This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 24.3037* 21 39 44.79 -20 42 21.4 11.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461245.8037,11.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260724.3037 11.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 24.3037* 21 39 44.72 -20 42 20.4 11.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461245.8037,11.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260724.3037 11.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.3037 2461245.8037 13.08 21:03:07.61 -18:54:51.4
29.03828 -37.25757 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.462 Eriphyla 1 -3 3 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:03:07.61 -18:54:51.4: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:03:07.61 -18:54:51.4: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 24.3037* 21 03 07.61 -18 54 51.4 13.1 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461245.8037,13.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260724.3037 13.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.3037 2461245.8037 13.81 21:11:12.26 -14:45:04.8
34.80614 -37.51988 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1860 Barbarossa -0 0 0 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:11:12.26 -14:45:04.8: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:11:12.26 -14:45:04.8: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 24.3037* 21 11 12.26 -14 45 04.8 13.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461245.8037,13.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260724.3037 13.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.3037 2461245.8037 13.78 21:38:41.17 -14:51:24.4
38.13801 -43.66383 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.653 Berenike 1 0 1 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:38:41.17 -14:51:24.4: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:38:41.17 -14:51:24.4: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 24.3037* 21 38 41.17 -14 51 24.4 13.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461245.8037,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260724.3037 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 24.3037 2461245.8037 13.96 21:04:39.97 -16:26:03.0
32.10093 -36.70915 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.569 Misa -0 -1 1 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:04:39.97 -16:26:03.0: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:04:39.97 -16:26:03.0: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 24.3037* 21 04 39.97 -16 26 03.0 14.0 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461245.8037,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260724.3037 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
First image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Last image: 2461245.80395317 24.07.2026 07:17:31.554 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7153
Objects passed selection criteria: 7144
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6686.75
Average stars matched: 6481.25 (96.9268 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115936 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Jul 23 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-167-gea1982e4
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 24 05:36:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
First image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Last image: 2461245.80395317 24.07.2026 07:17:31.554 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 96
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 46005
Objects passed selection criteria: 45900
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 42554.8
Average stars matched: 41103.8 (96.5903 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 149304 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Jul 23 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-167-gea1982e4
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jul 24 05:40:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461245.80336575
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits'
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:38.903 -17:59:08.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:38.903 -17:59:08.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0862 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:41.633 -17:59:48.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:41.633 -17:59:48.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0749 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:19:38.903 -17:59:08.23
Second-epoch second image center 21:19:41.633 -17:59:48.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01547 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wVZGO5iRKL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vBDMm20zM5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qfkEmKbbWI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XfdeBMMA1W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7063 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6834 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4994 out of 5122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5122 out of 7063 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.585450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.585450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7063 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6834 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4994 out of 5122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5122 out of 7063 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7087 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2603 to -12.6412 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.6001 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2603 to -12.6412 deg
Loaded 6814 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5032 out of 5155 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5155 out of 7087 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.3 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
14.7 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wVZGO5iRKL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=463, bad_region=0, passed=7063
Got 7063 stars (including 6589 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7063 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=253 n_q2=249 n_q3=224 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vBDMm20zM5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=456, bad_region=0, passed=7087
Got 7087 stars (including 6625 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7087 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7018 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7020 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7020 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=247 n_q2=246 n_q3=232 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qfkEmKbbWI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=337, bad_region=0, passed=6378
Got 6378 stars (including 6036 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6378 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=270 n_q2=209 n_q3=266 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XfdeBMMA1W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=337, bad_region=0, passed=6400
Got 6400 stars (including 6053 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6400 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=270 n_q2=211 n_q3=270 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.193
ref2=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits sigma_overall=0.410 worst_q_ratio=1.125
new1=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.103
new2=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.125
reference average sigma_overall=0.4225 worst_q_ratio=1.159
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_astrometric_residuals.png (936 matched stars from wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:48:16.38 -18:13:11.7: 11.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:09:51.50 -19:07:04.1: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:12:52.33 -18:32:42.5: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:12:03.74 -18:57:48.5: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:53:22.73 -17:02:34.0: 11.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:20:49.65 -18:56:41.5: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:58:50.48 -17:07:16.5: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:15:02.82 -18:42:45.6: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:09:51.50 -19:07:04.1: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:09:51.50 -19:07:04.1: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7845 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:48:16.38 -18:13:11.7: 11.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:12:03.74 -18:57:48.5: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:16.38 -18:13:11.7: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7329 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:03.74 -18:57:48.5: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7881 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:12:52.33 -18:32:42.5: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:52.33 -18:32:42.5: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7350 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:53:22.73 -17:02:34.0: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:22.73 -17:02:34.0: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7283 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:20:49.65 -18:56:41.5: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:49.65 -18:56:41.5: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7504 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:20:39.60 -18:09:19.1: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:58:50.48 -17:07:16.5: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:15:02.82 -18:42:45.6: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:50.48 -17:07:16.5: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6631 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:15:02.82 -18:42:45.6: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8000 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:20:39.60 -18:09:19.1: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:39.60 -18:09:19.1: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8238 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:17:58.71 -18:42:26.5: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:17:58.71 -18:42:26.5: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:58.71 -18:42:26.5: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8051 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20422_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20422_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20489_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20489_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:10:37.51 -16:10:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20560_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 20560_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20622_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20622_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20623_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20623_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20624_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20624_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20630_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20630_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20632_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20632_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20633_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20633_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20634_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20634_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20636_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20636_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20641_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 20641_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:38.903 -17:59:08.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:38.903 -17:59:08.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0862 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:41.633 -17:59:48.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:41.633 -17:59:48.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0749 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:19:38.903 -17:59:08.23
Second-epoch second image center 21:19:41.633 -17:59:48.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01547 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ha0wBwPKAu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QtnIuk4Ezx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oiAX7VXDIz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e2RJcRKISf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 47842 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5476 to 328.4757 deg, Dec -23.2618 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5476 to 328.4757 deg, Dec -23.2618 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6862 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5427 out of 5892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5892 out of 47842 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.440700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.440700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.82
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.82
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 47842 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5476 to 328.4757 deg, Dec -23.2618 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5476 to 328.4757 deg, Dec -23.2618 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6862 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5427 out of 5892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5892 out of 47842 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 47137 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5476 to 328.4995 deg, Dec -23.2703 to -12.6356 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5476 to 328.4995 deg, Dec -23.2703 to -12.6356 deg
Loaded 6856 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5425 out of 5895 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5895 out of 47137 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 81 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.1 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
14.8 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ha0wBwPKAu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=2135, bad_region=0, passed=47822
Got 47822 stars (including 45631 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47822 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=257 n_q2=241 n_q3=222 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QtnIuk4Ezx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2107, bad_region=1, passed=47119
Got 47119 stars (including 44945 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47119 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.430 n_q1=255 n_q2=241 n_q3=219 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oiAX7VXDIz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1297, bad_region=1, passed=38323
Got 38323 stars (including 36965 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38323 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=268 n_q2=201 n_q3=270 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.e2RJcRKISf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1356, bad_region=1, passed=38170
Got 38170 stars (including 36761 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38170 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.239 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=265 n_q2=202 n_q3=274 n_q4=192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-16-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-24_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021817_TTUQ1b1x1_1142295_FkcsDQvX/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:48:49.72 -17:34:33.9: 13.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:43:08.06 -18:12:19.0: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:08:48.50 -13:37:05.4: 14.05 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:11:41.56 -13:13:35.9: 13.65 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:09:20.75 -15:39:59.9: 13.94 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:52:41.64 -13:52:24.9: 13.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:51:19.56 -15:12:07.7: 13.80 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:07:30.77 -17:58:23.8: 13.58 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:59:51.96 -18:37:11.7: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:50:58.05 -21:20:23.8: 13.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:08:48.50 -13:37:05.4: 14.17 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:48:49.72 -17:34:33.9: 13.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:08:48.50 -13:37:05.4: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1284 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:48:49.72 -17:34:33.9: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1947 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:43:08.06 -18:12:19.0: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:11:41.56 -13:13:35.9: 13.71 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:43:08.06 -18:12:19.0: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7246 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:41.56 -13:13:35.9: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5820 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:52:41.64 -13:52:24.9: 13.57 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:51:19.56 -15:12:07.7: 13.89 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:41.64 -13:52:24.9: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5463 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:09:20.75 -15:39:59.9: 14.11 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:07:30.77 -17:58:23.8: 13.72 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:19.56 -15:12:07.7: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0062 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:09:20.75 -15:39:59.9: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1532 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:59:51.96 -18:37:11.7: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:07:30.77 -17:58:23.8: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5853 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:51.96 -18:37:11.7: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3846 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:50:58.05 -21:20:23.8: 13.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:50:58.05 -21:20:23.8: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3743 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:50:41.39 -15:21:17.0: 11.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:01:05.10 -12:43:45.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:49:54.14 -13:14:46.5: 12.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:48:15.06 -16:29:53.8: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:01:27.66 -16:51:16.4: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:03:07.61 -18:54:51.4: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:50:41.39 -15:21:17.0: 11.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:50:41.39 -15:21:17.0: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0029 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:06:47.62 -20:11:07.9: 12.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:01:05.10 -12:43:45.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:05.10 -12:43:45.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:01:44.21 -13:31:35.0: 13.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:48:15.06 -16:29:53.8: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:15.06 -16:29:53.8: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4534 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:49:54.14 -13:14:46.5: 12.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:54.14 -13:14:46.5: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9902 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:03:07.61 -18:54:51.4: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:01:27.66 -16:51:16.4: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:01:44.21 -13:31:35.0: 13.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:27.66 -16:51:16.4: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5410 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:44.21 -13:31:35.0: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2340 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:11:53.88 -13:43:27.8: 13.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:06:47.62 -20:11:07.9: 12.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:06:47.62 -20:11:07.9: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8813 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:11:53.88 -13:43:27.8: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:53.88 -13:43:27.8: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2504 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:05:10.74 -18:42:43.9: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:08:52.32 -13:20:10.0: 13.56 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:01:39.80 -16:27:08.8: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:42:35.24 -15:46:42.9: 13.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:08:52.32 -13:20:10.0: 13.38 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:08:52.32 -13:20:10.0: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5903 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:50:16.80 -22:55:29.2: 13.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:05:10.74 -18:42:43.9: 13.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:10.74 -18:42:43.9: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5120 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:07:53.72 -14:29:28.8: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:52:29.71 -12:41:49.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:01:39.80 -16:27:08.8: 13.36 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:42:35.24 -15:46:42.9: 13.53 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:39.80 -16:27:08.8: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5874 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:42:35.24 -15:46:42.9: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5372 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:13:18.39 -13:41:04.7: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:50:16.80 -22:55:29.2: 14.26 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:50:16.80 -22:55:29.2: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3688 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:07:53.72 -14:29:28.8: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:07:53.72 -14:29:28.8: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7489 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:52:29.71 -12:41:49.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:29.71 -12:41:49.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:13:18.39 -13:41:04.7: 13.60 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:18.39 -13:41:04.7: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7197 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:56:00.28 -14:00:26.3: 13.77 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:00:12.96 -13:55:04.0: 14.34 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:38:41.17 -14:51:24.4: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:11:12.26 -14:45:04.8: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:56:00.28 -14:00:26.3: 13.66 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:00.28 -14:00:26.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9540 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:58:06.62 -13:20:14.6: 14.00 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:50:40.35 -20:20:41.6: 13.98 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:57:21.16 -13:04:24.5: 14.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:00:12.96 -13:55:04.0: 14.13 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:02:59.96 -12:45:40.1: 14.79 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:11:12.26 -14:45:04.8: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:12.96 -13:55:04.0: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9827 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:58:06.62 -13:20:14.6: 14.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:38:41.17 -14:51:24.4: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:06.62 -13:20:14.6: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0777 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:35:40.03 -15:27:04.3: 13.82 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:57:21.16 -13:04:24.5: 14.50 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:50:40.35 -20:20:41.6: 14.02 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:21.16 -13:04:24.5: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1131 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:50:40.35 -20:20:41.6: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7214 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:02:59.96 -12:45:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:59.96 -12:45:40.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:35:40.03 -15:27:04.3: 13.76 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:40.03 -15:27:04.3: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7911 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:51:08.86 -13:26:40.0: 14.89 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:48:58.51 -15:00:14.4: 14.32 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:51:08.86 -13:26:40.0: 14.73 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:08.86 -13:26:40.0: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.1593 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:47:34.93 -21:27:39.3: 14.16 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:53:43.62 -15:01:17.0: 14.55 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:48:58.51 -15:00:14.4: 14.50 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:58.51 -15:00:14.4: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9974 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:55:47.95 -13:48:43.2: 14.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:54:20.64 -13:13:38.2: 14.72 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:53:43.62 -15:01:17.0: 14.49 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:47:34.93 -21:27:39.3: 13.98 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:50:46.73 -22:58:17.8: 13.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:43.62 -15:01:17.0: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0750 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:47:34.93 -21:27:39.3: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6072 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:54:20.64 -13:13:38.2: 14.62 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:55:47.95 -13:48:43.2: 14.66 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:47.95 -13:48:43.2: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1658 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:20.64 -13:13:38.2: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.0937 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:50:46.73 -22:58:17.8: 14.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:50:46.73 -22:58:17.8: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5666 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:31:05.47 -22:00:15.0: 15.01 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:48:44.18 -14:17:11.6: 14.33 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:57:38.15 -15:08:15.1: 14.50 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:31:05.47 -22:00:15.0: 14.85 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:31:05.47 -22:00:15.0: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.8378 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:56:01.43 -14:15:28.1: 14.64 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:48:44.18 -14:17:11.6: 14.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:44.18 -14:17:11.6: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0770 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:04:39.97 -16:26:03.0: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:49:25.48 -13:47:27.7: 14.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:57:38.15 -15:08:15.1: 14.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:38.15 -15:08:15.1: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1925 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:00:01.54 -14:52:52.9: 14.50 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:56:01.43 -14:15:28.1: 14.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:01.43 -14:15:28.1: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3011 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:04:39.97 -16:26:03.0: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:49:25.48 -13:47:27.7: 14.33 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:25.48 -13:47:27.7: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1485 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:00:01.54 -14:52:52.9: 14.41 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:01.54 -14:52:52.9: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0620 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:52:12.04 -14:58:56.8: 14.31 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:49:00.65 -14:18:57.6: 14.19 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:49:52.18 -20:33:56.9: 13.97 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:52:12.04 -14:58:56.8: 14.14 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:12.04 -14:58:56.8: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0567 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:51:12.55 -12:52:04.6: 14.47 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:08:31.22 -15:25:14.6: 14.35 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:55:54.52 -12:49:33.2: 14.53 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:49:00.65 -14:18:57.6: 14.18 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:00.65 -14:18:57.6: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9902 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:49:52.18 -20:33:56.9: 13.87 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:49:52.18 -20:33:56.9: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8143 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:51:12.55 -12:52:04.6: 14.37 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:08:31.22 -15:25:14.6: 14.81 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:12.55 -12:52:04.6: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2391 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:08:31.22 -15:25:14.6: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1928 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:55:54.52 -12:49:33.2: 14.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:55:40.81 -13:18:54.8: 14.65 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:54.52 -12:49:33.2: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3533 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:57:06.84 -15:14:42.9: 14.58 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:55:40.81 -13:18:54.8: 14.47 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:40.81 -13:18:54.8: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3158 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:57:15.34 -14:49:30.4: 14.34 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:53:44.15 -14:54:57.1: 14.65 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:42:28.50 -20:32:52.0: 14.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:57:06.84 -15:14:42.9: 14.52 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:06.84 -15:14:42.9: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2656 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:51:34.93 -14:29:25.2: 14.43 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:57:15.34 -14:49:30.4: 14.52 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:55:22.85 -14:35:29.5: 14.46 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:53:44.15 -14:54:57.1: 14.75 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:01:47.62 -14:21:30.1: 14.51 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:44.15 -14:54:57.1: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2736 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:15.34 -14:49:30.4: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2816 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:58:15.07 -14:41:45.1: 14.25 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:42:28.50 -20:32:52.0: 14.27 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:42:28.50 -20:32:52.0: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8659 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:51:34.93 -14:29:25.2: 14.56 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:55:22.85 -14:35:29.5: 14.67 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:59:05.44 -13:03:30.6: 14.64 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:22.85 -14:35:29.5: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2397 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:34.93 -14:29:25.2: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3484 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:01:47.62 -14:21:30.1: 14.46 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:47.62 -14:21:30.1: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2295 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:58:15.07 -14:41:45.1: 14.43 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:15.07 -14:41:45.1: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0370 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:59:05.44 -13:03:30.6: 14.44 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:05.44 -13:03:30.6: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1525 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:58:38.19 -15:24:50.7: 14.33 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:56:44.92 -14:27:24.6: 14.46 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:17:52.97 -14:08:46.4: 14.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 20:59:20.66 -14:22:39.3: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:58:38.19 -15:24:50.7: 14.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:38.19 -15:24:50.7: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4147 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:48:42.75 -21:30:59.3: 14.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:17:52.97 -14:08:46.4: 14.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:56:44.92 -14:27:24.6: 15.00 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:52.97 -14:08:46.4: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4085 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:44.92 -14:27:24.6: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3314 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:52:00.73 -16:35:14.3: 14.25 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:44:42.46 -20:22:39.9: 14.57 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:41:10.40 -18:46:54.9: 14.31 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 20:59:20.66 -14:22:39.3: 14.73 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:20.66 -14:22:39.3: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4845 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:48:42.75 -21:30:59.3: 14.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:48:42.75 -21:30:59.3: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9265 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:52:00.73 -16:35:14.3: 14.38 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:00.73 -16:35:14.3: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0960 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:48:14.53 -16:19:49.1: 14.41 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:41:10.40 -18:46:54.9: 14.50 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:41:10.40 -18:46:54.9: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1241 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:44:42.46 -20:22:39.9: 14.55 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:44:42.46 -20:22:39.9: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9283 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:48:14.53 -16:19:49.1: 14.45 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:48:14.53 -16:19:49.1: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3030 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits at 21:48:37.19 -17:38:01.4: 14.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397.fits at 21:48:37.19 -17:38:01.4: 14.27 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:48:37.19 -17:38:01.4: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2097 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54876.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54225.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54683.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54698.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54886.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53612_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53612_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53614_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53614_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53621_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53621_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53626_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53626_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53629_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53629_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53631_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53631_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53633_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53633_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53634_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53634_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53635_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53635_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53638_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53638_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53639_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53639_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53711_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53711_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53822_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 53822_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53935_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53935_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:50:06.02 -16:50:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53982_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 53982_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54012_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54012_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54092_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54092_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54176_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54176_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54225_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 54225_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54254_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54254_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54295_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54295_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54483_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54483_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54533_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54533_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54554_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54554_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54559_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54559_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54570_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54570_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54581_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54581_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54589_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54589_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54646_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54646_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54651_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54651_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54655_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54655_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54683_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 54683_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54698_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 54698_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54702_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54702_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54756_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54756_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54757_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54757_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54759_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54759_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54771_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54771_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54774_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54774_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54777_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54777_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:23.59 -16:26:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54781_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54781_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54787_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54787_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54791_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54791_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54815_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54815_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54842_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54842_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54860_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54860_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54868_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54868_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54876_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54876_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:31:05.47 -22:00:15.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.739 6828219481983945088 322.77200548308 -22.00394847125 14.6935 14.2402 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.739#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54882_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54882_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54883_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54883_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54886_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
Preparing report for the candidate 54886_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54888_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54888_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54889_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54889_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54906_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54906_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54907_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54907_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54915_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54915_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54916_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54916_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54925_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54925_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54948_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54948_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54961_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54961_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54962_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54962_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54963_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54963_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54974_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54974_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54975_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54975_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54977_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54977_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54981_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54981_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54984_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54984_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54995_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 54995_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55003_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 55003_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55004_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 55004_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55016_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 55016_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55021_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 55021_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55026_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 55026_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55059_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 55059_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55100_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 55100_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55104_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 55104_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55107_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 55107_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55147_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 55147_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55175_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 55175_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46524_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 46524_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:10:37.50 -16:10:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19707_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235
The candidate 19707_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-24_02-17-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0235 did not pass the final checks
