NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-09-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.46021    2461242.96021    11.98    00:01:32.67 -13:55:50.2   4552 0730   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.46096    2461242.96096    12.15    00:01:32.69 -13:55:50.4   4560 0726   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 21.4606  2461242.9606  12.06  00:01:32.68 -13:55:50.3
 79.03506 -72.40170 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
23 Thalia                   0     -0       0  12.4     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:01:32.68 -13:55:50.3:  14.77 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:01:32.68 -13:55:50.3:  14.47 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-09-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.46021    2461242.96021    13.00    00:05:05.95 -13:51:10.4   4029 0686   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.46096    2461242.96096    12.91    00:05:05.96 -13:51:12.6   4037 0682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 21.4606  2461242.9606  12.96  00:05:05.95 -13:51:11.5
 81.46136 -72.87727 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 9.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
259 Aletheia                 0      1       1  13.0    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:05:05.95 -13:51:11.5:  14.80 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:05:05.95 -13:51:11.5:  14.47 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-09-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 2

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-09-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-09-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1192127 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1192127 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits

renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2282.0439 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 562.6765 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 9457.6317 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1840.2181 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 10959.5795 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 2129.3289 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.14437 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.136 ERROR: passing clouds (SD ratio=0.136 soft threshold=0.12) ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 20.7800006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 21.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-21T06:02:31.8389095' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-21T11:02:31.8389095' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61242.4600907178 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-21T11:02:41.7439616' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61242.4602053589 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.996045599819 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9996740220277 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 38.3419444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 183.211666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.60951633059439 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20471 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20471 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.7800006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.7800006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 67.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits :) Spent 0.501822 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 20.4099998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 21.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-21T06:03:36.5453963' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-21T11:03:36.5453963' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61242.4608396413 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-21T11:03:46.4489008' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61242.4609542591 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 0.000216063849727 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9996742245345 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 38.3286111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 183.545833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.60998776664136 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20471 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20471 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.4099998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.4099998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 67.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits :) Spent 0.496084 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461242.96020646 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits' wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits' wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits Image size: 938.1'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.235 -18:00:12.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64 Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.235 -18:00:12.42 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0096 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:02.525 -18:00:40.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64 Second-epoch image center 00:00:02.525 -18:00:40.60 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0240 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 23:59:59.235 -18:00:12.42 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:02.525 -18:00:40.60 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01521 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KqXlusN5Li Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zH7jGj6ZFY Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5yLRcTXFiR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0OCKFMYdvw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 2302 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0042 to 359.9883 deg, Dec -23.2538 to -12.6277 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0042 to 359.9883 deg, Dec -23.2538 to -12.6277 deg Loaded 190804 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1878 out of 1902 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 1902 out of 2302 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.281200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.281200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.30 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.98 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.98
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 2302 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0042 to 359.9883 deg, Dec -23.2538 to -12.6277 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0042 to 359.9883 deg, Dec -23.2538 to -12.6277 deg Loaded 190804 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1878 out of 1902 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 1902 out of 2302 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 1693 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0054 to 359.9884 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6278 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0054 to 359.9884 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6278 deg Loaded 190803 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1325 out of 1343 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 1343 out of 1693 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 2.3 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits 2.3 pix wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 2.3 pix wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.0 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 13.7 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits 13.8 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 10.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.KqXlusN5Li (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=176, bad_region=441, passed=2298 Got 2298 stars (including 1705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2298 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5850 through 0 to 8.4070, gap 8.4070 to 351.5850 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1887 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4071, gap 8.4071 to 351.5847 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1889 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1889 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1049) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.407 n_q1=307 n_q2=162 n_q3=315 n_q4=169 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.zH7jGj6ZFY (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=152, bad_region=292, passed=1693 Got 1693 stars (including 1266 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1693 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5851 through 0 to 8.3971, gap 8.3971 to 351.5851 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1415 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5848 through 0 to 8.3973, gap 8.3973 to 351.5848 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1415 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1415 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=309 n_q2=147 n_q3=337 n_q4=163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.081 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.5yLRcTXFiR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=268, bad_region=384, passed=1593 Got 1593 stars (including 996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1593 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5952 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5952 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1250 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5954 through 0 to 8.4410, gap 8.4410 to 351.5954 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1249 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1249 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1041) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=291 n_q2=184 n_q3=288 n_q4=183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.0OCKFMYdvw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=260, bad_region=344, passed=1468 Got 1468 stars (including 914 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1468 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5952 through 0 to 8.4074, gap 8.4074 to 351.5952 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 865 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1157 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5954 through 0 to 8.4080, gap 8.4080 to 351.5954 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1157 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1157 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 867 stars left (next iteration limit 954) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits N_match=867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=257 n_q2=173 n_q3=265 n_q4=172 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.070 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.076 ref2=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.081 new1=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.093 new2=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.070 reference average sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.0785 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055_astrometric_residuals.png (946 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056_astrometric_residuals.png (867 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits Image size: 938.1'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.235 -18:00:12.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64 Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.235 -18:00:12.42 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0096 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:02.525 -18:00:40.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64 Second-epoch image center 00:00:02.525 -18:00:40.60 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0240 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 23:59:59.235 -18:00:12.42 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:02.525 -18:00:40.60 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01521 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LJaZvXVjrx Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w95dWmTCPC Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ie8EXDUAo3 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jF4FW40oM8 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 13800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0008 to 359.9990 deg, Dec -23.2779 to -12.6004 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0008 to 359.9990 deg, Dec -23.2779 to -12.6004 deg Loaded 191688 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3376 out of 3471 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3471 out of 13800 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.127450 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.127450 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.00 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.13 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 13800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0008 to 359.9990 deg, Dec -23.2779 to -12.6004 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0008 to 359.9990 deg, Dec -23.2779 to -12.6004 deg Loaded 191688 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3376 out of 3471 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3471 out of 13800 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (aperture=4.9) Read 11523 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0007 to 359.9972 deg, Dec -23.2771 to -12.5847 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0007 to 359.9972 deg, Dec -23.2771 to -12.5847 deg Loaded 191948 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3404 out of 3475 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3475 out of 11523 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 2.1 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.1 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 13.8 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits 13.8 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.LJaZvXVjrx (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=454, bad_region=1822, passed=13796 Got 13796 stars (including 11610 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13796 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5849 through 0 to 8.4418, gap 8.4418 to 351.5849 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12113 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4420, gap 8.4420 to 351.5847 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12113 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12110 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=308 n_q2=155 n_q3=318 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.w95dWmTCPC (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=313, bad_region=1652, passed=11521 Got 11521 stars (including 9599 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11521 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5851 through 0 to 8.4395, gap 8.4395 to 351.5851 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9971 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5848 through 0 to 8.4397, gap 8.4397 to 351.5848 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9972 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9972 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=316 n_q2=148 n_q3=324 n_q4=164 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ie8EXDUAo3 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=438, bad_region=2190, passed=11304 Got 11304 stars (including 8752 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11304 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5845 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5845 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9424 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5848 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5848 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9425 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9425 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=279 n_q2=201 n_q3=278 n_q4=191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.057 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.jF4FW40oM8 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=380, bad_region=2064, passed=10648 Got 10648 stars (including 8285 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10648 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5846 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5846 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8874 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5849 through 0 to 8.4410, gap 8.4410 to 351.5849 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8874 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8874 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=275 n_q2=205 n_q3=279 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.027 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:11:59.89 -20:21:30.4: 13.70 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:16:32.20 -19:11:02.9: 13.92 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:17:18.27 -22:03:45.8: 13.44 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:13:20.05 -21:37:30.7: 13.71 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:01:32.68 -13:55:50.3: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:19:07.04 -21:53:16.9: 13.74 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:16:46.45 -21:06:43.6: 13.49 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:05:05.95 -13:51:11.5: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:17:34.32 -21:22:20.4: 13.69 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:15:12.60 -21:43:14.6: 13.56 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:17:34.32 -21:22:20.4: 13.48 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:01:32.68 -13:55:50.3: 14.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:15:12.60 -21:43:14.6: 13.75 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:17:18.27 -22:03:45.8: 13.32 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:16:46.45 -21:06:43.6: 13.55 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:11:59.89 -20:21:30.4: 14.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:13:20.05 -21:37:30.7: 14.12 +/- 0.32 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:16:32.20 -19:11:02.9: 13.73 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:19:07.04 -21:53:16.9: 13.88 +/- 0.26 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:05:05.95 -13:51:11.5: 14.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:12.60 -21:43:14.6: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6018 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:20.05 -21:37:30.7: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5673 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:11:59.89 -20:21:30.4: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5698 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:34.32 -21:22:20.4: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4713 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:46.45 -21:06:43.6: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4589 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:18.27 -22:03:45.8: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4253 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:32.20 -19:11:02.9: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5453 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:07.04 -21:53:16.9: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4794 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:16:00.08 -21:58:41.1: 13.78 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:12:36.57 -21:57:55.0: 13.54 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 23:46:34.96 -21:04:38.7: 13.98 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:16:00.08 -21:58:41.1: 13.79 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:12:36.57 -21:57:55.0: 13.92 +/- 0.27 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:00.08 -21:58:41.1: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6262 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:36.57 -21:57:55.0: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7309 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 23:46:34.96 -21:04:38.7: 13.67 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:46:34.96 -21:04:38.7: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6807 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20970.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21736.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20970_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 Preparing report for the candidate 20970_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21736_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 Preparing report for the candidate 21736_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21883_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 The candidate 21883_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.46021    2461242.96021    13.41    00:16:46.47 -21:06:44.2   2421 5116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.46096    2461242.96096    13.53    00:16:46.43 -21:06:43.1   2429 5111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21934_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 The candidate 21934_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.46021    2461242.96021    13.46    00:17:34.32 -21:22:19.9   2312 5278   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.46096    2461242.96096    13.48    00:17:34.33 -21:22:21.0   2320 5273   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22001_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 The candidate 22001_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.46021    2461242.96021    13.56    00:11:59.86 -20:21:30.9   3090 4640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.46096    2461242.96096    13.59    00:11:59.92 -20:21:29.8   3098 4635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22008_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 The candidate 22008_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.46021    2461242.96021    13.54    00:17:18.16 -22:03:45.2   2361 5697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.46096    2461242.96096    13.34    00:17:18.37 -22:03:46.4   2368 5692   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22017_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 The candidate 22017_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.46021    2461242.96021    13.54    00:13:20.04 -21:37:30.8   2916 5414   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.46096    2461242.96096    13.61    00:13:20.06 -21:37:30.6   2923 5409   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22040_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 The candidate 22040_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.46021    2461242.96021    13.50    00:19:07.12 -21:53:16.6   2101 5600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.46096    2461242.96096    13.47    00:19:06.97 -21:53:17.3   2109 5595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22087_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 The candidate 22087_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.46021    2461242.96021    13.56    00:16:32.25 -19:11:03.3   2425 3945   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.46096    2461242.96096    13.53    00:16:32.15 -19:11:02.6   2434 3940   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22121_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 The candidate 22121_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.46021    2461242.96021    13.61    00:15:12.55 -21:43:13.6   2652 5479   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.46096    2461242.96096    13.60    00:15:12.65 -21:43:15.6   2659 5475   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22131_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 The candidate 22131_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.46021    2461242.96021    13.61    00:16:00.16 -21:58:42.7   2543 5640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.46096    2461242.96096    13.64    00:16:00.01 -21:58:39.4   2552 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22147_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 The candidate 22147_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.46021    2461242.96021    13.66    00:12:36.56 -21:57:54.4   3022 5618   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.46096    2461242.96096    13.85    00:12:36.57 -21:57:55.6   3030 5613   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22223_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 The candidate 22223_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.46021    2461242.96021    13.65    23:46:34.92 -21:04:37.7   6691 5068   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-02-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1055.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.46096    2461242.96096    13.72    23:46:34.99 -21:04:39.7   6698 5063   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_072548_TTUQ2b1x1_1590602_b4SbezTa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_06-03-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1056.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 00:01:32.68 -13:55:50.3 00:05:05.95 -13:51:11.5 ########### Completed Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 00:01:32.68 -13:55:50.3 00:05:05.95 -13:51:11.5 ################################################################################### 00:01:32.68 -13:55:50.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:05:05.95 -13:51:11.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461242.96020646 -observatory V36 07:08:09.16 +18:00:03.7 Mercury (2.8mag) 10:56:43.71 +07:35:21.8 Venus (-4.2mag) 04:57:05.53 +22:36:04.6 Mars (1.3mag) 08:26:48.20 +19:38:28.4 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:41.31 +03:22:22.5 Saturn (0.7mag) 04:09:13.42 +20:50:22.9 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:51.21 +00:18:56.9 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:29:51.89 -23:22:52.5 Pluto (14.4mag) 13:37:22.69 -15:18:36.1 Moon (-10.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 21 10:26 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461242.96020646: -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 0 Jul 21 10:26 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461242.96020646: -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 0 Jul 21 10:26 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461242.96020646 -observatory V36 02:51:37.90 +15:41:09.3 17.8mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:10:03.85 -34:35:22.6 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:36:43.51 -68:21:28.0 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:04:33.32 +32:38:34.7 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 02:41:56.92 +25:04:37.2 15.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:52:18.96 +32:10:00.2 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:24:51.50 +26:48:31.8 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:05:20.36 +29:16:42.9 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:16:59.74 +05:10:30.4 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:10:59.76 -11:40:32.3 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:35:00.89 +67:22:05.2 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:10:53.43 -11:13:07.9 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:20:25.43 +66:20:16.2 18.0mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:47:02.60 +30:32:40.3 14.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:11:35.39 +15:32:46.7 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:26:42.57 +41:18:04.9 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:35:02.33 +47:32:26.6 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 04:59:55.76 -13:21:34.4 15.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:43:30.74 +27:12:35.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:21:38.29 -13:58:00.8 17.0mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:09:26.63 +21:55:10.2 17.5mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:48:52.69 +03:24:41.5 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:23:55.26 +79:02:23.1 17.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:56:51.26 +45:41:02.5 16.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:33:01.76 +06:20:31.8 17.1mag A/2026 E1 21:35:44.90 -19:27:53.3 7.0mag 10P/Tempel 11:18:57.42 -02:24:06.3 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:15:54.04 +30:43:36.7 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:31:11.98 +10:26:27.5 17.1mag 63P/Wild 00:52:19.17 -05:03:33.4 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 04:54:06.67 +20:37:21.4 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:39:16.88 +12:01:15.3 16.4mag 88P/Howell 07:07:55.78 +29:42:18.0 15.9mag 93P/Lovas 04:57:26.89 +31:19:34.5 16.6mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:35:47.82 +29:21:01.1 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:09:04.68 -03:17:55.0 16.9mag 124P/Mrkos 05:09:25.05 +21:04:08.7 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 05:56:57.91 +19:32:44.6 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 07:52:23.26 +14:31:06.9 16.9mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:21:10.02 -20:32:32.2 14.9mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:13:09.44 +36:00:43.9 15.5mag 162P/SidingSpring 18:24:55.34 +23:08:37.3 13.8mag 169P/NEAT 02:06:45.61 +08:40:28.3 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:35:48.43 -08:55:02.0 17.3mag 235P/LINEAR 20:35:44.19 -51:38:57.4 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:30:42.22 +17:16:10.2 15.5mag 260P/McNaught 06:11:08.15 +37:32:26.4 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:06:46.72 +05:00:43.6 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski 08:44:39.30 +19:12:25.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:09:03.01 +38:16:49.3 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.4K Jul 21 10:26 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 2026-07-16.17 17.02 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 21 10:26 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 21 10:26 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 23:07:26.336 -12:56:17.54 AT 2026tcs 2026-06-30.41 21.4398 23:35:32.021 -03:51:50.80 AT 2026tcr 2026-06-30.40 21.2107 22:46:06.496 -01:32:52.07 AT 2026tcq 2026-06-30.33 22.4094 23:56:55.894 -03:32:32.42 AT 2026tcp 2026-06-28.41 20.6565 23:56:58.996 -08:52:15.69 AT 2026tco 2026-06-28.38 20.9296 23:54:46.090 -08:57:09.09 AT 2026tcn 2026-06-28.38 21.0773 23:56:22.967 -02:30:21.39 AT 2026tcm 2026-06-28.41 22.0118 00:00:35.535 -08:28:30.01 AT 2026tcl 2026-06-28.38 20.8879 23:47:52.020 -01:07:14.93 AT 2026tck 2026-06-28.35 22.438 23:52:36.644 -03:46:49.40 AT 2026tcj 2026-06-28.35 22.2179 21:42:47.896 -09:01:31.52 AT 2026tci 2026-06-27.33 23.0184 22:55:02.637 -10:40:03.08 AT 2026tch 2026-06-27.42 22.86 20:55:13.637 -21:18:38.78 AT 2026tcg 2026-06-27.33 23.1947 23:10:16.486 +00:53:13.74 AT 2026tcf 2026-06-27.40 22.6048 21:09:09.750 -14:53:41.10 AT 2026tce 2026-06-27.34 23.112 20:14:07.915 -17:46:14.81 AT 2026tcd 2026-06-27.29 23.1617 23:21:50.876 -02:55:18.61 AT 2026tcc 2026-06-27.39 22.5616 23:40:39.509 +02:06:14.04 AT 2026tcb 2026-06-27.43 22.8588 20:38:31.462 -21:36:47.89 AT 2026tca 2026-06-27.35 22.1497 21:12:20.831 -20:40:40.44 AT 2026tbz 2026-06-27.33 21.9251 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 21 10:26 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 92 C