This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4017 2461244.9017 11.88 05:02:56.61 +31:12:03.5
172.92870 -6.36414 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra -0 0 1 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:02:56.61 +31:12:03.5: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:02:56.61 +31:12:03.5: 16.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9017,11.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4017 11.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.4017 2461244.9017 13.72 04:54:51.41 +30:33:30.0
172.37141 -8.12987 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.172 Baucis -0 0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:54:51.41 +30:33:30.0: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:54:51.41 +30:33:30.0: 16.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.9017,13.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.4017 13.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461244.90209810 23.07.2026 09:38:51.276 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 52 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15212
Objects passed selection criteria: 15123
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10808.8
Average stars matched: 10504.5 (97.1852 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 123500 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 22 16:05:55 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-166-g55a66cb7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-22)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 23 05:04:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461244.90209810 23.07.2026 09:38:51.276 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 106
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 103 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 116841
Objects passed selection criteria: 116590
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 85371
Average stars matched: 82003.2 (96.0552 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1951912 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 22 16:05:55 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-166-g55a66cb7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-22)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 23 05:11:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461244.90138182
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.017 +29:59:40.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:19.153 +29:59:49.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.017 +29:59:40.48
Second-epoch image center 05:00:19.153 +29:59:49.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0655 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:16.912 +29:59:40.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.017 +29:59:40.48
Second-epoch image center 05:00:16.912 +29:59:40.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0574 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:19.153 +29:59:49.32
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:16.912 +29:59:40.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00846 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DLzWa6FuvM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NMP5whgdSO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZaZxj0Cd5z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mhbpQkpGkw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5643 to 84.6645 deg, Dec +24.3655 to +35.2867 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5643 to 84.6645 deg, Dec 24.3655 to 35.2867 deg
Loaded 8424 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6043 out of 6742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6742 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5643 to 84.6645 deg, Dec +24.3655 to +35.2867 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5643 to 84.6645 deg, Dec 24.3655 to 35.2867 deg
Loaded 8424 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6043 out of 6742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6742 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5645 to 84.6680 deg, Dec +24.3653 to +35.2868 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5645 to 84.6680 deg, Dec 24.3653 to 35.2868 deg
Loaded 8428 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6047 out of 6745 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6745 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DLzWa6FuvM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=360 n_q2=220 n_q3=212 n_q4=162 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.070
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NMP5whgdSO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=362 n_q2=224 n_q3=203 n_q4=165 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZaZxj0Cd5z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=210, bad_region=1, passed=5403
Got 5403 stars (including 5185 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5403 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5188 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.480 n_q1=167 n_q2=149 n_q3=248 n_q4=383 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.282
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mhbpQkpGkw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=222, bad_region=0, passed=5497
Got 5497 stars (including 5265 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5497 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5281 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5281 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5281 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=164 n_q2=148 n_q3=249 n_q4=384 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.070
ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.374 worst_q_ratio=1.168
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits sigma_overall=0.460 worst_q_ratio=1.282
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits sigma_overall=0.465 worst_q_ratio=1.307
reference average sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.119
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351_astrometric_residuals.png (945 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21124_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 21124_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:11.40 +35:13:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21180_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 21180_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.48 +31:18:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12406_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 12406_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.47 +28:30:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06441_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 06441_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:03.38 +32:09:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.49 +34:08:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04242_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 04242_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:35.33 +32:47:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.32 +28:36:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.017 +29:59:40.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:19.153 +29:59:49.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.017 +29:59:40.48
Second-epoch image center 05:00:19.153 +29:59:49.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0655 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:16.912 +29:59:40.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.017 +29:59:40.48
Second-epoch image center 05:00:16.912 +29:59:40.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0574 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:19.153 +29:59:49.32
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:16.912 +29:59:40.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00846 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.od1gG1jcD8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HyG1Gxc9o1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yOSYKtYN1Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VjREXlVXgz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5568 to 84.6878 deg, Dec +24.3237 to +35.3004 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5568 to 84.6878 deg, Dec 24.3237 to 35.3004 deg
Loaded 8482 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4945 out of 6875 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6875 out of 129003 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5568 to 84.6878 deg, Dec +24.3237 to +35.3004 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5568 to 84.6878 deg, Dec 24.3237 to 35.3004 deg
Loaded 8482 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4945 out of 6875 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6875 out of 129003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5645 to 84.6893 deg, Dec +24.3196 to +35.2959 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5645 to 84.6893 deg, Dec 24.3196 to 35.2959 deg
Loaded 8478 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4939 out of 6881 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6881 out of 129055 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 98 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
1.8 pix wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.od1gG1jcD8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=9, passed=128967
Got 128967 stars (including 114713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 125973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 125971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 125971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=358 n_q2=221 n_q3=209 n_q4=163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HyG1Gxc9o1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=12, passed=129020
Got 129020 stars (including 114961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 126156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 126161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 126159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=353 n_q2=224 n_q3=210 n_q4=164 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yOSYKtYN1Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1784, bad_region=5, passed=42953
Got 42953 stars (including 41090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42953 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41491 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=171 n_q2=144 n_q3=265 n_q4=366 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.385
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VjREXlVXgz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1899, bad_region=6, passed=43149
Got 43149 stars (including 41159 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43149 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=170 n_q2=144 n_q3=266 n_q4=367 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.487
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-37-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_045808_TTUQ1b1x1_2481444_dvBeo51Z/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:12:37.76 +31:48:43.3: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:16.15 +32:38:14.1: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:58:30.54 +31:32:10.9: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:03.56 +31:46:10.3: 14.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:03.56 +31:46:10.3: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:16.15 +32:38:14.1: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:58:30.54 +31:32:10.9: 14.29 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:03.56 +31:46:10.3: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5693 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:12:37.76 +31:48:43.3: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:30.54 +31:32:10.9: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6838 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:16.15 +32:38:14.1: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1325 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:37.76 +31:48:43.3: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1780 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:02:56.61 +31:12:03.5: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:02:56.61 +31:12:03.5: 16.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:12:08.10 +32:54:33.9: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:01:54.36 +28:18:13.7: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:01:48.00 +32:14:39.0: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:49.85 +29:58:34.3: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:01:48.00 +32:14:39.0: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:12:08.10 +32:54:33.9: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:48.00 +32:14:39.0: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3175 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:01:54.36 +28:18:13.7: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:08.10 +32:54:33.9: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1409 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:54.36 +28:18:13.7: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1820 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:54:51.41 +30:33:30.0: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:49.85 +29:58:34.3: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:49.85 +29:58:34.3: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3622 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:54:51.41 +30:33:30.0: 16.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151290.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out152060.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151103_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151103_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151108_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151108_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151109_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151109_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151131_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151131_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:04.23 +32:55:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151141_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151141_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:43.15 +33:27:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151143_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151143_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:38.72 +33:39:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151153_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151153_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:11.40 +35:13:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151190_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151190_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151197_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151197_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151217_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151217_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151218_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151218_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151249_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151249_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:57.82 +33:05:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151272_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151272_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151276_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151276_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:14.11 +28:37:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.44 +34:26:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151290_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
Preparing report for the candidate 151290_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.70 +34:09:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151325_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151325_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:18.08 +33:47:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151336_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151336_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.09 +34:07:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151349_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151349_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:56.85 +33:06:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151350_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151350_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.33 +34:07:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151362_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151362_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.51 +34:49:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151381_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151381_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:29.74 +32:42:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151394_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151394_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:25.07 +30:30:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151402_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151402_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:35.96 +34:06:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151427_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151427_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.79 +26:54:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151429_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151429_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151434_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151434_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151438_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151438_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:33.66 +33:00:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151442_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151442_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.97 +28:31:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151459_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151459_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:18.59 +34:10:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151460_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151460_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:46.44 +31:23:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151468_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151468_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.67 +34:23:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151469_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151469_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.19 +28:37:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151474_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151474_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:35.32 +34:07:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151510_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151510_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:01.84 +26:45:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151535_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151535_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.61 +32:33:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151569_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151569_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.63 +33:11:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:41.61 +34:15:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151595_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151595_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.84 +26:25:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151596_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151596_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.89 +26:10:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151601_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151601_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:26.46 +34:06:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151641_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151641_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:13.48 +28:37:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151649_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151649_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:00.69 +32:53:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151675_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151675_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.85 +29:47:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151717_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151717_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.29 +31:44:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151737_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151737_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:45.70 +28:00:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151750_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151750_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151788_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151788_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151790_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151790_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.74 +29:45:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151804_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151804_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151821_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151821_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151853_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151853_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:35.90 +31:24:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151855_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151855_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:36.41 +30:33:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:39.87 +33:20:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151900_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151900_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151929_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151929_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151972_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 151972_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.90 +33:11:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152014_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 152014_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.12 +31:04:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152030_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 152030_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152044_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 152044_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:38.16 +31:15:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152060_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
Preparing report for the candidate 152060_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.16 +32:10:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:08.28 +27:03:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.54 +31:18:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 80722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:33.78 +29:20:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:50.29 +29:42:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 128113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.47 +28:30:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 16878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.96 +33:57:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:35.83 +29:00:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 66229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:56.15 +30:38:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93940_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 93940_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:35.12 +25:01:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.46 +28:42:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:08.96 +25:22:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.42 +26:08:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 113795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:57.01 +27:27:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 44278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:03.40 +32:09:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14221_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 14221_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:04.36 +34:10:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.32 +25:24:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:38.52 +28:39:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 50196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:02.10 +31:50:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29397_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 29397_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:35.35 +32:47:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:47.27 +26:45:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101981_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 101981_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:53.69 +27:26:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:49.57 +34:37:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.47 +34:08:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 41372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:11.24 +32:26:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 140767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:55.63 +30:10:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:16.51 +27:22:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:52.89 +30:33:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115016_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 115016_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:12.25 +25:58:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 33758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:52.80 +32:28:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 97203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:16.27 +25:08:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.31 +28:36:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_04-38-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks