This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4434 2461244.9434 11.71 05:53:00.74 +33:33:29.4
176.84297 3.72875 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia 0 -1 1 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:53:00.74 +33:33:29.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:53:00.74 +33:33:29.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9434,11.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4434 11.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4434 2461244.9434 12.93 05:53:52.79 +26:15:25.2
183.23859 0.19332 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 9" Gaia DR3 3430637945528992896
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.940 G 15.990 G G
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate 1 -0 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:53:52.79 +26:15:25.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:53:52.79 +26:15:25.2: 15.84 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.84 +/- 0.27
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4434* 05 53 52.79 +26 15 25.2 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3430637945528992896,2461244.9434,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3430637945528992896 20260723.4434 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4434 2461244.9434 13.42 05:34:29.34 +33:22:31.5
174.97459 0.34219 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.702 Alauda -0 -0 0 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:34:29.34 +33:22:31.5: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:34:29.34 +33:22:31.5: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9434,13.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4434 13.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4434 2461244.9434 12.41 06:26:50.07 +29:24:13.0
183.96298 8.09379 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 5.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0626500+292414
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.641 r Y 0.808 r 2458428.68600 108.018812900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:26:50.07 +29:24:13.0: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:26:50.07 +29:24:13.0: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0626500+292414,2461244.9434,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0626500+292414 20260723.4434 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4434 2461244.9434 12.70 06:00:43.56 +25:40:40.0
184.51114 1.23452 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J060043.55+254040.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.730 V 14.250 V 2458379.90560 60.828773500000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:00:43.56 +25:40:40.0: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:00:43.56 +25:40:40.0: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4434* 06 00 43.56 +25 40 40.0 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J060043.55+254040.7,2461244.9434,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J060043.55+254040.7 20260723.4434 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4434 2461244.9434 12.96 06:09:13.71 +29:54:01.3
181.73618 4.93425 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.1" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J060913.62+295359.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.230 V 14.920 V 2458377.55720 106.844070400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:09:13.71 +29:54:01.3: 14.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:13.71 +29:54:01.3: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J060913.62+295359.4,2461244.9434,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J060913.62+295359.4 20260723.4434 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4434 2461244.9434 12.61 06:11:50.44 +29:13:06.2
182.60975 5.10878 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 5.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ZTF J061150.44+291306.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.763 r Y 0.161 r 2458218.73680 78.756466200000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:11:50.44 +29:13:06.2: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:11:50.44 +29:13:06.2: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J061150.44+291306.1,2461244.9434,12.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J061150.44+291306.1 20260723.4434 12.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4434 2461244.9434 12.53 06:16:21.75 +31:13:08.0
181.29417 6.90999 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 5.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" 1SWASP J061621.89+311309.3
Type: EA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.710 CV 13.147 CV 2454437.74890 1.752925000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:16:21.75 +31:13:08.0: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:16:21.75 +31:13:08.0: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
1SWASP J061621.89+311309.3,2461244.9434,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
1SWASP J061621.89+311309.3 20260723.4434 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4434 2461244.9434 12.10 05:46:15.83 +31:13:32.6
178.11711 1.31025 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX24" Gaia DR3 3445002480827933056
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
19.210 G 19.870 G 50.170000000000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina -0 1 1 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:15.83 +31:13:32.6: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:15.83 +31:13:32.6: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3445002480827933056,2461244.9434,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3445002480827933056 20260723.4434 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461244.94371492 23.07.2026 10:38:46.969 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25217
Objects passed selection criteria: 25054
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17011.5
Average stars matched: 16500.8 (96.9976 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 132560 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 22 16:05:55 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-166-g55a66cb7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-22)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 23 09:01:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461244.94371492 23.07.2026 10:38:46.969 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 146
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 73 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 193329
Objects passed selection criteria: 192768
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 135626
Average stars matched: 130414 (96.1569 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1954348 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 22 16:05:55 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-166-g55a66cb7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-22)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 23 09:09:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461244.94305229
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Image size: 945.3'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:22.520 +29:57:11.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:22.520 +29:57:11.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0911 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:19.908 +29:57:13.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:19.908 +29:57:13.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0828 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:22.520 +29:57:11.96
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:19.908 +29:57:13.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00944 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x2yKUTATtY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jtLIuSW5nS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cjGYcRnq0A
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R5dAtNT5Qg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec +24.3425 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec 24.3425 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17091 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11926 out of 13489 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13489 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec +24.3425 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec 24.3425 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17091 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11926 out of 13489 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13489 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5948 to 99.6661 deg, Dec +24.3432 to +35.3120 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5948 to 99.6661 deg, Dec 24.3432 to 35.3120 deg
Loaded 17084 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12065 out of 13603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13603 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.x2yKUTATtY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=0, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 24022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=182 n_q2=276 n_q3=215 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.055
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jtLIuSW5nS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=0, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 23994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26213 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=187 n_q2=281 n_q3=208 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cjGYcRnq0A (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=362, bad_region=0, passed=7097
Got 7097 stars (including 6725 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7097 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.668 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.611 n_q1=248 n_q2=172 n_q3=320 n_q4=182 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.381
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.R5dAtNT5Qg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=389, bad_region=0, passed=6995
Got 6995 stars (including 6597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6995 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits N_match=923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.659 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.574 n_q1=240 n_q2=175 n_q3=325 n_q4=183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.367
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.513 worst_q_ratio=1.055
ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.486 worst_q_ratio=1.136
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits sigma_overall=0.484 worst_q_ratio=1.381
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits sigma_overall=0.482 worst_q_ratio=1.367
reference average sigma_overall=0.4995 worst_q_ratio=1.0955
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412_astrometric_residuals.png (922 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413_astrometric_residuals.png (923 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:37:11.28 +34:48:46.0: 9.73 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:37:11.28 +34:48:46.0: 9.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.72 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:11.28 +34:48:46.0: ref_mag=9.72 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3295 delta=-0.61 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31901_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 31901_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.14 +31:35:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.07 +28:29:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.75 +31:24:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Image size: 945.3'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:22.520 +29:57:11.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:22.520 +29:57:11.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0911 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:19.908 +29:57:13.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:19.908 +29:57:13.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0828 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:22.520 +29:57:11.96
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:19.908 +29:57:13.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00944 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A8vb5Q1cT3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BzyX9WlQex
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FZbHkbO2KN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3H695WxVVd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17188 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9142 out of 14161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14161 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17188 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9142 out of 14161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14161 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec +24.3258 to +35.3145 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec 24.3258 to 35.3145 deg
Loaded 17176 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9258 out of 14259 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14259 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 136 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.A8vb5Q1cT3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=79, blended=32424, bad_region=1, passed=212748
Got 212748 stars (including 179989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.462 n_q1=199 n_q2=266 n_q3=222 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BzyX9WlQex (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=32176, bad_region=4, passed=212590
Got 212590 stars (including 180083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 207885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 207885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 207884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=198 n_q2=272 n_q3=210 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FZbHkbO2KN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=3019, bad_region=1, passed=60756
Got 60756 stars (including 57655 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60756 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.558 n_q1=247 n_q2=169 n_q3=324 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3H695WxVVd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2844, bad_region=1, passed=59269
Got 59269 stars (including 56337 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59269 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.649 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.616 n_q1=246 n_q2=168 n_q3=325 n_q4=183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.385
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0412.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_055010_TTUQ1b1x1_2341659_aZbPuWAv/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:42:25.17 +32:54:45.8: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:13.88 +31:02:29.9: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:42:25.17 +32:54:45.8: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:42:25.17 +32:54:45.8: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3676 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:41:11.96 +26:16:28.3: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:13.88 +31:02:29.9: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:13.88 +31:02:29.9: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5344 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:36:11.52 +31:54:35.9: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:31:28.99 +34:51:22.4: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:41:11.96 +26:16:28.3: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:11.96 +26:16:28.3: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5531 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:36:11.52 +31:54:35.9: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:11.52 +31:54:35.9: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5993 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:31:28.99 +34:51:22.4: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:28.99 +34:51:22.4: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6417 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:22.01 +32:31:09.2: 11.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:37:11.26 +34:48:46.1: 9.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:22.01 +32:31:09.2: 11.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:22.01 +32:31:09.2: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.3982 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:53:00.74 +33:33:29.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:55.86 +24:30:33.9: 11.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:37:11.26 +34:48:46.1: 9.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:23.92 +32:33:23.2: 12.39 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.98 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:11.26 +34:48:46.1: ref_mag=9.98 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4324 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:53:00.74 +33:33:29.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:33.18 +25:41:03.5: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:55.86 +24:30:33.9: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.31 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:55.86 +24:30:33.9: ref_mag=11.31 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2327 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:23.92 +32:33:23.2: 12.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:23.92 +32:33:23.2: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.0412 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:33.18 +25:41:03.5: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:33.18 +25:41:03.5: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0330 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:33:03.90 +24:27:30.2: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:03.90 +24:27:30.2: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:03.90 +24:27:30.2: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5658 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:38:47.95 +35:04:24.3: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:23:36.31 +24:29:48.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:38:47.95 +35:04:24.3: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:20.86 +30:53:55.6: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:47.95 +35:04:24.3: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8307 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:36.31 +24:29:48.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:36.31 +24:29:48.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:20.86 +30:53:55.6: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:20.86 +30:53:55.6: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6897 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:09:50.78 +31:24:45.1: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:03:07.34 +31:03:53.3: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:50.78 +31:24:45.1: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:38:20.89 +34:43:08.1: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:50.78 +31:24:45.1: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4956 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:07.34 +31:03:53.3: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:07.34 +31:03:53.3: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8030 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:38:20.89 +34:43:08.1: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:41:51.77 +32:33:15.1: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:20.89 +34:43:08.1: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0301 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:41:51.77 +32:33:15.1: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:51.77 +32:33:15.1: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8811 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:49.25 +30:37:20.5: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:49.25 +30:37:20.5: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:48:08.10 +32:48:58.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:49.25 +30:37:20.5: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9907 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:53:52.79 +26:15:25.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:48:08.10 +32:48:58.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:53:52.79 +26:15:25.2: 15.84 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.84 +/- 0.27
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:53:52.79 +26:15:25.2: ref_mag=15.84 +/- 0.27 new_mean_mag=12.9271 delta=2.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:34:29.34 +33:22:31.5: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:53:14.25 +32:11:27.5: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:34:29.34 +33:22:31.5: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:53:14.25 +32:11:27.5: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:14.25 +32:11:27.5: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4951 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:26:50.07 +29:24:13.0: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:00:43.56 +25:40:40.0: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:26:50.07 +29:24:13.0: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:26:50.07 +29:24:13.0: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4141 delta=1.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:09:13.71 +29:54:01.3: 14.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:00:43.56 +25:40:40.0: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:00:43.56 +25:40:40.0: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6872 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:13.71 +29:54:01.3: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:09:13.71 +29:54:01.3: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9687 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:23.30 +32:23:06.7: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:23.30 +32:23:06.7: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:23.30 +32:23:06.7: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9786 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:11:50.44 +29:13:06.2: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:11:50.44 +29:13:06.2: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:11:50.44 +29:13:06.2: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6083 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:16:21.75 +31:13:08.0: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:16:21.75 +31:13:08.0: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:16:21.75 +31:13:08.0: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5269 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:15.83 +31:13:32.6: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:15.83 +31:13:32.6: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:46:15.83 +31:13:32.6: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0941 delta=1.24 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out243213.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105842.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111257.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out119656.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out168208.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242411.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243225.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243266.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77008.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80109.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242157_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242157_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242160_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242160_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242162_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242162_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242166_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242166_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:12.43 +30:49:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242185_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242185_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:50.66 +25:25:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242189_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242189_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:03.08 +34:11:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:20.99 +34:19:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:09.88 +34:19:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242205_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242205_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:00.85 +27:35:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:17.85 +32:30:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242210_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242210_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:08.10 +27:54:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242212_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242212_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:27.67 +26:06:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242215_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242215_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242219_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242219_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:54.14 +25:28:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242220_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242220_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:59.57 +34:57:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242221_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242221_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242222_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242222_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242223_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242223_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:56.98 +33:47:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242225_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242225_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.85 +28:39:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242226_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242226_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.11 +32:30:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242228_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242228_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:19.80 +32:31:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:14.65 +32:34:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242230_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242230_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242231_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242231_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.04 +32:31:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242232_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242232_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242233_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242233_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:07.73 +32:34:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242234_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242234_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242350_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242350_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.30 +32:03:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242383_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242383_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.47 +34:26:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242411_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 242411_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242429_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242429_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:16.28 +32:35:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242455_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242455_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.42 +27:56:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242465_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242465_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.72 +28:29:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242481_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242481_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.59 +27:35:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242490_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242490_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242492_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242492_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:33.45 +28:34:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242497_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242497_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242499_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242499_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:49.69 +26:44:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242516_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242516_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242519_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242519_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.30 +28:37:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242528_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242528_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.68 +34:23:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242567_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242567_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:11.67 +32:30:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242572_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242572_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242584_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242584_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.65 +30:30:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242590_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242590_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.84 +25:55:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242622_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242622_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:34.05 +33:00:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242631_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242631_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:23.36 +28:38:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242650_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242650_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:15.16 +34:48:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242655_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242655_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:10.49 +32:41:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242662_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242662_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:34.01 +31:12:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242671_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242671_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:05.66 +32:31:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242673_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242673_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:19.45 +31:39:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242684_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242684_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242699_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242699_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:55.01 +32:52:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242702_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242702_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242716_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242716_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242726_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242726_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:09.78 +24:55:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242736_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242736_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:16.69 +32:45:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242748_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242748_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.01 +31:09:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242753_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242753_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.08 +25:05:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242756_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242756_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:03.60 +26:04:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242800_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242800_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:11.60 +34:09:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242811_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242811_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:23.64 +31:49:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242824_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242824_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242878_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242878_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:17.54 +34:30:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242905_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242905_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.09 +33:06:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242940_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242940_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:40.87 +33:56:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242955_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242955_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242989_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242989_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242997_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 242997_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:33.05 +34:48:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243012_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243012_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:18.85 +29:32:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243022_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243022_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.77 +30:30:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243053_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243053_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:45.47 +27:47:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243056_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243056_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243076_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243076_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:29.84 +32:40:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243116_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243116_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:44.52 +31:08:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243123_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243123_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:33.87 +29:00:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243138_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243138_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:57.03 +26:41:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243150_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243150_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:32.49 +30:42:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243156_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243156_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:43.55 +32:59:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243158_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243158_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243166_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243166_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:15.15 +32:06:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243180_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243180_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:48.60 +31:10:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243195_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243195_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:40.86 +32:02:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243213_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243213_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:08.10 +32:48:58.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.524 3448256859153083776 087.03324661343 +32.81626705209 12.4677 10.7233 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.524#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243225_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 243225_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243228_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243228_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:51.04 +33:20:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243240_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243240_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:46.74 +32:30:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243251_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243251_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:42.14 +30:13:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243266_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 243266_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243283_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243283_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.83 +31:57:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243292_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243292_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:50.95 +30:45:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243295_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243295_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:25.78 +32:00:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243305_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243305_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:29.67 +31:54:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243310_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243310_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:24.70 +31:04:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243320_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243320_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:40.25 +32:48:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243321_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243321_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:07.28 +28:15:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243350_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 243350_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.05 +28:36:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:32.80 +29:09:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.73 +29:51:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:52.16 +29:02:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:14.80 +32:22:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:12.86 +30:56:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.05 +28:29:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87651_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 87651_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:42.45 +30:33:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 111257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:03.03 +32:03:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:11.42 +33:40:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 66618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:31.65 +31:56:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105842_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 105842_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158456_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 158456_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93431_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 93431_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:50.01 +30:19:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 167008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:33.82 +25:26:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119656_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 119656_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.09 +31:35:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226537_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 226537_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 153284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:15.20 +27:47:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197078_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 197078_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70434_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 70434_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:37.26 +31:42:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.15 +27:36:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:22.85 +34:38:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 209789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:00.49 +25:17:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.59 +34:35:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:39.99 +32:01:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:28.42 +27:23:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09876_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 09876_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:50.46 +34:41:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 77008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80109_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
Preparing report for the candidate 80109_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.75 +31:24:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 174517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.07 +25:59:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:48.39 +30:50:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.26 +27:29:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:47.41 +29:32:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413
The candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-38-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0413 did not pass the final checks
