This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4261 2461244.9261 10.28 00:27:03.96 +01:46:37.4
110.48840 -60.50453 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.192 Nausikaa -1 0 1 10.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits at 00:27:03.96 +01:46:37.4: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 00:27:03.96 +01:46:37.4: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.4261* 00 27 03.96 +01 46 37.4 10.3 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9261,10.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4261 10.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4261 2461244.9261 12.04 23:35:23.36 +03:44:45.1
89.28105 -54.08141 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.236 Honoria -0 -1 1 12.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits at 23:35:23.36 +03:44:45.1: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 23:35:23.36 +03:44:45.1: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9261,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4261 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4261 2461244.9261 13.26 00:09:22.63 +02:52:41.2
102.62129 -58.32527 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.217 Eudora -0 -1 1 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits at 00:09:22.63 +02:52:41.2: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 00:09:22.63 +02:52:41.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9261,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4261 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4261 2461244.9261 13.26 23:44:36.42 +05:14:21.0
93.91773 -53.82495 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.338 Budrosa -0 -1 1 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits at 23:44:36.42 +05:14:21.0: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 23:44:36.42 +05:14:21.0: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9261,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4261 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4261 2461244.9261 14.14 23:54:23.02 +01:33:36.9
95.07426 -58.19174 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.570 Kythera 0 -3 3 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits at 23:54:23.02 +01:33:36.9: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 23:54:23.02 +01:33:36.9: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9261,14.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4261 14.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4261 2461244.9261 14.06 23:51:50.23 +03:44:51.0
95.66719 -55.93683 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.788 Hohensteina -0 -1 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits at 23:51:50.23 +03:44:51.0: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 23:51:50.23 +03:44:51.0: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9261,14.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4261 14.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.61251426 21.01.2026 02:41:51.232 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
First image: 2461061.61251426 21.01.2026 02:41:51.232 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Last image: 2461244.92643844 23.07.2026 10:13:54.281 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6430
Objects passed selection criteria: 6422
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6026.75
Average stars matched: 5683.75 (94.3087 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115820 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 22 16:05:55 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-166-g55a66cb7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-22)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 23 09:01:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.61251426 21.01.2026 02:41:51.232 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
First image: 2461061.61251426 21.01.2026 02:41:51.232 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Last image: 2461244.92643844 23.07.2026 10:13:54.281 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 87
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32203
Objects passed selection criteria: 32149
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30757
Average stars matched: 29486 (95.8676 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 138888 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 22 16:05:55 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-166-g55a66cb7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-22)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 23 09:04:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461244.92576132
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits'
wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:08.246 +05:58:32.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:17.945 +05:59:32.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:08.246 +05:58:32.12
Second-epoch image center 00:00:17.945 +05:59:32.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0436 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:15.255 +05:58:53.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:08.246 +05:58:32.12
Second-epoch image center 00:00:15.255 +05:58:53.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0296 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:17.945 +05:59:32.82
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:15.255 +05:58:53.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01567 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b0uuxWQy8A
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VmBp7Hki4i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bwKLqBrwqM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits &> /tmp/tmp.668QrMna3x
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits and wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5657 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 359.9997 deg, Dec +0.6890 to +11.2632 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 359.9997 deg, Dec 0.6890 to 11.2632 deg
Loaded 178988 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3650 out of 3762 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3762 out of 5657 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.804350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.804350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.02
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.02
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5657 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 359.9997 deg, Dec +0.6890 to +11.2632 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 359.9997 deg, Dec 0.6890 to 11.2632 deg
Loaded 178988 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3650 out of 3762 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3762 out of 5657 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 5616 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0007 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +0.6971 to +11.2717 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0007 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 0.6971 to 11.2717 deg
Loaded 179019 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3652 out of 3766 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3766 out of 5616 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
2.1 pix Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.8 pix fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
2.8 pix fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
15.0 mag. Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.b0uuxWQy8A (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=353, bad_region=1, passed=5657
Got 5657 stars (including 5295 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5657 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0600 through 0 to 8.0260, gap 8.0260 to 352.0600
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0599 through 0 to 8.0264, gap 8.0264 to 352.0599
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=215 n_q2=272 n_q3=214 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.081
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits -region wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VmBp7Hki4i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=358, bad_region=0, passed=5616
Got 5616 stars (including 5250 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5616 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0601 through 0 to 8.0220, gap 8.0220 to 352.0601
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0600 through 0 to 8.0224, gap 8.0224 to 352.0600
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=214 n_q2=271 n_q3=219 n_q4=272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bwKLqBrwqM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=297, bad_region=0, passed=6503
Got 6503 stars (including 6197 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9825 through 0 to 8.3184, gap 8.3184 to 351.9825
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9820 through 0 to 8.3189, gap 8.3189 to 351.9820
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=262 n_q2=212 n_q3=270 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.668QrMna3x (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=294, bad_region=0, passed=6488
Got 6488 stars (including 6186 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9353 through 0 to 8.2369, gap 8.2369 to 351.9353
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6402 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9346 through 0 to 8.2374, gap 8.2374 to 351.9346
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=263 n_q2=210 n_q3=272 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits sigma_overall=0.286 worst_q_ratio=1.081
ref2=Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits sigma_overall=0.301 worst_q_ratio=1.188
new1=fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits sigma_overall=0.299 worst_q_ratio=1.179
new2=fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits sigma_overall=0.296 worst_q_ratio=1.123
reference average sigma_overall=0.2935 worst_q_ratio=1.1345
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_052405_TTUQ1b1x1_4150538_5HNG304Q/wcs_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits at 00:06:14.95 +06:21:13.9: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits at 00:17:45.85 +03:44:55.3: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits at 23:35:23.36 +03:44:45.1: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits at 00:04:34.43 +06:51:58.3: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-41-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits at 00:27:03.96 +01:46:37.4: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 00:17:45.85 +03:44:55.3: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:45.85 +03:44:55.3: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9053 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 00:04:34.43 +06:51:58.3: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:04:34.43 +06:51:58.3: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0674 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 00:06:14.95 +06:21:13.9: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:14.95 +06:21:13.9: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1007 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 00:27:03.96 +01:46:37.4: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-42-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 23:35:23.36 +03:44:45.1: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20327.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20411.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20327_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 20327_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20402_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20402_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20411_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 20411_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20412_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20412_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20416_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20416_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52323_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 52323_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52324_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 52324_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52325_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 52325_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52329_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 52329_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52330_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 52330_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52332_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 52332_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52334_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 52334_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52368_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 52368_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:27:03.96 +01:46:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52460_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 52460_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:35:23.37 +03:44:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52653_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 52653_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52658_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 52658_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52904_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 52904_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52912_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 52912_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52918_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 52918_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52925_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 52925_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52930_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 52930_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52934_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 52934_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52948_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 52948_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:14:54.15 +08:50:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52963_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 52963_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52991_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 52991_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52994_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 52994_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53008_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53008_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53012_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53012_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53015_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53015_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53017_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53017_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53018_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53018_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53031_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53031_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53033_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53033_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53036_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53036_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53037_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53037_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53038_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53038_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53049_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53049_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53060_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53060_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53062_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53062_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53066_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53066_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53069_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53069_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53077_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53077_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53081_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53081_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53090_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53090_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53104_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53104_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53113_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53113_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53119_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53119_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53121_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53121_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53133_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53133_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53138_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53138_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53140_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53140_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53141_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53141_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53146_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53146_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53149_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53149_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53151_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53151_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53152_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53152_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53154_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53154_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53160_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53160_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53162_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53162_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53169_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53169_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53171_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53171_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53173_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53173_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:31:42.62 +02:25:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53176_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53176_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53178_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53178_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53180_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53180_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53182_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53182_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53183_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53183_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53184_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53184_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53185_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53185_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53186_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53186_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53189_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53189_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53191_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53191_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53194_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53194_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53197_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53197_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53199_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53199_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53204_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53204_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53210_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53210_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53214_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53214_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53222_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53222_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53231_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53231_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53239_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53239_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53240_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53240_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53243_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53243_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53248_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53248_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53266_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53266_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53293_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 53293_fd_Psc-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-13-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks