NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-06-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    14.24    00:50:26.71 -07:19:54.9   4548 4790   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    14.24    00:50:26.71 -07:19:54.5   4555 4785   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 21.4267  2461242.9267  14.24  00:50:26.71 -07:19:54.7
122.20513 -70.20221 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
906 Repsolda                -0     -0       0  14.3     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:50:26.71 -07:19:54.7:  15.92 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:50:26.71 -07:19:54.7:  15.71 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-06-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits
Field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1266060 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1266060 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits_preview.png'
Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits

renamed 'Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits_preview.png'
Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 888.8278 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 475.8528 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1391.9434 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 485.7034 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1389.1310 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 485.1170 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.56604 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-21T05:13:43.8732606' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-21T10:13:43.8732606' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61242.4262022339 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-21T10:13:53.7758879' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61242.4263168401 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 12.8533671775078 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99993688968803 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 41.4625 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 149.875555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.50840911172791 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 51 26' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 64.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.71 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 39.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.100088 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits :) Spent 0.838463 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-21T05:14:53.6229506' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-21T10:14:53.6229506' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61242.4270095141 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-21T10:15:03.5272380' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61242.4271241552 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 12.8533670870534 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99993692014109 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 41.5838888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 150.224444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.50481925283484 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 51 26' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 64.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.71 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 39.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.100088 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits :) Spent 0.880208 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits


fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461242.92631797 Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt' wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits' wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:51:25.628 -10:00:20.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:51:26.152 -09:59:57.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:51:25.628 -10:00:20.93 Second-epoch image center 00:51:26.152 -09:59:57.63 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0068 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:51:23.404 -09:59:23.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:51:25.628 -10:00:20.93 Second-epoch image center 00:51:23.404 -09:59:23.79 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0183 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:51:26.152 -09:59:57.63 Second-epoch second image center 00:51:23.404 -09:59:23.79 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01468 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Usp0IVJqDf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oOUuptFN6K Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uFol0AG3UH Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wfeNeR5dUj Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8439 to 21.0407 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5651 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8439 to 21.0407 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5651 deg Loaded 3949 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3149 out of 3275 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3275 out of 5092 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.898500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.898500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.83 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8439 to 21.0407 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5651 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8439 to 21.0407 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5651 deg Loaded 3949 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3149 out of 3275 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3275 out of 5092 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=6.3) Read 4228 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8036 to 21.0407 deg, Dec -15.3227 to -4.5650 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8036 to 21.0407 deg, Dec -15.3227 to -4.5650 deg Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2988 out of 3083 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3083 out of 4228 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 2.0 pix Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 2.9 pix fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits 2.9 pix fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 14.9 mag. Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Usp0IVJqDf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=365, bad_region=0, passed=5092 Got 5092 stars (including 4723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5052 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5051 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5051 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=213 n_q2=276 n_q3=242 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.208 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.oOUuptFN6K (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=309, bad_region=0, passed=4228 Got 4228 stars (including 3912 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4228 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4197 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4198 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4198 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=218 n_q2=279 n_q3=244 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.225 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.uFol0AG3UH (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=217, bad_region=0, passed=4713 Got 4713 stars (including 4492 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4713 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4670 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4669 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4669 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=231 n_q2=241 n_q3=284 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.053 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.wfeNeR5dUj (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=220, bad_region=0, passed=4726 Got 4726 stars (including 4501 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4726 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4687 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4687 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4687 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.220 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=230 n_q2=241 n_q3=283 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.208 ref2=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits sigma_overall=0.340 worst_q_ratio=1.225 new1=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits sigma_overall=0.252 worst_q_ratio=1.053 new2=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits sigma_overall=0.268 worst_q_ratio=1.079 reference average sigma_overall=0.3155 worst_q_ratio=1.2165 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:49:52.17 -06:53:59.9: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:54:52.47 -10:47:03.4: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:07:43.13 -14:11:46.0: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:27:01.81 -06:35:31.1: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:22:03.48 -08:12:32.6: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:49:52.17 -06:53:59.9: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:49:52.17 -06:53:59.9: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1890 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:54:52.47 -10:47:03.4: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:54:52.47 -10:47:03.4: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1190 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:27:01.81 -06:35:31.1: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:07:43.13 -14:11:46.0: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:43.13 -14:11:46.0: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1843 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:01.81 -06:35:31.1: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9283 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:22:03.48 -08:12:32.6: 12.34 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:03.48 -08:12:32.6: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1988 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20151_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 20151_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    11.90    00:27:01.82 -06:35:31.3   1002 5012   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    11.96    00:27:01.80 -06:35:30.9   1009 5007   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20167_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 20167_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    12.12    00:54:52.47 -10:47:03.1   5324 2753   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    12.12    00:54:52.47 -10:47:03.8   5331 2747   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20174_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 20174_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    12.18    01:07:43.11 -14:11:46.1   7321 0785   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    12.19    01:07:43.14 -14:11:45.8   7328 0779   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20176_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 20176_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    12.19    00:22:03.49 -08:12:32.4   0326 3977   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    12.21    00:22:03.46 -08:12:32.8   0333 3972   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20177_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 20177_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    12.19    00:49:52.17 -06:54:00.1   4447 5045   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    12.19    00:49:52.17 -06:53:59.8   4454 5040   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:51:25.628 -10:00:20.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:51:26.152 -09:59:57.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:51:25.628 -10:00:20.93 Second-epoch image center 00:51:26.152 -09:59:57.63 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0068 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:51:23.404 -09:59:23.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:51:25.628 -10:00:20.93 Second-epoch image center 00:51:23.404 -09:59:23.79 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0183 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:51:26.152 -09:59:57.63 Second-epoch second image center 00:51:23.404 -09:59:23.79 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01468 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rsV9B0tZdW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uqQVKJAsiQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits &> /tmp/tmp.krUpJUTAgA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cLy1o52a2B Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 26253 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8322 to 21.0407 deg, Dec -15.3221 to -4.5547 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8322 to 21.0407 deg, Dec -15.3221 to -4.5547 deg Loaded 3953 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3117 out of 3360 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3360 out of 26253 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.789500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.789500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 26253 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8322 to 21.0407 deg, Dec -15.3221 to -4.5547 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8322 to 21.0407 deg, Dec -15.3221 to -4.5547 deg Loaded 3953 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3117 out of 3360 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3360 out of 26253 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 23780 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8036 to 21.0410 deg, Dec -15.3227 to -4.5624 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8036 to 21.0410 deg, Dec -15.3227 to -4.5624 deg Loaded 3956 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3177 out of 3367 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3367 out of 23780 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=4.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 20 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 2.0 pix Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 2.8 pix fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits 2.7 pix fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 15.0 mag. Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.rsV9B0tZdW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1010, bad_region=3, passed=26243 Got 26243 stars (including 25198 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26243 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26099 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26098 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26098 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=217 n_q2=279 n_q3=237 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.uqQVKJAsiQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=847, bad_region=1, passed=23775 Got 23775 stars (including 22882 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23775 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23652 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23651 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23651 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=224 n_q2=276 n_q3=241 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.krUpJUTAgA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=656, bad_region=23, passed=21272 Got 21272 stars (including 20568 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21272 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21107 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21106 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21106 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.229 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=228 n_q2=240 n_q3=283 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.026 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.cLy1o52a2B (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=680, bad_region=25, passed=21412 Got 21412 stars (including 20675 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21412 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21276 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21279 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21279 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.216 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=226 n_q2=241 n_q3=282 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.059 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:03:55.91 -09:08:02.1: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:24:34.63 -08:03:51.0: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:21.80 -06:08:57.3: 13.73 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:31:45.83 -05:09:10.4: 14.01 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:36:28.88 -10:06:23.1: 14.29 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:38:53.95 -07:57:06.7: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:50:26.71 -07:19:54.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:03:55.91 -09:08:02.1: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:03:24.56 -06:32:15.6: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:42:44.59 -09:55:01.2: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:03:55.91 -09:08:02.1: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4393 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:36:28.88 -10:06:23.1: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:36:28.88 -10:06:23.1: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0815 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:24:34.63 -08:03:51.0: 14.99 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:50:26.71 -07:19:54.7: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:34.63 -08:03:51.0: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4322 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:28:11.23 -09:03:59.4: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:21:21.80 -06:08:57.3: 13.52 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:31:45.83 -05:09:10.4: 13.94 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:45.83 -05:09:10.4: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6959 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:38:53.95 -07:57:06.7: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:21.80 -06:08:57.3: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7470 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:38:53.95 -07:57:06.7: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3721 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:42:44.59 -09:55:01.2: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:03:24.56 -06:32:15.6: 13.72 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:42:44.59 -09:55:01.2: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8873 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:03:24.56 -06:32:15.6: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7583 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:28:11.23 -09:03:59.4: 14.81 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:11.23 -09:03:59.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5043 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:29:10.42 -06:03:11.1: 15.26 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:34:13.80 -05:03:30.1: 14.93 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:10:40.11 -12:02:24.3: 14.81 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:29:10.42 -06:03:11.1: 14.89 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:10.42 -06:03:11.1: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6274 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:33:25.75 -09:35:02.7: 15.29 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:32:11.80 -07:34:14.0: 15.14 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:34:13.80 -05:03:30.1: 15.24 +/- 0.28 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:34:32.58 -05:43:24.7: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:34:13.80 -05:03:30.1: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6755 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:37:47.34 -05:29:41.6: 15.09 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:30:19.12 -08:34:58.4: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:10:40.11 -12:02:24.3: 14.47 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:10:40.11 -12:02:24.3: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3983 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:33:25.75 -09:35:02.7: 14.98 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:32:11.80 -07:34:14.0: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:40:57.57 -06:19:17.9: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:33:25.75 -09:35:02.7: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6246 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:11.80 -07:34:14.0: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6623 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:34:32.58 -05:43:24.7: 14.95 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:34:32.58 -05:43:24.7: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5008 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:40:57.57 -06:19:17.9: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:40:57.57 -06:19:17.9: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5177 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:37:47.34 -05:29:41.6: 14.66 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-58-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:30:19.12 -08:34:58.4: 14.75 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:37:47.34 -05:29:41.6: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7864 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:19.12 -08:34:58.4: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5783 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31583.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31166_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31166_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    12.89    00:42:44.59 -09:55:01.2   3500 3165   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    12.88    00:42:44.59 -09:55:01.3   3507 3160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31309_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31309_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    13.45    01:03:55.88 -09:08:01.2   6615 3815   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    13.43    01:03:55.94 -09:08:02.9   6622 3810   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31315_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31315_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    13.60    00:31:45.76 -05:09:10.4   1653 5935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    13.87    00:31:45.91 -05:09:10.4   1661 5930   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31349_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31349_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    13.69    01:03:24.55 -06:32:15.8   6461 5378   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    13.89    01:03:24.57 -06:32:15.3   6468 5373   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31382_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31382_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    13.75    01:21:21.75 -06:08:57.5   9173 5750   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    13.74    01:21:21.85 -06:08:57.0   9181 5744   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31473_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31473_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    13.98    00:36:28.83 -10:06:25.0   2578 2989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    14.30    00:36:28.94 -10:06:21.1   2585 2984   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31497_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31497_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    14.10    00:40:54.13 -07:13:48.9   3127 4759   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits **** FOUND 00:40:54.10 -07:13:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31583_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 Preparing report for the candidate 31583_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31588_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31588_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    14.28    00:38:53.87 -07:57:07.4   2849 4310   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    14.53    00:38:54.03 -07:57:06.1   2857 4305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31667_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31667_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    14.43    00:24:34.57 -08:03:51.6   0701 4093   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    14.43    00:24:34.70 -08:03:50.3   0708 4088   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31676_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31676_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    14.42    00:28:11.24 -09:03:57.8   1293 3527   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    14.63    00:28:11.22 -09:04:01.1   1300 3521   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31698_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31698_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    14.63    00:34:13.84 -05:03:29.7   2023 6017   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    14.82    00:34:13.77 -05:03:30.5   2030 6011   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31733_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31733_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    14.62    00:29:10.39 -06:03:11.9   1302 5362   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    14.64    00:29:10.44 -06:03:10.3   1309 5357   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31738_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31738_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    14.38    01:10:40.05 -12:02:23.8   7698 2108   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    14.41    01:10:40.17 -12:02:24.8   7705 2103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31741_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31741_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    14.52    00:33:25.81 -09:35:02.9   2101 3272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    14.82    00:33:25.69 -09:35:02.4   2108 3266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31757_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31757_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    14.61    00:32:11.78 -07:34:13.7   1828 4473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    14.73    00:32:11.83 -07:34:14.4   1835 4468   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31760_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31760_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    14.64    00:34:32.57 -05:43:26.5   2100 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    14.41    00:34:32.60 -05:43:22.9   2107 5610   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31769_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31769_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    14.65    00:40:57.58 -06:19:18.5   3091 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    14.44    00:40:57.55 -06:19:17.2   3098 5309   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31771_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31771_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    14.63    00:30:19.17 -08:34:57.9   1591 3842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    14.54    00:30:19.07 -08:34:58.9   1598 3837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31772_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 The candidate 31772_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 21.42632    2461242.92632    14.69    00:37:47.32 -05:29:41.6   2580 5785   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-13-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0849.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 21.42713    2461242.92713    14.95    00:37:47.36 -05:29:41.5   2587 5780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_061451_TTUQ1b1x1_1093477_XR9KPzzt/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-14-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0850.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 15s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 00:50:26.71 -07:19:54.7 ########### Completed Cet-06-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 00:50:26.71 -07:19:54.7 ################################################################################### 00:50:26.71 -07:19:54.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461242.92631797 -observatory V36 07:08:10.85 +17:59:42.0 Mercury (2.8mag) 10:56:35.61 +07:36:19.8 Venus (-4.2mag) 04:56:59.52 +22:35:53.7 Mars (1.3mag) 08:26:46.33 +19:38:34.6 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:41.23 +03:22:22.5 Saturn (0.7mag) 04:09:13.08 +20:50:22.0 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:51.26 +00:18:57.4 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:29:52.10 -23:22:51.7 Pluto (14.4mag) 13:35:13.68 -15:09:46.3 Moon (-10.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 21 06:18 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461242.92631797: 08:26:51.10 +19:38:15.4 Io (6.0mag) 08:26:55.20 +19:38:00.8 Europa (6.3mag) 08:26:31.76 +19:39:33.2 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:26:42.73 +19:38:53.6 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:24:49.75 +19:27:52.0 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:26:50.80 +19:38:17.6 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:24:11.58 +19:29:56.7 Elara (17.7mag) 08:30:36.72 +19:26:53.3 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:31:05.11 +19:45:23.3 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:38.64 +03:22:51.0 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:45.98 +03:22:12.0 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:56:08.92 +03:19:53.7 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:56:37.54 +03:21:47.0 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:27.13 +03:18:00.2 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 21 06:19 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461242.92631797: 18:05:12.26 -30:06:22.6 JWST 17:17:51.67 +38:54:26.3 Chandra 10:58:12.54 -59:33:50.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 21 06:18 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461242.92631797 -observatory V36 02:51:35.21 +15:40:56.2 17.8mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:10:05.14 -34:35:21.4 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:36:41.50 -68:21:25.0 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:04:32.66 +32:38:32.3 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 02:41:48.80 +25:02:21.9 15.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:52:20.41 +32:10:02.9 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:24:49.27 +26:48:33.2 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:05:18.52 +29:16:48.4 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:16:58.38 +05:10:28.9 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:10:59.75 -11:40:28.8 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:35:03.68 +67:22:10.5 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:10:56.68 -11:12:55.8 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:20:21.67 +66:20:08.7 18.0mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:47:00.05 +30:32:34.4 14.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:11:36.12 +15:32:45.2 17.6mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:26:45.33 +41:17:47.6 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:35:04.86 +47:32:11.7 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 04:59:53.93 -13:21:38.2 15.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:43:29.16 +27:12:55.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:21:37.04 -13:57:47.7 17.0mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:09:24.06 +21:55:16.4 17.5mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:48:51.78 +03:24:47.9 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:23:59.45 +79:02:27.9 17.1mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:56:49.61 +45:40:57.9 16.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:33:00.26 +06:20:14.1 17.1mag A/2026 E1 21:35:42.23 -19:27:01.3 7.0mag 10P/Tempel 11:18:56.34 -02:24:00.1 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:15:51.24 +30:43:24.0 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:31:07.73 +10:27:07.0 17.1mag 63P/Wild 00:52:18.66 -05:03:32.6 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 04:54:01.83 +20:37:18.0 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:39:14.05 +12:01:01.2 16.4mag 88P/Howell 07:07:50.00 +29:42:28.9 15.9mag 93P/Lovas 04:57:20.16 +31:19:35.3 16.6mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:35:42.85 +29:21:17.3 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:09:00.75 -03:17:06.3 16.9mag 124P/Mrkos 05:09:21.86 +21:04:06.5 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 05:56:54.18 +19:32:47.3 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 07:52:16.56 +14:31:35.2 16.9mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:21:09.57 -20:32:39.6 14.9mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:13:02.10 +36:00:25.0 15.5mag 162P/SidingSpring 18:25:05.60 +23:06:53.0 13.8mag 169P/NEAT 02:06:41.15 +08:40:18.6 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:35:48.17 -08:54:55.2 17.3mag 235P/LINEAR 20:35:45.79 -51:38:40.6 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:30:36.47 +17:15:13.7 15.5mag 260P/McNaught 06:11:01.91 +37:32:20.9 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:06:46.52 +05:00:55.7 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski 08:44:37.44 +19:12:30.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:08:59.87 +38:16:59.6 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.4K Jul 21 06:18 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 2026-07-16.17 17.02 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 21 06:18 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 21 06:18 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 23:07:26.336 -12:56:17.54 AT 2026tcs 2026-06-30.41 21.4398 23:35:32.021 -03:51:50.80 AT 2026tcr 2026-06-30.40 21.2107 22:46:06.496 -01:32:52.07 AT 2026tcq 2026-06-30.33 22.4094 23:56:55.894 -03:32:32.42 AT 2026tcp 2026-06-28.41 20.6565 23:56:58.996 -08:52:15.69 AT 2026tco 2026-06-28.38 20.9296 23:54:46.090 -08:57:09.09 AT 2026tcn 2026-06-28.38 21.0773 23:56:22.967 -02:30:21.39 AT 2026tcm 2026-06-28.41 22.0118 00:00:35.535 -08:28:30.01 AT 2026tcl 2026-06-28.38 20.8879 23:47:52.020 -01:07:14.93 AT 2026tck 2026-06-28.35 22.438 23:52:36.644 -03:46:49.40 AT 2026tcj 2026-06-28.35 22.2179 21:42:47.896 -09:01:31.52 AT 2026tci 2026-06-27.33 23.0184 22:55:02.637 -10:40:03.08 AT 2026tch 2026-06-27.42 22.86 20:55:13.637 -21:18:38.78 AT 2026tcg 2026-06-27.33 23.1947 23:10:16.486 +00:53:13.74 AT 2026tcf 2026-06-27.40 22.6048 21:09:09.750 -14:53:41.10 AT 2026tce 2026-06-27.34 23.112 20:14:07.915 -17:46:14.81 AT 2026tcd 2026-06-27.29 23.1617 23:21:50.876 -02:55:18.61 AT 2026tcc 2026-06-27.39 22.5616 23:40:39.509 +02:06:14.04 AT 2026tcb 2026-06-27.43 22.8588 20:38:31.462 -21:36:47.89 AT 2026tca 2026-06-27.35 22.1497 21:12:20.831 -20:40:40.44 AT 2026tbz 2026-06-27.33 21.9251 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 21 06:18 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 90 C