This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9152,7.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4152 7.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9152,8.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4152 8.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.4152 2461243.9152 10.24 00:26:09.24 +01:36:21.2
109.96541 -60.62775 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.192 Nausikaa -0 0 0 10.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:26:09.24 +01:36:21.2: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:26:09.24 +01:36:21.2: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9152,10.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4152 10.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9152,10.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4152 10.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9152,7.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4152 7.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9152,8.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4152 8.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.4152 2461243.9152 13.82 01:13:47.29 +03:27:15.3
133.79168 -58.94543 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.191 Kolga -1 -0 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:13:47.29 +03:27:15.3: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:13:47.29 +03:27:15.3: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9152,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4152 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.4152 2461243.9152 13.94 01:15:35.87 +06:04:06.7
133.79972 -56.29257 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.58 Concordia -1 0 1 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:15:35.87 +06:04:06.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:15:35.87 +06:04:06.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9152,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4152 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.4152 2461243.9152 14.24 00:44:31.47 +09:12:35.5
120.05457 -53.62326 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.524 Fidelio -1 -0 1 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:44:31.47 +09:12:35.5: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:44:31.47 +09:12:35.5: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9152,14.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4152 14.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.4152 2461243.9152 14.48 00:41:55.12 +07:16:56.0
118.76041 -55.51241 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.577 Rhea -2 0 2 14.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:41:55.12 +07:16:56.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:41:55.12 +07:16:56.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9152,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4152 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.9152,10.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.4152 10.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
First image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Last image: 2461243.91568994 22.07.2026 09:58:25.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6283
Objects passed selection criteria: 6282
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5992.75
Average stars matched: 5841.75 (97.4803 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115320 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 22 08:55:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
First image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Last image: 2461243.91568994 22.07.2026 09:58:25.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 43
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33851
Objects passed selection criteria: 33774
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 32110.5
Average stars matched: 31028.5 (96.6304 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 140156 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 22 08:57:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461243.91471784
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:28.244 +06:00:21.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:28.244 +06:00:21.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0194 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:31.422 +06:00:51.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:31.422 +06:00:51.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0182 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:28.244 +06:00:21.10
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:31.422 +06:00:51.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01557 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p9JpjK1KrD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DAfaygL68B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits &> /tmp/tmp.29dRyrhcrC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Mo2GGYBQ2m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6274 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec +0.7095 to +11.2754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec 0.7095 to 11.2754 deg
Loaded 4466 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3642 out of 3799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3799 out of 6274 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.877250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.877250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6274 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec +0.7095 to +11.2754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec 0.7095 to 11.2754 deg
Loaded 4466 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3642 out of 3799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3799 out of 6274 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 6217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8906 to 20.8646 deg, Dec +0.7094 to +11.2737 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8906 to 20.8646 deg, Dec 0.7094 to 11.2737 deg
Loaded 4467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3635 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6217 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
2.0 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
2.4 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
2.4 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.p9JpjK1KrD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=428, bad_region=0, passed=6274
Got 6274 stars (including 5838 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6274 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=207 n_q2=265 n_q3=258 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DAfaygL68B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=435, bad_region=0, passed=6217
Got 6217 stars (including 5773 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=208 n_q2=264 n_q3=255 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.411
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.29dRyrhcrC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=300, bad_region=0, passed=5794
Got 5794 stars (including 5491 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5794 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=253 n_q2=255 n_q3=255 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.013
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Mo2GGYBQ2m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=313, bad_region=0, passed=5820
Got 5820 stars (including 5498 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5820 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=250 n_q2=254 n_q3=259 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.411
new1=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits sigma_overall=0.295 worst_q_ratio=1.013
new2=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.079
reference average sigma_overall=0.29 worst_q_ratio=1.323
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070_astrometric_residuals.png (980 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384_astrometric_residuals.png (981 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385_astrometric_residuals.png (980 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:26:09.24 +01:36:21.2: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:45:11.59 +06:28:53.9: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:26:09.24 +01:36:21.2: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:45:11.59 +06:28:53.9: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:45:11.59 +06:28:53.9: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1630 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20346.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20320_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 20320_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20325_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 20325_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20346_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 20346_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20355_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 20355_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20452_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 20452_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 01357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:34.14 +08:55:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:26:09.24 +01:36:21.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:28.244 +06:00:21.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:28.244 +06:00:21.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0194 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:31.422 +06:00:51.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:31.422 +06:00:51.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0182 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:28.244 +06:00:21.10
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:31.422 +06:00:51.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01557 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2LvtQSqPDO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6jC3QPeqaV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ro1NFrTjMb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y5tL11DtDF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34129 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec +0.7073 to +11.2841 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec 0.7073 to 11.2841 deg
Loaded 4478 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3588 out of 3910 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3910 out of 34129 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34129 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec +0.7073 to +11.2841 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec 0.7073 to 11.2841 deg
Loaded 4478 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3588 out of 3910 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3910 out of 34129 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 34111 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8822 to 20.8645 deg, Dec +0.7037 to +11.2806 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8822 to 20.8645 deg, Dec 0.7037 to 11.2806 deg
Loaded 4474 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3580 out of 3908 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3908 out of 34111 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 41 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
1.9 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
15.4 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.2LvtQSqPDO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1306, bad_region=1, passed=34109
Got 34109 stars (including 32754 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34109 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=210 n_q2=257 n_q3=258 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.325
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6jC3QPeqaV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=1297, bad_region=1, passed=34085
Got 34085 stars (including 32720 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34085 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33453 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.253 n_q1=213 n_q2=257 n_q3=253 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.366
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ro1NFrTjMb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1036, bad_region=30, passed=30538
Got 30538 stars (including 29426 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=258 n_q2=258 n_q3=250 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.996
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y5tL11DtDF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1093, bad_region=34, passed=30623
Got 30623 stars (including 29437 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30623 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30263 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=254 n_q2=257 n_q3=251 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-57-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_050233_TTUQ1b1x1_1050019_qdH7lhsQ/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:02:37.05 +03:19:20.3: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:27:11.78 +05:22:07.5: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:38:43.29 +01:17:26.1: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:21:48.98 +09:17:27.1: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:32:45.23 +06:17:10.3: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:27:49.13 +01:43:07.0: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:05:56.85 +09:28:28.2: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:02:37.05 +03:19:20.3: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:27:11.78 +05:22:07.5: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:38:43.29 +01:17:26.1: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:02:37.05 +03:19:20.3: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2959 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:11.78 +05:22:07.5: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0637 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:38:43.29 +01:17:26.1: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7223 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:21:48.98 +09:17:27.1: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:32:45.23 +06:17:10.3: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:45.23 +06:17:10.3: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1116 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:48.98 +09:17:27.1: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6542 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:27:49.13 +01:43:07.0: 14.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:49.13 +01:43:07.0: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4748 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:13:47.29 +03:27:15.3: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:05:56.85 +09:28:28.2: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:05:56.85 +09:28:28.2: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4473 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:13:47.29 +03:27:15.3: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:15:35.87 +06:04:06.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:10:11.63 +05:19:56.0: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:23:21.16 +08:50:35.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:44:31.47 +09:12:35.5: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:36:08.61 +02:46:20.1: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:39:46.16 +03:38:01.9: 14.39 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:22:15.06 +03:32:34.1: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:15:35.87 +06:04:06.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:23:21.16 +08:50:35.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:23:21.16 +08:50:35.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:10:11.63 +05:19:56.0: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:10:11.63 +05:19:56.0: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8972 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:44:31.47 +09:12:35.5: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:36:08.61 +02:46:20.1: 14.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:36:08.61 +02:46:20.1: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1846 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:39:46.16 +03:38:01.9: 14.30 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:39:46.16 +03:38:01.9: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4293 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:22:15.06 +03:32:34.1: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:15.06 +03:32:34.1: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5237 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:21:58.32 +09:54:53.6: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:22:33.41 +03:20:10.0: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:41:55.12 +07:16:56.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:21:16.77 +05:50:43.6: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:24:55.55 +04:47:05.6: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:21:58.32 +09:54:53.6: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:58.32 +09:54:53.6: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6313 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:22:33.41 +03:20:10.0: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:33.41 +03:20:10.0: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6341 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:41:55.12 +07:16:56.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:21:16.77 +05:50:43.6: 15.39 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:16.77 +05:50:43.6: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8240 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:24:55.55 +04:47:05.6: 15.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:55.55 +04:47:05.6: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6467 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:20:40.47 +03:31:50.9: 14.93 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:23:08.66 +04:56:59.9: 15.37 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:26:12.51 +06:50:34.2: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:21:09.00 +06:18:22.4: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:20:40.47 +03:31:50.9: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:20:40.47 +03:31:50.9: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8547 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:29.34 +06:27:55.4: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:25:12.64 +05:29:42.5: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:21:09.00 +06:18:22.4: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:23:08.66 +04:56:59.9: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:26:12.51 +06:50:34.2: 15.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:09.00 +06:18:22.4: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7058 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:08.66 +04:56:59.9: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8007 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:12.51 +06:50:34.2: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8057 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:29.34 +06:27:55.4: 14.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:29.34 +06:27:55.4: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6450 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:25:12.64 +05:29:42.5: 15.29 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:12.64 +05:29:42.5: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8337 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:21:30.29 +09:42:18.5: 15.30 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:22:54.67 +06:47:33.5: 15.09 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:48.60 +08:48:10.8: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:33:35.94 +04:18:27.7: 14.86 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:21:30.29 +09:42:18.5: 15.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:30.29 +09:42:18.5: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8138 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:44:56.55 +06:19:08.1: 15.44 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:22:54.67 +06:47:33.5: 15.29 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:02:37.86 +05:43:43.2: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:33:35.94 +04:18:27.7: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:48.60 +08:48:10.8: 15.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:54.67 +06:47:33.5: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7030 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:33:35.94 +04:18:27.7: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8627 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:48.60 +08:48:10.8: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8193 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:44:56.55 +06:19:08.1: 15.20 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:44:56.55 +06:19:08.1: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9557 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:02:37.86 +05:43:43.2: 14.89 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:02:37.86 +05:43:43.2: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8735 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52764.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52827.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52892.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53229.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52249_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 52249_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52250_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 52250_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52251_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 52251_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52252_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 52252_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52259_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 52259_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52261_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 52261_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52265_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 52265_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52266_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 52266_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52271_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 52271_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52290_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 52290_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:26:09.24 +01:36:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52650_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 52650_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52748_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 52748_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:35:20.19 +04:06:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52764_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 52764_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52787_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 52787_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:23.92 +04:23:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52796_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 52796_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52805_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 52805_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52819_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 52819_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:22:57.01 +07:26:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52827_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 52827_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52892_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 52892_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52977_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 52977_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53129_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53129_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53150_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53150_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53151_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53151_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53209_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53209_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53229_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 53229_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53237_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53237_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53242_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53242_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53250_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53250_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53261_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53261_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53280_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53280_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53282_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53282_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53296_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53296_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53298_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53298_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53303_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53303_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53304_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53304_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53329_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53329_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53362_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53362_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53389_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53389_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53390_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 53390_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51463_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 51463_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07254_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 07254_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
