This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.2306 2461244.7306 11.20 20:30:06.75 -23:30:42.3
20.70752 -31.50173 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.4 pix This object is listed in planets.txt 547.2" Pluto (14.4mag)The object was found in VSX 1" AY Cap
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.100 V 13.200 V 2452173.20000 194.000000000000
The object was found in astcheck.134340 Pluto 365 -419 556 14.9 0 -0
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the predicted asteroid brightness, but the matched variable star above likely accounts for this object.
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.2306* 20 30 06.75 -23 30 42.3 11.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AY Cap,2461244.7306,11.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AY Cap 20260723.2306 11.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.2306 2461244.7306 13.03 19:53:34.42 -25:29:22.0
15.51833 -24.29140 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.66 Maja 1 0 1 13.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:53:34.42 -25:29:22.0: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:53:34.42 -25:29:22.0: 15.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.7306,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.2306 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.2306 2461244.7306 13.65 20:06:56.40 -21:07:10.3
21.21473 -25.65053 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1105 Fragaria 1 1 1 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:06:56.40 -21:07:10.3: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:06:56.40 -21:07:10.3: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.7306,13.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.2306 13.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 23.2306 2461244.7306 13.46 20:18:59.85 -27:09:22.4
15.77154 -30.22198 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.267 Tirza 1 1 2 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:18:59.85 -27:09:22.4: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:18:59.85 -27:09:22.4: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 23.2306* 20 18 59.85 -27 09 22.4 13.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461244.7306,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260723.2306 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461244.73189888 23.07.2026 05:33:46.063 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7152
Objects passed selection criteria: 7148
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6665
Average stars matched: 6521 (97.8395 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115988 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 22 16:05:55 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-166-g55a66cb7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-22)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 23 02:18:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461244.73189888 23.07.2026 05:33:46.063 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 92
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 40 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 56087
Objects passed selection criteria: 55988
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 51027.2
Average stars matched: 49323 (96.6601 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 161852 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 22 16:05:55 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-166-g55a66cb7
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-22)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 23 02:22:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461244.72938954
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:27.037 -26:00:29.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:27.037 -26:00:29.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0464 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:29.925 -26:01:04.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:29.925 -26:01:04.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0405 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:27.037 -26:00:29.03
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:29.925 -26:01:04.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01469 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PRlEI7rAsj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5wqxLkxUzU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xOeQuIwBRD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CimVaz6ARC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.601900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.601900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6769 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4446 deg, Dec -31.2472 to -20.5564 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4446 deg, Dec -31.2472 to -20.5564 deg
Loaded 9425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5485 out of 5600 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5600 out of 6769 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
3.7 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.2 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PRlEI7rAsj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=461, bad_region=0, passed=7487
Got 7487 stars (including 7021 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.715 n_q1=238 n_q2=214 n_q3=259 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.314
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5wqxLkxUzU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=427, bad_region=0, passed=6769
Got 6769 stars (including 6336 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6769 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=227 n_q2=222 n_q3=251 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.110
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xOeQuIwBRD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=257, bad_region=0, passed=6362
Got 6362 stars (including 6104 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6362 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.243 n_q1=252 n_q2=200 n_q3=274 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CimVaz6ARC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=375, bad_region=0, passed=6180
Got 6180 stars (including 5798 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6180 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=260 n_q2=198 n_q3=270 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.035
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits sigma_overall=0.544 worst_q_ratio=1.314
ref2=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits sigma_overall=0.472 worst_q_ratio=1.110
new1=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.260
new2=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.035
reference average sigma_overall=0.508 worst_q_ratio=1.212
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:03:34.22 -25:27:15.9: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:00.26 -21:49:21.3: 11.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:51:24.40 -20:42:11.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:45:43.01 -25:15:56.7: 11.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:49:54.49 -28:50:18.0: 11.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:45:29.30 -24:51:34.3: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:30:50.63 -31:07:52.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:43:00.26 -21:49:21.3: 11.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:51:24.40 -20:42:11.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:24.40 -20:42:11.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:00.26 -21:49:21.3: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4457 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:00:11.15 -24:17:54.6: 11.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:03:34.22 -25:27:15.9: 11.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:49:54.49 -28:50:18.0: 11.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:34.22 -25:27:15.9: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3661 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:54.49 -28:50:18.0: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4141 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:45:29.30 -24:51:34.3: 11.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:45:43.01 -25:15:56.7: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:29.30 -24:51:34.3: ref_mag=11.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4534 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:30:50.63 -31:07:52.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:50.63 -31:07:52.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:43.01 -25:15:56.7: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4445 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:39:25.48 -22:02:42.9: 11.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:00:11.15 -24:17:54.6: 11.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:11.15 -24:17:54.6: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5082 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:39:25.48 -22:02:42.9: 11.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:25.48 -22:02:42.9: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5259 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:03:51.88 -25:29:40.5: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:03:51.88 -25:29:40.5: 11.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:51.88 -25:29:40.5: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5338 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20212_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20212_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:04.32 -28:31:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20289_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20289_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20313_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20313_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:58.05 -22:58:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20323_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 20323_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20360_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20360_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20368_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20368_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20377_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20377_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20378_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20378_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20382_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20382_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20388_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20388_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20401_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20401_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20406_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20406_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20415_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20415_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:27.037 -26:00:29.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:27.037 -26:00:29.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0464 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:29.925 -26:01:04.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:29.925 -26:01:04.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0405 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:27.037 -26:00:29.03
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:29.925 -26:01:04.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01469 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DjKoXIhcDv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mFormeNlKC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rkxPWd0F0G
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TvLwOEowZm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 59775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Loaded 9495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7512 out of 8123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8123 out of 59775 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.442600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.442600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 59775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Loaded 9495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7512 out of 8123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8123 out of 59775 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 55659 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3218 to 311.4446 deg, Dec -31.2543 to -20.5313 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3218 to 311.4446 deg, Dec -31.2543 to -20.5313 deg
Loaded 9473 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7582 out of 8132 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8132 out of 55659 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 78 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
3.4 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DjKoXIhcDv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2722, bad_region=2, passed=59768
Got 59768 stars (including 56968 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.690 n_q1=249 n_q2=208 n_q3=247 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mFormeNlKC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2376, bad_region=0, passed=55644
Got 55644 stars (including 53197 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=233 n_q2=221 n_q3=233 n_q4=285 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rkxPWd0F0G (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1480, bad_region=1, passed=38533
Got 38533 stars (including 37019 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38533 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=231 n_q2=194 n_q3=287 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.374
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TvLwOEowZm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1749, bad_region=2, passed=51602
Got 51602 stars (including 49777 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=253 n_q2=201 n_q3=273 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-30-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-23_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_003432_TTUQ1b1x1_3204162_EodGyZIv/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:27:31.10 -29:27:36.5: 12.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:09:45.77 -21:53:27.3: 13.85 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:57:42.94 -23:30:46.4: 13.66 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:58:21.47 -22:33:45.1: 13.87 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:30.18 -23:55:38.4: 12.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:30:50.63 -31:07:52.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:40:29.42 -21:32:07.9: 12.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:00:08.48 -20:55:20.3: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:51:26.37 -23:35:29.1: 13.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:27:31.10 -29:27:36.5: 12.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:58:21.47 -22:33:45.1: 13.80 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:30:50.63 -31:07:52.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:50.63 -31:07:52.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:00:08.48 -20:55:20.3: 12.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:40:29.42 -21:32:07.9: 12.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:41:30.18 -23:55:38.4: 12.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:09:45.77 -21:53:27.3: 13.82 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:57:42.94 -23:30:46.4: 13.64 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:31.10 -29:27:36.5: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4225 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:21.47 -22:33:45.1: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7095 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:29.42 -21:32:07.9: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7904 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:30.18 -23:55:38.4: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0578 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:08.48 -20:55:20.3: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5212 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:45.77 -21:53:27.3: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8179 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:42.94 -23:30:46.4: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5341 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:51:26.37 -23:35:29.1: 13.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:26.37 -23:35:29.1: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2589 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:39.09 -21:56:14.3: 12.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:47:08.54 -23:43:16.4: 12.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:45:41.72 -23:01:16.9: 12.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:36:46.63 -25:37:51.6: 12.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:50:21.94 -23:36:05.7: 12.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:53:34.42 -25:29:22.0: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:43:39.09 -21:56:14.3: 12.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:19.17 -29:52:41.7: 13.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:07.20 -29:47:49.7: 13.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:39:40.23 -21:09:45.5: 13.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:39.09 -21:56:14.3: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3372 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:45.41 -30:01:42.9: 13.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:47:08.54 -23:43:16.4: 12.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:45:41.72 -23:01:16.9: 12.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:41.72 -23:01:16.9: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8624 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:36:46.63 -25:37:51.6: 12.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:08.54 -23:43:16.4: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6409 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:46.63 -25:37:51.6: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8046 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:53:34.42 -25:29:22.0: 15.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:50:21.94 -23:36:05.7: 12.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:21.94 -23:36:05.7: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8725 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:41:19.17 -29:52:41.7: 13.47 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:43:07.20 -29:47:49.7: 13.12 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:19.17 -29:52:41.7: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.0706 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:07.20 -29:47:49.7: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.0467 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:39:40.23 -21:09:45.5: 13.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:40.23 -21:09:45.5: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1829 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:42:45.41 -30:01:42.9: 13.01 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:45.41 -30:01:42.9: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.8928 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:30.31 -22:47:07.1: 13.72 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:43.07 -27:51:06.2: 13.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:37:10.78 -30:55:27.9: 13.33 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:20.45 -22:51:00.7: 13.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:01.45 -20:36:41.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:06:56.40 -21:07:10.3: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:56.64 -27:37:56.1: 13.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:43:30.31 -22:47:07.1: 14.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:30.31 -22:47:07.1: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4544 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:04.93 -21:02:59.0: 13.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:23:41.10 -24:22:05.2: 13.76 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:41:43.07 -27:51:06.2: 13.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:37:10.78 -30:55:27.9: 13.13 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:43.07 -27:51:06.2: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3372 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:10.78 -30:55:27.9: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.1598 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:41:20.45 -22:51:00.7: 13.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:20.45 -22:51:00.7: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5807 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:38:01.45 -20:36:41.4: 13.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:01.45 -20:36:41.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:06:56.40 -21:07:10.3: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:39:56.64 -27:37:56.1: 13.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:56.64 -27:37:56.1: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4748 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:38:04.93 -21:02:59.0: 13.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:23:41.10 -24:22:05.2: 13.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:04.93 -21:02:59.0: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5179 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:41.10 -24:22:05.2: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5656 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:15.63 -30:29:19.7: 13.30 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:31.77 -21:13:14.5: 14.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:34:26.75 -30:11:25.9: 13.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:41.86 -21:42:28.6: 13.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:28.99 -27:15:14.3: 13.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:40:15.63 -30:29:19.7: 12.95 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:34.91 -22:20:42.1: 13.76 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:40.85 -21:17:56.4: 14.16 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:15.63 -30:29:19.7: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0611 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:28.38 -27:49:56.5: 13.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:34:26.75 -30:11:25.9: 13.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:39:31.77 -21:13:14.5: 13.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:26.75 -30:11:25.9: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4362 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:38:41.86 -21:42:28.6: 14.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:31.77 -21:13:14.5: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6100 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:41.86 -21:42:28.6: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6552 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:43:28.99 -27:15:14.3: 13.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:28.99 -27:15:14.3: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3886 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:42:28.38 -27:49:56.5: 13.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:41:34.91 -22:20:42.1: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:28.38 -27:49:56.5: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4844 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:42:40.85 -21:17:56.4: 14.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:34.91 -22:20:42.1: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6379 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:40.85 -21:17:56.4: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7418 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:25.70 -25:55:04.5: 13.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:18:59.85 -27:09:22.4: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:42.89 -25:05:13.3: 13.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:37:37.83 -21:11:08.7: 13.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:12:24.23 -31:01:29.1: 13.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:42:25.70 -25:55:04.5: 13.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:25.70 -25:55:04.5: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5762 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:27.65 -22:55:48.8: 13.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:10.96 -24:11:39.9: 14.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:18:59.85 -27:09:22.4: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:42:42.89 -25:05:13.3: 13.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:42.89 -25:05:13.3: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5360 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:37:37.83 -21:11:08.7: 14.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:37.83 -21:11:08.7: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6064 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:12:24.23 -31:01:29.1: 14.22 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:24.23 -31:01:29.1: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3241 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:00.13 -22:19:00.6: 13.87 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:42:27.65 -22:55:48.8: 13.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:43:10.96 -24:11:39.9: 14.10 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:27.65 -22:55:48.8: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7216 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:10.96 -24:11:39.9: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6584 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:41:00.13 -22:19:00.6: 13.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:00.13 -22:19:00.6: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6329 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:53.02 -21:34:37.3: 13.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:14.14 -21:31:20.1: 13.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:25.91 -22:55:23.1: 14.30 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:17.81 -21:57:16.0: 13.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:41:53.02 -21:34:37.3: 13.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:53.02 -21:34:37.3: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7911 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:12.33 -21:15:53.4: 13.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:08:26.20 -22:12:19.7: 14.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:38:14.14 -21:31:20.1: 14.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:14.14 -21:31:20.1: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5302 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:41:25.91 -22:55:23.1: 14.13 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:25.91 -22:55:23.1: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8666 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:42:17.81 -21:57:16.0: 13.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:17.81 -21:57:16.0: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7724 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:21.68 -22:09:34.7: 14.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:08:26.20 -22:12:19.7: 14.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:41:12.33 -21:15:53.4: 14.10 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:26.20 -22:12:19.7: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7564 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:12.33 -21:15:53.4: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7927 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:42.64 -21:47:00.3: 14.31 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:42:21.68 -22:09:34.7: 14.06 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:21.68 -22:09:34.7: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8988 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:13:52.02 -23:11:46.4: 14.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:53.84 -24:47:54.1: 13.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:46:38.29 -20:50:27.0: 13.75 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:39:42.64 -21:47:00.3: 13.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:42.64 -21:47:00.3: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9726 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:55:31.77 -22:41:29.0: 14.11 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:56:39.85 -21:05:19.3: 14.45 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:13:52.02 -23:11:46.4: 14.26 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:52.02 -23:11:46.4: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9061 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:39:53.84 -24:47:54.1: 13.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:53.84 -24:47:54.1: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8408 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:46:38.29 -20:50:27.0: 14.00 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:38.29 -20:50:27.0: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9010 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:25.92 -24:07:05.2: 14.32 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:56:39.85 -21:05:19.3: 14.22 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:39.85 -21:05:19.3: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9268 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:55:31.77 -22:41:29.0: 14.65 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:31.77 -22:41:29.0: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0926 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:34:49.30 -26:47:15.1: 14.13 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:32:11.39 -23:47:17.1: 13.90 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:43:25.92 -24:07:05.2: 14.74 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:25.92 -24:07:05.2: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.0672 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:19.12 -30:05:25.1: 12.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:34:49.30 -26:47:15.1: 13.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:32:11.39 -23:47:17.1: 13.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:49.30 -26:47:15.1: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8977 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:11.39 -23:47:17.1: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9640 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:43:19.12 -30:05:25.1: 12.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:19.12 -30:05:25.1: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.7358 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:03.82 -30:31:26.9: 12.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:43:03.82 -30:31:26.9: 12.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:03.82 -30:31:26.9: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8266 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74294.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74561.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74643.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73343_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 73343_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73344_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 73344_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73347_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 73347_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73359_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 73359_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73369_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 73369_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73370_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 73370_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73372_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 73372_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73377_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 73377_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73501_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 73501_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73518_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 73518_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:58.06 -22:58:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73643_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 73643_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:01.49 -23:10:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73697_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 73697_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:55.28 -23:25:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73837_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 73837_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73874_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 73874_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:37:22.58 -30:10:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73962_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 73962_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74012_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74012_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:29.11 -30:48:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74119_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74119_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74140_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74140_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74143_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74143_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:38.10 -27:10:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74156_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74156_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:25.81 -21:31:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74182_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74182_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74294_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 74294_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74295_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74295_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74335_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74335_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74428_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74428_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74446_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74446_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74460_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74460_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74496_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74496_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74539_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74539_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74540_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74540_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74550_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74550_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74556_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74556_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74561_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 74561_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74569_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74569_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74570_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74570_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74579_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74579_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74588_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74588_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74591_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74591_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74598_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74598_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74603_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74603_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74609_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74609_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74617_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74617_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74631_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74631_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74633_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74633_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74637_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74637_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74643_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 74643_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74655_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74655_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74656_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74656_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74666_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74666_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74669_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74669_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74681_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74681_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74682_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74682_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74685_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74685_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74696_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74696_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74727_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74727_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74743_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74743_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74747_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74747_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74753_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74753_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74757_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74757_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74763_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74763_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74765_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74765_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74782_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74782_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74784_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74784_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74794_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74794_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74813_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74813_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74822_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74822_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74829_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74829_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74830_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 74830_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03323_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 03323_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71065_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 71065_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:17.05 -27:05:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14951_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 14951_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:57.78 -27:55:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70080_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 70080_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:09.01 -28:46:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69974_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 69974_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:44.28 -29:54:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01649_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 01649_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18227_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 18227_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:40.40 -27:15:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11495_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 11495_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:04.32 -28:31:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50115_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 50115_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:31.19 -22:06:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21222_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 21222_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_00-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks