This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.3691* 02 19 17.27 +28 57 14.6 13.7 U Tri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461243.8691,13.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260722.3691 13.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.3691 2461243.8691 13.98 01:55:10.81 +27:26:33.2
139.88578 -33.32200 galactic Tri Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.686 Gersuind -1 -2 2 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:55:10.81 +27:26:33.2: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:55:10.81 +27:26:33.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.3691* 01 55 10.81 +27 26 33.2 14.0 U Tri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.8691,13.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.3691 13.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.3691 2461243.8691 14.41 01:39:10.64 +28:37:41.0
135.44338 -33.08122 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1467 Mashona -0 -3 3 14.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:39:10.64 +28:37:41.0: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:39:10.64 +28:37:41.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.8691,14.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.3691 14.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
First image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Last image: 2461243.86936265 22.07.2026 08:51:42.933 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11807
Objects passed selection criteria: 11799
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11146
Average stars matched: 10900.5 (97.7974 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120480 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 22 07:38:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
First image: 2461049.65440406 09.01.2026 03:42:10.511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Last image: 2461243.86936265 22.07.2026 08:51:42.933 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 66
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 41 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 68405
Objects passed selection criteria: 68260
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 61067.8
Average stars matched: 59467.5 (97.3795 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1990452 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 22 07:42:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461243.86879463
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits'
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits'
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits'
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:05.185 +30:02:12.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32
Second-epoch image center 02:00:05.185 +30:02:12.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0441 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:06.299 +30:02:41.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32
Second-epoch image center 02:00:06.299 +30:02:41.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0531 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:00:05.185 +30:02:12.00
Second-epoch second image center 02:00:06.299 +30:02:41.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00908 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HDgiW83myC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.S1u9Bh46pE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pWwMUqW5bW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KUkH1kvaja
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 12225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.6044 to 39.6615 deg, Dec +24.4131 to +35.2963 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.6044 to 39.6615 deg, Dec 24.4131 to 35.2963 deg
Loaded 8371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6352 out of 6782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6782 out of 12225 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.928900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.928900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 12225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.6044 to 39.6615 deg, Dec +24.4131 to +35.2963 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.6044 to 39.6615 deg, Dec 24.4131 to 35.2963 deg
Loaded 8371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6352 out of 6782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6782 out of 12225 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 12296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.6044 to 39.7012 deg, Dec +24.4131 to +35.3109 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.6044 to 39.7012 deg, Dec 24.4131 to 35.3109 deg
Loaded 8408 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6364 out of 6800 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6800 out of 12296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
2.0 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
15.4 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.HDgiW83myC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=932, bad_region=0, passed=12225
Got 12225 stars (including 11278 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12225 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=207 n_q2=302 n_q3=208 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.S1u9Bh46pE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=960, bad_region=0, passed=12296
Got 12296 stars (including 11323 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=208 n_q2=301 n_q3=210 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pWwMUqW5bW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=482, bad_region=0, passed=10173
Got 10173 stars (including 9679 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10173 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10046 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10045 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=227 n_q2=222 n_q3=281 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KUkH1kvaja (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=468, bad_region=1, passed=10144
Got 10144 stars (including 9663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10144 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10003 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10001 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=230 n_q2=219 n_q3=279 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.226
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits sigma_overall=0.347 worst_q_ratio=1.091
ref2=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.216
new1=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits sigma_overall=0.346 worst_q_ratio=1.250
new2=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.226
reference average sigma_overall=0.32 worst_q_ratio=1.1535
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322_astrometric_residuals.png (952 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323_astrometric_residuals.png (949 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:29:57.93 +33:59:34.7: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:03:18.18 +29:21:18.3: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:58:34.44 +31:22:43.8: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:57:23.78 +29:49:51.9: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 02:03:18.18 +29:21:18.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 02:29:57.93 +33:59:34.7: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:03:18.18 +29:21:18.3: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4052 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:58:34.44 +31:22:43.8: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:29:57.93 +33:59:34.7: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4486 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:58:34.44 +31:22:43.8: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4288 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:57:23.78 +29:49:51.9: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:57:23.78 +29:49:51.9: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4941 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20773_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 20773_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:56:47.01 +34:01:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20820_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 20820_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:07:50.90 +27:56:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20912_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 20912_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20919_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 20919_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20922_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 20922_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20925_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 20925_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00571_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 00571_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:01.83 +34:15:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:05.185 +30:02:12.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32
Second-epoch image center 02:00:05.185 +30:02:12.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0441 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:00:06.299 +30:02:41.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:00:00.721 +29:59:44.32
Second-epoch image center 02:00:06.299 +30:02:41.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0531 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:00:05.185 +30:02:12.00
Second-epoch second image center 02:00:06.299 +30:02:41.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00908 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OVWDLLPwzt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jo7cfl2LQO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits &> /tmp/tmp.shu7XXNsBx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nrRGpzYZsd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits and wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 73246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.5719 to 39.6906 deg, Dec +24.3227 to +35.3068 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.5719 to 39.6906 deg, Dec 24.3227 to 35.3068 deg
Loaded 8456 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5809 out of 6892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6892 out of 73246 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 73246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.5719 to 39.6906 deg, Dec +24.3227 to +35.3068 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.5719 to 39.6906 deg, Dec 24.3227 to 35.3068 deg
Loaded 8456 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5809 out of 6892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6892 out of 73246 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 72377 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 20.5785 to 39.7012 deg, Dec +24.3308 to +35.3160 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 20.5785 to 39.7012 deg, Dec 24.3308 to 35.3160 deg
Loaded 8467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5844 out of 6896 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6896 out of 72377 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 63 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
2.0 pix Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
15.6 mag. Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OVWDLLPwzt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4778, bad_region=6, passed=73229
Got 73229 stars (including 68317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73229 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72658 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72658 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72658 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=214 n_q2=289 n_q3=215 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jo7cfl2LQO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits' -> 'wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4568, bad_region=8, passed=72353
Got 72353 stars (including 67651 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72353 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71649 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=214 n_q2=285 n_q3=221 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits -region wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.shu7XXNsBx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2317, bad_region=34, passed=50199
Got 50199 stars (including 47792 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50199 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49643 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.233 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=228 n_q2=218 n_q3=281 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nrRGpzYZsd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2345, bad_region=32, passed=50055
Got 50055 stars (including 47623 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50055 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=226 n_q2=218 n_q3=284 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits -region wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-50-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0322.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_040032_TTUQ1b1x1_3370669_yP1aaZyS/wcs_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:37:33.71 +30:33:07.7: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:31:47.22 +34:52:55.2: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:58:48.11 +32:51:26.4: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:11:53.09 +32:50:05.8: 13.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:27:17.12 +33:34:43.2: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:59:36.05 +27:39:27.5: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:37:33.71 +30:33:07.7: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:31:47.22 +34:52:55.2: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:37:33.71 +30:33:07.7: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4148 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:58:48.11 +32:51:26.4: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 02:11:53.09 +32:50:05.8: 13.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:31:47.22 +34:52:55.2: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5026 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:58:48.11 +32:51:26.4: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3772 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:11:53.09 +32:50:05.8: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9416 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 02:27:17.12 +33:34:43.2: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:27:17.12 +33:34:43.2: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3122 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:59:36.05 +27:39:27.5: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:59:36.05 +27:39:27.5: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4602 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:51:42.07 +33:45:28.9: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:59:16.77 +34:32:17.7: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:35:08.55 +28:43:12.4: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:59:16.77 +34:32:17.7: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:59:16.77 +34:32:17.7: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8030 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:10:20.39 +25:24:46.7: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:51:42.07 +33:45:28.9: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:49:52.59 +27:13:35.1: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:51:42.07 +33:45:28.9: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7780 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:35:08.55 +28:43:12.4: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:35:08.55 +28:43:12.4: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8753 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 02:10:20.39 +25:24:46.7: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:32:33.17 +29:39:09.2: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:33:13.84 +34:13:00.3: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:10:20.39 +25:24:46.7: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7259 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:49:52.59 +27:13:35.1: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:35:55.23 +30:44:38.0: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:49:52.59 +27:13:35.1: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8944 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:28:01.06 +31:51:00.0: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:35:55.23 +30:44:38.0: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:32:33.17 +29:39:09.2: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:33:13.84 +34:13:00.3: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:35:55.23 +30:44:38.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0118 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:32:33.17 +29:39:09.2: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9407 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:33:13.84 +34:13:00.3: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0519 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 02:28:01.06 +31:51:00.0: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:28:01.06 +31:51:00.0: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9902 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:56:01.62 +29:51:25.9: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:35:36.94 +31:45:14.2: 14.47 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:44:00.58 +32:44:47.7: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:55:10.81 +27:26:33.2: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:56:01.62 +29:51:25.9: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:56:01.62 +29:51:25.9: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0394 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:35:36.94 +31:45:14.2: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:44:00.58 +32:44:47.7: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:35:36.94 +31:45:14.2: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1470 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:55:10.81 +27:26:33.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:44:00.58 +32:44:47.7: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1071 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:59:36.92 +27:38:59.3: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 02:07:27.48 +27:14:35.1: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:53:04.92 +32:12:19.5: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:39:10.64 +28:37:41.0: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:28:36.13 +31:36:59.8: 14.82 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:59:36.92 +27:38:59.3: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:59:36.92 +27:38:59.3: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0982 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:40:29.78 +30:21:06.9: 15.19 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 02:07:27.48 +27:14:35.1: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:07:27.48 +27:14:35.1: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2770 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:31:12.82 +31:19:10.5: 15.26 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0113.fits at 01:51:02.22 +33:28:20.6: 15.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:53:04.92 +32:12:19.5: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:53:04.92 +32:12:19.5: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3290 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:39:10.64 +28:37:41.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:28:36.13 +31:36:59.8: 14.83 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:28:36.13 +31:36:59.8: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7486 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:40:29.78 +30:21:06.9: 15.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:40:29.78 +30:21:06.9: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7618 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:31:12.82 +31:19:10.5: 15.25 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-43-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0114.fits at 01:51:02.22 +33:28:20.6: 15.03 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:31:12.82 +31:19:10.5: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9051 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:51:02.22 +33:28:20.6: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9665 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88804.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88975.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88138_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88138_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:08.55 +30:14:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88142_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88142_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88147_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88147_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:09:22.68 +28:22:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88150_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88150_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88312_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88312_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88438_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88438_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:01.72 +33:53:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88457_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88457_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:38.29 +33:19:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88464_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88464_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:31:50.00 +28:50:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88488_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88488_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:57.71 +34:55:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88509_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88509_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88518_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88518_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88570_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88570_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:19.54 +32:43:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88573_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88573_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:17.91 +33:51:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88577_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88577_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:03:34.23 +25:10:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88580_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88580_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:15:47.44 +33:20:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88587_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88587_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88588_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88588_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:55:04.22 +27:16:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88600_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88600_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:20:15.20 +29:48:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88605_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88605_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:09:18.51 +33:55:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88614_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88614_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:11:10.66 +25:57:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88617_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88617_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:50:34.57 +27:57:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88620_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88620_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88630_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88630_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:58:08.31 +31:05:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88646_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88646_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88652_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88652_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88655_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88655_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:39:26.22 +27:11:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88665_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88665_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:18.39 +29:40:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88680_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
Preparing report for the candidate 88680_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88695_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88695_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:02:23.64 +29:44:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88698_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88698_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88712_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88712_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88714_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88714_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:44:09.79 +30:29:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88729_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88729_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:32:08.53 +30:44:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88730_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88730_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:45:38.69 +34:16:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88731_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88731_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:49:19.43 +32:26:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88743_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88743_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88745_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88745_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88747_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88747_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88757_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88757_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88758_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88758_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:35:42.23 +34:46:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88760_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88760_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:58:39.08 +33:33:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88775_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88775_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88778_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88778_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:02:13.31 +34:39:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88789_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88789_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88804_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
Preparing report for the candidate 88804_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88809_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88809_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88811_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88811_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:34:46.19 +29:35:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88826_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88826_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:34:16.40 +33:46:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88828_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88828_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:58:02.02 +28:29:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88843_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88843_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88857_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88857_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:54:41.61 +31:50:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88948_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88948_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88950_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 88950_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88975_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
Preparing report for the candidate 88975_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89058_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 89058_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89087_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 89087_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89105_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 89105_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89141_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 89141_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63437_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 63437_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08905_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 08905_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:15.78 +33:57:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68673_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 68673_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:07:50.91 +27:56:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02802_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 02802_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:01.80 +34:15:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10047_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323
The candidate 10047_fd_Tri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_03-51-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0323 did not pass the final checks