This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4498 2461242.9498 11.75 05:48:41.55 +33:33:42.8
176.38055 2.95622 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia 0 -1 1 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:48:41.55 +33:33:42.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:48:41.55 +33:33:42.8: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.9498,11.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.4498 11.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4498 2461242.9498 13.19 05:44:08.46 +31:26:23.7
177.69786 1.03516 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.141 Lumen -1 -1 1 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:08.46 +31:26:23.7: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:08.46 +31:26:23.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461242.9498,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260721.4498 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4498 2461242.9498 11.73 06:21:56.79 +30:53:15.4
182.14432 7.82055 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0621568+305322
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.059 g Y 0.998 g 2458512.09310 123.694474500000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:21:56.79 +30:53:15.4: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:21:56.79 +30:53:15.4: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0621568+305322,2461242.9498,11.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0621568+305322 20260721.4498 11.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 21.4498 2461242.9498 12.66 05:43:37.08 +33:54:12.4
175.54049 2.23132 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 4.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V0567 Aur
Type: EW
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.700 V 13.400 V 2451548.62400 0.710087000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:43:37.08 +33:54:12.4: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:43:37.08 +33:54:12.4: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0567 Aur,2461242.9498,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0567 Aur 20260721.4498 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461242.95009465 21.07.2026 10:47:58.178 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25184
Objects passed selection criteria: 25000
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16082.2
Average stars matched: 15578 (96.8646 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 132564 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 21 09:46:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461242.95009465 21.07.2026 10:47:58.178 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 122
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 51 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 193114
Objects passed selection criteria: 192507
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 129388
Average stars matched: 124249 (96.0284 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2150952 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 19 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-159-g2d8c46ea
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 21 09:54:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461242.94955181
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:53.367 +30:00:35.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 05:59:53.367 +30:00:35.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0284 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:51.639 +30:00:51.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 05:59:51.639 +30:00:51.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0359 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:53.367 +30:00:35.90
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:51.639 +30:00:51.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00752 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.61moo8Xz3d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6JvGaQmUIi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IXz9vbzdLS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jRF1MonpiC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec +24.3425 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec 24.3425 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17091 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11926 out of 13489 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13489 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec +24.3425 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5801 to 99.6659 deg, Dec 24.3425 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17091 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11926 out of 13489 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13489 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5948 to 99.6661 deg, Dec +24.3432 to +35.3120 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5948 to 99.6661 deg, Dec 24.3432 to 35.3120 deg
Loaded 17084 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12065 out of 13603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13603 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.61moo8Xz3d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=0, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 24022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=182 n_q2=276 n_q3=215 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.055
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6JvGaQmUIi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=0, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 23994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26213 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=187 n_q2=281 n_q3=208 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IXz9vbzdLS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=445, bad_region=0, passed=5261
Got 5261 stars (including 4807 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5261 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.570 n_q1=229 n_q2=190 n_q3=310 n_q4=201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jRF1MonpiC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=438, bad_region=0, passed=5122
Got 5122 stars (including 4677 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5122 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.517 n_q1=237 n_q2=192 n_q3=303 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.513 worst_q_ratio=1.055
ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.486 worst_q_ratio=1.136
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits sigma_overall=0.475 worst_q_ratio=1.199
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits sigma_overall=0.469 worst_q_ratio=1.245
reference average sigma_overall=0.4995 worst_q_ratio=1.0955
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881_astrometric_residuals.png (930 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882_astrometric_residuals.png (928 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.14 +31:35:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.07 +28:29:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.75 +31:24:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:53.367 +30:00:35.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 05:59:53.367 +30:00:35.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0284 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:51.639 +30:00:51.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.480 +29:59:52.07
Second-epoch image center 05:59:51.639 +30:00:51.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0359 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:53.367 +30:00:35.90
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:51.639 +30:00:51.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00752 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yWTqiMC7Vg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wOCMnmVh64
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3vUsYd685T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xT2pAELQMX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17188 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9142 out of 14161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14161 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5608 to 99.6889 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3069 deg
Loaded 17188 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9142 out of 14161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14161 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec +24.3258 to +35.3145 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5698 to 99.6891 deg, Dec 24.3258 to 35.3145 deg
Loaded 17176 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9258 out of 14259 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14259 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 106 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.yWTqiMC7Vg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=79, blended=32424, bad_region=1, passed=212748
Got 212748 stars (including 179989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.462 n_q1=199 n_q2=266 n_q3=222 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wOCMnmVh64 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=32176, bad_region=4, passed=212590
Got 212590 stars (including 180083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 207885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 207885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 207884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=198 n_q2=272 n_q3=210 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3vUsYd685T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=2064, bad_region=0, passed=48359
Got 48359 stars (including 46226 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48359 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits N_match=925 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.550 n_q1=240 n_q2=183 n_q3=304 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xT2pAELQMX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1970, bad_region=0, passed=46667
Got 46667 stars (including 44629 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46667 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45439 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits N_match=925 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=242 n_q2=185 n_q3=295 n_q4=203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.285
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0881.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-21_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_060701_TTUQ1b1x1_558413_jruClOEf/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:05:32.63 +28:21:16.9: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:26.99 +26:06:07.6: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:51:19.79 +32:13:35.9: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:41:11.89 +26:16:28.0: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:22.01 +32:31:09.2: 11.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:27:29.91 +29:01:21.7: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:26.99 +26:06:07.6: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:32.63 +28:21:16.9: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:26.99 +26:06:07.6: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6415 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:51:19.79 +32:13:35.9: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:41:11.89 +26:16:28.0: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:32.63 +28:21:16.9: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7347 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:19.79 +32:13:35.9: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6151 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:11.89 +26:16:28.0: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5475 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:23.31 +25:47:49.9: 10.31 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:20.32 +32:33:47.7: 11.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:22.01 +32:31:09.2: 11.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:27:29.91 +29:01:21.7: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:22.01 +32:31:09.2: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.4058 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:29.91 +29:01:21.7: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2251 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:16.59 +32:31:41.5: 11.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:20.32 +32:33:47.7: 11.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:20.32 +32:33:47.7: ref_mag=11.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1935 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:23.31 +25:47:49.9: 10.31 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.31 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:23.31 +25:47:49.9: ref_mag=10.31 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7806 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:09.58 +24:25:03.4: 10.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:11.15 +24:40:56.5: 10.43 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:16.59 +32:31:41.5: 11.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.08 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:16.59 +32:31:41.5: ref_mag=11.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.0578 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:48:41.55 +33:33:42.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:56.96 +24:24:38.6: 11.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:09.58 +24:25:03.4: 10.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:11.15 +24:40:56.5: 10.44 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.44 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.24 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:09.58 +24:25:03.4: ref_mag=10.24 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3594 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:11.15 +24:40:56.5: ref_mag=10.44 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7897 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:38.81 +25:01:20.4: 11.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:34.04 +25:05:22.3: 10.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:48:41.55 +33:33:42.8: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:56.96 +24:24:38.6: 11.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.00 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:56.96 +24:24:38.6: ref_mag=11.00 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4064 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:34.04 +25:05:22.3: 11.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:38.81 +25:01:20.4: 11.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.99 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.13 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:34.04 +25:05:22.3: ref_mag=10.99 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3060 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:38.81 +25:01:20.4: ref_mag=11.13 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5184 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:23.99 +32:33:22.5: 12.40 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:27.53 +25:07:55.9: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:33.24 +25:41:03.5: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:23.99 +32:33:22.5: 12.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:23.99 +32:33:22.5: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.2013 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:27.53 +25:07:55.9: 11.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.31 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:27.53 +25:07:55.9: ref_mag=11.31 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7792 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:33.24 +25:41:03.5: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:33.24 +25:41:03.5: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1400 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:33:46.97 +30:33:16.0: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:33:46.97 +30:33:16.0: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:46.97 +30:33:16.0: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5045 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:48.45 +25:44:56.5: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:07:02.61 +26:39:15.7: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:20.87 +30:53:54.5: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:41:10.74 +33:54:26.9: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:02.61 +26:39:15.7: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:48.45 +25:44:56.5: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:02.61 +26:39:15.7: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3013 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:09:50.78 +31:24:44.5: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:48.45 +25:44:56.5: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4744 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:41:51.86 +32:33:14.0: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:20.87 +30:53:54.5: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:20.87 +30:53:54.5: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7634 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:41:10.74 +33:54:26.9: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:10.74 +33:54:26.9: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8147 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:58:52.02 +29:59:32.3: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:50.78 +31:24:44.5: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:50.78 +31:24:44.5: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4578 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:25:41.17 +29:39:17.6: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:41:51.86 +32:33:14.0: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:51.86 +32:33:14.0: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9330 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:52.02 +29:59:32.3: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:52.02 +29:59:32.3: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5965 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:25:41.17 +29:39:17.6: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:41.17 +29:39:17.6: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0360 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:38:47.90 +35:04:23.9: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:49:09.29 +30:03:09.1: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:08.46 +31:26:23.7: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:38:47.90 +35:04:23.9: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:47.90 +35:04:23.9: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9037 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:49:09.29 +30:03:09.1: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:08.46 +31:26:23.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:09.29 +30:03:09.1: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0878 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:21:56.79 +30:53:15.4: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:21:56.79 +30:53:15.4: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:21:56.79 +30:53:15.4: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7309 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:15.58 +24:58:23.0: 11.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:43:37.08 +33:54:12.4: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:15.58 +24:58:23.0: 11.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.19 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:15.58 +24:58:23.0: ref_mag=11.19 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5924 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:23.25 +32:23:07.1: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:43:37.08 +33:54:12.4: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:43:37.08 +33:54:12.4: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6585 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:23.25 +32:23:07.1: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:32.72 +25:02:25.0: 11.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:23.25 +32:23:07.1: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9743 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:32.72 +25:02:25.0: 11.12 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.13 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:32.72 +25:02:25.0: ref_mag=11.13 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2387 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242402.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243070.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24946.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82530.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242161_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242161_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:34.61 +27:44:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242167_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242167_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:57.74 +25:48:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242169_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242169_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242172_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242172_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242177_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242177_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:00.89 +27:35:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242181_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242181_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242184_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242184_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:59.68 +34:57:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242188_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242188_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:49.37 +31:49:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242193_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242193_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242195_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242195_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:28.08 +33:20:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242196_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242196_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:54.23 +25:28:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242200_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242200_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242201_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242201_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.11 +32:30:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242202_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242202_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242203_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242203_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:19.81 +32:31:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242206_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242206_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242207_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242207_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:14.64 +32:34:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242209_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242209_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242210_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242210_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.06 +32:31:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242211_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242211_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242212_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242212_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:07.77 +32:34:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242232_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242232_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:50.35 +24:23:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242297_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242297_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242345_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242345_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.29 +32:03:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242347_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242347_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242380_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242380_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.50 +34:26:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242402_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
Preparing report for the candidate 242402_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242417_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242417_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242433_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242433_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242440_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242440_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242447_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242447_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.43 +27:56:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242453_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242453_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242458_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242458_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242478_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242478_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242495_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242495_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:09.87 +34:55:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242497_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242497_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.78 +28:29:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242499_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242499_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.64 +27:35:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242504_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242504_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.23 +30:28:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242508_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242508_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:20.60 +35:01:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242521_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242521_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242535_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242535_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242552_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242552_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242562_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242562_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:33.46 +28:34:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242568_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242568_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242591_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242591_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:11.66 +32:30:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242631_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242631_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:17.80 +30:10:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242644_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242644_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.88 +25:55:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242646_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242646_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:34.08 +33:00:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242649_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242649_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242652_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242652_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.28 +28:37:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242691_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242691_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.68 +34:23:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242708_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242708_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.65 +30:30:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242770_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242770_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:10.36 +32:41:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242776_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242776_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:23.31 +28:38:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242788_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242788_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:19.42 +31:39:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242790_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242790_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242798_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242798_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242809_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242809_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:15.19 +34:48:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242823_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242823_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:09.85 +24:55:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242837_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242837_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242854_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242854_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242866_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242866_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242878_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242878_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242879_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242879_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:05.49 +32:31:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242883_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242883_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242888_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242888_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:54.98 +32:52:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242890_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242890_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.15 +33:06:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242893_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242893_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242897_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242897_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242916_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242916_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.10 +25:05:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242917_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242917_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:57.01 +26:40:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242918_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242918_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:18.83 +29:32:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242923_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242923_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:17.27 +34:30:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242925_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242925_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242975_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242975_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:46.85 +32:03:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242978_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242978_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:15.16 +32:06:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242987_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 242987_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:45.53 +27:47:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243019_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 243019_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243070_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
Preparing report for the candidate 243070_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 243096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:46.69 +32:30:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243098_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 243098_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:40.84 +32:02:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
Preparing report for the candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.75 +31:24:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:28.46 +27:23:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.08 +28:36:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:03.13 +32:03:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:52.06 +29:02:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.04 +28:29:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:12.73 +30:56:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.76 +29:51:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:14.79 +32:22:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 211229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:11.39 +33:40:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24946_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
Preparing report for the candidate 24946_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.19 +27:36:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226537_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 226537_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 157544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.11 +31:35:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212442_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 212442_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:22.90 +34:38:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76109_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 76109_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:15.57 +31:22:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:48.38 +30:50:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.30 +27:29:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882
The candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0882 did not pass the final checks