.77 AT 2026twq 2026-07-12.01 18.2 23:51:04.058 +06:06:30.13 AT 2026twp 2026-07-12.05 19.41 22:49:13.425 +07:24:01.48 AT 2026two 2026-07-12.03 19.46 22:00:35.405 +06:42:17.09 AT 2026twn 2026-07-12.05 19.07 17:03:26.927 +50:27:33.03 AT 2026twm 2026-07-10.92 19.51 23:54:42.693 +05:22:53.70 AT 2026twl 2026-07-12.05 19.64 21:58:33.376 +24:52:57.44 AT 2026twk 2026-07-11.02 18.46 23:58:31.597 +05:19:08.07 AT 2026twj 2026-07-12.05 19.14 19:20:36.768 +62:34:13.47 AT 2026twi 2026-07-11.98 18.63 22:51:36.189 +08:04:38.64 AT 2026twh 2026-07-12.05 19.18 23:58:35.603 +05:21:49.48 AT 2026twg 2026-07-12.03 19.63 22:46:12.964 +11:28:28.76 AT 2026twf 2026-07-12.04 19.79 22:40:19.768 +14:34:21.09 AT 2026twe 2026-07-12.02 19.85 00:48:47.944 +22:54:34.27 TDE 2026twd 2026-07-11.13 18.458 04:13:47.612 -54:04:11.21 AT 2026twc 2026-07-10.18 18.328 14:27:34.311 +57:06:47.00 AT 2026twb 2026-07-05.31 19.31 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 24 03:21 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C