This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.3833* 04 09 23.29 +20 50 49.1 6.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.8833,6.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.3833 6.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.3833* 04 09 23.28 +20 50 48.9 6.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.8833,6.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.3833 6.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.3833 2461243.8833 12.04 03:36:35.10 +23:10:04.7
165.29679 -25.81226 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis -0 -0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:36:35.10 +23:10:04.7: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:36:35.10 +23:10:04.7: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.3833* 03 36 35.10 +23 10 04.7 12.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.8833,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.3833 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.3833 2461243.8833 12.41 04:12:04.80 +25:46:43.5
169.69629 -18.36761 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.63 Ausonia -0 -1 1 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:12:04.80 +25:46:43.5: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:12:04.80 +25:46:43.5: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.3833* 04 12 04.80 +25 46 43.5 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.8833,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.3833 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.3833 2461243.8833 12.87 03:30:46.90 +21:49:58.4
165.12262 -27.69767 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -1 -1 1 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:46.90 +21:49:58.4: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:46.90 +21:49:58.4: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.3833* 03 30 46.90 +21 49 58.4 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.8833,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.3833 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.3833 2461243.8833 13.79 03:44:46.64 +23:16:14.5
166.78052 -24.48958 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.5" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula 2 -2 2 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:46.64 +23:16:14.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:46.64 +23:16:14.5: 16.05 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.05 +/- 0.33
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.3833* 03 44 46.64 +23 16 14.5 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.8833,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.3833 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461243.88355465 22.07.2026 09:12:09.122 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10805
Objects passed selection criteria: 10777
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8680.75
Average stars matched: 8501.75 (97.938 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119436 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 22 06:23:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461243.88355465 22.07.2026 09:12:09.122 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 113
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 40 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 66121
Objects passed selection criteria: 65949
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 51310.2
Average stars matched: 49644.5 (96.7536 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 168912 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 22 06:26:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461243.88302972
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:31.931 +22:03:03.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:31.931 +22:03:03.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0532 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.958 +22:03:07.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:33.958 +22:03:07.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0542 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:31.931 +22:03:03.97
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:33.958 +22:03:07.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00791 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T5p1rMTlNn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1R63mF9VqR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bXWTYB5h7Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zuL3YhJKmO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.5358 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.5358 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 6126 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4792 out of 5149 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5149 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.940200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.940200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.5358 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.5358 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 6126 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4792 out of 5149 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5149 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6517 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.5180 to +27.2932 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6517 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.5180 to 27.2932 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4773 out of 5143 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5143 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.T5p1rMTlNn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=0, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 10422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=293 n_q2=264 n_q3=174 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1R63mF9VqR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=0, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 10408 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=295 n_q2=262 n_q3=172 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.286
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bXWTYB5h7Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=250, bad_region=0, passed=6104
Got 6104 stars (including 5848 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6104 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5978 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5979 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5979 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=220 n_q2=161 n_q3=276 n_q4=306 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zuL3YhJKmO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=247, bad_region=0, passed=6156
Got 6156 stars (including 5901 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6156 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6020 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=218 n_q2=161 n_q3=273 n_q4=309 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.260
ref2=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.286
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.155
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.117
reference average sigma_overall=0.372 worst_q_ratio=1.273
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20577_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
Preparing report for the candidate 20577_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20639_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 20639_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.55 +24:42:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20655_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 20655_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:04.33 +25:32:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07061_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 07061_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:39.41 +21:03:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 05998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:41.66 +22:04:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:31.931 +22:03:03.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:31.931 +22:03:03.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0532 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.958 +22:03:07.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:33.958 +22:03:07.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0542 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:31.931 +22:03:03.97
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:33.958 +22:03:07.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00791 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vlILzTyXVn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fBDsRJnF5e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hSTMU8wi08
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TXJNt8s2ST
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6568 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6568 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4364 out of 5199 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5199 out of 71179 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.816200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.816200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6568 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6568 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4364 out of 5199 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5199 out of 71179 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 71492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6517 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4684 to +27.2933 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6517 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4684 to 27.2933 deg
Loaded 6156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4369 out of 5198 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5198 out of 71492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 103 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vlILzTyXVn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4312, bad_region=7, passed=71155
Got 71155 stars (including 66715 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=283 n_q2=261 n_q3=189 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fBDsRJnF5e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4374, bad_region=8, passed=71475
Got 71475 stars (including 66975 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71475 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=278 n_q2=265 n_q3=185 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hSTMU8wi08 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1197, bad_region=17, passed=31963
Got 31963 stars (including 30707 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31963 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=228 n_q2=160 n_q3=281 n_q4=294 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TXJNt8s2ST (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1235, bad_region=21, passed=32061
Got 32061 stars (including 30757 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32061 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31424 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=220 n_q2=163 n_q3=284 n_q4=296 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-11-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_042032_TTUQ1b1x1_893067_9uRtIg3Q/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:14:21.96 +23:41:22.9: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:36:35.10 +23:10:04.7: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:14:21.96 +23:41:22.9: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:21.96 +23:41:22.9: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8350 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:54.44 +23:50:01.1: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:12:04.80 +25:46:43.5: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:16:44.81 +26:19:50.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:36:35.10 +23:10:04.7: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:46.90 +21:49:58.4: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:54.44 +23:50:01.1: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:54.44 +23:50:01.1: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2695 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:16:44.81 +26:19:50.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:44.81 +26:19:50.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:12:04.80 +25:46:43.5: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:46.90 +21:49:58.4: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:16:44.99 +26:22:02.2: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:08:49.21 +25:22:53.7: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:36:51.49 +23:11:58.5: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:16:44.99 +26:22:02.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:44.99 +26:22:02.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:56:01.91 +20:46:40.6: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:08:49.21 +25:22:53.7: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:50.27 +24:29:27.8: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:49.21 +25:22:53.7: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3308 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:24.22 +22:45:54.7: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:36:51.49 +23:11:58.5: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:36:51.49 +23:11:58.5: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1891 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:56:01.91 +20:46:40.6: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:01.91 +20:46:40.6: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8607 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:50.27 +24:29:27.8: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:50.27 +24:29:27.8: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2039 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:24.22 +22:45:54.7: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:24.22 +22:45:54.7: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2428 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:55:12.99 +23:36:00.4: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:45:42.02 +24:55:05.0: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:05.73 +26:52:35.5: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:55:12.99 +23:36:00.4: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:12.99 +23:36:00.4: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2275 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:45:42.02 +24:55:05.0: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:42.02 +24:55:05.0: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3721 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:42.88 +21:10:21.7: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:41:23.26 +24:59:40.3: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:05.73 +26:52:35.5: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:05.73 +26:52:35.5: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5999 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:42.88 +21:10:21.7: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:42.88 +21:10:21.7: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2841 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:41:23.26 +24:59:40.3: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:23.26 +24:59:40.3: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5831 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:23.46 +24:31:32.6: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:23.46 +24:31:32.6: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:23.46 +24:31:32.6: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5041 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:17:57.75 +21:36:14.0: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:06.24 +25:29:03.8: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:17:57.75 +21:36:14.0: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:57.75 +21:36:14.0: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7289 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:06.24 +25:29:03.8: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:06.24 +25:29:03.8: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8154 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:46.64 +23:16:14.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:46.64 +23:16:14.5: 16.05 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.05 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:44:46.64 +23:16:14.5: ref_mag=16.05 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=13.7879 delta=2.26 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87049.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87141.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87208.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87608.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86899_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 86899_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86901_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 86901_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:55.64 +25:00:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86902_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 86902_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86904_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
Preparing report for the candidate 86904_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86967_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 86967_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.57 +24:42:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86977_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 86977_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86981_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 86981_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86985_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 86985_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86991_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 86991_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:04.29 +25:32:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87002_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87002_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87011_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87011_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87038_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87038_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87039_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87039_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87040_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87040_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87049_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
Preparing report for the candidate 87049_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87080_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87080_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87089_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87089_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87093_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87093_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87140_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87140_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:07.51 +24:00:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87141_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
Preparing report for the candidate 87141_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87184_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87184_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87186_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87186_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87208_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
Preparing report for the candidate 87208_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87212_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87212_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:27:02.56 +24:51:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87213_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87213_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87215_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87215_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87222_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87222_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87233_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87233_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87237_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87237_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:28.74 +22:02:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87267_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87267_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87295_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87295_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:56.18 +23:09:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87297_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87297_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87301_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87301_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87304_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87304_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87311_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87311_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87312_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87312_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:01.12 +24:05:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87319_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87319_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:22.87 +26:10:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87345_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87345_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87366_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87366_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87369_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87369_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:26.51 +25:41:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87374_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87374_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:18:15.38 +24:03:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87390_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87390_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:26.13 +17:35:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87391_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87391_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87398_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87398_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:12.50 +26:34:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87400_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87400_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87402_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87402_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87406_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87406_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:43.01 +18:12:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87409_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87409_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87416_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87416_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87418_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87418_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87419_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87419_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87420_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87420_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:11.28 +25:53:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87431_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87431_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:22:37.33 +24:53:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87440_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87440_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87452_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87452_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87458_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87458_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87471_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87471_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:55.33 +24:15:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87480_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87480_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:42.10 +26:21:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87493_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87493_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87497_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87497_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87504_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87504_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:28.07 +23:53:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87510_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87510_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87511_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87511_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87512_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87512_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87527_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87527_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87548_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87548_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87552_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87552_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87566_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87566_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87574_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87574_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87607_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87607_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87608_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
Preparing report for the candidate 87608_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87610_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87610_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87613_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87613_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87627_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87627_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87631_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87631_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87646_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87646_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87662_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87662_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87668_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87668_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87669_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87669_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87674_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87674_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87679_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87679_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87681_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87681_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87685_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87685_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87699_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87699_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87701_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87701_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87706_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 87706_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24649_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 24649_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:22.21 +24:09:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 45202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:39.41 +21:03:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54397_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 54397_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:04.21 +18:19:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63847_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 63847_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:48.28 +19:41:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32790_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 32790_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:13.40 +23:04:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 24998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:19.51 +23:56:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63619_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 63619_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:47.40 +19:39:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63923_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 63923_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:18.94 +19:42:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24042_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 24042_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:09.64 +24:03:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23889_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 23889_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:11.09 +24:08:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51023_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 51023_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:31.50 +17:16:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53348_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 53348_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:48.91 +18:11:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51063_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 51063_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:59.31 +17:20:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50407_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 50407_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:10.22 +17:19:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64764_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 64764_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:10.04 +19:36:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37504_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345
The candidate 37504_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_04-12-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0345 did not pass the final checks
