NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Tau-01-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 22.36902    2461243.86902    12.74    03:51:04.05 +32:51:07.8   3644 4975   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    12.77    03:51:04.13 +32:51:07.4   3647 4976   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 22.3693  2461243.8693  12.76  03:51:04.09 +32:51:07.6
161.11541 -16.38951 galactic  Per  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 2.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
980 Anacostia               -1     -0       1  12.9     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:51:04.09 +32:51:07.6:  16.30 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:51:04.09 +32:51:07.6:  16.37 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-01-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 22.36902    2461243.86902    12.56    04:12:03.50 +25:46:39.4   6304 0635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    12.62    04:12:03.49 +25:46:39.1   6307 0636   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 22.3693  2461243.8693  12.59  04:12:03.49 +25:46:39.2
169.69360 -18.37198 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 3.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
63 Ausonia                 -0     -1       1  12.6     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:12:03.49 +25:46:39.2:  16.23 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:12:03.49 +25:46:39.2:  16.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-01-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 2

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Tau-01-Q2b1x1 reference image: Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Field Tau-01-Q2b1x1 reference image: Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Field Tau-01-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits
Field Tau-01-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Tau-01-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Tau-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Tau-01-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 980100 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 980100 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits_preview.png'
Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits

renamed 'Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits_preview.png'
Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 500.8057 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 607.2146 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1435.3700 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 457.9328 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1434.5293 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 459.0249 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.86612 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.4500007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-22T03:51:13.6999580' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-22T08:51:13.6999580' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61243.3689085534 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-22T08:51:23.6015339' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61243.3690231596 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 59.9993620052625 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.9997189369705 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 16.6527777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 64.5822222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.45103742471036 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.4500007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.4500007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 61.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.8 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 39.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.200176 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/d_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits :) Spent 0.768391 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/d_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.4099998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-22T03:51:54.1235504' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-22T08:51:54.1235504' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61243.3693764238 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-22T08:52:04.0245913' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61243.3694910184 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 59.999361941008 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.9997189337373 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 16.7783333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 64.6569444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.42655606200001 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.4099998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.4099998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 61.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.8 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 39.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.200176 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/d_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits :) Spent 0.811468 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/d_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits


fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461243.86902429 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits Image size: 940.2'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:26.844 +29:58:33.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 Second-epoch image center 04:00:26.844 +29:58:33.72 Angular distance between the image centers 0.1008 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Image size: 940.1'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:25.704 +29:58:27.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 Second-epoch image center 04:00:25.704 +29:58:27.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0972 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:00:26.844 +29:58:33.72 Second-epoch second image center 04:00:25.704 +29:58:27.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00443 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k3SIMkGNng Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v3avarZo0U Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bb7wgYU9Tc Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KCffn1cqCs Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3066 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3066 deg Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5547 out of 6059 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6059 out of 13390 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.967400 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.967400 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3066 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3066 deg Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5547 out of 6059 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6059 out of 13390 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=5.9) Read 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5745 to 69.6282 deg, Dec +24.3539 to +35.3110 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5745 to 69.6282 deg, Dec 24.3539 to 35.3110 deg Loaded 7268 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5559 out of 6072 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6072 out of 13513 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 2.0 pix Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 2.3 pix fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits 2.3 pix fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 14.2 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits 14.2 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.k3SIMkGNng (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=2635, passed=13390 Got 13390 stars (including 9811 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10845 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10845 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10845 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1064) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=367 n_q2=166 n_q3=204 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.v3avarZo0U (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=2648, passed=13513 Got 13513 stars (including 9913 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10979 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10979 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10979 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=364 n_q2=166 n_q3=207 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.209 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.bb7wgYU9Tc (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=291, bad_region=824, passed=5434 Got 5434 stars (including 4335 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5434 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013058 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010447 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4701 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4703 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4703 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.535 n_q1=350 n_q2=109 n_q3=278 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.KCffn1cqCs (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=292, bad_region=856, passed=5512 Got 5512 stars (including 4379 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5512 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013057 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010446 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4750 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4749 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4749 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.487 n_q1=349 n_q2=111 n_q3=275 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.347 worst_q_ratio=1.149 ref2=Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.209 new1=fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits sigma_overall=0.480 worst_q_ratio=1.114 new2=fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits sigma_overall=0.461 worst_q_ratio=1.087 reference average sigma_overall=0.3585 worst_q_ratio=1.179 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits Image size: 940.2'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:26.844 +29:58:33.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 Second-epoch image center 04:00:26.844 +29:58:33.72 Angular distance between the image centers 0.1008 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Image size: 940.1'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:25.704 +29:58:27.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 Second-epoch image center 04:00:25.704 +29:58:27.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0972 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:00:26.844 +29:58:33.72 Second-epoch second image center 04:00:25.704 +29:58:27.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00443 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GeaLW7dQxR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R5wbKiIhRv Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lo6ApUk4on Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uxNDUFqmq3 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3065 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3065 deg Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4827 out of 6106 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6106 out of 99190 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.820500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.820500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.14 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3065 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3065 deg Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4827 out of 6106 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6106 out of 99190 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=4.4) Read 98825 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5597 to 69.6801 deg, Dec +24.3539 to +35.3115 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5597 to 69.6801 deg, Dec 24.3539 to 35.3115 deg Loaded 7286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4807 out of 6112 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6112 out of 98825 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=4.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 68 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.8 pix Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 1.9 pix Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 2.3 pix fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits 2.3 pix fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits 1.8 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 1.9 pix wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.GeaLW7dQxR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=7855, bad_region=14549, passed=99168 Got 99168 stars (including 77549 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99168 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85110 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85111 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85111 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.282 n_q1=348 n_q2=175 n_q3=216 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.R5wbKiIhRv (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=7957, bad_region=14515, passed=98800 Got 98800 stars (including 77143 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98800 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84614 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84613 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84613 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=353 n_q2=172 n_q3=213 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Lo6ApUk4on (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1553, bad_region=4817, passed=38436 Got 38436 stars (including 32153 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38436 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013058 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010447 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34317 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34316 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34316 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.541 n_q1=360 n_q2=111 n_q3=271 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.uxNDUFqmq3 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1519, bad_region=4937, passed=38634 Got 38634 stars (including 32271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38634 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013057 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010446 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34430 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34430 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34430 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.520 n_q1=355 n_q2=111 n_q3=273 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.067 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:51:04.09 +32:51:07.6: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:12:03.49 +25:46:39.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:51:04.09 +32:51:07.6: 16.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:15:32.08 +33:49:30.2: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:12:03.49 +25:46:39.2: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:15:32.08 +33:49:30.2: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:32.08 +33:49:30.2: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0486 delta=-0.82 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:51:55.07 +27:52:20.2: 13.65 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:51:55.07 +27:52:20.2: 13.61 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:55.07 +27:52:20.2: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6071 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118824.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out119346.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 116411_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 116411_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.51    03:43:24.73 +28:20:45.4   2502 2306   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 03:43:24.73 +28:20:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 116412_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 116412_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.64    03:49:18.64 +28:09:30.9   3281 2151   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 03:49:18.48 +28:09:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 116415_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 116415_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.44    04:04:36.36 +33:59:30.2   5376 5616   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:04:36.39 +33:59:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 116926_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 116926_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    10.89    03:49:23.06 +29:26:14.2   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117257_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 117257_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    11.38    04:04:35.87 +32:58:56.2   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117337_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 117337_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    11.13    04:18:05.31 +27:16:04.9   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117821_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 117821_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    11.86    04:10:49.08 +33:34:35.7   6154 5359   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:10:49.10 +33:34:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117951_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 117951_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    11.96    03:40:07.58 +26:36:34.3   1988 1280   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 03:40:07.66 +26:36:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118411_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 118411_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    12.10    04:20:24.99 +27:22:47.7   7432 1618   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:20:24.98 +27:22:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118824_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 Preparing report for the candidate 118824_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118865_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 118865_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    12.62    03:45:56.33 +25:51:19.6   2750 0776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 119052_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 119052_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    12.58    03:56:48.35 +27:33:44.8   4266 1751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 03:56:48.29 +27:33:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 119181_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 119181_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    12.80    04:01:55.83 +31:58:48.8   5012 4402   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:01:55.87 +31:58:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 119346_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 Preparing report for the candidate 119346_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 119383_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 119383_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    12.63    04:19:29.33 +30:51:26.6   7275 3723   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:19:29.32 +30:51:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 119725_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 119725_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    12.78    04:17:07.05 +33:35:17.2   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 119831_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 119831_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    12.79    04:19:13.11 +32:39:16.1   7224 4812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 119873_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 119873_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.08    03:55:53.04 +32:10:15.1   4243 4539   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 03:55:53.07 +32:10:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 119907_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 119907_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    12.56    04:16:42.76 +26:20:28.5   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 119998_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 119998_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.26    03:44:23.95 +32:10:59.3   2774 4618   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 03:44:23.99 +32:10:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 120023_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 120023_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.05    04:08:24.94 +32:27:44.7   5845 4684   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:08:24.89 +32:27:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 120133_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 120133_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.31    03:42:21.48 +33:59:24.4   2583 5732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 03:42:21.60 +33:59:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 120151_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 120151_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.21    03:44:35.48 +27:52:29.2   2641 2011   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 03:44:35.52 +27:52:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 120153_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 120153_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.25    04:00:12.43 +29:34:22.1   4754 2954   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:00:12.48 +29:34:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 120280_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 120280_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.36    04:13:29.62 +33:27:05.2   6492 5285   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:13:29.69 +33:27:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 120320_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 120320_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 22.36902    2461243.86902    13.08    04:15:31.82 +33:49:29.6   6746 5514   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.03    04:15:32.34 +33:49:30.8   6750 5515   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 120327_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 120327_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.11    04:18:23.31 +33:51:35.7   7109 5543   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:18:23.28 +33:51:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 120396_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 120396_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.31    04:07:46.99 +33:39:15.1   5772 5407   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:07:46.90 +33:39:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 120770_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 120770_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.38    04:11:06.70 +33:36:15.0   6191 5376   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:11:06.79 +33:36:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 120776_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 120776_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.08    04:15:32.97 +33:50:07.9   6751 5522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:15:32.94 +33:50:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121096_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 121096_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.44    03:44:11.46 +25:53:39.8   2513 0812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 03:44:11.44 +25:53:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121128_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 121128_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.67    04:13:18.02 +33:49:47.1   6467 5515   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:13:17.96 +33:49:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121134_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 121134_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.29    04:07:46.03 +33:41:33.4   5770 5430   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:07:46.04 +33:41:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121202_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 121202_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.42    04:03:19.50 +34:13:50.3   5218 5764   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:03:19.50 +34:13:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121261_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 121261_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.51    03:46:03.18 +28:51:33.8   2872 2596   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 03:46:03.18 +28:51:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121352_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 121352_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.60    03:50:54.38 +29:40:02.5   3537 3053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 03:50:54.36 +29:40:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121392_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 121392_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.72    03:41:13.31 +28:42:38.7   2224 2544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 03:41:13.37 +28:42:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121408_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 121408_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.45    04:02:58.55 +28:26:30.4   5103 2263   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:02:58.66 +28:26:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121418_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 121418_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.18    04:17:13.65 +26:38:51.8   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121564_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 121564_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.43    04:11:45.05 +31:32:27.6   6270 4126   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:11:45.18 +31:32:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121741_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 121741_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.35    03:40:58.60 +25:58:05.2   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121872_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 121872_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.63    03:49:24.19 +33:35:28.3   3457 5435   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 03:49:24.09 +33:35:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 122044_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 122044_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.51    03:48:53.52 +25:45:26.6   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 122167_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 122167_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.55    04:16:52.16 +29:34:32.0   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 122173_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 122173_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.74    04:00:28.32 +33:18:46.7   4847 5213   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:00:28.22 +33:18:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 122428_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 122428_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 22.36902    2461243.86902    13.75    03:51:55.00 +27:52:19.9   3618 1962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0388.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.51    03:51:55.15 +27:52:20.5   3621 1962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 122448_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 122448_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.66    04:21:11.68 +30:56:20.6   7496 3778   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:21:11.69 +30:56:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 122507_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 122507_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.98    03:42:07.64 +30:55:14.7   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 122657_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 122657_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.63    03:42:10.29 +27:50:58.3   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 123023_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 123023_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    14.08    04:02:26.94 +31:28:21.5   5072 4094   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:02:26.95 +31:28:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 123320_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 123320_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    14.19    03:53:30.64 +29:20:39.4   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 123476_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 123476_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    14.36    03:42:33.32 +27:52:06.0   2368 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 123488_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 123488_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.69    04:13:51.57 +26:06:46.7   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 123540_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 123540_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    14.01    03:57:20.73 +33:55:12.6   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 123541_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 123541_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.90    03:50:50.96 +34:02:32.3   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 123552_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 123552_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    14.08    03:54:18.45 +33:32:55.2   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 123622_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 123622_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    14.16    03:51:33.87 +33:21:04.0   3723 5276   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 123668_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 123668_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    14.26    03:52:14.65 +30:25:51.8   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 110370_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 110370_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    12.26    03:51:16.50 +33:02:00.3   3678 5085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 03:51:16.49 +33:02:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96483_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 96483_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    12.12    04:14:16.95 +28:10:57.3   6604 2096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:14:16.97 +28:10:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30629_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 30629_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    11.77    04:01:32.04 +32:38:14.9   4971 4801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 61253_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 61253_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    12.44    03:44:27.75 +29:24:36.7   2681 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81784_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 81784_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    12.88    04:07:01.02 +28:53:02.5   5642 2522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:07:01.09 +28:53:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84145_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 84145_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    13.69    04:04:01.69 +27:15:44.1   5229 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:04:01.71 +27:15:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 62930_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 62930_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    7.22    04:07:00.05 +29:00:05.9   5640 2593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:07:00.05 +29:00:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87712_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 87712_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    7.14    04:06:36.27 +27:36:01.3   5577 1747   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:06:36.26 +27:36:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75576_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 75576_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    7.00    04:10:49.67 +26:28:52.7   6140 1064   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:10:49.67 +26:28:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86796_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 The candidate 86796_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 22.36949    2461243.86949    6.89    04:20:20.90 +27:21:01.7   7423 1600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_042405_TTUQ2b1x1_1063649_vSep5hOv/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0389.fits **** FOUND 04:20:20.91 +27:21:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 03:51:04.09 +32:51:07.6 04:12:03.49 +25:46:39.2 ########### Completed Tau-01-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 03:51:04.09 +32:51:07.6 04:12:03.49 +25:46:39.2 ################################################################################### 03:51:04.09 +32:51:07.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 04:12:03.49 +25:46:39.2 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461243.86902429 -observatory V36 07:07:30.99 +18:09:39.8 Mercury (2.5mag) 11:00:16.68 +07:09:23.6 Venus (-4.2mag) 04:59:46.79 +22:40:43.5 Mars (1.3mag) 08:27:37.94 +19:35:40.1 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:43.40 +03:22:18.8 Saturn (0.7mag) 04:09:22.37 +20:50:46.6 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:49.73 +00:18:44.3 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:29:46.63 -23:23:16.0 Pluto (14.4mag) 14:18:42.00 -19:37:29.8 Moon (-10.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 22 06:51 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461243.86902429: 08:27:37.15 +19:35:45.2 Io (6.0mag) 08:27:45.01 +19:35:12.0 Europa (6.3mag) 08:27:28.68 +19:36:20.5 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:27:44.13 +19:35:20.8 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:25:39.27 +19:25:26.5 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:27:36.17 +19:35:48.1 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:25:01.43 +19:27:19.7 Elara (17.7mag) 08:31:29.61 +19:23:29.4 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:31:53.28 +19:42:38.5 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:36.65 +03:22:45.8 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:45.92 +03:22:24.2 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:56:12.16 +03:19:45.9 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:56:43.53 +03:21:39.6 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:28.03 +03:17:48.4 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 22 06:51 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461243.86902429: 18:07:36.58 -29:50:45.0 JWST 18:58:00.86 +10:36:39.1 Chandra 05:11:41.02 +45:28:26.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 22 06:51 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461243.86902429 -observatory V36 02:52:50.53 +15:46:55.1 17.8mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:09:29.91 -34:36:02.1 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:37:37.15 -68:22:47.3 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:04:50.91 +32:39:35.1 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 02:45:41.19 +26:02:36.9 16.0mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:51:40.45 +32:08:47.0 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:25:51.13 +26:47:50.0 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:06:09.36 +29:14:13.4 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:17:35.80 +05:11:09.2 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:10:59.95 -11:42:09.3 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:33:47.24 +67:19:42.2 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:09:26.79 -11:18:35.7 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:22:05.51 +66:23:33.2 18.0mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:48:10.28 +30:35:11.4 14.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:11:15.91 +15:33:25.5 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:25:29.07 +41:25:50.5 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:33:54.73 +47:39:05.8 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:00:44.90 -13:19:49.7 15.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:44:12.77 +27:03:22.9 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:22:10.93 -14:03:52.3 17.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:10:34.88 +21:52:22.9 17.5mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:49:16.82 +03:21:48.2 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:22:03.33 +79:00:22.4 17.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:57:35.52 +45:42:57.8 16.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:33:41.10 +06:28:21.7 17.1mag A/2026 E1 21:37:02.89 -19:51:31.5 7.0mag 10P/Tempel 11:19:26.06 -02:26:51.8 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:17:09.24 +30:49:08.8 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:33:04.74 +10:08:46.2 17.1mag 63P/Wild 00:52:33.23 -05:03:58.0 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 04:56:16.56 +20:38:42.5 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:40:33.40 +12:07:24.7 16.4mag 88P/Howell 07:10:30.13 +29:37:11.9 15.9mag 93P/Lovas 05:00:27.64 +31:18:54.4 16.6mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:38:00.19 +29:13:39.5 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:10:48.75 -03:39:41.9 16.9mag 124P/Mrkos 05:10:50.64 +21:05:00.4 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 05:58:37.74 +19:31:24.7 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 07:55:21.02 +14:18:20.3 17.0mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:21:22.50 -20:29:08.0 14.9mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:16:25.89 +36:08:50.6 15.5mag 162P/SidingSpring 18:20:13.69 +23:57:05.2 13.7mag 169P/NEAT 02:08:46.52 +08:44:38.4 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:35:55.70 -08:58:09.8 17.3mag 235P/LINEAR 20:35:04.92 -51:46:43.7 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:33:18.24 +17:41:16.4 15.5mag 260P/McNaught 06:13:55.37 +37:34:38.9 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:06:51.98 +04:55:17.2 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski 08:45:28.93 +19:09:59.9 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:10:26.57 +38:12:08.7 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.4K Jul 22 06:51 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 2026-07-16.17 17.02 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 22 06:51 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 22 06:51 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 00:41:12.486 -42:30:41.52 AT 2026thu 2026-07-09.41 22.9637 19:21:59.421 -18:09:06.44 AT 2026tht 2026-07-09.25 23.5536 20:57:08.811 -19:44:38.02 AT 2026ths 2026-07-09.29 22.9916 20:36:05.451 -21:01:28.99 AT 2026thr 2026-07-09.30 22.9768 21:28:30.735 -13:12:02.42 AT 2026thq 2026-07-09.34 21.1053 23:15:36.302 -15:56:19.67 AT 2026thp 2026-07-09.35 22.954 20:46:17.542 -21:59:48.89 AT 2026tho 2026-07-09.29 22.7792 23:22:21.518 -04:57:52.50 AT 2026thn 2026-07-09.39 21.1667 04:01:26.281 -49:05:15.41 AT 2026thm 2026-07-09.42 23.5333 20:19:59.808 -11:52:00.26 AT 2026thl 2026-07-09.24 23.004 04:04:25.960 -49:17:10.25 AT 2026thk 2026-07-09.42 22.8309 20:18:30.116 -08:54:58.45 AT 2026thj 2026-07-09.27 23.008 19:31:06.780 -27:40:37.28 AT 2026thi 2026-07-09.31 22.3354 19:19:08.964 -20:49:20.86 AT 2026thh 2026-07-09.23 23.3724 23:09:35.488 -04:27:52.45 AT 2026thg 2026-07-09.35 22.3109 20:21:14.950 -12:37:31.63 AT 2026thf 2026-07-09.24 23.1886 20:14:38.286 -17:14:45.01 AT 2026the 2026-07-09.24 23.6002 19:29:06.461 -17:52:40.05 AT 2026thd 2026-07-09.23 22.8657 21:09:45.428 -13:55:34.32 AT 2026thc 2026-07-09.29 23.257 20:06:50.792 -15:37:22.53 AT 2026thb 2026-07-09.24 21.5403 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 22 06:51 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 90 C