This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4395* 05 02 58.21 +22 45 59.8 7.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9394,7.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4394 7.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4394 2461244.9394 9.18 05:25:29.30 +21:29:39.9
183.85110 -7.83091 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 1 -0 1 9.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:25:29.30 +21:29:39.9: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:25:29.30 +21:29:39.9: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4395* 05 25 29.30 +21 29 39.9 9.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9394,9.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4394 9.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4395* 05 02 58.20 +22 45 59.6 7.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9394,7.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4394 7.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4394 2461244.9394 11.30 05:23:32.64 +22:33:05.7
182.71031 -7.62407 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe -0 0 0 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:23:32.64 +22:33:05.7: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:23:32.64 +22:33:05.7: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4395* 05 23 32.64 +22 33 05.7 11.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9394,11.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4394 11.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4394 2461244.9394 11.89 05:09:24.66 +22:24:42.6
180.95796 -10.39584 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope 0 -0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:09:24.66 +22:24:42.6: 15.54 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:24.66 +22:24:42.6: 15.41 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4395* 05 09 24.66 +22 24 42.6 11.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9394,11.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4394 11.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4394 2461244.9394 13.07 05:22:53.01 +20:57:52.2
183.96050 -8.62938 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana -0 0 0 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:22:53.01 +20:57:52.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:22:53.01 +20:57:52.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4395* 05 22 53.01 +20 57 52.2 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9394,13.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4394 13.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4394 2461244.9394 13.61 05:15:57.48 +23:38:21.4
180.81263 -8.45805 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.179 Klytaemnestra -1 1 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:15:57.48 +23:38:21.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:15:57.48 +23:38:21.4: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4395* 05 15 57.48 +23 38 21.4 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9394,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4394 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4394 2461244.9394 13.71 05:23:09.29 +23:52:46.6
181.54662 -6.96126 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.322 Phaeo -0 1 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:23:09.29 +23:52:46.6: 15.75 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:23:09.29 +23:52:46.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.75 +/- 0.26
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4395* 05 23 09.29 +23 52 46.6 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9394,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4394 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4394 2461244.9394 12.90 05:46:15.02 +21:41:09.7
186.27318 -3.64489 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J054615.07+214108.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.110 V 14.520 V 2457807.80000 59.200000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:46:15.02 +21:41:09.7: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:46:15.02 +21:41:09.7: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4395* 05 46 15.02 +21 41 09.7 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J054615.07+214108.9,2461244.9394,12.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J054615.07+214108.9 20260723.4394 12.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4394 2461244.9394 10.24 06:04:00.88 +21:13:32.7
188.75556 -0.30696 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V0342 Ori
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.600 V 13.300 V 2452988.00000 149.500000000000 M6.5-M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:04:00.88 +21:13:32.7: 11.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:04:00.88 +21:13:32.7: 11.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.15 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4395* 06 04 00.88 +21 13 32.7 10.2 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0342 Ori,2461244.9394,10.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0342 Ori 20260723.4394 10.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4394 2461244.9394 12.40 05:48:36.79 +23:10:49.6
185.27310 -2.40632 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J054836.79+231049.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.550 g Y 1.260 g 2458708.12600 673.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:48:36.79 +23:10:49.6: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:48:36.79 +23:10:49.6: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4395* 05 48 36.79 +23 10 49.6 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J054836.79+231049.1,2461244.9394,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J054836.79+231049.1 20260723.4394 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4394 2461244.9394 12.88 05:39:48.57 +19:44:19.7
187.15412 -5.94473 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 7.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J053948.57+194420.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.120 V 14.890 V 2458495.72820 176.399522400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:39:48.57 +19:44:19.7: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:39:48.57 +19:44:19.7: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4395* 05 39 48.57 +19 44 19.7 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J053948.57+194420.4,2461244.9394,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J053948.57+194420.4 20260723.4394 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4394 2461244.9394 12.15 05:34:23.89 +24:38:57.4
182.30926 -4.39559 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania -0 0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:34:23.89 +24:38:57.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:23.89 +24:38:57.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4395* 05 34 23.89 +24 38 57.4 12.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9394,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4394 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4394 2461244.9394 12.59 05:33:43.71 +20:01:20.5
186.15070 -7.00787 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0533437+200121
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.636 g Y 0.708 g 2458204.01490 116.066583300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:33:43.71 +20:01:20.5: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:43.71 +20:01:20.5: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4395* 05 33 43.71 +20 01 20.5 12.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0533437+200121,2461244.9394,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0533437+200121 20260723.4394 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4394 2461244.9394 11.69 05:32:15.19 +22:31:34.2
183.83881 -5.95403 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J053215+2231.6
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.987 Ic Y 0.694 Ic 2453100.80000 240.600000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:32:15.19 +22:31:34.2: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:15.19 +22:31:34.2: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4395* 05 32 15.19 +22 31 34.2 11.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J053215+2231.6,2461244.9394,11.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J053215+2231.6 20260723.4394 11.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4394 2461244.9394 12.66 05:37:21.44 +17:53:27.9
188.43101 -7.40843 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J053721.47+175328.1
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.480 V 13.910 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:37:21.44 +17:53:27.9: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:21.44 +17:53:27.9: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4395* 05 37 21.44 +17 53 27.9 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J053721.47+175328.1,2461244.9394,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J053721.47+175328.1 20260723.4394 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
First image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Last image: 2461244.93972410 23.07.2026 10:33:02.162 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 31 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19127
Objects passed selection criteria: 19036
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13865.2
Average stars matched: 13341.5 (96.2226 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 127776 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 22 16:05:55 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-166-g55a66cb7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-22)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 23 06:43:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
First image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Last image: 2461244.93972410 23.07.2026 10:33:02.162 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 90
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 92 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 137691
Objects passed selection criteria: 137374
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 102312
Average stars matched: 95376.5 (93.221 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1898860 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 22 16:05:55 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-166-g55a66cb7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-22)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 23 06:52:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461244.93917191
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits'
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:38.575 +21:57:08.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:38.575 +21:57:08.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0910 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:36.251 +21:57:38.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:36.251 +21:57:38.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0788 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:38.575 +21:57:08.56
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:36.251 +21:57:38.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01229 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5f1ekAu0TO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Pvhi6FvTv9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OgyE6R7mjt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DQLfEhl4Pq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 21750 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1679 to 91.6836 deg, Dec +16.3329 to +27.3623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1679 to 91.6836 deg, Dec 16.3329 to 27.3623 deg
Loaded 12332 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9225 out of 10163 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10163 out of 21750 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.923400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.923400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 21750 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1679 to 91.6836 deg, Dec +16.3329 to +27.3623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1679 to 91.6836 deg, Dec 16.3329 to 27.3623 deg
Loaded 12332 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9225 out of 10163 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10163 out of 21750 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3785 to 91.9053 deg, Dec +16.4883 to +27.3012 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3785 to 91.9053 deg, Dec 16.4883 to 27.3012 deg
Loaded 12326 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8851 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5f1ekAu0TO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2103, bad_region=0, passed=21750
Got 21750 stars (including 19623 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21750 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20481 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=153 n_q2=330 n_q3=123 n_q4=321 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Pvhi6FvTv9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=262 n_q2=157 n_q3=293 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OgyE6R7mjt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=320, bad_region=0, passed=6573
Got 6573 stars (including 6246 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6573 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6301 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=199 n_q2=241 n_q3=183 n_q4=301 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DQLfEhl4Pq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=320, bad_region=0, passed=6571
Got 6571 stars (including 6240 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.481 n_q1=196 n_q2=243 n_q3=185 n_q4=300 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.472 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits sigma_overall=0.483 worst_q_ratio=1.211
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits sigma_overall=0.493 worst_q_ratio=1.107
reference average sigma_overall=0.4225 worst_q_ratio=1.2035
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_astrometric_residuals.png (927 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406_astrometric_residuals.png (924 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407_astrometric_residuals.png (924 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:25:29.30 +21:29:39.9: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:25:29.30 +21:29:39.9: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31949.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31936_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 31936_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31949_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 31949_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31987_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 31987_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:42.79 +23:02:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07111_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 07111_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.91 +20:10:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 02586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.50 +17:54:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 04120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:00.31 +18:21:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13438_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 13438_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.04 +23:15:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:25:29.30 +21:29:39.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:38.575 +21:57:08.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:38.575 +21:57:08.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0910 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:36.251 +21:57:38.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:36.251 +21:57:38.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0788 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:38.575 +21:57:08.56
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:36.251 +21:57:38.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01229 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AAqOzBvsxW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rXSrVC0ZNF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L7mxbEQxoj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GJZdsrr4DA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 149155 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1101 to 91.6891 deg, Dec +16.3191 to +27.3626 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1101 to 91.6891 deg, Dec 16.3191 to 27.3626 deg
Loaded 12382 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7632 out of 10495 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10495 out of 149155 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.783950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.783950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 149155 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1101 to 91.6891 deg, Dec +16.3191 to +27.3626 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1101 to 91.6891 deg, Dec 16.3191 to 27.3626 deg
Loaded 12382 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7632 out of 10495 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10495 out of 149155 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3382 to 91.9466 deg, Dec +16.4852 to +27.3055 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3382 to 91.9466 deg, Dec 16.4852 to 27.3055 deg
Loaded 12416 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7186 out of 10476 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10476 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 87 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
1.8 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AAqOzBvsxW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=40, blended=17632, bad_region=2, passed=149115
Got 149115 stars (including 131218 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 149115 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=164 n_q2=329 n_q3=120 n_q4=315 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rXSrVC0ZNF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 158432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 158434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 158435 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=266 n_q2=157 n_q3=284 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.L7mxbEQxoj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=2061, bad_region=2, passed=50150
Got 50150 stars (including 48015 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50150 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits N_match=918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.414 n_q1=209 n_q2=229 n_q3=184 n_q4=296 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GJZdsrr4DA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1926, bad_region=2, passed=49644
Got 49644 stars (including 47646 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47790 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits N_match=920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.475 n_q1=202 n_q2=234 n_q3=181 n_q4=303 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.110
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-32-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_055214_TTUQ1b1x1_2523420_ReFNWoIi/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:34:56.32 +20:14:27.8: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:09:07.95 +21:52:56.5: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:09:24.66 +22:24:42.6: 15.54 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:23:32.64 +22:33:05.7: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:56.32 +20:14:27.8: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:07.95 +21:52:56.5: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:56.32 +20:14:27.8: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1678 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:07.95 +21:52:56.5: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4057 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:01:09.05 +23:19:03.6: 12.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:24.66 +22:24:42.6: 15.41 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:23:32.64 +22:33:05.7: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:09:24.66 +22:24:42.6: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=11.8918 delta=3.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:09.05 +23:19:03.6: 12.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:09.05 +23:19:03.6: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.9933 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:31:40.09 +18:13:16.0: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:40:12.87 +24:31:55.8: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:40.09 +18:13:16.0: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:40.09 +18:13:16.0: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4795 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:40:12.87 +24:31:55.8: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:12.87 +24:31:55.8: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6978 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:04:24.39 +23:32:33.2: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:35:02.35 +24:18:48.0: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:22:53.01 +20:57:52.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:04:24.39 +23:32:33.2: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:24.39 +23:32:33.2: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3401 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:35:02.35 +24:18:48.0: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:22:53.01 +20:57:52.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:02.35 +24:18:48.0: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8749 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:09:56.13 +21:49:36.6: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:56.13 +21:49:36.6: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:56.13 +21:49:36.6: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2499 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:15:57.48 +23:38:21.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:15:57.48 +23:38:21.4: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:23:09.29 +23:52:46.6: 15.75 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:23:09.29 +23:52:46.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.75 +/- 0.26
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:23:09.29 +23:52:46.6: ref_mag=15.75 +/- 0.26 new_mean_mag=13.7012 delta=2.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:46:15.02 +21:41:09.7: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:04:00.88 +21:13:32.7: 11.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:48:36.79 +23:10:49.6: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:46:15.02 +21:41:09.7: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:46:15.02 +21:41:09.7: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8929 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:04:00.88 +21:13:32.7: 11.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.15 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:04:00.88 +21:13:32.7: ref_mag=11.15 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2407 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:48:36.79 +23:10:49.6: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:48:36.79 +23:10:49.6: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3894 delta=1.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:39:48.57 +19:44:19.7: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:39:48.57 +19:44:19.7: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:39:48.57 +19:44:19.7: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8749 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:34:23.89 +24:38:57.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:23.89 +24:38:57.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:33:43.71 +20:01:20.5: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:43.71 +20:01:20.5: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:33:43.71 +20:01:20.5: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5810 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:32:15.19 +22:31:34.2: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:37:21.44 +17:53:27.9: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:15.19 +22:31:34.2: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:32:15.19 +22:31:34.2: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6889 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:21.44 +17:53:27.9: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:37:21.44 +17:53:27.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5979 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out132087.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16635.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out185695.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out185757.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186344.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186600.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186668.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out43398.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out48220.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out63906.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72157.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out85935.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94746.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 15s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185542_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 185542_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:21.93 +23:00:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185543_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 185543_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185556_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 185556_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.22 +18:20:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185557_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 185557_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185564_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 185564_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.93 +16:55:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185565_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 185565_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185566_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 185566_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:05.60 +16:59:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185568_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 185568_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:29.49 +23:08:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185569_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 185569_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185583_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 185583_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:29.29 +21:29:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185626_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 185626_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:42.79 +23:02:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185695_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 185695_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185757_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 185757_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185864_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 185864_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:17.07 +17:02:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 185934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.96 +26:25:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185948_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 185948_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.72 +22:27:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185950_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 185950_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:03.02 +23:18:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185952_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 185952_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.84 +23:48:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185964_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 185964_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:31.49 +24:58:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186001_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186001_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186009_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186009_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.12 +22:38:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186045_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186045_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:01.76 +26:45:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186071_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186071_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.73 +19:34:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186072_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186072_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.87 +18:33:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186117_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186117_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:14.38 +23:18:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:54.77 +23:41:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186142_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186142_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:20.89 +23:48:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186143_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186143_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186156_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186156_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.98 +25:05:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186161_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186161_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:24.38 +18:37:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186166_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186166_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.81 +26:10:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186191_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186191_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.37 +18:33:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186227_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186227_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186254_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186254_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:36.70 +22:27:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186264_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186264_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:19.45 +24:25:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186269_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186269_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.70 +22:03:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186287_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186287_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.08 +23:12:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186291_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186291_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.64 +20:02:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186294_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186294_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.92 +20:10:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186301_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186301_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:20.39 +22:03:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186339_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186339_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.28 +18:59:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186341_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186341_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:02.84 +24:46:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186343_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186343_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186344_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 186344_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186365_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186365_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:13.72 +21:51:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186368_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186368_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.44 +21:37:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186390_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186390_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:39.99 +20:26:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186399_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186399_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.71 +22:40:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186404_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186404_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186411_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186411_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.16 +19:48:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186441_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186441_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.57 +21:46:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186480_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186480_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.21 +23:00:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186498_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186498_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.83 +19:32:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186505_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186505_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:04.76 +18:36:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186563_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186563_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:14.95 +19:35:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186600_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 186600_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186602_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186602_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.50 +24:25:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186605_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186605_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:10.34 +19:41:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186613_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186613_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:37.59 +22:22:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186639_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 186639_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.41 +24:22:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186668_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 186668_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72157_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 72157_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74929_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 74929_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:53.40 +21:35:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25904_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 25904_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:00.33 +18:21:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63906_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 63906_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94746_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 94746_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42236_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 42236_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:09.60 +19:28:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51802_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 51802_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.43 +20:22:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139712_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 139712_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.12 +24:10:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38285_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 38285_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.74 +19:21:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57015_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 57015_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:32.94 +20:37:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123285_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 123285_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:00.48 +25:17:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43398_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 43398_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72931_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 72931_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:50.56 +21:45:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15870_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 15870_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.50 +17:54:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132087_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 132087_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23197_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 23197_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:37.86 +18:24:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129436_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 129436_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:08.12 +24:51:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48220_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 48220_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47289_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 47289_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.90 +20:10:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74760_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 74760_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.10 +21:51:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85935_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 85935_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16635_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 16635_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45664_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 45664_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.08 +20:08:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48506_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 48506_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.44 +20:16:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41301_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407
The candidate 41301_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-33-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0407 did not pass the final checks
