This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.2736 2461243.7736 9.20 20:45:09.89 -27:23:29.3
17.42079 -35.87433 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.324 Bamberga 2 1 2 9.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:45:09.89 -27:23:29.3: 14.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:45:09.89 -27:23:29.3: 14.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.2736* 20 45 09.89 -27 23 29.3 9.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.7736,9.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.2736 9.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.2736 2461243.7736 12.47 20:56:19.65 -25:06:50.6
20.99395 -37.68010 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.388 Charybdis -1 1 1 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:56:19.65 -25:06:50.6: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:56:19.65 -25:06:50.6: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.2736* 20 56 19.65 -25 06 50.6 12.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.7736,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.2736 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.2736 2461243.7736 12.74 20:54:12.99 -29:55:43.3
14.91998 -38.40549 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.769 Tatjana -0 0 1 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:54:12.99 -29:55:43.3: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:54:12.99 -29:55:43.3: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.2736* 20 54 12.99 -29 55 43.3 12.7 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.7736,12.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.2736 12.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.2736 2461243.7736 13.79 20:55:58.28 -25:13:51.6
20.82401 -37.63461 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.325 Heidelberga -1 2 2 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:55:58.28 -25:13:51.6: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:55:58.28 -25:13:51.6: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.2736* 20 55 58.28 -25 13 51.6 13.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.7736,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.2736 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.82423715 17.06.2026 07:46:44.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
First image: 2461208.82423715 17.06.2026 07:46:44.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Last image: 2461243.77394632 22.07.2026 06:34:18.962 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 3750
Objects passed selection criteria: 3749
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3651.5
Average stars matched: 3554.25 (97.3367 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 22 02:02:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.82423715 17.06.2026 07:46:44.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
First image: 2461208.82423715 17.06.2026 07:46:44.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Last image: 2461243.77394632 22.07.2026 06:34:18.962 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 147
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.99
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28294
Objects passed selection criteria: 28231
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27059
Average stars matched: 25985.8 (96.0337 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 138764 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 22 02:05:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461243.77321591
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:11.706 -25:59:52.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19
Second-epoch image center 21:07:11.706 -25:59:52.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0447 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:09.033 -25:59:54.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:06:59.939 -25:59:26.19
Second-epoch image center 21:07:09.033 -25:59:54.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0350 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:07:11.706 -25:59:52.55
Second-epoch second image center 21:07:09.033 -25:59:54.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01003 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hYlhKj0uRK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d9bXWJNHdk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oOc4mc8dhT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0xxRK9QL0k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4590 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7573 to 325.7549 deg, Dec -31.2624 to -20.5568 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7573 to 325.7549 deg, Dec -31.2624 to -20.5568 deg
Loaded 7064 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3816 out of 3873 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3873 out of 4590 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.445150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.445150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.12
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.12
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4590 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7573 to 325.7549 deg, Dec -31.2624 to -20.5568 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7573 to 325.7549 deg, Dec -31.2624 to -20.5568 deg
Loaded 7064 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3816 out of 3873 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3873 out of 4590 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 4645 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7571 to 325.7547 deg, Dec -31.2444 to -20.5156 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7571 to 325.7547 deg, Dec -31.2444 to -20.5156 deg
Loaded 7088 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3849 out of 3914 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3914 out of 4645 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.3 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
14.1 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hYlhKj0uRK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=305, bad_region=905, passed=4590
Got 4590 stars (including 3428 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=326 n_q2=169 n_q3=313 n_q4=169 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.d9bXWJNHdk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=311, bad_region=919, passed=4645
Got 4645 stars (including 3467 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4645 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=319 n_q2=167 n_q3=320 n_q4=171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oOc4mc8dhT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=334, bad_region=826, passed=4443
Got 4443 stars (including 3358 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4443 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.434 n_q1=322 n_q2=164 n_q3=319 n_q4=164 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0xxRK9QL0k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=332, bad_region=847, passed=4496
Got 4496 stars (including 3397 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4496 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=325 n_q2=166 n_q3=314 n_q4=164 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.159
ref2=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.232
new1=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits sigma_overall=0.422 worst_q_ratio=1.238
new2=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.262
reference average sigma_overall=0.3735 worst_q_ratio=1.1955
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-33-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0252.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_015704_TTUQ2b1x1_2368190_f2OcByat/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 21:01:25.83 -23:03:16.5: 11.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-46-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 20:45:09.89 -27:23:29.3: 14.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 21:01:25.83 -23:03:16.5: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:25.83 -23:03:16.5: ref_mag=11.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2030 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_02-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 20:45:09.89 -27:23:29.3: 14.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20224.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20224_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 20224_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20229_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20229_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:54:26.47 -27:44:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20231_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 20231_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52305_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52305_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52307_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52307_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52308_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52308_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52309_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52309_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52310_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52310_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52311_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52311_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52317_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52317_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52320_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52320_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52321_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52321_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52323_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52323_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52326_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52326_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52327_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52327_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52329_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52329_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52334_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52334_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52336_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52336_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52337_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52337_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52339_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52339_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:45:09.91 -27:23:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52371_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 52371_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52372_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52372_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:14:45.43 -27:58:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52377_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 52377_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52396_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52396_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52404_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52404_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52412_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52412_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52413_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52413_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52417_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52417_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52420_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52420_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52425_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52425_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52441_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52441_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52446_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52446_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52453_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52453_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52461_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52461_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52462_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52462_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52464_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52464_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52471_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52471_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52472_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52472_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52473_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52473_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52476_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52476_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52478_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52478_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52482_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52482_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52489_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52489_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52493_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52493_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52498_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52498_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52506_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52506_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52507_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52507_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52509_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52509_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52510_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52510_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52513_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52513_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52519_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52519_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52521_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52521_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52523_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52523_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52526_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52526_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52538_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52538_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52541_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52541_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52545_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52545_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52547_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52547_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52549_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52549_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52552_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52552_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52562_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52562_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52566_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52566_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52578_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52578_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52580_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52580_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52582_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52582_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52585_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52585_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52586_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52586_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52588_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52588_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52589_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52589_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52607_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52607_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52613_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 52613_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52659_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 52659_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08641_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 08641_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_01-34-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks