This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.2231 2461243.7231 11.20 20:30:06.73 -23:30:42.1
20.70755 -31.50164 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.3 pix This object is listed in planets.txt 522.0" Pluto (14.4mag)The object was found in VSX 1" AY Cap
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.100 V 13.200 V 2452173.20000 194.000000000000
The object was found in astcheck.134340 Pluto 284 -445 528 15.0 0 -0
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the predicted asteroid brightness, but the matched variable star above likely accounts for this object.
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.2231* 20 30 06.73 -23 30 42.1 11.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AY Cap,2461243.7231,11.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AY Cap 20260722.2231 11.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.2231 2461243.7231 13.10 19:54:34.63 -25:27:09.2
15.64065 -24.49202 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.66 Maja 1 -0 1 13.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:54:34.63 -25:27:09.2: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:54:34.63 -25:27:09.2: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.7231,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.2231 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.2231 2461243.7231 13.73 20:07:45.75 -21:00:32.5
21.40531 -25.79035 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1105 Fragaria 1 1 1 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:07:45.75 -21:00:32.5: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:07:45.75 -21:00:32.5: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.2231* 20 07 45.75 -21 00 32.5 13.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.7231,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.2231 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 22.2231 2461243.7231 13.51 20:19:54.65 -27:04:37.8
15.92828 -30.39298 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.267 Tirza 0 -1 1 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:19:54.65 -27:04:37.8: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:19:54.65 -27:04:37.8: 14.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 22.2231* 20 19 54.65 -27 04 37.8 13.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461243.7231,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260722.2231 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461243.72428056 22.07.2026 05:22:47.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 18
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7202
Objects passed selection criteria: 7201
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6728.75
Average stars matched: 6576 (97.7299 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116036 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 22 01:53:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461243.72428056 22.07.2026 05:22:47.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 89
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 42 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 56233
Objects passed selection criteria: 56140
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 51190.5
Average stars matched: 49479.2 (96.6571 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 161920 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-162-g0b3e9b13
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jul 22 01:57:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461243.72189813
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.427 -26:04:48.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:38.427 -26:04:48.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0840 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:39.943 -26:04:28.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:39.943 -26:04:28.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0786 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:38.427 -26:04:48.07
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:39.943 -26:04:28.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00786 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PVhyt5P26V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5klYVC1qtY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fvRE5R4hOb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NfVXpHT1pZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.601900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.601900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6769 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4446 deg, Dec -31.2472 to -20.5564 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4446 deg, Dec -31.2472 to -20.5564 deg
Loaded 9425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5485 out of 5600 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5600 out of 6769 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
3.9 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.2 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PVhyt5P26V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=461, bad_region=0, passed=7487
Got 7487 stars (including 7021 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.715 n_q1=238 n_q2=214 n_q3=259 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.314
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5klYVC1qtY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=427, bad_region=0, passed=6769
Got 6769 stars (including 6336 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6769 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=227 n_q2=222 n_q3=251 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.110
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fvRE5R4hOb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=258, bad_region=0, passed=6446
Got 6446 stars (including 6186 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6446 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.234 n_q1=251 n_q2=194 n_q3=282 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.327
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NfVXpHT1pZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=383, bad_region=0, passed=6372
Got 6372 stars (including 5978 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6372 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=262 n_q2=199 n_q3=270 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits sigma_overall=0.544 worst_q_ratio=1.314
ref2=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits sigma_overall=0.472 worst_q_ratio=1.110
new1=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.316 worst_q_ratio=1.327
new2=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.090
reference average sigma_overall=0.508 worst_q_ratio=1.212
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:45:42.98 -25:15:56.2: 11.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:38.77 -20:53:44.1: 11.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:32.35 -21:55:15.5: 11.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:30:50.65 -31:07:52.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:00.23 -21:49:21.2: 11.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:45:29.31 -24:51:33.8: 11.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:49:36.34 -21:58:26.0: 11.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:45:42.98 -25:15:56.2: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:41:38.77 -20:53:44.1: 11.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:42.98 -25:15:56.2: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4459 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:30:50.65 -31:07:52.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:50.65 -31:07:52.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:38.77 -20:53:44.1: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3508 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:43:00.23 -21:49:21.2: 11.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:00.23 -21:49:21.2: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4216 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:43:32.35 -21:55:15.5: 11.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:32.35 -21:55:15.5: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1885 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:45:29.31 -24:51:33.8: 11.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:32.88 -22:42:53.7: 11.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:19:34.22 -22:00:46.7: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:29.31 -24:51:33.8: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4224 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:49:36.34 -21:58:26.0: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:36.34 -21:58:26.0: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4956 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:19:34.22 -22:00:46.7: 11.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:43:32.88 -22:42:53.7: 11.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:34.22 -22:00:46.7: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5256 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:32.88 -22:42:53.7: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4863 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:35:19.14 -26:51:15.5: 11.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:17.93 -20:53:40.2: 11.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:32.25 -22:53:43.1: 11.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:51:45.76 -22:05:29.2: 11.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:38:17.93 -20:53:40.2: 11.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:17.93 -20:53:40.2: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5451 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:43:32.25 -22:53:43.1: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:32.25 -22:53:43.1: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5529 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:35:19.14 -26:51:15.5: 11.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:51:45.76 -22:05:29.2: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:19.14 -26:51:15.5: ref_mag=11.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4582 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:45.76 -22:05:29.2: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5595 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20208_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20208_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:04.33 -28:31:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20286_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20286_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20308_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20308_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:58.04 -22:58:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20309_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 20309_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20315_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20315_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20329_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20329_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20336_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20336_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20359_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20359_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20366_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20366_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20374_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20374_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20379_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20379_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20380_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20380_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20391_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20391_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20396_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20396_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20398_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20398_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20399_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20399_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.427 -26:04:48.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:38.427 -26:04:48.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0840 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:39.943 -26:04:28.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:39.943 -26:04:28.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0786 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:38.427 -26:04:48.07
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:39.943 -26:04:28.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00786 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3LzyIaQUHg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zLih6sqCtn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WZW5YXTXZN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bA2OxB7crW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 59775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Loaded 9495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7512 out of 8123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8123 out of 59775 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.442600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.442600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 59775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Loaded 9495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7512 out of 8123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8123 out of 59775 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 55659 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3218 to 311.4446 deg, Dec -31.2543 to -20.5313 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3218 to 311.4446 deg, Dec -31.2543 to -20.5313 deg
Loaded 9473 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7582 out of 8132 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8132 out of 55659 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 75 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3LzyIaQUHg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2722, bad_region=2, passed=59768
Got 59768 stars (including 56968 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.690 n_q1=249 n_q2=208 n_q3=247 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zLih6sqCtn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2376, bad_region=0, passed=55644
Got 55644 stars (including 53197 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=233 n_q2=221 n_q3=233 n_q4=285 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WZW5YXTXZN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1587, bad_region=1, passed=38127
Got 38127 stars (including 36500 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38127 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.231 n_q1=232 n_q2=190 n_q3=293 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.347
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bA2OxB7crW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1871, bad_region=0, passed=52754
Got 52754 stars (including 50795 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52754 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=258 n_q2=202 n_q3=269 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-19-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-22_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_002328_TTUQ1b1x1_3359687_u78rRlu3/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:51:26.49 -23:35:28.2: 13.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:21:35.41 -24:12:48.3: 13.86 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:58:06.13 -21:35:08.1: 13.83 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:58.16 -22:05:23.1: 13.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:25:20.62 -29:28:54.9: 12.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:34:33.44 -29:59:09.5: 12.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:58:21.51 -22:33:45.0: 13.87 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:30.02 -23:55:38.9: 12.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:30:50.65 -31:07:52.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:40:29.50 -21:32:07.9: 12.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:21:35.41 -24:12:48.3: 14.38 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:25:20.62 -29:28:54.9: 12.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:35.41 -24:12:48.3: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9764 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:51:26.49 -23:35:28.2: 13.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:20.62 -29:28:54.9: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9460 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:41:58.16 -22:05:23.1: 13.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:26.49 -23:35:28.2: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1652 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:58.16 -22:05:23.1: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6295 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:34:33.44 -29:59:09.5: 12.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:58:06.13 -21:35:08.1: 13.77 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:34:33.44 -29:59:09.5: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4373 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:06.13 -21:35:08.1: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7579 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:41:30.02 -23:55:38.9: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:58:21.51 -22:33:45.0: 13.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:21.51 -22:33:45.0: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9053 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:30.02 -23:55:38.9: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0516 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:30:50.65 -31:07:52.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:50.65 -31:07:52.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:40:29.50 -21:32:07.9: 12.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:29.50 -21:32:07.9: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8311 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:39.04 -21:56:15.3: 12.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:36:46.61 -25:37:51.4: 12.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:13:51.73 -30:41:22.4: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:50:21.96 -23:36:04.6: 12.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:39:40.08 -21:09:45.5: 13.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:17.53 -29:36:47.6: 13.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:02.38 -28:19:47.7: 13.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:36:46.61 -25:37:51.4: 12.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:46.61 -25:37:51.4: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7758 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:13:51.73 -30:41:22.4: 12.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:43:39.04 -21:56:15.3: 12.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:39:59.89 -25:46:14.7: 13.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:52:27.37 -24:45:14.8: 13.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:39.04 -21:56:15.3: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3596 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:51.73 -30:41:22.4: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8205 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:50:21.96 -23:36:04.6: 12.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:21.96 -23:36:04.6: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9782 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:43:17.53 -29:36:47.6: 13.29 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:17.53 -29:36:47.6: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.0095 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:39:40.08 -21:09:45.5: 13.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:40.08 -21:09:45.5: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0915 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:42:02.38 -28:19:47.7: 13.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:02.38 -28:19:47.7: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2362 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:39:59.89 -25:46:14.7: 13.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:59.89 -25:46:14.7: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4141 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:52:27.37 -24:45:14.8: 13.65 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:54:34.63 -25:27:09.2: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:27.37 -24:45:14.8: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2369 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:54:34.63 -25:27:09.2: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:38:35.83 -29:22:09.5: 13.63 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:40:07.46 -24:41:37.7: 14.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:37:57.78 -21:47:49.1: 14.20 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:19.17 -29:52:39.6: 13.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:33.91 -24:13:10.6: 14.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:17.68 -21:56:27.2: 13.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:38:35.83 -29:22:09.5: 13.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:00.11 -20:51:02.9: 14.33 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:35.83 -29:22:09.5: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2212 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:52.24 -24:40:26.1: 13.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:41:33.91 -24:13:10.6: 13.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:37:57.78 -21:47:49.1: 13.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:41:19.17 -29:52:39.6: 13.46 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:33.91 -24:13:10.6: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6138 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:40:07.46 -24:41:37.7: 14.24 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:57.78 -21:47:49.1: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6559 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:19.17 -29:52:39.6: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2989 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:07.46 -24:41:37.7: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4648 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:42:17.68 -21:56:27.2: 13.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:07:45.75 -21:00:32.5: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:17.68 -21:56:27.2: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7167 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:38:00.11 -20:51:02.9: 13.91 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:00.11 -20:51:02.9: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6555 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:43:52.24 -24:40:26.1: 14.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:52.24 -24:40:26.1: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4548 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:39:36.29 -22:05:19.7: 13.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:07:45.75 -21:00:32.5: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:31.32 -25:01:44.7: 13.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:19:54.65 -27:04:37.8: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:39:36.29 -22:05:19.7: 14.17 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:36.29 -22:05:19.7: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7324 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:26.64 -25:31:43.6: 13.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:36:50.45 -29:04:46.1: 13.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:42.80 -21:17:51.1: 13.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:52.06 -21:19:11.9: 13.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:59.29 -21:51:18.2: 13.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:43:31.32 -25:01:44.7: 13.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:31.32 -25:01:44.7: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6828 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:19:54.65 -27:04:37.8: 14.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:40:26.64 -25:31:43.6: 13.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:26.64 -25:31:43.6: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4467 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:36:50.45 -29:04:46.1: 13.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:50.45 -29:04:46.1: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5343 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:38:42.80 -21:17:51.1: 14.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:41:52.06 -21:19:11.9: 13.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:42.80 -21:17:51.1: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8631 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:52.06 -21:19:11.9: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6385 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:40:59.29 -21:51:18.2: 14.33 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:34.85 -22:20:39.0: 13.76 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:59.29 -21:51:18.2: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7451 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:29.93 -23:04:34.7: 14.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:41:34.85 -22:20:39.0: 13.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:34.85 -22:20:39.0: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8454 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:59.84 -25:44:19.2: 13.89 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:12.31 -21:15:53.7: 13.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:50:52.70 -20:51:18.5: 14.39 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:39:25.70 -20:54:41.1: 14.20 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:04.14 -23:13:37.6: 13.98 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:42:29.93 -23:04:34.7: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:29.93 -23:04:34.7: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7505 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:40:59.84 -25:44:19.2: 13.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:59.84 -25:44:19.2: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7568 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:41:12.31 -21:15:53.7: 14.13 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:50:52.70 -20:51:18.5: 14.39 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:12.31 -21:15:53.7: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7732 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:39:25.70 -20:54:41.1: 14.55 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:52.70 -20:51:18.5: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7827 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:25.70 -20:54:41.1: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7613 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:43:04.14 -23:13:37.6: 13.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:19.05 -21:39:02.2: 14.32 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:04.14 -23:13:37.6: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5018 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:43:19.05 -21:39:02.2: 14.43 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:14:47.07 -22:27:40.3: 14.55 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:19.05 -21:39:02.2: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.0294 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:39:53.91 -22:29:43.3: 14.38 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:14:47.07 -22:27:40.3: 14.92 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:47.07 -22:27:40.3: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.9699 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:33.97 -23:34:58.7: 14.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:53:09.66 -25:36:02.3: 14.26 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:53:28.75 -22:35:36.3: 14.41 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:03:31.68 -21:42:25.0: 14.39 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:39:53.91 -22:29:43.3: 14.78 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:53.91 -22:29:43.3: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.8429 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:53:09.66 -25:36:02.3: 14.59 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:39:33.97 -23:34:58.7: 14.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:09.66 -25:36:02.3: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9547 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:33.97 -23:34:58.7: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9058 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 19:53:28.75 -22:35:36.3: 14.37 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_03-27-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 20:03:31.68 -21:42:25.0: 14.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:28.75 -22:35:36.3: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1305 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:31.68 -21:42:25.0: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0355 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74314.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74493.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74513.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73336_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73336_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73339_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73339_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73340_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73340_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73341_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73341_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73346_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73346_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:33.19 -21:46:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73355_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73355_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73356_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73356_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73359_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73359_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73360_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73360_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73362_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73362_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:17.39 -20:36:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73365_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73365_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73488_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73488_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73500_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73500_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:58.05 -22:58:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73551_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73551_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73609_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73609_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73618_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73618_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:01.51 -23:10:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73622_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73622_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:55.34 -23:25:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73794_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73794_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73958_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73958_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:29.09 -30:48:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73965_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 73965_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:25.88 -21:31:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74041_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74041_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74043_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74043_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74135_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74135_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74161_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74161_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74177_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74177_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74220_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74220_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74227_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74227_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74300_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74300_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74314_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 74314_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74339_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74339_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74346_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74346_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74372_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74372_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74374_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74374_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74396_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74396_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74443_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74443_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74445_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74445_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74451_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74451_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74457_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74457_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74472_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74472_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:23.49 -22:48:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74473_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74473_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74481_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74481_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74493_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 74493_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74499_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74499_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74500_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74500_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74508_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74508_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:48.83 -22:36:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74513_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 74513_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74525_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74525_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74527_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74527_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74533_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74533_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74538_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74538_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74542_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74542_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74548_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74548_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74552_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74552_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74557_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74557_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74574_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74574_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74581_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74581_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74583_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74583_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74585_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74585_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74608_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74608_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74625_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74625_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74628_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74628_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74630_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74630_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74647_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74647_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74651_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74651_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74653_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74653_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74657_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74657_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74661_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74661_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74685_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 74685_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71065_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 71065_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:17.04 -27:05:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70080_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 70080_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:08.99 -28:46:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14951_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 14951_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:57.79 -27:55:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69974_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 69974_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:44.28 -29:54:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11495_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 11495_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:04.32 -28:31:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18227_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 18227_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:40.42 -27:15:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50115_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 50115_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-22-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks