This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4442 2461242.9442 9.12 05:22:10.28 +21:23:30.5
183.50760 -8.53140 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 0 0 0 9.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:22:10.28 +21:23:30.5: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:22:10.28 +21:23:30.5: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.4443* 05 22 10.28 +21 23 30.5 9.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.9442,9.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.4442 9.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4442 2461242.9442 11.39 05:18:45.22 +22:28:00.3
182.15830 -8.58976 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe -0 -0 0 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:18:45.22 +22:28:00.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:18:45.22 +22:28:00.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.4443* 05 18 45.22 +22 28 00.3 11.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.9442,11.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.4442 11.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4442 2461242.9442 12.06 05:29:53.92 +24:36:09.4
181.79218 -5.28009 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania -0 -0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:29:53.92 +24:36:09.4: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:29:53.92 +24:36:09.4: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.4443* 05 29 53.92 +24 36 09.4 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.9442,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.4442 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4442 2461242.9442 13.12 05:49:43.28 +26:15:24.1
182.76312 -0.60869 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate -0 2 2 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:49:43.28 +26:15:24.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:43.28 +26:15:24.1: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.4443* 05 49 43.28 +26 15 24.1 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.9442,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.4442 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4442 2461242.9442 13.63 05:08:07.93 +21:47:05.2
181.30481 -10.99981 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.2" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.76 Freia 0 -0 0 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:08:07.93 +21:47:05.2: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:08:07.93 +21:47:05.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.4443* 05 08 07.93 +21 47 05.2 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.9442,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.4442 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4442 2461242.9442 13.66 05:12:44.45 +23:37:24.1
180.40009 -9.07202 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.179 Klytaemnestra -0 -1 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:12:44.45 +23:37:24.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:12:44.45 +23:37:24.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.4443* 05 12 44.45 +23 37 24.1 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.9442,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.4442 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4442 2461242.9442 13.93 05:19:10.33 +23:52:38.9
181.03452 -7.71687 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.6" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.322 Phaeo -0 1 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:19:10.33 +23:52:38.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:10.33 +23:52:38.9: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.4443* 05 19 10.33 +23 52 38.9 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.9442,13.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.4442 13.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4442 2461242.9442 13.09 05:30:18.06 +20:22:06.5
185.42126 -7.50074 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 0.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" V1217 Tau
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
> 14.900 V < 21.000 V 2456357.00000 451.000000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:30:18.06 +20:22:06.5: 14.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:18.06 +20:22:06.5: 14.78 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.4443* 05 30 18.06 +20 22 06.5 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1217 Tau,2461242.9442,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1217 Tau 20260721.4442 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4442 2461242.9442 12.80 05:18:28.34 +21:01:06.2
183.33586 -9.45549 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana 4 1 4 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:18:28.34 +21:01:06.2: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:18:28.34 +21:01:06.2: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.4443* 05 18 28.34 +21 01 06.2 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.9442,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.4442 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4442 2461242.9442 12.51 05:48:29.12 +24:10:00.4
184.41183 -1.92364 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 1.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 6945160
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.400 R1 11.300 R1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:48:29.12 +24:10:00.4: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:48:29.12 +24:10:00.4: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.4443* 05 48 29.12 +24 10 00.4 12.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 6945160,2461242.9442,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 6945160 20260721.4442 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4442 2461242.9442 11.96 05:05:59.67 +22:15:05.9
180.62445 -11.13239 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope -0 -0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:05:59.67 +22:15:05.9: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:05:59.67 +22:15:05.9: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.4443* 05 05 59.67 +22 15 05.9 12.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.9442,11.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.4442 11.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4442 2461242.9442 12.71 05:56:11.10 +21:51:41.1
187.29913 -1.57120 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 1.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS J0556106+215128
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.266 g Y 2.688 g 2458371.00590 381.448484800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:56:11.10 +21:51:41.1: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:56:11.10 +21:51:41.1: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 21.4443* 05 56 11.10 +21 51 41.1 12.7 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0556106+215128,2461242.9442,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0556106+215128 20260721.4442 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
First image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Last image: 2461242.94449116 21.07.2026 10:39:54.036 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19103
Objects passed selection criteria: 19011
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13723
Average stars matched: 13195.2 (96.1543 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 127772 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 21 06:19:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
First image: 2461058.59907050 18.01.2026 02:22:29.691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Last image: 2461242.94449116 21.07.2026 10:39:54.036 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 200
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 123 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 137825
Objects passed selection criteria: 137512
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 102740
Average stars matched: 95759.8 (93.2055 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1960324 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 21 06:27:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461242.94400280
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits'
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:15.517 +22:01:05.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:15.517 +22:01:05.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0198 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:15.948 +22:01:10.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:15.948 +22:01:10.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0196 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:15.517 +22:01:05.27
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:15.948 +22:01:10.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00230 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RJLSTVD5gT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SJ4RggO6Hl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U0KgUueCQf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OqALRrFZ08
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 21750 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1679 to 91.6836 deg, Dec +16.3329 to +27.3623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1679 to 91.6836 deg, Dec 16.3329 to 27.3623 deg
Loaded 12332 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9225 out of 10163 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10163 out of 21750 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.923400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.923400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 21750 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1679 to 91.6836 deg, Dec +16.3329 to +27.3623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1679 to 91.6836 deg, Dec 16.3329 to 27.3623 deg
Loaded 12332 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9225 out of 10163 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10163 out of 21750 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3785 to 91.9053 deg, Dec +16.4883 to +27.3012 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3785 to 91.9053 deg, Dec 16.4883 to 27.3012 deg
Loaded 12326 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8851 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RJLSTVD5gT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2103, bad_region=0, passed=21750
Got 21750 stars (including 19623 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21750 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20481 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=153 n_q2=330 n_q3=123 n_q4=321 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SJ4RggO6Hl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=262 n_q2=157 n_q3=293 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.U0KgUueCQf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=432, bad_region=0, passed=6333
Got 6333 stars (including 5895 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6333 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits N_match=926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.639 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.466 n_q1=190 n_q2=257 n_q3=165 n_q4=314 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.293
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OqALRrFZ08 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=427, bad_region=0, passed=6269
Got 6269 stars (including 5836 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6269 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5996 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5994 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5994 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits N_match=919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.446 n_q1=187 n_q2=260 n_q3=160 n_q4=312 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.472 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits sigma_overall=0.494 worst_q_ratio=1.293
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits sigma_overall=0.468 worst_q_ratio=1.299
reference average sigma_overall=0.4225 worst_q_ratio=1.2035
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036_astrometric_residuals.png (927 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873_astrometric_residuals.png (926 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874_astrometric_residuals.png (919 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:22:10.28 +21:23:30.5: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:18:45.22 +22:28:00.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:22:10.28 +21:23:30.5: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:18:45.22 +22:28:00.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31945.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32044.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31945_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
Preparing report for the candidate 31945_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31977_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 31977_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:42.80 +23:02:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32044_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
Preparing report for the candidate 32044_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07111_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 07111_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.85 +20:10:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 02586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.51 +17:54:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 04120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:00.31 +18:21:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:22:10.28 +21:23:30.5
05:18:45.22 +22:28:00.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:15.517 +22:01:05.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:15.517 +22:01:05.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0198 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:15.948 +22:01:10.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.516 +22:00:20.87
Second-epoch image center 05:32:15.948 +22:01:10.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0196 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:15.517 +22:01:05.27
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:15.948 +22:01:10.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00230 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f0QdBsU3Zi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BgkPh6cNkR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits &> /tmp/tmp.neccEcWp6q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x86uLhfE4R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 149155 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1101 to 91.6891 deg, Dec +16.3191 to +27.3626 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1101 to 91.6891 deg, Dec 16.3191 to 27.3626 deg
Loaded 12382 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7632 out of 10495 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10495 out of 149155 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.783950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.783950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 149155 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1101 to 91.6891 deg, Dec +16.3191 to +27.3626 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1101 to 91.6891 deg, Dec 16.3191 to 27.3626 deg
Loaded 12382 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7632 out of 10495 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10495 out of 149155 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3382 to 91.9466 deg, Dec +16.4852 to +27.3055 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3382 to 91.9466 deg, Dec 16.4852 to 27.3055 deg
Loaded 12416 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7186 out of 10476 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10476 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 176 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
1.8 pix wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.f0QdBsU3Zi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=40, blended=17632, bad_region=2, passed=149115
Got 149115 stars (including 131218 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 149115 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=164 n_q2=329 n_q3=120 n_q4=315 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BgkPh6cNkR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 158432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 158434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 158435 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=266 n_q2=157 n_q3=284 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.neccEcWp6q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2057, bad_region=1, passed=51233
Got 51233 stars (including 49100 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51233 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits N_match=918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.674 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.438 n_q1=194 n_q2=252 n_q3=165 n_q4=307 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.383
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.x86uLhfE4R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2168, bad_region=1, passed=50337
Got 50337 stars (including 48091 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50337 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=194 n_q2=253 n_q3=164 n_q4=304 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.282
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0873.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_060851_TTUQ1b1x1_635825_qc1SVJBf/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:28:06.56 +23:22:59.0: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:28:06.56 +23:22:59.0: 14.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:09:07.92 +21:52:55.7: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:12:57.82 +19:26:31.7: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:28:06.56 +23:22:59.0: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6781 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:31:56.40 +22:45:17.5: 11.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:25:56.02 +18:37:51.2: 11.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:07.92 +21:52:55.7: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:07.92 +21:52:55.7: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5000 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:12:57.82 +19:26:31.7: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:57.82 +19:26:31.7: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1332 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:25:56.02 +18:37:51.2: 11.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:56.40 +22:45:17.5: 11.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.27 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:56.40 +22:45:17.5: ref_mag=11.27 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6678 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:56.02 +18:37:51.2: ref_mag=11.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5080 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:02:49.68 +17:04:28.0: 9.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:03:17.70 +17:03:31.4: 9.57 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:01:52.70 +16:54:16.7: 9.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:49.68 +17:04:28.0: 9.80 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.76 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:49.68 +17:04:28.0: ref_mag=9.76 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1849 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:17.70 +17:03:31.4: 9.64 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.61 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:17.70 +17:03:31.4: ref_mag=9.61 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1451 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:13:01.05 +24:23:37.6: 11.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:52.70 +16:54:16.7: 9.92 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.88 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:00:42.64 +17:08:20.6: 10.12 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:52.70 +16:54:16.7: ref_mag=9.88 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3083 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:03:09.11 +17:05:15.6: 10.29 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:01.05 +24:23:37.6: 11.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.13 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:00:42.64 +17:08:20.6: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:01.05 +24:23:37.6: ref_mag=11.13 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3255 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.15 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:42.64 +17:08:20.6: ref_mag=10.15 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5855 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:09.11 +17:05:15.6: 10.36 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.33 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:09.11 +17:05:15.6: ref_mag=10.33 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6173 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:00:56.81 +17:07:28.4: 10.66 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:01:56.34 +16:52:42.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:00:56.81 +17:07:28.4: 10.72 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.69 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:56.81 +17:07:28.4: ref_mag=10.69 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8458 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:02:59.11 +17:09:35.9: 10.60 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:01:38.72 +17:09:33.5: 11.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:56.34 +16:52:42.9: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:56.34 +16:52:42.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:59.11 +17:09:35.9: 10.65 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.63 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:59.11 +17:09:35.9: ref_mag=10.63 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0641 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:02:34.83 +17:04:56.1: 10.91 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:38.72 +17:09:33.5: 11.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.16 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:38.72 +17:09:33.5: ref_mag=11.16 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2857 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:01:39.92 +17:07:20.2: 11.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:29:53.92 +24:36:09.4: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:34.83 +17:04:56.1: 10.96 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.94 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:34.83 +17:04:56.1: ref_mag=10.94 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3475 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:29:53.92 +24:36:09.4: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:39.92 +17:07:20.2: 11.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.16 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:39.92 +17:07:20.2: ref_mag=11.16 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4866 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:02:58.34 +17:03:47.4: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:01:41.94 +16:58:04.7: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:03:29.78 +16:56:16.9: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:58.34 +17:03:47.4: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:58.34 +17:03:47.4: ref_mag=11.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8392 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:41.94 +16:58:04.7: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:41.94 +16:58:04.7: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9416 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:29.78 +16:56:16.9: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:29.78 +16:56:16.9: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9636 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:02:20.86 +16:52:16.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:02:22.91 +17:19:25.8: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:20.86 +16:52:16.3: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:20.86 +16:52:16.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:22.91 +17:19:25.8: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:22.91 +17:19:25.8: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1912 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:31:40.05 +18:13:13.5: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:03:53.82 +18:05:53.5: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:02:20.70 +17:10:08.3: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:39:06.14 +19:47:05.6: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:53.82 +18:05:53.5: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:40.05 +18:13:13.5: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:53.82 +18:05:53.5: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2966 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:40.05 +18:13:13.5: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6268 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:20.70 +17:10:08.3: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:20.70 +17:10:08.3: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3681 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:39:06.14 +19:47:05.6: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:06.14 +19:47:05.6: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6478 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:03:35.81 +17:28:26.1: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:50:20.37 +18:57:34.8: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:35.81 +17:28:26.1: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:35.81 +17:28:26.1: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4805 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:20.37 +18:57:34.8: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:20.37 +18:57:34.8: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5957 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:09:56.10 +21:49:35.9: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:01:08.18 +17:04:17.3: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:40:12.74 +24:31:53.8: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:56.10 +21:49:35.9: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:56.10 +21:49:35.9: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2782 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:08.18 +17:04:17.3: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:08.18 +17:04:17.3: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4334 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:40:12.74 +24:31:53.8: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:12.74 +24:31:53.8: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9395 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:03:24.91 +17:45:10.9: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:24:12.95 +20:07:34.0: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:30:41.25 +22:21:33.5: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:12.95 +20:07:34.0: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:12.95 +20:07:34.0: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0938 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:24.91 +17:45:10.9: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:24.91 +17:45:10.9: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4698 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:41.25 +22:21:33.5: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:41.25 +22:21:33.5: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1443 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:35:02.34 +24:18:48.2: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:35:37.02 +21:22:57.9: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:35:02.34 +24:18:48.2: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:02.34 +24:18:48.2: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1707 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:49:43.28 +26:15:24.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:08:07.93 +21:47:05.2: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:12:44.45 +23:37:24.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:35:37.02 +21:22:57.9: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:37.02 +21:22:57.9: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1684 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:43.28 +26:15:24.1: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:08:07.93 +21:47:05.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:12:44.45 +23:37:24.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:19:10.33 +23:52:38.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:10.33 +23:52:38.9: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:30:18.06 +20:22:06.5: 14.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:18.06 +20:22:06.5: 14.78 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:18:28.34 +21:01:06.2: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:30:18.06 +20:22:06.5: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.0849 delta=1.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:18:28.34 +21:01:06.2: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:18:28.34 +21:01:06.2: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8070 delta=1.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:48:29.12 +24:10:00.4: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:05:59.67 +22:15:05.9: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:48:29.12 +24:10:00.4: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:48:29.12 +24:10:00.4: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5042 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:05:59.67 +22:15:05.9: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 06:03:20.79 +16:42:22.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-22-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0036.fits at 05:56:11.10 +21:51:41.1: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:56:11.10 +21:51:41.1: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:56:11.10 +21:51:41.1: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7060 delta=1.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:20.79 +16:42:22.5: 10.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:20.79 +16:42:22.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out139712.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out185917.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186678.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186721.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186725.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186801.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53727.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65407.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74760.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87724.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 26s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 11s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185541_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185541_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185552_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185552_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:21.93 +23:00:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185556_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185556_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:57.14 +21:51:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185557_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185557_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:06.29 +17:57:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185559_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185559_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:58.00 +22:41:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185561_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185561_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.22 +18:20:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185562_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185562_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:04.95 +22:16:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185565_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185565_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185571_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185571_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185574_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185574_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:36.85 +21:10:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:14.68 +26:31:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.85 +16:55:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185583_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185583_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185589_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185589_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185591_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185591_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:39.78 +16:56:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185603_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185603_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:05.81 +16:59:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185610_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185610_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:10.29 +21:23:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185620_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185620_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:49.37 +17:25:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185622_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185622_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:14.55 +16:55:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:23.93 +17:28:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185656_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185656_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:25.99 +17:24:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:43.06 +17:23:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185660_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185660_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:09.03 +17:17:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185665_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185665_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:23.54 +17:26:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185674_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185674_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:42.78 +23:02:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185677_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185677_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:49.42 +17:50:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185680_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185680_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185681_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185681_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185684_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185684_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:10.67 +17:12:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185689_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185689_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185698_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185698_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:23.42 +16:56:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185701_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185701_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185711_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185711_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:11.78 +16:56:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185714_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185714_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:15.11 +17:19:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185723_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185723_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185724_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185724_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185728_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185728_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:22.09 +17:11:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185736_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185736_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185742_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185742_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:45.18 +22:28:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185746_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185746_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185747_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185747_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:16.62 +16:52:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185758_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185758_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:24.12 +17:26:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185759_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185759_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:56.95 +17:34:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185774_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185774_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185775_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185775_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185782_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185782_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185792_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185792_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:51.99 +19:58:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185798_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185798_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:37.94 +17:05:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185818_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185818_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185820_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185820_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:03.57 +17:16:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185825_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185825_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:43.28 +17:19:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185827_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185827_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185847_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185847_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185851_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185851_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:19.48 +16:54:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185857_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185857_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:30.56 +17:46:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185870_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185870_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185874_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185874_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185883_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185883_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185888_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185888_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:24.41 +17:25:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185897_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185897_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:44.97 +17:20:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185904_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185904_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:51.13 +17:23:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185917_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
Preparing report for the candidate 185917_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185938_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185938_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185946_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185946_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:01.54 +16:56:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:17.05 +17:02:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185981_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185981_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:14.47 +25:25:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185986_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185986_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:29.47 +17:34:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185990_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185990_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:14.44 +17:15:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185993_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185993_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:00.50 +17:24:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185998_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 185998_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:20.01 +17:53:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186005_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186005_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.10 +22:38:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186017_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186017_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:44.01 +16:56:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:02.96 +23:18:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186041_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186041_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.70 +22:27:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186044_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186044_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:25.98 +16:56:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.83 +23:48:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186056_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186056_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:05.21 +17:18:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186079_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186079_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186081_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186081_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186103_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186103_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186130_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186130_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186136_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186136_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:14.37 +23:18:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186139_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186139_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.96 +26:25:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186146_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186146_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:51.85 +16:54:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186157_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186157_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:01.82 +26:45:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186169_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186169_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.73 +19:34:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:08.41 +17:08:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186210_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186210_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186213_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186213_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186227_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186227_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:15.00 +23:03:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186233_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186233_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.84 +18:33:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186237_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186237_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:36.24 +17:43:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186242_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186242_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.88 +25:05:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186247_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186247_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.59 +20:46:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186256_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186256_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:24.37 +18:37:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186263_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186263_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:20.91 +23:48:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186264_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186264_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186275_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186275_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:54.82 +23:41:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186277_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186277_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186294_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186294_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.92 +20:10:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186305_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186305_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.57 +21:37:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186314_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186314_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186318_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186318_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.26 +18:52:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186328_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186328_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.99 +17:03:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186333_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186333_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186349_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186349_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.39 +18:33:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186350_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186350_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186355_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186355_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.76 +22:40:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186368_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186368_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186374_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186374_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:13.63 +21:51:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186381_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186381_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:55.96 +24:36:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186383_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186383_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.83 +26:10:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186393_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186393_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186399_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186399_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.17 +23:00:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186408_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186408_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:58.32 +16:55:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186433_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186433_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.28 +18:59:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186442_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186442_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:40.11 +20:26:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186445_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186445_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.19 +19:48:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186447_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186447_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:54.26 +26:06:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186460_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186460_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:36.57 +22:27:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186468_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186468_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186477_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186477_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186484_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186484_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.54 +21:46:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186487_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186487_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186489_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186489_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:22.80 +26:26:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186494_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186494_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.09 +23:12:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186503_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186503_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:39.95 +16:57:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186504_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186504_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:28.65 +17:04:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186525_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186525_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.75 +22:03:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186541_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186541_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186542_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186542_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186545_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186545_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:57.55 +16:51:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186568_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186568_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:04.77 +18:36:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186570_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186570_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186574_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186574_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:52.85 +23:55:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.55 +20:02:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186595_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186595_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.32 +24:25:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:02.49 +18:29:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186620_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186620_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.87 +19:32:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186645_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186645_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186662_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186662_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.29 +20:56:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186678_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
Preparing report for the candidate 186678_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186709_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186709_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186721_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
Preparing report for the candidate 186721_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186725_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
Preparing report for the candidate 186725_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186727_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186727_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.55 +20:05:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186754_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186754_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.31 +20:09:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186778_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186778_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.87 +17:11:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186793_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 186793_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186801_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
Preparing report for the candidate 186801_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25904_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 25904_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:00.32 +18:21:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51802_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 51802_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.47 +20:22:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162756_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 162756_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:14.78 +17:14:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53727_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
Preparing report for the candidate 53727_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65407_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
Preparing report for the candidate 65407_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42236_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 42236_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:09.69 +19:28:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38285_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 38285_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.75 +19:21:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04796_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 04796_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139712_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
Preparing report for the candidate 139712_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87724_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
Preparing report for the candidate 87724_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15870_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 15870_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.50 +17:54:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23197_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 23197_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:37.84 +18:24:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129436_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 129436_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:08.10 +24:51:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72931_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 72931_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:50.46 +21:45:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74929_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 74929_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:53.49 +21:35:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47289_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 47289_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.85 +20:10:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74760_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
Preparing report for the candidate 74760_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164069_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 164069_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163987_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874
The candidate 163987_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-39-54_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0874 did not pass the final checks
