NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Tau-06-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 23.41951    2461244.91951    13.13    04:29:48.88 +15:34:13.6   5140 4172   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.13    04:29:48.84 +15:34:14.0   5144 4171   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 23.4198  2461244.9198  13.13  04:29:48.86 +15:34:13.8
180.78729 -21.98155 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 3.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
59 Elpis                    0      1       1  13.3    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:48.86 +15:34:13.8:  16.39 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:48.86 +15:34:13.8:  16.27 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-06-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 23.41951    2461244.91951    14.05    03:56:13.14 +15:46:17.3   0239 4097   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.99    03:56:13.21 +15:46:16.5   0243 4095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 23.4198  2461244.9198  14.02  03:56:13.18 +15:46:16.9
174.77768 -27.96437 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 4.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
670 Ottegebe                -1     -0       1  14.5     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:13.18 +15:46:16.9:  16.06 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:13.18 +15:46:16.9:  15.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-06-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 2

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits
Field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Tau-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Tau-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Tau-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 724051 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 724051 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits_preview.png'
Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits

renamed 'Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits_preview.png'
Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 559.8035 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 711.9893 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1801.6193 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 637.7366 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1800.2964 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 638.6938 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.21831 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-23T05:03:55.5797471' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-23T10:03:55.5797471' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61244.4193932754 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-23T10:04:05.4834494' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61244.4195079049 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 66.6644682238174 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9997402219485 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 18.64 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 85.2397222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.10166131886847 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 26 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 61.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.71 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 24.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits :) Spent 0.830851 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-23T05:04:40.2427999' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-23T10:04:40.2427999' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61244.4199102083 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-23T10:04:50.1729842' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61244.4200251391 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 66.6644681577595 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9997402118293 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 18.7925 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 85.3377777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.07786492025739 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 26 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 61.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.71 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 24.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits :) Spent 0.833244 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits


fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461244.91950902 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Image size: 943.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:27:00.919 +13:59:04.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36 Second-epoch image center 04:27:00.919 +13:59:04.33 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0869 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Image size: 943.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:59.356 +13:59:12.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36 Second-epoch image center 04:26:59.356 +13:59:12.79 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0802 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:27:00.919 +13:59:04.33 Second-epoch second image center 04:26:59.356 +13:59:12.79 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00674 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ni77fJShPk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DQ67V0mgyu Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hgW6JXfKQ9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q7CQLbhOuE Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3910 to 74.9274 deg, Dec +8.6225 to +19.2877 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3910 to 74.9274 deg, Dec 8.6225 to 19.2877 deg Loaded 4388 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3407 out of 3668 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3668 out of 9344 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.989100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.989100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3910 to 74.9274 deg, Dec +8.6225 to +19.2877 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3910 to 74.9274 deg, Dec 8.6225 to 19.2877 deg Loaded 4388 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3407 out of 3668 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3668 out of 9344 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4336 to 74.9933 deg, Dec +8.6225 to +19.2874 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4336 to 74.9933 deg, Dec 8.6225 to 19.2874 deg Loaded 4405 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3648 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3648 out of 8488 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=5.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 2.7 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits 2.7 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 15.3 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 13.7 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits 13.8 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Ni77fJShPk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, bad_region=0, passed=9344 Got 9344 stars (including 8597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9113 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9114 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9114 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=245 n_q2=231 n_q3=268 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.DQ67V0mgyu (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=679, bad_region=1, passed=8488 Got 8488 stars (including 7793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8296 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8295 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8295 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=234 n_q2=241 n_q3=258 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.349 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.hgW6JXfKQ9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=242, bad_region=0, passed=4243 Got 4243 stars (including 3996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4243 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013101 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010481 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4197 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4199 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4199 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=238 n_q2=210 n_q3=247 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.386 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Q7CQLbhOuE (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=257, bad_region=0, passed=4249 Got 4249 stars (including 3991 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4249 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013100 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010480 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4209 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4208 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4208 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=239 n_q2=212 n_q3=243 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.177 ref2=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.349 new1=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.386 new2=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.227 reference average sigma_overall=0.3675 worst_q_ratio=1.263 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (949 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:38.74 +11:19:31.2: 11.35 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:38.74 +11:19:31.2: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.36 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:38.74 +11:19:31.2: ref_mag=11.36 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4906 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20179_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 20179_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 23.41951    2461244.91951    11.53    04:02:38.73 +11:19:30.9   1268 1425   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    11.46    04:02:38.75 +11:19:31.5   1272 1424   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20303_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 20303_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    11.42    04:54:18.52 +11:10:44.3   8927 1786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:54:18.53 +11:10:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02425_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 02425_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    10.63    04:02:45.78 +16:40:33.3   1191 4667   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:02:45.80 +16:40:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 06530_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 06530_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    11.48    04:43:24.07 +11:35:04.9   7286 1908   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:43:24.08 +11:35:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    10.35    04:25:27.22 +16:33:23.4   4482 4727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:25:27.22 +16:33:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Image size: 943.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:27:00.919 +13:59:04.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36 Second-epoch image center 04:27:00.919 +13:59:04.33 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0869 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Image size: 943.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:59.356 +13:59:12.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36 Second-epoch image center 04:26:59.356 +13:59:12.79 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0802 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:27:00.919 +13:59:04.33 Second-epoch second image center 04:26:59.356 +13:59:12.79 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00674 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l8CtO4r0hU Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IEwCEQJfhP Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w006WPRjnG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4KcMbAAmB8 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3910 to 74.9794 deg, Dec +8.6225 to +19.2877 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3910 to 74.9794 deg, Dec 8.6225 to 19.2877 deg Loaded 4414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3084 out of 3671 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3671 out of 62263 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.852850 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.852850 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3910 to 74.9794 deg, Dec +8.6225 to +19.2877 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3910 to 74.9794 deg, Dec 8.6225 to 19.2877 deg Loaded 4414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3084 out of 3671 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3671 out of 62263 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 58309 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4028 to 74.9974 deg, Dec +8.6073 to +19.2872 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4028 to 74.9974 deg, Dec 8.6073 to 19.2872 deg Loaded 4430 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3132 out of 3672 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 58309 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=4.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 53 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 1.8 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 2.5 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits 2.5 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits 1.9 pix wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 1.8 pix wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 15.5 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 14.1 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits 14.1 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.l8CtO4r0hU (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3506, bad_region=5, passed=62251 Got 62251 stars (including 58597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62251 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61240 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61239 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61239 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=238 n_q2=230 n_q3=272 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.IEwCEQJfhP (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3080, bad_region=5, passed=58299 Got 58299 stars (including 55093 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58299 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57429 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57431 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57432 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=231 n_q2=240 n_q3=264 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.w006WPRjnG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=686, bad_region=4, passed=24509 Got 24509 stars (including 23786 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24509 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013101 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010481 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24172 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24173 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24173 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=239 n_q2=204 n_q3=253 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.4KcMbAAmB8 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=704, bad_region=6, passed=24810 Got 24810 stars (including 24066 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24810 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013100 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010480 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24543 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24543 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24543 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=237 n_q2=205 n_q3=252 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.230 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:18:40.82 +17:59:05.4: 13.92 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:19:30.81 +11:59:00.5: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:18:40.82 +17:59:05.4: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:40.82 +17:59:05.4: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5918 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:19:30.81 +11:59:00.5: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:30.81 +11:59:00.5: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6425 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:22.81 +16:16:05.6: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:48.86 +15:34:13.8: 16.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:24:44.13 +12:54:47.9: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:35.54 +17:25:28.1: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:48.86 +15:34:13.8: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:22.81 +16:16:05.6: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:22.81 +16:16:05.6: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6660 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:12:44.75 +11:09:33.7: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:24:44.13 +12:54:47.9: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:44.13 +12:54:47.9: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2588 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:35.54 +17:25:28.1: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:35.54 +17:25:28.1: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2356 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:13.18 +15:46:16.9: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:12:44.75 +11:09:33.7: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:44.75 +11:09:33.7: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2985 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:33:52.87 +13:15:18.3: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:13.18 +15:46:16.9: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:33:52.87 +13:15:18.3: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:52.87 +13:15:18.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7387 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76137.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76412.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75631_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75631_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 23.41951    2461244.91951    13.52    04:18:40.77 +17:59:05.7   3460 5542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.72    04:18:40.86 +17:59:05.0   3464 5541   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75700_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75700_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    10.43    04:51:58.80 +11:07:36.3   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75723_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75723_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    11.08    04:22:54.21 +11:47:08.6   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75740_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75740_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    11.13    04:31:36.14 +11:29:23.8   5551 1735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75758_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75758_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    11.66    04:24:26.33 +18:29:15.2   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75764_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75764_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    11.59    04:31:42.05 +17:37:10.1   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75802_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75802_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    11.93    04:26:24.84 +15:35:08.1   4652 4151   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:26:24.83 +15:35:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75820_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75820_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    11.93    04:18:22.75 +10:04:05.5   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75823_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75823_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    11.58    04:49:13.19 +10:45:51.9   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75828_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75828_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    11.82    04:30:47.44 +09:02:27.1   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75830_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75830_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    12.30    04:26:07.19 +19:03:38.4   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75887_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75887_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    12.28    04:30:44.00 +13:42:58.2   5343 3065   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:30:44.00 +13:42:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75955_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75955_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    12.69    04:02:09.45 +11:30:54.5   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75957_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75957_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    12.90    04:10:47.88 +18:26:18.7   2319 5772   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:10:47.89 +18:26:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75968_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75968_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    12.33    04:56:12.01 +13:31:01.0   9088 3225   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:56:11.98 +13:31:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75970_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75970_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 23.41951    2461244.91951    12.63    04:19:30.85 +11:59:01.1   3754 1933   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    12.66    04:19:30.76 +11:58:59.9   3758 1932   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75982_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75982_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.07    04:00:43.24 +18:12:27.8   0864 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:00:43.18 +18:12:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75994_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 75994_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    12.33    04:59:08.02 +14:32:11.9   9470 3882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:59:08.00 +14:32:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76012_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76012_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.41    03:56:53.57 +18:17:28.2   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76027_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76027_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.11    03:59:24.41 +13:57:40.9   0745 3007   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 03:59:24.41 +13:57:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76037_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76037_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    12.48    04:51:49.95 +10:28:04.4   8593 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76063_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76063_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    12.64    04:33:58.41 +10:13:52.9   5948 0998   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:33:58.37 +10:13:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76093_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76093_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    12.62    04:57:05.89 +15:27:23.8   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76137_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 Preparing report for the candidate 76137_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76150_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76150_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.45    03:57:10.05 +09:14:37.9   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76163_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76163_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.19    04:21:59.60 +14:06:14.7   4058 3226   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:21:59.66 +14:06:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76187_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76187_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 23.41951    2461244.91951    13.65    03:56:22.83 +16:16:05.8   0256 4400   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.68    03:56:22.79 +16:16:05.4   0259 4398   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76218_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76218_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.46    04:20:49.84 +17:02:17.9   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76221_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76221_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 23.41951    2461244.91951    13.28    04:24:44.15 +12:54:47.9   4491 2533   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.25    04:24:44.12 +12:54:48.0   4495 2532   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76231_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76231_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 23.41951    2461244.91951    13.29    04:38:35.53 +17:25:27.7   6335 5373   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.20    04:38:35.56 +17:25:28.6   6339 5373   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76245_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76245_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 23.41951    2461244.91951    13.39    04:12:44.68 +11:09:33.4   2776 1387   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.24    04:12:44.81 +11:09:34.0   2780 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76259_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76259_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.22    04:30:13.74 +15:39:27.5   5201 4227   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:30:13.63 +15:39:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76266_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76266_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.36    04:20:47.05 +12:28:28.5   3930 2237   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76282_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76282_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.09    04:29:13.15 +16:49:44.9   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76296_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76296_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.37    04:30:08.22 +15:40:01.0   5187 4231   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:30:08.21 +15:40:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76306_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76306_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.44    04:20:48.64 +13:50:46.9   3894 3062   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:20:48.60 +13:50:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76412_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 Preparing report for the candidate 76412_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76414_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76414_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.68    04:00:37.99 +13:07:41.7   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76436_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76436_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    14.17    04:07:59.92 +13:47:00.2   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76439_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76439_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 23.41951    2461244.91951    13.74    04:33:52.86 +13:15:18.2   5815 2818   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.74    04:33:52.87 +13:15:18.3   5819 2817   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76453_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 76453_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    13.82    04:19:04.74 +10:42:03.5   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56370_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 56370_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    11.31    04:43:24.07 +11:35:05.4   7286 1908   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:43:24.08 +11:35:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    11.12    04:54:18.51 +11:10:44.7   8927 1786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:54:18.52 +11:10:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11686_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 11686_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    12.81    04:52:47.00 +17:16:28.9   8396 5453   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:52:46.94 +17:16:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36294_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 36294_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    12.86    04:55:05.70 +13:07:33.8   8944 2974   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:55:05.70 +13:07:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07803_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 07803_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    12.74    04:04:43.95 +17:59:23.5   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56491_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 56491_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    11.62    04:54:35.60 +11:33:27.1   8951 2019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:54:35.60 +11:33:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 47416_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 47416_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    9.60    04:28:18.01 +10:09:46.3   5111 0905   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:28:18.00 +10:09:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55715_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 55715_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    6.82    04:54:46.79 +11:25:33.8   8985 1942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:54:46.79 +11:25:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 39342_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 39342_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    6.69    04:50:36.65 +08:53:59.1   8488 0359   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:50:36.67 +08:53:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 47885_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 47885_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    6.71    04:54:53.74 +10:08:58.7   9069 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:54:53.73 +10:08:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32892_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 32892_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    6.77    04:56:21.85 +13:30:50.0   9113 3225   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:56:21.87 +13:30:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 28585_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 28585_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 23.42003    2461244.92003    6.83    04:52:31.66 +14:15:00.7   8508 3621   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_051407_TTUQ1b1x1_3792044_RxQV3Kzg/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_05-04-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 04:52:31.67 +14:15:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 13s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 04:29:48.86 +15:34:13.8 03:56:13.18 +15:46:16.9 ########### Completed Tau-06-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 04:29:48.86 +15:34:13.8 03:56:13.18 +15:46:16.9 ################################################################################### 04:29:48.86 +15:34:13.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 03:56:13.18 +15:46:16.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461244.91950902 -observatory V36 07:07:10.63 +18:21:20.0 Mercury (2.2mag) 11:04:21.95 +06:39:14.5 Venus (-4.2mag) 05:02:53.13 +22:45:54.4 Mars (1.3mag) 08:28:35.50 +19:32:24.6 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:45.39 +03:22:12.2 Saturn (0.7mag) 04:09:32.59 +20:51:13.7 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:47.91 +00:18:29.1 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:29:40.51 -23:23:43.1 Pluto (14.4mag) 15:10:13.19 -23:34:30.2 Moon (-10.9mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 23 07:15 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461244.91950902: 08:28:35.52 +19:32:24.0 Io (6.0mag) 08:28:27.33 +19:32:57.9 Europa (6.3mag) 08:28:39.84 +19:32:11.6 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:28:51.84 +19:31:24.6 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:26:34.55 +19:22:43.9 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:28:40.17 +19:32:06.6 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:25:57.12 +19:24:24.3 Elara (17.7mag) 08:32:28.55 +19:19:41.4 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:32:46.98 +19:39:34.0 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:35.01 +03:22:33.0 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:40.91 +03:22:20.5 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:56:15.55 +03:19:35.8 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:56:49.76 +03:21:31.6 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:28.62 +03:17:32.8 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 23 07:15 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461244.91950902: 18:10:09.94 -29:29:09.5 JWST 15:39:18.62 +50:17:52.6 Chandra 10:56:55.04 -59:30:04.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 23 07:15 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461244.91950902 -observatory V36 02:54:13.80 +15:53:30.8 17.8mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:08:51.73 -34:36:41.6 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:38:39.05 -68:24:22.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:05:11.10 +32:40:45.7 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 02:49:53.39 +27:06:15.6 16.0mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:50:55.31 +32:07:14.9 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:26:59.79 +26:47:01.1 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:07:06.20 +29:11:20.6 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:18:17.61 +05:11:51.5 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:11:00.79 -11:44:03.5 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:32:21.45 +67:16:42.5 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:07:48.90 -11:24:52.4 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:24:01.94 +66:27:24.0 18.0mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:49:28.18 +30:38:05.7 14.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:10:54.14 +15:34:06.2 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:24:03.86 +41:34:29.4 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:32:35.34 +47:46:35.9 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:01:41.41 -13:17:53.7 15.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:45:01.04 +26:52:43.9 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:22:48.19 -14:10:45.7 17.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:11:54.39 +21:49:06.8 17.5mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:49:45.35 +03:18:24.7 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:20:00.01 +78:57:44.3 17.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:58:25.09 +45:45:09.5 16.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:34:27.12 +06:37:15.4 17.1mag A/2026 E1 21:38:30.85 -20:19:04.8 7.0mag 10P/Tempel 11:19:59.54 -02:30:05.9 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:18:35.71 +30:55:31.4 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:35:15.15 +09:48:18.0 17.1mag 63P/Wild 00:52:48.28 -05:04:33.1 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 04:58:46.38 +20:40:08.0 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:42:00.38 +12:14:23.9 16.4mag 88P/Howell 07:13:27.72 +29:31:08.6 15.9mag 93P/Lovas 05:03:56.80 +31:17:50.5 16.6mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:40:33.20 +29:05:01.9 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:12:49.51 -04:04:49.4 16.9mag 124P/Mrkos 05:12:29.31 +21:05:56.6 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:00:32.80 +19:29:47.7 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 07:58:44.37 +14:03:31.1 17.1mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:21:35.46 -20:25:19.6 14.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:20:12.87 +36:17:52.7 15.5mag 162P/SidingSpring 18:14:23.86 +24:54:53.5 13.6mag 169P/NEAT 02:11:04.91 +08:49:15.6 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:36:05.58 -09:01:51.2 17.3mag 235P/LINEAR 20:34:17.78 -51:55:08.0 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:36:18.67 +18:10:14.0 15.5mag 260P/McNaught 06:17:08.72 +37:36:59.9 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:06:58.94 +04:48:56.9 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski 08:46:26.45 +19:07:11.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:12:03.01 +38:06:44.0 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.4K Jul 23 07:15 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 2026-07-16.17 17.02 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 23 07:15 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 23 07:15 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 15:40:49.500 +03:40:01.11 AT 2026tok 2026-07-09.29 19.19 13:28:58.224 -31:39:58.70 AT 2026toj 2026-01-27.63 20.99 16:19:43.736 +12:53:16.12 AT 2026toi 2026-06-19.41 20.78 12:16:00.811 +13:52:30.28 AT 2026toh 2026-06-05.33 21.31 08:05:33.164 +19:53:59.86 AT 2026tog 2026-05-05.27 21.02 22:22:27.296 -01:16:48.01 AT 2026tof 2026-06-20.59 21.53 18:21:21.782 +34:34:12.08 AT 2026toe 2026-06-06.57 20.8 09:23:56.056 +15:48:10.98 AT 2026tod 2026-03-09.25 20.93 14:30:53.211 +02:37:48.55 AT 2026toc 2026-02-24.60 21.68 18:53:53.654 +37:31:27.95 AT 2026tob 2026-06-06.57 20.33 14:02:45.983 +27:31:29.38 AT 2026toa 2026-01-13.59 21.55 11:45:46.289 -15:58:14.20 AT 2026tnz 2026-04-19.34 21.32 17:01:06.389 +36:02:56.61 AT 2026tny 2026-06-22.29 20.16 14:21:15.460 +00:01:06.82 AT 2026tnx 2026-05-17.42 21.17 16:56:29.803 +29:23:52.18 AT 2026tnw 2026-06-06.48 20.57 13:19:42.648 +33:06:54.64 AT 2026tnv 2026-05-13.26 20.86 11:42:50.112 -20:30:52.08 AT 2026tnu 2026-02-14.47 20.76 21:12:00.798 -45:40:32.46 AT 2026tnt 2026-06-19.54 20.97 08:38:13.357 -04:40:15.41 AT 2026tns 2026-02-24.31 20.85 01:14:19.100 +10:26:27.44 AT 2026tnr 2026-06-21.59 20.53 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 23 07:15 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C